Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council
Date: 31 May 2023
Time: 1.30pm
Venue: |
Council Chamber Hawke's Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street NAPIER |
Agenda
Item Title Page
1. Welcome/Karakia/Apologies/Notices
2. Conflict of Interest Declarations
3. Confirmation of Minutes of the Regional Council Meeting held on 26 April 2023
4. Call for minor items not on the Agenda 3
Decision Items
5. Report and recommendations from the Māori Committee 5
6. Report and recommendations from the Risk and Audit Sub-committee 7
7. Report and recommendations from the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee 13
8. Affixing of Common Seal 29
16. Committee membership changes (late item to come)
Information or Performance Monitoring
9. HBRC Cyclone Gabrielle response & recovery financials update 31
10. Report from the Regional Transport Committee 39
11. Report from the Regional Planning Committee 41
12. Strategic projects report to 30 April 2023 43
13. Significant organisational activities through June 2023 51
14. Discussion of minor items not on the Agenda
Decision Items (Public Excluded)
15. Appointment of independent HBRIC directors 61
31 May 2023
Subject: Call for minor items not on the Agenda
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the means for councillors to raise minor matters relating to the general business of the meeting they wish to bring to the attention of the meeting.
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council standing order 9.13 states:
2.1. A meeting may discuss an item that is not on the agenda only if it is a minor matter relating to the general business of the meeting and the Chairperson explains at the beginning of the public part of the meeting that the item will be discussed. However, the meeting may not make a resolution, decision or recommendation about the item, except to refer it to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.
Recommendations
3. That Council accepts the following Minor items not on the Agenda for discussion as Item 14.
Topic |
Raised by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leeanne Hooper Governance Team Leader |
Desiree Cull Strategy & Governance Manager |
31 May 2023
Subject: Report and recommendations from the Māori Committee
Reason for Report
1. This item provides a summary of discussions at the 3 May 2023 Māori Committee meeting along with recommendations for Council’s consideration and provides the opportunity for the Māori Committee Co-chairs to add additional context as they wish.
Discussion
2. The Māori Committee meeting was shortened to accommodate those wishing to attend the tangi for Pat Magill.
Agenda items
3. The Nomination of Māori Committee representatives to Council’s Committees item provided invited the Committee to appoint representatives to the Climate Action Joint Committee and the Cyclone Recovery Committee.
4. The regular Take Ripoata ā Takiwā – Taiwhenua Representatives' updates item normally provides the Committee with local information from each Taiwhenua however, due to time constraints was not discussed on 3 May.
5. The Cyclone Gabrielle – response, recovery and reviews item provided the Committee with an update on Cyclone Gabrielle’s impacts and the HBRC response,including:
5.1. Size and scale of the natural disaster – National State of Emergency, rainfall well beyond forecast, and 5.3km stopbank breaches
5.2. Flooding extent in most affected areas - shown on maps
5.3. Loss of lifelines – power, telecommunications and roading
5.4. Restoration of 113 rain and river level monitoring sites across the region
5.5. Regional coordination of waste disposal – silt, wood, animal carcasses, posts and wire
5.6. 160 people and 17 self-contained pods working up rivers to clear and repair rivers, streams, and drains
6. A workshop was requested, about HBRC’s flood control and drainage schemes and how they operate to prepare for community engagement being undertaken as part of the review of HBRC flood and drainage asset performance during the Cyclone.
Decision Making Process
7. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
7.1. Given the items were specifically considered by the Māori Committee on 3 May 2023, Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions without consulting directly with the community in accordance with the following recommendations made by the Māori Committee.
Recommendations
The Māori Committee recommends that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and notes the Report and recommendations from the Māori Committee.
2. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy, and that Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community or persons likely to have an interest in the decision.
Nomination of Māori Committee representatives to Council’s committees
3. Confirms the appointments of representatives of the Māori Committee, being:
3.1. Roger Maaka and Paul Kelly as members of the Climate Action Joint Committee, and Marei Apatu as alternate.
3.2. Katarina Kawana and Peter Eden as members of the Cyclone Recovery Committee.
Authored by:
Peter Martin Senior Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
|
There are no attachments for this report.
31 May 2023
Subject: Report and recommendations from the Risk and Audit Sub-committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Risk and Audit Sub-committee (RAS) on 10 May 2022 and are now presented for the Council’s information alongside any additional commentary the Sub-committee Chair wishes to offer.
Agenda items
2. The Confirmation of the Risk & Audit Sub-committee Terms of Reference item considered the Terms of Reference adopted by Council on 16 November 2022, and discussions covered:
2.1. reporting lines for the sub-committee should be direct to Council
2.2. the advice of the Auditor General is that Risk and Audit committees should be chaired by an independent person
2.3. meetings should be quarterly to feed into audit processes, twice a year is not sufficient
2.4. the purpose of RAS is to cover financial and non-financial risks
2.5. it is timely to carry out a review of the Terms of Reference for RAS in order to have a new ToR resolved by Council on 28 June and in effect at the beginning of the 2023-24 financial year.
3. The 2022-2023 Enterprise Internal Audit Plan update and proposed 2023-2024 plan item presented an updated 2022-2024 Audit Universe updating the status of internal audits on the 2022-23 plan and identifying proposed reviews and audits for inclusion on the 2023-24 plan. Additional detail (type of review, scope commencement date, etc) is attached as requested by the sub-committee. Through discussions, the sub-committee agreed that the Health and Safety Audit intended to have been carried out in the 2022-23 financial year will now be completed by October 2023.
4. The Treasury Compliance Report for the period 1 January - 31 March 2023 item reported on compliance monitoring of HBRC Treasury activity and the performance of Council’s investment portfolio.
5. The Organisational Change Consolidation and Prioritisation Internal Audit findings item presented the draft internal audit report and advised that a completed internal audit report with actions approved by the Executive Leadership Team will be presented to the next RAS.
6. The Audit Plan for the 2022-2023 Annual Report presented by Ernst Young noted that the audit of the Annual Report has commenced and that it is expected the Annual Report audit will be completed in time for HBRC to meet the 31 October statutory deadline.
7. The six-monthly Enterprise Risk Report item considered in a Public Excluded session presented HBRC’s key residual risks as of April 2023 and highlighted:
7.1. There are nine high rated residual risks – an increase of eight risks since the August 2022 report. This heightened risk profile was largely attributed to the direct impact Cyclone Gabrielle has had on HBRC since 14 February 2023. The Chair of the RAS requested that an additional risk of public safety be considered and how this is embedded within our framework.
