Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council
Date: 26 July 2023
Time: 1.30pm
Venue: |
Council Chamber Hawke's Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street NAPIER |
Agenda
Item Title Page
1. Welcome
/Karakia /Apologies
Housekeeping /Notices
2. Conflict of interest declarations
3. Confirmation of Minutes of the Extraordinary Regional Council meeting held on 19 July 2023
4. Call for minor items not on the Agenda 3
Decision Items
5. Annual Plan 2023-2024 for adoption 5
6. Setting of the Rates for 2023-2024 Financial Year 11
7. Regional Planning and Māori Committee appointees' Remuneration Review 21
8. Report and recommendations from the Climate Action Joint Committee 55
9. Terms of Reference for the Hawke's Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee 65
10. Report and recommendations from the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee 75
Information or Performance Monitoring
11. Terms of Reference for the review into the performance of HBRC's flood scheme assets and river management programmes in response to Cyclone Gabrielle 79
12. Strategic projects report to 30 June 2023 85
13. Significant organisational activities through August 2023 93
14. Discussion of minor items not on the Agenda
26 July 2023
Subject: Call for minor items not on the Agenda
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the means for councillors to raise minor matters relating to the general business of the meeting they wish to bring to the attention of the meeting.
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council standing order 9.13 states:
2.1. A meeting may discuss an item that is not on the agenda only if it is a minor matter relating to the general business of the meeting and the Chairperson explains at the beginning of the public part of the meeting that the item will be discussed. However, the meeting may not make a resolution, decision or recommendation about the item, except to refer it to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.
Recommendations
3. That Council accepts the following Minor items not on the Agenda for discussion as Item 14.
Topic |
Raised by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leeanne Hooper Governance Team Leader |
Desiree Cull Strategy & Governance Manager |
26 July 2023
Subject: Annual Plan 2023-2024 for adoption
Reason for report
1. This item seeks a resolution of Council to adopt the Annual Plan 2023-2024. Council needs to adopt the Annual Plan in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002 before it can set the rates for the 2023-2024 financial year.
Officers’ recommendation
2. Staff recommend that Council adopts the Annual Plan 2023-2024 as presented.
Background
3. Annual plans are prepared and adopted under section 95 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA). Council is required to produce an annual plan in the years between long term plans. Long term plans are reviewed and adopted every three years. The Annual Plan 2023-2024 is Year 3 of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031 (LTP).
4. An annual plan provides an opportunity for small adjustments or variances from the long term plan to reflect changes since the plan was adopted.
5. The Severe Weather Emergency Recovery Legislation Act 2023 extended the Annual Plan adoption to no later than 30 September 2023.
Annual Plan 2023-2024 approach
6. Staff had to revisit our Annual Plan 2023-2024 budget and work plans following Cyclone Gabrielle. The cyclone has had a significant impact on our organisation, with substantial unplanned costs in our response and recovery work. Council has also taken on additional responsibilities across a wide geographical area.
Challenges and financial pressures
7. Councillors have been involved in several workshops and discussions around the challenges and financial pressures the organisation is facing. These include:
Unplanned cyclone costs
7.1. As of mid-July 2023, we have $92 million in unplanned costs for response and subsequent recovery work because of the cyclone.
7.2. This includes $42 million for waste collection (costs for this are covered by the Government’s Severe Weather Debris Funding Programme), $36 million on emergency repairs and rebuilding flood infrastructure, and $8 million for Civil Defence’s work.
7.3. We anticipate we will face further substantial unplanned costs during the upcoming year. We are working with the Government and other agencies to cover as much of these costs as possible.
7.4. The Regional Council has been impacted as others have with increased insurance premiums, rising interest rates, and inflation on both labour and supplies following the disruptions of Covid, the war in Ukraine and other global, national, and regional events over the last few years. These increases have been much higher than anticipated in our Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
Uncertainty
7.5. We are expecting funding shortfalls between what we can claim back for cyclone work through the Government, NEMA (National Emergency Management Agency), and our insurance. We will continue to explore all other possible funding avenues.
7.6. We do not know what recommendations will come out of planned reviews and how any advised work would be funded.
7.7. Uncertainty also exists around the physical works needed and how we can fund required mitigations to support Category 2-designated properties.
Our response
8. Staff and Councillors had a hard look at costs and our previously planned programmes. We cut costs where we could and have used all financial levers including borrowing for operating expenditure. Council has the financial capacity to fund the operating revenue shortfall using borrowing, and to do so is appropriate given the long-term benefits of the expenditure funded.
9. Council also had to make some tough decisions in prioritising the work we undertake in 2023-2024.
10. We wanted to strike a balance between keeping rates contained where we could, and resourcing for unplanned cyclone work.
11. This tightening of belts means Council has been able to substantially reduce the forecast average rate increase from 14.5% in Year 3 of the LTP, down to 6% (excluding the Regional Cyclone Recovery charge). The Annual Plan budget for 2023-2024 focuses on Council’s core business and supporting the region’s recovery.
12. We are also introducing a Regional Cyclone Recovery charge to fund the additional costs being incurred because of the cyclone that we don’t expect to be covered by other sources. This will consist of a fixed charge of $55 per SUIP (separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit) and a separate variable line item on rates based on land value.
13. Key work we are scaling back or deferring include:
13.1. Deferring construction expenditure for Ahuriri and Wairoa regional parks to the following financial year.
13.2. Deferring extension of the Ngaruroro Explorer cycleway to later in 2023.
13.3. Reducing maintenance of flood protection and drainage schemes such as beach raking, drain excavation and spraying due to work already done post-cyclone.
13.4. Reducing funding for one year only on Priority Ecosystem sites with the priority being to repair existing sites, such as fencing, to secure investment already made versus restoring new sites.
13.5. Reducing funding in pest animal and pest plant activities and research while staff are redeployed to rural recovery.
13.6. Reducing catchment delivery research and our environmental enhancement programme.
13.7. Deferring the Napier pilot of MyWay Hawke’s Bay (on-demand public transport service) until further central government funding can be secured.
13.8. Applying a cap of $5 million on the total amount we lend to eligible ratepayers for our Sustainable Homes scheme.
13.9. Reducing some ICT service software development.
13.10. Reducing staff training budget for the short term and not fill some vacancies.
13.11. Taking up general rates smoothing loan funding not drawn in years one and two of our Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
13.12. Extending internal loan repayments from 10 years to 20 years.
Community engagement
14. Staff undertook a feedback process with our community for a two-week period from 16 June to 2 July 2023.
15. We were not required to do this however we wanted to provide an update and inform the community of the difficult decisions faced and how we are working differently following the cyclone. We also wanted to provide an opportunity for people to let us know what they think and to get an understanding of what is important to them in the region’s long-term recovery.
16. We received 87 submissions from all over Te Matau-a-Māui. There was strong input from our horse-riding community for more horse-riding trails, better quality and safer trails, and better access to them. People needing to feel safe was important to submitters. Build back, and better, and helping people that have been impacted by Cyclone Gabrielle were also important to submitters.
17. Councillors considered and deliberated on submissions at an extraordinary meeting on 19 July 2023. They noted the issues raised and were happy to hear many Council initiatives were already underway addressing some concerns. They also noted that some, such as the desire for more horse-riding trails, would be considered as part of our next Long Term Plan.
18. While it is common practice for this council to provide the opportunity for submitters to speak to their submission, given the circumstances and temporary severe weather legislative changes to the Local Government Act, hearings were not offered for this Annual Plan engagement.
