|
Mrs Gilbertson
advised the Committee on the process for hearing the verbal submissions,
making recommendations on the submissions and any consequential changes that
could result to the draft RLTS/RLTP following the hearing of submissions.
Mrs Gilbertson
also advised that a revised RLTS/RLTP which would include any changes
required through the submission process would be presented to the Regional
Transport Committee on 22 June and will then be referred to the Regional Council
on 27 June for adoption.
The Committee commenced hearing verbal
submissions.
Submitter 24 – Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited
Lyn O’Neill
The submitter confirmed Fonterra’s support for the
short term focus on completing key elements to the roading network as the
submitter relies heavily on local roads being continually maintained in order
to alleviate any safety risks for its drivers and other road users.
The submitter explained the strategic approach
Fonterra would continue to take in the future and this would result in
increased vehicle movements and on farm management. Global sustainability
was also a key strategic goal.
Responding to questions from the Committee, the submitter
confirmed that:
·
Fonterra was still reliant on local roads in
the area however rail is used in many areas of the country;
·
Product would be shifted elsewhere as it was
unlikely that industry would be set up in the region;
·
Always interested in having discussions with TAs
in order to pursue Fonterra’s strategic direction.
Submitter 5 – Barry Crabbe
The submitter gave his support for the use of HPMV
trucks on suitable arterial routes within the region; requested
consideration be given to rail services be introduced between Eskdale and
Paki Paki and also requested that consideration be given to closing off
Farndon Road for the use of heavy traffic which would alleviate heavy
vehicles using Marine Parade.
The submitter also gave his support for the
continued use of rail.
Submitter 4 - Citizens Environmental Advocacy Centre Incorporated
Ken Crispin
The submitter expressed concern about the
environmental impacts that increased heavy vehicle numbers were having on the
region’s roads, saying it was imperative that rail services remained in the
region as this would reduce the damage which currently occurs on some of the
region’s roads.
Dr Jones requested further information on recently
recorded noise levels undertaken by CEAC.
Submitter 9 – Dr Robin Gwynn
The submitter expressed concern that the Strategy
which covers a 30 year timeframe did not contain an analysis of the fuel assumptions
on which the conclusions had been drawn, there was a lack of discussion
around rail and no evidence of the emerging global trends in relation to car
usage and fuel costs in a post peak oil environment.
The submitter requested that the Committee view the
“Bolland” report in relation to the modelling undertaken on oil prices in
2020.
The submitter congratulated the Committee on the
strategic significance of the Port outlined in the Strategy but said the rail
corridor between Napier and Gisborne was also of strategic significance for Hawke’s
Bay and Gisborne regions.
Responding to questions from the Committee, Dr
Gwynn commented that it was impossible to look a decade out without taking
into account what may happen with fuel prices and he was confident that
biotech technology for vehicles would be implemented in the future.
Submitter 14 – Hawke’s Bay District Health Board
Dr Nick Jones
The submitter requested an amendment to the
statement on Public Health (4.1.5) and replace the word ‘opportunities’ with
“promote” to be more in keeping with the DHB’s core function and the
inclusion of an additional principle of “equity” under Section 4.3
(Principles) of the Strategy.
Responding to a question, Dr Jones agreed that well
designed roading networks do give an opportunity to improve health and recent
MOT figures have indicated that one of the positive benefits has been to
health.
The submitter also confirmed that HBDHB does work closely with
Sports Hawke’s Bay.
The Committee commenced consideration of submissions received.
Submitter 1 – Roark Watson
The Committee noted that the submitter was concerned
with traffic congestion at intersections linking Pakowhai Road, Ruahapia Road
and Farndon Road and offered suggestions for improved road links into Napier.
The Committee acknowledged that the proposed link
from SH2 to the expressway via Awatoto was in a greenfields area which was
very low lying and a large investment in pumping systems would be required.
Resolution:
That Mr Watson be thanked for his submission and be
advised, based on the comments made, that no change is to be made to the RLTS.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 2 – Roark Watson
The Committee noted the submitter’s request to
rename the Pacific Coast Highway to “The First Light (Pacific) Highway and
agreed that the request be forwarded to Hawke’s Bay Tourism for their
consideration.
