Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council Maori Committee
Date: Wednesday 3 November 2021
Time: 10.00am
Venue: |
Council Chamber Hawke's Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street NAPIER |
Agenda
Item Title Page
1. Welcome/Karakia/Notices/Apologies
2. Conflict of Interest Declarations
3. Alternate Member for 3 November 2021 Meeting 3
4. Confirmation of Minutes of the Māori Committee held on 11 August 2021
5. Take Ripoata ā Takiwā – Taiwhenua Representatives' Updates 5
6. HBRC Chair and Chief Executive's Verbal Updates on Current Issues
7. Follow-ups from Previous Māori Committee Meetings 47
8. Call for Minor Items Not on the Agenda 51
Information or Performance Monitoring
9. Public Use of Rivers 53
10. Possom Control Area - Partial Regional Pest Management Plan Review 57
11. Coastal Bird Survey Results 61
12. LiDAR Partnership Programme Follow-up 65
13. Reports from Regional Council and Committee Meetings 67
14. October 2021 Statutory Advocacy Update 73
15. Significant Organisational Activities Looking Forward through November 2021 79
16. Verbal End of Year Review
17. Discussion of Minor Items not on the Agenda 89
Parking
1. Free 2-hour on-road parking is available on Vautier Street adjacent to the HBRC Building & on Raffles Street.
2. There is free all day parking further afield – on Munroe Street or Hastings Street by Briscoes.
3. There are limited parking spaces (3) for visitors in the HBRC car park – entry off Vautier Street – it would be appropriate that the “visitors” parks be available for the members travelling distances from Wairoa and CHB.
4. If you do pay for parking elsewhere, please provide your receipt to the Receptionist for reimbursement – or include with your expenses claim for the meeting.
NB: Any carparks that have yellow markings are NOT to be parked in please.
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Alternate Member for 3 November 2021 Meeting
Reason for Report
1. The Māori Committee Terms of Reference makes allowance for short term replacements (proxy) to be appointed to the Committee where the usual member/s cannot attend.
That __________________ be appointed as a member of the Māori Committee for the meeting of 3 November 2021 as a short term replacements on the Committee for ____________.
Authored by:
Annelie Roets Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
Pieri Munro Te Pou Whakarae |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Take Ripoata ā Takiwā – Taiwhenua Representatives' Updates
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the opportunity for representatives of the four Taiwhenua (Te Whanganui-a-Orotū, Tamatea, Wairoa/Kahungunu Executive and Heretaunga) to raise current issues of interest in their rohe for discussion as per the reports attached.
Decision Making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “Take Ripoata ā Takiwā – Taiwhenua reports”.
Authored by:
Annelie Roets Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
Pieri Munro Te Pou Whakarae |
|
1⇩ |
Te Taiwhenua o Tamatea report |
|
|
2⇩ |
Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga report |
|
|
3⇩ |
Wairoa Taiwhenua Report and presentation |
|
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Follow-ups from Previous Māori Committee Meetings
Reason for Report
1. Attachment 1 lists items raised at previous meetings that require follow-up, who is responsible, when it is expected to be completed and a brief status comment. Once the items have been reported to the Committee they will be removed from the list.
Decision Making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “Follow-up Items from Previous Meetings” staff report.
Authored by:
Annelie Roets Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
James Palmer Chief Executive |
|
1⇩ |
Follow-ups for November 2021 Maori Committee |
|
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Call for Minor Items Not on the Agenda
Reason for Report
1. This item provides the means for committee members to raise minor matters they wish to bring to the attention of the meeting.
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council standing order 9.13 states:
2.1 “A meeting may discuss an item that is not on the agenda only if it is a minor matter relating to the general business of the meeting and the Chairperson explains at the beginning of the public part of the meeting that the item will be discussed. However, the meeting may not make a resolution, decision, or recommendation about the item, except to refer it to a subsequent meeting for further discussion.”
That the Māori Committee accepts the following “Minor Items Not on the Agenda” for discussion as Item17:
Topic |
Raised by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authored by:
Annelie Roets Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
James Palmer Chief Executive |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Public Use of Rivers
Reason for Report
1. This item updates the Māori Committee on the investigations into the Management of Public Use of River Berms (PUR) and updates on the consultation process with the different iwi groups to engage with the Tāngata Whenua with open communication and build a positive relationship.
Executive Summary
2. In 2016 HBRC undertook a review of how its key river corridors are managed and how our management obligations and their use by the public can be best accommodated. This was in response to increased expectations by the community in regard to the provision of space for recreational activities and the effects associated with those activities. In particular, how Council balances such effects with their other management responsibilities such as flood protection and biodiversity outcomes.
3. The primary goal of this project was to explore various management and maintenance methods for the river corridors and a review of existing and potential public use activities. The report would then provide provision of guidance on the most appropriate management methods and outline a long term plan for management.
4. The PUR project has been put on hold after the adoption of the report in 2019 due to:
4.1. Insufficient detail of the HPFCS LoS project in identifying the improvements required to deliver a resilient scheme to a 1:500 year of projection. This is to ensure that the primacy of the scheme is maintained and informs the PUR work. This will assist in minimizing an inefficient use of capital.
4.2. It has been identified that no comprehensive iwi engagement had been undertaken and a consultation has only taken place with existing recreation groups. Effective iwi consultation was required to inform the PUR project in terms of sites of importance, iwi culture and aspirations.
5. It is noted that some consultations have already commenced as part of the ongoing planting and flood protection work with different iwi groups and other river users (4W drivers club, motocross club, BMX users).
6. As part of this work we are identifying known culturally sensitive sites. The project team has mapped all known sensitive cultural sites and engaged an archaeologist to work with us through the project planning.
7. In summary, we will engage with Tāngata Whenua to understand their values and aspirations for the HPFCS. We like to start engaging and requesting to attend hui at each hapū on the Heretaunga Plains individually. Initially, this means potentially 18 separate hui- however, this may change as we progress further.
8. We propose to start these conversations as value-based engagement instead of focusing on the objective of the project. We also incorporate Hapū Management Plans as the start of the engagement process.
9. The project area is considered for both LoS (IRG) (priority areas) and Public Use of Rivers as a whole of the HPFCS. As previously stated, we intend to focus on building a positive relationship with hapū, understanding their values, and we know that this will take time. We are proposing to have ongoing consultation for beyond the IRG project.
10. The project LoS (IRG) and Public Use of Rivers is restricted to the land owned and managed by the Council as part of the flood control scheme. It does not cover any privately owned land.
11. High-level planning for some of the river access points as part of the Level of Service upgrade work is underway with some consultation with the iwi group already in place.
