Meeting of the Cyclone Recovery Committee
Date: 21 June 2023
Time: 9.00am
Venue: |
Council Chamber Hawke's Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street NAPIER |
Agenda
Item Title Page
1. Welcome/ Karakia/ Housekeeping/ Apologies
2. Conflict of interest declarations
3. Confirmation of Minutes of the Cyclone Recovery Committee meeting held on 24 May 2023
Information or Performance Monitoring
4. Rapid Rebuild projects update 3
5. Silt and Waste Recovery Taskforce 11
6. HBRC recovery update 39
7. Wider recovery update 47
8. Giving rivers room 51
9. Lincoln Agritech Braided Rivers Recharge research project 53
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: Rapid Rebuild projects update
Reason for Report
1. This item introduces a verbal update on the status of the Rapid Rebuild programme of work, which will provide a summary of the forward-looking programme of work as well as some context around where work yet to be completed is located.
Executive summary
2. This paper and the attached situation report summarise the focus of the Rapid Rebuild team in terms of work yet to be completed.
Background
3. The status of the Rapid Rebuild programme as of 7 June 2023 is summarised in the attached Situation Report. In summary, 42 breach and scour repairs have been completed, with a further 11 actively under investigation or in construction.
4. As previously presented, the scope of the rebuild is now widening to include other rebuild/repair works associated with flood control schemes.
5. More focus is now being placed on finalizing Completion Reports for the repairs that have been finished to date.
Decision Making Process
6. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the Rapid Rebuild projects update.
Authored by:
Jon Kingsford Project Manager |
|
Approved by:
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
|
1⇩ |
9 June 2023 SITREP Rapid Rebuild Projects |
|
|
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: Silt and Waste Recovery Taskforce
Reason for Report
1. This report provides an update on the status and progress of the Silt and Waste (debris) Recovery Taskforce (Taskforce).
2. Recent funding announced from central government on 3 May 2023 allocated $70.6m to Hawke’s Bay to deliver the recovery works through a vehicle like the taskforce; this report aims to outline the operations of the Taskforce.
3. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council is the administering authority of the funding received and is therefore the agency to which the Taskforce is responsible.
Background
4. The objective in March 2023 was to establish a sustainable Taskforce model for the recovery and management of silt (sediment) and waste (debris) deposited across the wider Hawke’s Bay whenua.
5. The Taskforce, alongside Council officers, established the following priorities once it was established:
5.1. To create a taskforce model to sustainably manage the silt recovery including resourcing appropriate expertise
5.2. To secure funding to support the ongoing Taskforce recovery programme
5.3. To support local contractors to collect silt deposited and manage silt deposit sites
5.4. To establish deposit sites to manage the silt recovered, with permanent end uses as the preferred outcome
5.5. To manage the activities undertaken to recover silt within regulatory and other required legislation
5.6. To provide confidence to the community in respect of environment controls, silt management and recovery methods
5.7. To provide clear communications and information to the community on the silt recovery Taskforce work programme
5.8. To work in with internal and external stakeholders to ensure best for region outcomes.
6. The scope of the Taskforce covers calls received through the 0800 108 838 number and an online form, and as otherwise directed to the Taskforce via email to waste@hbrc.govt.nz, the information within this report relates to that data captured. The first calls were received on 23 February 2023.
7. The Taskforce is not responsible for the silt collections in the Napier urban area or the Wairoa area.
8. The Taskforce currently manages calls related to silt (sediment) and waste (debris and wood) and the detail below provides detail on the recovery and management underway.
9. What is covered by sediment and debris?
9.1. Sediment - means sand, silt and clay particles deposited as a result of Cyclone Gabrielle. In the context of cyclone sediments, the deposition may also include gravels (larger particles, up to the size of boulders). Sediment may also be clean or contaminated with other materials. The type and nature of contamination may affect how the sediment is managed, where some form of management is pursued.
9.2. Debris - means the likes of horticultural and agricultural flood waste such as netting, packaging, chemicals, vehicles, equipment, caravans, sheds and building materials from damaged housing. This includes some woody debris, which in this context generally refers to fence posts, vegetation, and trees such as shelterbelts, riparian plantings and orchards that have been picked up by flood waters. In some cases, woody debris will include a percentage of forestry slash that will be in scope.
9.3. Council-Owned Property – includes properties where there is a clear public interest in the Recipient undertaking the Agreed Purposes on these properties. This could include activities taken on land that posed a significant health hazard but where restrictions on the land may have prevented other parties from taking action to address these.
The Response and Recovery
10. The establishment of the Taskforce resulted in increased collaboration between Hawke’s Bay Regional Council and Hastings District Council, and the ongoing support of Napier City Council, Central Hawke’s Bay District Council and Wairoa District Council.
11. The Taskforce implemented a zoning system to better respond and serve our community with the recovery of silt piled for collection. This system still operates to date and has 18 contractors collecting silt.
12. Deposit or stockpile sites were needed, and as close to the affected communities as possible. These are serving the recovery well, and we continue to refine how we use these sites and where they are located for future needs.