7.2. Staff are proactively managing the cyclone-related high risks by integrating risk impacts into Cyclone Gabrielle key response and recovery decisions. Consequently, at least five of the newly-reported high risks will reduce to medium over the next quarter.
7.3. The RAS noted the elevated Legal Compliance risk and requested a remediation plan to reduce this risk be presented at the next RAS meeting.
8. The RAS queried the scope and performance of the risk policy and framework and requested a workshop, both internally to improve understanding, but engagement with an external local government risk expert to ensure our risks are fit for purpose and Council has an opportunity for top-down risk understanding. The workshop will work through the current risk policy and framework to identify potential areas for improvement.
9. The Internal Assurance corrective actions update item, considered in a Public Excluded session, noted that in general, progress is being made by the business to close out actions from previous internal audits and that further work is to be carried out to close down long-standing actions.
10. The Privacy event item considered in a Public Excluded session advised of a potential privacy issue that occurred during the Cyclone Gabrielle and noted that, to date, the investigation into the issue has not identified any actual information breach. Under advice from HBRC’s Legal Counsel, notification of the potential breach was sent to the Privacy Commissioner on 19 April 2023, and HBRC Legal Counsel has updated the Commission with remediation steps identified, in progress and completed. The Commission verbally advised it was satisfied with the remediation plan presented by Legal Counsel.
Decision Making Process
11. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
11.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset, nor is it inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
11.2. The use of the special consultative procedure is not prescribed by legislation.
11.3. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
11.4. Councils may appoint the committees, subcommittees, and other subordinate decision-making bodies that they consider appropriate, including joint committees (LGA sch.7 cl. 30(1)(a)).
11.5. The items were specifically considered by the Risk and Audit Sub-committee on 10 May 2023.
11.6. Given the provisions above, the Council can exercise its discretion and make these decisions without consulting with the community or others having an interest in the decisions.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and notes the Report from the Risk and Audit Sub-committee staff report.
2. Requests that staff carry out a review of the Terms of Reference for the Audit and Risk Sub-committee in accordance with:
2.1. advice from the Office of the Auditor General, including that the Chair should be independent
2.2. the Sub-committee reporting directly to Council
2.3. the purpose of RAS which is to cover financial and non-financial risks
2.4. presenting a proposed Terms of Reference for Council adoption on 28 June 2023.
3. Receives and accepts the additional information provided by staff to support the proposed 2023-2024 plan and confirms that the 2023-2024 Audit and Assurance Plan includes:
3.1. Data Analytics Internal Audit
3.2. An independent review of HBRC Flood Protection and Drainage Schemes’ performance during Cyclone Gabrielle
3.3. A review of the HB CDEM Group Cyclone Gabrielle response – lessons learnt
3.4. Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme review
3.5. Cyclone Gabrielle flood report
3.6. HBRC internal review – timeline of events
3.7. Telemetry Resilience review
3.8. Hydrometric review.
Authored by:
Olivia Giraud-Burrell Quality & Assurance Advisor |
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
Helen Marsden Risk & Corporate Compliance Manager |
Andrew Siddles Chief Information Officer |
Approved by:
Susie Young Group Manager Corporate Services |
|
1⇩ |
HBRC's Assurance Universe as at 1 May 2023 |
|
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Report and recommendations from the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee (Joint Committee) on 12 May 2022 and are now presented for the Council’s consideration alongside any additional commentary the Joint Committee Chair wishes to offer.
Agenda items
2. The administrative items considered by the Joint Committee included acceptance of the Terms of Reference as amended with changes recommended by the Technical Advisory Group, and the Joint Committee resolved:
2.1. The Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee confirms this Terms of Reference (attached) for adoption to the three Partner Councils.
3. The Joint Committee also confirmed its members for the new triennium, and the elected deputy chairs Cr Hayley Browne from Napier City Council and Cr Alwyn Corban from Hastings District Council.
4. The Timing for Strategy notification item discussed the timeframe for notifying the proposed Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy in August 2023. This timeframe was designed to enable HBRC to incorporate the outcomes of the strategy notification process into its 2024 Long Term Plan.
5. Following Cyclone Gabrielle, the February and April 2023 Joint Committee meetings were cancelled and capacity within Partner Councils has been severely constrained. As a result, an August 2023 notification for the Strategy cannot be achieved.
6. Taking into account a range of factors discussed in the paper, three new process/timing options for Strategy notification were presented and assessed:
6.1. Option 1: Long Term Plan Alignment (April 2024)
6.2. Option 2: Standalone Consultation (August 2024)
6.3. Option 3: Annual Plan Alignment (March 2025)
7. The paper recommended Option 2, and this was endorsed by the Joint Committee.
8. Further discussion resulted in a recommendation that HBRC consider incorporating a funding provision for the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy into its upcoming Long Term Plan.
9. The primary reason for this recommendation was a concern that the delayed Strategy notification process would mean that outcomes could not be incorporated directly into HBRC’s LTP, further delaying Strategy implementation.
10. The full report is provided as Attachment 2 for reference.
11. The following additional items were considered in the same Joint Committee meeting:
11.1. Overview of the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy which provided context background to the Strategy development process, and discussion on current workstreams.
11.2. Project Manager's update which provided a status update on the Strategy from a project management perspective, noting critical risks around timeframes in particular given that the August 2023 target for notification would no longer be met.
11.3. Communication and engagement update which summarised engagement activity since late 2022 and that a new communications and engagement plan was in development
11.4. Current coastal projects update which provided status updates on key coastal projects that Joint Committee are tracking.
Decision Making Process
12. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded:
12.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset, nor is it inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
12.2. The use of the special consultative procedure is not prescribed by legislation.
12.3. The decision is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy.
12.4. The items were specifically considered by the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee on 12 May 2023.
12.5. Given the provisions above, the Council can exercise its discretion and make these decisions without consulting with the community or others having an interest in the decision.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Receives and notes the Report and recommendations from the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee staff report.
2. Adopts the amended Terms of Reference (attached) for the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee.
3. Accepts the recommendations of the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
3.1. Delays notification of the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy for consultation to August/ September 2024.
3.2. Considers incorporating a funding provision for the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy into its 2024-2034 Long Term Plan.
