Meeting of the Regional Transport Committee
Date: Wednesday 20 April 2011
Time: 10.15am
|
Venue:
|
Council Chamber
Hawke's Bay Regional Council
159 Dalton Street
NAPIER
|
Agenda
Item Subject Page
1. Welcome/Notices/Apologies
2. Conflict of Interest Declarations
3. Short Term Replacements for the Regional Transport
Committee
4. Confirmation of Minutes of
the Regional Transport Committee held on 18 February 2011
5. Matters Arising from Minutes of the Regional Transport
Committee held on 18 February 2011
6. Consideration of General Business Items
7. Action Items from Previous Regional Transport Committee
Meetings
Decision Items
8. Draft Regional Land Transport Strategy Discussion Document
Consultation Summary
Information or Performance Monitoring
9. Public Transport Update
10. Regional Public Transport Plan - Initial Consultation
Summary
11. NZTA Regional Director's Report
12. Progress Report on Regional / Joint Projects
13. General Business
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Short Term Replacements for the
Regional Transport Committee
INTRODUCTION
1. Council has made allowance in the terms of reference of the
Committee for short term replacements to be appointed to the Committee where
the usual member/s cannot stand.
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That _____________________
be appointed as member/s of the Regional Transport
Committee of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council for the meeting of Wednesday,
20 April 2011 as short term replacements(s) on the Committee for _______________________.
|
|
Carol Gilbertson
transport
Manager
|
|
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Action Items from Previous Regional
Transport Committee Meetings
INTRODUCTION
1. Attachment 1 is a list of items raised at previous Regional
Transport Committee meetings that require action or follow-up. All action items
indicate who is responsible for each action, when it is expected to be
completed and a brief status comment. Once the items have been completed and reported
to the Committee they will be removed from the list.
DECISION
MAKING PROCESS
2. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with
Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have
assessed the requirements contained within this section of the Act in relation
to this item and have concluded that as this report is for information only and
no decision is required in terms of the Local Government Act’s provisions, the
decision making procedures set out in the Act do not apply.
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the Regional Transport Committee receives
the report “Action Items from Previous Regional Transport Committee
Meetings”.
|
|
Esther-Amy Bate
Planner
|
Carol Gilbertson
transport
Manager
|
Attachment/s
|
1View
|
Actions List
|
|
|
|
2View
|
Final State
Highway Classification Submission
|
|
|
|
Actions List
|
Attachment 1
|
Actions from Regional Transport Committee Meetings
The following is a list of items
raised at the Regional Transport Committee meetings that require actions or
follow-ups. All action items indicate who is responsible for each action, when
it is expected to be completed and a brief status comment for each action. Once
the items have been completed and reported back to the Committee they will be
removed from the list.
|
Agenda
Item
|
Action
|
Person
Responsible
|
Due
Date
|
Status
Comment
|
|
State Highway 38 – Request for
Sealing
|
To be left on the list for
regular follow-ups
|
|
ongoing
|
|
|
State Highway Classifications
|
Submission to be prepared by TAG and ratified by full Committee via email
|
HC/EAB
|
27 March 2011
|
Final submission
sent to NZTA on 30 March 2011. Copy attached for the Committee’s information.
|
|
NZTA Director’s report
|
Update on Mohaka bridge and
Waitangi Bridge
|
NZTA
|
31 March 2011
|
NZTA carrying
out investigation work on the Waitangi Bridge; remedial work has recently
been undertaken on Mohaka Bridge
|
Our Ref: TRA1
30 March 2011
Mr Matt Grant
State Highway
Classification
NZ Transport
Agency
Private Bag 6995
44 Victoria
Street
WELLINGTON
6141
Dear Mr Grant
SUBMISSION ON STATE HIGHWAY
CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
1. The
following submission has been prepared by the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council on
behalf of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Transport Committee (the Committee) in
response to the Draft State Highway Classification System.
2. The
Committee has considered the proposal outlined in the consultation document and
supports the proposed classification system overall with the following
comments:
2.1 The
Committee agrees that it is appropriate that the draft classification has
ranked State Highway 2 as a National Strategic High Volume (Port of Napier to
south of Hastings), National Strategic (Hastings to Levin) and Regional
Strategic (Napier to Gisborne), this is a vital intra-regional and
inter-regional route linking the Port of Napier with its expanding Central North
Island freight catchment.
2.2 The
Committee is of the view that State Highway 5 (Port of Napier to Taupo) is also
nationally significant for freight and tourism reasons rather than the
regionally significant status accorded in the draft classification.
2.3 The
NZTA has used a 'fit for purpose' methodology to develop the proposed
classification system. The success factors include; giving effect to the
Government's strategic direction for land transport; providing a clear and
integrated framework for better planning, investment and operational decision
making; and applying a methodology that is robust over the short term as well
as the longer term. Furthermore, the NZTA has identified six criteria to
classify state highways that align with the functions that the government is
seeking from the network and for which there is robust data available. The
Committee considers this approach to be logical and with sensible outcomes. It
looks forward to further discussions regarding Levels of Service, later in the
process.
2.4 The
Committee considers the proposed classification system to be robust and
efficient as it takes into account urban centres rather than administrative
boundaries. Furthermore the Committee believes that NZTA has been realistic to
consider the combined populations of Napier and Hastings as a major urban
centre in the fourth ranking of urban centres in New Zealand. This recognises
the reality that Napier/Hastings has an integrated geographical and economic
relationship resulting in an inter-connected complex freight distribution
network that is nationally strategic. We suggest in your national route maps
that Napier/Hastings be identified with the title in bold, and be consistent
with the treatment of the other six main centres.
2.5 The
Committee feels it is worth noting that the 2009 Port of Napier statistics used
in the Port tonnage and value factoring have been significantly exceeded in the
2010 year, i.e. 2.817M tonnes up 18% to 3.416M tonnes. In the current financial
period the 12 month moving annual tonnage figure currently stands at 3.610M
tonnes or +5.7% on the 2010 year, this number should be very close to what is
eventually reported for the Port’s 2011 result. This further validates the
proposed draft classification. It is also important to note that upgrading and
sealing of the Napier/Taihape Road is due for completion in the current
financial year. As a strategic inter-regional route, this will further increase
heavy traffic freight volumes to the Port of Napier.
3. While
the other Hawke’s Bay Territorial Local Authorities may make their own
submission, this submission is provided by the Hawke’s Bay Regional Transport
Committee and is supported in principle by its constituent Local Authorities;
these being Napier City Council, Hastings District Council, Central Hawke’s Bay
District Council and Wairoa District Council.
4. If
you have any queries regarding this submission, please contact Carol
Gilbertson, Transport Manager on (06) 835 9216.
Yours sincerely
Alan Dick QSO
Chairman
Hawke’s Bay Regional Transport
Committee
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Draft Regional Land Transport
Strategy Discussion Document Consultation Summary
REASON FOR REPORT
1. The purpose
of this paper is to:
1.1. Provide
the Committee a summary of the comments received from the general public as
part of the pre-consultation process for the Draft Regional Land Transport
Strategy 2012 (RLTS 2012).
1.2. Request the Committee endorse the revised Vision Statement
and Objectives to be included into the Draft Regional
Land Transport Strategy 2012 (RLTS 2012).
Background
2. On 18 February 2011,
the Committee adopted the Regional Land Transport Strategy – Discussion
Document for the purpose of pre-consultation on the Draft Regional Land
Transport Strategy 2012. The Discussion Document was the outcome of a review
of the current vision, issues and options, and objectives in the Regional Land
Transport Strategy 2008 (RLTS 2008). A selection of future scenarios were
compiled based on the transport objectives listed in the Land Transport
Management Amendment Act (LTMAA) and the vision and objectives in the
Discussion Document.
3. The Discussion Document
was distributed to approximately 54,000 households as part of the Regional
Council’s publication “The Big Picture”. The period for receiving comments was
open for four weeks concluding on 25 March 2011. During this time 21 responses
to the Discussion Document were received. The pre-consultation process is non-statutory.
The comments where relevant, will be used as background information to inform
and support the Committees strategic direction during the development of the
Draft Regional Land Transport Strategy. Shown at Attachment 1 is a summary of
the comments received and responses to some of the key comments by members of
the Technical Advisory Group (TAG).
Community Feedback
4. In general the comments
provided by the community were positive and supported the Committee’s overall
strategic direction. A number of recurring specific themes were voiced through
the comments, in general:
4.1. Concern regarding the
movement of trucks on Marine Parade in Napier and through other sensitive
zones;
4.2. Improving
inter-regional tourism links and accessibility to Lake Waikaremoana and to the
Bay of Plenty via State Highway 38;
4.3. Rail use for
passenger services and freight movement within the region and also as important
inter-regional links between Gisborne to Wellington;
4.4. Strongly encouraging
multi-model transport and alternative transportation such as cycling and
walking; and
4.5. Interest in the
scheduling and routing of passenger transport services
Road Transport
5. The Hawke’s Bay economy
is underpinned in the main by its primary industries. The movement of freight
around the region, and to and from other regions is considered to be of major
significance for future economic development. Due to the geographic spread of
these industries a resilient and robust roading network is required to support
the movement of people, goods and services.
