Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council
Date: Wednesday 23 November 2011
Time: 9.00am
Venue: |
Council Chamber Hawke's Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street NAPIER |
Agenda
Item Subject Page
1. Welcome/Prayer/Apologies/Notices
9.15am Rebecca Turner Presentation on behalf of A Better Hawke’s Bay
2. Conflict of Interest Declarations
3. Confirmation of Minutes of the Regional Council Meeting held on 26 October 2011 and the Extraordinary Regional Council Meeting held on 16 November 2011
4. Matters Arising from Minutes of the Regional Council Meeting held on 26 October 2011 and the Extraordinary Regional Council Meeting held on 16 November 2011
5. Action Items from Council Meetings
6. Consideration of General Business Items
Decision Items
7. Affixing of Common Seal
8. Air Quality Plan Change: Approval to Become Operative
9. Investment Company - Supplementary Paper on Governance
10. Recommendations from Corporate and Strategic Committee
11. Borrowing Facility Available to Fund Open Spaces/Community Facilities Projects
12. Recommendations from Asset Management and Biosecurity Meeting
13. Recommendations from the Environmental Management Committee
14. Navigation Safety Bylaw Review
Information or Performance Monitoring
15. November 2011 Work Plan - Looking Forward
16. Chairman's Monthly Report (to be tabled)
17. General Business
Decision Items (Public Excluded)
18. (1.00pm)Port of Napier Limited (PONL) - (1) Resolutions for 23rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Results to 30 September 2011; (2) Statement of Corporate Intent 2011-2014
19. Public Excluded Recommendations from the Asset Management and Biosecurity Committee
20. Confirmation of the Public Excluded Minutes of the Extraordinary Regional Council Meeting held on 16 November 2011
21. Matters Arising from the Public Excluded Minutes of the Extraordinary Regional Council Meeting held on 16 November 2011
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Action Items From Council Meetings
Introduction
1. On the list attached, are items raised at previous Council meetings that require actions or follow-ups. All action items indicate who is responsible for each action, when it is expected to be completed and a brief status comment for each action. Once the items have been completed and reported to Council they will be removed from the list.
Decision Making Process
2. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within this section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded that as this report is for information only and no decision is required in terms of the Local Government Act’s provisions, the decision making procedures set out in the Act do not apply.
1. That Council receives the report “Action Items from Council Meetings”.
|
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
|
1View |
Action Items from Previous Council Meetings |
|
|
Attachment 1 |
Actions from Regional Council Meetings
|
Agenda Item |
Action |
Person Responsible |
Due Date |
Status Comment |
1. |
Pauline Elliott presentation |
Staff to prepare a paper on Council’s regulatory functions related to Oil & Gas exploration and drilling |
Bryce/ Iain M |
Feb12 |
|
2. |
Recommen-dations from the Maori Committee |
Precis of Council’s policy on Significance and what it means to be prepared for dissemination to Maori Committee and Council |
Helen |
Feb12 |
|
3. |
9 month Annual Report Progress |
Develop a strategic approach to Appeals to the Environment Court on consent Decisions, using risk analysis |
Malcolm |
December |
Consents Manager to investigate further and prepare a report for the December Council meeting. |
4. |
Ruataniwha Plains Water Storage Project |
Regular updates to Council or Committee when each milestone is achieved |
Andrew/ Graeme |
Ongoing |
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Affixing Of Common Seal
Comment
1. The Common Seal of the Council has been affixed to the following documents and signed by the Chairman or Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive or a Group Manager.
|
|
Seal No. |
Date |
1.1 |
Leasehold Land Sales 1.1.1 Lot 174 DP 10990 CT C1/370 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
1.1.2 Lot 48 DP 8030 CT C2/454 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) Transfer
1.1.3 Lot 5 DP 7201 CT B4/920 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.4 Lot 93 DP 12207 CT D1/1445 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
1.1.5 Lot 86 DP 10121 CT C3/1179 - Transfer
1.1.6 Lot 62 DP 14450 CT G2/711 - Transfer
1.1.7 Lot 22 DP 9788 CT E2/362 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
1.1.8 Lot 64 DP 10513 CT C1/1357 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.9 Lot 147 DP 10912 CT D3/593 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase - Transfer
1.1.10 Lot 16 DP 13899 CT F4/435 - Transfer
1.1.11 Lot 2 DP 13751 CT G3/1003 Lots 1 & 2, DP 10715 Lot 2 DP 14592 CT Y1/26 - Transfer
1.1.12 Lot 14 DP 15123 CT G4/1412 - Transfer
1.1.13 Lot 138 DP 7201 CT B4/939 - Transfer
1.1.14 Lot 20 DP 12309 CT D2/499 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.15 Lot 64 DP 10513 CT C1/1357 - Transfer
1.1.16 Lot 1 DP 11718 CT C3/254 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
1.1.17 Lot 82 DP 10632 CT B4/409 - Transfer
1.1.18 Lot 7 DP 13899 CT F4/429 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.19 Lot 179 DP 11149 CT B1/1213 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.20 Lot 33 DP 7201 CT B4/936 - Transfer
1.1.21 Lot 39 DP 4488 CT 55/145 - Transfer
1.1.22 Lot 104 DP 14450 CT G2/730 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.23 Lot 57 DP 12226 CT D2/162 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.24 Lot 74 DP 10246 CT C2/285 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
1.1.25 Lot 223 DP 11194 CT B3/85 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property)
1.1.26 Lot 96 DP 10912 CT D4/924 - Transfer
1.1.27 Lot 78 DP 10912 CT D3/588 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 10% landlord)
1.1.28 Lot 1 DP 14972 CT G4/573 - Agreement for Sale and Purchase (discount 17.5% resides at property) - Transfer
|
3116 3152
3117 3139
3118
3119 3158
3120
3121
3122 3157
3123
3124 3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3134
3135 3145
3136
3137
3138
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144 3146
3147
3148
3149
3150 3151
|
25 October 2011 14 November 2011
25 October 2011
25 October 2011
25 October 2011 18 November 2011
25 October 2011
25 October 2011
26 October 2011 15 November 2011
26 October 2011
28 October 2011 28 October 2011
28 October 2011
28 October 2011
1 November 2011
1 November 2011
1 November 2011
1 November 2011
2 November 2011 10 November 2011
2 November 2011
4 November 2011
7 November 2011
9 November 2011
9 November 2011
9 November 2011
9 November 2011
10 November 2011 10 November 2011
10 November 2011
10 November 2011
11 November 2011
14 November 2011 14 November 2011
|
1.2 |
Deed of Funding Ministry for the Environment to HBRC (on behalf of the National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS) Steering Group) for funding towards the Local Authority Environmental Monitoring Group’s (LAEMG) project relating to production of Environmental Monitoring Standards for the collection of continuously monitored freshwater data
|
3132 |
1 November 2011 |
1.3 P |
Application for Allocation of NZU’s under the Emissions Trading Scheme – Pre-1990 Forest Land
|
3133 |
1 November 2011 |
1.4 |
Staff Warrants 1.4.1 H. Codlin (Delegations under Resource Management Act 1991; Civil Defence Act 1983 (s.60-64); Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 (s.86-91)and Local Government Act 2002 (s.174))
1.4.2 L. Pearse (Delegations by Group Controller under Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002; Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941; Land Drainage Act 1908; Civil Defence Act 1983 (s.60-64); Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 (s.86-91)and Local Government Act 2002 (s.174))
1.4.3 N. Simpson (Delegations by Group Controller under Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002; Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941; Land Drainage Act 1908; Civil Defence Act 1983 (s.60-64); Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 (s.86-91)and Local Government Act 2002 (s.174))
1.4.4 I. Macdonald (Delegations by Group Controller under Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002; Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941; Land Drainage Act 1908; Civil Defence Act 1983 (s.60-64); Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 (s.86-91)and Local Government Act 2002 (s.174))
|
3131
3154
3155
3156 |
1 November 2011
15 November 2011
15 November 2011
15 November 2011 |
1.5 |
Subvention Agreement Port of Napier Limited and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
|
3153 |
15 November 2011 |
Decision Making Process
2. Council is required to make every decision in accordance with the provisions of Sections 77, 78, 80, 81 and 82 of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within these sections of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded the following:
2.1 Sections 97 and 88 of the Act do not apply;
2.2 Council can exercise its discretion under Section 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Act and make a decision on this issue without conferring directly with the community or others due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided;
2.3 That the decision to apply the Common Seal reflects previous policy or other decisions of Council which (where applicable) will have been subject to the Act’s required decision making process.
That Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. 2. Confirms the action to affix the Common Seal. |
Diane Wisely Executive Assistant |
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Air Quality Plan Change: Approval To Become Operative
Reason for Report
1. The purposes of this report are twofold:
1.1. Appeals against Council’s decisions on Change 2 to the Regional Resource Management Plan (Change 2) have all been resolved without the need for any Environment Court hearings. This paper outlines the last procedural steps that Council must take in order to make Change 2 operative.
1.2. Reporting minor amendments to Change 2 made by staff under delegated authority as a consequence of revisions to the 2011 National Environmental Standards for Air Quality (NESAQ).
Making the Plan Operative
2. At its meeting in October, Council agreed in principle to approve Change 2, and set the operative date to be 1 January 2012. Change 2 was approved only in principle for two key reasons:
2.1. A signed agreement to settle the last remaining appeal (by Solid Energy NZ Limited) had been submitted to the Environment Court, but the Court had yet to approve the agreement; and
2.2. Approving 1 January 2012 as the operative date would provide a lead-in time of nearly three months before the first burner phase-out date came into force. This lead-in allowed time to communicate the timing and implications of Change 2 becoming operative.
3. The Environment Court has now issued its approval (known as a ‘Consent Order’) to settle the last appeal on Change 2. This means all provisions in Change 2 are 'beyond challenge' and deemed operative. While the ‘time of sale’ rule (Rule 18h) is beyond challenge, its title references the ‘plan operative date’ which means it will not come into force until Change 2 is declared operative.
4. Appeals on Variation 2 to the proposed Regional Coastal Environment Plan have also been similarly settled. However, the same steps do not apply to Variation 2 because Variation 2 amends a proposed plan that itself is not yet operative.
5. Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act sets out the process for approving a plan change and making it operative. For Change 2 to become operative, the Council must formally ‘approve’ the Change and then decide on an operative date.
6. It is recommended that the Council approve Change 2 (as set out in Attachment 1) and that public notice be given that Change 2 will become operative from 1 January 2012.
7. Such a decision is merely a procedural step. It is not an opportunity to re-debate the content of Change 2. If Council is inclined to now modify some or all of the content of Change 2, then that must follow due process as a separate plan change – not an add-on at this step in the process.
Reporting of Minor Amendments as Consequence of Revised NESAQ 2011
8. In August 2011, the Council delegated authority to the Group Manager Strategic Development for making amendments to the regional policy statement and regional plans as directed to do so by the Minister in a national policy statement and/or as a consequence of national environmental standards. These are amendments that can be made without using the usual Schedule 1 RMA process of submissions>hearings> decisions>appeals. In making that delegation, Council expected reporting of any amendments made under that authority.
9. Change 2 predates the NESAQ’s June 2011 revisions. Those revisions altered a number of elements including the timeline for compliance with the ambient PM10 standard. As a result, parts of Change 2 were inconsistent with the NESAQ and notations were added in order to identify the existence and effect of the revised NESAQ.
10. Amendments to Change 2 made under this delegated authority are identified in Attachment 1. Those amendments appear as ‘tracked changes’ and will be accepted before final publishing of operative Change 2 documentation. Similar amendments have also been made to Variation 2.
Financial and Resource Implications
11. Progressing Change 2 through to this stage has been provided for in Project 192. No additional external expenditure budget is required. Internal staff time is also already catered for within existing budgets.
Decision Making Process
12. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained in Part 6 Sub Part 1 of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded the following:
12.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset.
12.2. Consultation requirements for plan changes are set out in the Resource Management Act and have been followed for Change 2.
12.3. The decision does not fall within the definition of Council’s policy on significance.
12.4. The persons affected by this decision are the Hawke's Bay regional community.
12.5. Options that have been considered include to approve Change 2; not approve Change 2; and a selection of various possible operative dates.
12.6. The decision is not inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
12.7. Given the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided, and also the persons likely to be affected by, or have an interest in the decisions made, Council can exercise its discretion and make a decision without consulting directly with the community or others having an interest in the decision.
That Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. 2. Approves Plan Change 2 (Air Quality) to the Regional Resource Management Plan (as set out in Attachment 1) in accordance with Clause 17 Schedule 1 of RMA. 3. Agrees that Plan Change 2 (Air Quality) to the Regional Resource Management Plan becomes operative from 1 January 2012. 4. Receives the information reporting on amendments made by staff under delegated authority to Change 2 and Variation 2 so as to reference the revised 2011 National Environmental Standards for Air Quality. |
Belinda Riley Senior Planner |
Gavin Ide Team Leader Policy |
Helen Codlin Group Manager Strategic Development |
|
1View |
RRMP Plan Change 2 |
|
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Investment Company - Supplementary Paper on Governance
Reason for Report
1. At its meeting on 9 November 2011, the Corporate and Strategic Committee considered a report on the Establishment of the Investment Company.
2. As a result the Committee asked for a report back to Council on 23 November 2011 on “a process to determine the skill sets needed for either a Transition Board to oversee the progress on Waterco or the skill sets needed to set up Waterco as an independent company”.
3. This report responds to the Council’s requirements.
Background
4. The Ruataniwha Plains Water Harvesting Scheme feasibility study is expected to be completed by 30 June 2012, following which Council will consider whether to proceed further with the scheme and if so, on what terms it would do so.
5. Investigations into potential business strategies, business models, structures, financing options, investor interest and possible take up of the scheme by farmers and other possible users are also now underway.
6. It is expected that the management of the establishment phase of the Ruataniwha Plains Scheme will continue to be the responsibility of the Council now and later through its investment company (“HBRIC”), however, subject to final contracting it is anticipated that this feasibility assessment phase of Waterco will be co-funded by Council and Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF).
7. Waterco is expected to be established in partnership with external investors (e.g. farmers/irrigators/iwi/processors) if and when the project moves to construction of the dam(s) and other infrastructure, operating as a fully independent water harvesting, storage and distribution business.
Governance
8. The most effective way of directing and managing the establishment of the Ruataniwha Plains Scheme and its subsequent operation as a trading business is for:
8.1. HBRIC Board to oversee the establishment phase over the 2012-2014 period (including implementation of the outcomes of the feasibility study, managing all design engineering and consents issues and undertaking necessary negotiations and arrangements with external parties to set up and fund Waterco) - this transitional period for the investment company is considered prudent while considering whether the Ruataniwha Water Harvesting Scheme is feasible.
8.2. Should the scheme prove feasible, Waterco will be established as an independent company with its own Board and Council and external shareholders to fund and construct the dam, reservoir and distribution system over the 2015-2016 period and operate the business following completion of construction.
9. This approach ensures a clear line of Council leadership and management control of the project through to the point where external funding (from new investors and debt) is in place to enable construction of the Scheme infrastructure.
10. Creating two Boards running in parallel during establishment of the Scheme both of which are controlled by the Council – one for HBRIC and one for Waterco, complicates and duplicates a number of establishment functions (e.g. funding, development of corporate structures etc), potentially confuses responsibilities of entities and people involved, makes leadership less effective and increases administration costs.
Board Skill Sets
11. The following table summarises the roles and functions of the Council and the investment company and Waterco Boards, together with governance skill sets likely to be required respectively to establish, and eventually operate, the business of harvesting, storing and distributing water on the Ruataniwha Plains.
Controlling Bodies |
Governance Skill Sets Required |
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Role/functions: · Strategic Planning. · Setting Investment Objectives for the Investment Company. · Using investments to implement and progress Council strategies. · Appointing Board Members. · Performance monitoring. · Approving Investment Company Statement of Intent. |
|
Investment Company Role/functions: · Achievement of Council’s investment objectives. · Portfolio management. · Financial performance. · Funding strategies, including debt and equity funding. · Corporate structure management including establishment of subsidiaries, partnerships and co-investment. · Setting objectives for subsidiary companies and monitoring performance. · Nominating subsidiary company Board members for approval. · Developing a Statement of Intent. |
· Understanding and appreciation of Council’s strategic development objectives. · Understanding Council’s objectives for investment company and the company’s obligations to achieve them. · Corporate strategy development. · Use of corporate structures to achieve investment objectives. · Capital project financing and funding. · Financial strategy. · Logistical/infrastructure knowledge. · Knowledge of relevant markets. · Water storage/distribution/agribusiness connect.
|
Waterco Roles/functions: · Operating water harvesting, storage and distribution business. · Business development planning |
· Knowledge and experience in operating a trading business, especially in water harvesting, storage and distribution. · Marketing experience. · Financial management experience. · Strategic planning. |
12. Councillor Directors will ensure the Council’s requirements, (in terms of its strategic objectives, financial exposure limits, project risks and investment returns), and stakeholders views are well understood by the HBRIC Board. Their knowledge and experience of the region and statutory processes will be useful in guiding the Board’s approach to these elements of the Waterco project. At the same time they will ensure Council’s is well informed about the processes adopted and progress of the project.
Process for Further Refining Skill Sets if Required
13. Should the Council wish, this outline specification of skill sets could be expanded by undertaking a process to:
13.1. Further detail the key knowledge and experience required of HBRIC Board members to direct the establishment of the Ruataniwha Plains Scheme;
13.2. Peer review the resulting specification by an experienced independent Board member of a similar company; and,
13.3. Amend the specification where necessary as result of this review.
Timing
14. The following table indicates the expected timetable for the investment company to commence (around February 2012) under a Transitional Board, and subsequently move to full Board (at a date considered appropriate by Council), as well as the commencement of the Waterco Board (from January 2015).
Controlling Body |
Activity |
Commence |
Finish |
Investment Company |
Transition stage |
February 2012 |
Once full Board appointed |
Waterco |
Operations |
From January 2015 |
|
Decision Making Process
15. This paper provides information for Council that was requested by the Corporate and Strategic Committee at its meeting on 9 November 2011. This information is to assist Council in the adoption of the recommendations made by the Corporate and Strategic Committee.
1. That Council receives the information in this paper, as requested by the Corporate and Strategic Committee, with the intention to provide useful clarification to Council to assist with the adoption of the resolutions recommended by the Corporate and Strategic Committee at its meeting on 9 November 2011. |
Paul Drury Group Manager Corporate Services |
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
Wednesday 23 November 2011
SUBJECT: Recommendations from Corporate and Strategic Committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Corporate and Strategic Committee on Wednesday 09 November 2011 and are now presented to Council for consideration and approval.