Authored by:
Simon Bendall Coastal Hazards Strategy Project Manager |
Monique Thomsen Executive Assistant |
Approved by:
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
|
1⇩ |
2023 Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee ToR for adoption |
|
|
2⇩ |
Timing for strategy notification 12 May 2023 agenda item |
|
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Affixing of Common Seal
Reason for Report
1. The Common Seal of the Council has been affixed to the following documents and signed by the Chair or Deputy Chair and Chief Executive or a Group Manager.
|
|
Seal No. |
Date |
1.1 |
Staff Warrants 1.1.1 S. Jorgensen K. Halbert (Delegations under Resource Management Act 1991 (Sections 34A(1) and 38(1); Maritime Transport Act 1994 (Section 33G(a); Building Act 2004 (Section 317B); Biosecurity Act 1993 (Sections 103 and 105); Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 (s.86-92) and Local Government Act 2002 (Section 177))
|
4545 4546 |
16 May 2023 16 May 2023 |
2. The Common Seal is used twice during a Leasehold Land Sale, once on the Sale and Purchase Agreement and once on the Land Transfer document. More often than not, there is a delay between the second issue (Land Transfer document) of the Common Seal per property. This delay could result in the second issue of the Seal not appearing until the following month.
3. As a result of sales, the current numbers of Leasehold properties owned by Council are:
3.1. No cross-lease properties were sold, with 63 remaining on Council’s books.
3.2. No single leasehold properties were sold, with 75 remaining on Council’s books.
Decision Making Process
4. Council is required to make every decision in accordance with the provisions of Sections 77, 78, 80, 81 and 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within these sections of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded the following:
4.1. Sections 97 and 88 of the Act do not apply
4.2. Council can exercise its discretion under Section 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Act and make a decision on this issue without conferring directly with the community or others due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided
4.3. That the decision to apply the Common Seal reflects previous policy or other decisions of Council which (where applicable) will have been subject to the Act’s required decision-making process.
Recommendations
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council:
1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted Significance and Engagement Policy, and that Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community or persons likely to have an interest in the decision.
2. Confirms the action to affix the Common Seal.
Authored by:
Diane Wisely Executive Assistant |
Vanessa Fauth Finance Manager |
Approved by:
Bill Bayfield Interim Chief Executive |
|
31 May 2023
Subject: HBRC Cyclone Gabrielle response & recovery financials update
Reason for Report
1. This item provides Council with an outline of:
1.1. Costs incurred to date by Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, with insight on areas of material spend and how these are funded, and
1.2. Risks and issues arising from these activities.
Background
2. Costs of Cyclone Gabrielle including the Civil Defence Response are the responsibility of HBRC to manage and administer.
3. Each year HBRC receives $2.9m as a targeted rate applied specifically for the purposes of Emergency Management. Prior to the cyclone the Emergency Management Reserve was $800k overdrawn. This was already due to be discussed and a proposal to address developed.
4. As at 19 May 2023, HBRC has incurred over $47.5m in costs associated with the CDEM response, HBRC’s own response and the subsequent recovery work.
5. Reimbursement of eligible costs incurred will occur through Government. The Government, in accordance with Section 33 of the Guide to the National CDEM Plan will fund eligible welfare, other response and recovery-related costs incurred by a local authority:
5.1. Eligible welfare (response) costs will be 100 per cent funded by the Government. E.g., caring for directly affected people (accommodating, transporting, feeding, and clothing people as a result of an emergency).
5.2. Eligible other response costs will be 60 per cent funded by the Government (above the local authority’s threshold) and 40 per cent funded by the local authority. E.g., precautions or preventive actions to reduce immediate danger to human life, where those precautions or actions were begun during the response period or immediately before the emergency.
5.3. Eligible recovery costs will be 60 per cent funded by the Government (above the local authority’s threshold) and 40 per cent funded by the local authority. E.g., Essential infrastructure recovery repairs.
6. Infrastructure costs are claimable via two avenues being:
6.1. NEMA response (60%) – as per above, and
6.2. Insurance cover.
7. Insurance cover exists for infrastructure, material damage and business interruption and Forestry to a total sum insured value of $358m.
8. A draft breakdown of costs and how these are likely to be funded is included in attachment 1. Please note this is a work in progress as we get more information from Government and other agencies and progress our NEMA and insurance claims.
Analysis of Spend (as at 19 May 2023)
CDEM Costs
9. Officers believe costs incurred for CDEM have now mostly been accounted for by way of purchase order and actual spend and don’t believe any further material costs are likely to be incurred outside of the $10.75m estimated total spend.
10. The Finance team are in the process of applying for reimbursement of Welfare costs from NEMA. Two applications for reimbursement have been submitted (total $2.5m). NEMA have approved 41% of these costs within those claims to date.
11. The major issues HBRC are having with reimbursement pertain to key themes of set up and record keeping. When costs were being incurred in the initial phases of our response, no consideration of the subsequent NEMA claims process was a focus, ( despite being aware of the rules) therefore significant retrospective work and challenge has been occurring specifically in the below areas.
Generators
11.1. The GECC has incurred significant costs acquiring generators from across NZ. From the outset of the Cyclone Gabrielle response, providing power through generators was a top priority. How these generators were allocated and the record keeping associated with the movement of these generators was, with hindsight, poorly disciplined. In some instances generators were allocated to entities who should not have received them through GECC, e.g. Miracle Water and Lineage Logistics.
11.2. In addition, for example over $140k has been paid to a supplier for a 500kva generator delivered to a critical distribution company that staff now claim was never used.
11.3. NEMA has declined costs incurred by the GECC setting up generators for rest homes and pharmacies. Potentially, with hindsight, the GECC should not have provided these services, but the GECC staff making the decisions at this time were focused on the welfare and medical needs of the citizens of Hawke’s Bay rather than who was subsequently going to be paying these costs.
11.4. It is not possible with the records kept, that HBRC can say with certainty where every generator was allocated and for what period. We are attempting to recover costs that the GECC incurred on behalf of commercial entities where this can be clearly established.
Distribution Centre and Bridge Pa Aerodrome Costs
11.5. The GECC has incurred significant costs setting up and running these facilities. Due to the widespread scale of the devastation caused by Cyclone Gabrielle, it was not possible to meet the welfare needs of the isolated/remote communities without these facilities. Section 33 eligibility criteria needs to be applied with this in mind, including the security and traffic management costs incurred.