6. It is considered that
commercial and personal vehicular transport will continue to be the dominant
mode of transport due to the distribution of population and industry in the
region. However, it was agreed by many that the effects of rising cost of fuel
and carbon dioxide emissions must be taken into account in long term planning,
especially if there are changes in primary production and industry due to
climate change.
7. Submitters supported
the Discussion Document’s focus on economic development, especially in its
alignment to the Government Policy Statement. However there was concern raised
that there must not be an imbalance against the community and those who have a
vested economic interest in heavy road transport.
8. Rather than increasing
movement of goods and people, some submitters considered that the transport
network should be streamlined so that distances travelled can be reduced and
efficiency increased. Local Authorities and the Regional Council should plan
for efficient transport routes that reduce the distances that people need to
travel to essential services to reduce private motorcar use. In this way
transport could contribute to the sustainable use of resources and economic
resilience of the region as an efficient and integrated land transport system
that will aid the regional economy.
9. A number of submissions
support the establishment of an inland port as a freight depot/hub. It was
considered that the depot would integrate road and rail modes, and result in
fewer trucks on the roads as more freight was moved between regions, around
Hawke’s Bay and to the Port of Napier via rail.
10. The completion of the
Matahorua Gorge overbridge on State Highway 2 (SH2) Napier to Wairoa was noted
as a significant achievement by a number of submitters. However the ongoing
need to improve linkages between Napier and Wairoa for passenger and road
freight was a common concern. Submitters suggested that sea freight could be
utilised to reduce trucks on SH2.
Regional Rail Services
11. The Discussion Document
generated strong opposing views regarding the future of rail in Hawke’s Bay.
Those in favour of increasing and extending patronage of the existing rail
services outweighed those in favour of closing rail services entirely.
Comments in support of rail suggested:
11.1. a railways development
board could be established to encourage the establishment of a passenger rail
service between Napier and Hastings;
11.2. establish transport
freight hubs in both Napier and Hastings that link the region to Gisborne and
Wellington; and
11.3. encourage Park’n’Ride
passenger services on rail travel between Napier and Hastings.
12. It was considered that
the ongoing patronage of a light rail service between the centres could reduce
private motor vehicles congestion during peak hours and negate the rising cost
of fuel. As mentioned above, submitters also supported the establishment of an
inland port to act as an integrated rail/road freight depot. Freight could
then be moved to the Port of Napier by rail reducing heavy vehicles on Marine
Parade and on other sensitive routes. It was commented that there is a need to
invest in rail for freight – short and long haul – to the Port of Napier.
13. The opposing views
considered that the railroad served no purpose, no further funds should be
directed to rail and that the RLTS should recommend the closure of the Napier
to Gisborne line. It was suggested that funding for rail should be diverted
into upgrading SH2 between Napier and Wairoa.
Alternative Modes of Transport
14. A large number of
submitters made comment on alternative modes of transport and in particular the
importance of promoting of walking and cycling in the region. Cycling should
be promoted for city commuting with bike stands provided in key strategic
locations such as in the CBD, suburban shopping centres and the like. Safe
cycle paths along main routes into urban centres could provide safe and cost
effective transport to work, school and for other short trips.
15. Alternatively, other
submitters commented that while walking and cycling are necessary they do not
support the economy but are the outcomes of a prosperous economy. Road traffic
will continue to grow because of the patterns of population and economic distribution
in the region. Investments in cycling, walking and buses will not provide
freight or job mobility that respects the economy.
Regional Issues
16. The Discussion Document
identified some of the key transportation issues in the region. Having taken
into consideration the issues named in the RLTS 2008 and the comments received
in the pre consultation the key issues for the region are considered to be:
16.1. Ensuring effective
movement of freight within the region and between regions, particularly to and
from the Port of Napier.
16.2. Catering for future
population, land use and economic growth including urban settlement patterns
resulting from the implementation of the Heretaunga Plains Urban Development
Strategy.
16.3. Utilising and
improving existing rail infrastructure and services to provide energy efficient
and economic transport choices.
16.4. Improved efficiency
and route security on key routes.
16.5. Conflicting use of
Marine Parade.
16.6. Supporting
improvements to walking and cycling facilities, and provide greater
opportunities for safe and healthy active non-motorised transport.
16.7. Improving the use of
public transport services and increasing the range of connections between rural
and urban centres.
16.8. Keeping the impact of
the regional transport systems on air quality and water quality to a minimum.
16.9. Wider sustainability
implications relating to climate change and peak oil supply.
16.10. Planning and catering
for the impact of an aging population on preferred transport choices.
16.11. Improvement of road
safety to increase road and personal safety and to reduce injuries and health
costs.
Regional Transportation Vision
17. Having reviewed the RLTS
2008 vision statement and taking into account the comments from submitters on
the Discussion Document, the proposed vision statement has had the word
“integrated” included and now reads:
“Hawke’s Bay moves around on an integrated, safe, sustainable
and resilient transport network that enhances our economy, our health and
lifestyle choices, and connects us to other parts of New Zealand and the
world.”
Objectives
18. At the meeting of 18
February 2011, the Committee considered a number of objectives to be included
in the Discussion Document. The Committee considered that the objectives for
the RLTS 2012 should be inspirational and achievable. After taking into
account both the views of the Committee and the comments received from the
community, the following objectives are put forward to the Committee for their
consideration.
19. Economic Development.
A resilient transport system that supports and
develops the region’s economy because it is easy for people and goods to move
around.
This objective
recognises the role that an affordable effective transport system plays in
supporting the region’s economy. Transport sustains economic development and
standards of living. The sustained growth and economic development of the
regional economy is highly dependent on a coherent, affordable and functional
transport system that facilitates the movement of people, goods and services,
both within the region and beyond.
20. Public Health.
People find it easier to use more active and healthy
methods to get around, and therefore enjoy more physical activity and the many
associated health benefits.
This objective
recognises the effects that a largely car based personal transport system is
having on our health and the environment. People are less physically active,
and transport choices can contribute to this inactivity. The link between
physical activity and good health is well documented. The use of active
transport modes could enable many people to build more physical activity into
their daily routines.
21. Integration and
Responsiveness.
Everyone who needs to be involved in making decisions
about transport is able to express their views. Transport is considered at the
outset and during landuse planning.
This objective
recognises that for transport planning to be effective all agencies with a
stake in transport must act collaboratively. There is a need for partnership
between all parties to exchange ideas about land development and transport. A
range of methods to convey information and facilitate consultation will allow
the community to become better informed.
22. Safety and Personal
Security.
A safe user friendly transport system.
This objective
recognises that road crashes have a huge social and economic cost to the
region, and that the use of some other modes of transport is declining because
of concerns about safety and personal security, whether real or perceived.
23. Environmental
Sustainability.
An environmentally friendly transport system that is
highly efficient for people to use.
This objective
recognises the value the region places on improving the quality of its natural
environment while achieving an integrated, safe, responsive and sustainable
transport system. A sustainable transport system has wide reaching economic,
social and environmental implications for the region and other areas that share
transport linkages.
24. Access and Mobility.
Lots of transport choices so everyone can get around.
This objective
recognises the varied transport needs of the region’s residents. It
acknowledges the need for increased transport choices for personal transport
due to the dispersed nature of the region’s rural communities, an aging
population and the distance between main centres.
Next Steps
25. Once the vision and objectives are confirmed by the
Committee, Council staff will begin the task of policy development and drafting
the RLTS 2012. The next step in the development of the RLTS 2012 is to draft
policy. Studies are being undertaken to identify regional transport issues and
inform the RLTS 2012, these are the Heretaunga Plains Transportation Study and
the Wider Regional Transportation Study. Both of these studies will also
inform the Regional Land Transport Programme by identifying the strategic fit,
affordability and effectiveness of projects.
DECISION MAKING PROCESS
26. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with
Par 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have
assessed the requirements contained within this section of the Act in relation
to this item and have concluded the following:
26.1. Sections 97 and 98 of the Act do not apply as these relate
to decisions that significantly alter the service provision or affect a
strategic asset.
26.2. Sections 83 and 84 covering special consultative procedure
do not apply to the discussion document as the draft Regional Land Transport
Strategy must go through the special consultative process.
26.3. The decision does not fall within the definition of the
Council’s policy on significance.
26.4. Section 80 of the Act covering decisions that are
inconsistent with an existing policy or plan does not apply.
26.5. Council
can exercise its discretion under Section 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Act and
make a decision on this issue without conferring directly with the community or
others having given due consideration to the nature and significance of the
issue to be considered and decided, and also the persons likely to be effected
by or have an interest in the decision to be made.
|
RECOMMENDATION
That Regional Transport Committee
recommends that the Council:
1. Agrees
that the decisions to made are not significant under the criteria contained
in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its
discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the local Government Act 2002
and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the
community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the
decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and
decided.
2. Takes into
account the comments made in the initial consultation process and adopts the
revised issues, vision and objectives for inclusion into the Draft Regional
Land Transport Strategy.
|
|
Esther-Amy Bate
Planner
|
Carol Gilbertson
Transport
Manager
|
Attachment/s
|
1View
|
Summary of
Submissions
|
|
|
|
Summary of Submissions
|
Attachment 1
|
|
|
Name
|
Comments
|
Response
|
|
1
|
Rosemary
Marriott
|
1. Freight
should be moved by train to the Port to relieve trucks off Marine Parade.