Decision Making Process
2. These items have all been specifically considered at the Committee level.
The Corporate and Strategic Committee recommends that Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made, except where noted specifically, are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. Solar Hot Water Scheme 2. Agrees that the decision to be made is significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that any final decision on whether or not to proceed will be made after consideration of submissions through the 2012-22 Long Term Plan process. 3. Includes a proposal to fund a Solar Hot Water Scheme for public consultation in the Draft Long Term Plan 2012-22 4. Notes that Council agrees that 2) above is subject to the Hastings District Council and the Napier City Council agreeing to participate in the scheme as outlined in the “Solar Hot Water Joint Business Case for a Voluntary Targeted Rate Proposal”. Establishment of Investment Company 5. Approves, in principle, the adoption of a staged process for governance of the investment company, and brings back to Council on 23 November, a process to determine the skill sets needed for either a Transition Board to oversee the progress on WaterCo or the skill sets needed to set up WaterCo as an independent company. 6. Approves the appointment of three Councillors as members of the Transition Board of the investment company. 7. Approves the appointment of the Chief Executive of the Council as an ex officio member of the Transition Board of the investment company and its Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director, to be ratified at the Council Meeting on 23 November 2011. 8. Agrees to appoint three further independent persons who have appropriate skills and experience as members of the Transition Board of the investment company; such persons to be identified and nominated by the Chairman of the Council. 9. Notes that a paper to finalise matters covering investment company establishment, including the Council’s Statement of Objectives, the company’s Constitution and the transfer of assets will be submitted to a subsequent Council meeting.
Māori Constituencies 10. Exercises its discretion under Section 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Act, and makes a decision on this issue, having conferred directly with the Māori Committee and also due to the option available to the public to demand a poll under the Local Electoral Act should they choose to do so and can obtain the necessary number of signatures (5% of the electors). 11. Resolves to not establish Māori Constituencies, effectively maintaining the status quo for the 2013 Local Body Elections. 12. Instructs staff to publicly notify the electors of the Region of Council’s resolution (above) and their right to demand a poll on the matter under the Local Electoral Act should they choose to do so and can obtain the necessary number of signatures (5% of the electors). Local Government Funding Agency 13. Maintains the current process and methodology for funding of Council’s loan requirements, namely through a competitive process with major trading banks, noting that the continuation of the current process would not require any special consultative process or amendments to Council’s Investment and the Liability Management policies. Infrastructure Insurance 14. Advises LAPP of its intention to withdraw from the fund in accordance with the LAPP Trust Deed on 30 June 2013. 15. Instructs staff to undertake a further review of Council’s infrastructure asset insurance arrangements prior to 30 June 2013 and determine whether a more cost effective and secure arrangement is available. 16. Agrees that in the interim, the Regional Disaster Reserve account is grown through increases in investment value and the reinvestment of dividends to a maximum of $5.0M. Should the value of the fund exceed $5.0M, then surplus investments will be transferred to Council’s operating account, with the Chief Executive to decide what investments should be sold and the timing of any sale. Any such sale will be reported to Council. Webcasting of Council and Committee Meetings 17. Agrees that the decision to be made is significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that any final decision on whether or not to proceed will be made after consideration of submissions through the 2012-22 Long Term Plan process. 18. Includes the financial costs of webcasting Council and committee meetings in the Draft 2012-22 Long Term Plan for public consultation. 2012 Schedule of Council and Committee Meetings 19. Adopts the 2012 Schedule of Meetings as amended to reflect suggestions made at the 9 November 2011 meeting where appropriate. |
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Borrowing Facility Available to Fund Open Spaces/ Community Facilities Projects
Reason for Report
1. On 6 March 2008 Council resolved to establish a $7.5m borrowing facility for the purposes of funding projects identified in Council’s Open Space programme and also to fund capital projects of regional significance under the Community Facilities Fund criteria.
2. A number of projects have been approved by Council for funding under this facility. The purpose of this paper is to ask Council to consider obtaining further clarification from the submitters of the original projects as to what their current needs now are. This will allow Council to include any changes in the LTP 2012-22.
Comment
3. Set out in the table below is the status of the borrowing facility as at November 2011.
Details |
$ |
$ |
Total Approved Facility |
|
7,500,000 |
Loans already drawn down: |
|
|
- Open spaces (includes $1.5m for cycleway project) |
1,895,000 |
|
- Community facilities |
950,000 |
|
Total loans drawn |
|
2,845,000 |
Total funding not drawn |
|
4,655,000 |
Projects approved by Council that will require loan funding: |
|
|
- Hawke’s Bay Museum (2nd instalment) |
750,000 |
|
- Regional Sports Park |
1,600,000 |
|
- Wairoa (project to be identified) |
500,000 |
|
- Waimarama (9 June 2011) |
300,000 |
|
- Winery Ride (approved September 2011) |
590,000 |
|
|
|
3,740,000 |
Loan funding not drawn down or committed by Council resolution |
|
915,000 |
4. The projects included in the table above have been approved by Council where such projects either met the criteria as set down in the Open Space Investment policy or the Council’s Facility Fund policy.
5. The background on the projects to be funded from the Community Facilities Funds was included in the special consultative procedure for the LTCCP 2009-19. In November 2009 Council adopted the following recommendations from the Strategic Planning and Finance Committee:
5.1. Approves the payment in 2009/10 of $500,000 to the Central Hawke’s Bay District Council as a contribution to the cost of the Waipawa Town Hall, this project meeting Council’s approved policy for consideration of Community Facilities Fund applications.
5.2. Approves for the 2010/11 and 2011/12 financial years, the payment of $2.5m as a contribution to the Regional Sports Park (subject to the Velodrome proceeding), noting that this project meets Council’s approved policy for consideration of Community Facilities Fund applications. This approval is subject to a special consultative process being undertaken as part of the Annual Plan 2010/11 on the funding of this project from the Sale of Land (Non-Investment) account, as required by Council’s Investment Policy.
5.3. Approves for the 2010/11 and 2011/12 financial years, the payment of $2.5m as a contribution towards the Hawke’s Bay Museum and Art Gallery Project, noting that this project meets Council’s approved policy for consideration of Community Facilities Fund applications. This approval is subject to a special consultative process being undertaken as part of the Annual Plan 2010/11 on the funding of this project from the Sale of Land (Non-Investment) account, as required by Council’s Investment Policy.
5.4. Approves the assistance for the 2011 Rugby World Cup to be paid to Venture Hawke’s Bay, $100,000 in 2009/10 and $100,000 in 2010/11 from the Sale of Land (Non-Investment) account, noting that this project has been included in the LTCCP 2009/19 and that Council’s Investment Policy provides for payments from this fund of up to $300,000 without the need for the special consultative process.
6. At its meeting in December 2010 Council noted:
“Notes that Wairoa District Council has requested that if in the future they have a project, that Hawke’s Bay Regional Council would consider such an application in accordance with the adopted policy for the management of the Community Facilities Fund.”
7. In response to this request, Council set aside the sum of $500,000 in the 2012/13 year for such a project.
8. Staff are currently preparing budgets for the 2012/22 LTP and seek clarification from Council with regard to:
8.1. The use of funds for contributing to the costs of the Regional Sports Park (velodrome), and an unidentified project in Wairoa.
8.2. A review of the commitment to continue the fund following the repayment of loans.
8.3. A review of opportunities associated with Open Spaces for public access within the region as a resource for public enjoyment. This review would be undertaken over the next several months with a report brought back to Council for their consideration which would include:
8.3.1. A stocktake of all significant open space areas and facilities within the region (excluding urban parks and green areas, together with a review of their current use).
8.3.2. A review of the opportunities that these facilities and spaces provide, and an assessment of additional facilities or spaces that would enhance public enjoyment and tourism potential.
8.3.3. Recommendations for improving the use of current facilities and spaces, and linkages between these, that would provide for the opportunities identified.
Decision Making Process
9. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained in Part 6 Sub Part 1 of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded the following:
9.1. The decision does not significantly alter the service provision or affect a strategic asset.
9.2. The decision on some recommendations within this paper may fall within the definition of Council’s policy on significance. Where this is the case the decision of Council will be made in principle with the decision included within Council’s draft LTP 2012/22 for public consultation.
9.3. The persons affected by this decision are the public and businesses of Hawke’s Bay who would benefit, both directly and indirectly, from open space areas and facilities.
9.4. Options that have been considered are set out in this paper.
9.5. The decision is not inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
9.6. Given the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided, and also the persons likely to be affected by, or have an interest in the decisions made, Council can exercise its discretion and make a decision without consulting directly with the community or others having an interest in the decision.
That Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. 2. Delegates the Chairman to advise Hastings District Council and Wairoa District Council, in writing, of the provision for a contribution to projects within their districts and requests that they advise Council by 25 January 2012, of the specific projects that they propose to seek funding from HBRC, to enable Council to consider these requests at the LTP 2012-22 Workshop on 31 January 2012 and, if considered appropriate, to seek wider public comment on these projects through the draft LTP 2012/22. 3. Confirms that the fund is a borrowing facility of $7.5M, of which $2,845,000 has already been drawn from the fund, and a further $1,640,000 has been committed to further projects; leaving $3,015,000 of which $2,100,000 is currently set aside for Hastings District Council and Wairoa District Council projects. 4. Instructs staff to undertake a review of opportunities associated with Open Spaces for public access within the region as a resource for public enjoyment. The estimated cost of this review is $60,000 which is to be funded from the $7.5m borrowing facility. This review will be undertaken over the next several months with a report brought back to Council for their consideration, which would include: 4.1 A stocktake of all significant open space areas and facilities within the region (excluding urban parks and green areas, together with a review of their current use. 4.2 A review of the opportunities that these facilities and spaces provide, and an assessment of additional facilities or spaces that would enhance public enjoyment and tourism potential. 4.3 Recommendations for improving the use of current facilities and spaces, and linkages between these, that would provide for the opportunities identified. |
Mike Adye Group Manager Asset Management |
Paul Drury Group Manager Corporate Services |
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Recommendations From Asset Management and Biosecurity Meeting
Reason for Report
1. The following matters were considered by the Asset Management and Biosecurity Committee on Wednesday 17 August 2011 and are now presented to Council for approval.
Decision Making Process
2. These items have all been specifically considered at the Committee level.
Recommendations That Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance unless specifically stated otherwise, and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. Koupuawhara Flood Repairs 2. Approves the transfer of $54,000 from the Regional Disaster Fund to the Kopuawhara Scheme to meet the costs of damage repair following the April storm. 3. Agrees to the Scheme operating account going into deficit to meet the costs of improvement works necessary to retain the Scheme Level of Service. Asset Management Plans 4. Adopts the Upper Tukituki and Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme Asset Management Plans subject to changes being made associated with recommendations from Audit NZ. Proposed Regional Pest Management Strategy 5. Notes that Council’s current Regional Pest Management Strategy expires in December 2011, and agrees to the proposed review process and timeline as set out at the 16 November meeting. 6. Adopts the proposed reviewed Regional Pest Management Strategy 2011, including any amendments that they wish to make. 7. Approves the process and programme for the adoption, notification and submission on the Regional Pest Management Strategy as set out below. 7.1 Proposed RPMS adopted by Council and publicly notified 23 November 2011 7.2 Submissions on RPMS close 31 January 2012 7.3 HBRC hearings committee hear submissions on RPMS February 2012 Proposed Phytosanitary Pest Management Strategy 8. Agrees that Council complete the development of the Proposed Regional Phytosanitary Pest Management Strategy and the role of Council as management agency for the Strategy. 9. Adopts the proposed reviewed Regional Phytosanitary Pest Management Strategy 2011, including any amendments that they wish to make. 10. Approves the process and programme for the adoption, notification and submission on the Regional Phytosanitary Pest Management Strategy as set out below. 10.1 Proposed RPPMS adopted by Council and publicly notified 23 November 2011 10.2 Submissions on RPPMS close 31 January 2012 10.3 HBRC hearings committee hear submissions on RPPMS February 2012 Tomoana Road Drain - Surplus Land – Part Section 7 SO 4018 11. Agrees that the decision to be made is not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can make decisions on this issue as the Minister has conferred directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the issue to be considered and decided. 12. Declares surplus to requirements, the parcel of land which was acquired for the Tomoana Road Drain in Hastings being Section 1 Survey Office Plan 442998, with an area of 791m2. 13. Authorises the Chief Executive to undertake the sale process on behalf of Council. |
Mike Adye Group Manager Asset Management |
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
SUBJECT: Recommendations from the Environmental Management Committee
Reason for Report
1. The following matter was considered by the Environmental Management Committee at the meeting held on Wednesday 16 November 2011 and is now presented to Council for consideration and approval.
Decision Making Process
2. This item has been specifically considered at the Committee level.
Proposed Change 4 “Managing the Built Environment” That the Council: 1. Agrees that the decisions to be made are not significant under the criteria contained in Council’s adopted policy on significance and that Council can exercise its discretion under Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make decisions on this issue without conferring directly with the community and persons likely to be affected by or to have an interest in the decision because the Resource Management Act allows people to have an opportunity to submit on Change 4 following a decision by Council to publicly notify it. 2. Adopts the “Section 32 Evaluation Summary: Change 4 – Managing the Built Environment” (Attachment 1) and make it available for public inspection. 3. Adopts Change 4 to the Regional Resource Management Plan (Attachment 2) for public notification as amended at the Environmental Management Committee Meeting on 16 November 2011. 4. Agrees that a panel of commissioners be appointed to hear submissions on Change 4 and make recommendations back to the Council, with that panel’s composition being: 4.1 One representative to be nominated by Napier City Council 4.2 One representative to be nominated by Hastings District Council 4.3 Mr Mike Mohi (Chairman of HBRC Maori Committee and member of HBRC Hearing Committee, and 4.4 Councillor Scott (Panel Chair) and Councillor von Dadelszen (Panel Deputy Chair). |
Helen Codlin Group Manager Strategic Development |
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: Navigation Safety Bylaw Review
Reason for Report
1. The purpose of this report is:
1.1. To receive and consider the written submissions received on the Navigation Safety Bylaw Review
1.2. To recommend that Council adopt the draft Navigation Safety Bylaws as attached
1.3. To recommend that Council allocate $20,000 for the implementation of the bylaws from the Council contingency fund.
Discussion
2. Council has undertaken a special consultative process to review the Navigation Safety Bylaws. The review of the Bylaws was scheduled for 2012, however because a number of issues were either highlighted by or brought to the attention of staff it was considered necessary to bring the review forward twelve months.
Consultation Process
3. Initial consultation on the bylaws was undertaken with an invitation to comment sent to Honorary Boating Advisors, Commercial Fishing Companies, Marine retailers, Fishing Clubs, Sailing Club and a number of other clubs involved in water sports.
4. The first draft of the proposed bylaws was taken to the Environmental Management Committee (EMC) in June 2011 seeking permission to proceed with the review. Informal meetings were subsequently held at Wairoa, Clive and Napier in July.
5. A further draft taking account of feedback from informal consultation was prepared. A Summary of proposed changes and Statement of Proposal, being the proposed bylaws, was prepared for the EMC meeting in August when approval was given for the formal consultation process to proceed. The summary of proposed changes to the Bylaws is attached as Attachment 1.
6. Newspaper advertisements were run advising of the consultation process, and the Summary, Statement of Proposal and Submission form were made available on line, in public libraries and at HBRC office reception; with the submission period being 1 September to 15 October.
7. Formal public meetings were advertised and held in September at the Napier Sailing Club and the Rongomaraeroa Marae at Porangahau.
Consultation Outcomes
8. The meetings were very productive and have resulted in a small number of submissions on the proposal. Submissions received, together with the Harbourmaster’s recommendations is attached as Attachment 2, and a summary of submissions received, feedback from public meetings and staff comments is included as Attachment 3.
9. At the start of the Napier meeting there were questions and concerns regarding many of proposed changes. Most, if not all, were in relation to perceived interpretations rather the intent of the bylaw changes. The meeting was productive in that staff and the public identified and adopted potential wording that would not create unintended outcomes.
10. As a result of the meeting, staff drafted changes to the proposal that could be recommended to Council for approval when the bylaws were finalised. These changes were emailed to all meeting attendees. As a consequence, it appears all of the significant concerns were resolved, as only one person from that meeting submitted comments on the proposed bylaws.
11. The outcome of the Porangahau meeting was that a further visit to Porangahau was needed during daytime to assess the concerns and options put forward by the river users. The main area of concern is the location of the boat launching area to the area that is most popular for swimmers. Staff have since inspected the river site at high water with river users.
12. As a result of the consultation, staff are recommending amendments to Schedules S2.4 and S2.5. The proposed changes were emailed to everyone who had supplied an email address and were also subsequently passed on to other users at Porangahau.
13. This has been the most discussed area of the proposal, contributing the majority of submissions received.
14. Staff consider the bylaws as attached (Attachment 5), are the best compromise to allow two conflicting user groups to exist in close proximity while still having appropriate safety margins.
15. The final draft bylaws that have been prepared for Council are those that have been redrafted to take account of and respond to suggestions received in submissions and at public meetings.
16. There have been no requests to be heard in support of submissions.
Financial and Resource Implications
17. The financial implications of the recommendations proposed by staff are in the areas of:
17.1. reprinting signage
17.2. providing additional signage
17.3. reprinting bylaws and summary information books
17.4. reinstating the boat launching area downstream of the existing launching area on the Porangahau River
17.5. providing buoys to mark the swimming area on the Porangahau River
17.6. providing buoys to mark the area at Battery Road beach where boats are not allowed
17.7. adding additional 5 knots buoys along Hardinge Road.
18. These costs are attached in Attachment 4.
19. Staff have proposed the bylaws for the Porangahau River based in the assumption that the budgets above will be approved. If the budgets are not approved, Council should not adopt the bylaws as written. Staff will need to review the specific clauses to more appropriately manage the risk.
Decision Making Process
20. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with the requirements of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained in Part 6 Sub Part 1 of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded the following:
20.1. The decision does fall within the definition of Council’s policy on significance.
20.2. The use of the special consultative procedure undertaken during the bylaws review has fulfilled Council’s decision making obligations under the Local Government Act 2002.
20.3. The persons affected by this decision are the recreational and commercial boating community, as well as passive water users such as swimmers.
20.4. The decision is not inconsistent with an existing policy or plan.
That Council: 1. Agrees that the decision is to be made under sections 83 and 85 of the Local Government Act 2002 which includes consideration of submissions on the proposal from members of the community, and that this process has been undertaken. 2. Receives the public submissions and Officer comments as set out in Attachment 2. 3. Adopts the amended Navigations Safety Bylaws as attached in Attachment 3. 4. Agrees that these bylaws will come into effect on 15 December 2011. 5. Agrees that $20,000 shall be allocated from the contingency fund to give effect to the bylaws. |
Phil Norman Harbourmaster |
Bryce Lawrence Manager – Compliance and Harbours |
1View |
Summary of Draft Changes to the Bylaws Proposed |
|
|
2View |
Submissions Received and Staff Recommendations |
|
|
3View |
Summary of Submissions Received & Comments |
|
|
4View |
Quotes for Bylaws Upgrades |
|
|
5View |
Final Draft 2012 Navigation Safety Bylaws |
|
|
Attachment 1 |
FINAL DRAFT
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
HAWKE’S BAY NAVIGATION SAFETY BYLAWS 2012
Summary of proposed changes.
The following outlines the proposed changes resulting from public meetings and public submissions received. Harbourmaster’s comments are as outlined in separate table of submissions received.
Definitions
New definition of paddlecraft resulting from public meeting thereafter no submissions received
Clause 2.1-Personal Flotation Devices
2.1.2 Additional clause requiring PFD’s to be worn at all times on a craft of 6 metres or less and all paddlecraft when the craft is underway or preparing to become underway.
No submissions received.
Clause 2.6 – Vessels to be adequately moored
2.6.4 Additional clause requiring vessels moored at publicly accessible berths at West Quay and the Iron Pot, to secure the vessel’s moorings with a wire strop and padlock.