2023-2024 Annual Plan Budget
19. The impact of the changes included in the Annual Plan 2023-2024 budgets has resulted in:
19.1. an increase in the operating expenditure included in the year 3 of the LTP of $103 million because of the additional costs associated with the recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle.
19.2. an increase in operating revenue of $82.8 million due to anticipated funds from insurance, NEMA, and government grants.
19.3. Council will need to borrow more than anticipated in year 3 of the LTP, however we will remain with the borrowing limits agreed.
20. Council is managing increasing cost pressures, including higher inflation, interest rates, and a competitive employment and constrained contracting market. Council management will continue to actively work with budget holders during the year to ensure levels of service outlined in the LTP are delivered.
Financial strategy - setting an unbalanced budget for 2023-24
21. The Annual Plan 2023-2024 budget includes $19.7 million additional borrowing for operating expenditure, not set out in year 3 of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031. This additional borrowing means the Council does not have a balanced budget for the 2023-2024 financial year, with operating expenditure exceeding operating revenue by $21.5 million.
22. The additional borrowing comes from three main sources:
22.1. $13.5 million additional loan funding (borrowing) to fund the shortfall in the cost of repairs to flood protection assets damaged during Cyclone Gabrielle, not covered by insurance or government grants. This expenditure is currently classified as an operating cost, pending a final decision on the financial treatment of this work.
22.2. $3.6 million additional general rate offset loan funding, which was planned but not drawn in years 1 and 2 of our LTP.
22.3. $2.2 million of planned loan funding for ICT development and environmental data models. In the LTP and Annual Plan 2022-2023, these costs were treated as capital, but are now classified as operating due to a change in accounting standards.
23. The use of loan funding to fund operating expenditure is inconsistent with Council’s Revenue & Financing Policy, which does not currently identify borrowing as a source of funding for operating expenditure, other than for intergenerational environmental projects. Council therefore needs to record the fact that its decision to borrow is inconsistent with the existing policy as part of the decision-making process.
24. This inconsistency is due to Council’s decision to adopt an unbalanced budget, given the reasons for the additional borrowing identified above. Council has the financial capacity to fund the operating revenue shortfall using borrowing, and to do so is appropriate given the long-term benefits of the expenditure funded.
25. Section 80 of the LGA 2002 requires that where a decision of Council is significantly inconsistent with any policy, the Council must clearly identify:
25.1. the inconsistency
25.2. the reasons for the inconsistency
25.3. any intention of the local authority to amend the policy or plan to accommodate the decision.
26. Other than the balanced budget benchmark, all other benchmarks are met.
Fees and charges
27. For each annual plan, fees and charges are updated to meet the required revenue budget for the new year. The fees and charges for 2023-2024 are contained in a single schedule separate to the Annual Plan document but referred to within. This is made available on the HBRC website. The draft Fees and Charges Schedule 2023-2024 is attached to this paper.
28. The policy for fees and charges is unchanged from what was set in the Long Term Plan 2021-2031.
29. The majority of fees and charges in the schedule are either unchanged from 2022-2023, or have increased by 4% in line with increased staff costs, with the exception of the following:
29.1. Annual water meter admin charges (table 2.1 of the schedule); the fees have been unchanged for two years, but now need to increase to stay in line with the total costs of the water information services activity, which is 100% funded from these fees. The average fee increase across consent holders is 11%.
29.2. Annual freshwater science charges (tables 3.1 and 3.2 of the schedule); there is a slight increase of ~1.8% for discharge to land/water consents, and ~12% for watertake consents, as per modelling of charges required to meet the 2023-2024 revenue target (35% of water science costs). The increased costs of water science activities are mostly due to salary inflation and increased interest expenses.
29.3. Consents/compliance staff hourly charge out rates (table 9 of the schedule); consents/compliance admin rate increased from $95 to $113, and compliance monitoring rate increased from $130 to $140 as modelled to achieve resource consent application and compliance monitoring income targets per budget, and benchmarked against other Regional Council admin and compliance rates.
Significance and Engagement Policy Assessment
30. Staff assessed the changes from what was proposed for year 3 of the Long Term Plan 2021-2031 and advised Council there were no material rating or levels of service impacts that would trigger the need to consult. An engagement process was undertaken to provide an update to the community that included information on the rate increase and the introduction of a Regional Cyclone Recovery Charge. The engagement process also sought feedback on what was important to people in the region’s recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle and on the focus of the Annual Plan 2023-2024.
Climate change considerations
31. Climate change is a focus in all Council’s planning and decision-making. The focus of this Annual Plan of ‘Supporting the region’s recovery’ acknowledges climate change is increasing the likelihood and severity of extreme weather events such as Cyclone Gabrielle.
Decision-making Process
32. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
32.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset.
32.2. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
32.3. The persons affected by this decision are ratepayers in the Hawke’s Bay region.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and considers the Annual Plan 2023-2024 for adoption staff report.
2. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
3. Adopts the Annual Plan 2023-2024 in accordance with Section 95 of the Local Government Act 2002.
4. Delegates to the Acting Group Manager Corporate Services authority to make any required minor amendments or edits to the Annual Plan 2023-2024 prior to publishing.
Authored by:
Amy Allan Senior Business Partner |
Sarah Bell Team Leader Strategy and Performance |
Chris Comber Chief Financial Officer |
Mandy Sharpe Strategy & Corporate Planner |
Approved by:
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
Andrew Siddles Acting Group Manager Corporate Services |
1⇨ 2 |
HBRC Annual Plan 2023-2024 for adoption HBRC Schedule of fees and charges 2023-2024 |
|
Under Separate Cover- electronic only Under Separate Cover- electronic only |
26 July 2023
Subject: Setting of the Rates for 2023-2024 Financial Year
Reason for Report
1. This item is to enable Council to collect its budgeted rates revenue for the 2023-2024 financial year. It follows the legal process, under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, for Council to set the rates for the period 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2024.
Executive Summary
2. In the previous item, Council has adopted the 2023-2024 Annual Plan.
3. The next step after adopting the Annual Plan (which sets the budget for the year), is to set the rates to enable Council to collect rates for the year. The budget must be set before the rates are set, which explains the order of items on the agenda.
4. After Council has passed the resolutions setting the rates, staff can start preparing to send out rate assessments to all ratepayers. The 2023-2024 rates will be due for payment on 20 September 2023.
5. This Setting of the Rates paper will have a legal review ahead of the Council meeting on Wednesday 26 July.
Background
6. The Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, Section 23 sets out the procedure for setting rates, with the main considerations being that rates must:
6.1. be set by a resolution of the local authority
6.2. relate to a financial year
6.3. be set in accordance with relevant provisions of the local authority’s Long-term Plan and the Funding Impact Statement for the relevant financial year.
7. The Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, sections 13 and 14 (General Rate) section 15 (Uniform Annual General Charge) and sections 16, 17 and 18 (Targeted Rates) explains how each such rate is to be set.
8. Council has approved the 2023-2024 level of rates to be collected, along with the calculation factors in the Funding Impact Statement, as included in the 2023-2024 Annual Plan which has been adopted at this meeting.
Decision Making Process
9. Council is required to make a decision to set rates in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 (the Act) including Section 23.
Recommendations That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council: 1. Confirms that the decisions to be made on the setting and assessing of rates cover information in the Funding Impact Statement for the 2023-2024 year as included in the 2023-2024 Annual Plan as required by Section 95 of the Local Government Act 2002. 2. Sets the following rates for the 2023-2024 financial year under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, on rating units in the region for the financial year commencing on 1 July 2023 and ending on 30 June 2024. These rates are set in accordance with the relevant provisions of the 2023-2024 Annual Plan’s Funding Impact Statement and are inclusive of GST. 2.1. A general rate is set under sections 13, and 131 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 on an estimate of projected land value as per the following table.