2. A
light rail service between the Hastings Rail Station, HB Hospital, EIT and
Munro Street in Napier will relieve parking pressure.
3. There
needs to be a central transport hub in Napier.
4. PT
services are disjointed and uncoordinated. Suburban bus routes require
updating to service new subdivisions for example Havelock North, Westshore
and Bay View. A bus to Bay View could include the airport.
|
1. The
issue of trucks on Marine parade and other sensitive environments is being
investigated as part of the Heretaunga Plans Transportation Study review.
2. NZTA
have signalled that it is not likely given the current economic climate, that
a light rail service will be feasible between Hastings and Napier.
3. City
and inter regional bus services currently use Dalton Street as a centralised
pick up point for patrons in Napier City.
4. Routes for PT services
are constantly being reviewed.
|
|
2
|
Anonymous
|
1. Trucks
should be prohibited on Marine Parade.
2. Designated
truck routes should be established and sign posted that direct trucks to the
expressway away from residential or commercial areas. SH2 from Hastings
should have a ‘truck ban’ sign and trucks diverted to the Expressway away
from Clive. The Expressway should be the No 1 route to the Port/ or for
trucks travelling North from Napier.
|
1. The
issue of trucks on Marine parade and other sensitive environments is being
investigated as part of the Heretaunga Plans Transportation Study review.
2. Managed freight routes
in the region are a principle that Hastings District Council agrees with.
This will be considered as part of the Heretaunga Plains Transport Study and
the Heavy Transport Routes Plan the Hastings District Council is planning to
develop.
|
|
3
|
(Prof)
Robin Gwynn
|
1. Supports
a focus on economic development, but traffic requirements of the Port and
Tourism must not be funnelled into Marine Parade, separation is required.
2. There
is an imbalance against the community and those who have a vested economic
interest in heavy road transport.
3. Rail
should be used for freight movement to and from the Port also as a tourist
route from Napier to Gisborne
4. The
vision should be extended to include a tourist route from Napier to
Wellington.
5. A
regular light rail service should operate between Napier and Hastings morning
and evening on week days to negate the rising cost of fuel.
|
1. The
issue of trucks on Marine parade and other sensitive environments is being
investigated as part of the Heretaunga Plans Transportation Study review.
2.
The RTC is comprised of individuals who represent the many facets of the
community for example health and safety representatives, and locally and
regionally elected councillors. The RTC endeavours to make balanced decisions
that represent all people affected by transportation. Heavy road transport
is not weighted to be of any greater significance than other considerations.
3. Rail
is currently used to move freight to the Port of Napier. The freight may
have originated from other parts of the region or from other regions for
example milk products transported from Taranaki to the Port of Napier. A
rail tourist route from Napier to Gisborne is an idea that is currently
generating some discussion within the region. However the route has yet to
be proven financially viable for tourism.
4. The
vision emphasises the importance of connecting Hawke’s Bay to other parts of
NZ and the world. This includes key connections to Wellington and beyond.
5. A light rail service
between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres may negate the rising cost of fuel for
the individual. However such a service requires further investigation into
the benefits, costs and funding availability.
|
|
4
|
M.
Kepphrol
|
1. Protected
cycle paths along main routes into urban centres in a radius of 10km to
provide for safe and cheap transport to work, school and other activities.
2. Open
school buses and routes up for all rural residents.
|
1. Hastings
District Council is actively promoting this concept through the implementation
of iWay project. They are actively pursuing the expansion and development of
this approach with NZTA on expressway and other routes. Both Napier City
Council and Hastings District Council have cycle strategies which have
considered the needs of cyclists close to the major possible destinations for
cycling.
2. As part of travel
planning co-ordination this idea is viewed as an option to be investigated
and progressed, if it is appropriate.
|
|
5
|
Chris
Denby
|
1. Cycling
should be promoted for city commuting. Councils should explore, encourage and
publicise the use of minor roads for cycling corridors, especially near
schools.
2. Bike
stands should be provided at key strategic locations such as CBD, suburban
shopping centres etc. City design should encourage walking for short trips,
alleyways should be made safe and environmentally friendly
3. Rail
should be encouraged to free the road for lighter traffic and reduce risk of
harm to road users
4. Town
planning should reduce the distances that people need to travel to essential
services to reduce private motorcar use.
|
1. Hastings
District Council is actively promoting this concept through the
implementation of iWay project. The Council is implementing a School Zone
Policy and considering a Safer Route to School Policy. This will create a
safer environment near and on main routes to schools. Both Napier City
Council and Hastings District Council have cycle strategies which have
considered the needs of cyclists close to the major possible destinations for
cycling
2.
Each of the Territorial Local Authorities has a walking and cycling
strategy. The Regional Land Transport Strategy takes into account the need
to improve safe walking and cycling networks and facilities under the primary
object of safety and personal security, public health and environmental
sustainability.
3.
A light rail service between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres may free the road
for lighter traffic and reduce the risk of harm to road users. NZTA have
signalled that it is not likely given the current economic climate, that a
light rail service will be feasible between Hastings and Napier. Such a
service would require further investigation into the benefits, costs and
funding availability.
4. Napier and Hastings are
compact cities with the distance to most essential services well within reach
of cycling and in most cases walking distances. This principle underpins the
land-use and transport strategies and supporting code of practice.
|
|
6
|
Steve
Brightwell
Department
of Conservation
|
1. Supports
the sealing of SH38 for Tourism purposes and environmental benefits.
|
1. WDC
supports these submissions with the view that this investment will enhance
NZ’s international tourist capacity by linking the Rotorua – Hawke’s Bay
tourist route with a world class eco- tourist attraction.
WDC has produced a
report titled Sealing S.H.38 -wider economic analysis which is currently
being analysed by central government.
|
|
7
|
David
Webster
|
1. HB
requires better inter-regional linkages.
2. It
is a strategic necessity to retain the railway link due to rising petrol cost
and scarcity. HB ratepayers should finance and/or subsidise rail services.
3. A
railway board should be established through the combined resources of local
and regional councils.
|
1. Early
signals from the Governments Policy Statement on Transport indicate that
inter-regional linkages are of high importance. The RLTS 2012 will have a
strong focus in this area.
2. NZTA
have signalled that it is not likely given the current economic climate, that
a light rail service will be feasible between Hastings and Napier. Such a
service would require further investigation into the benefits, costs and
funding availability.
3. A representative from
KiwiRail sits on the Regional Transport Committee (RTC) who keeps the committee
informed on any matters involving Rail.
|
|
8
|
Lyndon
Hammond
NZTA
|
1. The
word ‘integrated’ should be included in the vision statement.
2. Important
to consider the new GPS priorities to give clarity to reasoning behind RLTS
key objectives.
3. Marine
parade issue is too narrow; best to take a broader view of conflict
surrounding heavy vehicles and sensitive users around the region – make
statement broader reaching.
4. Should
mention rising fuel prices as opposed to peak oil.
|
1. Agreed,
added to vision.
2.
The existing and soon to be released GPS will be taken into consideration
during the development of the RLTS 2012.
3. The
issue of trucks on Marine parade and other sensitive environments is being
investigated as part of the Heretaunga Plans Transportation Study review.
4. The sustainability
issues relating to oil scarcity are broader than just rising fuel costs. The
Discussion Document does not refer to peak oil. Peak oil is the point in
time when the maximum rate of global petroleum extraction is reached, after which the rate of production
enters terminal decline. The Discussion Document refers instead to wider
sustainability issues relating to oil supply.
|
|
9
|
Brent
Linn
Hawke’s
Bay A&P Society
|
1. The
HB economy is underpinned by primary industries. Due to the geographic
spread of these industries robust roading is required for the movement of
goods and services.
2. Commercial
and personal vehicular transport will continue to be the dominant mode of
transport in HB and infrastructure needs to be focussed on solutions.
|
1.
As part of the information gathering for the RLTS 2012 the RTC is
undertaking a number of studies to identify anticipated deficiencies in the
roading network related to landuse and working with Road Controlling
Authorities to identify roading projects to resolve these deficiencies.
2. Councils are very
cognisant of the importance of infrastructure and take this into account when
making planning decisions.
|
|
10
|
Murray
Douglas
Chamber
of Commerce
|
1. Walking
and cycling options are necessary but do not support the economy - they are
outcomes of a prosperous economy.
2. The
discussion document is set at too “low a bar”.
3. Need
to invest in rail for freight – short and long haul – to the Port.
4. Invest
in alternative transport options.
5. Need
to address potentially conflicting policies i.e. extending Omahu Rd away from
rail infrastructure.
|
1. Walking
and cycling modes of transport go hand in hand with other modes of
transport. The hallmark of a resilient and successful transport system is
one that provides the community with a range of safe and accessible transport
mode choices. Walking and cycling activities promotes good health and a
healthy workforce is necessary for a successful economy. Walking and cycling
are both valid forms of transport which need to be considered by the Regional
Transport Strategy. Both forms of transport are necessary (particularly in a
depressed economy) to ensure commuters can access work places etc more cost
effectively than using private motor cars.
2.