Word change resulting from public meeting thereafter no submissions received
Clause 2.7- Prohibited and restricted anchorages
2.7.3 and 2.7.4
Word change resulting from public meeting thereafter no submissions received
Clause 2.7.5 – new clause
Clause 2.9 – Notification of collisions or accidents
2.9.2 (d) (e) – new subclauses
Clause 2.12 – Visibilty of kayaks and paddle craft
2.12.1 Additional clause requiring every person operating a kayak or paddle craft of less than 7 metres, to take steps to enhance the kayak’s or paddle craft’s visibility to other vessels.
No submissions received but discussed and supported at public meeting.
Clause 2.13 – Identification of vessels
2.13.1 Additional clause requiring the owner and the master of a vessel to mark the vessel with name or similar identifying mark on each side of the vessel in characters a minimum of 90mm in height.
One submission questioned whether the height of the letters would clash with MNZ requirements. One submission suggested boat trailers be marked.
Clause 3.2 – Speed of vessels
3.2.8 Additional clause which validates Surf Lifesaving New Zealand vessels operating beyond the speeds specified in Clause 3.2 when undertaking rescue operations or an approved training programme.
No submissions received
Clause 3.8 – Reserved areas
3.8.1 Addition to this subclause to allow public notification to be by way of signs at all access points on a river where HBRC is undertaking hydrometric testing.
One submission received
Clause 3.10 – Conduct in reserved areas
3.10.2 – word change
Clause 3.13 – Duty of Master of vessel under 500 gross tonnage
3.13.1 Present clause is seen to conflict with 13.12.1 that requires vessels to operate in accordance with Maritime Rule Part 22 (Collision Prevention). Minor change that directs the Master not to impede the navigation of a vessel greater than 500 gross tonnage when that vessel is under the control of a pilot.
No submissions received
Clause 3.14 – Moving prohibited zone
3.14.1 and 3.14.2 – word change
3.14.3 New clause reinforcing 3.13.1, and advising Masters of vessels of greater than 500 gross tonnage that when navigating without a pilot on board they must comply with Maritime Rule Part 22 (Collision Prevention)
No submissions received
Clause 4.6 – Loading or discharge of cargo
Additional clause prohibiting the discharge of anything into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters that would or may constitute a danger to navigation safety. The clause also states that in the event of the above, the person responsible is liable for the cost of removal. The clause also requires any person handling logs in the Port of Napier to monitor operations and to track any log lost into the water until the log is retrieved. There is also a requirement to notify PONL Security and the Harbourmaster when a log is lost into the water and when the log is retrieved.
No submissions received
Clause 5.4.2 - deleted
Schedule S1.4 – Napier Pilotage Area
The schedule is amended to include the information presently shown in Schedule 3, and Schedule 3 is deleted.
Schedule 3 included the same map as Schedule 1.4 with only the Latitude and Longitude defining the area included. As stated above this information is now included in Schedule 1.4.
No submissions received
Schedule S1.5 – Westshore/Inner Harbour/Ahuriri/Battery Road Beach
S1.5 (i) An additional subclause, introduced with the intent of protecting swimmers at Napier City’s only easily accessible sandy beach. The status quo will only be affected in that motorised vessels will be prohibited from entering the popular swimming area, but still able to launch from the adjacent boat ramp.
Name change to Battery Road Beach resulting from public consultation.
Schedule S1.6 – Breakwater Harbour
Additional Schedule that removes the requirements for operations within the
Breakwater Harbour from Schedule 1.4, Napier Pilotage Area.
No submissions received.
Schedule S2.3
Areas C & D –
word change redefining these areas resulting from public meeting thereafter no submissions received
Schedule S2.4 – Porangahau River
S2.4 (a) –
word change to uplift speed restriction overall resulting from public consultation.
S2.4 (b) –
word change to redefine bathing area resulting from public consultation.
S2.4 (c) (d) (e) –
new subclauses resulting from public consultation
9 submissions received
Schedule S2.5 – Te Paerahi Beach
Word change resulting from public consultation
7 submissions received
Schedule 3 – Oil Transfers
The present Schedule 3 is deleted and becomes new Schedule replacing the present Schedule 4 – Bunkering.
Schedule 4 is incorrect and is replaced by a schedule that accurately reflects permitted bulk oil discharge operations in the PONL and Inner Harbour.
An advice note has been included to emphasise the importance of adherence to Tier 1, Site Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plans, as required by Marine Protection Rules Part 130B.
No submissions received
Schedule 4- Hot Work Permit
Schedule 4 becomes Hot Work Permit resulting from deletion of present Schedule 3.
Attachment 2 |
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: 2.13 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Mahia Boating & Fishing Club/ Stan Jones - Mahia |
Issues Requiring Response: Would like to see all boat trailers marked in a legible way identifying the name of the boat. Considers this will help with SAR operations
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Agree with proposal
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Mahia Boating & Fishing Club/ Stan Jones - Mahia and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedule S2.3 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Bernie Kelly - Clive |
Issues Requiring Response:
Comment on behaviour on Clive River and apparent lack of policing.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: No submission made, however monitoring programme may improve behaviour on Clive River.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Bernie Kelly and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedule S2.4 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Don Stevenson - Porangahau |
Issues Requiring Response:
Supports S2.4 (a) (b) (c) (d) with some site specific amendments.
Opposes the uplifting of speed limits under bridge.
Requests that the swimming area include the jetty and extends 100 metres upstream of the bridge.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Speed restrictions to be uplifted in order that water skiers may proceed to a part of the river that is wide enough for a safe turn to be executed. Common practice has been for this to happen in contravention of bylaw and signage on bridge.
The proposed bathing area already encompasses the jetty. Agree with request that bathing area extend 100 metres upstream.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Don Stevenson and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: John Pothan - Porangahau |
Issues Requiring Response:
S2.4 - States that public meeting on 20 September 2011 agreed to a 5 knot area 50 metres up and 50 metres down the river.
S2.5 - States that meeting agreed to an area 200 metres wide at Te Paerahi beach to be vessel excluded.
Requests that these agreements be upheld.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: There were no final decisions made at the public meeting. The meeting agreed that the Harbourmaster should revisit the sites and after extensive consultation a date and time for the visit was agreed; this was undertaken on Friday 30 September.
Taking into account all advice received the recommendation to Council is as outlined in the final draft of the bylaws.
The 200 metre exclusion zone at Te Paerahi Beach was adjusted slightly, from that first proposed, with agreement of those present and the added condition in respect of vehicle speed on the beach.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from John Pothan and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Maureen Pothan – Porangahau |
Issues Requiring Response:
Speed restriction 50 metres up and down stream of the bridge to be 5 knots and to be across the whole width of the river.
Designated mixed bathing and surfing area 200 metres wide and out to sea in front of changing sheds.
Requests that agreement reached at public meeting of 20 September be adhered to.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: There were no final decisions made at the public meeting. The meeting agreed that the Harbourmaster should revisit the sites and after extensive consultation a date and time for the visit was agreed; this was undertaken on Friday 30 September.
Taking into account all advice received the recommendation to Council is as outlined in the final draft of the bylaws.
The purpose of the Harbourmaster revisiting Porangahau was to see for himself how the discussion at the public meeting related to the river at low water and further discuss alternatives at Te Paerahi Beach.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Maureen Pothan and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: 2.13.1 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Hawke’s Bay Sports Fishing Club/Wayne Bicknell |
Issues Requiring Response:
States that MNZ Safe Ship Management requires boats under 6 metres to be marked with MSA numbers both sides minimum 75 mm high. This would mean that a vessel in SSM would not comply with 2.13.1 requirement of 90mm.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Unable to find reference to 75 mm in Maritime Rules, and recommend that 90mm proposal remain.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Hawke’s Bay Sports Fishing Club/Wayne Bicknell and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Charles Michael Whelch Nesbitt/Mick - Porangahau |
Issues Requiring Response:
Supports S2.4 (a) (b) (c) (e).
Suggests that S2.4 (d) include any vessel not towing a skier.
Suggests that this would ensure no joyriding through and upstream of the bridge.
Supports S2.5
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Support suggestion as the intent of S2.4 (d) is simply to afford a safe turning area for skiers.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Charles Michael Whelch Nesbitt and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Margaret Rosiamund Marshall - Wellington |
Issues Requiring Response:
Qualified support for amended proposal. See no reason why restrictions on boat use should be introduced.
Observes that the interests of boat users and swimmers have been accommodated satisfactorily until now without the need for restrictions. Unaware of any of any widespread discontent.
Suggests that if a track was developed this may encourage swimming upstream of the bridge away from the boat launching area.
Presumes that jet ski towing a water skier will be permitted same use as boat. If restrictions imposed they should not be more restrictive on boats and skiers than that proposed in amended bylaw. Restrictions should not apply when no swimmers in water.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Supports submission of Mick Nesbitt as above.
When swimming area permanently marked not practical to remove restrictions when no one swimming. Do not consider that defined swimming area will have any impact on boat users or skiers should the proposal to reconstruct the launching area be accepted.
Support investigation into developing a track for access upstream of bridge.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Margaret Rosiamund Marshall and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Quentin Hooper Smith- Dannevirke |
Issues Requiring Response:
Supports S2.4, however suggests that it be made clear that only vessels towing skiers or boarders can exceed 5 knots through centre of bridge and upstream. Boats without skiers must stay downstream.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Support suggestion.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Quentin Hooper Smith and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Hamish B deLautour - Waipukurau |
Issues Requiring Response:
Supports proposal that allows for swimming area and also allows for water ski lane which specifically allows for transition under bridge.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: No comment
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Hamish B deLautour and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Mary Wilson – Palmerston North |
Issues Requiring Response:
Supports S2.4 (a) and (c) in part, in that supports skiers passing through centre bridge span, but does not support skiers having due regard for bathers at all times.
Opposes S2.4 (b) (d) (e). States that the present access is for boats only. Would like to see swimmers shifted to the other side of the river and boats prohibited from travelling on that side. States that it is dangerous for swimmers and children to play on the north side. Sees no reason for swimmers to have preference over boaters, especially when there could be an alternative site for the swimmers.
Supports S2.5
Comment and Proposals by Staff: Disagree in total with submission on S 2.4. The purpose of the proposal is to create a safe environment that takes into account increasing number of people using the river for recreation. There has been no previous suggestion that the launch area is exclusive to boats and a reconstructed launch area would adequately cater for boats.
Not a feasible proposal to move swimmers to other side of river.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Mary Wilson and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012
Submissions
Clause: Schedules S2.4 & S2.5 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Chris Day - Wellington |
Issues Requiring Response:
States that although river is extensively used by boats and jet skis it is only practical to use 2 hours each side of high water, and boats and jet skis rely on being able to launch near the jetty and use the jetty to take on and offload passengers. Contends that it is very important for boats/jet skis to be able to use the jetty for starting and ending rides as downstream the northerly bank is approximately 2 metres high and there is extremely thick mud at the river edge. It is impractical to get out and in the water via the north bank, as footwear gets stuck and lost, it’s extremely dirty and unpleasant to use and not practical for children to safely navigate. For these reasons the jetty is very important to use for launching and exiting the water for boats and jet skis. Expresses concern that if the launching ramp is reconstructed downstream of the jetty there will be a crossover of boats and jet skis being launched at the same time as people using the jetty. Considers this less safe and would prefer the jetty remains downstream of the boat launch ramp. Comments that there would be less area for backing trailers if the launching ramp is shifted. States that the current arrangements already work well for power craft users, however concedes that it is also reasonable that swimmers have a safe area.
Proposes that:
· Existing jetty is moved 20-30 metres downstream and is improved to make it safer and easier to use.
· Existing launching ramp is also moved 20-30 metres downstream but remains upstream of the ramp.
· Swimming area extend from 30 metres downstream of the bridge to 50 metres upstream and out to the second bridge pier.
· Powered craft continue to go under the bridge having due regard for swimmers.
· Any changes made need to be clearly marked in river with buoys and that there be a visible presence to assist users to understand the changes and remind them of the rules.
· States that if changes are made HBDC has a responsibility to make the necessary investment in the jetty, boat ramp, buoys signage and oversight to ensure bylaws are adequately supported in practice.
Supports S2.5. Observes that the changing sheds are north of the main route for vehicles entering and leaving the beach. Ensuring compliance with 5k speed restriction presents an issue of how this will be enforced. Also observes that this speed restriction may make beach users less traffic aware. States it would be good if traffic could enter the beach north of the vehicle free zone.
Comment and Proposals by Staff: This is the only submission that has stated it is important for boats and skiers to have use of the jetty. There is a plan to refurbish the jetty as a community project with donated timber. The reconstructed launching ramp would remain in close proximity to the existing launch area and would not change the backing area for trailers. It is not intended that access is undertaken in the high bank area but from the clean area of the reconstructed launching ramp.
If the jetty and launching ramp were to be moved this would encroach into the area of the culvert and high bank and would require considerable investment in cash and resources.
It is intended to clearly mark the swimming area with posts or buoys should the proposal be accepted and subject to an engineers report on the practicality of this. Council’s investment in marking the swimming area would be in providing and installing buoys and/or a pile and rope.
A community project is accepting responsibility for refurbishing the jetty. Council’s investment in the reconstructed launching ramp would be provision of old power poles for the ramp base and metal for the ramp surface as the community has the equipment and the willingness to undertake the re-construction. New signage is planned throughout Hawke’s Bay to account for the updated bylaws. Monitoring is yet to be detetrmined, however Honorary Boat Advisors in the Porangahau area would greatly assist in this. As yet there have been no applications as a result of the invitation extended at the public meeting.
S2.5 The proposed 5k speed restriction is dependent upon MoT acceptance. A launching ramp exists at Makaramu Crescent which is clear of the vessel excluded area. Harbourmaster to liase with CHBDC with a view to installing signage and keeping access clear.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Chris Day and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: 2.1; 2.12;2.13 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Alex Smith - Napier |
Issues Requiring Response: States: Council should not accept that a perceived outcome from a coroner’s inquest is any reason to create bylaws that should be seen as generic throughout NZ.
States: MNZ is tasked with maritime safety ... HBRC has stated that MNZ do not do enough in terms of safety rules. Has seen no evidence to indicate that HBRC has indeed aggressively lobbied central government on this issue e.g. no representation made to local MP.
States: Organisations such as MNZ and Coastguard have policies that “educate rather than legislate”. It would appear HBRC has the reverse policy. Statistics would show most craft that cause concern do not belong to any club or organisation so therefore are not “educated”.
States: The more rules the greater the need for compliance.
Reduce your budget don’t increase!!
Comment and Proposals by Staff: The submitter has misunderstood the reference made, at the Napier public meeting, to the coroner’s report. The coroner’s report was published after the bylaws were reviewed and the reference made was that the report supported a lot of the proposed changes to the bylaws.
I have no recollection of a statement in relation to MNZ not doing enough in terms of safety rules. HBRC is tasked with overseeing navigation safety in Hawke’s Bay waters and the proposed bylaws were sent to MNZ for comment. No submission was received from MNZ nor from Coastguard..
HBRC works closely with Coastguard and MNZ in educating the boating public and this will continue throughout the coming summer season.
Acknowledge that clubs play a pivotal role in education and in an ideal world every boatie would belong to a responsible club.
No comment on budget.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Alex Smith and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: 3.2; 3.8 & Schedule S2.7 |
Verbal: No |
Name of Submitter: Hawke’s Bay Regional Council – Lawrence Kees |
Issues Requiring Response:
Clause 3.2: Requests that clause 3.2.1 be amended to allow vessels operated by and under contract to HBRC to operate above the 5 knot speed restriction on all Hawke’s Bay rivers.
States: Jet boats are the best option for the hydrometric survey work that needs to be undertaken by the hydrology department of HBRC. Variations in the depth of river channels and hidden or submerged hazards increase the risk of damaging propeller driven vessels. The ability to navigate shallow and fast moving sections in a river is a distinct advantage of a jet boat; however this will more often than not require speeds in excess of 5 knots.
States in respect of clause 3.8.3: Surveys will be required at multiple locations within and across catchments and that the event specific nature of events means that there will be little opportunity to provide public notice as to when and where hydrometric surveys will occur. Therefore any bylaw change must allow for an immediate response with minimal public warning to any such hydrologic event. Requests that HBRC provide warning of activity at point of boat launching if in a public space, rather than on land at the extremities of the area.
Schedule 2: S2.7 (a): Seeks amendment to clause to allow vessel undertaking hydrometric survey to repeatedly cross from side to side, so long as Schedule S2.7 (b) is not contravened.
S2.7 (c): Requests that this clause is amended to stipulate that safety is to be jointly determined by the skipper and crew of the HBRC contracted or owned vessel on a river. Decision to not go on a river may be determined by either crew or skipper with any decision not to embark/launch /undertake work overriding any decision to go on any water body.
Comment and Proposals by Staff:
Clause 3.2.1: Agree that jet boats are the best platform on which to undertake surveys. However do not agree that there is a necessity to uplift speed restrictions as the sole reasoning behind using a jet boat is to avoid damage to propeller driven vessels. Jet boats are used in many areas throughout NZ to undertake surveys, for example by DOC, and when doing so are operated at less than planning speeds and within the rules.
Clause 3.8.1: I consider that clause 3.8.1 should be amended to include signage as a means of advising of a reserved area and in doing so satisfy the public notification requirement; there is no period for public notification specified in this clause.
Clause 3.8.1 to read:
The Council, on application or of its own mind... Such notification may for the purpose of hydrometric surveys conducted by HBRC consist of signs erected at all access points on the length of river to be surveyed.
Clause 3.8.3: The hydrology department should design signage that advises of surveys being undertaken in the length of the river without specifying a period of duration. Simply removing such signage will be sufficient to indicate the survey has been completed. I consider that signs warning of activity should be displayed at all possible points of boat launching within the area where a survey is to be undertaken.
Schedule 2-
S2.7 (a): The fact that a boat is crossing the river from side to side should be included on the signage as suggested above.
S2.7 (c): This is not a matter for inclusion in the bylaws but should be covered in a COP and included in training for a Boat Operator’s Permit.