2.2. A uniform annual general charge is set at $65.89 per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit (SUIP) under section 15(1)(b) of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 as per the following table.
2.3. The following differential targeted rates, as described in the Funding Impact Statement, are set under sections 16,17 & 18 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 as per the tables following. 2.3.1. Subsidised Public Transport – Based on estimate of projected land value and location (urban areas of Napier, Hastings, Havelock North and Clive but excluding Bay View)
2.3.2. Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme - Rates set on an estimate of projected capital value based on the location of each property.
2.3.3. Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme - Rates set on land value based on the location of each property.
2.3.4. Central & Southern Area Rivers & Streams – based on location and capital value
2.3.5. Wairoa River and Streams Scheme – based on capital value
2.3.6. Various Streams and Drainage Schemes 2.3.6.1. Napier, Meeanee & Puketapu – land value based on land use
2.3.6.2. Karamu & Tributaries – land value based on land use
2.3.6.3. Raupare Twyford – based on location and land value
2.3.6.4. Raupare Enhancement – based on location and land area
2.3.6.5. Haumoana Te Awanga – based on location and land value
2.3.6.6. Tūtaekurī-Waimate & Moteo – based on location and land value
2.3.6.7. Pakowhai Brookfields – based on location and land value
2.3.6.8. Brookfields & Awatoto – land value based on land use
2.3.6.9. Clive & Muddy Creek – land value based on land use
2.3.6.10. Puninga – based on location and land value
2.3.6.11. Upper Makara – Area based on location
2.3.6.12. Poukawa Drainage – land value based on location
2.3.6.13. Paeroa Drainage – Area based on location
2.3.6.14. Ohuia, Whakaki – Area based on location
2.3.6.15. Opoho Drainage – Fixed amount based on location
2.3.6.16. Kopuawhara Stream – Area based on location
2.3.6.17. Te Ngarue Stream – Area based on location
2.3.6.18. Esk River – Area based on location
2.3.6.19. Whirinaki Stream – Area based on location
2.3.6.20. Pōrangahau Flood Control – based on location and land value
2.3.6.21. Maraetotara Flood Control – based on location and land value
2.3.7. Animal Pest Strategy – based on area (greater than 4.0469 hectares), productivity and land use
2.3.8. Forest Pest Strategy – based on area (greater than 4.0469 hectares), productivity and land use
2.3.9. Sustainable Land Management – based on land area (greater than 4.0469 hectares), productivity and location
2.3.10. Plant Pest Strategy – based on area (greater than 4.0469 hectares) and productivity
2.3.11. Healthy Homes/Clean Heat – based on location (Napier and Hastings air sheds) and equalised land value
2.3.12. Sustainable Homes – Financial Assistance (includes Clean Heat Assistance) Based on value of service provided to specific properties as requested
2.3.13. Economic Development - Commercial and industrial properties based on capital value
2.3.14. Regional Cyclone Recovery (Variable) - All properties based on land value
2.4. The following uniform targeted rates, as described in the Funding Impact Statement, are set under sections 16 and 17 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 as per the following tables. 2.4.1. Various Streams and Drainage Schemes 2.4.1.1. Karamu Drainage – Fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part based on location
2.4.1.2. Karamu Enhancement – Fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part based on location
2.4.1.3. Kairakau Community – Fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part of a property based on location
2.4.2. Coastal Hazards - Fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part based on location
2.4.3. Economic Development: Residential and rural properties as a fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit
2.4.4. CDEM- Emergency Management - Fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part based on location
2.4.5. Regional Cyclone Recovery Rate - All properties as a fixed amount per separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit
3. Sets the due date for payment of rates set for the financial year commencing 1 July 2023 and ending on 30 June 2024 as 20 September 2023. 4. Resolves, in accordance with sections 57 and 58(1)(a) of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, that a penalty of 10% be added to the amount of rates for the 2023-2024 financial year that remain unpaid after the due date stated above. The penalty will be added on 21 September 2023. 5. Resolves, in accordance with sections 57 and 58(1)(b) of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, that a penalty of 10% be added to the amount of rates from previous financial years remaining unpaid on 2 August 2023. The penalty will be added on 2 August 2023.
|
Authored by:
Vanessa Fauth Finance Manager |
Chris Comber Chief Financial Officer |
Amy Allan Senior Business Partner |
Sarah Bell Team Leader Strategy and Performance |
Chelsea Spencer Senior Group Accountant |
|
Approved by:
Andrew Siddles Acting Group Manager Corporate Services |
|
26 July 2023
Subject: Regional Planning and Māori Committee appointees' Remuneration Review
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the means for Council to resolve the remuneration to be paid to Tāngata Whenua representatives (TWR) on the Regional Planning Committee (RPC) and the Māori Committee.
Officers’ Recommendation
2. Council officers consider that the remuneration reviews undertaken by Strategic Pay are satisfactory and therefore recommend that Council sets the remuneration for RPC TWR and Māori Committee TWR in accordance with the recommendations from the relevant review. Staff consider the midpoint of the ranges recommended are appropriate.
Executive Summary
3. Strategic Pay was selected by the RPC and Māori Committee to undertake separate remuneration reviews with these commencing in September 2022. The reviews have been completed and the findings provided to Council to enable Council to resolve remuneration for both RPC TWR and Māori Committee for the remainder of the current triennium, with effect from 1 July 2023.
Background
4. The current RPC Terms of Reference (adopted in 2014) states that the level of remuneration shall be determined promptly following each triennial election by independent persons (Appointee) appointed by RPC Co-chairs.
5. RPC Tāngata Whenua representatives’ remuneration was last reviewed in 2019 by Strategic Pay, and they were again selected as the single Appointee to carry out the review.
6. The last significant review of Māori Committee TWR remuneration was carried out in February 2018. This triennium, it was considered appropriate that both reviews be carried out at the same time.
7. The separate 2023 Strategic Pay review reports for the RPC and the Māori Committee are attached. In summary, Strategic Pay recommends that:
7.1. RPC Tāngata Whenua representatives receive an increase in their annual salary (from $13,750) to between $15,000 and $17,000 p.a. Additional meeting attendance fees remain at $452.
7.2. RPC TW Co-chair to receive an increase in salary (from $27,500) to between $30,000 and $34,000 p.a. and Deputy Co-chair to receive an increase in salary (from $20,625) to somewhere between $22,500 and $25,500 p.a.
7.3. The Māori Committee Tāngata Whenua meeting attendance fee remains at $452 per meeting.
7.4. Māori Committee Co-chairs to each receive an increase in salary (from $13,750) to between $15,000 and $17,000 p.a. The actual amount to be dependent upon what remuneration is approved for the RPC TWR Co-chair as the Māori Committee Co-chairs share that per annum salary.
Consultation
8. The RPC and Māori Committee have been involved in the review process; both selecting Strategic Pay to undertake the reviews.
9. The remuneration review was considered by the Māori Committee at its 7 September 2022 meeting where the Terms of Reference for the review was approved and Strategic Pay was appointed as the reviewer. Strategic Pay attended a Māori Committee workshop on 8 February and conducted an interview with Co-Chair Mike Paku on the 24 April to understand the scope and complexities of the role of TWR on the Māori Committee.
10. At its meeting on 14 September 2022, the RPC resolved to appoint Strategic Pay as the sole appointee to undertake the independent review of remuneration for its Tāngata Whenua members and delegated authority to three of its TWR members to finalise the process and criteria (Terms of Reference) for the review. The TOR were workshopped and confirmed by this sub-group of RPC TWR in January/February 2023.
