Meeting of the
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee
Date: Friday 23 September 2022
Time: 10.00am
|
Venue:
|
Council
Chamber
Hawke's
Bay Regional Council
159
Dalton Street
NAPIER
|
Agenda
Item Title Page
1. Welcome/Notices/Apologies
2. Conflict
of Interest Declarations
3. Confirmation of Minutes of
the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee held on 15
August 2022
4. Actions
from previous Joint Committee meetings 3
5. Call
for Minor Items not on the Agenda 7
Information
or Performance Monitoring
6. The
future of our coastline consultation update 9
7. Project
manager's update 13
8. Mātauranga
Māori workstream scope 15
9. Interim
management response plan 19
10. Current
coastal projects update 21
11. Communication
and engagement update 25
12. Discussion
of Minor Matters not on the Agenda 27
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
SUBJECT:
Actions from previous Joint Committee meetings
Reason for Report
1. This item tracks
items
raised at previous meetings that require action. A list of outstanding items is
prepared for each meeting, including who is responsible for each, when it is
expected to be completed and a brief status comment.
2. Once the items
have been completed and reported to the Committee they will be removed from the
list.
Decision Making Process
3. Staff have assessed the
requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have
concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making
provisions do not apply.
|
Recommendation
That the Clifton to
Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives and notes the Actions
from previous Joint Committee meetings staff report.
|
Authored by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
|
1⇩
|
Actions from previous Joint
Committee meetings
|
|
|
|
Actions from previous Joint Committee
meetings
|
Attachment
1
|
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Call for Minor Items Not on the Agenda
Reason for report
1. This item provides the
means for Joint Committee members to raise minor matters they wish to bring to
the attention of the meeting.
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional
Council standing order 9.13
states:
2.1. “A meeting may discuss an item that is
not on the agenda only if it is a minor matter relating to the general business
of the meeting and the Chairperson explains at the beginning of the public part
of the meeting that the item will be discussed. However, the meeting may not
make a resolution, decision, or recommendation about the item, except to refer
it to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.”
Recommendations
3. That the Clifton to Tangoio
Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee accepts the following Minor items
not on the agenda for discussion as Item 12:
|
Peter
Martin
Senior
Governance Advisor
|
James
Palmer
Chief
Executive
|
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: The future of our coastline consultation update
Reason
for Report
1. This report provides the Clifton to
Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee with an update on
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) hearing of public submissions
and deliberations on The future of our coastline proposal.
2. Staff provided the Joint Committee
with an update on The future of our coastline feedback process at its
meeting on 15 August 2022, prior to the hearing of verbal submissions and
deliberations on 23 August and 31 August 2022 respectively. That paper outlined
the scope and details of the feedback process, the number of submissions
received – including a breakdown of support of the two options –
and key themes raised in the submissions.
Background
3. Following the adoption of the
Memorandum of Transition (MOT) by the three partner councils in May 2022, HBRC
developed a consultation process to gauge community support for the proposal
that Regional Council leads implementation of the Strategy.
4. The feedback process ran from 1 to 31
July 2022.
5. The purpose was to gauge public
sentiment ahead of the formal process and difficult decisions in the future,
including funding.
6. The scope of the consultation process
was whether HBRC should, in principle, take charge of coastal hazard adaptation
for the coastline between Clifton and Tangoio subject to confirming the
proposal through its Long Term Plan.
7. It did not include the content of the
Strategy, funding to implement it, or how the rates are proposed to be
allocated.
8. HBRC sought feedback on the question
“Who should take charge of adapting to coastal hazards between Clifton
and Tangoio?”.
9. A total of 60 submissions were
received. There was overwhelming support for the proposal.
9.1. The majority of submissions, 52 (87%),
supported Option 1: (the
preferred option) HBRC takes charge of adapting to coastal hazards between
Clifton and Tangoio.
9.2. Six (10%) supported Option 2: (status
quo) Continue with coastal hazards managed in various ways by all three
councils, with no defined lead agency.
9.3. Two submitters (3%) didn’t
support either of the options.
Hearing
of Verbal Submissions
10. Six submitters spoke at the Hearing on
23 August 2022. They were generally supportive of Option 1. A couple of
submitters appreciated the opportunity to provide input on a wide scope.
Speakers impressed upon Council the urgency of the situation, that uncertainty
exists, a desire for innovation, the significant responsibility to protect
people and property, and the need to focus on building awareness and education
to bring people along on the journey.
11. Submitter #43 representing WOW Inc
(Walking on Water) raised concern that the good work of the community panels to
develop the Coastal Hazards Strategy has not translated into action on the
ground.