13. The Severe Emergency Weather Legislation Bill while allowing additional time to lodge consents and notify of emergency activities, doesn’t offer much other support to the Taskforce.
14. A significant amount of silt was quickly identified to be largely ‘clean’ – free from debris. While largely free from debris, a significant portion of silt was mixed with debris (organics and inorganics) and this varies area by area.
15. Estimates are that there are multi millions of cubic metres of silt deposited across our whenua.
16. A testing regime was established to test the silt at deposit sites, three times a week; this regime is still in place
17. Engagement with community, sector and mana whenua is vital to the recovery, and a communications plan and strategy has been developed and is implemented across the region.
18. The service model was built for silt but is able to be replicated across other areas. We are considering incorporating other waste streams to ensure that we are collecting all relevant information to enable the use of this model to drive and prioritise our work.
Engagement
19. We continue to regularly update the community with social posts and videos from the Taskforce covering the latest statistics, silt deposit sites, potential uses for silt, and more. We’re getting positive responses and hundreds of views on the videos.
Prioritisation of workload
20. All calls logged through the 0800 number or online platform are assessed either by a council or contractor assessor to help prioritise each individual job logged.
21. Assessors are looking for whether the silt poses a direct health and safety risk to person or property, noting in a lot of cases the how the damage has occurred to see if this is impeding cleaning up efforts.
22. Assessors are looking for whether the silt or debris is impeding business activities.
23. Assessors are looking for whether the silt is impeding access to a property.
24. Assessors investigate the silt/ waste stream and how well sorted or ready for collection the piles are, and whether we have an end use site for them.
25. Using all of these factors we prioritise which jobs our contractors respond to.
Silt
26. Since calls were first received from 23 February 2023, the following ‘jobs’ have been logged.
26.1. Rural Hawke’s Bay: The predominant recovery focus for the Taskforce with 413 silt collections logged since 23 February 2023.
26.2. Napier City: 24 silt collection jobs logged through the Taskforce channel. We understand 23 jobs were logged direct to NCC using their Ahuriri alliance contractor Downer to collect.
26.3. Hastings Urban: 21 silt collection jobs logged for the Hastings Urban area to date, primarily in Havelock North.
26.4. CHB Urban: CHB has had minimal jobs through the Taskforce channels, but we understand silt on property has and is being dealt with in Waipawa and Porangahau, along with some impacts to the rural areas.
26.5. Wairoa Urban: Wairoa has been managing their own recovery of silt, with an estimated 20,000 tonnes of silt collected and managed from residential properties.
27. We anticipate across these logged jobs to the Taskforce that we have circa 1,000,000m3 still to collect.
28. To date over 350,000m3 has been shifted from property, and a higher amount from roads and accessways.
29. The Taskforce zoned the wider Hastings, Napier and CHB areas to make the collection process easier to manage and coordinate – see next page for detail on the zones.
Zones
Impact by Zone
Zone 1 |
Zone 2 |
Zone 3 |
Zone 4 |
Zone 5 |
Zone 6 |
Other |
Total |
|
Needs assessment |
7 |
9 |
12 |
21 |
13 |
1 |
|
63 |
Assessed |
41 |
11 |
9 |
20 |
9 |
|
|
90 |
Contractor assigned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
Programmed |
|
19 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
24 |
In progress |
4 |
10 |
8 |
12 |
2 |
|
|
36 |
Completed |
2 |
17 |
33 |
27 |
28 |
|
|
107 |
On hold |
1 |
17 |
|
5 |
1 |
|
|
24 |
No further action required |
15 |
40 |
11 |
9 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
84 |
No status |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Total |
71 |
124 |
75 |
97 |
60 |
2 |
1 |
430 |
Management of silt – where does it go?
30. The Taskforce has established nine deposit sites across Hawke’s Bay to receive ‘clean’ silt that is collected by our contractors.
31. These sites are strategically as close as possible to the affected communities
32. These sites are mainly permanent. The early established sites were temporary in nature and have since ceased receiving silt.
What will we do with all this silt?
33. A number of end uses are in place and each of these add different options for the Taskforce, including:
33.1. Filling land voids within large properties
33.2. Recontouring and shaping land depressions
33.3. Use in aggregate and basecourse production
33.4. Use in future land development
33.5. Backfill material for borrow sites (typically used for stopbank repairs)
33.6. Use in creation of topsoil and compost for future land replenishment
33.7. Stockpiles for any of the above.
Woody debris
34. The recovery of woody debris across our land, in waterways, around our assets remains a significant challenge
35. We are well resourced by contractors to tackle this task – with the Hawke’s Bay Forestry Group, mobilising early with funding support of $1.5m from HBRC to begin recovery and clean-up in the Omarunui, Dartmoor, Arapoanui, Tangoio and Esk Valley areas.
36. Silt mixed with wood remains a challenge, we are working with our contracting teams to manage this. Some can be managed on site, other needs to be sent to our processing sites, of which we have three – in Omarunui, Dartmoor and Esk Valley.