11. Cyclone Gabrielle response delayed further consideration of this matter until 17 May 2023 when RPC TWR met with Strategic Pay to discuss the scope and complexities of the role of TWR on the Regional Planning Committee.
12. In early June 2023 Strategic Pay provided a draft of the RPC TW review which was circulated to the authorised sub-group of three RPC members and the Co-Chair on 8 June for comment. The initial response timeframe of one week was extended until 7 July 2023 to provide more response time.
13. Likewise, in early June 2023 Strategic Pay provided a draft of the Māori Committee TWR remuneration review which was circulated on 8 June 2023 for comment to both Co-Chairs and the NKII Board representative. The initial response timeframe of one week was extended until 7 July 2023 to provide more response time.
Financial and Resource Implications
14. If accepted, the recommendations will have a minor impact on Council’s budgeted costs. The table below sets out the impact based on an assumption that all recommended salary increases are approved at the midpoint of the range recommended by Strategic Pay - RPC Co-chair at $32,000 p.a., Deputy Co-chair at $24,000p.a., Tāngata Whenua members $16,000p.a.
RPC Fees |
Current annual cost per annum |
Number of members |
Assumption |
Number of members |
Assumed total per annum |
Co-chair |
$27,500 |
1 |
$32,000 |
1 |
$32,000 |
Deputy Co-chair |
$20,625 |
1 |
$24,000 |
1 |
$24,000 |
Committee member |
$13,750 |
7 |
$16,000 |
7 |
$112,000 |
Total |
$144,375 |
|
|
|
$168,000 p.a. |
Māori Committee Fees |
Current annual costs per annum |
|
Assumption |
|
Assumed total per annum |
Co-chairs combined |
$27,500 |
|
$32,000 |
|
$32,000 |
Total |
$50,100 |
|
|
|
$54,600 |
15. On this assumed basis, total RPC TWR remuneration costs would rise by $23,625 p.a.
16. Māori Committee TWR meeting attendance costs are assumed to remain constant as the meeting fee is not changing.
Decision Making Process
17. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
17.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset, nor is it inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
17.2. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
17.3. The persons affected by this decision are representatives appointed by the PSGEs and Taiwhenua to the Regional Planning and Māori Committees.
17.4. Given the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided, Council can exercise its discretion and make this decision without consulting directly with the community or others having an interest in the decision.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and considers the Regional Planning and Māori Committee appointees' remuneration review report.
2. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy, and that Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community or persons likely to have an interest in the decision.
3. Sets the remuneration for Tāngata Whenua representatives appointed to the Regional Planning Committee within the range recommended by Strategic Pay’s independent review with effect from 1 July 2023 of:
3.1. $15,000 - $17,000 per annum for a tāngata whenua committee member
3.2. $22,500 - $25,500 per annum for the Regional Planning Committee Deputy Co-Chair
3.3. $30,000 - $34,000 per annum for the Regional Planning Committee Co-Chair.
4. Sets the remuneration for tāngata whenua representatives appointed to the Māori Committee in accordance with the recommendations in Strategic Pay’s independent review with effect from 1 July 2023 of:
4.1. $452 per meeting attended for a tāngata whenua committee member
4.2. within the range of $15,000 - $17,000 per annum for each of the Māori Committee Co-chairs.
5. Travel reimbursement will be made to RPC and Māori Committee members upon submission of an approved Travel Claim Form or invoice, at the same rates paid to councillors in accordance with the Remuneration Authority 2023-2024 Determination, being as follows.
1 July 2023 – 30 June 2024 |
|
Mileage Allowance – petrol or diesel |
$0.95 per km (first 14,000 km) |
Mileage Allowance - Hybrid |
$0.95 per km (first 14,000 km) |
Mileage Allowance – Electric Vehicle |
$0.95 per km (first 14,000 km) |
Mileage Allowance – E-bike |
$0.28 per km (first 14,000 km) |
Mileage Allowance (after first 14,000 km) |
$0.34/km petrol/diesel $0.20/km hybrid $0.11/km electric including e-bike |
Authored by:
Peter Martin Senior Governance Advisor |
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
Approved by:
Pieri Munro Te Pou Whakarae |
|
1⇩ |
Strategic Pay RPC tangata whenua fees review report July 2023 |
|
|
2⇩ |
Strategic Pay Maori Committee tangata whenua fees review report July 2023 |
|
|
26 July 2023
Subject: Report and recommendations from the Climate Action Joint Committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Climate Action Joint Committee (Joint Committee) on 22 May 2023 and are now presented for the Council’s consideration alongside any additional commentary the Joint Committee Chair wishes to offer.
2. This report also asks the Council to adopt the amended Terms of Reference for the Joint Committee arising from recommendations at its first meeting on 22 May 2023.
Agenda Items
3. The Terms of Reference and membership confirmation item provided an opportunity for the newly-established Joint Committee to refine its ToR (as attached) including tangata whenua membership as suggested by the region’s Post (Treaty) Settlement Governance Entities (PSGEs). The amendments agreed and now recommended for adoption by each partner council, are that:
3.1. each PSGE is invited to appoint one member and one alternate to the Joint Committee, and
3.2. that minor changes be made to Section 2.3 removing reference to the planetary boundaries framework and aligning with central government policy on climate change.
4. The Joint Committee also elected Councillor Hayley Browne from Napier City Council as deputy Chairperson of the Joint Committee.
5. The Climate Resilient Development - Purpose and objectives in a recovery context item provided scene setting for the establishment of the Joint Committee and context on the role of climate resilient development in the recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle; where possible, prioritising actions that combine adaptation and mitigation.
6. The Spatial Climate Vulnerability Assessment item from Dr Tom Logan of Urban Intelligence of demonstrated the spatial-based Regional Climate Change Risk Assessment tool commissioned by HBRC. This tool overlays known hazard data for the region with infrastructure and assets data identifying exposure and vulnerabilities. Stage one has been completed and a table of known data gaps in climate change risks was presented to the Joint Committee for consideration.
7. The Examples of Regional Climate Change Strategies item compared the scope, aspirations and content of the Manawatū-Whanganui Climate Change Action Plan and Te Tai Tokerau Climate Adaptation Strategy to enable the Joint Committee to provide direction to the Technical Advisory Group.
8. The World Weather Attribution Study on Cyclone Gabrielle presentation by NIWA principal climate scientist Dr Sam Dean shared the findings of the study including animated rainfall data and estimations of the degree to which climate change amplified recent extreme weather events. He presented estimated return periods for the rainfall observed at different locations across the region ranging between 70 and 320 years.
Decision-making Process
9. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
9.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset, nor is it inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
9.2. The use of the special consultative procedure is not prescribed by legislation.
9.3. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
9.4. The items were specifically considered by the Climate Action Joint Committee on 22 May 2023.
9.5. Given the provisions above, the Council can exercise its discretion and make these decisions without consulting with the community or others having an interest in the decision.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and notes the Report and recommendations from the Climate Action Joint Committee.
2. Adopts the amended Terms of Reference (attached) for the Climate Action Joint Committee.
Authored by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau Climate Action Ambassador |
Approved by:
Desiree Cull Executive Officer to CE |
|
1⇩ |
Climate Action Joint Committee Terms of Reference for Adoption |
|
|
26 July 2023
Subject: Terms of Reference for the Hawke's Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee
Reason for Report
1. This paper seeks Council’s adoption of an updated Terms of Reference for the Hawke's Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee (Joint Committee) as agreed by the Group Joint Committee at its meeting on 26 June 2023.