Background
12. HBRC’s Asset Management Group is responsible for managing the flood protection schemes including access points and public spaces within the scheme areas. There are existing issues of vandalism, antisocial behaviour, rubbish dumping, undesirable vehicle use, freedom camping and illegal or antisocial activities have been ongoing for too long and appear to be escalating. These issues often involve health and safety matters as well as environmental damage, at an increasing cost to ratepayers.
13. In December 2016, a paper and report “Review of Use of Heretaunga Plains Scheme River Berm Land” was presented to the Environment and Services Committee advising of an investigation into Management of Public Use of River Berms within the Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme followed by an update to the 13 September 2017 meeting on investigations to understand and / or respond to:
13.1. Perceived declining regional community tolerance over some aspects of river berm management, such as berm grazing.
13.2. Increasing community level of service expectations as berm land has become both more accessible through higher public use such as cycle trails and more visible due to expressway developments.
13.3. Pressures on scheme land area to accommodate new activities and infrastructure such as horse trails, jet-ski/ boat ramps, carparks and sports grounds whilst not compromising flood protection services and the continued opportunity for existing public use and activity.
13.4. Inappropriate public use and activity such as rubbish dumping, vehicle hooning, freedom camping and illegal activity.
13.5. The need to consider the above in the context of multiple use opportunities such as flood control and drainage objectives, iwi aspirations, biodiversity and ecological enhancements.
14. There are various Māori accounts regarding naming, settlement and use of the awa. This stage of the project is to engage with Iwi to enrich understanding of the cultural values and find ways in which to celebrate and share appropriate cultural histories.
Discussion
15. The next step of this project seeks to achieve the following key outcomes:
15.1. Enhance the understanding of cultural values and history
15.2. Engaged a coordinator to start the process on engaging with mana whenua
15.3. Work with mana whenua to understand their aspirations for this area
16. Focus not only on the priority areas and integrate this project with Level of Services review (IRG) but also incorporate wider scheme areas.
Options Assessment
17. An option to progress with the iwi engagement is a crucial link to Level of Service Upgrade work and ongoing management of the rivers.
18. The option to actively and openly engage and incorporate Iwi into this project will enhance the future relationship of Māori and allow them to integrate their values into the water, land, flora, and fauna within the flood protection.
Significance and Engagement Policy Assessment
19. Under the Council’s Significant and Engagement Policy this project is identify as a significant due to the Heretaunga Plains Flood project Scheme is considered to be a strategic assets.
20. The engagement spectrum and level of engagement under the policy is 3. Collaborate, working together.
Considerations of Tāngata Whenua
21. Considerations from tāngata whenua enables them to have input and integrate their values into the water, land, flora and fauna within the flood protection scheme.
22. Mana whenua will be able to have significant sites mapped out, identified and formally acknowledged.
23. There will be the opportunity to incorporate existing and future Hapū Management Plans into this project.
24. There is an opportunity to work on a creative project to incorporate, educate and celebrate the unique cultural history of these areas.
Next Steps
25. To optimise the use of capital, the Asset Management Group intends to integrate outcomes of the PUR project into HPFCS LoS program. This will coordinate deliverables of both programmes at key prioritised sites, identified as part of the IRG funded projects.
26. Key outcomes are also to:
26.1. Enhance the understanding of cultural values and history
26.2. Work with mana whenua and archaeologists to map and protect significant sites
26.3. Incorporate aspects of existing Hapū Management Plans into this project
26.4 Invite input from Iwi and hapū into priorities managing the HPFCS that reflects the culture and aspirations of Iwi
26.5 Develop opportunities for education to celebrate appropriate cultural history.
27. The next steps are Iwi engagement and public consultation.
28. Focused early consultation for specific sites may be led through HPFCS LoS upgrade projects and later incorporated into the greater PUR project.
Decision Making Process
29. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “Public Use of Rivers” staff report.
Authored by:
Melanie Taiaroa Senior Advisor Māori Partnerships |
Martina Groves Manager Regional Assets |
Approved by:
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Possom Control Area - Partial Regional Pest Management Plan Review
Reason for Report
1. To provide background to a review of Hawkes Bay Regional Councils Possum Control Area (PCA) programme.
2. To update the Committee on the partial plan review process for the Possum Control Area (PCA) programme and to advise membership of the Bio-Working Party (BWP) that will hear the proposed partial plan change.
Executive Summary
3. In August 2020 a S17a review of HBRC biosecurity programmes effectiveness and efficiency was completed.
4. One of the key recommendations of the Section 17a review was that a full review of the Possum Control Area (PCA) programme be undertaken. That review of the PCA programme has been completed, making the primary recommendation that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council should move to a contractor-based model for possum control.
5. The 12 May 2021 Environment and Integrated Catchments Committee (EICC) directed council staff undertake the first step of drafting a proposal that includes a discussion of the costs and benefits of different delivery models for possum management in Hawke’s Bay and the most appropriate funding model. This proposal will be brought back to Council for subsequent consideration and decision making.
6. At the 8 September 2021 EICC it was discussed that in undertaking the public notification and receipt of submissions process, as part of the consultation plan, a hearing panel is required to hear submissions. This panel (the BWP) can also be delegated the authority to make certain decisions under the Act.
Background/Discussion
7. One of the key recommendations of the Section 17a review completed in August 2020 was that a full review of the Possum Control Area (PCA) programme be undertaken. That review of the PCA programme has been completed, making the primary recommendation that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council should move to a contractor-based model for possum control.
8. The PCA Review report also made the secondary recommendation that a funding options analysis should be undertaken to assess the beneficiaries and exacerbators of the programme to determine the most appropriate funding model. These considerations will affect how the financial impact of any new approach to possum control would be spread across the community.
9. The PCA Review report also made several other operational recommendations around pest plant management.
10. If council was to move to a contractor-based model for possum management across approximately 800,000 ha covering both rural and urban areas, an increase in operational budget will be required. Alongside this, the PCA programme will continue to grow as areas roll out of OSPRI vector management and enter the PCA programme.
11. Although a detailed analysis of a contractor-based model has not yet been completed, an estimated cost for landscape maintenance control from Hawke’s Bay possum contractors contacted as part of the PCA review was $7-8/ha. Please note this cost would only apply to the area controlled within the PCA area boundary in any one year.
12. If a substantive change is made to the current delivery model for possum management in Hawke’s Bay, a partial plan review to amend the current Regional Pest Management Plan (RPMP) will be required. The steps to making a RPMP are clearly outlined within sections 70 to 77 of the Biosecurity Act 1993. The first step is for Council to make a proposal in accordance with section 70 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 that demonstrates how numerous provisions have been met.