37. A particular focus on wood recovery is being applied in the Wairoa District, with many known issues identified following meetings and time with Wairoa staff. Areas of focus are located at (not limited to):
37.1. Mahia, Opoutama, Taylors Bay
37.2. Nuhaka
37.3. Whakamahia
37.4. Railway Bridge
37.5. Opouiti Bridge
37.6. Willowflat Road
37.7. Mangawharangi Stream
37.8. Mangawhio Lagoon.
38. Napier coastal areas continue to be a focus with woody debris present at Bayview, Westshore, Ahuriri, Marine Parade and Tangoio.
39. Central Hawke’s Bay has reported that a clean-up required of woody debris is required at Kairakau; further information is needed in CHB.
Progress to date
40. 63 jobs for wood collection have been called through the 0800 number, of which 24 have been resolved. Staff are aware there is far more wood present and a combination of the 0800 number and our local information is required to deal with the wood recovery.
41. The Taskforce estimates to date 100,000m3 of woody debris has been recovered from land.
Mixed silt with waste
42. Our most challenging area to deal with is the silt that has engulfed property, equipment, vineyards, orchards and other such material
43. Separating this is an extremely manual and slow process to separate, which requires some separation on property for the larger material, and the balance transported to a processing facility to be screened to be separated.
44. We have since established two ‘processing sites’ to separate silt mixed with waste (debris) in Pakōwhai and Esk Valley.
44.1. Typically silt, once free from debris, will be tested and then transported to a deposit site.
44.2. Once debris is removed from silt it will be sorted into waste and recycle piles to either be recycled or sent to landfill.
45. We continue to learn and find solutions to deal with the waste (debris) streams; some examples are:
45.1. Extenday: following trials it is anticipated that Extenday horticultural fabric material can be turned into posts by a company called Future Post based in Waiuku.
45.2. PVC tanks: following a small trial in Waipawa, we have found a solution to collect damaged water tanks and send them to be recycled.
45.3. Flood damaged windows: a process has been developed with construction and demolition teams at council.
45.4. Tanalised timber posts: Ongoing efforts to salvage damaged orchard and vineyard posts include onsite trials to separate these, with our teams working with companies like Repost to try to salvage these posts from being burnt, chipped or sent to landfill.
46. We, along with other council waste teams, are working to try to find solutions for waste and to reduce the volume of waste going to landfill. This will likely involve targeted campaigns on specific waste streams as we work to collect these materials.
47. Omarunui landfill received a significant increase in volume, with approx. 15,000 tonnes of additional waste going to landfill in February, March and April from flood-affected household goods.
Commercial waste
48. Waste from commercial businesses is a challenge and as described in the silt mixed with waste section remains a slow process.
49. Funding for commercial properties that has opened recently to support the clean-up. Our service delivery model will support this waste stream, where a business cleans up their property, and calls through for collection.
50. The processing sites we have and are setting up will be able to manage the many waste streams with support from other territorial authorities. For example, Hastings District Council has recently released a flood damaged goods disposal guide (https://www.hastingsdc.govt.nz/assets/Document-Library/Waste-Resources/Cyclone-Gabrielle-Flood-Damaged-Disposal-Guide).
Government funding
51. The government funding announced for territorial authorities on 3 May 2023, covers the following activities:
51.1. Processing and management of sediment and debris resulting from Cyclone Gabrielle, including but not limited to testing, recycling, processing, transporting, shredding, chipping, containment, or disposal of sediment and debris
51.2. Maintenance of existing disposal facilities that are receiving significant quantities of sediment and debris, or the establishment of new sediment and debris processing, stockpiling and disposal sites
51.3. The collection and management of sediment and debris resulting from Cyclone Gabrielle within the public interest, such as on/in Council-Owned Property or other assets and/or where there is a health or environmental risk, and not otherwise funded or able to be funded
51.4. The collection and transport of sediment and debris from residential properties, including clearing of accessways, and
51.5. The Recipient may perform administrative and operational actions to support the Agreed Purposes, and its costs for these may be claimed to the extent payable as Eligible Costs.
Commercial business funding
52. Part of the funding announced on 3 May 2023 included a commercial grant of $62.6million for businesses impacted in Hawke’s Bay. The objective of this fund is to support businesses to return their land to production and an economic state.
53. The fund is to be administered by the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council within an agreed design brief by DIA which outlines the eligibility and criteria which applications need to meet and be prioritised within.
54. The applications to this fund opened on 6 June 2023.
Resourcing the Taskforce
55. The Taskforce is resourced through a cross council and external supplier team.
56. The Taskforce has engaged over 25 contractors, over 90% local to Hawke’s Bay, and all Tier 2 and below.
57. The Taskforce has worked to streamline options for landowners recovering and cleaning up their land with a recent collaboration with Insurance Council NZ and EQC to create a shared authorised contractor list whereby a contractor can work for a landowner to clean up silt / debris on property, and also be engaged by the Taskforce to transport to a deposit/ processing site in the place of engaging a Taskforce contractor to be programmed to collect a pile.