Resolution:
That Mr Watson be thanked for his submission and be
advised, based on the comments made, that no change is to be made to the RLTS
but that his suggestion would be forwarded to Hawke’s Bay Tourism for their
consideration.
Remmerswaal/Clews
CARRIED
Submitter 3 – Harvey Norman Properties (NZ Ltd and Harvey Norman
Leasing (NZ) Ltd (Laura Swan)
The Committee noted the submitter’s support for the initiatives to
improve the transportation network provided there were no adverse affects on
their activities on their sites in Hastings.
Resolution:
That Laura Swan, representing Harvey Norman
Properties Ltd be thanked for their submission and be advised, based on the
comments made, that no change needs to be made to the RLTS however their
submission will be formally referred to Hastings District Council for their
consideration.
Clews/Kingston
CARRIED
Submitter 6 – Port of Napier Limited
The Committee acknowledged the submitter’s support of the
Strategy.
Resolution:
That Mr Cowie and the Port of Napier Limited be
thanked for the submission and support and be advised, based on the comments
made, that no change needs to be made to the RLTS.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 7 – Hawke’s Bay Chamber of Commerce
The submitter’s support of the Strategy and the
suggestion that as the airport could expand in the future means of access
needed to be factored into the Strategy was noted by the Committee.
The Committee discussed the submission and the comments made by
NZTA.
The meeting adjourned at 11.55am and reconvened at 12.45pm
Mr Mohi joined the meeting.
The Committee continued to hear verbal submissions
Submitter 17 – Pan Pac
Mr Brett Gilmore
The submitter strongly supported the draft RLTS and noted that the
vision and key outcomes will help future proof the region’s network. The
submitter also supported the HPMV initiative and advised that Pan Pac is
already running this type of vehicle to the Port which is already reducing
heavy truck numbers on the roads. The submitter advised however productivity
could be increased further if bridges in the region were able to carry HPMV vehicles.
Responding to a question, Mr Gilmore confirmed that rail services
from Pan Pac could not be used as there was no siding at the factory site.
Issues around noise would also be a concern.
Submitter 20 –
EF Hill (Ted)
The submitter described his vision for a rail-free city
environment for both Napier and Hastings which would assist in a more
prosperous and pleasant living for the community.
The submitter expressed concern about the unavailability of the
SH5 Mohaka Bridge in the event of an emergency and the lack of contingency
plans in place.
Submitter 21 –
Napier Heavy Traffic Community Forum
Mr Les Hewett
The submitter expressed strong concern about the environmental
impacts, particularly noise and emissions from vehicles travelling the main
arterial routes, on the community and the difficulties that may be
experienced following the introduction of four laning of Prebensen Drive.
The submitter suggested that in order to alleviate some noise,
that main arterial routes be paved with a noise reduction surface.
Clarification regarding the plans for four laning of Prebensen
Drive were outlined to the submitter.
Submitter 29 –
Richard Barfoot
The submitter congratulated the Committee on a comprehensive draft
RLTS and its stance in relation to the Napier to Gisborne rail line.
The submitter suggested that in order to alleviate truck numbers
travelling down Marine Parade, consideration should be given to closing off
the right hand turn from Pakowhai Road onto Farndon road to all heavy
vehicles. The trucking industry should have restraints and dis-incentives
placed onto them for using the coastal route.
Submitter 30 – Jim Haliburton
Mr Haliburton presented his submission which included a
suggestion that barges could be used up and down the coast using the
available bays with the barges being able to load directly onto log ships. The
submitter also suggested two new projects on SH2 north of Napier which could result
in savings in travel time, freight and transport costs and ongoing
maintenance costs on SH2 to Wairoa.
Submitter 25 – Wairoa District Council
Mr Jamie Cox
The submitter sought to include “tourism” as a strategic focus within
the Strategy and suggested it be included in the “Our Future” section.