Helicopter costs
11.6. During the declared emergency period FENZ coordinated flights from Bridge Pa and the Distribution Centre. A number of flights instructed through NEMA during the event are subsequently being declined for reimbursement. E.g MSD. These entities are, in turn, arguing back with HBRC that the GECC should be paying. As an example, the MSD flew staff on numerous flights to visit their clients. We have attempted the process of recovering these costs from the MSD and as a result we have been met by significant resistance.
11.7. NEMA have rejected a standby cost claim for a contracted helicopter company. Standby costs are critical in order to be able to ensure a swift response to life critical situations. This situation has now involved lawyers for the Commercial helicopter operator.
11.8. FENZ and NEMA used Cyclone Gabrielle to trial a new approach to managing flights, which has demonstrated shortcomings in the methodology especially when it comes to reconciling the amounts charged to tasks undertaken. HBRC are finding it extremely difficult to reconcile the costs incurred to the tasks undertaken. HBRC believe the cost of helicopters commissioned by FENZ should be met by NEMA less any costs we are able to recover from commercial entities. This is being discussed at senior levels with NEMA.
12. In addition to the above, we are aware of further legal advice that has been sought by a large supplier who believes that work undertaken by their specific company in assisting with Cyclone Gabrielle should be reimbursed by GECC or NEMA, despite this technically not been part of Section 33 costs.
13. Any shortfall of non-reimbursement will be carried as an operational cost to our rate payers. Shortfalls will be funded by loan funding.
Infrastructure repairs
14. Early on in our response, to enable rapid response to infrastructure on Day 1, HBRC deployed all current staff and machinery from the Works Group to respond immediately to restore stop banks and ensure our drainage pump stations resumed operations, albeit on generator and manual man-power operations.
15. NEMA advised HBRC that Works Group costs are not claimable Under Section 33 of the Civil Defence reimbursement framework given Works Group is an internal Council cost. Council costs are outside the eligibility criteria under section 33. This is resulting in $3m, to date, that is not claimable through the Cyclone. This could be raised in insurance purposes however no proactive actions have been taken to address as yet.
16. To date, as per below, $27,365k has been spent on infrastructure repairs across an array of our assets.
Insurance
17. Currently we have claims in progress under our Material Damage & Business Interruption Policy, Infrastructure Policy and Commercial Fleet Policy.
18. Material Damage & Business Interruption (MDBI) is currently made up of damage to our Pump Stations, Plant Equipment (including hired equipment) and Hydrology monitoring assets. We estimate the total claim amount to be in excess of $10m. We have received a progress payment of $250k to date against this policy.
19. The Pump Station assets and extra response costs we may have in relation to our Flood Critical Assets are able to be fully claimed under this MDBI policy and anything over and above our sum insured amount here are also covered by NEMA up to 60%. Ascertaining the exact cover is difficult at this point, however, we are provisioning for a small shortfall here in particular around the extra costs incurred to keep our pump stations working.
Infrastructure Policy
20. We have begun the insurance claim for this policy and have been focusing on the high value items as a priority. We are in the process of compiling the detailed information regarding our Stopbank repairs and have received a progress payment of $4m in recognition of $10m of damage to these assets to date. We are expecting the total costs to exceed policy limits and similar to paragraph 18. The costs over and above for Flood critical assets are covered 60% by NEMA. We are provisioning for a shortfall currently of $11m which was included in our budget bids through the Recovery Agency.
21. We are not expecting a claim against our Forestry assets at this time based on initial assessments.
Borrowing Undertaken
22. Since the Cyclone we have undertaken borrowing of $35m.
23. Prior to the Cyclone we had been forecasting borrowing of approximately $20m until June 2023.
24. We have borrowed this $35m in four separate loans with $25m on short term finance (180 days) while we assess future debt forecasts and what funding is available to come back in.
25. We envisage short-term borrowing to be repaid by NEMA and insurance payments.
26. We are currently looking at our maximum debt capacity calculations with PwC in anticipation of required debt profiling to support our Long Term Plan including HBRC capacity for any co-funding requirements by central government.
Decision-making Process
27. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the HBRC Cyclone Gabrielle response & recovery financials update staff report.
Authored by:
Jess Bennett Senior Manager - Finance Recovery |
Chelsea Spencer Senior Group Accountant |
Chris Comber Chief Financial Officer |
|
Approved by:
Susie Young Group Manager Corporate Services |
|
1⇩ |
Cyclone Gabrielle Cost and Funding Summary 24 May 2023 |
|
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Report from the Regional Transport Committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Regional Transport Committee (RTC) on 12 May 2023 and are now presented for Council’s consideration alongside any additional commentary that the Chair of the meeting, Councillor Jerf van Beek, wishes to offer.
Agenda items
2. The Committee heard a deputation from HB Airport, seeking another road access point (roundabout) at the northern end of the airport. The Committee supported the proposal which will be included in the Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) process.
3. The Regional Transport Committee Terms of Reference (ToR) and member appointments item was of an administrative nature, and provided the means for the Committee to confirm its membership.
4. The NZTA Regional Relations Director’s update item provided an update on roading repairs and construction being undertaken in the wake of Cyclone Gabrielle and highlighted:
4.1. Cyclone repairs are being carried out by an alliance of specific contractors to expedite work
4.2. A draft SH5 Speed Reduction Impact Study (by Ernst & Young) is being considered by Waka Kotahi at present and will be released soon.
5. The Regional Transport Programme May 2023 update item is a regular feature which updates the committee on the various workstreams being undertaken by the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) including speed management and Transport Emissions Reduction planning.
6. The Regional Land Transport Plan (RLTP) investment and delivery update item allowed Committee members to consider and set the strategic direction and guidelines for the upcoming review of the RLTP and agree that:
6.1. A new KPI that there is a functioning roading network is added to the Investment Logic Map (ILM) for the RLTP, and aiming for resilience to have a 60% weighting.
6.2. If the Hastings MyWay bus service trial is viewed as successful, then the Napier MyWay could be included in the RLTP with TAG incorporating specifics for Napier beforehand instead of having a trial.
7. The Regional Road Safety update item provided an update on the implementation of RoadSafe Hawke’s Bay’s (RSHB) new strategic direction and ‘by the community, for the community, within the community’ approach to delivering road safety education and interventions including a full rebrand encompassing a new visual identity, a new brand message, tone of voice, and creative approach.
8. The Public Transport update item provided statistics and other details of public transport services in HB that have been affected by Cyclone Gabrielle.