Officers’ Recommendation
2. Council officers recommend that the Council, after considering the information provided, adopts the updated Terms of Reference as proposed (attached).
Executive Summary
3. The Terms of Reference for the Joint Committee have been amended to include mana whenua members as an interim step for the period leading up to the enactment of the Emergency Management Bill (EMB), which is expected to include provisions for mana whenua membership on CDEM Groups at both the governance (Joint Committee) and operational (Coordinating Executive Group [CEG]) levels.
4. In addition to the membership and consequential amendments, the opportunity was taken to amend the Terms of Reference in relation to audio or audio-visual attendance at Joint Committee meetings.
Background
5. As part of the corrective actions from the report “Strengthening CDEM in Hawke's Bay”, it was recognised that the CDEM Group structure, both at the governance and operational levels, did not effectively provide for tangata whenua representation and participation. At the time there was work underway by Te Puni Kōkiri, iwi, NEMA, and CDEM Group Managers to progress changes within the legislation through the Emergency Management Trifecta Reforms. It was hoped these changes would give certainty as to how iwi/mana whenua representation, relationships and partnerships could be provided for within CDEM.
6. The resulting EMB was supposed to be introduced in August last year, however due to a number of significant event responses over the last 12 months this was delayed. The EMB is now progressing through the legislative process and this gap is proposed to be closed by provisions added specifically so that “iwi and Māori participation is recognised, enabled, and valued”.
7. Although the EMB was introduced in Parliament on 7 June 2023, it is not anticipated to be enacted before the end of this year given Select Committee and Committee of the Whole House stages are still to come, as well as a general election on 14 October 2023.
8. For Hawke’s Bay, tangata whenua participation in emergency management is a critical element of the region’s recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle and future responses and cannot wait until the lengthy legislative process concludes.
9. The Joint Committee therefore agreed to take the proactive step to enable and invite tangata whenua participation at the governance level, on the HB CDEM Group Joint Committee, as advisory, non-voting members and resolved, on 26 June 2023:
9.1. Adopts the Terms of Reference for the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee following, to replace and supersede all previous versions.
9.2. Recommends to each of the partner councils, the adoption of the amended Terms of Reference for the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee as proposed.
Consultation
10. In preparing the amended Terms of Reference for the Joint Committee’s consideration, consultation was undertaken with tangata whenua, the National Emergency Management Agency and HB local government leaders.
Decision-making Process
11. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
11.1. Council’s governance structure must give effect to the principles of good governance set out in the section 39 of the LGA and enable it to effectively discharge its responsibilities under various Acts. In particular, the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council is required by statute to have the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Group Joint Committee in accordance with the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act (2002) section 12.
The Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee recommends that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and considers the Terms of Reference for the Hawke's Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee staff report.
2. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy, and that Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions on this issue without conferring with the community or persons likely to have an interest in the decision.
3. Adopts the amended Terms of Reference for the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Joint Committee as proposed.
Authored by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
|
Approved by:
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
|
1⇩ |
June 2023 amended CDEM Group Joint Committee Terms of Reference for adoption |
|
|
26 July 2023
Subject: Report and recommendations from the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee
Reason for Report
1. This report provides a brief recap of the recent meeting of the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee (the Joint Committee) and seeks feedback on the draft issues and options report and proposed public engagement.
Officers’ Recommendations
2. Council officers recommend that councillors consider the draft Issues and Options report and the public engagement proposals attached and either endorse the proposals as proposed, or provides feedback for consideration by the Joint Committee.
Context
3. The second meeting of the Joint Committee was held at Hastings District Council Chambers on 11 July 2023. Consideration of Objectives and 'Issues and Options' for the Future Development Strategy was the focus of the meeting.
4. The purpose of the meeting was to:
4.1. adopt FDS Vision and Objectives following feedback individually by Committee members, based on drafts prepared by the officers and discussed at the last meeting.
4.2. receive an Issues and Options Report, based on the demand analysis and the constraints and restraints investigations presented at the last meeting. The issues and options report would be used to underpin the first round of public engagement on the FDS.
4.3. receive and endorse public engagement proposals (these were set out in the Joint Committee agenda pack) before engaging with the public generally on the opportunities that can be explored to address these constraints and opportunities before developing alternative scenarios for specific evaluation.
5. Project staff delivered a presentation on those three matters at the 11 July meeting and responded to a number of comments and questions from members of the Joint Committee. Following comments and discussion, the Joint Committee resolved:
5.1. That the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee receive the Draft report titled ‘Consideration of Objectives and 'Issues and Options' for the Future Development Strategy’ dated 11 July 2023 incorporating the feedback received at the meeting.
5.2. That a joint report be taken to the three individual councils and Te Kāhui Ōhanga o Takitimu to seek endorsement on the Draft Issues and Options report incorporating the vision and objectives and the engagement policy. [i.e. this report for Hawke’s Bay Regional Council]
5.3. That the Committee endorses the proposed community engagement process including consultation with marae and hapū groups.
Next steps for FDS project
6. The next engagement step is proposed to provide opportunities for the wider public and stakeholders to suggest different options or approaches for urban development and to express their views on what is of importance or value in developing future scenarios. The ‘Issues and Options Report’ is a key resource to inform views relative to the challenges and realities of development on and within the Heretaunga Plains and surrounding environments.
7. The draft FDS will be formally consulted on (per the Local Government Act procedures) after March 2024. The FDS may become ‘operative’ circa October 2024 if endorsed/adopted by all three councils and mana whenua partners.
Significance and Engagement Policy Assessment
8. The matters arising in this report are considered to be very low in terms of the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy.
Decision Making Process
9. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
9.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset, nor is it inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
9.2. The use of the special consultative procedure is not prescribed by legislation.
9.3. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
9.4. The persons affected by this decision are those persons with an interest in the region’s urban environment, particularly in and around Napier and Hastings urban areas.
9.5. Given the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided, and also the persons likely to be affected by, or have an interest in the decisions made, Council can exercise its discretion and make a decision without consulting directly with the community or others having an interest in the decision. Notwithstanding this, there will be opportunities for public input and feedback at various stages during preparation of the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy during the 2023-2024 period.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and considers the ‘Report and recommendations from the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee.’
2. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy, and that Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community or persons likely to have an interest in the decision.
3. At the meeting, provides feedback to staff on the draft Issues and Options report and the public engagement proposals.
Authored and Approved by:
Gavin Ide Principal Advisor Strategic Planning |
|
1⇨ |
11 July 2023 Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee meeting agenda |
|
Under Separate Cover – electronically only |
26 July 2023
Subject: Terms of Reference for the review into the performance of HBRC's flood scheme assets and river management programmes in response to Cyclone Gabrielle
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the final Terms of Reference (ToR) for the review into the performance of Council’s flood scheme assets and river management programmes during Cyclone Gabrielle.
Background
2. On 26 April 2023, the Council resolved to initiate an independent review in accordance with proposed Terms of Reference. It delegated finalising the ToR for the review to the Interim Chief Executive, Bill Bayfield, with the proviso that any substantive changes to the TOR or the Review Panel composition would be subject to a further decision of Council.
3. Council also instructed Mr Bayfield to engage Phil Mitchell as independent Review Panel Chair.
Discussion
4. Attached to this document is the Terms of Reference finalised by the Interim Chief Executive on 5 July 2023 and accepted by the Review Panel. No substantive changes have been made.