The Discussion Document was released to engage in a conversation with the
community about high level transportation issues. The RLTS 2012 will address
more specific issues and outcomes, and provide specific key actions to
achieve these. The Chambers comments will be taken into consideration during
the development of the RLTS 2012.
3. KiwiRail
continues to work with the Port to ensure the commercial viability of both
the Port and Rail.
4. Land
transport network is an integrated system that serves multiple users and
functions. A balanced approach is needed that it does not promote one mode
exclusively over another.
5. Agreed that various
policies need to be aligned. Availability of development land needs to
acknowledge market demand and provide appropriate choice. Some businesses
require direct access to railways and other will require efficient access to
State Highway network. Land availability also needs to be balanced with
demand for other infrastructure services (dry or wet industries).
|
|
11
|
Karen
Lilburn
|
1. A
light rail service is required between Napier and Hastings that links the
region to Gisborne, Palmerston North and Wellington.
2. Smaller
and more frequent buses are needed.
3. Intercity
buses should go to Flaxmere and Havelock North.
4. Priority
should be given to walking and cycling.
|
1. NZTA
have signalled that it is not likely given the current economic climate, that
a light rail service will be feasible between Hastings and Napier. Such a
service would require further investigation into the benefits, costs and
funding availability.
2.
Council determines the specifications for all their buses based on the
demand on the services. Smaller buses are used when appropriate, e.g. on the
Commuter Express service between Napier and Hastings.
3. Intercity
is a private company, their time tables and location of bus stops are not
within the scope or the jurisdiction of the RLTS 2012, Council could assist
by having an advocacy role.
4. Hastings District
Council is actively promoting the walking and cycling through the
implementation of iWay project. Walking and cycling modes of transport go
hand in hand with other modes of transport. The hallmark of a resilient and
successful transport system is one that provides the community with a range
of safe and accessible transport mode choices. Both Napier and Hastings have
cycle strategies which have considered the needs of cyclists close to the
major possible destinations for cycling.
|
|
12
|
Isobel
Sebley
|
1. Need
to take into account the rising cost of fuel and infrastructure.
2. The
environment should be provided for.
3. Solutions
should be cost effective and take account of the most people.
4. Seal
more roads particularly access to beaches to attract more tourists.
5. Roads
should be raised and metal plated to increase their longevity.
|
1. Affordability
is a key objective in the RLTS 2012.
2.
Environmental sustainability is one of the key themes in the development
of the RLTS 2012. The environment will be provided for.
3. Efficiency
is a key theme in the upcoming GPS. Open and transparent public consultation
enables all sectors of the community to have their views taken into account.
4. There
are 2 factors to consider 1. The sealing of new roads is a costly exercise as
often the roads have to be rebuilt prior to accepting and holding a seal. 2.
The character of an area and the surrounding environment often changes when
sealed roads are constructed which is not always good for the area.
5. Metal plating of a road
is impractical for cost and safety reasons as metal has very little traction.
|
|
13
|
Barrie
Crabbe
|
1. The
railway is underutilised it should be used for freight and passenger
services. Internationally governments are expanding rail because of its
benefits over road freight and passenger transport.
2. An
inland port is required.
3. A
light passenger service is required.
4. The
rail should link major HB centres to other regions i.e. Gisborne and
Wellington. A rail working group should be established.
|
1. Freight
cartage is a key focus for KiwiRail, both regionally and nationally.
Passenger services are unlikely to be given any priority by KiwiRail.
2. A
key action area in the RLTS 2008 was to investigate the development of an
inland rail head for Port of Napier goods traffic and to encourage the uses
of any proposed inland port.
3. NZTA
have signalled that it is not likely given the current economic climate, that
a light rail service will be feasible between Hastings and Napier. Such a
service would require further investigation into the benefits, costs and
funding availability.
4. Rail is currently used
to move freight to the Port of Napier. The freight may have originated from
other parts of the region or from other regions for example milk products
transported from Taranaki to the Port of Napier. Freight tonnage transported
into the region via rail is currently increasing.
|
|
14
|
Judy
Mills & Jenny Baker
Environmental,
Justice and Peace Network
|
1. CO2
emissions and climate change must be taken to consideration. When undertaking
BC the environment and CO2 emissions must be considered.
2. There
is finite and uncertain fuel supply and costs.
3. Travel
patterns will change people will move less and do more locally as
environmental factors feature more importantly in decision making.
4. An
increased aged population will increase reliance on PT.
5. HB
household income are lower than national figures indicating the need for
affordable transport options.
6. Locally
based economies will become more important as sustainability and market
advantages becomes measured in terms of food miles and carbon.
7. An
efficient and integrated land transport system will aid the regional economy.
8. There
will be changes in primary production and industry if climate change becomes
less stable.
9. Local
authorities and regional council need to work together.
10. Road
building and infrastructure will not necessarily improve our economy, the
question should be how is transport contributing to the sustainable use of
resources and economic resilience.
11. Transport
assists the economy but is not the driver of the economy.
12. Rather
than increasing movement of goods should be streamlining modes reducing
distances and increasing efficiency.
13. Better
integration between land use and transport planning, HPUDS is a key document.
14. Integrated
planning for intermodal transport.
15. A
strategy that is consistent with the regions total energy strategy as well as
the guidelines of the Nation Energy and Conservation Strategy.
16. Suggested
vision statement “In HB people and goods can travel efficiently and safely
using a wide range of integrated transport options that support regional,
national and international goals for environmental sustainability, public
health and climate change mitigation, while maintaining current levels of
economic growth”.
17. Strategy
should integrate modes of transport e.g. park and ride, bikes on buses, work
place travel plans.
18. Encourage
the development of an inland port.
19. Increase
areas of indigenous biodiversity along road networks.
|
1. Environment
sustainability issues to be considered in the RLTS 2012 include energy
efficiency, reducing environmental effects on the environment (including CO2)
and the effects of Climate Change. These are issues that were previously
considered in the RLTS 2008.
2.
There is uncertainty about fuel supply and costs. However new
technologies are emerging in exploration and extraction of oil and in
alternative transport modes and fuels. Both scenarios need to be taken into
consideration for futures planning.
3. This
is speculation and only one of the theories of how the population will adapt
to rising cost and scarcity of fuel. Also define move locally? Within the
region or within the district It would appear to be more likely that people
will continue to travel around the region due to the spatial distribution of
Hawke’s Bay’s population centres.
4. As
the baby boomers reach retirement age there will be an increase in the aged
population and reliance on PT may increase. It is probably that this will
be reflected in the addition of further services and changes to bus routes.
This is a PT matter rather than a RLTS issue.
5. Correct
statistics and feasible interpretation.
6. Possible
but speculation.
7. Agreed
an efficient and integrated land transport system will aid the regional
economy.
8. Agreed
climate change will affect primary production and industry.
9. The
RTC is comprised of politicians and technical experts from each of the four
local authorities and the Regional Council.
10. The
sustainable use of resources and economic resilience is considered a primary
issue for the RLTS 2012 to address.
11. Due
to the spatial distribution of primary producers, manufactures, distances to
markets, and location of the work force; transport is an integral function of
the economy in Hawke’s Bay. It is incorrect to say that transport is not a
driver of the regional economy.
12. The
Regional Council
is currently undertaking studies (HPTS & WRTS) to identify deficiencies
in the transport network. This work will be used to plan network upgrades
and new works to increase efficiency.
13. Land
use and in particular HPUDS has been taken into account in the model
parameters for the HPTS and the WRTS.
14. Integration
of all modes of transport is a key objective of the RLTS 2012.
15. The
RLTS 2012 will be consistent within the National and Regional Policy
framework and will take into account the National Energy Efficiency and
Conservation Strategy.
16. Suggested
vision acknowledged and taken into account when drafting revised vision.
17. Integration
of all modes of transport is a key objective of the RLTS 2012.
18. The
development of an inland port is consistent with the RLTS 2008 and the
Discussion Document.
19. Could be included into
the RLTS 2012 as developing and maintenance of infrastructure to reduce the
effects of runoff from road networks on the environment.
|
|
15
|
Audrey
Jones
|
1. Wants
RTC to prioritise the sealing of SH38.
|
1. WDC
supports these submissions with the view that this investment will enhance
NZ’s international tourist capacity by linking the Rotorua – Hawke’s Bay
tourist route with a world class eco- tourist attraction.
WDC
has produced a report titled Sealing S.H.38 -wider economic analysis which is
currently being analysed by central government
|
|
16
|
Jim
Haliburton
|
1. Now
that the Matahorua gorge bridge is complete the Waikari and Waikoau should
also be bridged to allow a new road from Kotemaori down the valley to
Eskdale.
2. Unless
the rail line is linked from Gisborne to Bay of Plenty and Auckland it should
be closed.
3. More
sea freight should be utilised to take trucks off the roads.
4. Presently
all that occurs is maintenance of the Old Coach Road.
|
1. WDC
supports continuous prioritised improvements to the Hawke’s Bay-Poverty Bay
road link.
2.
A light rail service between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres and other regions
may be investigated in the future. However such a service requires further
investigation into the benefits, costs and funding availability. Rail
freight from other areas to the Port of Napier may occur in the future should
this be economically feasible.
3. Sea
freight is used to move goods to national and international markets. Further
development of the Port is expected to continue. It is questionable whether
this will take trucks off the roads or increase freight trucks to the Port.