Risks and Challenges
58. Meeting community needs and expectations within funding available.
59. Impact of land classification (zoning) on clean-up efforts.
60. Land form change impacted by further silt removal inconsistency.
61. Catchment changes and impacts due to silt deposited onto land impacting flow paths.
62. Impact of abandoned vehicles, machinery and houses on the clean-up efforts.
63. Regulatory restrictions and pressures:
63.1. Operating within traditional resource management requirements, e.g. a resource consent required for all deposit sites to be lodged 160 days from date of Section 330 notification.
63.2. Operating with within Waste Minimisation Act (WMA) requirements places a burden on the Taskforce to report all loads entering our facilities and a requirement to report these to MfE monthly. Regulations under the WMA do not provide flexibility to update waste tonnage information after the reporting deadline has passed (except for facilities that have been approved to report annually).
63.3. It should be noted an Order in Council is proposed to support the challenges identified in 63.2 above and is expected to be enacted in late June 2023 to allow wash up of data, and flexibility on reporting.
64. Delivering an equitable service to all communities.
65. The volume and transactional nature of contract management required to deliver the recovery works.
66. Resourcing a cross-council Taskforce for an extended period of time while not detracting from business-as-usual demands and expectations.
Funding and Expenditure to date
67. The Taskforce of Hastings District Council and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council estimates to have expended $9.7m to the end of May 2023.
68. The Napier City Council, Central Hawke’s Bay District Council, Wairoa District Council and Hawke’s Bay Regional Councils estimate to have expended $12.063m to 30 June 2023 on non-Taskforce related activities (such as drain clearance).
69. Moving forward a budget will be assigned to Napier City Council (urban and Awatoto silt management) and Wairoa District Council (silt management) to continue to undertake these activities for their communities. The balance of the activities that fall within the sediment and debris remit will be delivered by the Taskforce.
70. A back-to-back agreement is to be executed by the councils to agree on this commitment to collaborate and work together to deliver on the outcomes of the funding agreement and community needs.
Next Steps
71. The government funding is to be spent by 30 June 2024, the Taskforce continues to monitor progress against expenditure and will continue to report into the Group Managers on a monthly basis via a status report and verbal update.
72. The Taskforce will continue to support the community with the existing service delivery model as outlined in government operating parameters (paras 51.1 – 51.5).
73. The Taskforce will communicate and engage with the community to provide reassurance and confidence the clean-up efforts are a priority, and that we are making progress.
74. Support for whenua Māori is still being finalised, but funding will be available to be used for costs related to the clean-up of silt, sediment, and debris. Te Puni Kōkiri will be leading engagement with key entities and affected communities to better understand the needs of landowners and the location of affected whenua.
Decision Making Process
75. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the Silt and Waste Recovery Taskforce staff report.
Authored by:
Natalie Brown Senior Business Analyst |
Darren De Klerk Silt And Waste Recovery Taskforce Lead |
Approved by:
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
|
1⇩ |
Silt & Waste Recovery Taskforce Status Report 5 |
|
|
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: HBRC Recovery update
Reason for Report
1. This item provides an update on the various HBRC recovery activities underway.
Recovery Workstream Initiatives (as outlined in the Environmental Resilience Plan – edition 1) |
|
1 |
Catchment Management: (Catchment Operations/ Science) 1.1 Erosion Control: Erosion Control Scheme re-establishment 1.2 Land for Life 1.3 Build nursery capability 1.4 Sediment & erosion control 1.5 Biosecurity, pest & predator control 1.6 Effectiveness of existing erosion control work 1.7 Erosion Control Scheme – post-cyclone project audit 1.8 Hapara Takatu (shovel ready) fencing repairs 1.9 Biosecurity post-cyclone auditing 1.10 Contaminated gravel |
2 |
Resource Management & Land Use: (Science) 2.1 LiDAR capture 2.2 Quantification of land damage |
3 |
Indigenous Ecosystems, Biodiversity, and Conservation: (Science & Catchment Operations) 3.1 Cyclone impact assessment on natural environment (freshwater, lakes, marine & coast, terrestrial ecosystems) 3.2 Biodiversity Protection and Enhancement programme recovery design 3.3 Implementation of Priority Ecosystem Programme 3.4 Implementation of Protection and Enhancement Programme |
4 |
Climate Change (Science & Climate Ambassador) 4.1 Flood frequency analysis 4.2 Greenhouse gas inventory 4.3 Natural attenuation potential 4.4 Regional climate change vulnerabilities assessment 4.5 Assess impacts on air quality |
5 |
Waste (Asset Management: Operational Response Team) 5.1 Silt 5.2 Woody debris 5.3 Mixed waste |
6 |
Water Security & Health (Science & Regional Water Security Programme Manager) 6.1 Changes in groundwater recharge dynamics 6.2 Assessment of spring feed flows 6.3 Re-assessment of low flows 6.4 Groundwater quality 6.5 Water Storage - feasibility study |
7 |
Land Use Recovery (Rural Recovery Team) 7.1 HBRC Rural Recovery Strategy development 7.2 Building resilient rural businesses 7.3 Water quality for primary sector 7.4 Individual SLUI -style recovery farm plans which will transition to NPSFM freshwater planning 7.5 Incentive Scheme funding |
8 |
Flood Protection (Asset Management: The Capital Delivery Team - Rapid Response) 8.1 Rapid rebuild of stopbanks 8.2 Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme 8.3 Upper Tukituki Scheme 8.4 Pumpstation review 8.5 Wairoa (new scheme) 8.6 Replace and improve drainage pumpstations 8.7 Support for private land owners with river damage, edge protection, stabilisation of river course 8.8 Gravel extraction |
9 |
Transport 9.1 Cycleways |
Decision-making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the HBRC recovery update.