Councillor Little left the meeting at 1.50pm
RTC29/12 Resolution:
That Mr J Cox be appointed as a member of the
Regional Transport Committee of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council for the
meeting of Friday, 08 June 2012 as short term replacement on the Committee
for Councillor C Little.
Kingston/Hart
CARRIED
Mrs Gilbertson
advised that the Transport Advisory Group (TAG) had met during the lunch
break and had reached unanimous agreement on the wording of responses to the
submitters to reiterate the priority of projects adopted by the RTC. There
was also acknowledgement by TAG that if further projects needed to be
included in the RLTP, and the projects were of strategic importance to the
region, these projects could be included, if the RTC agreed. It was further
agreed that all responses to submitters would be reviewed by TAG members
before being signed by the RTC Chairman on behalf of the Committee.
The Committee recommenced consideration of submissions.
Submitter 7 – Chamber of Commerce
The Committee continued to discuss the submission,
in particular the advantages of the HPMV projects. The requirement for a
project to be listed in the Strategy, was noted so that if funding did
become available the project must be listed in the RLTP before it could be
considered.
Resolution:
1.
That the Hawke’s Bay Chamber of Commerce be
thanked for their submission and support and that, based on the comments
made, that an amendment will be made to the RLTS/RLTP to include, in the summary
of medium term projects, likely HPMV projects; and a further reference to
HPMV will be included in the “targets” section of the document.
2.
And be further advised that an amendment will
be made to the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal
transport options, in particular the use of rail as a freight transport
alternative both north and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the
RTC’s advocacy position in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and
desire to ensure the continuation of rail services across the region.
Hart/Kingston
CARRIED
Submitter 8 – HB Fruitgrower’s Association
The Committee noted that the submission was in fully support of
the strategy and the RLTP.
Resolution:
That the Hawke’s Bay Fruitgrower’s Association be thanked for the
submission and support and be advised that no change needs to be made to the
RLTS or RLTP.
Hart/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 9 – Dr R Gwynn
Mr Buchanan
clarified the reasons the strategy did not include forecasts of fuel prices.
Following further discussion, the Committee agreed that amendments would be
included in the Strategy which would provide for issues such as fuel costs
and other associated probabilities.
The Committee also noted the submitter’s comments about KiwiRail
and his support for the line to remain open.
Resolution:
1. That Dr Gwynn be thanked for his submission and be advised
that an amendment will be made to the RLTS to take account of issues such as
fuel cost and other associated probabilities.
Kingston/Cox
CARRIED
2. That Dr Gwynn be advised that an amendment
will be made to the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal
transport options, in particular the use of rail as a freight transport
alternative both north and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s
advocacy position in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire
to ensure the continuation of rail services across the region.
Dick/Kingston
CARRIED
Submitter 10 – Mr David Webster
The submitter was in favour of the retention of the
rail line from Palmerston North through to Gisborne and suggested that more
forestry product could be carried from Napier to Gisborne along with a
suitable train for tourism purposes.
The submitter expressed concern that a 30 year
strategy has to allow for many eventualities and queried the lack of
attention to this contained within the Strategy.
Resolution:
1.
That Mr David Webster be thanked for his
submission and be advised that an amendment will be made to the RLTS to make
reference to the provision of multi-modal transport options, in particular
the use of rail as a freight transport alternative both north and south of
the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s advocacy position in relation
to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire to ensure the continuation of
rail services across the region.
Remmerswaal/Hart
CARRIED
Submitter 11 – Transport Advisory Group (TAG)
The TAG submission sought RTC approval to make
minor changes to the document following advice from Mr Barry Mein, RLTS
Auditor and issues arising during the public consultation phase of the
Strategy. It was noted that a Targets section would also be included in the
document along with a new table to Appendix D outlining how the RLTS aligns with
sections 75,76 and 77 of the LTMA.
Resolution:
That the RTC agree to all necessary editorial and
formatting changes being made to the document; and following the TAG submission,
noting that a revised targets and measures section would be inserted into the
final RLTS.