13. The cost benefit analysis (CBA) is in the process of being updated by Lincoln University from the work undertaken in 2017-18 for the Regional Pest Management Plan. The CBA will indicate whether the net benefit exceeds the cost of implementing a HBRC managed contractor model.
14. In considering options to change the current PCA programme to HBRC managed contracting there are key elements that impact on programme cost, risk and outcomes delivered. These include the:
14.1. Speed of implementation - Depending on the amount of OSPRI TBFree work in the region there will be between 700-800,000 ha of land to transition to HBRC managed contracts. Noting that not all this land area will need to be actively managed all of the time, implementation of large-scale contracting over this area could take place anywhere between 3-5 years with the timeframe determining the rating increases required.
14.2. Contract targets and structure – will be important in determining contract risk for contractors and HBRC, the outcomes that are likely, longer term contractor market capacity and contract / management cost.
14.3. Outcomes council seeks from its investment – different levels of possum control are likely to deliver different outcome results.
15. Other regional councils also have large scale targeted possum control programmes. Staff have met with Environment Waikato, Horizons and Greater Wellington biosecurity teams to better understand their programmes. While there are a number of differences between programmes there are some common themes. These include:
15.1. Challenges around reducing contractor capacity where large-scale contracts are applied in the region
15.2. The importance of resourcing the management of contracting programmes at an appropriate level particularly contract management, auditing and data management
15.3. The importance of having some way to measure the contribution of programmes to biodiversity outcomes.
16. At the 8 September EICC it was discussed that in undertaking the public notification and receipt of submissions process, as part of the consultation plan, a hearing panel is required to hear submissions. This panel (the BWP) can also be delegated the authority to make certain decisions under the Act.
17. The decisions that a hearings panel can be required to make with delegated authority are:
17.1. Considering and recommending advice on the PCA partial plan review process and key issues
17.2. Considering reports on the PCA partial plan review and giving guidance on recommended approach
17.3. Considering reports on the PCA partial plan review proposal and reviewing and giving guidance on the proposal and providing guidance on the alignment of the partial plan review with other plans and strategies
17.4. Reviewing and giving guidance on received submissions.
18. During the 2019 - 2039 RPMP development, the BWP included one independent, out of region member, with both biosecurity and hearings process experience, to sit on the panel as a biosecurity expert. This worked well and staff recommend this take place for the partial plan review as well.
19. At the 10 November EICC it will be proposed that:
19.1. the chair of the BWP panel (determined by panel members) will be delegated powers to have a casting vote in the event that the committee is unable to reach a majority on any matter
19.2. councillors Will Foley, Jerf Van Beek, Craig Foss, Charles Lambert and Jacqueline Taylor are formally adopted as members of the BWP.
20. Two members of the Hearing Panel delegated from the Māori Committee have also agreed to be formally appointed as part of the BWP. Both Roger Maaka and Katarina Kawana have appropriate hearings expertise and bring a tangata whenua perspective
Option Assessment
21. There are three options for the management of the PCA programme that will be explored over the next eight months. These include:
21.1. Large scale targeted HBRC managed possum control contracts
21.2. Increasing the resourcing of the current PCA programme so that it is able to deliver its Levels of Service long term
22. Ceasing the current PCA programme.
Strategic Fit
23. The PCA programme sits within the RPMP. The RPMP plays an important role in achieving both the Biodiversity and Land strategic outcomes and goals in the HBRC Strategic Pan 2020-25.
24. Pest management sits within a biosecurity framework for the Hawke’s Bay region, which includes the RPMP, the Hawke’s Bay Biodiversity Strategy and the HBRC Strategic Plan. Neighbouring Regional Pest Management Plans and national legislation, policy and initiatives have also influenced this Plan.
25. All programmes sitting within an RPMP are required to have clear measurable outcomes, which are specified within the monitoring section. This monitoring section is integrated into the Biosecurity Annual Operational Plan, which goes to council for approval prior to each financial year. The Operational Plan sets out the operational delivery for each programme and the monitoring and reporting requirements. Staff report to council annually (November) on the progress of the Operational Plan.
26. Failing to achieve the RPMP objective and council Level of Service Measures for the PCA programme could affect achieving the strategic outcomes and goals in the HBRC Strategic Pan 2020-25 for Biodiversity and Land.
Financial and Resource Implications
27. Both the large scale contracting and increased resources to the current PCA programme will have potentially significant resource implications that will require annual or Long-Term plan public consultation.
Decision Making Process
28. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.…
Recommendation
1. That the Māori Committee receives the “Possum Control Area - Partial Regional Pest Management Plan Review” staff report.
Authored by:
Campbell Leckie Manager Catchment Services |
|
Approved by:
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Coastal Bird Survey Results
Reason for Report
1. This report provides a summary of the results of a baseline survey of indigenous bird values along the Hawke’s Bay coastline (the survey). An introduction to this survey was brought to the committee in November 2020, and the completed report has been published (HBRC 5560) and is available on our website.
Executive Summary
2. Hawke’s Bay supports a vast array of coastal bird species along our diverse coastline. As part of our responsibilities for the sustainable management of natural resources, and in line with our strategic goal of healthy, functioning and climate-resilient biodiversity, a baseline survey of these bird species using areas of our coast and estuaries was required to provide HBRC with population estimates and detailed distribution maps for Hawke’s Bay’s coastal bird species.
3. A total of 321 km of the Hawke’s Bay coastline (from south of Whangaehu beach to Mahanga) was traversed either by foot or by boat, and the presence and number of all species of birds and marine mammals encountered was recorded for each separate 1 km section of coastline surveyed.
4. A total of 79 bird species and two marine mammal species were detected during this survey. 57 bird species (72%) are native or endemic to New Zealand, and 28 of these species (35%) are ranked as either Nationally Threatened or At Risk under the New Zealand Threat Classification System.
5. Local indigenous species diversity was highest at estuaries, river mouths and coastal lagoons, on inshore islands and along sections of coastline with mixed rocky shore and sandy beach habitats.
6. Maungawhio Lagoon and the eastern coast of Māhia Peninsula, Te Whanganui-a-Orotū/Ahuriri Estuary and the Pōrangahau Estuary are nationally and regionally important habitats for a range of Arctic-breeding and endemic shorebird species, including kuaka/bar-tailed godwit, ruddy turnstone, pohowera/banded dotterel and ngutu pare/wrybill.