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from Hawke’s Bay Regional Council – Lawrence Kees and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Draft Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012 Submissions
Clause: Definitions; 2.1.2; 2.3.2 (c); 2.6.4; 2.7.3; 2.7.4; 2.7.5; 2.12.2; 2.13; 2.13.1; 2.13.2; 3.2.8; 4.6.2; 4.6.3; 4.6.4; Schedule 1-Map1.5; Schedule S1.6; Schedule 1-Map1.7; Schedule S2.4 |
|
|||
Verbal: No |
|
|||
Name of Submitter: Submissions received at Napier public meeting. |
|
|||
Clause |
Version 1 Bylaw wording |
Submissions & Comments |
|
|
Definitions |
Not defined |
Paddle craft- Any ship, vessel or craft that is wholly propelled using paddles or oars. This includes but is not limited to kayaks, canoes, dinghies, waka ama, and surf skis. |
|
|
2.1.2 |
craft |
No change proposed |
|
|
2.3.2 (c) |
notify the Harbourmaster and PONL Security prior to the engines being tested. |
notify the Harbourmaster and Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security prior to the engines being tested. |
|
|
2.6.4 |
The owner or master of an unattended vessel berthed at West Quay or the Iron Pot, at berths accessible to the public, must ensure the vessel’s moorings are secured utilising a wire strop and padlock acceptable to the Harbourmaster or Enforcement Officer, to prevent the release of mooring lines by unauthorised persons.
|
The owner or master of an unattended vessel berthed at West Quay or the Iron Pot, which are accessible to the public, must ensure the vessel’s moorings are secured utilising a wire strop, or wire strop equivalent but not a chain, and padlock, code MS153, acceptable to the Harbourmaster or Enforcement Officer, to prevent the release of mooring lines by unauthorised persons. |
|
|
2.7.3 |
No person shall anchor any vessel in the areas shown on maps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 1.9 and 2.3 listed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster.
|
No person shall anchor any vessel in the shaded areas shown on maps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 1.9 and 2.3 listed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster. |
|
|
2.7.4 |
No person shall anchor any vessel, so as to impede the safe passage of any other vessel, having particular regard for the Approach Channels as defined on map 1.7 and Chart NZ 5612.
|
No person shall anchor any vessel, so as to impede the safe passage of any other vessel which cannot deviate from its course because of constraints of draft and/or manoeuvrability. |
|
|
|
||||
2.7.5 |
No clause |
Clause 2.7.3 shall not apply to dinghy sailing support vessels when temporarily anchored between Pandora Bridge and Napier City Council Meeanee finger wharf No. 1. |
|
|
2.12.2 |
No clause |
Clause 2.12.1 shall not apply to a tender used solely for accessing a moored vessel, where access does not cross a main channel as shown on Map 1.5. |
|
|
|
||||
2.13 |
2.14.1 and 2.14.2 |
2.13.1 and 2.13.2 |
|
|
2.13.1 |
2.14.1 The master and owner of a vessel shall ensure the vessel is marked with its name or similar identifying marks. This shall be displayed, on each side of the vessel. The number or name shall be a minimum height of 90 millimetres and each character shall be legible. |
Change reference to 2.14.1 to become 2.13.1. |
|
|
2.13.2 |
Clause 2.14.1 shall not apply to non-mechanically powered vessels of less than 6 metres in length. Such vessels should be marked with a name, or the owners name or contact details somewhere on the vessel. |
Clause 2.13.1 shall not apply to non-mechanically powered vessels of less than 6 metres in length. Such vessels should be marked with a number or name, or the owners name or contact details somewhere on the vessel’s hull.. |
|
|
3.2.8 |
Clauses 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 shall not apply to a rescue craft operated by members of Surf Lifesaving New Zealand, while undertaking rescue operations or while it is being operated under supervision in accordance with an inflatable rescue boat training programme approved by the Director of Maritime New Zealand.
|
Clauses 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 shall not apply to a rescue craft operated by members of Surf Lifesaving New Zealand or Hawke’s Bay Coastguard, while undertaking rescue operations or while it is being operated under supervision in accordance with an inflatable rescue boat training programme approved by the Director of Maritime New Zealand or a Coastguard training programme.
|
|
|
4.6.2 |
Any person who discharges, drops, causes or allows to be discharged, any cargo or any other material into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters shall be liable for the cost of removal.
|
Any person who discharges, drops, causes or allows to be discharged, any cargo or any other material into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters that would or may constitute a danger to navigation safety shall be liable for the cost of removal.
|
|
|
4.6.3; 4.6.4 |
PONL Breakwater Harbour |
Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour and Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security |
|
|
Schedule1-Map 1.5 |
No wording |
Make Map 1.5 a full page to better show channels. |
|
|
Schedule S1.6 |
SANDY BAY-HARDINGE ROAD The area designated in Sandy Bay as shown on map 1.6 is reserved for swimming only. Motorised vessels are not permitted to enter the area between the buoys and the shore at any time, unless authorised by the Harbourmaster or an Enforcement officer.
|
BATTERY ROAD BEACH The area designated inside the buoys at Battery Road Beach, as shown on map 1.6, is reserved for swimming only. Motorised vessels are not permitted to enter the area between the buoys and the shore at any time, unless authorised by the Harbourmaster or an Enforcement officer.
Change label of map 1.6 to “BATTERY ROAD BEACH”. |
|
|
Schedule 1 Map 1.7 |
No wording |
Make Map 1.7 a full page to better show channels. |
|
|
Schedule S2.4 (d) |
The area from 400 meters upstream to 100 metres downstream of the Beach Rd... |
The area from 400 metres upstream to 100 metres downstream of the Beach Rd. |
|
|
Recommendation:
That Council considers the submission from the Napier public meeting and any comments and proposals made by staff.
Attachment 3 |
Submitter/Contact |
Bylaw section |
Submission |
Harbourmaster’s Comments |
Wish to be heard/ Joint case |
Mahia Boating & Fishing Club/ Stan Jones - Mahia |
cl 2.13 |
Would like to see all boat trailers marked in a legible way identifying the name of the boat. Considers this will help with SAR operations |
Agree with proposal. This system is already in use with fishing clubs and is part of a Coastguard boat check prior to fishing contests. However staff consider that this needs wider public consultation to demonstrate that the concept has community support. |
No/ |
Bernie Kelly - Clive |
Schedule S2.3 |
Comment on behaviour on Clive River and apparent lack of policing |
No submission made, however monitoring programme may improve behaviour on Clive river. |
No |
Don Stevenson - Porangahau |
Schedule S2.4 |
Supports S2.4 (a) (b) (c) (d) with some site specific amendments. Opposes the uplifting of speed limits under bridge. Requests that the swimming area include the jetty and extends 100 metres upstream of the bridge. |
Speed restrictions to be uplifted in order that water skiers may proceed to a part of the river that is wide enough for a safe turn to be executed. Common practice has been for this to happen in contravention of bylaw and signage on bridge. The proposed bathing area already encompasses the jetty. Proposed swimming area extends 50 metres upstream, however this may be extended further dependent upon access. |
No/Yes |
John Pothan - Porangahau |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
S2.4 - States that public meeting on 20 September 2011 agreed to a 5 knot area 50 metres up and 50 metres down the river. S2.5 - Also states that meeting agreed to an area 200 metres wide at Te Paerahi beach to be vessel excluded. Requests that these agreements be upheld. |
There were no final decisions made at the public meeting. The meeting agreed that the Harbourmaster should revisit the sites and after extensive consultation a date and time for the visit was agreed; this was undertaken on Friday 30 September. Taking into account all advice received the recommendation to Council is as outlined in the final draft of the bylaws. The 200 metre exclusion zone at Te Paerahi Beach was adjusted slightly, from that first proposed, with agreement of those present and the added condition in respect of vehicle speed on the beach. |
No/No |
Maureen Pothan – Porangahau |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
As above together with copy of minutes of meeting. Requests that Council adhere to proposed changes agreed at this meeting. |
As above. The purpose of the Harbourmaster revisiting Porangahau was to see for himself how the discussion at the public meeting related to the river at low water and further discuss alternatives at Te Paerahi Beach. |
No/No |
Hawke’s Bay Sports Fishing Club/Wayne Bicknell - Napier |
cl 2.13.1 |
States that MNZ Safe Ship Management requires boats under 6 metres to be marked with MSA numbers both sides minimum 75 mm high. This would mean that a vessel in SSM would not comply with 2.13.1 requirement of 90mm. |
Maritime Rules make reference to 75mm only in respect of a ship’s MNZ No. The height of ships name is stipulated in the Ship Registration Act Part 19 and is 100mm, therefore there is no clash. |
Not stated |
Napier City Council/Warren Burch |
cl 2.6.4 |
Does not wish to make a submission, however seeks assurance that clause 2.6.4 will not apply to NCC berths that require key access through security gates. |
Letter sent advising that clause 2.6.4 only applied to berths that were accessible by public. |
No |
Charles Michael Whelch Nesbitt/Mick - Porangahau |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
In support of S2.4 (a) (b) (c) (e). Suggests that S2.4 (d) include any vessel not towing a skier. Suggests that this would ensure no joyriding through and upstream of the bridge. Supports S2.5 |
Support suggestion as the intent of S2.4 (d) is simply to afford a safe turning area for skiers. |
Not stated /Yes |
Margaret Rosiamund Marshall - Wellington |
Schedule S2.4 |
Qualified support for amended proposal. See no reason why restrictions on boat use should be introduced. Observes that the interests of boat users and swimmers have been accommodated satisfactorily until now without the need for restrictions. Unaware of any of any widespread discontent. Suggests that if a track was developed this may encourage swimming upstream of the bridge away from the boat launching area. Presumes that jet ski towing a water skier will be permitted same use as boat. If restrictions imposed they should not be more restrictive on boats and skiers than that proposed in amended bylaw. Restrictions should not apply when no swimmers in water. |
Supports submission of Mick Nesbitt as above. When swimming area permanently marked not practical to remove restrictions when no one swimming. Do not consider that defined swimming area will have any impact on boat users or skiers should the proposal to reinstate the launching area be accepted. Support investigation into developing a track for access upstream of bridge. |
No/Yes |
Quentin Hooper Smith- Dannevirke |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
Supports S2.4, suggests that it be made clear that only vessels towing skiers or boarders can exceed 5 knots through centre of bridge and upstream. Boats without skiers must stay downstream. |
Support suggestion. |
No/No |
Hamish B deLautour - Waipukurau |
Schedule S2.4 & 2.5 |
Supports proposal that allows for swimming area and also allows for water ski lane which specifically allows for transition under bridge. |
No comment |
Not stated |
Mary Wilson – Palmerston North |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
Supports S2.4 (a) and (c) in part, in that supports skiers passing through centre bridge span, but does not support skiers having due regard for bathers at all times. Opposes S2.4 (b) (d) (e). States that the present access is for boats only. Would like to see swimmers shifted to the other side of the river and boats prohibited from travelling on that side. States that it is dangerous for swimmers and children to play on the north side. Sees no reason for swimmers to have preference over boaters, especially when there could be an alternative site for the swimmers. Supports S2.5 |
Disagree in total with submission on S 2.4. The purpose of the proposal is to create a safe environment that takes into account increasing number of people using the river for recreation. There has been no previous suggestion that the launch area is exclusive to boats and a reinstated launch area would adequately cater for boats. Not a feasible proposal to move swimmers to other side of river. |
No/No |
Chris Day - Wellington |
Schedule S2.4 & S2.5 |
States that although river is extensively used by boats and jet skis it is only practical to use 2 hours each side of high water, and boats and jet skis rely on being able to launch near the jetty and use the jetty to take on and offload passengers. Contends that it is very important for boats/jet skis to be able to use the jetty for starting and ending rides as downstream the northerly bank is approximately 2 metres high and there is extremely thick mud at the river edge. It is impractical to get out and in the water via the north bank, as footwear gets stuck and lost, it’s extremely dirty and unpleasant to use and not practical for children to safely navigate. For these reasons the jetty is very important to use for launching and exiting the water for boats and jet skis. Expresses concern that if the launching ramp is reinstated downstream of the jetty there will be a crossover of boats and jet skis being launched at the same time as people using the jetty. Considers this less safe and would prefer the jetty remains downstream of the boat launch ramp. Comments that there would be less area for backing trailers if the launching ramp is shifted. States that the current arrangements already work well for power craft users, however concedes that it is also reasonable that swimmers have a safe area. Proposes that: · Existing jetty is moved 20-30 metres downstream and is improved to make it safer and easier to use. · Existing launching ramp is also moved 20-30 metres downstream but remains upstream of the ramp. · Swimming area extend from 30 metres downstream of the bridge to 50 metres upstream and out to the second bridge pier. · Powered craft continue to go under the bridge having due regard for swimmers. · Any changes made need to be clearly marked in river with buoys and that there be a visible presence to assist users to understand the changes and remind them of the rules. · States that if changes are made HBDC has a responsibility to make the necessary investment in the jetty, boat ramp, buoys signage and oversight to ensure bylaws are adequately supported in practice. Supports S2.5. Observes that the changing sheds are north of the main route for vehicles entering and leaving the beach. Ensuring compliance with 5k speed restriction presents an issue of how this will be enforced. Also observes that this speed restriction may make beach users less traffic aware. States it would be good if traffic could enter the beach north of the vehicle free zone. |
This is the only submission that has stated it is important for boats and skiers to have use of the jetty. There is a plan to refurbish the jetty as a community project with donated timber. The reinstated launching ramp would remain in close proximity to the old launch area and would not change the backing area for trailers. It is not intended that access is undertaken in the high bank area but from the clean area of the reinstated launching ramp. If the jetty and launching ramp were to be moved this would encroach into the area of the culvert and high bank and would require considerable investment in cash and resources. It is intended to clearly mark the swimming area with posts or buoys should the proposal be accepted and subject to an engineers report on the practicality of this. Council’s investment in marking the swimming area would be in providing and installing buoys and/or a pile and rope. A community project is accepting responsibility for refurbishing the jetty. Council’s investment in the reinstated launching ramp would be provision of old power poles for the ramp base and metal for the ramp surface as the community has the equipment and the willingness to undertake the reinstatement. New signage is planned throughout Hawke’s Bay to account for the updated bylaws. Monitoring is yet to be determined, however Honorary Boat Advisors in the Porangahau area would greatly assist in this. As yet there have been no applications as a result of the invitation extended at the public meeting.
S2.5 The proposed 5k speed restriction is dependent upon MoT acceptance. A launching ramp exists at Makaramu Crescent which is clear of the vessel excluded area. Harbourmaster to liase with CHBDC with a view to installing signage and keeping access clear. |
No/Yes |
Alex Smith - Napier |
cl 2.1; 2.12;2.13 |
States: Council should not accept that a perceived outcome from a coroner’s inquest is any reason to create bylaws that should be seen as generic throughout NZ. States: MNZ is tasked with maritime safety ... HBRC has stated that MNZ do not do enough in terms of safety rules. Has seen no evidence to indicate that HBRC has indeed aggressively lobbied central government on this issue e.g. no representation made to local MP. States: Organisations such as MNZ and Coastguard have policies that “educate rather than legislate”. It would appear HBRC has the reverse policy. Statistics would show most craft that cause concern do not belong to any club or organisation so therefore are not “educated”. States: The more rules the greater the need for compliance. Reduce your budget don’t increase!! |
The submitter has misunderstood the reference made, at the Napier public meeting, to the coroner’s report. The coroner’s report was published after the bylaws were reviewed and the reference made was that the report supported a lot of the proposed changes to the bylaws. Staff have no recollection of a statement in relation to MNZ not doing enough in terms of safety rules. HBRC is mandated in law to manage local navigation safety in Hawke’s Bay waters and the proposed bylaws were sent to MNZ for comment. No submission was received from MNZ nor from Coastguard.. HBRC works closely with Coastguard and MNZ in educating the boating public and this will continue throughout the coming summer season. Acknowledge that clubs play a pivotal role in education and in an ideal world every boatie would belong to a responsible club. No comment on budget. |
Not stated |
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council – Lawrence Kees |
cl 3.2; 3.8 & Schedule S2.7 |
Clause 3.2: Requests that clause 3.2.1 be amended to allow vessels operated by and under contract to HBRC to operate above the 5 knot speed restriction on all Hawke’s Bay rivers. States: Jet boats are the best option for the hydrometric survey work that needs to be undertaken by the hydrology department of HBRC. Variations in the depth of river channels and hidden or submerged hazards increase the risk of damaging propeller driven vessels. The ability to navigate shallow and fast moving sections in a river is a distinct advantage of a jet boat; however this will more often than not require speeds in excess of 5 knots. Clause 3.8: States in respect of clause 3.8.3: Surveys will be required at multiple locations within and across catchments and that the event specific nature of events means that there will be little opportunity to provide public notice as to when and where hydrometric surveys will occur. Therefore any bylaw change must allow for an immediate response with minimal public warning to any such hydrologic event. Requests that HBRC provide warning of activity at point of boat launching if in a public space, rather than on land at the extremities of the area.
Schedule 2: S2.7 (a): Seeks amendment to clause to allow vessel undertaking hydrometric survey to repeatedly cross from side to side, so long as Schedule S2.7 (b) is not contravened.
S2.7 (c): Requests that this clause is amended to stipulate that safety is to be jointly determined by the skipper and crew of the HBRC contracted or owned vessel on a river. Decision to not go on a river may be determined by either crew or skipper with any decision not to embark/launch /undertake work overriding any decision to go on any water body. |
Clause 3.2.1: Agree that jet boats are the best platform on which to undertake surveys. However do not agree that there is a necessity to uplift speed restrictions as the sole reasoning behind using a jet boat is to avoid damage to propeller driven vessels. Jet boats are used in many areas throughout NZ to undertake surveys, for example by DOC, and when doing so are operated at less than planning speeds and within the rules.
Clause 3.8.1: Consider that clause 3.8.1 should be amended to include signage as a means of advising of a reserved area and in doing so satisfy the public notification requirement; there is no period for public notification specified in this clause. Clause 3.8.1 to read: The Council, on application or of its own mind... Such notification may for the purpose of hydrometric surveys conducted by HBRC consist of signs erected at all access points on the length of river to be surveyed. Clause 3.8.3: The hydrology department should design signage that advises of surveys being undertaken in the length of the river without specifying a period of duration. Simply removing such signage will be sufficient to indicate the survey has been completed. Consider that signs warning of activity should be displayed at all possible points of boat launching within the area where a survey is to be undertaken. Schedule 2- S2.7 (a): The fact that a boat is crossing the river from side to side should be included on the signage as suggested above. S2.7 (c): This is not a matter for inclusion in the bylaws but should be covered in a COP and included in training for a Boat Operator’s Permit. |
|
SUGGESTED CHANGES TO PROPOSED BYLAWS RESULTING FROM PUBLIC MEETING HELD AT NAPIER SAILING CLUB THURSDAY 22 SEPTEMBER 2011.