5. Wording changes of note include:
5.1. Purpose of the Review amended to “report on the performance of HBRC’s flood scheme assets and river management programmes” (to ensure the review covers areas with no flood scheme assets e.g. Wairoa)
5.2. The Review Scope amended to
read “to consider and recommend improvements to scheme LOS,
maintenance or operation for future event a wider range of total
catchment options using a long-term and holistic vision and having regard
to increasing climate change risks” (to broaden the scope beyond hard
engineering options).
6. The Review Panel engaged to undertake the review is:
6.1. Phil Mitchell, Chair (resource management specialist)
6.2. Kyle Christensen (Chartered Professional Engineer)
6.3. Bernadette Arapere (Barrister).
Next Steps
7. As a precursor to starting their review, the Review Panel visited Hawke’s Bay on 20-22 July to meet Councillors and stakeholders and undertook a tour of affected areas initially within the Heretaunga plains.
8. The Review Panel is responsible for ensuring that affected community members, iwi partners and key stakeholders are given reasonable opportunity to input into the review.
9. The final report from the Review Panel to the Regional Council by 31 January 2024.
Decision-making Process
10. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Terms of Reference for the review into the performance of HBRC’s flood scheme assets and river management programmes during Cyclone Gabrielle staff report.
Authored by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
Approved by:
Susie Young Executive Officer Recovery |
|
1⇩ |
Terms of Reference - review of HBRC flood scheme assets and river management programmes in response to Cyclone Gabrielle |
|
|
Terms of Reference - review of HBRC flood scheme assets and river management programmes in response to Cyclone Gabrielle |
Attachment 1 |
26 July 2023
Subject: Strategic projects report to 30 June 2023
Reason for Report
1. This agenda item presents the Project Management Office’s (PMO) Strategic projects report for June 2023 for information.
2. HBRC’s key strategic projects are tracked by the Project Management Office (PMO) and reported monthly throughout their lifecycle. These projects were selected because of their significance in terms of investment, risks, benefits, and interdependencies.
3. This report is backward looking and reports on activities in the prior month specifically. In line with good project management discipline, particular emphasis is given to scheduling, budgeting and risk management.
Key
Project performance indicators (RAG): n= Off Tracku= At Risk l= On Track l= Not available
Status Change over last 6 months: how the status has tracked between November 2022 and May 2023. *Risk status is inherent (e.g. prior to mitigations and controls implemented) vs residual.
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||
1. HBRC Recovery Programme (Monthly reporting) |
u |
u |
n |
|
Apr |
May |
|
|
|
|
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Project summary: The Recovery Programme coordinates and tracks recovery planning and community communication and engagement activities across HBRC. This connects and aligns this work under the Hawke’s Bay Regional Recovery framework to support regional coordination of recovery. Under this framework HBRC will be the lead agency for the Environmental Resilience pou, the supporting agency for the Primary Sector pou, and will input into relevant workstreams under the other pou that will make up the Regional Recovery Plans. This programme will support teams working within this framework during the planning phase and help prepare the organisation for adoption of recovery initiatives into BAU programmes of work. |
||||||||||
Schedule – land categorisation community meetings and drop-in sessions started this month. Requests for land category reviews and changes by affected community members have been captured by phone, email, Social Pinpoint survey or directly from property owners at the drop-in sessions. These have gone through further technical analysis and assessment resulting in re-categorisation of many properties. Recovery initiatives outlined in the Environmental Resilience Plan have been reviewed and recovery costings reconciled with funding. An update has been submitted to the Regional Recovery Agency (RRA). HBRC teams have been supporting the Negotiations Team by providing data to support this process. Risk - present risks are the shortening timeline to engage with the community/mana whenua on the next edition of the plan, which may be a more comprehensive/longer-term view of recovery. RRA guidance on the next plan has not yet been confirmed. Uncertainty on outstanding funding. The need for meaningful engagement with our communities and mana whenua on the next edition of the plan has been clearly highlighted to the RRA. The Recovery Team has provided RRA with recovery initiatives. Funding requirements have been updated to provide clarity on HBRC's priorities and funding needs. Budget - negotiations with central govt is underway |
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
2. Recovery Claims - Insurance (Monthly reporting) |
l |
l |
l |
|
Apr |
May |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Project summary: This is a project to recover asset and business interruption losses arising from the impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle and how we will maximise recovery of costs to replace assets through our insurance policies. |
|||||||||||||||
No update provided this month. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
3. Recovery Claims - NEMA (Monthly reporting) |
l |
l |
l |
|
Apr |
May |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Project summary: This is a project to recover costs incurred through CDEM response (and HBRC) including response costs for infrastructure. |
|||||||||||||||
No update provided this month. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
4. IRG Flood Control & Drainage Programme (Monthly reporting) |
n |
u |
n |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: Project 1: Heretaunga Flood Control & Drainage Scheme We are reviewing and upgrading flood protection assets across the Tūtaekurī, Ngaruroro, Lower Tukituki and Clive rivers, to increase flood protection across the scheme from a 1 in 100 to a 1 in 500-year event. Project 2: Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme: Gravel Extraction We are removing gravel from the Upper Tukituki River to improve flood protection in Central Hawke’s Bay. Decreased demand for gravel has seen a build-up of gravel (aggradation). Extracting gravel from the riverbeds helps increase river capacity and reduces the risk of water inundation of neighbouring properties during a flood. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule - the delay in progress caused by Cyclone Gabrielle and the ensuing repairs has had a significant impact on the programme. The Ngatarawa Stopbank Upgrade contract has recommenced this month although has been affected by wet weather. Some gravel extraction has occurred in the past month and several extraction contracts have been extended to better enable contractors to reach their contracted volumes. Risk - programmes of work will not be completed in the current funding window. The Asset Management Group is in ongoing discussions with Kānoa (co-funder) to review the funding deadline and programme extents in order to identify practical project hold points and funding timeframes. Budget - the programme is significantly underspent. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
(Monthly reporting) |
u |
n |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: Developing a combined resource management plan for the Hawke’s Bay region. It will refresh how we manage the use and protection our natural and physical resources looking at all aspects of the environment. This includes land and freshwater, air, the coastal and marine area, climate change, biodiversity, urban form and development, natural hazards and risks, energy, transport, and infrastructure. Kotahi will combine and update the existing Regional Policy Statement, the Regional Resource Management Plan, and the Regional Coastal Environment Plan into one, while also giving effect to the new policies, planning and technical standards from central government. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule - the recovery environment has presented a potential opportunity to encourage the establishment of place-based contracts to undertake vision, value and Te Mana o te Wai Statement setting work. This avenue is currently being explored by the Policy and Māori Partnerships teams. Officers are working with Ministry officials to seek an Orders in Council that provides an extension to our statutory timeframes for freshwater planning, however we continue the work to ensure HBRC is able to meet its statutory obligations. Risk - as the region focuses on recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle, capacity of mana whenua and the wider community to undertake other business as usual work and engage in freshwater vision, values and Te Mana o te Wai statement setting is severely constrained. Staff are working within the recovery frame and looking for opportunities to incorporate requirements for National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management planning and engagement into recovery work. Budget – on track. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||||||||
6. Land for Life (Monthly reporting) |
l |
u |
u |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: A pilot on up to five farms with loans offered to landowners to plant trees on marginal land that can earn a return and enhance regenerative farming practices. Run in collaboration with The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) to accelerate erosion control work and extend the programme to more farms. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule - the draft of the business case was submitted on schedule to MPI at the end of June. Quality Assurance on the business case is underway by subject area representatives from HBRC, MPI and TNC aiming to have this complete by the end of July. Risk - key risks include assuring we have ability to streamline the farm planning process; funding for implementation and ramping up the project; prioritising/integrating the project with HBRC; and farmer uptake. Budget - the project is tracking under budget with ~$260k recommended to be rolled over to this financial year. This is needed to complete the business case, work through a go/no-go decision process with MPI, HBRC and TNC, work toward integrating the project with HBRC as a key component of rural recovery and start planning for implementation. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||||||||
7. Regional Water Security Programme (Monthly reporting) |
u |
u |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: Investigating water supply options aiming to ensure Hawke’s Bay has long-term, climate-resilient, and secure supplies of freshwater for all. This supports the Kotahi Plan and includes: exploring above ground, medium-scale water storage options in the Ngaruroro catchment for and on behalf of the community setting up a Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) trial in Central Hawke’s Bay to determine whether MAR is a viable water storage option and can contribute to water security in the area we will also work with water users to drive more efficient and effective use to complement water storage following the completion of a comprehensive 40-year Regional Water Assessment. |