7. Based on the findings of the survey, changes to the regional threat rankings of 12 of the 23 bird species are recommended; four species have an improved status, six species have a worsening status, and two species have a neutral status. Nine of these changes are a result from new data collected during this survey.
Strategic Fit
8. The survey contributes to our strategic goal of healthy, functioning and climate-resilient biodiversity (HBRC Strategic Plan 2017-2021).
9. It includes critical information to increase the effectiveness to implement existing and upcoming statutory frameworks including:
9.1. Regional Coastal Environment Plan
9.2. New Zealand Marine Oil Spill Readiness and Response Strategy 2018-2022
9.3. National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity.
10. This work also contributes to Kotahi policy development for determining Significant Conservation Areas.
11. The survey aligns with programmes in Biosecurity, Biodiversity, Predator Free Hawke’s Bay, Coastal/Marine Science, and Policy work streams. The dataset will inform the Ecosystem Prioritisation Programme, Coastal and Marine ecosystem prioritisation (in progress), and Outstanding Water Bodies.
Background
12. The Hawke’s Bay coastline (ca 345 km) is an important breeding and foraging ground for many indigenous birds. Many of these species are at risk of extinction due to habitat loss and degradation, predation, and impacts from other human activities. Climate change is likely to add compounded challenges to these species.
13. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) has statutory responsibilities relating to the sustainable management of the natural values of the Hawke’s Bay coastline, including its indigenous bird values.
14. HBRC commissioned a complete and systematic survey of the indigenous bird values of the Hawke’s Bay coastline in January 2021, to create a regional-scale baseline measure of the diversity, distribution and abundance of indigenous birds inhabiting the Hawke’s Bay coastline.
Discussion
15. The survey:
15.1. Covered 321 km of the region’s approximately 345km coastline by foot or boat
15.1.1. 24 km of the coast was not surveyed (north of Kairakau to Waimarama and the eastern side of Mahia Peninsula) due to lack of landowner approval or inaccessibility
15.2. Recorded 79 bird species and two marine mammal species (NZ fur seals and common dolphins)
15.3. Recorded 32,660 individual birds.
16. 28 of the bird species detected (35%) are ranked as either Nationally Threatened or At Risk under the New Zealand Threat Classification System, including:
16.1. 4 species ranked as Nationally Critical
16.2. 1 species ranked as Nationally Endangered
16.3. 4 species ranked as Nationally Vulnerable
16.4. 8 species ranked as At Risk, Declining
16.5. 2 species ranked as At Risk, Relict
16.6. 4 species ranked as At Risk, Recovering and
16.7. 5 species ranked as At Risk, Naturally Uncommon.
17. 19 of the bird species detected (24%) are ranked as Regionally Threatened under the New Zealand Threat Classification System, including:
17.1. 12 species ranked as Regionally Critical
17.2. 3 species ranked as Regionally Endangered and
17.3. 4 species ranked as Regionally Vulnerable.
18. The survey highlighted the role that larger estuaries and river mouths play as areas of high species richness. Stretches of the mainland coastline that possessed a heterogeneous mix of habitats including a mix of sandy or shingle beaches and intertidal rock platforms also supported a higher diversity of indigenous bird species, including the eastern coastline of Māhia Peninsula, the coastline between Tangoio and the Moeangiangi River, and the coastline between Pōrangahau and Pourerere beaches.
19. Among the 65 estuaries and coastal lagoons surveyed, Te Whanganui-a-Orotū/Ahuriri Estuary supported the highest diversity of indigenous birds with 33 species and 3,356 individuals counted. The Pōrangahau Estuary supported the second highest number of indigenous bird species, with 24 species and 1,311 individuals counted, and the Maungawhio Lagoon supported the third highest number of species, with 22 species and 420 individual birds counted.
20. Key findings of the survey include that:
20.1. Hawke’s Bay supports 16% of the global population of pohowera / banded dotterel
20.2. Tūturiwhatu / New Zealand dotterels have experienced a substantial increase in population size and breeding range along the Hawke’s Bay coastline since 2011 due to a successful species recovery plan
20.3. Hākoakoa / sooty shearwaters were re-discovered to be breeding on Te Motu-o-Kura Island.
Next Steps
21. Changes to the regional threat rankings of 12 of the 23 bird species are being recommended to HBRC; four species have an improved status, six species have a worsening status, and two species have a neutral status. Nine of these changes are a result from new data collected during this survey.
22. Three interactive workshop days are being organised as part of the programme for the community, where people can not only learn about the birds and survey method, but also exchange their knowledge of birds and habitats from their points of view. These workshops will be in early December:
22.1. 2 Dec (Thursday) – Wairoa 5:30-7pm
22.2. 3 Dec (Friday) – Waitangi Regional Park
22.3. 5 Dec (Sunday) – Aramoana.
Decision Making Process
23. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “Coastal Bird Survey Results” staff report.
Authored by:
Becky Shanahan Scientist Marine and Coasts |
Anna Madarasz-Smith Team Leader/Principal Scientist Marine & Coast |
Approved by:
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: LiDAR Partnership Programme Follow-up
Reason for Report
1. This report follows on from the 10 June presentation introducing the LiDAR programme and seeks feedback about if, and how, the Māori Committee wishes to be involved with the programme in future.
Background
2. Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has recently acquired LiDAR mapping for the whole of the Hawke’s Bay region (due to be delivered by the end of the year). This will enable us to have an unprecedented view of the region, allowing us for the first time to strip surface vegetation from imaging and view the shape of the land and infrastructure in extremely high definition.
3. A partnership has been established with Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research (MWLR). An initial scoping exercise was conducted within Council and the following projects were chosen.
3.1. Improving understanding and management of erosion with LiDAR, including:
3.1.1. Upgraded regional erosion and sediment load modelling
3.1.2. Upgraded regional-scale landslide modelling
3.1.3. Improvement to the mapping of the stream network.
3.2. Improving land characterisation with LiDAR, including:
3.2.1. Improvements to soils mapping
3.2.2. Farm scale slope mapping
3.2.3. Identifying Critical Source Areas and assessing flow paths
3.2.4. Estimating surface roughness
3.2.5. Mapping field drains.
3.3. Producing a vegetation layer that could be used for identifying and mapping different types of vegetation (e.g., riparian, wetland, shelterbelt, forest fragments, single trees).
3.4. Improving cultural mapping with LiDAR. This covers the identification of likely Pā-sites, middens, wahi tapu sites. The DEM would be used to support discussions with hapū and likely or potential sites identified.
3.5. Seed funding to determine the potential of LiDAR or building an analytical process to try and derive Ecosystem services information e.g. carbon stocks, recreational value from LiDAR point cloud information etc.