12. Submitter #61 representing Forest and
Bird emphasised nature-based solutions as the best method, and the opportunity
to integrate Council’s regional planning functions with coastal hazards
work.
13. Submitter #12 representing the North
Shore Road Residents & Ratepayers Committee said caution was needed when
considering predictions made in Tonkin + Taylor’s recent report, as
earlier predictions made in a 2004 report for the North Shore Road erosion zone
had not eventuated.
Deliberations
and Decision of Feedback Process
14.
Staff provided
Council with a deliberations report with information to assist it to make a
decision. That report outlined the key themes raised by submitters in their
feedback and provided staff analysis of those.
15.
Council voted 8 to
1 to agree in principle to take charge of adapting to
coastal hazards
between Clifton and Tangoio, subject to confirmation through its Long Term Plan
2024-2034.
16.
Both the hearing
of submissions and deliberations were recorded as video, should Joint Committee
members wish to view them.
Strategic
Fit
17. This engagement was an
important step in progressing the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards
Strategy 2120.
18. The Strategy’s
implementation is one of the 24 strategic goals in the Council’s Strategic
Plan 2020-2025, contributing to the focus area of sustainable and
climate-resilient services and infrastructure: By 2025 the Coastal
Hazards Joint Committee is implementing its strategy to manage coastal hazards
in Clifton to Tangoio and by 2040 for the rest of the region to adapt to
foreseeable climate change risks to coastal communities out to 2100.
Next Steps
19.
The next steps
include:
19.1
Staff working with
the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee finalise and
notify the strategy document for consultation in late 2023.
19.2
The three partner
councils sign an Asset Transfer Agreement, including a written undertaking from
Napier City Council and Hastings District Council confirming the assets have
been constructed, maintained, and monitored in line with all the resource
consents, long term plans, and asset management plans.
19.3
HBRC includes
final implementation details, including funding arrangements, in the Long Term
Plan 2024-2034.
19.4
Subject to the
above steps being successfully completed, the assets are transferred and HBRC
takes on the new activity from 1 July 2024.
Decision
Making Process
20.
Staff have
assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this
item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the
decision making provisions do not apply.
Recommendation
That
the Clifton to Tangoio
Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives and notes The Future of
our coastline update staff report.
Authored by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
Mandy Sharpe
Project
Manager
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no attachments for this
report.
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Project Manager's update
Reason
for report
1. This report provides an update on project-related
matters including timeframes, budgets and tracking towards milestones.
Project
Dashboard
2. The following project dashboard is
provided to summarise current project status for budget, timeline and all eight
active workstreams (WS). An assessment of each project element is made on a
‘traffic light’ basis, with a brief commentary provided to explain
the rating given.
3. Where a rating has changed from the
preceding report, the metric is shown in red underline with an arrow showing
the change in status.
Project
Dashboard Report: August 2022
|
Metric
|
Status
|
Commentary
|
|
Project
Budget
|
|
|
|
New
Financial Year – no known budget issues
|
|
Project
Timeline
|
|
|
|
Key
project milestones on track
|
|
WS1:
Funding / Governance
|
|
|
|
MOT
signed
|
|
WS2:
LGA Consultation
|
|
|
|
July
consultation process successfully completed
|
|
WS3:
Comms & Engagement
|
|
|
|
COVID
impacts, Mana Whenua engagement low
|
|
WS4:
Design
|
|
|
|
Substantially
complete
|
|
WS5:
Mātauranga Māori
|
|
|
|
Workstream
scope drafted for JC review
|
|
WS6:
Coastal Ecology
|
|
|
|
Mana
whenua engagement required for next steps
|
|
WS7:
Regulatory
|
|
|
|
Target
HBRC + NCC plans – significant work coming
|
|
WS8:
Signals and Triggers
|
|
|
|
Thresholds
completed. Triggers / signals underway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Status:
|
Key
Risk
|
|
Under Stress
|
|
On Track
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Progress under each workstream is
summarised in the Commentary column in the above dashboard. There are no status
changes to report for this period.
5. It is highlighted that the Project
Timeline remains ‘Under Stress’. This is indicative of the remaining
work required to prepare a Strategy for notification in August next year and
the impact of local body elections. This will be a key metric to track and
report on at the next Joint Committee meeting.
Decision
Making Process
6. Staff have assessed the requirements
of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do
not apply.
Recommendation
That
the Clifton to Tangoio
Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives and notes the Project
Manager’s update.
Authored by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no attachments for this
report.
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Mātauranga Māori workstream scope
Reason
for Report
1. This report presents a proposed scope
for the Mātauranga Māori Workstream for Joint Committee endorsement.