|||||||||||||||
CHB MAR: Draft consent conditions have been issued, reviewed and applicant’s comments/amendments proposed. Mana whenua input was sought, and consent conditions reflect a commitment to form an alliance with Tamatea mana whenua, overlay and incorporate Mātauranga. Technical discussions are anticipated on some of the proposed amendments, but a final consent decision is expected in the very near future. Communications have been prepared with input from Kānoa, CHBDC and Tamatea Taiwhenua. Implementation planning is ongoing. Internal discussions are progressing. Heretaunga Water Storage: Damwatch Engineering has been engaged as independent technical peer reviewers of the Tonkin & Taylor Stage 2 technical study for Option 3 Dam site. This is due to be completed by mid-August and will complete the projects technical Prefeasibility/Advanced Prefeasibility studies. The Terrestrial Ecologist revisited the dam/reservoir site in mid-June to provide revised mapping, data and initial observations of the impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle on the terrestrial values of the site as identified and detailed in the earlier prefeasibility assessment. The project team is preparing a briefing to key landowners at the end of July and a Council site visit/workshop in early September ahead of key decisions to proceed. Funding will need to be secured to commit this project to further investigations. Regional Water Assessment (RWA): The final RWA report was discussed with Council in early June and issued for public release at the end of June. A decision was made to wait until further notice before launching a broader public campaign. These decisions will sit with the Policy team and it is envisaged that wider communications and discussions on these findings and the implications will accompany the Kotahi Plan when these timeframes and the shape of this work is determined. A Water Demand Assessment report focused on the Industrial and Territorial water users has been issued and is under review alongside another independent report on potential opportunities for efficiency gains of the Irrigators. These reports are scoping level documents designed to highlight areas and key opportunities for demand reduction across our highest uses. A covering memo/report will culminate recommendations for Council consideration and is anticipated for August 2023. Separate funding of $1M was ear marked in the Long Term Plan to progress priority recommendations. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
8. Farm Environmental Management Plans (FEMP) (Monthly reporting) |
l |
u |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: These aim to address environmental outcomes and actions to improve environmental performance on properties over 4 hectares initially within the Tukituki region in three-yearly submission cycles. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule - National Freshwater Farm Plan regulations were gazetted in early June 2023. The rest of the FEMP project is on hold and staff have been doing other work. Risk - identified properties without 2021 FEMP are the main risk. Interruptions to the project plan and schedule due to the cyclone, as well as farmer pushback at the next review cycle, are also factors. Budget - on track. Due to cyclone disruption in project planning and timeline, an under spend is expected this FY. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
9. TANK Plan Change (Policy) (quarterly reporting) |
u |
n |
l |
|
Dec |
Mar |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Project summary: Proposed TANK Plan Change (PPC9) will add new rules to the Regional Resource Management Plan to manage water quality and quantity for the Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū (TANK) catchments. TANK Plan Change (Implementation): TANK Sub-catchments Community Engagement - An external communications project, intended to inform rural landowners about the Proposed Plan Change 9 (PPC9) framework and to promote catchment group formation. It is a precursor to the overall PPC9 Implementation, the latter contingent on a decision awaited from Hearings Commissioners and any subsequent appeals. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule - there have been court ordered extensions provided to parties to respond to the Council memo as a result of Cyclone Gabrielle, however this is not considered to have added any significant or detrimental delays to the appeal/mediation process. There has been an amended topic allocation and an order was circulated on the 4 April. We are awaiting court direction for further mediation progress. Risk - Cyclone Gabrielle has added a further dimension as it is unknown how this will impact on those parties who are expected to be involved. There is likely an impact on HBRC ability to undertake this BAU when the core focus of the organisation is on recovery of the region, particularly for the science teams and those staff who will need to respond and engage with the forthcoming mediation and appeal processes, as this resource has been diverted to recovery of the region. The possible need for a plan variation to address the cyclone’s impact on freshwater quality has been identified. Budget – Extended delays throughout the process have extended the timeframe and programme for the TANK plan change, meaning that it has cost more in terms of time and staff effort, as well as consultancy fees. In this mediation phase, legal fees are likely to be the most significant cost. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
10. Transport Choices (monthly reporting) |
l |
l |
l |
|
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|
|
|
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|||||||||
Project summary: HBRC secured funding of $1.39 million from central government to upgrade eight bus stops in the region and create two new stops. The funding is part of a Transport Choices package included in the Government’s Climate Emergency Response Fund (CERF) led by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency. |
|||||||||||||||
No update provided this month. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
11. Revenue & Financing Policy/ Rates Review (Monthly reporting) |
l |
u |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: First principles review of our Revenue and Financing Policy, and full review of our rating system. The aim is to improve transparency for who pays what, ensure legal compliance, simplify the Policy and provide more flexibility in applying the Policy. Consultation is planned to take place towards the end of 2023 prior to the next Long Term Plan when the amounts rated for many Council services will likely change. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule – the project is on track. Two workshops were held in June. The first workshop discussed the application of outputs of step one into actual rating factors. The second workshop looked at targetted rates for sustainable homes, economic development and subsidised public transport. Risk – reliance on the availability of one or two specialist staff for the modelling work remains the main risk. We are still looking for an interim staff resource to take charge of the Excel modelling. Budget - project is funded within existing finance budgets. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
12. (Monthly reporting) |
l |
u |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: Development of an inaugural Regional Emissions Reduction Plan by July 2023 with broad community involvement, support, and engagement, which will integrate with the next long term plans of the region’s councils. The Emissions Reduction Plan will be informed by a greenhouse gas emissions inventory to establish the carbon footprint at the city, district, and regional level. A first for Hawke’s Bay. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule – The drafting of the Emissions Reduction Plan is progressing well. The plan (including practitioner group feedback) will be presented to the Regional Transport Committee on 4 August for endorsement of the Transport chapter, and the Joint Committee for Climate Action on 14 August. PSGEs have been invited to appoint a member to the Joint Committee, requiring a change ot the ToR. We have started work to establish the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for this committee and draft ToR so the TAG can meet before 14 August. Risk – no change. The reduced scope plan is now much more council-led than practitioner group-led, so requires more community engagement once complete. We have not been able to achieve genuine mana whenua engagement in the workshops hosted pre-cyclone. PSGEs will now be invited to appoint a member directly to the JC for climate action. A section of proposed community engagement will be added to the emissions reduction plan. Budget – on track |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||
13. Enterprise Asset Management (Monthly reporting) |
l |
n |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
|||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||
Project summary: Aims to embed an Asset Management Information System that integrates into and expands on the Enterprise Resource System (ERP) that was introduced during the Finance Upgrade Systems & Efficiency (FUSE) project. The goal is to improve efficiency, allowing us to confidently identify assets (both spatially and uniquely within a register), manage and maintain our current infrastructure through whole-of-life, and assess risk to determine when changes or additions are required. |
|||||||||||||||
Schedule – on track. Continued work on the design of the Asset Management Works System and Project Lifecycle Management. The Asset Register has been loaded into the production environment making assets available within TechOne. Risk – T1 financial architecture does not naturally map to the asset management financial requirements. Suggested work-arounds would mean primary objective of an 'out of the box' solution will not be realised and significant work will be required to deliver maintenance activity across the year. Continued work with finance team to resolve. Budget - on track. |
|||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||
14. Synergy (Monthly reporting) |
u |
n |
l |
|
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Apr |
May |
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Project summary: The enhancement of already implemented TechnologyOne modules to ensure a stable foundation for the future stages of the TechnologyOne ERP deployment at HBRC. |
||||||||||
Schedule - AP: Implementation of ABBYY Vantage (OCR Tool) is underway and on track. Creditor work almost complete and will move to Data Entry work next week. Payroll: Audit has been booked for July to close off workstream. Legacy Apps: Some changes have been made to Nav Viewer based on feedback from Finance. With them to test and accept. Other: WalkMe Implementation starts this month. Risk - project resourcing is a key issue with reduced capacity in Business Solutions Team, as well as increased demand for regional recovery activities. Finance availability has been impacted by year end and three staff have recently been seconded to other roles. Budget - On track. ABBYY, WalkMe and Atturra consulting within budget.