Authored by:
Richard Wakelin Manager Rural Recovery |
Anna Madarasz-Smith Manager Science |
Julie-Anne Mcphee Recovery Programme Manager |
Jolene Townshend Manager Catchment Operations |
James Feary Operational Response Manager |
Jon Kingsford Project Manager |
Pippa Mckelvie-Sebileau Climate Action Ambassador |
|
Approved by:
Louise McPhail HBRC Recovery Manager |
|
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: Wider recovery update
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the means for staff to update the Committee on central government announcements and related activities.
2. This update will focus on land categorisation and Orders in Council.
Land categorisation
3. On 1 May 2023, the Government announced a three-category framework for properties in areas affected by severe weather to guide policy considerations, and to support consistent decision-making across local and central government. The risk categories are described in Table 1.
Table 1
Category |
Definitions |
Examples |
1 |
Repair to previous state is all that is required to manage future severe weather event risk. |
Minor flood damage to repair but no need for significant redesign/retrofitting. |
2C |
Community level interventions are effective in managing future severe weather event risk. |
Local government repairs and enhances flood protection schemes to adequately manage the risk of future flooding events in the face of climate change effects. |
2P |
Property level interventions are needed to manage future severe weather event risk, including in tandem with community level interventions. |
Property specific measures are necessary e.g. improved drainage, raising houses is necessary. Benefits accrue to property owners but some may face affordability issues. |
2A |
Potential to fall within 2C/2P but significant further assessment required. |
Interventions may be required / possible but insufficient information to provide initial categorisation. (These may subsequently move between 2 categories or to categories 1 / 3.) |
3 |
Future severe weather event risk cannot be sufficiently mitigated. In some cases some current land uses may remain acceptable, while for others there is an intolerable risk of injury or death. |
In the face of enhanced climate risks the property may face unacceptable risk of future flooding. Other property could be subject to unstable land that poses an ongoing risk. |
4. On 1 June, affected landowners in Hawke’s Bay were notified by email of the initial land category their property is located supported by 18 provisional hazard maps. The maps were prepared using the following information:
4.1. Approximate flood extents derived from air photos taken on or around 16 February 2023 (post Cyclone Gabrielle) by Skycan.
4.2. Rapid building assessment data for Hastings District Council, Wairoa District Council, Napier City Council, and Central Hawke’s Bay District Council.
4.3. Contour information derived from LiDAR data collection November 2020.
4.4. Photographs of flood extents and flood damage and information supplied during public meetings and discussions with residents.
4.5. Information from insurance providers.
5. The provisional maps are in the process of being independently verified and peer reviewed and are due to be completed mid-June.
6. Later that day, the Government announced it will enter into a funding arrangement with councils to support them to offer a voluntary buyout for owners of Category 3 designated residential properties. It will also co-fund work needed to protect Category 2 designated properties.
7. Decisions on the details how the voluntary buyout process will work will be made in the coming weeks. This will include the criteria for valuation of Category 3 properties, the split of costs between councils and central government and the treatment of uninsured properties. Central government is aiming to conclude negotiations with local government by the end of June.
8. On 14 June, the first of 18 council-led community meetings is scheduled. This includes four mana whenua hui. This is an important step in the process to engage directly with property owners and impacted residents in each area. HBRC will be responsible for providing an area-specific summary of cyclone impact, remediation and categorisation and a high-level explanation of the process from here. More direct engagement will follow.
9. There is also likely to be HDC-organised community hubs one day per week for four weeks in Pākōwhai, Hastings Library and Taradale Library, which HBRC will staff alongside other councils.
Legislation and Orders in Council
10. On 7 June 2023, Minister for the Environment Hon David Parker announced a proposal for a temporary law change that would allow rural landowners to burn some cyclone and flood debris waste that is currently prohibited under national and regional regulations. The Minister’s media release[1] says:
The proposed Order in Council under the Severe Weather Emergency Recovery Legislation Act would temporarily allow open-air burning of cyclone and flood waste in Hawke’s Bay and Tairāwhiti. If approved, the Order in Council would take effect no later than 27 June, and would expire on 15 December [2023].