Background
2. At the previous Joint Committee
meeting, a paper was presented discussing the ongoing development of the
Mātauranga Māori Workstream and seeking feedback on proposed outputs.
3. In broad terms, the workstream has
been established to allocate additional project resources to facilitate more
effective input from mana whenua and to seek that the Strategy is informed by
Mātauranga Māori.
4. The Joint Committee has previously
directed the establishment of a working group to further develop the
workstream, comprising Joint Committee Members Tania Hopmans, Alana Hiha and Cr
Hinewai Ormsby. Christine Hilton has also joined the hui for the Heretaunga
Tamatea Settlement Trust, pending confirmation of a formal appointment to the
Joint Committee. HBRC’s Māori Partnerships Team has also
supported this work.
5. The working group has confirmed a
draft workstream scope and directed the Project Manager to engage external
expertise to assist with finalising the scope for presentation to the Joint
Committee.
Discussion
6. Provided as Attachment One is
the proposed scope for the Mātauranga Māori Workstream.
7. The scope has been developed with the
working group, and refined with input from Aramanu Rophia, who previously
prepared a Cultural Values Assessment for the Strategy in 2017 and was engaged
as the Kaitiaki o te Roopu for the community assessment panel process though
2017 and 2018.
Next
Steps
8. With any feedback and refinement,
endorsement is sought from the Joint Committee for the proposed Mātauranga
Māori Workstream scope.
9. With that endorsement, TAG will
commence work, and as with other workstreams, report back at each Joint
Committee meeting on progress and outcomes achieved.
10. Discussions are also continuing with
HBRC’s Kotahi team to explore synergies and cross-application
opportunities. The results of these discussions will also be reported up to the
Joint Committee.
Decision
Making Process
11. Staff have assessed the requirements
of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do
not apply.
Recommendation
That
the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives and
notes the Mātauranga Māori Workstream Scope staff report and
endorses the Mātauranga Māori Workstream scope as attached.
Authored by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
|
1⇩
|
Mātauranga Māori
Workstream Scope
|
|
|
|
Mātauranga Māori Workstream
Scope
|
Attachment
1
|
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Interim Management Response plan
Reason
for Report
1. The purpose of this report is to
discuss a proposal for the development of a plan for responding to urgent
coastal hazard issues while the Strategy development process continues.
Background
2. A number of steps and decision points
remain to be resolved in the Strategy development process before the
implementation of physical works to respond to coastal hazards risks can
commence.
3. In the meantime, the Joint Committee
will be aware of ongoing coastal hazard issues being faced by communities along
the coast, including the coastal erosion issues at Whirinaki that were reported
on and discussed at the previous Joint Committee meeting. Issues have also
recently been reported at Bay View, and ongoing issues remain at Westshore, Te
Awanga and other hot spots.
4. Emerging coastal hazard issues are
currently managed on a case-by-case basis by the relevant Territorial
Authority, supported by HBRC (typically in an advisory and/or regulatory
capacity) where necessary. Recent examples include the Clifton and Cape View
Corner revetments.
5. This has long been the established
approach under the Strategy; that existing and new projects would not be slowed
or prevented by the Strategy development process.
6. However, this case by case approach
introduces some uncertainty for communities about what will happen in response
to immediate issues, by when, who to talk to, and what to expect, while the
Strategy development process continues.
Discussion
7. To respond to this issue, the
Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has discussed the concept of an Interim
Management Response Plan.
8. The plan would:
8.1. guide interim actions the Councils
will take to respond to emerging hazard issues ahead of Strategy
implementation
8.2. ensure consistency of actions with the
overall direction of the Strategy
8.3. provide greater clarity for the
community on what actions can be undertaken, and the limitations on actions, in
response to the management of urgent coastal hazard issues.
8.4. seek that the interim management of
ongoing coastal hazard risks is efficient and pragmatic.
9. The development of the plan will
require coordination across all three Councils. It will however be important
that a pragmatic approach is taken to avoid detracting from the overall
Strategy development process.
10. Provisions in the Resource Management
Act continue to provide a way for Councils to undertake works necessary in an
emergency. Section 330 covers instances where public works are required, with
the key determinants being:
10.1. to enable immediate measures to
prevent adverse effects on the environment, or
10.2. remedial measures to manage adverse
effects, or
10.3. respond to a sudden event causing or
with the potential to cause loss of life, injury or serious damage to property.
11. The provisions provide that necessary
works can be undertaken to remove the cause of or to mitigate the adverse
effect of the emergency, without the need to first obtain resource consent.
Section 330B covers works required during a declared state of emergency.