Note: ABBYY = OCR (optical character recognition) tool used by finance to scan and read information from invoices / credit notes and update TechOne. WalkMe = digital adoption / training / change management tool to trial with TechOne. Simplifies software usage by overlaying instructions & automating some steps. |
||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||
15. Clifton
to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy |
l |
l |
l |
|
Dec |
Mar |
|
|
|
|
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Project summary: Working in collaboration with coastal communities and local entities for more than eight years to develop the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy 2120. We now need to confirm which council or councils will take charge and lead this work, and are undertaking consultation, proposing that HBRC should take charge of coastal hazard adaptation between Clifton and Tangoio, as recommended by an independent Funding Review. This would give the Regional Council the mandate to finalise the Strategy. This includes consulting the community on the full implications of implementation, such as the timing and detailed costs of physical works, and who pays for what through the Long Term Plan 2024-2034 process. |
||||||||||
Schedule – on track. New notification date of August 2024 confirmed by the Joint Committee and HBRC. Risk - no new risks reported. Maintaining a watching brief on the implications of new legislation, particularly Resource Management Reform. Budget - underspent given interruption from Cyclone Gabrielle. |
||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status Change over last 6 months |
||||||
16. Ahuriri
Regional Park |
l |
l |
l |
|
Dec |
Mar |
|
|
|
|
Sch |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Risk |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Bud |
l |
l |
|
|
|
|
||||
Project summary: Working alongside Napier City Council and Mana Ahuriri Trust to redevelop the Lagoon Farm site into a Regional Park to address water quality issues in the Ahuriri Estuary, as well as enhance biodiversity, and cultural and recreational benefits for the community. |
||||||||||
No update provided this quarter. |
Key Strategic Projects - pipeline |
||
Title |
Group |
Estimated Start |
Regional Water Efficiency Programme (Future Water Use) |
Asset Management (Water Security) |
TBC |
Biosecurity Information System |
Integrated Catchment Management |
TBC |
Clive River Dredging 2030 |
Asset Management (Regional Assets) |
TBC |
On Demand Public Transport (Napier trial) |
Policy & Regulation (Transport) |
TBC |
Urban Catchment Plans (Te Karamū & Ahuriri) |
Asset Management (Regional Assets) |
TBC |
Decision-making Process
4. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Strategic projects report to 30 June 2023.
Authored by:
Sarah Bell Team Leader Strategy and Performance |
Jason Doyle Project Manager Policy & Planning |
Approved by:
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
|
26 July 2023
Subject: Significant organisational activities through August 2023
1. The following commentary is for councillors’ information to highlight significant areas of Council activity, particularly in recovery from Cyclone Gabrielle. Resources are directed toward various initiatives which reflect the Council’s evolving agenda, and it is important that Council is consistently informed of progress in areas that have created or may create a high external profile.
Significant activities by group
Policy and Regulation Group |
||
Project /Activity description |
Significant upcoming milestone(s) |
Team or Section |
Plan Change 9 (TANK plan) appeals |
66. HBRC has commenced proceedings with the Environment Court and appellants in relation to preliminary matters and order of topics for mediation. 67. In July 2023, the Environment Court issued a memorandum tasking HBRC to create a revised topic allocation proposal that does not have preliminary legal matters as a separate precursor to mediation on all other topics. |
Policy |
Plan Change 7 (Outstanding waterbodies) appeals |
68. Four appeals were lodged with the Environment Court. The Court has scheduled a hearing to commence on or after 20 November 2023. The Court has also set a timetable for parties to exchange evidence. HBRC is on track to circulate its expert evidence by 11 August 2023. Appellants will then need to circulate their respective experts’ evidence. |
Policy |
Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy (FDS) |
69. A meeting of the FDS Joint Committee was held on 11 July 2023. Refer to 26 July2023 Council meeting agenda for report and recommendations from that meeting. |
Policy |
Ngaruroro River Water Conservation Order (WCO) High Court appeal |
70. High Court appeal hearing was scheduled to commence on 8 May 2023 but cancelled pending clarification from one of the parties about their status and interests in proceedings. New High Court hearing date is yet to be confirmed. |
Policy |
Decision Making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
Recommendation
That the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Significant organisational activities through August 2023 staff report.
Authored by:
Mell Anderson Project Manager Hill Country Erosion Scheme |
Mary-Anne Baker Team Leader Policy & Planning |
Michael Bassett-Foss Land for Life Project Manager |
Vicki Butterworth Cycle Network Coordinator |
Desiree Cull Strategy and Governance Manager |
Bryce Cullen Transport Strategy & Policy Analyst |
Peter Davis Manager Environmental Information |
Ceri Edmonds Manager Policy & Planning |
Dan Fake Freshwater Ecologist |
James Feary Operational Response Manager |
Craig Goodier Principal Engineer |
Sandy Haidekker Team Leader Fresh Water & Ecology |
Simon Harper Team Leader Hydrology & Groundwater Science |
Nathan Heath Area Manager Northern Hawke's Bay |
Rob Hogan Manager Compliance |
Gavin Ide Principal Advisor Strategic Planning |
Jon Kingsford Manager Regional Projects |
Dr Kathleen Kozyniak Team Leader Marine Air & Land Science |
Anna Madarasz-Smith Manager Science |
Astra McKellow Senior Gravel Assurance Officer |
Louise McPhail HBRC Recovery Manager |
Ken Mitchell Asset Management Engineer |
Thomas Petrie Programme Manager Protection & Enhancement Projects |
Kate Proctor Pastoral Sector Prioritisation & Engagement Lead |
Antony Rewcastle Manager Operations |
Becky Shanahan Senior Scientist Marine & Coasts |
Matthew Short Catchment Management Lead - Biosecurity |
Jolene Townshend Manager Catchment Operations |
Paul Train Catchment Management Lead Southern |
Richard Wakelin Manager Rural Recovery |
Approved by:
Katrina Brunton Group Manager Policy & Regulation |
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|