“The permitted activity standards accompanying this temporary law change would include:
Steps to separate materials, where possible
Timing of the burn
Weather conditions
Preparation of a fire management plan
Notification of parties (e.g. fire services and public health)
Appropriate disposal of remaining waste material and ash
Site testing and remediation, if required.
The Order in Council is now being prepared by [MFE] officials, who will discuss its application with affected parties including councils. Public engagement on the proposal is scheduled to begin on Friday 9 June and conclude Tuesday 13 June, with information to be made available on the Ministry for the Environment website.
11. Some additional further information[2] about that proposal was published on MFE’s website last week, but specific wording of the draft Order has not been published.
12. Meanwhile, on MFE’s webpage[3] about recent severe weather event recovery, reference is made to work on further orders in council, but the details are limited. Content currently says:
Tranche 4
12.1. Public engagement period: 4 - 7 July
12.2. Expected enactment: August
12.3. “More detail to be available soon”
Tranche 5
12.4. Public engagement period: 25 - 28 July
12.5. Expected enactment: September
12.6. “Proposed changes to consenting timeframes and compliance timeframes for national direction under the Resource Management Act. More detail to be available soon.”
13. In the table below, is the intel we have to date on OICs in progress. Most of these apply to affected councils across the North Island (not just HB).
What |
Timing |
OIC for outdoor burning of mixed waste on rural land which is otherwise a prohibited activity under national regulations and/or rules in the regional plan[4] (see above) |
Cabinet decision on 6 June and to come into effect 27 June. |
DIA has consulted on eight temporary amendments to local government legislation to simplify annual planning and rate setting processes and extend the statutory timeframe for approving local governance statements and triennial agreements. Local Government Act 2002 13.1 Provide a three-month extension of the timeframe for affected local authorities to enter into triennial agreements, to 1 June 2023 13.2 provide a three-month extension for a local governance statement to be prepared by affected local authorities, to 8 July 2023 13.3 modify consultation requirements for annual plans so severely affected local authorities may comply with the principles of section 82 to the extent that is reasonably practicable 13.4 enable severely affected local authorities to make decisions to change services and service levels without amending their long-term plan 13.5 remove the requirement for severely affected local authorities to align funding for activities with the source of funding so they can redistribute funds to affected communities more easily 13.6 modify the consultation requirements for making additions to rates remission and postponement requirements so severely affected local authorities can publish and allow two weeks for feedback rather than doing extensive consultation Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 13.7 enable severely affected local authorities to set rates that different to what was provided for in their long‑term plan Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014 13.8 remove the requirement for severely affected local authorities to predict their performance against financial benchmarks. 13.9 Reducing consenting requirements for new or upgraded flood protection schemes to reduce construction timeframes in Category 2 locations. |
Tranche One – comes into effect w/s 6 June (tbc) |
The DIA is exploring two options for the 2024 LTP: 13.10 an unaudited 3-year plan 13.11 an unaudited 10-year plan with modified content. |
Tranche Two – to come into effect August 2023. |
HBRC staff are continuing discussions with senior MfE officials on a range of ideas on RMA-related legislation which includes: Noting: we have not filed any formal requests for anything on this list and making a request does not guarantee an OIC will be made: 13.12 Relaxing s360 stock exclusion regulations 13.13 Relaxing incoming regulations for freshwater farm plans/planning in HB region 13.14 Re-aligning Tukituki PC6 requirement for next FEMP update (due 1 June 2024) to 1 June 2025 to allow a transition to national regulations FWFP requirements. 13.15 Streamlining interim freshwater planning (not full-on NPSFM freshwater-related Plans) 13.16 Streamlining interim resource management planning (non-freshwater-related plan matters) 13.17 RMA appeals on points of law only (like ECan) 13.18 Enabling local authorities to amend default statutory timeframes for affected landowners to comply with statutory timeframes (e.g. s124 RMA timeframes) 13.19 Enabling interim consenting processes to support rural recovery and improve water user certainty in TANK catchments while Proposed Plan Change 9 is subject to ongoing Environment Court appeal proceedings. |
Under discussion |
Decision-making Process
14. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the Wider recovery update.
Authored by:
Jess Bennett Senior Manager - Finance Recovery |
Desiree Cull Executive Officer to CE |
Ceri Edmonds Manager Policy & Planning |
Gavin Ide Principal Advisor Strategic Planning |
Approved by:
Katrina Brunton Group Manager Policy & Regulation |
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
Susie Young Group Manager Corporate Services |
Attachment/s There are no attachments for this report.
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: Giving rivers room
Reason for Report
1. This report introduces the Giving rivers room presentation by Tom Kay, Forest & Bird Aotearoa, and provides some background reading material attached.
Decision-making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the Giving rivers room presentation by Tom Kay, Forest & Bird Aotearoa.