4. This was originally
investigated by the Ministry of Works as an alternative to State Highway 2.
NZTA may want to reconsider this option again into the future. However, it
may not be able to be economically justified due to the expense of bridge
crossings and required upgrading of the existing roading pavements.
|
|
17
|
Rex
McIntyre
|
1. The
Napier/Wairoa State Highway is not of State Highway standard.
2. The
SH upgrade needs to be a priority is it is vital to the wellbeing of Wairoa.
3. The
railroad serves no purpose to Wairoa.
4. No
more money should be spent on the railway.
5. The
RLTS should recommend closing the railway.
6. A
deal should be done with govt to divert rail funding into upgrading the SH.
|
1. S.H.2
between Wairoa and Napier has historically been a challenging section of road
and all good maintenance strategies and improvements assist in the economic
well being of the entire region.
2. WDC
supports these submissions with the view that this investment will enhance
NZ’s international tourist capacity by linking the Rotorua - Hawke's Bay
tourist route with a world class eco- tourist attraction.
WDC
has produced a report titled Sealing S.H.38 -wider economic analysis which is
currently being analysed by central government.
3. A
light rail service between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres and other regions may
be investigated in the future. However such a service requires further
investigation into the benefits, costs and funding availability. Rail
freight from other areas to the Port of Napier may occur in the future should
this be economically feasible.
4. Opinion
acknowledged.
5. Further
investigations into the benefit/costs of retaining the railroad are underway.
6. Funding from NZTA for
SH is applied for through the NLTP and RLTP process. The RTC ranks projects
according to strategic fit, effectiveness and efficiency for the region.
Each project also has a national ranking. The process is managed by the NZTA
and is transparent at national and regional level. Kiwirail are responsible
for the development and maintenance of rail infrastructure.
|
|
18
|
Vivenne
Wharehoka
|
1. Rail
and Road should be further integrated with freight depots to facilitate
linkages.
2. The
rail between Gisborne to Wellington should be retained. Supports a daily rail
commuter service between centres.
3. Need
smaller buses to better facilitate route efficiency.
4. Transport
needs to promote effective and sustainable communities.
5. Rural
areas are increasingly isolated yet they have greatest potential.
6. Needs
better accessibility.
|
1. Integration
of all modes of transport is a key objective of the RLTS 2012.
2.
A light rail service between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres and other regions
may be feasible in the future. However such a service requires further
investigation into the benefits, costs and funding availability.
3. Council
determines the specifications for all their buses based on the demand on the
services. Smaller buses are used when appropriate, e.g. on the Commuter
Express service between Napier and Hastings.
4. Effective
transport networks will support communities by linking them with essential
services, employment and to other communities.
5. As
the roading network improves communities are less isolated particularly rural
communities.
6. Increased accessibility
and mobility are key objectives of the RLTS 2012.
|
|
19
|
Richard
Barfoot
|
1. Trucks
must be diverted off Marine Parade. Restrictions to the use of Marine Parade
for all Port bound traffic must be imposed and policed.
2. Due
to rising cost of fuel an integrated railway system must be considered.
3. The
Port of Napier could be sited away from Ahuriri and the existing
infrastructure developed for tourism.
|
1. The
issue of trucks on Marine parade and other sensitive environments is being
investigated as part of the Heretaunga Plans Transportation Study review
2.
A light rail service between Hawke’s Bay’s major centres and other regions
may be investigated in the future. NZTA have signalled that it is not likely
given the current economic climate, that a light rail service will be
feasible between Hastings and Napier. However such a service requires
further investigation into the benefits, costs and funding availability.
Rail freight from other areas to the Port of Napier may occur in the future
should this be economically feasible.
3. Due to the large
investment in port facilities including land reclamation and a lack of other
suitable site it is not likely that the Port of Napier will be moved to
another location.
|
|
20
|
Murray
Deakin
|
1. SH38
has been neglected and requires sealing.
|
1. WDC
supports these submissions with the view that this investment will enhance NZ’s
international tourist capacity by linking the Rotorua - Hawke’s Bay tourist
route with a world class eco- tourist attraction.
WDC has produced a
report titled Sealing S.H.38 -wider economic analysis which is currently
being analysed by central government.
|
|
21
|
Colin
Stone
Sport
Hawke’s Bay
|
1. Develop
cycling and walking infrastructure on drainage reserves.
2. Strategy
should incorporate a regional walking and cycling focus.
3. Needs
further emphasis on education of the use of cycle lanes, both from a motorist
and cyclist perspective.
4. Should
promote bus and ride concept to increase cycling opportunities.
|
1. Drainage
reserves provide an ideal opportunity and should always be considered at the
planning stage. However, the facilities should only be provided where demand
exists.
2.
Agreed with as part of the balanced approach with other modes of
transport.
3. Hastings
District Council is actively promoting this concept through the
implementation of iWay project. This is also part of our systems approach to
improving road safety that considers all factors related to safety such as
education, infrastructure, vehicle standards and enforcement.
4. Through the development
of the Regional Public Transport Plan the concept of bus and ride is being
investigated and options.
|
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Public Transport Update
REASON FOR
REPORT
1. This agenda item
provides the Committee with an update on public transport services, including
trends since the previous update in November 2010. This report contains
patronage and revenue graphs which are updated each month and provided to this
Committee and the Regional Transport Committee.
General Information
2. The overall performance
of the bus service continues to be positive with good passenger growth and fare
recovery levels. This increased fare recovery enabled further improvements to
be implemented on 5 January 2011. These improvements were very well received by
passengers, and the success of the Sunday trial has resulted in this service
becoming permanent.
Total
Passenger Trips
3. The following graph
outlines total passenger trips from February 2010 to February 2011. The average
monthly trips for this period were 42,926.
4. The total passenger
figures for the past two years were:
· 2009
– 405,102
· 2010
– 514,667
Future reports will
show yearly figures and a moving annual total chart.
1.
2.
Diagram 1 –
Passenger Numbers – February 2009 – February 2011
3.
Patronage
and Financial Trends
6. The graph below shows a
comparison of fare revenue from January 2010 to February 2011. This fare
revenue reflects the increased patronage, as shown in the previous graph. The
total revenue figures for the past two years were:
· 2009
- $680,484
· 2010
- $926,961
Future reports will
show yearly figures and a moving annual total chart.
Diagram 2 –
Total Revenue – February 2009 - February 2011
Capacity
7. Total capacity on
Council’s bus fleet is 107,968 seats, this graph shows the seat capacity
utilised on a monthly basis from February 2010 - February 2011. The average
utilised capacity for this period was 41%.
Diagram 3 –
Capacity February 2010 - February 2011
Farebox
Recovery (total fares as a percentage)
8. The following graph
shows the farebox recovery trend (i.e the total amount of fares), as a percentage,
for each month from February 2010 - February 2011. The average farebox recovery
for this period was 40.6%.
Diagram 4 –
Farebox Recovery February 2010 – February 2011
Proposed
Improvements to Bus Services
9. Staff and service
provider Go Bus are currently investigating a Napier-Ahuriri-Westshore-Napier
trial service. If approved this change could be implemented in July 2011. It is
also anticipated that from July all Hastings services will travel via the new
Nelson Park retail development.
SuperGold
Card Trips
10. The following graph
shows the number of SuperGold cardholder trips from February 2010 - February
2011.
Diagram 5 -
Number of SuperGold Card Trips
Infrastructure
11. Bus Stops – all bus stop
timetables were updated in January to reflect the service improvements.
Other
12. The annual goBay
passenger survey was carried out from 1-13 November. Over 85% of passengers
surveyed rated the overall service, good, very good, or excellent. It was also
pleasing to note that many of the suggested improvements had already been
identified by staff and were included in the January service improvements.
13. New bus timetable
booklets were printed in January, with high demand resulting in a further
re-print in March.
14. Four new ‘passenger
posters’ have been added to the range of advertising material.
15. Work has started on the
new Regional Public Transport Plan, due to become operative in January 2012. An
initial discussion document will be sent to key stakeholders in mid-March. The
Draft Plan will be available for public consultation in June/July.
Travel Plans
16. The first meeting of the
St Mary’s School Travel Plan (STP) working party is to take place on 22 March.
Lucknow School have postponed their STP until term 2.
17. HBRC’s workplace travel
plan is underway. Staff have been offered the opportunity to try public
transport for a 2-week period from 4-17 April.
Total
Mobility Update
18. Below is a table showing
details of client numbers and expenditure to date for the 2010/11 financial
year. (February statistics were unavailable at the time this report was
compiled).
Diagram 6 –
Total Mobility Statistics
DECISION
MAKING PROCESS
19. Council is required to
make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government
Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within this
section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this
report is for information only and no decision is to be made, the decision
making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply.
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the
Regional Transport Committee receives the Public Transport Update.
|
|
Carol Gilbertson
Transport
Manager
|
Attachment/s
There are no
attachments for this report.
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Regional Public Transport Plan -
Initial Consultation Summary
REASON FOR REPORT:
1. The purpose of this
report is to provide the Committee with a summary of responses received to the
initial consultation undertaken on the Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP).