3.6. Extension and testing. This aims to make information from whole LiDAR partnership programme available and accessible for hapū and Māori landowners, farmers, community groups and general public and testing outputs to see if they support land use decision making.
4. A small team from HBRC and Manaaki Whenua will come together regularly to oversee the programme.
5. The project also has an HBRC reference group of Dr Barry Lynch (Team Leader Land Science), Craig Goodier (Team leader Engineering), Andrew Burton (Senior Catchment Advisor) and Tim Farrier (GIS/LiDAR Analyst), and project sponsors: Pieri Munro and Iain Maxwell. All of whom were involved in the scoping of the programme.
6. Melissa Robson-Williams from Manaaki Whenua is working with Dr Barry Lynch of HBRC to ensure that the programme of work is well connected with HBRC through the engagement and testing workstream.
7. As part of the development of these tools we would like to know if and how you would like to be involved with the overall programme or any of the individual projects.
Next Steps
8. We expect the LiDAR to be ready for use by the end of the year, and for work to commence in early 2022.
Decision Making Process
9. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “LiDAR Partnership Programme Follow-up” staff report and presentation and proposes views or ideas on future involvement with the programme.
Authored by:
Dr Barry Lynch Team Leader/Principal Scientist (Land Science) |
Dr Melissa Robson Williams ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST, TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCHER MANAAKI WHENUA – LANDCARE RESEARCH |
Approved by:
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Reports from Regional Council and Committee Meetings
Reason for Report
1. This item provides information from recent meetings attended by Māori Committee representatives, and the opportunity for the Committee to discuss any matters of particular interest arising from those meetings.
Environment and Integrated Catchments Committee (EICC)
2. Dr Roger Maaka represents the Māori Committee on the EICC, which met on 8 September 2021 and considered the following agenda items.
3. The Biosecurity 2020-21 Annual Report and 2021-22 Operational Plan item presented the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s Biosecurity Annual Report for the 2020-21 year and the Operational Plan for the 2021-2022 year for adoption, noting that almost all programme objectives were achieved.
4. The Right Tree Right Place Project Acceleration item sought and was granted Council’s agreement to bring forward up to $500,000 in operating expenditure from year-3 (2023-24) to year-1 (2021 22) for accelerated activity in farmer engagement and the completion of detailed farm plans on a representative number of properties.
5. The Enviroschools 2020-21 Update item highlighted how the school programmes expose learners to Council activities such as work in Open spaces, biodiversity and catchment teams. It was agreed that an invitation will be extended to the Youth Council to attend the November EICC meeting.
6. The Possum Control Area Partial Plan Review Update item covered the preparation of the proposal for a partial plan review for the Possum Control Area (PCA) programme to shift to a contractor based framework.
7. An Introduction to the Catchments Policy Implementation Work Programme covered what activities the team is responsible for including:
7.1. ensuring the necessary resources and processes are in place to effectively implement the rules and policies in Council’s RMA plans
7.2. working collaboratively with National and regional sector working groups on implementation of National regulations
8. The Update on the 3D Aquifer Mapping Project (SKYTEM) item presented progress on the 3D Aquifer mapping project, including an overview of the data collected, the analysis undertaken and some of the preliminary findings.
9. The Update on the Whakaheke o Te Wai (TWOTW): MBIE Funded Endeavour Programme and Heretaunga Plains Groundwater Case Studies item provided an overview on the progress of this programme, including:
9.1. Five different groundwater models at different scales are being developed within the Heretaunga Plains (4 physically based groundwater models and 1 statistical (hybrid) model which supports the National ground water model
9.2. An archive of mātauranga Māori on the Heretaunga Plains is being compiled, focusses on identifying the long-term changes in the groundwater-surface water system – Ngāti Kahungunu and Heretaunga Taiwhenua are collaboratively involved in this project.
10. The Update on IRG Flood Control Resilience Funded Projects item provided an update on the four projects approved for funding as part of the Crown’s Flood Control Resilience Funding with the Infrastructure Reference Group managed by Kānoa (previously Provincial Development Unit), including:
10.1. Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme (HPFCS) Levels of Service
10.2. Upper Tukituki Gravel Extraction Flood Control Scheme
10.3. Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme SH50/Waipawa Erosion
10.4. Wairoa River, River Parade Erosion
10.5. More information can be found as part of the Significant Activities report in this Agenda.
11. The Public Use of Rivers (PUR) item updated the Committee on investigations into the Public Use of River Berms within the Heretaunga Flood Control Scheme, including issues with rubbish dumping and vandalism, freedom camping, illegal or antisocial behaviour which causes significant health and environmental damage.
Regional Transport Committee (RTC)
12. Api Robin represents the Māori Committee on the Regional Transport Committee, which met on 17 September 2021 and considered the following agenda items.
13. The Roadsafe Annual Plan item provided the Committee with an overview of the main activities carried out by Roadsafe Hawke’s Bay over the past year, and the programme for the coming financial year. Highlights included the successful delivery of the HB Youth Roadsafe Expo, regular roadside support provided to police and emergency services featuring road safety messages (including fatigue and speed), the six new driving instructors trained across the region (still looking for instructors in Wairoa) and the adoption of the Roadsafe Work Plan for 2021-22 and agreed to reporting and performance measures.
14. The Roadsafe s17a Review Outcomes item provided the Committee with background on Roadsafe HB activities and sought agreement to undertake a section 17a review of the programme.
15. The Public Transport Update item provided the Committee with an update on bus patronage, highlighting that passenger numbers are well down, a project team has been assembled and the contracting process is underway for the On Demand Public Transport trial, and the review of the Total Mobility scheme.
16. The Transport Manager’s Update covered the appointment of Katie Nimon to the role of Transport Manager, advice that the Ministry for the Environment (MfE) will soon be consulting on NZ’s first Emissions Reduction Plan and issues with the Wairoa to Gisborne rail link not being included in the National Land Transport Plan.
17. The Waka Kotahi (NZTA) Central Region – Regional Relationships Director’s Report provided an update on NZTA projects and activities including the recent approval of the National Land Transport Programme (total budget over 3 years $24.3B including $376M for Hawke’s Bay) and expectation that the SH5 speed limit review will be available to councils and Ministers in November 2021.
18. The Verbal Updates by Advisory Representatives item covered:
18.1. Whakatu Inland Freight Hub project is on hold
18.2. Napier Port is working with the logging industry to address logging truck congestion in and around the Port
18.3. KiwiRail will be expanding its Wairoa - Napier service from a weekend only service to a daily Monday through Friday service.