Authored by:
Allison Doak Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
|
1⇨ |
Forest & Bird Making room for rivers |
|
Under Separate Cover |
2⇨ |
Reanimating the strangled Rivers of Aotearoa - Brierley (2022) |
|
Under Separate Cover |
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
Cyclone Recovery Committee
21 June 2023
Subject: Lincoln Agritech Braided Rivers Recharge research project
Reason for Report
1. This report introduces a presentation on the Lincoln Agritech braided rivers recharge research, which will provide:
1.1. an overview of the research programme, including revisiting the objectives and outcomes sought, timeframes, budgets and partners involved.
1.2. an update on the data collected, analysis undertaken and present some of the preliminary findings.
Executive Summary
2. The Braided Rivers Research Programme is a five-year initiative (2019-2024) funded by MBIE and aimed at understanding the amount of water exchanged between braided river systems and underlying groundwater resources.
3. The research investigates how braided river systems are connected to alluvial aquifers and how changes in braided rivers (bed elevation and width) affect leakage rates. This research helps to inform river management practices and environmental limits. This knowledge will enable river managers and decision-makers to understand the effect that different river engineering interventions have on groundwater recharge and enable rivers to be managed in a more holistic manner.
Strategic Fit
4. This work underpins actions and outcomes listed in the 2020-2025 Strategic Plan as things that the council will continue to do; and will do differently:
4.1. Water – the research by Lincoln Agritech has found that hydrologic functioning can be improved if rivers can be managed as a whole system. Rivers have traditionally been managed primarily for flood protection, and this has been at the expense of groundwater recharge, and potentially low-flow resilience (a proposed future research direction).
4.2. Land - managing rivers in a way that optimises the annual water balance, river flows and groundwater recharge will provide resilience to climate variability and change.
4.3. Biodiversity – the widening of river corridors not only improves hydrological function but also biodiversity.
4.4. Infrastructure and Services – Much of the infrastructure for climate resilience is already in place (rivers and aquifers). HBRC has an opportunity to optimise existing natural infrastructure by simply changing river management.
Background
5. This research was driven by the need to better understand the interaction between braided rivers and groundwater resources. This gap in understanding was identified while investigating long-term declines in groundwater levels in the Wairau Aquifer (Wohling 2018). The declines could not be explained by the usual causes (pumping, changes in ERT, increased drainage) which lead to structural changes in the river being identified as the likely cause (Wohling et al. 2020). However, information on the interaction between braided river and aquifer settings was scarce which prompted a research proposal being submitted to the MBIE Endeavour Fund. HBRC has been involved from the start (initiated by Thomas Wilding).
What is the budget?
6. In 2019, Lincoln Agritech Ltd was awarded ~$8m in MBIE funding aimed at understanding the amount of water exchanged between braided river systems and underlying groundwater resources. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has provided a cash contribution of $50,000 in 2020/21 and in-kind contribution in the form of access to existing models, access to SkyTEM data, gauging support, and staff participation in workshops and advisory groups.
Who’s involved?
7. The programme includes experts from Lincoln Agritech Ltd, as well as NIWA, Lincoln University and its Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU), University of Canterbury, Waterways Centre for Freshwater Management, Flinders University (Australia), Technische Universität Dresden (Germany), and Aarhus University (Denmark).
What’s being collected and where?
8. The team has used novel approaches to characterise river losses, hyporheic exchange and parafluvial flow. Techniques include fibre optics for temperature sensing, geophysical techniques to measure ground resistivity, river bathymetry, thermal imagery, isotope analysis (radon) and advanced 3D hydrological modelling.
9. The research focuses on three case-study rivers 1) Ngaruroro River (partners HBRC, Ngāti Kahungunu), 2) Selwyn/Wakirikiri River in Canterbury (partners Te Taumutu Rūnaka, ECan, and 3) Wairau River in Marlborough (partner MDC).
Discussion
10. Reason for Report
1. This report introduces a presentation on the Lincoln Agritech braided rivers recharge research, which will provide:
1.1. an overview of the research programme, including revisiting the objectives and outcomes sought, timeframes, budgets and partners involved.
1.2. an update on the data collected, analysis undertaken and present some of the preliminary findings.
Executive Summary
2. The Braided Rivers Research Programme is a five-year initiative (2019-2024) funded by MBIE and aimed at understanding the amount of water exchanged between braided river systems and underlying groundwater resources.
3. The research investigates how braided river systems are connected to alluvial aquifers and how changes in braided rivers (bed elevation and width) affect leakage rates. This research helps to inform river management practices and environmental limits. This knowledge will enable river managers and decision-makers to understand the effect that different river engineering interventions have on groundwater recharge and enable rivers to be managed in a more holistic manner.
Strategic Fit
4. This work underpins actions and outcomes listed in the 2020-2025 Strategic Plan as things that the council will continue to do; and will do differently:
4.1. Water – the research by Lincoln Agritech has found that hydrologic functioning can be improved if rivers can be managed as a whole system. Rivers have traditionally been managed primarily for flood protection, and this has been at the expense of groundwater recharge, and potentially low-flow resilience (a proposed future research direction).