Background
2. The RPTP Project Team
approved an initial discussion document to go out to targeted stakeholders
during March 2011. The discussion document asked some key questions and the
responses, where appropriate, will be taken into account when drafting the
Draft Regional Public Transport Plan to go out for public consultation. This
initial targeted consultation is a requirement under the Public Transport
Management Act (PTMA).
3. The discussion document
was distributed to 52 identified key stakeholders and 19 responses were
received. A summary of the comments received is attached to this report for the
committee’s information.
Feedback
4. The consultation asked
stakeholders specific key questions on the following issues:
4.1. Current Public
Transport Services
4.2. Funding/Bus Fares
(including Farebox Recovery Policy)
4.3. Transport
Disadvantaged
4.4. Bus Service Support
Infrastructure
4.5. Bikes on Buses
4.6. Future Rail Services
and Inter-Regional Bus Services (e.g. Napier/Hastings to Auckland)
4.7. Technology
4.8. Other Services (Total
Mobility Scheme; concession fares)
Next Steps
5. The next step is to
prepare a Draft RPTP to go out for public consultation, following the special consultation
procedures in the Local Government Act. The Draft Plan is to be released for
consultation in June 2011.
DECISION MAKING PROCESS:
6. Council is required to
make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government
Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within this
section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this
report is for information only and no decision is to be made, the decision
making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply.
|
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the
Regional Transport Committee notes the responses to the Draft Regional Public
Transport Plan and receives this report.
|
|
Megan Welsby
Sustainable
Transport Coordinator
|
Carol Gilbertson
Transport
Manager
|
Attachment/s
|
1View
|
RPTP
Discussion Document Responses
|
|
|
|
RPTP Discussion Document Responses
|
Attachment 1
|
Regional Public
Transport Plan – Discussion Document Responses
|
|
Name
|
Comments
|
|
1
|
Ruth
Lockley – Age Concern
|
· Bus
fares about right
· Very
appreciative of SuperGold card
· Maintain
customer service levels/supportive manner of drivers
· Discounted
fares for disabled (chronic health conditions and age related mobility needs)
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Supports
text-bus/digital signage at main bus stops
· Total
Mobility Scheme – ‘a godsend’.
· Funding
for transport disadvantaged should come from NZTA
|
|
2
|
Idea
Services Management Team
|
· PT
needed in Bridge Pa, Clive, Haumoana, Te Awanga, Clifton, Bayview, CHB,
Wairoa
· More
runs/increased timetable
· Bus
fares about right
· Limited
use of wheelchair friendly vehicles at peak times
· Increase
Total Mobility Scheme
· Discounted
fares for disabled (anyone who is unable to use their own personal transport
safely)
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Supports
Napier/Hastings to Auckland rail link
· Intercity
services need toilet facilities
· Yes
to technology
|
|
3
|
Rosemary
Marriott – Private
|
· Rates
should be revisited to incorporate areas not currently serviced by PT
· Support
for assessing needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares about right
· Reorganisation
of routes essential to identify low patronage routes
· Suggests
household survey to identify which areas want PT
· Should
provide buses for family events
· Identified
provisions should be funded by fuel levies
· Discounted
fares for visually impaired, physically disabled and all who qualify for a
disability parking permit
· All
bus stops should have shelters that are highly visible
· Supports
bikes on commuter buses only
· Supports
commuter trains between Napier and Hastings, also trains between Waipukurau
and the Port
· Doesn’t
believe the Total Mobility Scheme meets the needs of disabled people
|
|
4
|
Oliver
Postings – NZTA
|
· Highlights
potential funding constraints that might arise over the next NLTP period
· Difficult
to justify growth in Wairoa/CHB in terms of GPS and NZTA’s Investment &
Revenue Strategy
· Pleasing
to see farebox recovery of 41%. Careful adjustment of fares should increase
this further to the national target of 50%
· NZTA
expectation of an annual fare review
· Suggest
replacing the words ‘maximising revenue’ with ‘improve farebox recovery’
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Role
of rail for public transport is highly unlikely given the high cost of
upgrading the system and the low population, more discussion required
· NZTA
working with PT stakeholders to develop a bus quality standard as a condition
of funding
|
|
5
|
Lindsay
Scott – WINZ
|
· 15,000
people in HB receive a benefit. Need PT to access services, employment and
training
· Supports
assessing transport needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Recommend
using the toolkit developed by the Office of Disability Issues to provide a
disability perspective
· Believe
many people are unaware of the Total Mobility Scheme
· WINZ
provide financial travel assistance to eligible people with disability and
those requiring health services within and outside HB
· Plan
should consider access to services for low/middle income in terms of access
to employment
|
|
6
|
Kate
Kerr – CCS
|
· Services
needed in Bayview, Ahuriri and the Hill
· Supports
assessing transport needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Location
of bus stops can be an issue
· Bus
fares about right
· Need
more bus stops, shelters, later services, additional routes
· Agrees
with discounted fares for disabled people and all people who are
disadvantaged
· Would
like to see more space for wheelchairs, large print timetables
· Doesn’t
believe bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops would make PT a viable option
· Inter-regional
services/infrastructure doesn’t meet needs of travellers
· Suggest
driver training to raise awareness of the limitations of some passengers
· Issues
around road crossings near bus stops
|
|
7
|
Staff
and Students –
Real
People@Mosaic
|
· Services
needed in Onekawa, Bayview, the Hill, Ahuriri, Airport
· Supports
assessing transport needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Fares
about right
· More
school buses – horrible for the general public
· More
buses, later services, more bus stops/shelters
· Separate
services for EIT/school children
· Smaller
buses as well as bigger buses
· Discounts
for travelling in off-peak times
· Non-drivers,
people with Aspergers/epilepsy/mental illness etc should get discounted fares
· People
should be means tested to qualify for discounted fares
· Uniformity
of bus shelters, signage, road markings
· Supports
a bike trailer to hook on the back of the bus
· Green
bike service
· Bring
back the Bay Express
· Commuter
train between Napier and Hastings
· Supports
technology and crossover for ticket use
· Total
Mobility Service meets the needs
· DHB
should fund more services for health
· Drivers
need microphones to talk to people at the back of the bus
|
|
8
|
Vicki
Butterworth – BikeNZ
|
· Link
EIT To Hastings via Omahu Road industrial area
· Link
Regional Sports Park to services
· Doesn’t
support assessing transport needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares about right
· Supports
bikes on buses and secure/covered bike racks at bus stops
· All
bus stops should have shelters for easy identification
· If
rail lines not being used, turn into a cycle trail
· Supports
a cash-less system
|
|
9
|
Jeremy
Dunningham – Cycle Aware HB
|
· Supports
services in Ahuriri, Westshore, Bayview and Whirinaki
· Doesn’t
support assessing transport needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares about right, suggest any rises would have a negative impact
· Offer
a ‘free travel day’ once a month
· Train
drivers to offer and encourage use of goBay smartcards
· Card
top up via internet, cell-phone, credit card
· Transport
disadvantaged - anyone without access to a car, who can’t get to a bus stop
· Supports
bikes on buses and secure bike racks at bus stops
· Some
bus stops ill-defined with minimal markings and no shelters
· Would
like to see a quick and final decision on the rail line, use it either as a
rail tourist line, or a cycle trail to equal or surpass the Otago rail trail
· HBRC
should put serious pressure on NCC to come up with a sustainable and
welcoming facility for inter-city travellers, that befits a tourist city
· HBRC
should position itself ready to react when rising oil prices force even more
people to use PT
|
|
10
|
Mrs
J M Barker – Parkinson’s HB
|
· Support
for assessing needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares too high for tertiary students/children, about right for other people
· Carriers
for walking frames
· Further
subsidised fares
· Produce
a disability card to be signed by a Doctor
· Disability
– any condition which hinders a person from living a normal healthy life
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Doesn’t
see a role for rail services
|
|
11
|
Emma
Foster – DHB
|
· Lack
of bus service in Ahuriri/Westshore noted. Increasing number of retirees in
these areas
· Support
for assessing needs in Wairoa/CHB, via consultation with residents and Maori
communities, including Papakainga.
· Would
like to see night services out of the main centres to suburban hubs
· Lack
of evening/weekend services for youth
· PT
is an enabler for quality of life fore people without private transport, or
people unable to drive
· Community
Services cards linked to patronage discounts
· Discounting
fares for disabled people is contrary to the NZ Disability Strategy.