Clause |
Version 1 Bylaw wording |
Version 2 Bylaw wording |
Definitions |
Not defined |
Paddle craft- Any ship, vessel or craft that is wholly propelled using paddles or oars. This includes but is not limited to kayaks, canoes, dinghies, waka ama, and surf skis. |
2.1.2 |
craft |
No change proposed |
2.3.2 (c) |
notify the Harbourmaster and PONL Security prior to the engines being tested. |
notify the Harbourmaster and Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security prior to the engines being tested. |
2.6.4 |
The owner or master of an unattended vessel berthed at West Quay or the Iron Pot, at berths accessible to the public, must ensure the vessel’s moorings are secured utilising a wire strop and padlock acceptable to the Harbourmaster or Enforcement Officer, to prevent the release of mooring lines by unauthorised persons.
|
The owner or master of an unattended vessel berthed at West Quay or the Iron Pot, which are accessible to the public, must ensure the vessel’s moorings are secured utilising a wire strop, or wire strop equivalent but not a chain, and padlock, code MS153, acceptable to the Harbourmaster or Enforcement Officer, to prevent the release of mooring lines by unauthorised persons.
|
2.7.3 |
No person shall anchor any vessel in the areas shown on maps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 1.9 and 2.3 listed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster.
|
No person shall anchor any vessel in the shaded areas shown on maps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.8, 1.9 and 2.3 listed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster.
|
2.7.4 |
No person shall anchor any vessel, so as to impede the safe passage of any other vessel, having particular regard for the Approach Channels as defined on map 1.7 and Chart NZ 5612.
|
No person shall anchor any vessel, so as to impede the safe passage of any other vessel which cannot deviate from its course because of constraints of draft and/or manoeuvrability.
|
2.7.5 |
No clause |
Clause 2.7.3 shall not apply to dinghy sailing support vessels when temporarily anchored between Pandora Bridge and Napier City Council Meeanee finger wharf No. 1. |
2.12.2 |
No clause |
Clause 2.12.1 shall not apply to a tender used solely for accessing a moored vessel, where access does not cross a main channel as shown on Map 1.5. |
2.13 |
2.14.1 and 2.14.2 |
2.13.1 and 2.13.2 |
2.13.1 |
2.14.1 The master and owner of a vessel shall ensure the vessel is marked with its name or similar identifying marks. This shall be displayed, on each side of the vessel. The number or name shall be a minimum height of 90 millimetres and each character shall be legible. |
No change other than reference to 2.14.1 to become 2.13.1. |
2.13.2 |
Clause 2.14.1 shall not apply to non-mechanically powered vessels of less than 6 metres in length. Such vessels should be marked with a name, or the owners name or contact details somewhere on the vessel. |
Clause 2.13.1 shall not apply to non-mechanically powered vessels of less than 6 metres in length. Such vessels should be marked with a number or name, or the owners name or contact details somewhere on the vessel’s hull.. |
3.2.8 |
Clauses 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 shall not apply to a rescue craft operated by members of Surf Lifesaving New Zealand, while undertaking rescue operations or while it is being operated under supervision in accordance with an inflatable rescue boat training programme approved by the Director of Maritime New Zealand.
|
Clauses 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 shall not apply to a rescue craft operated by members of Surf Lifesaving New Zealand or Hawke’s Bay Coastguard, while undertaking rescue operations or while it is being operated under supervision in accordance with an inflatable rescue boat training programme approved by the Director of Maritime New Zealand or a Coastguard training programme. |
4.6.2 |
Any person who discharges, drops, causes or allows to be discharged, any cargo or any other material into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters shall be liable for the cost of removal.
|
Any person who discharges, drops, causes or allows to be discharged, any cargo or any other material into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters that would or may constitute a danger to navigation safety shall be liable for the cost of removal. |
4.6.3; 4.6.4 |
PONL Breakwater Harbour |
Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour and Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security |
Schedule1-Map 1.5 and Map 1.7 |
No wording |
Investigate making Map 1.5 and Map 1.7 full page maps in order that shaded areas may be better delineated with lights and buoys shown.. Also show limits of both harbours with dotted lines. |
Schedule S1.6 |
SANDY BAY-HARDINGE ROAD The area designated in Sandy Bay as shown on map 1.6 is reserved for swimming only. Motorised vessels are not permitted to enter the area between the buoys and the shore at any time, unless authorised by the Harbourmaster or an Enforcement officer. N.B.The Harbourmaster is currently attempting to find evidence of this area being named by local iwi, however to date nothing has been found. However it has been established that the “bay” is owned by Port of Napier Limited, was created with the construction of the groyne and that it is shown on Port of Napier Limited documents as “Battery Road Beach”. Therefore should evidence appear it is intended to address the issue by naming the area with both names. The research has not been in vane as the Harbourmaster, in his other role as a Historian, has gained further valuable knowledge of Hawke’s Bay.
|
BATTERY ROAD BEACH The area designated inside the buoys at Battery Road Beach, as shown on map 1.6, is reserved for swimming only. Motorised vessels are not permitted to enter the area between the buoys and the shore at any time, unless authorised by the Harbourmaster or an Enforcement officer.
Change label of map 1.6 to “BATTERY ROAD BEACH”, and possibly local iwi name. |
Schedule S2.4 (d) |
The area from 400 meters upstream to 100 metres downstream of the Beach Rd... |
The area from 400 metres upstream to 100 metres downstream of the Beach Rd. |
Attachment 4 |
Quotes for Bylaws Signs, Speed Buoys, Battery Road Beach Buoys, Porangahau River Buoys
and Porangahau River Boat Ramp Re-Instatement
Location |
Item |
Supplier |
Quote |
Hardinge Road |
2 X 5 Knot Speed Buoys |
Council Preferred Provider |
$5500 |
Battery Road Beach |
4 X Vessels Excluded Buoys |
Council Preferred Provider |
|
Porangahau River |
Orange Mussel Buoy 704mm X 1296mm |
Estimate |
$150 |
Porangahau River |
7mm Rope, Shackles, Anchor, Eye Bolts, 7mm Wire Rope |
Various |
$500 |
Porangahau River |
100 X Set Net Floats |
Estimate |
$ 300 |
Porangahau River |
Reinstate Boat Ramp |
Various |
$5000 |
Throughout Hawke’s Bay |
Signs |
Council Preferred Provider |
$8700 |
Total |
|
|
$20,000 |
Attachment 5 |
FINAL DRAFT
STATEMENT OF PROPOSAL OF
HAWKE’S BAY NAVIGATION SAFETY BYLAWS 2012
N.B. Page numbers to be confirmed at completion of final layout
CONTENTS
1 Preliminary Provisions 3
1.1 Title and commencement 3
1.2 Areas within which these Bylaws apply 3
1.3 Definition of terms 4
2 General Matters 8
2.1 Personal flotation devices 8
2.2 Swimming or diving around wharves 9
2.3 Use of vessel engine around wharves, ramps 9
2.4 Vessels which are not Seaworthy 9
2.5 Seaplanes 10
2.6 Vessels to be adequately moored or secured 10
2.7 Prohibited and restricted anchorages 10
2.8 Obstructions 10
2.9 Notification of collisions or accidents 11
2.10 Aids to navigation 11
2.11 Sound and light signals
2.12 Visibility of kayaks and paddle craft
2.13 Identification of vessels
3 Operating Requirements 12
3.1 Minimum age for operating powered vessels 12
3.2 Speed of vessels 12
3.3 Lookouts on vessel used for water skiing and towing 13
3.4 Water skiing or towing between sunset and sunrise 13
3.5 Access lanes 13
3.6 Conduct in access lanes 14
3.7 Marking of access lanes 14
3.8 Reserved areas 14
3.9 Reserved areas for special events 14
3.10 Conduct in reserved areas 15
3.11 Marking of reserved areas 15
3.12 Collision prevention 15
3.13 Duty of master of a vessel under 500 gross tonnage 15
3.14 Moving prohibited zone. 15
3.15 Dive operations 15
4 Tankers, Hazardous Cargoes, Hazardous Works and Dangerous Materials 16
4.1 Vessels carrying explosives 16
4.2 Signals to be displayed by oil tankers 16
4.3 Duties of master while tanker is in port 16
4.4 Oil tankers not to lie close to other vessels 17
4.5 Hot work operations
4.6 Loading or discharge of cargo 17
5 Administrative Matters 18
5.1 Revocation of Bylaws 18
5.2 Suspensions and exemptions from these bylaws 18
5.3 Application to Master/Owner 18
5.4 Vessels to be licensed 18
5.5 Fees and Charges 19
Schedule 1: Coastal Waters – Location Specific Information 20
S1.1 Whangawehi 20
S1.2 Mahia Beach 21
S1.3 Waikokopu 22
S1.4 Napier Pilotage Area 23
S1.5 Westshore/Inner Harbour/Ahuriri/Battery Road Beach 24
S1.6 Port of Napier Breakwater Harbour and Approaches 24
S1.7 Waimarama Beach 27
S1.8 Kairakau Beach 28
Schedule 2: Inland Waters – Location Specific Information 29
S2.1 Wairoa River 29
S2.2 Mohaka River 39
S2.3 Clive and Ngaruroro Rivers 40
S2.4 Porangahau River
S2.5 Te Paerahi Beach 42
S2.6 General provision for rivers with speed upliftings 33
S2.7 River Safety Rules 33
Schedule 3: Oil Transfers 34
Schedule 4: Hot Work Permit 35
Attachment 5 |
1 Preliminary Provisions
1.1 Title and commencement
1.1.1 These bylaws are the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012.
1.1.2 These bylaws come into force on date.
1.2 Areas within which these Bylaws apply
These Bylaws apply to all waters within the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council boundary as shown in Figure 1 except:
▪ Lake Waikaremoana
▪ Lake Waikareiti
1.3 Definition of terms
In these bylaws, unless the context otherwise requires:
Access Lane |
means an area designated as an access lane in Schedule 1 of these bylaws |
||
Accident |
means an occurrence that involves a vessel and in which: (a) a person is seriously harmed as a result of: (i) being on the vessel; or (ii) direct contact with any part of the vessel, including any part that has become detached from the vessel; or (iii) direct exposure to the wash of the vessel or interaction (other than direct contact) between two vessels; or (iv) being involved in the salvage of any vessel except where the injuries are self inflicted or inflicted by other persons, or when injuries are to stowaways hiding outside areas normally available to passengers and crew; or (b) the vessel sustains damage or structural failure that: (i) adversely affects the structural strength, performance, or seaworthiness of the vessel; or (ii) would normally require major repair or replacement of the affected component; or (iii) poses a threat to the safety of people on board the vessel; or (c) there is a complete or partial failure of machinery or equipment that affects the seaworthiness of the vessel; or (d) there is a loss of, or damage to, or movement of, or change in the state of, the cargo of the vessel which poses a risk to the vessel or other vessels; or (e) there is a significant loss of, or significant damage to, property (not being the cargo carried by the vessel) or the property of any person (whether or not on board the vessel), whether or not the loss or damage arises from an interaction between two vessels; or (f) there is a loss or escape of any substance or thing that: (i) may result or has resulted, in serious harm to any person; or (ii) may pose a risk, or has resulted in damage to the vessel or other vessels; or (iii) may pose a risk, or has resulted in any damage to any property (whether or not on board the vessel); or
(g) a person is lost at sea (whether or not subsequently found) or is missing; or (h) the vessel is foundering, capsizing, being abandoned, stranding, missing, or has foundered, capsized, been abandoned, stranded, been in a collision, or has a major fire on board. |
||
Act |
means the Local Government Act 1974 |
||
Aid to Navigation |
includes: (a) any lightship and any floating or other light exhibited for the guidance of ships; (b) any description of fog signal not carried on a vessel; (c) all marks and signs in aid of marine navigation; (d) any electronic, radio or other aid of marine navigation not carried on board any ship |
|
|
Aircraft |
has the same meaning as in the Civil Aviation Act 1990 |
|
|
Anchorage |
in relation to vessels, means a place (enclosed or otherwise) normally used for the anchoring of vessels to the bed of the waterway, whether the place is reserved for such purposes by the Council or not |
|
|
Anchoring |
means the temporary securing of a vessel to the bed of the waterway by means of an anchor, cable or other device, that is normally removed with the vessel when it leaves the site or anchorage |
|
|
Beacon |
means a light or mark set up in a prominent position as a navigation mark or a warning to vessels |
|
|
Buoy |
means a float secured to the seabed serving as a navigation or location mark, or to indicate reefs, other hazards or a mooring |
|
|
Buoyancy Aid |
Means: (a) a buoyancy aid as defined in NZ standard 5823:1989 or NZ standard 5823:2001 or any subsequent NZ standard, or (b) a buoyancy aid that the Director is satisfied substantially complies with the standard prescribed in subclause (a) above and that provides a minimum of 53 newtons buoyancy. |
|
|
Class 3 packing group I oil products |
means oil having an initial boiling point less than or equal to 35 degrees centigrade |
|
|
Class 3 packing group II oil products |
means oil having a flashpoint of less than 23 degrees centigrade and an initial boiling point greater than 35 degrees centigrade |
|
|
Class 3 packing group III oil products |
means oil having a flashpoint equal to or greater than 23 degrees centigrade up to and including 61 degrees centigrade and an initial boiling point greater than 35 degrees centigrade |
|
|
Coastal Marine Area |
means the foreshore, seabed, and coastal water, and the airspace above the water: (a) of which the seaward boundary is the outer limits of the territorial sea (b) of which the landward boundary is the line of mean high water springs, except that where that line crosses a river, the landward boundary at that point shall be whichever is the lesser of; (i) one kilometre upstream from the mouth of the river; or (ii) the point upstream that is calculated by multiplying the width of river mouth by width of the river mouth by 5. |
|
|
Commercial Vessel |
means a vessel that is not: (a) A pleasure craft; or (b) Solely powered manually; or (c) Solely powered by sail |
|
|
Council |
means the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council as constituted under the Act |
|
|
Craft |
has the same meaning as ship or vessel |
|
|
Crew |
means the persons employed or engaged in any capacity on board a vessel, but does not include the master, a pilot, or a person temporarily employed on the vessel while in port |
|
|
Director |
means the person who is for the time being the Director of Maritime New Zealand under Section 439 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994 |
|
|
Emergency Response Craft |
any vessel approved by the Harbourmaster for use in emergency response and includes Police, Customs, Harbourmaster, Naval and port company vessels |
|
|
Enforcement Officer |
means a person appointed as an enforcement officer under section 650B of the Act |
|
|
Explosive |
means any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in its normal state is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect. Substances included within this definition can be more fully found in the Hazardous Substance and New Organism Act 1996 |
|
|
Flag A |
means Flag A of the International Code of Signals (the divers flag), a burgee (swallow-tailed) flag coloured in white and blue, with white to the mast, of not less than 600 mm by 600 mm |
|
|
Flag B |
means flag B of the international code of signals, a burgee (swallow tailed) flag coloured in red, or a rigid replica, of not less than 600 mm by 600 mm |
|
|
Foreshore |
means any land covered and uncovered by the flow and ebb of the tide at mean springs and, in relation to any such land that forms part of the bed of a river, but does not include any area that is not part of the coastal marine area |
|
|
Gross Tonnage |
means the volume of all the vessels enclosed spaces (from keel to funnel) measured to the outside of the hull framing |
|
|
Harbourmaster |
is the person(s) appointed by the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council as Harbourmaster to exercise authority under these Bylaws and all relevant associated legislation; and includes any deputy of a Harbourmaster |
|
|
Honorary Enforcement Officer |
means a person appointed as an Honorary Enforcement Officer under section 650B of the Act |
|
|
Incident |
means any occurrence, other than an accident that is associated with the operation of a vessel and affects or could affect the safety of the operation |
|
|
Impede the Passage |
means to cause a vessel, whether by action or inaction on the part of another vessel, to alter course, alter speed or stop, or to prepare to do so when she would have otherwise not done so |
|
|
Kiteboarding |
(also known as kite surfing) means using a controllable kite to pull the rider through the water on a small surfboard, a wakeboard, or a kiteboard |
|
|
Length |
in relation to a vessel, means overall length |
|
|
Maritime Rules |
means Maritime Rules made under section 36 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994 |
|
|
Master |
means any person having command or charge of a vessel, but does not include a pilot who is piloting the vessel |
|
|
Moor |
means: (a) the securing of any vessel alongside a wharf or jetty and (b) the securing of any vessel to a mooring or anchor |
|
|
Mooring |
means: (a) any weight or article placed in or on the foreshore or the bed of a waterway for the purpose of permanently securing a vessel, raft, aircraft, or floating structure; and (b) includes any wire, rope, chain, buoy, or other device attached or connected to the weight; (c) but does not include an anchor that is normally removed with the vessel, raft, aircraft, or floating structure when it leaves the site or anchorage |
|
|
Mooring Area |
means the area from time to time designated by the Council as a mooring management area under the Resource Management Act 1991, where vessel moorings may be placed; but does not include an anchorage |
|
|
Nautical Chart |
a map of a sea area showing on it any coastlines, rocks and dangers to vessels etc. within the area covered and also showing the positions of aids to navigation and other prominent features |
|
|
Navigable Waters |
means any waters whether coastal or inland which are able to be navigated; and includes harbours |
|
|
Navigate |
means the act or process of managing or directing the course of a vessel on, through, over, or under the water |
|
|
Obstruction |
means an object, equipment, structure, vessel or person positioned, whether in the water or not, so as to restrict or prevent navigation of a vessel or cause a hazard to people on a vessel |
|
|
Oil |
means petroleum in any form including crude oil, fuel oil, sludge, oil refuse; and includes spirit produced from oil and oil mixed with water and refined products (within the meaning of section 222 of the Maritime Transport Act 1994) |
|
|
Owner |
Includes: (a) in relation to a vessel, the agent of the owner and also a charterer; and (b) in relation to any dock, wharf, quay, or slipway, includes a leasee or consent holder of the dock, wharf, quay, or slipway: or
(c) In relation to a fishing vessel; other than one to which paragraph (a) or (b) of this definition applies, means the person registered as owner under section 57 of the Fisheries act 1983; or (d) In relation to a vessel to which paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) of this definition applies, where, by virtue of any charter or demise or for any other reason, the registered owner is not responsible for the management of the vessel, includes the charterer or other person who is for the time being so responsible: or (e) in relation to an unregistered vessel or a registered vessel that does not have a registered owner, means the person who is for the time being responsible for the management of the vessel |
|
|
Paddle craft
Personal Flotation Device |
Any ship, vessel or craft that is wholly propelled using paddles or oars or a combination of paddles and oars. This includes but is not limited to kayaks, canoes, dinghies, waka ama and surf skis.
means any buoyancy aid that is designed to be worn on the body that meets: (a) a standard in New Zealand, standard 5823:2001 applicable to such buoyancy aids (b) a national or international standard that the Director of Maritime Safety is satisfied substantially complies with a standard in New Zealand standard 5823:2001 applicable to such buoyancy aids |
|
|
Pleasure Craft |
means a vessel that is used exclusively for the owner’s pleasure or as the owner’s residence, and is not offered or used for hire or reward; but does not include: (a) a vessel that is provided for transport or sport or recreation by or on behalf of any institution, hotel, motel, place of entertainment or other establishment or business (b) a vessel that is used on any voyage of pleasure if it is normally used or intended to be normally used as a fishing vessel or for the carriage of passengers or cargo for hire or reward |
|
|
|
(c) a vessel that is operated or provided by any club, incorporated society, trust or business |
|
|
Personal Water Craft |
means a power driven vessel that: (a) has a fully enclosed hull; and (b) does not take on water if capsized (c) is designed to be operated by a person standing, sitting astride, or kneeling on it but not seated in it |
|
|
Pilot |
in relation to any ship means any person not being the master or a member of the crew of the ship who has the conduct of the ship |
|
|
Power driven vessel |
means any vessel propelled by machinery |
|
|
Proper Speed |
means speed through the water |
|
|
Public Notice |
means a notice in a newspaper circulating generally in the district or region to which the subject matter of the notice relates |
|
|
Recreational Craft |
means a vessel that is: (a) a pleasure craft; or (b) solely powered manually; or (c) solely powered by sail |
|
|
Region |
means the Hawke’s Bay Region as constituted under the Local Government Act 1974 |
|
|
Reserved Area |
means any area defined as such under Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) of these Bylaws |
|
|
Reward |
means the payment to or for the benefit of the owner or master of a vessel, of a contribution towards the expenses of a voyage by or on behalf of persons; but does not include payment of any contributions by part owners of the vessel or by persons engaged as bona fide crew members |
|
|
Sailboard |
means any type of board that is propelled by a detachable sail apparatus and operated by a person standing on the board |
|
|
Seaplane |
means a flying boat or any other aircraft designed to manoeuvre on the water, and under Maritime Rule 22 is deemed to be a vessel when operating on the water |
|
|
Seaworthy |
in relation to any vessel means being in a fit condition or readiness to safely undertake a sea voyage |
|
|
Ship |
means every description of boat or craft used in navigation, whether or not it has any means of propulsion; and includes: (a) A barge, lighter, or other like vessel (b) A hovercraft or other thing deriving full or partial support in the atmosphere from the reaction of air against the surface of the water over which it operates (c) A submarine or other submersible |
|
|
Shore |
when referring to distance from shore, means distance from the waters edge |
|
|
Structure |
means: (a) any building, equipment, device, or other facility made by people and which is fixed to land or seabed; and (b) includes slipways, jetties, pile moorings, swing moorings, rafts, wharves, marine farms, and other objects whether or not these are above or below the waterline of the foreshore; but (c) does not include aids to navigation |
|
|
Sunrise |
means the time of sunrise as stated in the New Zealand Nautical Almanac NZ204 |
|
|
Sunset |
means the time of sunset as stated in the New Zealand Nautical Almanac NZ204 |
|
|
Support Vessel |
means any vessel used for coaching, marshalling and rescue attendance for training, regattas and competitions |
|
|
Surfboard |
means any type of board that is designed to be used for surf riding |
|
|
Tanker |
means any vessel which: (a) is specially constructed, or has a compartment or compartments specially constructed, for the carriage in bulk of oil products of any class; and (b) either: (i) has on board or is about to take on board a cargo the whole or any part of which consists of Class 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3 oil products in bulk; or (ii) has discharged any cargo consisting of any such oil products in bulk, but the holds, tanks, and compartment of which have not been rendered or certified gas-free and includes any tanker designed for carriage of bulk liquid harmful substances |
|
|
Underway |
means that a vessel is not at anchor, or made fast to the shore, or aground |
|
|
Vessel |
has the same meaning as ship |
|
|
Waterskiing |
means being towed barefoot or on an object of any kind other than a vessel |
|
|
Windsurfer |
has the same meaning as sailboard |
|
|
2 General Matters
2.1 Personal flotation devices
2.1.1 No person in charge of a recreational craft shall use it unless there are onboard at the time of use, and in a readily accessible location, sufficient personal flotation devices of an appropriate size for each person on board.