Regional Council
19. Co-chairs Michelle McIlroy and Mike Paku are invited to attend Regional Council meetings and workshops with full speaking rights (no voting rights). Since the Māori Committee last met on 11 August 2021, there have been three Regional Council meetings and one Extraordinary Regional Council meeting on 13 October 2021. The Co-chairs will provide verbal updates on discussions from those hui.
Decision Making Process
20. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “Reports from Regional Council and Committee Meetings”.
Authored by:
Annelie Roets Governance Advisor |
|
Approved by:
Leeanne Hooper Team Leader Governance |
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: October 2021 Statutory Advocacy Update
Reason for Report
1. This item reports on proposals forwarded to the Regional Council and assessed by staff acting under delegated authority as part of the Council’s Statutory Advocacy project.
2. The Statutory Advocacy project (Project 196) centres on local resource management-related proposals upon which the Regional Council has an opportunity to make comments or to lodge a submission. These include, but are not limited to:
2.1. resource consent applications publicly notified by a territorial authority
2.2. district plan reviews or district plan changes released by a territorial authority
2.3. private plan change requests publicly notified by a territorial authority
2.4. notices of requirements for designations in district plans
2.5. non-statutory strategies, structure plans, registrations, etc prepared by territorial authorities, government ministries or other agencies involved in resource management.
3. In all cases, the Regional Council is not the decision-maker, applicant nor proponent. In the Statutory Advocacy project, the Regional Council is purely an agency with an opportunity to make comments or lodge submissions on others’ proposals. The Council’s position in relation to such proposals is informed by the Council’s own Plans, Policies and Strategies, plus its land ownership or asset management interests.
4. The summary outlines those proposals that the Council’s Statutory Advocacy project is currently actively engaged in.
Decision Making Process
5. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Māori Committee receives and notes the “October 2021 Statutory Advocacy” report.
Authored by:
Ellen Robotham Policy Planner |
Nichola Nicholson Policy Planner |
Approved by:
Ceri Edmonds Manager Policy and Planning |
|
1⇩ |
October 2021 Statutory Advocacy Update |
|
|
Māori Committee
Wednesday 03 November 2021
Subject: Significant Organisational Activities Looking Forward through November 2021
Reason for Report
1. The commentary following is for Councillors’ information, to highlight significant areas of Council activity. Significant Council resources are being directed toward various initiatives, which reflect the Council’s evolving agenda and it is considered important that Council is consistently informed on progress in areas that have or may create a high external profile.
Project / Activity Description |
Significant Upcoming Milestone(s) |
Group /Team or Section |
River Parade Erosion Protection |
1 Works are due to commence on site at the end of October following coordination with WDC to relocate lighting columns |
Regional Projects |
Biodiversity and biosecurity |
3. Predator Free Mahia continues the hunt down phase for possums on the peninsula 4. Pest plant time - actively into the busy part of the year with Darwins Barberry and Chilean Needlegrass the main focus 5. Jobs for Nature and other EPA sites projects continue to be delivered 6. Aerial rook control season is underway |
ICM – Catchment Services |
Central Catchments |
||
Project / Activity Description |
Significant Upcoming Milestone(s) |
Group /Team or Section |
TANK Plan Change (PC9) |
7. An additional hearing day was held on the 27 September. The hearing panel are currently in deliberations and preparing the draft decion. 8. No date has been confirmed for the decision release. |
Policy & Planning Policy & Regulation |
Omaranui Landfill expansion resource consent applications |
9. Consent application Hearing is scheduled 1 November 2021. |
Regulation Consents |
Flood Control Schemes |
10. Taradale stopbank strengthening physical works planned to commence on site end of October. 11. Moteo and East Clive stopbank ground investigation works targetted for completion by November 2021. Roys Hill and Ngatarawa investigations completed and analysis is ongoing. |
Asset Management Engineering Regional Projects |
Heretaunga Plains Scheme review |
12. The Lower Tukituki River hydrodynamic model is nearing completion. This new information is being fed into the work reprioritising stopbank upgrades. 13. Further modelling of lower reaches and river mouth being done to understand the effects of different conditions. |
Asset Management Regional Projects |
Gravel Management |
14. Asset Management team unfortunately coud not gain agreement to build new access road for extraction of gravel in upper reaches at XS 55 and XS56 on the Ngaruroro. We will be looking into alternatives for long term access. 15. Global Consent site visit has been rescheduled for 9 November and Hearing is to be scheduled in December. Gravel allocations determined under the existing system for 2021-22 in the meantime. |
Asset Management Consents, Schemes |
Waitangi Regional Park |
16. CCTV cameras are installed to provide surveillance of activities in this popular open space. 17. A Memorandum of Understanding for collaboration with Atea a Rangi Educational Trust and four hapu is underway to agree on future development of the park while identifying opportunities to work together to celebrate significant sites. |
Open Spaces |
18. Logging is due to resume at Tūtira Regional Park in another month. Log prices have fallen, shipping costs have increased, and negotiations are underway with the harvest manager to determine if logging will proceed as planned. |
Asset Management Open Spaces, Forestry |
|
Hawea Historical Park / Karamu Stream Diversion |
19. Draft Hawea Park Management plan is under review with management complete, awaiting cultural information from the Hawea Historical Park Management Committee. The Plan is to be completed by December 2021. 20. Stage 3 project delivery includes pathways around the park, construction work for widening of the confluence, and design of the bridge due to commence in November 2021. |
Asset Management Open Spaces, Regional Assets |
Bayview/ Whirinaki Cycleway |
21. Project on hold pending NCC confirmation of project risks, budget, property acquisition risks, and the possibility of compulsory acquisition. Meeting with NCC to discuss way forwarded scheduled for 20th of October. |
Asset Management Regional Projects |
Southern Catchments |
||
Project /Activity Description |
Significant Upcoming Milestone(s) |
Group /Team or Section |
Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme |
22. Earthworks completed on Waipawa river erosion above SH50 and handover to asset owner is underway. 23. Registration of Interest (ROI) for gravel extraction has been put out to market. Invites to Request for Tender to follow once responses from ROI have been received |
Asset Management Regional Projects, Schemes |
|
Project/Programme Title |
Schedule |
Risks* |
Budget |
Comment |
Status Change |
1 |
Right Tree Right Place Pilot |
|
|
|
Partnership agreement with The Nature Conservancy has been confirmed, and their project manager has now been appointed. The media announcement about our partnership has been well received with a number of follow-up articles requested. The detailed project plan will be developed over the next six weeks. The shortage of seedlings continues to pose a risk, due to limited availability. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
2 |
Regional Water Security Programme: Project 1: Heretaunga Water Storage |
|
|
|
Upper-Catchment geotech investigations completed and draft report due end of October (approx 4-5 weeks lost due to Covid). Multiple engagements with Mangaroa Marae representatives on lowland streamflow maintenance. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
Project 2: Managed Aquifer Recharge |
|
|
|
Technical workstreams steady. Mana whenua engagement for Cultural Impact Assessment scheduled for 25 November. Landowner engagement and irrigation/landuse trial options positive. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
|
3 |
Ahuriri Regional Park |
|
|
|
New dedicated project manager to be appointed by NCC. Project scope needs to be fully defined with NCC. Focus for the next year is to clarify vision, scope, and reconnect with Mana Ahuriri. Three Waters Reform may impact. |
No change |
4 |
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Implementation |
|
|
|
An in principle decision for HBRC to take a leadership role in the implementation of the strategy had been made subject to conditions. The budget of 300k is insufficient for a full LTP amendment as long with other workstreams. |
No change |
5 |
On-demand Public Transport |
|
|
|
COVID and other factors are adding further delays to the securing of buses which is stretching out the trial launch by at least another 4 months. Additional budget items have been identified and costed and being worked through the HBRC budget process. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
6 |
Kotahi Plan |
|
|
|
Project Manager to be appointed. Te Mana o Te Wai – values and long-term visions with tangata whenua due to start this year.