Discounted fares should be aimed at low income people i.e. Community Services
cardholders, rather than stigmatizing people with a disability. Not
appropriate to classify people by disability
· Total
Mobility Scheme meets the objectives of the scheme
· Supports
bikes on buses/secure bike racks at bus stops
· Commuter
rail may be difficult in economic reality, the emphasis should be on freight
and removing heavy trucks from roads
· Inter-city
terminals in Napier and Hastings need upgrading
· Support web
based route planning integrating bike/walk/PT routes
|
|
12
|
Henry
Enslin and Neil Taylor – NCC
|
· Bayview
and Westshore should be included on the network
· Transport
disadvantaged defined as elderly and lower socio-economic group
· Supports
discounted fares for disabled people
· Defines
disability as any person with limited ability to see or hear properly , or
that has to move about with the aid of some form of mechanical assistance
· Supports
bikes on buses
· Don’t
believe bike racks at bus stops make PT a more viable option
· Inter-regional
bus services/infrastructure inadequate
|
|
13
|
Brian
Fisher – Fish Bike
|
· Bayview,
Westshore, Ahuriri
· Develop a
network of bike storage lockers to enable cyclists to store bike and ride the
bus
|
|
14
|
Sarah
Potter – Age Concern
|
· Ahuriri,
Greenmeadows, Taradale Road
· Support
for assessing needs in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares about right
· Incentives,
every 10th trip free
· Defines
transport disadvantaged as seniors no longer able to drive and people in
areas without bus services
· Utilise
fund organisations such as Age Concern to extend services
· Supports
discounted fares for disabled people
· Defines
disability as impairment or limitation (physical, sensory or mental) that
prevents a person from carrying out regular activities of daily life and
restricts a persons independence (an incapacity)
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Bus
stop signage needs to be more obvious, currently difficult for visually
impaired people
· Increased
fuel costs may mean rail transport may become more financially appealing
· Inter-regional
bus services/infrastructure inadequate
|
|
15
|
Owen
Wilson – RNZFB member
|
· Services
needed in Wairoa/CHB
· Bus
fares too high
· Services
needed in Ahuriri/Westshore for disabled/elderly people living there
· Difficult
for blind people to find bus stops
· Supports
discounted fares for disabled people
· Discount
on production of an RNZFB registered blind card (strict registration
criteria)
· Rail
between cities is a must with rising fuel/parking costs. Rail systems
overseas being upgraded
· Aware of the
Total Mobility Scheme, but expensive on a low income
|
|
16
|
Colin
Stone – Sport HB
|
· Like
to ensure there are regular bus services to the Regional Sports Park
· Bus
fares about right
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
|
|
17
|
Sally
Phelps – ACC
|
· Commuter
Express bus stop in Taradale
· Bus
fares about right
· Lower
socio-economic families are transport disadvantaged
· Supports
discounted fares for disabled people
· Supports
bikes on buses/bike racks at bus stops
· Supports
commuter rail service
· Inter-regional
bus services/infrastructure inadequate
· Supports text services for
timetables
|
|
18
|
Margaret
Carswell – Total Mobility Scheme
|
· Council to
investigate smartcards for the Total Mobility Scheme within the next 5 years
|
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: NZTA Regional Director's Report
REASON FOR REPORT
1. This item introduces
the NZTA Central Region Regional Director’s report as provided in Attachment 1.
DECISION MAKING
PROCESS
2. Council is required to
make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government
Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within this
section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this
report is for information only and no decision is to be made, the decision
making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply.
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the
Committee receives the Regional Director’s Report.
|
|
Carol Gilbertson
transport
Manager
|
|
Attachment/s
|
1View
|
Regional
Director's Report - April
|
|
|
|
Regional Director's Report - April
|
Attachment 1
|
|
To:
|
Hawke’s
Bay Regional Transport Committee
|
|
From:
|
Jenny
Chetwynd – NZTA Regional Director Central
|
|
Date:
|
12
April 2011
|
|
The
purpose of this report is:
· to provide an
update on NZTA’s role in the delivery of the Regional Land Transport Strategy
and the National Land Transport Programme in the Hawke’s Bay Region
· to provide an
update on key initiatives that may impact the strategic development of the
regional transport network
|
1.0 NLTP
IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE
1.1 Update on State Highway and Network Ops Activities in the NLTP
As
noted in our report to the RTC in February 2011, the delivery of regional State
highway activities is generally on track. Two large stimulus projects at the
Matahorua Gorge and SH50A Southern Extension, were opened as planned on 11
March, 2011 by the Minister of Transport. A passing lane south of the SH2/50
intersection was also opened this year, with the northbound passing lane at Te
Mahunga on SH2 south of Hastings due to open later in the year.
Structural
issues on the Mohaka Bridge on SH5 escalated since our last report. A crack in
a structural component of the bridge led to weight restrictions being imposed
in March. The crack has since been repaired and we are continuing to reinforce
other structural elements of the bridge, in accordance with our ongoing
monitoring programme. It is expected that all load restrictions will be removed
once the reinforcement work has been completed. Investigations are also
continuing to quantify High Productivity Motovr Vehicle (HPMV) capability and
identify the best value for money option to deal with deck maintenance.
Investigation
work on the Waitangi Washout Bridge on State Highway 2 south of Napier is
complete. Staff are currently analysing these findings to determine whether
replacement represents the best value for money outcome.
Good
progress has been made on the Hawke’s Bay pavement renewal programme, which is
almost complete. Work is continuing on restoring pavement damaged during storm
events in October 2010 and February 2011. We are about to complete a temporary
two lane bypass at Tarawera on SH5 with permanent reinstatement expected before
Christmas. Work is continuing at Waikoau Hill and will be completed before
winter.
1.2 State
Highway Plan 2011/12
NZTA is about to release its 2011/12 State Highway Plan. The plan details the extent of proposed operations, maintenance
and improvement work for the next financial year being the last year of the
current three year NLTP.
The plan includes the Hawke’s Bay
and Gisborne regions and will be available shortly on the NZTA website. It
details three categories for improvement works:
· Committed
(already progressing)
· Planned
(high priority and funded)
· Potential
(lower priority and subject to funding availability)
Some key features of the Hawke’s
Bay plan include:
· Approximately
$2.8M of various stages of committed large and block projects that are currenly
in hand. This includes completion works on the Southern Extension and Matahoura
Gorge projects.
· Funding
is committed for the investigation phase of one large project (Tarawera Hill
realignment) and 8 block projects, and the design stage for 5 block projects.
· Planned
new starts include Prebensen/Hyderabad interchange design and Poukawa Swamp passing lane construction
· The
plan details a healthy number of potential new starts that we will promote if
funding becomes available.
Further
details on the State Highway programme is provided in Appendix 1
1.2
Update on NLTP Funding Approvals by the NZTA
In
the February 2011 funding review approvals were given for:
· Emergency
works in Central Hawke’s Bay – cost scope adjustment.
· Investigation
of high productivity routes in Hawke’s Bay ( Highways and Network operations
and Central Hawke’s Bay District Council who are managing funding on behalf of
others TA’s in the HB region).
· Highways
and Network Operations emergency work (result of the January storm event).
· Public
Transport -Hawke’s Bay Regional Council cost scope adjustment.
In
the March 2011 funding review approval was given for:
· Hastings
District Council Corridor Planning Study
2.0 OTHER
NZTA & MOT INITIATIVES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE
2.1 High
Productivity Motor Vehicle (HPMV) routes
|
Significance to RTC
|
Supporting
the provision of effective connections for economic growth and productivity
|
|
Details
|
A
draft report on HPMV capability, demand and development requirements across
the regional network has been completed has been distributed to district
councils for feedback.
While
HPMV vehicles are already using some routes within Hawke’s Bay. The report
seeks to identify all routes that should be made available for HMPV routes,
quantifies the works that would be required to bring these routes up to the
standards required, and recommends the priorities that should be assigned to
this work.
General
findings from the draft report include:
· Structural
limitations on some routes mean alternate HPMV load configurations are
considered, including 53 and 48 tonne options. Indicatively seven state
highway bridges will require $11M (total) upgrades to take more than 44 tonne
loads, and ten more need $2M (total) over the next 20 years.
· Seven TLA
structures need $12M to get above 44 tonnes, and nine more need $2.5M/20
years.
· State Highway
pavement impact rough-order costs are $9M/20 years, with analysis continuing
on TLA roads.
· Route analysis
and investment profiles will consider staged upgrade options.
The
final report will be presented to the RTC at the next meeting.
Following
completion of the report, the next steps will include refining cost
implications for structures and pavement, as well as determining funding
profiles and investment priorities.
|
2.2
Streamlining
|
Significance to RTC
|
Will
impact 2012-15 RLTP & NLTP processes
|
|
Details
|
The
Streamlining Transport Invesment project is working towards streamlining the
transport planning, programming and funding allocation system, with the
intent of improving customer service and reducing compliance costs. The
project intends to move the NZTA from a focus on funding for outputs, towards
investing for outcomes.
A
presentation on streamlining was given to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Advisory
Group on 15 April 2011. The NZTA will incorporate feedback from that
discussion and provide a presentation on streamlining to the next RTC
meeting.
|
2.3 State
Highway Classification
|
Significance to RTC
|
Impacts
on regional state highway networks and NLTP development.
|
|
Details
|
A
state highway classification system is currently under development by NZTA,
with support from the Ministery of Transport. The classification system is a
tool to help NZTA set the long term strategic direction of the state highway
network and will form part of the State Highway Network Strategy, which is
currently under development. It will be an important contribution to long
term land transport planning for NZ.
Consultation
on a draft state
highway classification system closed 31 March 2011. Approximately
60 submissions were received, including one from the Hawke’s Bay RTC, and
these are now being considered. The NZTA Board is due to consider these
issues In May 2011.
|
2.4
SH38 Upgrade
|
Significance to RTC
|
Inter-regional
issue
|
|
Details
|
NZTA
has completed its work with Wairora District Council to resolve differences
in cost estimates to upgrade SH38.
|
2.5
Model Communities
|
Significance to RTC
|
Regional
significance
|
|
Details
|
The
Model Communities Initiative (iWays) was formally launched late in January
with event promotions coinciding with the February Bikewise Month and the
iWays March walking promotion.