9. The Cyclone Gabrielle recovery update from KiwiRail item allowed KiwiRail to provide a comprehensive overview of where Cyclone Gabrielle has damaged the rail network and what their rebuilding plans are. As well, the Committee took the opportunity to remind KiwiRail that it continues to advocate for the full reinstatement of the Napier to Gisborne rail line.
10. The Verbal updates by Advisory Representatives commentary largely related to commending Waka Kotahi and associated entities on the quick response to the roading damage caused by Cyclone Gabrielle.
Decision Making Process
11. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Report from the Regional Transport Committee.
Authored by:
Bryce Cullen Transport Strategy & Policy Analyst |
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
Approved by:
Katrina Brunton Group Manager Policy & Regulation |
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Report from the Regional Planning Committee
Reason for Report
1. This item provides a summary of discussions at the 17 May 2023 Regional Planning Committee (RPC) meeting and the opportunity for the Co-Chair to add additional context as they wish.
Agenda items for decision
2. The RPC tangata whenua representation on Council’s committees item invited the RPC to nominate PSGE appointed members as members of the HBRC Cyclone Recovery (up to 2) and Corporate and Strategic (1) committees and the Climate Action Joint Committee (up to 2 plus 1 alternate) established by the five Hawke’s Bay councils. This item was withdrawn
3. The Fresh water Management Units item sought the Committee’s recommendation to the Regional Council that the six described Fresh Water Management Units be adopted however consideration of the item and associated decisions was deferred to the next scheduled RPC meeting.
Agenda items for information
4. The following agenda items were provided to the RPC for information only as summarised following.
5. The Cyclone Gabrielle – Response, Recovery and Reviews item presented work being undertaken in the aftermath of Cyclone Gabrielle. It was agreed that a letter will be sent to NEMA regarding the inadequate MetService rain forecasting prior to the cyclone under the signatures of the RPC Co-chairs.
6. The May 2023 Policy Projects update item presented an outline of projects involving reviews and/or changes under the Resource Management Act 1991 to the Hawke’s Bay Resource Management Plan.
7. The Kotahi Plan verbal update item noted that work on this project had been paused due to the impacts of the Cyclone Gabrielle response and recovery on the community and on staff resourcing.
8. The May 2023 Statutory Advocacy update item presented updates on statutory advocacy projects Council is currently engaged in. This included national legislative and policy proposals, the Central Hawke’s Bay District Plan review and other resource management proposals.
Decision Making Process
9. Council and its committees are required to make every decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements in relation to this item and have concluded that, given the items were specifically considered by the Regional Planning Committee on 17 May 2023, and this report is for information only, Council can exercise its discretion and make decisions without consulting directly with the community or others having an interest in those decisions.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Report and recommendations from the Regional Planning Committee.
Authored by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
Jack Smith-Ballingall Manager, Central & Internal Relationships |
Approved by:
Pieri Munro Te Pou Whakarae |
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Strategic projects report to 30 April 2023
Reason for Report
1. This agenda item presents the Project Management Office’s (PMO) Strategic projects report for April 2023 for information.
2. HBRC’s key strategic projects are tracked by the Project Management Office (PMO) and reported monthly throughout their lifecycle. These projects were selected because of their significance in terms of investment, risks, benefits, and interdependencies.
Points of Interest
3. Three new strategic projects have been added by the HBRC’s Executive Leadership Team for monthly PMO tracking:
3.1. HBRC Recovery Programme
3.2. Recovery Claims – Insurance
3.3. Recovery Claims – NEMA
4. Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy has been moved to quarterly reporting due to the recommendation from the Joint Committee not to consult in 2023. Next report due June 2023.
Key
*Risk status is inherent (e.g. prior to mitigations and controls implemented) vs residual.
Performance Indicators (RAG): u= Off Track, n = At Risk, l = On Track
Status Change over last 6 months: how the status has tracked between September 2022 and March 2023.
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
||||||
1. HBRC Recovery Programme (Monthly reporting) |
l |
u |
n |
New strategic project |
||||||
Project summary: The Recovery Programme coordinates and tracks recovery planning and community communication and engagement activities across HBRC. This connects and aligns this work under the Hawke’s Bay Regional Recovery framework. Under this framework HBRC will be the lead agency for the Environmental Resilience pou, the supporting agency for the Primary Sector pou, and will input into relevant workstreams under the other pou that will make up the Regional Recovery Plans. |
||||||||||
1.1 HBRC Recovery Team was formed on 27 March 2023. Recovery workstream leads and supporting teams were identified and linked into the framework set by the HB Regional Recovery Agency (HBRRA). All councils were asked to develop first editions of Locality Plans and an HBRC Environmental Resilience Plan by 28 April 2023. 1.2 These plans will inform the development of a region-wide recovery plan. Recovery initiatives were identified and cost estimates provided to HBRRA for funding application to central government and to quantify the cost of recovery priorities in the region. 1.3 The first edition of the Environmental Resilience Plan was completed and submitted to HBRRA within the given deadline, of 28 April 2023. A supporting financial bids spreadsheet was also submitted to HBRRA on 14 April 2023. 1.4 Recovery budget allocation still being determined. 1.5 Risks are around lack of clarity, transparency and consistent guidance from HBRRA. Tight timeline to produce plan not allowing sufficient scoping of recovery initiatives and potentially funding needs were missed. 1.6 Added pressure and workload on teams to support and produce outputs within very tight deadlines set by HBRRA and central government Recovery resourcing. 1.7 The Recovery Team aims to scope and develop a plan for the Recovery Programme of work to provide a structured approach to guide HBRC teams involved in recovery. 1.8 An internal comms and engagement plan being developed will also support this work. 1.9 Teams will then need to reprioritise to balance BAU and recovery activities, and identify resourcing gaps. Weekly meetings are set up to keep teams up-to-date and engaged in the process. |
||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
||||||
2. Recovery Claims - Insurance (Monthly reporting) |
n/a |
l |
n/a |
New strategic project |
||||||
Project summary: This is a project to recover asset and business interruption losses arising from the impacts of Cyclone Gabrielle and how we will maximise recovery of costs to replace assets through our insurance policies. |
||||||||||
2.1 Three resources have been brought on board and will be in place to manage insurance claims from 1 June. 2.2 Loss adjusters have been on site and taken engineers across Hawke’s Bay for scoping exercise. 2.3 Project team is establishing high-level timelines, estimates of total losses and recoverability via insurance. 2.4 A portal for collation of required information has been established to capture engineer reports, photos, loss information. 2.5 A prepayment of insurance of $4.25M has been proactively given to HBRC by Insurance. |
||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
||||||
3. Recovery Claims - NEMA (Monthly reporting) |
n/a |
n |
n/a |
New strategic project |
||||||
Project summary: This is a project to recover costs incurred through CDEM response (and HBRC) including response costs for infrastructure. |
||||||||||
CDEM: 3.1 Total CDEM costs incurred have been circa $11M to date. 3.2 Three claims have been processed through to NEMA ($1.28M). Of this the first claim has been approved. (44% of claims to date). 3.3 Significant negative responses and threats of legal action have been received from helicopter operators. Due to the nature of the invoicing and checking required for NEMA reimbursement, considerable time has been taken to validate flights and descriptions of eligibility. Infrastructure 3.4 No claims have been progressed for infrastructure costs to date. Careful management and co-ordination will be required with the insurance claim management. |
||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
||||||
4. IRG Flood Control & Drainage Programme (Monthly reporting) |
u |