Hart/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 12 – Mr Mac Kirkwood
The submitter supported an integrated transport
system that uses the region’s strategic assets , cycling and cycleways but
expressed concern about the movement of HPMVs in the region which may have
impacts on roads, motorists and communities.
The Committee acknowledged the support of the
submitter on the work undertaken by TAs and the Regional Council with the
cycleway projects.
Resolution:
1. That Mr M Kirkwood be thanked for the
submission and support for the cycling initiatives of Hastings, Napier and
the Regional Council; and be advised that an amendment will be made to the
RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal transport options, in
particular the use of rail as a freight transport alternative both north and
south of the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s advocacy position in
relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire to ensure the
continuation of rail services across the region.
Cox/Kingston
CARRIED
Submitter 13 – Karamu Enhancement Group (KEG)
Mr Mac Kirkwood
The submitter supported the approach of the RLTS to
walking and cycling and was looking forward to the inclusion of a walkway and
cycleway in the Te Karamu stretch.
Resolution:
That the Karamu Enhancement Group be thanked for
the submission and support for the strategies approach to cycling activities
and current cycling initiatives in the region, and be advised that no change needs
to be made to the RLTS.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 14 – Hawke’s Bay District Health Board
Dr Nick Jones
Resolution:
That the Hawke’s Bay District Health Board be
thanked for the submission and be advised, based on the comments made, that
reference to “equity” issues will be included in the explanation of the aim
for “Access and Mobility” in the RLTS.
Remmerswaal/Hart
CARRIED
Submitter 15 – Ngati Kahungunu Iwi Incorporated - Mr Morry Black
The Committee noted the submitter had several concerns with the
RLTS, the importance of correct information to be included in the Strategy
and the need for ongoing consultation with Maori.
The submitter was in support of retaining the rail link stating
that it appeared to be a better option for catering for any increase in
freight volumes.
Resolution:
1.
That Ngati Kahungunu Iwi Incorporated be
thanked for the submission and be advised that an amendment will be made to
the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal transport options,
in particular the use of rail as a freight transport alternative both north
and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s advocacy position
in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire to ensure the
continuation of rail services across the region.
Kingston/Remmerswaal
CARRIED
Submitter 16 – Central Hawke’s Bay District Council
The submitter supported the majority of key
projects included in the RLTS/RLTP in relation to improved access to
processing industry and the Port of Napier.
The submitter expressed concern about two risk
areas on SH2 and noted that now SH2 has been classified as a National
Strategic Highway, it was imperative that the two projects be moved to the
top of the list for 2012.
The submitter requested that traffic flows be
monitored along SH2 around Te Mahanga and Otane with the uptake of logging
continuing in the area and the proposed irrigation scheme in the area.
Resolution:
That CHBDC be thanked for their submission and be
advised that no change needs to be made the RLTS or RLTP.
Schwass/Clews
CARRIED
Submitter 17 – Pan Pac
The Committee noted the support of the submitter
for the Strategy and in particular the development of more HPMV routes.
Resolution:
That Pan Pac be thanked for their submission and be
advised, based on the comments made, that an amendment will be made to the
RLTS/RLTP to include, in the summary of medium term projects, likely HPMV
projects; and a further reference to HPMV will be included in the “targets”
section of the document.
Hart/Kingston
CARRIED
Submitter 18 – Audrey Jones
The submitter expressed concern that SH38 was still
not totally sealed after funding was allocated in 2001 and then withdrawn.
Environmental effects were also noted.
Resolution:
That Audrey Jones be thanked for her submission and be advised,
based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made to the RLTS or
RLTP.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 19 – New Zealand Transport Agency
The submitter requested further detail be included in Section
4.4.6 “Corridor Studies” to encompass NZTA’s approach to one network and to
highlight that the Strategy would be developed collaboratively with key
stakeholders, TAs and NZTA.
Resolution:
That NZTA be thanked for their submission and be advised, based on
the comments made, that the RLTS is to be modified to include further
reference to corridor studies where suitable information is available; and to
include appropriate reference to investigating and implementing a “one
network” approach within the region (with wording provided by NZTA).