The
rate of infrastructure construction has increased. Design on the Flaxmere
and Omahu Road arterials is being finalised along with other roads and
intersections in the city. Corridor planning studies of four arterial routes
have commenced with a focus on all transport modes including walking and
cycling. Tenders have been received for work on intersections, and footpath
renewal and upgrading continues.
Education
and cycle training has commenced in schools, with travel planning due to
start in two schools shortly. A presentaiton on iWays is also being rolled
out to school proncipals.
There
has been a significant ammount of advertising through local media. The “Go by
Bike” and “Commuter challenges” were successful events as was the “Try a Bike
/Bike Mart’ day.
|
2.6
National Infrastructure Plan
|
Significance to RTC
|
Key
part of the transport sector strategic policy framework
|
|
Details
|
The
second iteration of the National Infrastructure Plan (NIP) is currently under
dvelopment. The NIP describes the Government’s current infrastructure
investment plans and policy programmes, and sets out areas of future focus.
The aim of the second version will be to create a common understanding of the
long-term infrastructure issues facing NZ and help coordinate the national
response to those issues, across infrastructure sectors and owners.
Consultation
with stakeholders closed on 1 March 2011 and the MoT are now developing a
second draft of the NIP.
|
|
Regional Director's Report - April
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix
1: Hawke’s Bay Regional State Highway and Network Operations Activities in the
NLTP
The
following table provides an update on state highway activities in the National
Land Transport Programme. Progress against the NLTP is shown as follows:
Green: achieved or on
track to deliver against the NLTP (as at August 2009)
Amber: issues affecting
deliver against NLTP expectations
Red: initiative/project
phase at significant risk of not being deliver or completed e.g. due to a fall
in funding priorities
|
NLTP
Activity -
(Committed,
probable and possible phases only)
|
Phase
|
Status
|
Comment
|
|
Renewals
|
|
OK
|
|
|
Operation and Maintenance
|
|
OK
|
|
|
New and Improved infrastructure
|
|
|
|
|
Matahorua
Gorge Realignment
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
Opened 11 March 2011.
|
|
SH50
Southern Extension (HB Expressway)
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
Opened 11 March 2011.
|
|
Waipukurau Overbridge
Realignment
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
|
|
Dillons
Hill Realignment
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
|
|
Dillons
Hill Realignment Stage 2
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
|
|
Waitangi Washout Bridge
Replacement
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Pending
outcome of load capacity and condition analysis
|
|
Tarawera
Hill Realignment and PL
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Continuing
to progress scoping stage & Iwi liaison
|
|
SH2
South of SH50 Passing Lane
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
- opened Feb 2011.
|
|
SH2
/50 Intersection Improvements
|
Construction
|
Caution
|
Potential
start in 2011/12 – will be subject to funding availability.
|
|
College
Rd to Silverstream
|
Design
|
OK
|
Design
programmed for completion August 2011.
|
|
SH2
Poukawa Swamp Southbound Passing Lane
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Scheduled
for start in 2011/12
|
|
SH2
Poukawa Swamp Northbound Passing Lane
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
SH2
Opapa Passing Lane
Northbound
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended, due to fall in funding priority
|
|
SH2
Opapa Passing Lane
Southbound
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Corkscrew
Gully Northbound Passing Lane
|
Design
|
Caution
|
Design
completion due 2011/12
|
|
Corkscrew
Gully Southbound Passing Lane
|
Design
|
Caution
|
Design
completion due 2011/12 subject to property purchase and funding
|
|
SH2
Kennals Corner and Curve South
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Early
stages of Investigation, local issues to address with stakeholders.
|
|
Te
Mahanga Nth - Passing Lane
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Opening
date June 2011
|
|
Te
Mahanga Sth - Passing Lane
|
Design
|
Caution
|
Environment
Court hearing outcome is pending in relation to property issues.
|
|
SH2/50A
Paki Paki Intersection with SH50A
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Scoping
study initiated, to be complete mid 2011
|
|
SH2
Napier Rd
Intersection
|
Design
|
OK
|
Design
programmed for completion August 2011.
|
|
SH2
Pilcher Rd
Intersection
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Redundant
project, outcome being delivered through the Napier Road Intersection project
|
|
Glencoe
Gorge Realignment
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
HB
Expressway Kennedy to Ngaruroro Improvements
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Scoping
of options to improve efficiency and safety. Due to be complete end of 2011
|
|
SH5
Glengarry Hill North & Southbound Stock Effluent**
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Completed
March 2011
|
|
Mohaka Bridge Deck Repairs
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Reprogrammed
to start 2011, following outcome of initial investigations & siesmic
retrofit
|
|
SH5
Turangakumu to Windy Gap mass Action
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Tuiroa
Cutting Realignment and Seal Widening
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
HB
Expressway Meeanee Quay Intersection
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Investigation
into crash reduction scheme programmed for 11/12
|
|
Napier Airport to Bay View
Passing Lanes
|
Design
|
OK
|
Design
practically complete
|
|
Bay
View - 70kph Zone Traffic Management
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Bay
View to SH2/SH5 Intersection Seal Widening
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority.
|
|
SH2/SH5
Intersection Improvements
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Scoping
phase complete, initiating SAR.
|
|
Tangoio
Straight Seal Widening
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority.
|
|
SH2
Wairoa Stock Effluent Facility
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Project
on hold pending agreement on regional funding share agreement for physical
works and maintenance
|
|
North
of Tunanui Rd Realignment
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Risk
that project may be suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Whakaki
Rd
Curves Improvements
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Local
land issues to be resolved. Project unlikely to proceed due to fall in
funding priority.
|
|
Tahaenui Bridge Replacement
and Realignment
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Risk
that project may be suspended due to local land issues to be resolved -
reprogrammed for review 2011.
|
|
Gisborne
- Napier Passing Opportunities HB
|
Design
|
OK
|
11
out of 16 initiated. 4 out of 16 practically complete.
|
|
Mangakino Stream Bridge
Replacement
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Opening
date June 2011
|
|
Manga-o-Nuku
Bridges
|
Investigation
|
OK
|
Scoping
due to start in early 2011/12
|
|
Prebensen
Drive/Hyderabad Road
Interchange
|
Investigation,
Design
|
OK
|
Investigation
complete. Design planned for 11/12
|
|
Mohaka
Seismic Retrofit
|
Construction
|
OK
|
Complete
|
|
Tutira
section corridor mass action
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Project
suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
SH5
Te Pohue golf course to Mistletoe mass action
|
Investigation
|
Critical
|
Likely
to be suspended due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Waikaremoana
Seal Extension SH38
|
Design
|
Critical
|
Project
unlikley to proceed due to fall in funding priority
|
|
Walking
and cycling facilities
|
|
|
|
|
Omahu
Rd/Expressway Pedestrian Crossing
|
Investigation
|
Caution
|
Internal
review initiated - liaising with HDC to find a suitable outcome.
|
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: Progress Report on Regional / Joint
Projects
REASON FOR REPORT
1. This item provides a
progress report on the regional and/or jointly funded projects contained in the
National Land Transport Programme for Hawke’s Bay.
Status of
Regional / Jointly Funded Projects
|
Project Name
|
NLTP Category
|
Local funders
|
Scheduled Date
|
Status
|
|
HB Regional Transportation Study – Heretaunga Plains
|
Cat 2
|
HBRC, HDC, NCC, NZTA
|
Year 1 and 2
|
NZTA approved funding
Tender has been awarded to GHD Consultants Ltd.
Stage 1 - has been completed and signed off by the
peer reviewer.
Stage 2 - now completed with land use patterns now
included in the model.
Stage 3 - Initial runs of the deficiency model have
been consistent with expected outcomes.
It is anticipated that the study will be completed
by early August.
|
|
Wider Regional Transport Study
|
Cat 2
|
HBRC
|
Year 2
|
The scope of this project incorporates
inter-regional freight issues particularly between Gisborne and Hawke’s Bay.
The consultant is currently running interviews and
data gathering.
The completion date for the project has been
extended 6 weeks and it is anticipated that the project will be completed in
early August.
|
|
Regional Public Transport Plan (RPTP)
|
Cat 2
|
HBRC
|
Year 1 and 2 (due to be completed Jan 2012)
|
Discussion document completed and sent to targeted
stakeholders during March 2011, responses have been received and will inform
the Draft RPTP which will go out for public consultation during June 2011.
|
DECISION MAKING PROCESS
2. Council is required
to make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local
Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained
within this section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded
that, as this report is for information only and no decision is to be made, the
decision making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply.
|
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the
Regional Transport Committee receives the report titled ‘Progress Report
on Regional / Joint Projects’.
|
|
Esther-Amy Bate
Planner
|
Carol Gilbertson
Transport
Manager
|
Attachment/s
There are no
attachments for this report.
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
Regional
Transport Committee
Wednesday 20 April 2011
SUBJECT: General Business
INTRODUCTION
This
document has been prepared to assist Committee members note the General
Business to be discussed as determined earlier in Agenda Item 8.
|
Item
|
Topic
|
Councillor
/ Staff
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
|
15.
|
|
|
|
16.
|
|
|