n |
u |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
||||
Project summary: Project 1: Heretaunga Flood Control & Drainage Scheme We are reviewing and upgrading flood protection assets across the Tūtaekurī, Ngaruroro, Lower Tukituki and Clive rivers, to increase flood protection across the scheme from a 1 in 100 to a 1 in 500-year event. Project 2: Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme: Gravel Extraction We are removing gravel from the Upper Tukituki River to improve flood protection in Central Hawke’s Bay. Decreased demand for gravel has seen a build-up of gravel (aggradation). Extracting gravel from the riverbeds helps increase river capacity and reduces the risk of water inundation of neighbouring properties during a flood |
||||||||||
4.1 This work programme is on hold following Cyclone Gabrielle with response efforts taking priority. 4.2 Risks are around the funding deadline (November 2023) meaning programmes of work are running out of time. As IRG work recommences, wet/winter conditions are likely to impact on progress. |
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
5. Kotahi Plan (Monthly reporting) |
u |
u |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|
||||||||||||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Project summary: Developing a combined resource management plan for the Hawke’s Bay region. It will refresh how we manage the use and protection our natural and physical resources looking at all aspects of the environment. This includes land and freshwater, air, the coastal and marine area, climate change, biodiversity, urban form and development, natural hazards and risks, energy, transport, and infrastructure. Kotahi will combine and update the existing Regional Policy Statement, the Regional Resource Management Plan, and the Regional Coastal Environment Plan into one, while also giving effect to the new policies, planning and technical standards from central government. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
5.1 We are currently focusing efforts on the recovery which is necessary post Cyclone Gabrielle. As such the work which was programmed for Kotahi (the review of the Regional Policy Statement, Regional Resource Management Plan, Regional Coastal Environment Plan, including the freshwater policy development), has by and large been paused while staff resources have been re-prioritised to initial emergency response and now to the next phase of recovery. 5.2 We acknowledge that there is still much to be done in this policy development space, but are cognisant of the needs of both mana whenua and the community who have been severely impacted by the cyclone and recognise the importance of allowing time for everyone to focus on the pressing matters of rebuilding, recovering and supporting whanau and community. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
6. Land for Life (Monthly reporting) |
n |
n |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|||||||||||||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Project summary: A pilot on up to five farms with loans offered to landowners to plant trees on marginal land that can earn a return and enhance regenerative farming practices. Run in collaboration with The Nature Conservancy and the Ministry for Primary Industries to accelerate erosion control work and extend the programme to more farms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 The repositioning efforts, farmer availability and consultancy capacity have delayed the project by several months. This is regarded as a positive so as to align with recovery efforts. 6.2 Financial modelling, business case development and scale-up planning continue. 6.3 The project is working with the catchment management team to overcome farmer engagement challenges, which are now progressing. 6.4 Despite repositing and delays, the project is running under budget with surplus funds being available to support repositioning of the project and scale up efforts under guidance from the project's Steering Group, and MPI efforts to scale up pole nursery capacity and consider planting requirements. 6.5 We continue to partner with organisations involved in developing lower cost methods for planting natives. 6.6 The risks are farmer engagement around farm plans, and financial models that are the critical tasks since they inform Business Case development. Also the capacity within the HBRC, The Nature Conservatory and MPI to complete the Business Case before the end of June. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
7. Regional Water Security Programme (Monthly reporting) |
n |
u |
n |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|||||||||||||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Project summary: Investigating water supply options aiming to ensure Hawke’s Bay has long-term, climate-resilient, and secure supplies of freshwater for all. This supports the Kotahi Plan and includes: exploring above ground, medium-scale water storage options in the Ngaruroro catchment for and on behalf of the community setting up a Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR) trial in Central Hawke’s Bay to determine whether MAR is a viable water storage option and can contribute to water security in the area We will also work with water users to drive more efficient and effective use to complement water storage following the completion of a comprehensive 40-year Regional Water Assessment. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
7.1 CHB Managed Aquifer Recharge (MAR): Review of draft consent conditions is underway. Technical review including proposed amendments is now complete. Input from mana whenua will be sought to ensure the cultural partnership is reflected appropriately in the consents to support and enduring relationship. Consent decision (potentially end of May) will be public, and communications are being prepared in advance in conjunction with key partners and stakeholders. Implementation/construction planning is progressing in parallel to consent process now we have the confidence a consent will be secured. The project continues to be exposed to the inflationary pressures, and budgets will need to be closely managed during the final design and construction phase. 7.2 Heretaunga Water Storage: Technical investigations on the alternate dam alignment at the preferred dam site are in the final stages with a draft report to be issued at the end of May/beginning of June. This will be technically peer reviewed before a recommendation paper is brought to Council in August/September for decisions on whether to commit to a full feasibility study or not. Funding will need to be secured to commit this project to a full feasibility study. A submission was made through the Regional Council resilience plan and will be prepared in more detail in September if the Council decision is to progress the development work to a feasibility phase. The terrestrial ecologist will be revisiting the site post-cyclone to provide initial observations as an addendum to their prefeasibility findings and assessment. Flow monitoring is being reinstated at the site having been swept away during the cyclone. 7.3 Regional Water Assessment: Revisions of the final Regional Water Assessment report have been completed post-cyclone and this report will be presented to Council in June when it will be released as a public report. An easy-to-read summary will also be released. A Water Demand Assessment report has been significantly delayed. Pressure is being applied to get this report completed by the end of the June 2023 and aims to provide a series of recommendations for potential water demand interventions. Separate funding has been allocated to progress recommendations that maybe prioritised. 7.4 Timelines have slipped due to a number of factors. All three projects continue to progress with the Regional Water Assessment and CHB MAR both achieving important milestones, and the conclusion of a significant body of technical work for Heretaunga Water Security due mid-year. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
8. Farm Environmental Management Plans (FEMP) (Monthly reporting) |
l |
n |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|||||||||||||||
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||||||||||||||||
Project summary: These aim to address environmental outcomes and actions to improve environmental performance on properties over 4 hectares initially within the Tukituki region in three-yearly submission cycles. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
8.1 Auditing has begun, with 20 properties having a desktop assessment carried out. Feedback was provided to landowners after field assessments from November. 8.2 Legal advice supported HBRC approach to auditing and mandatory requirement for properties to undertake a FEMP audit. 8.3 We are awaiting final national regulations, due in May, for national farm plans, and Orders-in-Council to determine the next steps and timeframes for Tukituki, and regionwide roll out of freshwater farm plans. 8.4 Properties without a FEMP have been identified and are the main risk. This sits with the Compliance Team to follow up. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||||||||||||||||