4.2. Land - managing rivers in a way that optimises the annual water balance, river flows and groundwater recharge will provide resilience to climate variability and change.
4.3. Biodiversity – the widening of river corridors not only improves hydrological function but also biodiversity
4.4. Infrastructure and Services – Much of the infrastructure for climate resilience is already in place (rivers and aquifers). HBRC has an opportunity to optimise existing natural infrastructure by simply changing river management.
Background
5. This research was driven by the need to better understand the interaction between braided rivers and groundwater resources. This gap in understanding was identified while investigating long-term declines in groundwater levels in the Wairau Aquifer (Wohling 2018). The declines could not be explained by the usual causes (pumping, changes in ERT, increased drainage) which lead to structural changes in the river being identified as the likely cause (Wohling et al. 2020). However, information on the interaction between braided river and aquifers settings was scarce which prompted a research proposal being submitted to the MBIE Endeavour Fund. HBRC has been involved from the start (initiated by Thomas Wilding).
What is the budget?
6. In 2019, Lincoln Agritech Ltd was awarded ~$8m in MBIE funding aimed at understanding the amount of water exchanged between braided river systems and underlying groundwater resources. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has provided a cash contribution of $50,000 in 2020/21 and in-kind contribution in the form of access to existing models, access to SkyTEM data, gauging support, and staff participation in workshops and advisory groups.
Who’s involved?
7. The programme includes experts from Lincoln Agritech Ltd, as well as NIWA, Lincoln University and its Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit (AERU), University of Canterbury, Waterways Centre for Freshwater Management, Flinders University (Australia), Technische Universität Dresden (Germany), and Aarhus University (Denmark).
What’s being collected and where?
8. The team has used novel approaches to characterise river losses, hyporheic exchange and parafluvial flow. Techniques include fibre optics for temperature sensing, geophysical techniques to measure ground resistivity, river bathymetry, thermal imagery, isotope analysis (radon) and advanced 3D hydrological modelling.
9. The research focuses on three case-study rivers:
9.1. Ngaruroro River (partners HBRC, Ngāti Kahungunu)
9.2. Selwyn/Wakirikiri River in Canterbury (partners Te Taumutu Rūnaka, ECan, and
9.3. Wairau River in Marlborough (partner MDC).
Discussion
10. The rivers, mainly along the east coast of New Zealand, are gravel-bedded rivers with multiple channels that live within a corridor, but the beds are constantly realigning and shifting depending on the flows and conditions.
11. Much of the work has focused on understanding sediment structure beneath the three study rivers. The gravels associated with braided rivers form some of the most permeable aquifers in the world, which poses the question of why these types of rivers don’t all dry up in the summer (some do, such as the Selwyn). We suspected that there must be a structural control on leakage from the river system, some kind of impedance layer which controls the rate of leakage.
12. In our field investigations which involved coring, sediment analysis, and a wide range of geophysical methods, we found that the gravels associated with all three braided rivers are very loose and have a high permeability because there is a lack of fine material (silt and clay). These gravel deposits can be mapped vertically and laterally along the river and are formed over time by the flooding process and associated sediment mobilisation. The surrounding and underlying deposits are by contrast more compact and have a higher silt and clay content, which is what impedes leakage from the river. Visually, we can identify what we are calling a “braidplain aquifer” in other rivers in NZ, and more recently seen this in rivers in France and Italy.
13. We have concluded that groundwater recharge does not occur directly from the river but is mediated by the braidplain aquifer. Healthy river function and groundwater recharge rates therefore depend on the integrity of this gravel reservoir. We think the implications for HBRC are in understanding how river management practices, such as gravel extraction and narrowing of the active river corridor, affect these processes (groundwater recharge and river function).
14. We have identified that all three of these recharge mechanisms have been compromised in the main recharge reach of the Ngaruroro due to the particular river engineering philosophy adopted in NZ during the 1950s-60s, and a more recent increase in demand for river gravel. We have also identified that the river recharge function can be restored, and even enhanced, if river management practices were changed. It’s important to note that this situation also applies to rivers in other regions of NZ.
Decision-making Process
15. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Cyclone Recovery Committee receives and notes the Lincoln Agritech Braided Rivers Recharge research project presentation.
Authored by:
Simon Harper Team Leader Hydrology & Groundwater Science |
|
Approved by:
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|
[1] https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/proposed-temporary-change-allow-mixed-waste-burning-east-coast-rural-land
[3] https://environment.govt.nz/what-government-is-doing/areas-of-work/recovering-from-recent-severe-weather-events/orders-in-council-to-help-communities-continue-their-recovery/
[4] Previously, the Severe Weather Emergency Legislation Act 2023 had amended provisions in the Resource Management Act relating to emergency work-related activities on rural land. Those amendments made many activities ‘deemed permitted activities’ if rules in regional plans would otherwise have required a resource consent for those activities. However the ‘deemed permitted activity’ amendments did not alter rules for prohibited activities.