2.1.2 Personal flotation devices must be worn at all times on all craft of 6 metres or less and all paddlecraft when the craft is underway or preparing to become underway.
2.1.3. Clause 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.6 shall not apply to:
(a) any surfboard or similar unpowered craft; and
(b) any sailboarder, kiteboarder or windsurfer, if a wetsuit is worn at all times; and
(c) a diver on a boat of 6 metres or less in length overall that is used for recreational diving within 5 miles of shore, if a full body dive suit is worn at all times; and
(d) a person training for or participating in a sporting event, if the training or the event is supervised in accordance with the safety system of a sporting organisation approved by the Harbourmaster under these bylaws, or the Director under Maritime Rule 91.4(3); and
(e) a member of a visiting foreign watersports team, if the person carries or wears a personal flotation device that is approved by the competent authority for use in that person's country of residence.
2.1.4 (a) The Harbourmaster may approve a sporting organisation for the purposes of clause 2.1.3.(d) if that organisation has in place a safety system that the Harbour Master is satisfied provides an equivalent level of safety to the carriage or wearing of personal flotation devices.
(b) The Director, under Maritime Rule 91.4(3), may approve a national sporting organisation for the purposes of clause 2.1.3.(d) if that organisation has in place a safety system that the Director is satisfied provides an equivalent level of safety to the carriage or wearing of personal floatation devices.
2.1.5 Subject to clause 2.1.6 clauses 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 shall not apply in respect of any sporting event, training activity or ceremonial event if a support vessel that is capable of providing adequate assistance in the event of an emergency remains in the immediate vicinity of the recreational craft and the recreational craft or support vessel or both carry personal flotation devices or buoyancy aids of an appropriate size for each person on board the recreational craft.
2.1.6 Clauses 2.1.1, 2.1.2 and 2.1.7 shall not apply in respect of any sporting event, training activity, ceremonial event, or other organised recreational activity if the Harbourmaster with jurisdiction for the applicable region has granted an exemption in writing. A Harbourmaster may grant an exemption for a specified period if it is satisfied that adequate safety precautions are made for rescuing any person participating in the event or activity.
2.1.7 Despite clause 2.1.5 no person in charge of a recreational craft may use that craft in circumstances where tides, river flows, visibility, rough seas, adverse weather, emergencies or other situations cause danger or a risk to the safety of persons on board, unless every person on board is wearing a properly secured personal flotation device of an appropriate size for that person.
2.1.8 No person in charge of a vessel shall use it to tow any person and no person shall cause himself or herself to be towed by any vessel, unless the person being towed wears a properly secured personal flotation device of an appropriate size for that person.
2.1.9 Clause 2.1.8 shall not apply to a person:
(a) training for any trick water skiing element of a sporting event administered by a national sporting organisation approved under clause 2.1.4 or Maritime Rule 91.4(3); or
(b) participating in a sporting event that is administered by a national sporting organisation approved under clause 2.1.4 or Maritime Rule 91.4(3).
2.2 Swimming or diving around wharves
2.2.1 No person shall jump, dive, swim or undertake other related activities, from;
(a) any commercial jetty, wharf, or quay which is in regular use for the berthing and unberthing of vessels, or
(b) within 50 metres of the structures listed in 2.2.1 (a), or
(c) within any designated anchorage or mooring area, or
(d) within any navigational channel or
(e) any other such areas in the navigable waters of the region as the Harbourmaster may from time to time determine, unless the person does so in accordance with the prior written consent of the Harbourmaster.
2.2.2 The Harbourmaster may consent subject to such conditions as the Harbourmaster considers appropriate in the interests of navigation safety.
2.3 Use of vessel engine around wharves, ramps
2.3.1 No person shall operate the propulsion system of a vessel while it is lying at any wharf, or while it is loading or unloading at any ramp, in such a way that it may damage any property, scour the bed of the waterway, or injure any person. However, this bylaw does not preclude the use of the propulsion system for the safe berthing or unberthing of any vessel at a wharf.
2.3.2 In addition to the requirements of clause 2.3.1, a master of a commercial vessel in the Port of Napier Breakwater Harbour shall ensure that a crew member shall:
(a) be stationed both forward and aft on any vessel while that vessel is lying at any wharf and about to test or testing a propulsion system; and
(b) warn all persons or vessels in the immediate vicinity of that vessel that the engines are being tested.
(c) notify the Harbourmaster and Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security prior to the engines being tested.
2.4 Vessels which are not Seaworthy
2.4.1 The master and/or owner of every vessel anchored or moored in any waters in the region must keep the vessel in a seaworthy condition at all times, unless the Harbourmaster has given prior written approval for it to be anchored or moored in a condition which is not seaworthy and subject to such conditions that the Harbourmaster may determine appropriate to ensure navigation safety.
2.4.2 If any vessel is a navigation hazard by reason of it not being seaworthy:
(a) the Harbourmaster may give a direction to the master and/owner of that ship to move the vessel to an alternative location or remove it from the waters of the region within a reasonable time specified in the direction. Such direction may be given by any means of communication and subsequently supported by a written direction; and
(b) where the master and/or owner of a vessel fails to move that vessel in accordance with such direction given by the Harbourmaster, the Harbourmaster may move that vessel to a position where it is no longer a hazard or remove it from the water. Costs incurred will be recovered from the owner of the vessel as a debt due to Council.
The owner and master are jointly and severally responsible for ensuring the direction is complied with.
2.4.3 No person shall operate any vessel that is not seaworthy except to comply with the directions under this Bylaw of the Harbourmaster to move that vessel to an alternative location. However, in the event of an emergency or an accident at sea, the person in charge of the vessel shall proceed to a safe area immediately.
2.5 Seaplanes
2.5.1 No person navigating a vessel shall impede a seaplane in the process of landing or taking off.
2.5.2 No person shall take off, land or attempt to take off or land any seaplane or other aircraft, except in an emergency, in any area, other than areas reserved for that purpose, without the prior written permission of the Harbourmaster. Written application must be received by the Harbourmaster not less than 48 hours before the proposed landing or taking off.
2.6 Vessels to be adequately moored or secured
2.6.1 No person shall anchor or moor a vessel in any navigable water in a manner that it may break free, drag anchor or cause a navigational safety hazard.
2.6.2 No person shall cut, break, unlawfully release or destroy:
(a) the mooring or anchor of any vessel; or
(b) the fastening securing any vessel lying in a dock or at or near a wharf or landing place.
2.6.3 The owner or master of a vessel berthed at a wharf, or at anchor, must ensure that it is securely fastened at all times and, if required by the Harbourmaster, maintain a person on board to keep a watch.
2.6.4 The owner or master of an unattended vessel berthed at West Quay or the Iron Pot, which is accessible to the public, must ensure the vessel’s moorings are secured utilising a wire strop, or wire strop equivalent but not a chain, and padlock, code MS153, acceptable to the Harbourmaster or Enforcement Officer, to prevent the release of mooring lines by unauthorised persons.
2.7 Prohibited and restricted anchorages
2.7.1 Except in emergencies no person may anchor or moor any vessel within any prohibited anchorage.
2.7.2 No person shall anchor a vessel so as to:
(a) obstruct the passage of other vessels or obstruct the approach to any commercial wharf, pier or jetty; or
(b) create a hazard to other vessels at anchor; or
(c) create a safety hazard for other recreational craft, swimmers or water users.
2.7.3. No person shall anchor any vessel in the shaded areas shown on maps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 2.3 listed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster.
2.7.4 No person shall anchor any vessel, so as to impede the safe passage of any other vessel which cannot deviate from its course because of constraints of draft and/or maneuverability.
2.7.5 Clause 2.7.3 shall not apply to dinghy sailing support vessels when temporarily anchored between Pandora Bridge and Napier City Council Meeanee finger wharf No. 1.
2.8 Obstructions
2.8.1 No person shall obstruct the navigation of any waterway or the access to any wharf, landing place, boat ramp, slipway, navigation channel or mooring without the prior written permission of the Harbourmaster.
2.8.2 No person shall place any obstruction, including any vessel, fishing apparatus, in any waterway, that is liable to:
(a) restrict navigation; or
(b) cause or have potential to cause, injury or death to any person; or
(c) cause damage to any vessel or any property.
2.8.3 No person shall leave equipment, stabilizers, booms, cranes, davits or other equipment extending over the side of a vessel so as to cause a hazard to any other vessel.
2.9 Notification of collisions or accidents
2.9.1 The master of any vessel that:
(a) has been involved in a collision with any vessel or property, or has been sunk or grounded or become stranded in any waterway; or
(b) by reason of accident, fire, defect or otherwise is in such a condition as to affect its safe navigation or to give rise to danger to other vessels or property; or
(c) in any manner gives rise to an obstruction; or
(d) causes any damage to any navigation aid or structure or to anything on the structure;
must, as well as complying with any accident reporting requirements of the Maritime Transport Act 1994, as soon as practicable report the occurrence to the Harbourmaster and within 48 hours, provide the Harbourmaster with full written details of the occurrence.
2.9.2 A report under clause 2.9.1 must include:
(a) a full description of any injury to persons and their names and their addresses; and
(b) a full description of any damage to vessels or structures; and
(c) the name(s) and address(es) of person(s) in charge of the vessel.
(d) Time and date of the occurrence; and
(e) An outline of the events relating to the occurrence
2.9.3 If an incident described in clause 2.9.1 involves damage to a vessel that affects or is likely to affect its seaworthiness, the master may not move the vessel except:
(a) to clear the main navigational channel or to moor or anchor in safety; or
(b) in accordance with the directions of the Harbourmaster.
2.10 Aids to navigation
2.10.1 No person shall secure their vessel to any aid to navigation without the prior permission of the Harbourmaster.
2.10.2 No person shall damage, remove, deface or otherwise interfere with any aid to navigation erected by, or duly authorised by, the Harbourmaster as an aid to navigation, or warning.
2.10.3 No person shall tie a vessel to any aid to navigation without the written permission of;
(a) the Harbourmaster if the aid to navigation is operated by a local authority or port company; or
(b) the Director if the aid to navigation is operated by Maritime New Zealand.
2.10.4 No person shall erect, maintain or display any aid to navigation or other device which may be used or mistaken as a recognised aid to navigation without the written permission of the Harbourmaster and Director of Maritime New Zealand.
2.11 Sound and light signals
2.11.1 No person shall fit or use any flashing lights, sirens or other sound or light signals not prescribed in a maritime rule for that vessel, without the written permission of the Harbourmaster.
2.11.2 The use of blue flashing lights and/or sirens is restricted to Police, Customs, Harbourmaster or other enforcement vessels authorised by the Harbourmaster
2.11.3 The use of purple flashing lights is for the use of an emergency response craft, authorised by the Harbourmaster, to identify itself to a vessel or aircraft involved in a response.
2.11.4 A vessel authorised to use purple flashing lights by the Harbourmaster shall only display them when:
(a) the use is required to assist the location of a vessel or person in need of assistance; or
(b) the use is required to assist the identification of the vessel to an aircraft involved in an incident.
The lights may not be used when travelling to, from or during an incident, and imply no status or privilege to that vessel. Any vessel so authorised by this clause must observe clause 3.2 at all times.
2.11.5 No person may blow or sound, or cause to be blown or sounded, the whistle, siren or horn of a vessel, within any harbour area, except as a navigation safety signal. However, nothing in these bylaws precludes the testing of such a whistle, siren or horn before the vessel leaves any wharf or for maintenance purposes.
2.12 VISIBILITY OF KAYAKS AND PADDLE CRAFT
2.12.1. Every person operating a kayak or paddle craft of less than seven metres shall use
one of the following methods to enhance its visibility to other vessels.
By day
· Utilising brightly coloured paddles.
· paddling a brightly coloured kayak or paddle craft;
· wearing a brightly coloured PFD or paddle jacket;
· exhibiting a brightly coloured flag on a small mast.
At night
· showing an all-round white light or flashing white light that is visible in all directions for a
minimum of 100 metres.
2.12.2 Clause 2.12.1 shall not apply to a tender used solely for accessing a moored vessel
where access does not cross a main channel as shown on Map 1.5.
2.13 IDENTIFICATION OF VESSELS
2.13.1 The master and owner of a vessel shall ensure the vessel is marked with its name or similar
identifying marks. This shall be displayed, on each side of the vessel. The number or name
shall be a minimum height of 90 millimetres and each character shall be legible.
2.13.2 Clause 2.14.1 shall not apply to non-mechanically powered vessels of less than 6 metres in
length. Such vessels should be marked with a number or name, or the owners name or
contact details somewhere on the vessel’s hull.
Operating Requirements
3.1 Minimum age for operating powered vessels
3.1.1 No person under the age of years shall be in charge of, or propel or navigate, a power driven vessel that is capable of a proper speed exceeding 10 knots unless he or she is under the direct supervision of a person over the age of 15 years who is within immediate reach of the controls, and is not the lookout person as provided for in clause 3.3.
3.1.2 The owner of a power driven vessel that is capable of a proper speed exceeding 10 knots must not allow any person who is under the age of 15 years to be in charge of or propel or navigate that vessel, unless he or she is under the direct supervision of a person over the age of 15 years who is within immediate reach of the controls.
3.1.3 Clause 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 does not apply in respect of any person who has a written exemption from the Harbourmaster issued in accordance with a navigation bylaw, or by the Director under Maritime Rule 91.(4).
3.1.4 The Harbourmaster may issue an exemption in accordance with these bylaws that is valid for any specified place or places to a person under the age of 15 years for transport, training, competitions or other sporting events, if the Harbourmaster:
(a) considers that the person
(i) is competent to propel or navigate a power driven vessel at a proper speed exceeding 10 knots; and
(ii) is aware of relevant navigation safety rules and navigation bylaws; and
(iii) will be under adequate supervision during the proposed activity or activities.
3.2 Speed of vessels
3.2.1 No person shall, without reasonable excuse, propel or navigate a vessel (including a vessel towing a person or an object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots:
(a) within 50 metres of any other vessel, raft, or person in the water; or
(b) within either 200 metres of the shore or of any structure, or on the inshore side of any row of buoys demarcating that distance from the shore or structure; or
(c) within 200 metres of any vessel, structure or raft that is flying Flag A of the International Code of Signals (diver’s flag).
3.2.2 No person shall propel or navigate a powered vessel at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots while any person has any portion of his or her body extending over the fore part, bow, or side of that vessel.
3.2.3 No person shall cause himself or herself to be towed by a vessel (whether or not on a water ski, aquaplane, or other similar object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots in any circumstances specified in Clause 3.2.1 of these bylaws.
3.2.4 No person in charge of a vessel shall permit the vessel to continue onwards, after any person being towed by that vessel has dropped (whether accidentally or otherwise) any water ski or similar object which may cause danger to any other person or vessel, without first taking appropriate action to immediately recover that water ski or similar object, unless the person has taken adequate measures to ensure that the dropped ski or similar object is clearly visible to other water users.
3.2.5 Clause 3.2.1 (a) shall not apply to:
(a) a vessel over 500 gross tonnage, if the vessel cannot be safely navigated in compliance
with this clause; or
(b) a vessel powered by sail in relation to any other vessel powered by sail, while the vessels
are participating in a yacht race or training administered by
(i) a club affiliated to Yachting New Zealand; or
(ii) a non profit organisation involved in sail training or racing; or
(c) a craft training for or participating in competitive rowing or paddling; or
(d) a tug, pilot vessel, Harbourmaster vessel, emergency response craft or police vessel, if the
vessel's duties cannot be performed in compliance with this clause; or
(e) a vessel operating in accordance with a speed uplifting established under-
(i) Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) of these bylaws.
(ii) Clauses 3.5, 3.8 or 3.9 of these bylaws
3.2.6 Clause 3.2.1.(b) shall not apply to:
(a) a vessel operating in an access lane or a reserved area for the purpose for which the
access lane or reserved area was declared;
(b) a vessel operating in accordance with a speed uplifting established under
(i) Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information) of these bylaws
(ii) Clause 3.5, 3.8 or 3.9 of these bylaws
(c) a vessel over 500 gross tonnage, if the vessel cannot be safely navigated in compliance
with this clause; or
(d) a craft training for or participating in competitive rowing or paddling; or
(e) a tug, pilot vessel, Harbourmaster vessel, emergency response craft or police vessel when
the vessel's duties cannot be performed in compliance with this clause.
3.2.7 Notwithstanding subclauses 3.2.1– 3.2.5, every person who propels or navigates a
recreational craft must ensure that its wake does not cause unnecessary danger or risk of
damage to other vessels, persons or structures.
3.2.8 Clauses 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 shall not apply to a rescue craft operated by members of Surf
Lifesaving New Zealand or Hawke’s Bay Coastguard, while undertaking rescue operations
or while it is being operated under supervision in accordance with an inflatable rescue boat
training programme approved by the Director of Maritime New Zealand or a Coastguard
training programme.
3.3 Lookouts on vessel used for water skiing and towing
3.3.1 No person in charge of a vessel shall use it to tow any person at a speed exceeding 5 knots unless at least one other person is on board who is -
(a) 10 years of age or older; and
(b) responsible for immediately notifying the person in charge of every mishap that occurs to the person who is being towed.
3.3.2 No person shall cause himself or herself to be towed by any vessel at a speed exceeding 5 knots unless at least one other person is on board who is -
(a) 10 years of age or older; and
(b) responsible for immediately notifying the person in charge of every mishap that occurs to the person who is being towed.