Clews/Remmerswaal
CARRIED
Submitter 20 – EF Hill (Ted)
The Committee requested that the submitter be
advised of Council’s Lifelines procedures in the event of an emergency.
Resolution:
That Ted Hill be thanked for his submission and be
advised, and based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made to
the RLTS.
Schwass/Cox
CARRIED
Submitter 21 – Napier Heavy Traffic Community Forum - Mr Les
Hewett
The Committee noted the submitter’s concerns around
environmental impacts as a result of increased traffic volumes and agreed
that noise issues are a community concern and should be brought to the RTC at
any time.
The Committee discussed the need for mitigation
methods for the environmental impacts to be included in the Environmental
Section of the Strategy.
Resolution:
1.
That Mr Les Hewett - Napier Heavy traffic
Community Forum Committee be thanked for the submission and, based on the
comments made, be advised that an amendment will be made to the RLTS to make
reference to the provision of multi-modal transport options, in particular
the use of rail as a freight transport alternative both north and south of
the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s advocacy position in relation
to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire to ensure the continuation of
rail services across the region.
2.
And further be advised that a statement will
be included in the RLTS to strengthen the wording around mitigation of noise
as an environmental impact.
Kingston/Hart
CARRIED
Submitter 22 - Jenny Baker
The submitter requested that the Strategy should include reference
to carbon emissions, oil based and alternative fuels. A further request to
place more emphasis on safe commuter routes for cyclists rather than tourist
routes was also made.
The Committee noted that the submitter also supported the
retention of the rail service between Napier and Gisborne.
The Committee discussed Hastings District Council’s project “I Ways”
and the Kyoto emissions standards and agreed that amendments would be made to
the Strategy to include the submitter’s suggestions around fuel and cycling
projects.
Resolution:
1.
That Jenny Baker be thanked for her
submission and be advised, based on the comments made, that the RLTS is to be
modified to include further reference in the issues section to the
supply/cost of fuel, reducing carbon emissions, along with a re worded challenge
as noted above.
2.
And be further advised that an amendment will
be made to the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal
transport options, in particular the use of rail as a freight transport
alternative both north and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the
RTC’s advocacy position in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and
desire to ensure the continuation of rail services across the region.
Kingston/Clews
CARRIED
Submitter 23 – Murray Deakin
The submitter expressed concern that SH38 was still
not totally sealed after funding was allocated in 2001 and then withdrawn.
Environmental effects were also noted.
Resolution:
That Murray Deakin be thanked for his submission and be advised,
based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made to the RLTS or
RLTP.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 24 – Fonterra - Lyn O’Neil
The Committee discussed the points made by the submitter and
agreed a response would be given regarding HPMV routes.
Resolution:
That Fonterra be thanked for the submission, be advised, based on
comments and discussion, a response on specific queries about HPMV would be
forthcoming but no change is to be made to the RLTS or RLTP.
Hart/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter
25 – Wairoa District Council - Jamie Cox
The Committee commended the submitter on his submission and agreed
that further information on existing activities in the tourism area would be
included in the Strategy.
Resolution:
That Wairoa District Council be thanked for the submission, and be
advised, based on the comments made, that changes will be made to the RLTS so
as to a) provide information on tourism in the region at present and in the
future and b) set out an issue and challenge statement for tourism.
Kingston/Hart
CARRIED
Submitter
26 – Federated Farmers
The Committee noted that the submitter encouraged ongoing
discussions around the levels of service and the prioritisation of roading as
farmers have a large input to costs to maintain the roading network.
The submitter was in support of the Whakatu Arterial link, the
Pakowhai and Links Road intersection and the retention of the Napier to
Gisborne rail link.
The submitter also supported the provision of a stock effluent
facility on the Napier to Wairoa highway as well as facilities at other sites
on the network. The submitter questioned the omission of a facility south of
Hastings.
Following discussion, the Committee agreed a response outlining
detail on stock effluent facilities in the region would be forwarded to the
submitter. This included referencing the construction of a facility between
Napier and Wairoa in Year 4 of the RLTP.