|
No change |
Kotahi: Mohaka Plan Change |
|
|
|
Workshop with HBRC and NPDT project team delayed due to COVID, but still within schedule.
|
No change |
|
7 |
Tukituki Plan Policy Implementation |
|
|
|
Two tier N loss risk matrix developed with primary industry sector which will be used to triage the Tuki consent applications. Engagement with community recommenced after a hiatus due to Overseer uncertainty. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
Farm Environmental Management Plans (FEMPs) |
|
|
|
First cycle of FEMP resubmissions were due on 31st May 2021, currently awaiting outstanding submissions which are delayed due to capacity of and number of approved farm plan providers |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
|
8 |
Financial Upgrade Systems and Efficiencies (FUSE) |
|
|
|
The FUSE project is under review, as it is transitioning to BAU in order to better manage the integration of Opal3 and Techone, and provide support around the challenges around aligning financial data and internal process. |
Updated since 29 Sep 21 SAR |
9 |
Te Karamu Catchment Plan |
|
|
N/A |
New FTE to be hired to manage this plan. There will be no specific budget allocated, as this role will be considered operational. Currently behind schedule to fill this position and commence development of plan. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
10 |
Ahuriri Catchment Plan |
|
|
N/A |
New FTE to be hired to manage this plan. There will be no specific budget allocated, as this role will be considered operational. Currently behind schedule to fill this position and commence development of plan. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
11 |
TANK Plan Change |
|
|
|
Budget currently sitting at $4.5m spent to date. Unclear yet whether further caucusing is required following the Hearing held 27 September with Ngāti Kahungunu Iwi Inc (NKII) and Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga (TToH). |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
Tank Plan Implementation |
|
|
|
Comms plan and pilot materials to be developed and tested. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
|
12 |
Erosion Control Scheme (ECS) Programme (incl. Soil Conservation Nursery & HCEF) |
|
|
|
Capacity and capability, due to shortage in labour market and rising material costs around farm planning. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
13 |
Water Efficiency Programme Review (Future Water Use) |
|
|
|
Funding becomes available in Year 2 of LTP. Initial internal scoping undertaken and a brief of work for policy development options to direct funding has been approved. Policy document to be reviewed internally before being presented to Council. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
14 |
Ecosystem Prioritisation: Terrestrial |
|
|
|
Jobs for Nature (J4N) funding has increased number of sites that will be protected over the next three years |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
Ecosystem Prioritisation: Coastal & Marine |
|
|
|
No allocated budget or resources for implementation of science report findings. To be reviewed next Long Term Plan cycle. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
|
15 |
Partial Possum Control Plan Review |
|
|
|
Cost Benefits Analysis is underway, and detailed project plan is being developed. If Council decide to approve the proposal in Jan 2022, a risk assessment for contractor capacity and maintaining a fit-for-purpose contractor market will be required. |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
16 |
Flood Control & Drainage Scheme – IRG: Heretaunga Flood Control & Drainage Scheme & Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme) |
|
|
|
Risks being managed are resource availability (consultants and contractors), COVID-19 programme delays, archaeological findings may cause delay |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
Flood Control & Drainage Scheme – IRG: Upper Tukituki Flood Control Scheme |
|
|
|
Risks being managed are market engagement, achieving targeted extraction volumes within allocated budget, COVID-19 programme delays |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
|
Flood Control & Drainage Scheme – IRG: Wairoa River, River Parade Erosion |
|
|
|
Risks being managed are COVID-19 programme delays, procurement of materials, unforeseen ground conditions, cultural impact assessment |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
|
17 |
Revenue & Financing Policy/ Rates Review (incl. Scheme Rating Reviews) |
|
|
|
This project has not started, and will commence upon the appointment of new CFO |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
18 |
Enterprise Asset Management |
|
|
|
This project is due to commence in Feb 2022 |
Added for 27 Oct 21 SAR |
Project Summaries
1 |
Right Tree Right Place Pilot on up to five farms to understand the detail set-up costs, partnership, and delivery options. Under the trial, we would offer a loan to landowners to plant trees on their erodible land. Opportunities being explored with The Nature Conservancy. |
2 |
Regional Water Security Programme PGF funding has allowed us to investigate water supply options through two projects: Heretaunga Water Storage and Managed Aquifer Recharge in Central Hawke’s Bay. A 50-year Regional Water Assessment will inform the work, including regional water supply and demand into a future challenged by climate change. |
3 |
Ahuriri Regional Park Working alongside NCCC to redevelop the Lagoon Farm site into a Regional Park will allow for stormwater detention and wetland treatment for improved environmental outcomes, as well as providing cultural, educational, and recreational opportunities. |
4 |
Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazards Strategy Implementation Working with HDC & NCC to implement the long-term (100 year) adaptive strategy for responding to coastal erosion and coastal inundation in priority areas of the coast between Clifton and Tangoio. |
5 |
On-Demand Public Transport A new form of public transport that replaces fixed routes with an on-demand service. This will be a trial in Hastings which uses innovation and technology to lower the region’s transport emissions, provide better transport choices for the community and will give more equitable access to public transport. |
6 |
Kotahi Is a combined resource management plan for the Hawkes Bay region. The Regional Policy Statement and Regional Plan combined, and the Regional Coastal Environment Plan are due for review. In addition, the NPSFM 2020 requires us to develop a plan to give effect to Te Mana o Te Wai. |
7 |
Tukituki Plan Policy Implementation Implementation of statutory deliverables related to the Tukituki Plan, with particular focus on changes arising from the Government’s response to the Science Advisory Panel’s review of Overseer. Farm Environmental Management Plans (FEMPs) FEMPs aim to address environmental outcomes and actions to improve environmental performance on properties over 4ha within the Tukituki region at this stage 3 yearly submission cycle – first resubmission was due 31 May 2021 |