3.4 Water skiing or towing between sunset and sunrise
3.4.1 No person shall operate, between sunset and sunrise, a vessel that is towing any person
on water skis, an aquaplane, surfboard, or similar object, or who is barefoot skiing, or who is on a paraglider or similar object. (The times for sunset and sunrise can be found in the current edition of the New Zealand Nautical Almanac).
3.4.2 No person may cause himself or herself to be towed in the circumstances described in clause 3.4.1.
3.5 Access lanes
3.5.1 The Council may, from time to time, by Public Notice, declare that specified area or areas of any harbour shall be an access lane for the purpose of high speed access to and from the shore.
3.6 Conduct in access lanes
3.6.1 No person shall propel, navigate, or manoeuvre a vessel in an access lane for the purpose
for which it is declared except by the most direct route through the access lane and on that side of the access lane that lies to the starboard (right) side of the vessel.
3.6.2 No person shall:
(a) while being towed by a vessel in an access lane, cause himself or herself or any water ski, aquaplane or other similar object, on or by which he or she is being towed; or
(b) cause any object that is being towed by a vessel in an access lane to travel other than by
the most direct route through the access lane and on that side of the access lane that lies to the starboard (right) side of the vessel.
3.6.3 No person within an access lane shall proceed in a manner that is dangerous in relation to any vessel or other person in the access lane.
3.6.4 No person shall obstruct any other person while that other person is using an access lane for the purpose for which it has been declared.
3.6.5 If one or more persons are using an access lane for the purpose for which it is declared, no person may enter, remain in or use the lane for any other purpose.
3.6.6 The access lanes to which this bylaw applies are those prescribed in Schedule 1(Location Specific Information).
3.7 Marking of access lanes
3.7.1 Every access lane must be demarcated by:
(a) orange posts with horizontal black bands on shore; and
(b) if the access lane is marked at its outer edge, it shall be marked by orange buoys with black bands; and
(c) an adequate sign or signs in the vicinity of the access lane that declare the purpose of that lane.
3.8 Reserved areas
3.8.1 The Council, on application or of its own mind, may from time to time, by Public Notice, and in the interests of navigation safety, reserve any specified area for a specific purpose.
Such notification may for the purpose of hydrometric surveys conducted by HBRC, consist of signs erected at all access points on the length of the river to be surveyed.
3.8.2 A reservation under this bylaw may be made on such conditions, and for such period or periods, as Council may specify in the notice.
3.8.3 Every area that is reserved under this bylaw shall be indicated by notice boards that are prominently displayed on the land at the extremities of the area.
3.9 Reserved areas for special events
3.9.1 Any person intending to conduct a race, speed trial, competition or other organized water activity in any area to which these bylaws apply may apply to the Harbourmaster to:
(a) temporarily suspend the application of Clause 3.2 in part or in total in that area for the purposes of facilitating the event
(b) temporarily reserve the area for the purpose of that activity.
3.9.2 Where the Harbourmaster is satisfied that the application may be granted without endangering the public, he or she may grant the application accordingly, for a period not exceeding 10 days and on such conditions as he or she may specify.
3.9.3 No grant of an application shall have effect unless, not less than 7 days nor more than 14 days before the commencement of the activity, a public notice is given specifying the period of the activity and details of the suspension or reserved area.
3.9.4 The Council may recover, from the applicant, all actual and reasonable costs associated with the application, including any monitoring and advertising.
3.10 Conduct in reserved areas
3.10.1 No person may obstruct any other person while that other person is using a reserved area for the purpose for which it is reserved.
3.10.2 If any person is using a reserved area for the purpose for which it is reserved, no other person shall enter the reserved area other than to use it for the purpose for which it is reserved.
3.10.3 Nothing in Clause 3.10.1 or 3.10.2 prohibits the use of emergency response craft within a reserved area.
3.10.4 The reserved areas to which these bylaws apply are those prescribed in Schedules 1 and 2 (Location Specific Information), or those notified in accordance with Clauses 3.8.1 or 3.9.3.
3.11 Marking of reserved areas
3.11.1 Adequate signs shall be provided in the vicinity of a reserved area that:
(a) define the area; and
(b) declare the purpose for which the area has been reserved.
3.11.2 If the area is demarcated on shore, it is marked by black posts with white horizontal bands.
3.11 3 If the reserved area is marked at sea it is marked by black buoys with white bands.
3.11.4 Nothing in this Clause applies to reserved areas for special events made in accordance with Clause 3.9.
3.12 Collision prevention
3.12.1 No person shall operate any vessel in breach of Maritime Rules Part 22 (Collision Prevention), made under the Maritime Transport Act 1994
3.12.2 Every person commits an offence against these bylaws who, being required by an Enforcement Officer to do anything under clause 3.12.1 of these bylaws, fails to comply with that requirement as soon as is reasonably possible.
3.13 Duty of master of a vessel under 500 gross tonnage
3.13.1 The master of a vessel under 500 gross tonnage must not allow the vessel to impede the navigation of any vessel of 500 gross tonnage or more when that vessel is navigating with a pilot on board, being led by a pilot or being navigated by a Pilot Exempt Master within the Napier Pilotage Area.
3.14 Moving prohibited zone.
3.14.1 A moving prohibited zone extending to 100 m astern and to each side of a vessel, and continued at such width to 500 m ahead shall exist around any vessel of 500 gross tonnage or greater, when that vessel is under pilotage within the Napier Pilotage Area as prescribed in map 1.4 Schedule 1.
3.14.2 The master or person in charge of a vessel under 500 gross tonnage shall not navigate their vessel within the moving prohibited zone of any vessel under pilotage within the Napier Pilotage Area as prescribed in Schedule 1.
3.14.3 Clause 3.14.1 does not relieve the Master of a vessel of 500 gross tonnage or greater, of
the duty to comply with the provisions of Maritime Rule Part 22 (Collision Prevention), made under the Maritime Transport Act 1994, other than when navigating within the provisions of Clause 3.13.1.
3.14.4The provisions of clause 3.14.2 shall not apply to a vessel having prior written authority from the Harbourmaster to enter such zone.
3.15 Dive operations
3.15.1 The master of every vessel from which dive operations are in progress must ensure that flag A is displayed in such a manner that it can be clearly identified by the watch keeper of another vessel at a distance in excess of 200 metres.
3.15.2 Every person diving from a vessel must ensure that flag A is displayed in such a manner that it can be clearly identified by the watchkeeper of another vessel at a distance of 200 metres.
4. tankers, Hazardous Cargoes, Hazardous Works and Dangerous Materials
4.1 Vessels carrying explosives
4.1.1 The master of any vessel in any port, harbour, roadstead, or anchorage having on board or intending to load explosives must hoist on the ship the flag B of the International Code by day and a red light by night.
4.1.2 The master of any vessel in any port, harbour, roadstead or anchorage, or the pilot, must not allow that vessel to approach within 200 metres of any other vessel that is carrying or loading explosives, except:
(a) with the permission of the Harbour Master; or
(b) for the purpose of loading or unloading that other vessel; or
(c) for the purpose of rendering assistance to that other vessel in an emergency.
4.1.3 The master of any vessel carrying explosives in any port, harbour, roadstead, or anchorage, or the pilot, must not allow that vessel to approach within 200 metres of any other vessel, except:
(a) with the permission of the Harbour Master; or
(b) for the purpose of loading or unloading that other vessel; or
(c) for the purpose of rendering assistance to that other vessel in an emergency.
4.1.4 Nothing in Clause 4.2.1, 4.2.2 and 4.2.3 applies to any vessel which:
(a) is carrying not more than 27 kilograms of explosives; or
(b) Is carrying no explosives other than explosives of Class 1.4S as defined in the IMDG Code or fireworks of Class 1.3G, 1.4G and 1.4S as defined in the IMDG Code.
4.2 Signals to be displayed by oil tankers
4.2.1 On or immediately before the arrival in port of any vessel carrying bulk oil cargo, and so long as the vessel remains in port, the master must display by day a red Flag B of the International Code of Signals, and by night a red light at the masthead or where it can best be seen from all directions.
4.3 Duties of master while tanker is in port
4.3.1 While in port, the master of an oil tanker must operate in accordance with the current edition of the International Safety Guide for Oil Tankers and Terminals (ISGOTT).
4.3.2 The master must:
(a) berth or moor the tanker only at such wharf or place as specified for bulk oil discharges, or as otherwise permitted in writing by the Harbourmaster; and
(b) keep the tanks containing Class 3 packing groups I and II oil cargo securely closed, except when opened for loading or discharging; and
(c) in the case of a vessel carrying a cargo of bulk oil, unless exempted by the Harbourmaster, ensure that sufficient motive power is available at all times to enable the vessel to be moved from the berth in case of fire or other emergency.
4.4 Oil tankers not to lie close to other vessels
4.4.1 The master of a tanker must ensure that, except for the purpose of transshipment, the tanker does not lie within 30 metres of another vessel, unless the consent of the Harbourmaster has first been obtained in writing.
4.5 Hot work operations
4.5.1 Within the Napier Breakwater Harbour, the master of every vessel on board which or on the hull of which it is proposed to carry out welding or flame-cutting operations in or from any position, whether on board the vessel or not, must obtain a Hot Work Permit in accordance with requirements set out in Schedule 4 no less than two hours before commencing the work.
4.5.2 The master of the vessel must ensure that, before any welding operations are commenced, precautions are taken for the detection, prevention, and extinguishing of fire on board vessel or elsewhere during the welding operations and that the requirements of the Hot Work Permit are met. Provision must be made for the continuance of the precautions until the operations are completed.
4.5.3 Despite clauses 4.5.1 and 4.5.2, the Harbourmaster may exempt from compliance with those provisions the master of a vessel lying at any vessel-repairing establishment.
4.5.4 If in any case the Harbourmaster is not satisfied that adequate precautions have been taken, the Harbourmaster may forbid the operations to be commenced or continued until he or she is so satisfied or has caused such precautions to be taken as he or she thinks necessary.
4.6 Loading or Discharge of Cargo
4.6.1 No person shall discharge, drop, cause or allow to be discharged or dropped, into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters any cargo or anything from a vessel, wharf or land that would or may constitute a danger to navigation safety.
4.6.2 Any person who discharges, drops, causes or allows to be discharged, any cargo or any other material into Hawke’s Bay Regional Council navigable waters that would or may constitute a danger to navigation safety shall be liable for the cost of removal.
4.6.3 Any person handling logs on shore or loading logs onto a vessel in the Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour, shall monitor the operation and immediately identify any logs lost into the water and track them until they have been removed.
4.6.4 Any person handling or loading logs in the Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour must advise Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour Security and the Harbourmaster immediately any logs are lost into the water and again when the logs have been recovered.
5. Administrative Matters
5.1 Revocation of Bylaws
5.1.1 The following bylaws and all amendments to those bylaws in Hawke’s Bay Region, and made under Part VI of the Harbours Act 1950 are revoked.
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Navigation & Safety Bylaws 2007
5.2 Suspensions and exemptions from these bylaws
5.2.1 The Council may, of its own accord or on application by any person, suspend any provision of these bylaws or exempt any activity from any provision of these bylaws. The suspension or exemption may be subject to conditions and have effect for the period of time that the Council considers appropriate. Any suspension or exemption made under this clause must be notified to all interested persons as determined by the Council.
5.3 Application to master/owner
5.3.1 Where any clause in these bylaws imposes an obligation or duty on the master of any vessel, that obligation or duty must, in the case of a vessel that has no master, be performed or carried out by the owner.
5.3.2 Where any clause of these bylaws imposes an obligation or duty on both the master and the owner of a vessel, then, if that clause is not complied with, the master and the owner are deemed severally to have committed an offence against these bylaws. If either the master or the owner complies with any such clause then, for the purposes of these bylaws, compliance by one is deemed to be compliance by the other.
5.4 Vessels to be licensed
5.4.1 The owner of a vessel that is not subject to any Maritime Rule made under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 dealing with the operational management of the vessel must not operate that vessel for hire or reward unless it is licensed by the Harbourmaster.
5.4.2 The Harbourmaster may issue a licence in respect of clause 5.4.1 if, in the opinion of the Harbourmaster, the operation is safe and the vessel is fit for its intended purpose.
5.4.3 The Harbourmaster may issue a licence in respect of clause 5.4.2 if, in the opinion of the Harbourmaster, the operation will not diminish the level of safety for other activities in the vicinity, or cause congestion or jostling for position or other unsafe practices, at points of embarkation/ disembarkation or at any place en route.
5.4.4 Every licence issued by the Harbourmaster under these Bylaws shall apply only to that vessel and operator(s) named in the licence.
5.4.5 Every licence issued by the Harbourmaster must be available for inspection at any time by the Harbourmaster, or enforcement officers or honorary enforcement officers, or any prospective client of the operation.
5.4.6 A licence may be cancelled if its terms and conditions are breached. There will be no refund of fees if a licence is cancelled.
5.4.7 The terms and conditions of any licence issued by Harbourmaster may include, but are not limited to:
(a) defining points of embarkation/ disembarkation
(b) defining the area or route of operations
(c) limiting the number of passengers or quantity of freight
(d) any limitations in respect of weather or operating hours
(e) any requirements for rescue craft
(f) any requirements for safety equipment
(g) the level of instruction to be given to persons hiring a vessel
(h) the qualifications required by the person in charge of the vessel.
5.5 Fees and Charges
Fees and Charges prescribed from time to time by the Council through the Annual Plan process for functions undertaken by the Council under this bylaw shall be paid to the Council on demand. The Council may by Special Order Bylaw process, amend these Bylaws.
Schedule 1: Coastal Waters – Location Specific Information
Location specific schedules and maps for speed upliftings, reserved areas and access lanes in Coastal Waters and associated harbours have been prepared for the following areas (from north to south). Any clauses contained in these schedules shall be read in conjunction with all other clauses in this Bylaw.
S1.1 Whangawehi
The following provisions apply to Whangawehi:
(a) an access lane has been designated for the launching and operation of powered vessel as shown in map 1.1.
S1.2 Mahia Beach
The following provisions apply to Mahia Beach:
(a) An access lane has been designated for the launching and operation of powered vessels as shown in map 1.2, except that no person may propel or navigate a vessel (including a vessel towing a person or some object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots).
Map 1.2 Mahia Beach
S1.3 Waikokopu
The following provisions apply to Waikokopu:
(a) an access lane has been designated for the launching and operation of powered vessel as shown in map 1.3.
Map 1.3 Waikokopu
S1.4 Napier Pilotage Area (as defined in Chart NZ 5612, Napier Roads)
The area comprising all port waters between latitudes 39°25’S and 39°29’S to W of longitude 176°59’E.
1.4.1 General directions for navigating in Napier Pilotage Area as shown in map 1.4:
(a) The Master shall ensure that while within Napier Pilotage Area:
(i) automatic-steering “pilot” devices are not used, unless a helmsman is standing by in the immediate vicinity of the helm or wheel, otherwise the vessel is to be in the hand-steering mode; and
(ii) main engines are immediately available for reducing speed, stopping or going astern at all times without delay; and
(iii) anchors are immediately available for use in an emergency, and capable of being used without power; and
(iv) all information from aids to navigation and charts is fully monitored.
(b) While within Napier Pilotage Area all aids to navigation on board vessels, including but not limited to A.I.S, radar and depth recording devices, are to be in continuous operation and fully utilised.
(c) The number of persons on the bridge of the vessel shall be sufficient to enable compliance with subclause (a) (i).
1.4.2 Duties of persons in charge of motor boats, yachts, launches etc. within Napier Pilotage Area
(a) The Master of every vessel under 500 gross tons must not impede the navigation of any vessel of 500 gross tonnage or more when that vessel is navigating under pilotage within the Napier Pilotage Area.
Map 1.4 Napier Pilotage Area
S1.5 Westshore/inner harbour/Ahuriri/battery road beach
The following provisions apply to the Westshore/Inner Harbor/Ahuriri and Battery Road Beach areas:
(a) Reserved areas have been designated for the operation of personal water craft and swimming as shown in Map 1.5.
(b) Access lanes have been designated for the launching and operation of sail boarders as shown in Map 1.5.
(c) Reserved areas have been designated for surfriding as shown in Map 1.5. Surfriding is defined as the water activity of a single person using a vessel propelled manually or with a paddle and designed for surfriding, to plane down or across the slope of a wave. If any person is using the surfriding reserved area for the purpose for which it is reserved, no person may enter, remain in or use the area for any other purpose.
(d) Users of the Surfriding Reserved Area shall adhere with the WaveRules set out below:
(e) No person shall bathe in the Reserved Areas except where the activity is a necessary part of the activity for which the area is reserved, or the area is not being used for the activity for which the area is reserved.
(f) There shall be no anchoring, set nets, set lines or crayfish pots in any designated access lane or reserved areas or the Inner Harbour and its Approach Channel as shown in map 1.5. except as provided in clause 2.7.5.
(g) There shall be no powered vessels in the Ahuriri Estuary upstream of the Pandora Bridge as shown in map 1.5, except as authorised in the Regional Coastal Plan.
(h) There shall be no kite surfing, paragliding or other activity involving the presence of people/equipment in the air, in the Napier Pilotage Area as shown in map 1.5, unless approved by the Napier Air Traffic Control.
(i) The area designated at Battery Road Beach as shown on map 1.5 is reserved for swimming only. Motorised vessels are not permitted to enter the area between the buoys and the shore at any time, unless authorised by the Harbourmaster or an Enforcement officer.
Map 1.5 Westshore/Inner Harbour/Ahuriri and Battery Road Beach
S1.6 BREAKWATER HARBOUR
The following provisions apply to the Port of Napier Limited Breakwater Harbour:
1.6.1 Radio Clearance Requirements for Breakwater Harbour and Breakwater Harbour
Approach Channels.
(a) At least ten minutes prior to planned departure from, or arrival to, or shift within the Breakwater Harbour, the master of any vessel other than a piloted vessel, shall call “Napier Harbour Radio” on marine VHF radio to report their intentions, and to obtain clearance or otherwise before proceeding.
(b) The Master of any vessel, other than a piloted vessel, shall advise “Napier Harbour Radio” on marine VHF radio when secured at a different berth within the Breakwater harbour.
(c) No vessel other than those approved by Port of Napier Harbour Control shall enter the Breakwater Harbour when a vessel is manoeuvring in the harbour or the approach channel.
(d) VHF radio listening watch shall be kept by all commercial vessels on Channel 16 at all times when under way within the Napier Pilotage Area.
1.6.2 Restricted Activities
(a) There shall be no anchoring, set nets, set lines or crayfish pots in the Breakwater
Harbour and Breakwater Harbour Approach Channels as shown in map 1.6.
Map 1.6 Napier Breakwater Harbour and Approaches.
S1.7 Waimarama Beach
The following provisions apply to Waimarama Beach:
(a) an access lane has been designated for the launching and operation of powered vessel as shown in map 1.7.
Map 1.7 Waimarama Beach
S1.8 KAIRAKAU BEACH
The following provisions apply to Kairakau Beach and Kairakau River:
(a) an access lane has been designated for the launching and operation of powered vessels as shown in map 1.8.
(b) a 5 knot area has been designated on Kairakau River for passive water activities as shown in map 1.8.