Resolution:
1. That Federated Farmers be thanked for the
submission and be advised, that based on the comments made, an amendment will
be made to the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal
transport options, in particular the use of rail as a freight transport
alternative both north and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the
RTC’s advocacy position in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire
to ensure the continuation of rail services across the region.
Cox/Remmerswaal
CARRIED
Submitter
27- Neal Taylor
The submitter expressed concern that SH38 was still
not totally sealed after funding was allocated in 2001 and then withdrawn.
Environmental effects were also noted.
Resolution:
That Neal Taylor be thanked for his submission and
be advised, based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made to
the RLTS or RLTP.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter
28 – Colin Macdonald
The submitter expressed concern that SH38 was still
not totally sealed after funding was allocated in 2001 and then withdrawn.
Environmental effects were also noted.
Resolution:
That Colin Macdonald be thanked for his submission
and be advised, based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made
to the RLTS or RLTP.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter
29 – Richard Barfoot
The Committee noted that the submitter supported the approach for
rail as outlined in the strategy and the retention of the Napier to Gisborne rail
line.
The Committee discussed the submitter’s suggestion that all heavy
vehicles be diverted from accessing Marine Parade at the Farndon
Road/Pakowhai Rd turnoff and agreed to forward the submitter’s suggestion to
Hastings District Council for consideration.
Resolution:
1.
That Richard Barfoot be thanked for the
submission and be advised, based on the comments made, that an amendment will
be made to the RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal
transport options, in particular the use of rail as a freight transport
alternative both north and south of the region; and secondly to reflect the
RTC’s advocacy position in relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and
desire to ensure the continuation of rail services across the region.
2. That Richard Barfoot’s suggestion to stop
HCV traffic heading north along Farndon Road be forwarded to Hastings
District Council for further consideration.
Remmerswaal/Cox
CARRIED
Submitter
30 – JR Haliburton (Jim)
The Committee noted the submitter’s suggestions around alternative
transport namely the use of barges up and down the coast which could load
directly onto log ships and the proposal to build a new route for SH2 from
Tutira to Bayview via the Waikoau Valley with the inclusion of a new bridge
to bypass the Waikare Gorge.
Following discussion, it was agreed that the appropriate Approved
Organisation will include strategic projects in relation to SH2 in the
Strategy as placeholders if future funding becomes available.
Resolution:
That J.R.Halliburton be thanked for the submission and be advised,
based on the comments made, that no change needs to be made to the RLTS or
RLTP.
Kingston/Clews
CARRIED
Submitter 4
– Citizens Environmental Advocacy Centre Inc (CEAC) - Ken Crispin
The Committee discussed the submission from CEAC and in particular
the environmental impacts as a result of increased heavy vehicle numbers on
arterial roads in the region. The support for rail services was also noted.
Resolution:
1.
That CEAC be thanked for their submission and
be advised, based on the comments made, that an amendment will be made to the
RLTS to make reference to the provision of multi-modal transport options, in
particular the use of rail as a freight transport alternative both north and
south of the region; and secondly to reflect the RTC’s advocacy position in
relation to the Gisborne – Napier rail line and desire to ensure the
continuation of rail services across the region.
2.
And further be advised that a statement will
be included in the RLTS to strengthen the wording around mitigation of noise
as an environmental impact.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
Submitter 5
– Mr Barry Crabbe
The Committee noted the submitter’s support for most sections of
the Strategy in particular the introduction of HPMV on selected routes which
will reduce the number of heavy vehicles on the network. The submitter’s
suggestions for improved facilities to alleviate environmental impacts on the
roads was also noted.
The Committee expressed concern with the submitter’s statement
that the Farndon Road overbridge would be an impediment in the network plans
for the future. Clarification was also sought from KiwiRail about double
stacking containers.
Resolution:
That Mr Crabbe
be thanked for his submission and be advised, that based on the comments
made, no change needs to be made to the RLTS.
Kingston/Schwass
CARRIED
|