12. Section 330A requires that where
emergency works are undertaken, an application for the necessary resource
consents is lodged within 20 working days of the Council being notified of the
works, or 60 days where the works are required during a declared state of
emergency.
13. The emergency works provisions only
apply to works by authorised people including Councils, network utility
operators and lifeline operators including electricity generators and
distributors, airports, ports, road network providers.
14. Hastings District Council has
previously utilised emergency works provisions to install rock revetment at
Clifton in 2018. While the works in this instance were being discussed and
consents prepared, exacerbation of the erosion from storm activity meant the
need for the revetment became urgent and Council invoked the emergency works
provisions.
15. These provisions continue to allow
Councils to take action in the event that, for example, storm events resulted
in an immediate threat to the road at Whirinaki and preventative or remedial
works were required to respond to the emergency.
Next
Steps
16. TAG seeks input from and discussion
with the Joint Committee on this concept. If there is support for it, TAG
proposes to develop and implement a plan at staff level. A report on progress
and any actions undertaken under that plan would be provided to a future Joint
Committee meeting, noting this will be following the 2022 local body elections.
Decision
Making Process
17. Staff have assessed the requirements
of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do
not apply.
Recommendation
That the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee receives and notes the Interim Management Response Plan staff
report.
Authored by: Approved
by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
Chris Dolley
Group Manager Asset Management
|
Attachment/s
There are no attachments for this
report.
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Current Coastal projects update
Reason
for Report
1. This report provides an opportunity
for the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to update the Joint Committee on various
coastal projects that members have expressed an interest in keeping abreast of.
Whakarire
Avenue Rock Revetment
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
(HBRC) has recently extended this consent for these works and Napier City
Council (NCC) will be undertaking construction in March 2023.
3. Napier City Council (NCC ) is
currently reviewing its obligations under the Memorandum of Transition (MOT) and
will be in touch with HBRC shortly to discuss this project.
Extended
consent area for sand deposition at Westshore
4. HBRC and NCC (Chris and Debra) met and
agreed to co-fund a study to review the Westshore renourishment programme. The
review will look at the rationale to continue doing these activities, at the
impacts to the marine ecology and at future alternatives.
5. The study will examine alternatives to
the programme’s increasing cost and the environmental concerns raised
about the sand nourishment. The study will be an important piece of information
as input to the renewal of the gravel nourishment consent which expires in
2027.
6. The proposed objectives of the study
are:
6.1. undertake a critical review of the
existing technical documentation in the area
6.2. using desktop studies, field
measurements and numerical models, characterise in more detail the coastal
processes and factors responsible for the erosion problem at Westshore,
quantifying the degree of impact each factor produces
6.3. quantify the effectiveness the sand
nourishment programme has in mitigating erosion at Westshore
6.4. quantify the effectiveness the
proposed dredge disposal area extension the would have in mitigating erosion at
Westshore
6.5. assess surfability impacts
6.6. propose optimal sand deposition areas
and placement methodology to achieve the best outcome for erosion mitigation
and minimise negative effects for the ecology
6.7. assess the effects of sand nourishment
in the marine ecology. Would stopping this activity have significant positive
effects on the marine ecology?
6.8. recommend alternatives for concept
design and cost.
Haumoana
18
7. No further updates.
Whirinaki
8. The Technical Advisory Group (TAG) has
discussed a management plan approach across at least the northern cell, using
Whirinaki as an example, to cover interim re-instatement works following larger
storm events.
9. The intervention would be to hold the
line and prevent successive storms eating further away and threatening public
and private assets while the wider strategy moves through its planning
consultation prioritisation and consenting phases, before more permanent and
larger scale responses can be programmed.
10. The approach would look to identify
when urgent action is needed, standardise information requirements for
remediation approaches and sourcing of materials approvals, as well as identify
funding arrangements and ultimately whether a global consent could be obtained
for an interim framework on that basis.
11. This is a similar approach to the
crest maintenance and scraping consent in place for the southern cell. Officers
of the three Councils are working together on such an approach with the TAG
project manager.
12. Native plants have been provided to
the community for community planting to assist in stabilising the reserve
adjacent to the beach.
Coastal
Inundation Assessment Project Update
13. A new coastal inundation study that
will be used by the Napier and Hastings councils to set residential building
floor heights in areas at risk of coastal flooding is expected to be completed
by early next year.
14. Until now, the only information
available to councils has been coastal inundation hazard layers, prepared by
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council in 2015 for emergency preparedness. Given
councils are required to use the most up-to-date information on hazards
available when setting building rules, that report has been relied upon by
Hastings District Council to set building floor heights in the Haumoana and Te
Awanga coastal areas.