(c)
Location specific schedules and maps for inland waters (rivers and lakes) for speed upliftings and reserved areas have been prepared for the following areas (from north to south). Any clauses contained in these schedules shall be read in conjunction with all other clauses in this Bylaw.
S2.1 Wairoa River
The following provisions apply to the Wairoa River from the confluence of the Waiau River to the sea, as shown in map 2.1:
(a) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply except that:
(i)
no person may propel or navigate a vessel (including a vessel towing a person
or some object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots within 5 metres of a river
bank.
Map 2.1 Wairoa River
S2.2 Mohaka River
The following provisions apply to the Mohaka River from Pakatutu Bridge to the sea as shown in map 2.2:
(a)
Map 2.2 Mohaka River
S2.3 Clive and Ngaruroro Rivers
Area A Non- Restricted Area
The following provisions apply to the area from the confluence of the Ngaruroro River with the Clive River, and from the point at which Muddy Creek enters the Clive River to the sea as shown in map 2.3:
(a) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply.
Area B Safety Buffer Area
The following provisions apply to the area from the point at which Muddy Creek enters the Clive River to a line 50 metres upstream of that point as shown in map 2.3:
(a) the use of this area is primarily for the passage of vessels between Areas A and C
(b) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply.
Area C Regulated Area
The following provisions apply to the area of the Clive River from a line 50 metres upstream of the point at which Muddy Creek enters the Clive River to 75 metres downstream of the Clive River Bridge as shown in map 2.3.
(a) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply between the hours of 7.30 a.m. and 8.00 p.m. on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays;
(b) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply between the hours of 12 noon and 8.00 p.m. on Sundays;
(c) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply between the hours of sunrise and 5 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays;
(d) Motorised vessels shall travel in an anti-clockwise direction, keeping the centre clear for non-motorised vessels.
Area D Rowing Area
The following provisions apply to the area of the Clive River upstream of the Clive River Bridge and for a distance of 75 metres downstream of the bridge:
(a) A reserved area for use by non-motorised vessel solely powered manually and associated support vessel (powered or unpowered) as shown in map 2.3.
(b) No person may propel or navigate a powered vessel in the reserved area (including a vessel towing a person or some object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots, except as may be required under (a).
Area E Passive Water Activity Area
The following provisions apply to the Ngaruroro River from its confluence with the Clive River to the SH2 bridge as shown in map 2.3:
(a) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do apply
Area F Shared Area
The following provisions apply to the Ngaruroro River from the confluence of the Taruarau River to the SH 2 Bridge as shown in map 2.3:
(a) speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2 do not apply except that
(i) No person may propel or navigate a vessel (including a vessel towing a person or some object) at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots during the months of May and June (duck shooting season) and 15 August to 30 November (inclusive) (white-baiting season) from the SH 2 bridge to the Chesterhope Bridge.
S2.4 Porangahau River
S2.4 Porangahau River
The following provisions apply to the Porangahau River:
(a) Speed restrictions specified in clause 3.2.1 (a) and (b) do not apply to the Porangahau River.
(b) A reserved area has been designated for bathing from 30 metres downstream of the Beach Road bridge on the northern bank and out to a line parallel with the second bridge pier from the waters edge, and upstream of the bridge from the second bridge pier to the shore 50 metres upstream of the bridge as shown on Map2.4. Vessels are prohibited from entering this area unless authorized by the Harbourmaster.
(c) Water skiers towed by boat or jetski may pass the bathing reserved area only through the middle of the centre bridge span having due regard for bathers at all times.
(d) Jet skiing is only permitted from 30 metres downstream of the Beach Road bridge to the sea as shown in map 2.4.
(e) Vessel’s may only be launched from the shore 30 metres downstream of the Beach Road bridge or other areas outside of the reserved bathing area.
Map 2.4 Porangahau River
S2.5 Te Paerahi Beach
The following provisions apply to Te Paerahi Beach as shown on map 2.5
An area has been designated for mixed bathing and surfing extending from a position 20 metres north of the changing sheds for a distance of 200 metres to the south and extending 200 metres out to sea from MLWS as shown on map 2.5. Launching, retrieving and navigating of vessels are prohibited in this area at all times unless authorised by the Harbourmaster. Vehicles traversing this area on the beach must not exceed 5 kilometres an hour at any time.
Map 2.5 Te Paerahi Beach
S2.6 General provision for rivers with speed upliftings
Any person who is permitted to propel or navigate a vessel at a proper speed exceeding 5 knots as a result of a speed uplifting specified in Clauses 2.1 to 2.4 shall not do so in a manner that is likely to endanger or unduly annoy any person who is:
(a) on, in or using the water; or
(b) fishing or undertaking recreational activity in the vicinity of the vessel.
S2.7 River Safety Rules
Any person in charge of a vessel on a river must:
(a) ensure that the vessel keeps to the starboard (right) side of the river channel; and
(b) if going upstream, give way to any vessel coming downstream; and
(c) not operate the vessel unless river and weather conditions permit safe operation of the vessel.
Schedule 3: OIL TRANSFERS
Bulk Oil Discharges
(a) Bulk oil discharges are permitted only at such wharf or place as specified for bulk oil discharges, or as otherwise permitted in writing by the Harbourmaster.
Advice Note:
Diesel oil may be transferred at all locations within Port of Napier Ltd ,Napier Inner Harbour and other coastal locations providing that the operators adhere to their Site Marine Oil Spill (Tier 1) Contingency Plan, as required under Marine Protection Rule Part 130B.
|
SCHEDULE 4: HOT WORK PERMIT
A Hot Work Permit shall be in the form specified below:
harbour master’s office
breakwater road- napier
fax/tel(06) 833-4525
mobile: 0274 455 592
Email:harbourmaster@hbrc.govt.nz
Hot Work Permit
Not for use on Tankers/ Pipeline
Permit No…..
Under Section 4 Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Navigation Safety Bylaws 2012, permission is hereby given for Gas Cutting /Burning/ Welding (electric/gas) to be carried out in the said locations:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………on board vessel ...............................................................................at Berth…………………………………….......................Port of Napier
subject to the following conditions:
1. All combustible materials within surrounding area removed or made safe.
2. No flammable liquids, vapours, gases or dusts present.
3. Suitable fire extinguishers/hoses provide onsite and fully operation.
4. Operator knows how to use fire equipment.
5. Operator knows how and where to raise alarm.
6. An inspection of the surroundings of the work area/s is carried out at least one hour after hot work is completed
7. Other specified conditions:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Gas Free Certificate Yes/No Issued by:……………………................................................................................................
I/We agree with the above conditions and will ensure that they are complied with for the duration of this permit.
Signed:
For the vessel …………………………………Position………………………………………………………………………..Date………..
For the contractor…………………………….. Position……………………………………………………………………….Date………..
Permit issued by……………………………… Position……………………………………………………………………….Date………..
This permit is valid from……………Hrs Date………..until Hrs………………………………………………………………….Date………..
This permit must be displayed at the work area.
If more than one work area, original to be kept in ship’s office / wheelhouse and a duplicate copy to be displayed at each work area.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREEN: Contractor’s copy- BLUE: Ship’s copy- WHITE: Harbourmaster’s copy- PINK: Marine Operations copy
Wednesday 23 November 2011
Subject: November 2011 Work Plan - Looking Forward
Reason for Report
1. This report is provided in order to update Councillors about significant work activities under way over the next month in each area of Council.
Group |
Area of Activity |
Activity Status Update |
Asset Management |
· Asset Management Plan reviews |
Reviews of Asset Management Plans substantially complete for HPFCS and UTTS. Currently being peer reviewed. AMPs for small schemes to be done. |
|
· Biosecurity |
Draft proposed strategy to be publicly notified. |
|
· Land Management |
A number of strategies to improve effectiveness of Council land management investment being developed for Council Ten Year Plan consideration. |
|
· CHB District Council Wastewater project |
Consent application lodged. Application expected to be notified at end of November once peer review completed. A report from NIWA is also expected end of November which will form part of application documents. |
|
· Mahia Beach wastewater project |
Legal agreement being negotiated with Wairoa District Council for discharge of wastewater onto forest block and specific responsibilities for a range of access issues. |
|
· Tangoio and Tutira |
Recreational plan for area being developed. Concept plan to be presented to Council in November for consideration. Contractual arrangements for high UMF Manuka block being negotiated. |
|
· Staff Accommodation |
On hold pending further discussions with stakeholders. |
|
· Gisborne District Council |
The provision of river engineering services to Gisborne District Council commenced. Additional engineer has been employed to support this work. A programme of work is to be developed with GDC end of November. |
Resource Management
|
· Appeal mediation processes underway for: |
Twyford Court appointed mediation held on 2 November, attended by the appellants (Watering Society) HBRC, Fish and Game, DOC, and Te Taiwhenua of Heretaunga. Appellants advised that a report is being prepared for them by Aqualinc, but will not be ready until next year. Appellants will advise the Court before April 2012 if they intend to progress the appeals. AFFCO Further work and discussion is still ongoing, further mediation dates to be set by Court in New Year if required. Mexted & Williams Mexted et al have proposed a reduced no of lots as a solution to resolve the appeal. This is awaiting a response from the appellants. If not accepted this will go to appeal. |
|
· Science Activities |
Groundwater Ruataniwha scenario modelling underway to inform pan change and storage projects. Work coupling groundwater model with nutrient model (NIWA) is also progressing. Additional resourcing to meet timelines and ensure robustness of process has occurred. Heretaunga model development is being fully scoped, it is expected that the full transient model with scenario modelling will take 2 ˝ years Surface Water Allocation modelling for plan change and storage project still progressing with issues around back editing of data being resolved to ensure robust data quality. IFIM assistance on Makaroro and preliminary work for Tutaekuri underway. Ecology Terrestrial surveys for strategic plan development and to inform future integrated management completed for Karamu and Tukituki, with reports in draft form. Work will progress on the Ngaruroro this summer. |
Strategic Development |
· Development of the Land and Water Management Strategy with input from the Reference Group. |
Periphyton modelling by NIWA is progressing well with the model now developed; validation and use of model will progress over the next two months. Surveys will start shortly on the Tukituki and Mohaka characterising the longitudinal change in biota as part5 of the plan change limit setting process and to ensure effects based decisions can be made. Air Quality Now that Winter is over a relocation of two air quality instruments will occur to ensure airsheds are better represented (Awatoto and Whirinaki airsheds ). |
|
· Drafting of plan change for freshwater management in Tukituki River catchment. |
Ongoing. Technical reports being used to develop the water allocation framework. |
|
· Schedule 1 RMA process for Variation 1 (Rivermouth Hazard Areas) to proposed Regional Coastal Environment Plan -officers’ report being prepared. |
Hearing to be scheduled early 2012. |
|
· Schedule 1 RMA process for Onsite Wastewater change, plus subsequent hearing process. |
Hearing to be scheduled early 2012. |
|
· RPS Change to incorporate HPUDS and wider infrastructure matters. |
Proposed change to be adopted by the Council at its meeting on 23 November 2011. If adopted, to be notified in December with a mid to late February end of submission date. |
|
Taharua Strategy and plan change. |
Ongoing. Comprehensive work programme on way forward for a robust plan change to be presented to Committee in Feb 2012. |
|
· Appeals against Change 2 (Air Quality) all settled without need for any Court hearings. |
See report to 23 Nov Council meeting recommending approval of Change 2 and operative date as 1 Jan 2012. |
|
Negotiations on appeals against coastal plan nearing total settlement without need for any Court hearings. |
Ongoing. Update report to Environmental Management Committee in early 2012. |
|
Implementation of Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (HPUDS) as it relates to other actions where HBRC is a lead agency or a partner agency. |
Ongoing via HPUDS Implementation Working Party |
Strategic Development |
Regional Land Transport Programme and Regional Land Transport Strategy. |
A report on the revised project/programme prioritisation will be considered by the RTC in late November. |
|
Business Hawke’s Bay |
Business attraction and growth initiatives are ongoing. Resource to progress China market opportunities is to be contracted. Ongoing discussions with sector groups to re-establish Food Hub programme. |
|
Tech NZ R&D funding as part of the Regional Business Partner partnership with HB Chamber of Commerce |
Ongoing - $973,365 distributed to 17 companies, 10 of which are in the primary industries and food and beverage sector |
|
Strategic Farming Initiative |
A collaborative initiative to provide sustainable economic growth continues to be scoped with industry support – paper to be prepared for December Council meeting. |
|
Massey Strategic Relationship |
The Massey leadership team are holding their retreat in Hawke’s Bay in late January and an event is being planned at the end of the Council meeting on 25th involving HBRC Councillors and several key staff along with Mayors and Deputies from other Councils. |
Corporate Services |
· Assessment of selling cash flows from Napier leasehold land. |
To be undertaken in April 2012. |
|
· Establishment of Investment Company & Board composition. |
For Council approval at 14 December 2011 meeting. |
External Relations |
· Freshwater Governance and Management – Collaborative sector approach to Implementation of NPS |
Ongoing work focusing on engagement of Regional Sector Group with re-established Land and Water Forum. |
|
· Discussions with Treaty claimant groups on development of Regional Planning Committee Terms of Reference |
Terms of Reference for Regional Planning Committee adopted by Council in September. Nominations for membership being sought for reporting to Council in December. |
External Relations |
· Long Term Plan |
Work on development of Long-Term Plan consultation process |
|
· Shared Services |
Ongoing work to develop proposal(s) for Council consideration. |
Operations/ Water Group |
· Ruataniwha Water storage |
Work over the next month involves: - Reviewing initial project description and refining detail for sections to be completed by March project description deadline - Site investigation drilling and geotechnical work completed with final report due 17 November 2011. - All environmental work programmes are proceeding in accordance with programme and budget. 5 remaining non science work programmes have been tendered out with consultants to be confirmed by 25 November. Significant effort is going into the land use intensification project at present with existing and proposed landuse models being developed. - Engage legal advisor for RMA and consents advice. - Stakeholder and leadership meetings to host. |
Operations/ Water Group |
· Cycleways |
Work continues on the various rides with progress as follows: · Landscapes- HDC work on Red bridge section ongoing. River road section complete. Craggy Range winery section to complete in conjunction with HDC. · Water – Work has been completed for the major section through DOC/Airport and Landcorp land. The Taipo stopbank section is being temporarily prepared to allow use, until stopbank reconstruction works can be confirmed and programmed. An initial response to the pistol club issue has been received with further decisions and negotiations required to progress this matter. The Puketapu ride works are progressing with work expected to be completed by Xmas. NCC are developing contracts for the Church road and Green Arena sections of works. · Winery – Work is progressing well on the Expressway to Fernhill section on the Ngaruroro Stopbank. Detail for the Royshill/ Ngatarawa section is being finalised this month. |
|
· Ngaruroro Water storage project |
Final Pre Feasibility report now complete. An option for the On farm Economic Analysis is to be confirmed by the end of the month and will seek Council guidance on funding (for completion by March 2012), prior to seeking Council direction as to whether this project moves to a full feasibility study. |
CE’s Office |
Strategic Plan |
The Strategic Plan was adopted by the Council in September. Minor amendments have since been following the Council workshop on 13 October. The Strategic Plan is now being published and will be sent to stakeholders in the week beginning 21 November. Meetings will be arranged with key stakeholders and an invitation will be extended to other stakeholders for Council to meet with them. |
|
Freshwater Governance and Management |
Sector workshops on allocation, limit setting and regulatory agility aligned with NPS are ongoing |
|
Represent Regional Sector on Land and Water Forum “Small Group” |
Meeting held in Wellington on 15 November |
|
Treaty Settlements – further work with Claimant Groups |
Ongoing Regional Planning Committee Terms of Reference done for sign off |
|
Investment Portfolio scenarios – further development of detailed business cases for 10 Year Plan. |
November |
|
Ongoing engagement in regional water strategy and Water storage feasibility projects |
Ongoing |
|
Commence work with TLA CEs on Study of Local Government Efficiency and Effectiveness |
Funding approved by councils, meeting of leaders to define the Terms of Reference for the studies scheduled 28 November. |
|
Continue work with Regional Sector CEs at Horizons and Greater Wellington plus Government Department CEs as appropriate on southern North Island partnership |
Meeting held on 4 October with CEs of Horizons and Greater Wellington and Director General of DoC |
CE’s Office |
Finalise Shared Services paper with Peter Winder |
Council to consider the findings of the Shared Services report, and take part in appropriate discussions with Hawke’s Bay TAs and Horizons Regional Council. |
|
Continue involvement with Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Peak Group for Implementation of the ETS |
Ongoing |
|
Attend the Advisory Committee on Official Statistics |
Attended first Advisory Committee meeting held 16 November 2011 |
Decision Making Process
2. Council is required to make a decision in accordance with Part 6 Sub-Part 1, of the Local Government Act 2002 (the Act). Staff have assessed the requirements contained within this section of the Act in relation to this item and have concluded that, as this report is for information only and no decision is to be made, the decision making provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 do not apply.
1. That Council receives the November 2011 Work Plan Looking Forward report. |
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
SUBJECT: General Business
INTRODUCTION:
This document has been prepared to assist Councillors note the General Business to be discussed as determined earlier in Agenda Item 6.
Item |
Topic |
Councillor / Staff |
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|
Wednesday 23 November 2011
SUBJECT: Port of Napier Limited (PONL) - (1) Resolutions for 23rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Results to 30 September 2011; (2) Statement of Corporate Intent 2011-2014
That Council excludes the public from this section of the meeting, being Agenda Item 18 Port of Napier Limited (PONL) - (1) Resolutions for 23rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Results to 30 September 2011; (2) Statement of Corporate Intent 2011-2014 with the general subject of the item to be considered while the public is excluded; the reasons for passing the resolution and the specific grounds under Section 48 (1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution being as follows:
GENERAL SUBJECT OF THE ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED |
REASON FOR PASSING THIS RESOLUTION |
GROUNDS UNDER SECTION 48(1) FOR THE PASSING OF THE RESOLUTION |
Port of Napier Limited (PONL) - (1) Resolutions for 23rd Annual General Meeting (AGM) and Results to 30 September 2011; (2) Statement of Corporate Intent 2011-2014 |
7(2)(b)(ii) That the public conduct of this agenda item would be likely to result in the disclosure of information where the withholding of that information is necessary to protect information which otherwise would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied or who is the subject of the information. |
The Council is specified, in the First Schedule to this Act, as a body to which the Act applies. |
Paul Drury Group Manager Corporate Services |
Andrew Newman Chief Executive |
Wednesday 23 November 2011
SUBJECT: Public Excluded Recommendations from the Asset Management and Biosecurity Committee
That Council excludes the public from this section of the meeting, being Agenda Item 19 Public Excluded Recommendations from the Asset Management and Biosecurity Committee with the general subject of the item to be considered while the public is excluded; the reasons for passing the resolution and the specific grounds under Section 48 (1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution being as follows:
GENERAL SUBJECT OF THE ITEM TO BE CONSIDERED |
REASON FOR PASSING THIS RESOLUTION |
GROUNDS UNDER SECTION 48(1) FOR THE PASSING OF THE RESOLUTION |
Public Excluded Recommendations from the Asset Management and Biosecurity Committee |
7(2)(i) That the public conduct of this agenda item would be likely to result in the disclosure of information where the withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority holding the information to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). |
The Council is specified, in the First Schedule to this Act, as a body to which the Act applies. |
Mike Adye Group Manager Asset Management |
|