9. Transport Choices (Monthly reporting) |
l |
n |
l |
|
F/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sch |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Risk |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Bud |
l |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Project summary: HBRC secured funding of $1.39 million from central government to upgrade eight bus stops in the region and create two new stops. The funding is part of a Transport Choices package included in the Government’s Climate Emergency Response Fund (CERF) led by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
9.1 The project is moving into the design with communications & engagement, and monitoring & evaluation plan ready for sign off by Waka Kotahi. The plans are largely templated for delivery assurance purposes. 9.2 Despite delays due to the impact of Cyclone Gabrielle, Waka Kotahi has allocated additional time to the schedule of work. 9.3 Once we have a costing for design implementation, a claim will be made for the funds once completed. 9.4 As the project is only just moving into the design phase, the budget is on track. 9.5 Risks are delays due to unavailable internal and external resources. This is not currently an issue, but presents a risk to the development of the project, as there is a strict timeline for completion. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||
10. Revenue & Financing Policy/ Rates Review (Monthly reporting) |
l |
n |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Project summary: First principles review of our Revenue and Financing Policy, and full review of our rating system. The aim is to improve transparency for who pays what, ensure legal compliance, simplify the Policy and provide more flexibility in applying the Policy. Consultation is planned to take place towards the end of 2023 prior to the next Long-Term Plan when the amounts rated for many Council services will likely change. |
|||||||||||
10.1 Work has progressed on preparing for stage two workshops with Council. 10.2 Project is tracking in line with revised timeline. 10.3 Main risk is staff availability given other workloads. Employing additional staff to manage excel modelling. |
|||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||
11. (Monthly reporting) |
n |
n |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Project summary: HBRC secured funding of $1.39 million from central government to upgrade eight bus stops in the region and create two new stops. The funding is part of a Transport Choices package included in the Government’s Climate Emergency Response Fund (CERF) led by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency. |
|||||||||||
11.1 Members of the practitioner group met with Climate Change Commission (CCC) staff in April to give feedback on CCC advice to government on next national emissions reduction plan. 11.2 One practitioner’s group meeting was held to discuss progress on regional plan and deferred chapters. 11.3 Paper was prepared for first Joint Committee for Climate Action meeting (22 May) updating on progress and outlining initial proposed emissions reduction actions. 11.4 On track for presentation to Joint Committee at end of July with reduced scope. Plan is to develop deferred chapters (planning & infrastructure, building & construction, transport, agriculture, and forestry) is required. 11.5 The reduced scope plan is now much more council-led than led by practitioner group so will require more community engagement once complete and we have not been able to achieve genuine mana whenua engagement in the workshops hosted pre-cyclone. |
|||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||
12. Enterprise Asset Management (Monthly reporting) |
n |
n |
l |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Project summary: Aims to embed an Asset Management Information System that integrates into and expands on the Enterprise Resource System (ERP) that was introduced during the Finance Upgrade Systems & Efficiency (FUSE) project. The goal is to improve efficiency, allowing us to confidently identify assets (both spatially and uniquely within a register), manage and maintain our current infrastructure through whole-of-life, and assess risk to determine when changes or additions are required. |
|||||||||||
12.1 Project is behind original timelines due to the cyclone. The project plan is being rephased to respond to priority recovery and rebuild work as staff are returning from response focus. This will bring the project back on track and a focus on driving delivery. 12.2 Asset Register build in sandpit (T1 pre-production) for priority assets (based on recovery strategy). This work is progressing well with a move to production proposed for May. 12.3 An interim Work Package Generator has been designed and deployed to support Cyclone Gabrielle rebuild work. The requirements used to develop this solution will be reused to create and potentially fast track the final TechOne solution. 12.4 Key risks are that two of the wider project team are leaving HBRC, creating some risk to change activity and solution delivery. The impact puts some pressure on key members within the team in the short-term. 12.5 Other risks include the Asset Register data population slowing due to resource working on cyclone response activity. GIS and the Asset Management Register spreadsheet reveal disparity in numbers of assets reported between the two databases. Data synching is required to confirm data integrity with the master (T1 Asset Register). |
|||||||||||
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risk* |
Budget |
Status change over last 6 months |
|||||||
13. Synergy (Monthly reporting) |
n |
n |
n |
|
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Jan |
F/M |
|
Sch |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Risk |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Bud |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
l |
|||||
Project summary: The enhancement of already implemented TechnologyOne modules to ensure a stable foundation for the future stages of the TechnologyOne ERP deployment at HBRC. |
|||||||||||
13.1 Much of our resources were tied up in recovery work during April with some freeing up late April. 13.2 Timelines and budgets are being revised due to resourcing impacts post-cyclone. 13.3 Focus has been on reviewing a more modern OCR tool, review of Nav data tools, completing the payroll requirements. 13.4 Risks remain around project resourcing as a key issue. There is a lack of dedicated project team members, high demand for resource support to complete project tasks, and regional recovery and BAU priorities making availability of Finance and ICT staff to support the project low. |
|||||||||||
Key Strategic Projects – quarterly reporting |
|
Title |
Summary |
Ahuriri Regional Park |
Working alongside Napier City Council and Mana Ahuriri Trust to redevelop the Lagoon Farm site into a Regional Park to address water quality issues in the Ahuriri Estuary, as well as enhance biodiversity, and cultural and recreational benefits for the community. |
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy |
Working in collaboration with coastal communities and local entities for more than eight years to develop the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy 2120. We now need to confirm which council or councils will take charge and lead this work, and we are undertaking consultation, proposing that HBRC should take charge of coastal hazard adaptation between Clifton and Tangoio, as recommended by an independent Funding Review. This would give the Regional Council the mandate to finalise the Strategy. This includes consulting the community on the full implications of implementation, such as the timing and detailed costs of physical works, and who pays for what through the Long-Term Plan 2024-2034 process. |
TANK Plan Change (Policy) |
Proposed TANK Plan Change (PPC9) will add new rules to the Regional Resource Management Plan to manage water quality and quantity for the Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū (TANK) catchments. TANK Plan Change (Implementation): TANK Sub-catchments Community Engagement - An external communications project, intended to inform rural landowners about the Proposed Plan Change 9 (PPC9) framework and to promote catchment group formation. It is a precursor to the overall PPC9 Implementation, the latter contingent on a decision awaited from Hearings Commissioners and any subsequent appeals. |
Title |
Group |
Estimated Start |
Regional Water Efficiency Programme (‘Future Water Use’) |
Asset Management (Water Security) |
TBC |
Biosecurity Information System |
Integrated Catchment Management |
TBC |
Clive River Dredging 2030 |
Asset Management (Regional Assets) |
TBC |
On Demand Public Transport (Napier trial) |
Policy & Regulation (Transport) |
TBC |
Urban Catchment Plans (Te Karamū & Ahuriri) |
Asset Management (Regional Assets) |
TBC |
Decision-making Process
5. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Strategic projects report to 30 April 2023.