8 |
Financial Upgrade Systems and Efficiencies (FUSE) The implementation of the new financial system TechOne. FUSE will standardise processes, and improve transparency and accessibility of financial data, and financial process efficiencies. |
9 |
Te Karamu Catchment Plan The new plan will collate intelligence on all parties and their activities in the Karamu Catchment. This will be utilised to provide visibility on activities within the catchment and identify options to influence for improved water quality and biodiversity outcomes. |
10 |
Ahuriri Catchment Plan The new plan will collate intelligence on all parties and their activities in the Ahuriri Catchment. This will be utilised to provide visibility on activities within the catchment and identify options to influence for improved water quality and biodiversity outcomes. |
11 |
TANK Plan Change (Policy) Proposed TANK Plan Change (PPC9) will add new rules to the Regional Resource Management Plan to manage water quality and quantity for the Tūtaekurī, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamū (TANK) catchments. TANK Plan Change (Implementation): TANK Subcatchments Community Engagement An external comms project, intended to inform rural landowners about the PC9 framework and to promote catchment group formation. It is a precursor to the overall PC9 Implementation, the latter contingent on a decision awaited from Hearings Commissioners and any subsequent appeals. |
12 |
The Erosion Control Scheme (ECS) Provides access to a grant for Hawke's Bay landholders to implement soil conservation measures on highly erodible land, keeping soil on the hills and out of waterways. It provides significant financial support for erosion control work such as non-commercial tree planting, protection fencing, land retirement and assisted reversion. Hill Country Erosion Fund (HCEF) Is Central Government funding to support ECS activities and events that are targeted at educating and supporting staff and landowners with the reduction of hill country erosion. Soil Conservation Nursery The primary purpose of the nursery is to grow poplar and willow poles for erosion control and are managed primarily for the ECS and Works Group, river control plantings. |
13 |
Future Water Use ‘Future Water Use’ – making better use or the water we have to complement water storage. Work with water users to drive more efficient and effective use to complement water storage. |
14 |
Ecosystem Prioritisation: Terrestrial This programme focuses on protecting and enhancing 700 Ecosystem Prioritisation sites across the region. To achieve this, we have partnered with internal and external stakeholders alongside land occupiers. The main actions are deer fencing, pest plant and animal control and some enhancement planting. Ecosystem Prioritisation: Coastal and Marine The Coastal and Marine team have undertaken scientific investigations to identify biodiversity prioritisation sites off the coast of Mahia and Clive, using Zonation software to inform spatial management. The outcomes and recommendations have been concluded and can now move forward to implementation phase. |
15 |
Partial Possum Control Plan Review Investigating changing the current Possum Control Area Programme from an occupier responsibility model to a large-scale contract model. A contracting model will secure the continued success long term of the outcomes delivered by low possum numbers and increase the biodiversity benefits from consistently low possum numbers. |
Enforcement Actions |
||
24. There are 11 active prosecutions before the court, at various stages therefore not able to comment publicly on. |
||
Date |
Type of Enforcement Action |
Status |
Feb 21 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Jan 21 |
Discharge to air - odour |
Before the court |
Nov 20 |
Burning prohibited items |
Before the court |
Nov 20 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Oct 20 |
Burning prohibited items |
Before the court |
Jul 20 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Jun 20 |
Burning prohibited items |
Before the court |
Jun 20 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Jun 20 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Mar 20 |
Discharge to land that may enter water |
Before the court |
Jun 19 |
Burning prohibited items |
Before the court |
Environment Court Processes |
||
Date |
Type of Enforcement Action |
Status |
Oct 20 |
Outstanding Water Bodies Plan Change appeals |
Mediation date confirmed for 27 October |
|
Draft Water Conservation Order application for Ngaruroro River appeals |
Before the court |
Decision Making Process
2. Staff have assessed the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only, the decision-making provisions do not apply.
That the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council receives and notes the “Significant Organisational Activities Looking Forward through November 2021” staff report.
Authored by:
Michael Bassett-Foss RTRP Project Manager |
Allan Beer Team Leader Biosecurity - Animal Pests |
Sarah Bell Team Leader Strategy & Performance |
Jack Blunden Team Leader Compliance - Urban & Industrial |
Vicki Butterworth Cycle Network Coordinator |
Desiree Cull Strategy & Governance Manager |
Peter Davis Manager Environmental Information |
Tania Diack Team Leader Consents |
Ben Douglas Forest Management Advisor |
Ceri Edmonds Manager Policy and Planning |
Russell Engelke Team Leader Open Spaces |
Dean Evans Manager Catchments Delivery |
Craig Goodier Principal Engineer |
Martina Groves Manager Regional Assets |
Sandy Haidekker Senior Scientist |
Nathan Heath Area Manager Northern Hawke's Bay |
Dr Andy Hicks Team Leader/Principal Scientist Water Quality and Ecology |
Rob Hogan Manager Compliance |
Gavin Ide Principal Advisor Strategic Planning |
David Keracher Manager Regional Projects |
Dr Kathleen Kozyniak Principal Scientist (Air) |
Campbell Leckie Manager Catchment Services |
Anna Madarasz-Smith Team Leader/Principal Scientist Marine & Coast |
Julie-Anne McPhee Senior Project Manager |
Malcolm Miller Manager Consents |
Mark Mitchell Team Leader Principal Advisor Biosecurity Biodiversity |
Te Wairama Munro Maori Engagement Coordinator |
Tim Norris Land Scientist |
Thomas Petrie Programme Manager Protection & Enhancement Projects |
Brendan Powell Manager Catchments Policy Implementation |
Wendy Rakete-Stones Acting Team Leader Plant Pests |
Dr Jeff Smith Manager Science |
Jolene Townshend Senior Advisor Integrated Catchment Management |
Belinda Harper Senior Planner |
Approved by:
Katrina Brunton Group Manager Policy & Regulation |
Chris Dolley Group Manager Asset Management |
Iain Maxwell Group Manager Integrated Catchment Management |
|