15. Commissioned jointly by Hastings
District Council, Napier City Council and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council,
the new study will cover 42 kilometres of coastline, from Clifton to Tangoio,
be prepared using one in 50-year and one in 100-year inundation likelihoods and
cover the next 80 years. Modelling will include wave and storm surge and
predicted sea level rise.
16. Hastings District Council General
Manager of Planning and Regulatory Services John O’Shaughnessy said the
new report would take into account information, reports and Government ministry
guidance updated since the HBRC’s 2015 modelling.
17. The modelling being used by
environmental engineering company Tonkin and Taylor is expected to provide
‘more refined’ information, than that provided by the HBRC hazards
information. That is, at a scale suitable for decisions at a section level.
18. Following the completion of the
report, affected property owners will be contacted via addressed mail.
Hawke’s
Bay Climate Change Engagement
19. HBRC, HDC, and NCC are working
together on an Emissions Reduction Plan for the region and considering how we
can work together in the adaptation space. As part of this work we are
considering methods for communicating with stakeholders.
Decision
Making Process
20. Staff have assessed the requirements
of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do
not apply.
Recommendation
That
the Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives the Current
coastal projects update.
Authored by:
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no attachments for this
report.
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23
September 2022
Subject: Communication and Engagement update
Reason
for Report
1. This report provides a brief overview
of communications and engagement that has happened since the last Joint
Committee meeting in August 2022, and planned engagement activities through to
the end of the year.
Discussion
2. The significant community engagement
effort associated with HBRC’s public consultation in July 2022 (The
Future of Our Coastline) was reported on at the 15 August 2022 Joint Committee
meeting. This included a pamphlet drop to 3,500 households in the Clifton to
Tangoio area.
3. Since then, one community workshop was
held on 7 September 2022 to discuss the outcome of HBRC’s consultation
process, the completed adaptation thresholds, and what to expect from the
Strategy development process over the next 12 months.
4. In the August 2022 Joint Committee
meeting, the committee heard from a community member that there is angst about
ongoing coastal hazard impacts, uncertainty about what the future will look
like, and limited knowledge or understanding of what the Strategy is about -
particularly in the Westshore & Whirinaki communities where ongoing coastal
erosion effects are being experienced. The committee was informed that the
managed retreat report prepared by Tonkin + Taylor compounded these concerns,
despite the reports intended purpose and focus. Erosion issues are also
emerging at Bay View.
5. While it is not clear if these issues
are widespread, it is evident that engagement efforts (e.g. newsletters,
website updates, HB Coast email list, etc) are not effective for at least some
members of the community.
6. The Technical Advisory Group (TAG)
proposes to respond to these issues as follows:
6.1. develop a Strategy information sheet
to go out to all coastal households in the Strategy area (approximately 3500
households) – targeting early November for distribution.
6.2. hold community meetings later in
November – advertised in the information sheet and newspapers etc.
Feedback from the September community workshop suggested that drop-in sessions,
similar to those held previously by the Strategy, are an effective approach.
This would involve two meetings being held, one in Westshore (with a northern
focus) and one in Haumoana (with a southern focus). The format of each session
will enable members of the public to attend during a given time slot to meet
with TAG, Joint Committee members (if available) and community workshop
participants and interact with posters / other information and provide feedback.
7. In addition, TAG is developing an
updated communications and engagement plan for the next 12 months, ahead of
planned Strategy consultation in August 2023. As part of developing this plan,
effective methods of engaging with the community will be part of the feedback
sought through the drop-in sessions.
8. A key challenge, highlighted during
our September community workshop, is assessing how we can more effectively
interact with those that do not live on the coast.
Next Steps
9. With any feedback from the Joint
Committee, TAG will begin preparations for the November engagement activities
discussed above.
10. While no dates have been confirmed at
this stage, it is expected that the first Joint Committee meeting
post-elections will be held in February 2023. TAG will report back on the
outcome of the November engagement to that meeting and will present the
proposed communications and engagement plan to guide engagement through to
Strategy notification.
Decision
Making Process
11. Staff have assessed the requirements
of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do
not apply.
Recommendation
That
the Clifton to Tangoio
Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint Committee receives and notes the Communication
and engagement update.
Authored by:
|
Arlene Crispin
Communications
Advisor
|
Simon Bendall
Coastal
Hazards Strategy Project Manager
|
Approved by:
|
Chris Dolley
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no attachments for this
report.
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Joint
Committee
Friday 23 September
2022
Subject: Discussion of Minor Matters Not on the Agenda
Reason
for Report
1. This document
has been prepared to assist Joint Committee members note the Minor items not on the agenda to
be discussed as determined earlier in agenda Item 5.
|
Item
|
Topic
|
Raised
by
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