Authored by:
Sarah Bell Acting Strategy & Governance Manager |
Jason Doyle Project Manager Policy & Planning |
Approved by:
Desiree Cull Executive Officer to CE |
|
31 May 2023
Subject: Significant organisational activities through June 2023
Reason for Report
1. The following commentary is for Councillors’ information to highlight significant areas of Council activity, particularly in response to Cyclone Gabrielle. Resources are directed toward various initiatives which reflect the Council’s evolving agenda, and it is important that Council is consistently informed of progress in areas that have created or may create a high external profile.
Significant activities by group
Policy and Regulation Group |
||
Project /Activity description |
Significant upcoming milestone(s) |
Team or Section |
Plan Change 9 (TANK plan) appeals |
65. HBRC submitted a memo to the Environment Court on 23 January suggesting grouping of appeal points/topics. Parties initially had until 17 February 2023 to file their comments in response. As a consequence of Cyclone Gabrielle, affected parties were given an extension to 10 March to respond. 66. Three memoranda have been filed by parties in response seeking an alternative topic allocation to that proposed by HBRC. Subsequently an amended topic allocation and order was circulated on 4 April. The Environment Court is yet to confirm if it is satisfied with the amended topic allocation proposal. |
Policy |
Plan Change 7 (Outstanding waterbodies) appeals |
67. Four appeals were lodged with the Environment Court and parties asked the Environment Court to set a hearing date in mid-2023 for those matters where agreements could not be achieved. 68. A revised evidence exchange timetable has been agreed with Hearings now scheduled on or after 20 November 2023. |
Policy |
Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy (FDS) |
69. HBRC, HDC and NCC adopted the Terms of Reference as proposed and agreed to appoint the Napier-Hastings Future Development Strategy Joint Committee and appointed their respective members. 70. First meeting of the new Joint Committee is scheduled for 27 April. Further meetings are currently scheduled for 3 August, 26 October and 12 December 2023. The FDS work programme is currently being re-evaluated in light of disruptions caused by Cyclone Gabrielle. |
Policy |
Ngaruroro River Water Conservation Order (WCO) High Court appeal |
71. High Court appeal hearing had been scheduled to commence on 8 May 2023, but has recently been cancelled pending clarification from one of the parties about their status and interests in proceedings. New High Court hearing date is yet to be confirmed. |
Policy |
Decision Making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the Significant organisational activities through June 2023 staff report.
Authored by:
Mell Anderson Project Manager Hill Country Erosion Scheme |
Mary-Anne Baker Team Leader Policy & Planning |
Vicki Butterworth Cycle Network Coordinator |
Desiree Cull Executive Officer to CE |
Peter Davis Manager Environmental Information |
Dan Fake Freshwater Ecologist |
James Feary Operational Response Manager |
Craig Goodier Principal Engineer |
Simon Harper Team Leader Hydrology & Groundwater Science |
Rob Hogan Manager Compliance |
Gavin Ide Principal Advisor Strategic Planning |
Jon Kingsford Project Manager |
Dr Kathleen Kozyniak Team Leader Marine Air & Land Science |
Anna Madarasz-Smith Manager Science |
Ken Mitchell Asset Management Engineer |
Jolene Townshend Manager Catchment Operations |
Paul Train Catchment Management Lead Southern |
Richard Wakelin Manager Rural Recovery |
Judith Moore Executive Assistant |
Jack Smith-Ballingall Manager, Central & Internal Relationships |
Monique Thomsen Executive Assistant |
Leone Andrews EA to Group Manager – Corporate Services |
Approved by:
Katrina Brunton Group Manager Policy & Regulation |
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
Pieri Munro Te Pou Whakarae |
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
Bill Bayfield Interim Chief Executive |
|
There are no attachments for this report.
31 May 2023
Subject: Appointment of independent HBRIC directors
That Hawke’s Bay Regional Council excludes the public from this section of the meeting, being Agenda Item 15 Appointment of independent HBRIC directors with the general subject of the item to be considered while the public is excluded. The reasons for passing the resolution and the specific grounds under Section 48 (1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are:
General subject of the item to be considered |
Reason for passing this resolution |
Grounds under section 48(1) for the passing of the resolution |
Appointment of independent HBRIC directors |
s7(2)(a) That the public conduct of this agenda item would be likely to result in the disclosure of information where the withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. |
The Council is specified, in the First Schedule to this Act, as a body to which the Act applies. |
Authored by:
Wendie Harvey Independent CAC Member |
|
Approved by:
Susie Young Group Manager Corporate Services |
|