Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council

 

 

Date:                 Wednesday 24 September 2014

Time:                9.00am

Venue:

Council Chamber

Hawke's Bay Regional Council

159 Dalton Street

NAPIER

 

Attachments Excluded From Agenda

 

item       subject                                                                                                                   page

  

8.         Adoption of the Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1:     HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report                                            2

10.       Recommendations from the Corporate and Strategic Committee

Attachment 2:     The Big Six                                                                                    168    


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Contents

                                                                                                                                     page

Guide to the Annual Report                                                                                          

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Commentary 

Our Direction                                                                                                       

Reporting against The Right Debate                                                               

Report on progressive implementation of the 2011 National Policy
Statement for Freshwater Management                                     

 

Report on Maori Contribution to Council Decision-making Processes                  

Regional Planning Committee 

Maori Committee 

Direct Hapu and Other Involvement

 

Report on Council Controlled Organisations                                                              

 

Statement of Compliance and Responsibility 

 

Independent Auditor’s Report                                                                                     

 

Financial reporting benchmarks                                                                                    

1. Rates affordability benchmark                                                                

2. Debt Affordability Benchmark                                                                

3. Balanced Budget Benchmark                                                                  

4. Essential Services Benchmark                                                                 

5. Debt Servicing Benchmark                                                                      

6. Debt Control Benchmark                                                                         

7. Operations Control Benchmark

 

Statement of Service Performance for Groups of Activities                                   

 


                                                                                                                                     page

Strategic Planning                                                                                                            

Activity 1 – Economic Development

Activity 2 – Strategy and Planning 

Activity 3 – Policy Implementation 

Activity 4 – State of the Environment Monitoring 

Land Drainage and River Control

Activity 1 – Flood Protection and Drainage Schemes 

Activity 2 – Investigations & Enquiries 

Activity 3 – Sundry Works                                                                                 

 

Regional Resources 

Activity 1 – Land Management

Activity 2 – Air Management

Activity 3 – Water Management

Activity 4 – Coastal Management

Activity 5 – Gravel Management

Activity 6 – Open Spaces 

 

Regulation 

Activity 1 – Resource Consent Processing 

Activity 2 – Compliance Monitoring 

Activity 3 – Maritime Safety & Navigation 

Activity 4 – Building Act Implementation 

 

Biosecurity                                                                                                                         

Activity 1 – Regional Biosecurity Programmes                                               

 

Emergency Management 

Activity 1 – HB Civil Defence Emergency Management Group 

Activity 2 – Hazard Assessment & Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
Response 


                                                                                                                                     page

Transport                                                                                                                           

Activity 1 – Regional Road Safety 

Activity 2 – Regional Land Transport Strategy 

Activity 3 – Subsidised Passenger Transport

 

Governance and Community Engagement 

Activity 1 – Community Partnerships 

Activity 2 – Community Engagement & Communications 

Activity 3 – Response to Climate Change 

Activity 4 – Community Representation & Regional Leadership 

Activity 5 – Investment Company Support

 

Financial Statements 

Comprehensive Income Statement

Statement of Changes in Equity 

Balance Sheet

Statement of Cash Flows 

 

Notes to the Financial Statements 

Note 1:  General Information 

Note 2:  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 

Note 3:  Groups of Activities Revenue & Expenditure 

Note 4:  Rates Revenue 

Note 5:  Other Revenue 

Note 6:  Fair Value Gains & Losses Through the Income Statement

Note 7:  Expense Disclosures 

Note 8:  Income Tax Expense 

Note 9:  Property, Plant & Equipment


                                                                                                                                     page

Note 10:  Infrastructure Assets (Parent & Group)

Note 11:  Investment Property 

Note 12:  Intangible Assets 

Note 13:  Financial Assets 

Note 14:  Forestry Assets 

Note 15:  Trade & Other Receivable                                                                

Note 16:  Derivative Financial Instruments 

Note 17:  Cash & Cash Equivalents 

Note 18:  Fair Value Reserves 

Note 19:  Other Reserves (Parent & Group)

Note 20:  Borrowings 

Note 21:  Deferred Income Tax (Group)

Note 22:  Employee Benefit Liabilities 

Note 23:  Trade & Other Payables                                                                   

Note 24:  Provisions for Other Liabilities and Charges 

Note 25:  Related-Party Disclosures (Group)

Note 26:  Commitments & Contingencies 

Note 27 Local Government Act 2002 Disclosures 

Note 28: Major Budget Variances (Parent)

Note 29:  Financial Risk Management

Note 30 Non-current assets held for sale 

Note 31 Events After Balance Sheet Date (Parent & Group)

 

Funding Impact Statements for Groups of Activity                                                   

 

General Information                                                                                                       

 

About Hawke’s Bay Regional Council                                                                            

 

Appendix A:  Key Implementation milestones and activities for the

National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Our Purpose

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has a long term focus and exists due to our role in:

·      Natural resource management and governance;

·      Natural hazard assessment and mitigation;

·      Regional strategic planning (including provision of statutory plans such as the regional policy statement); and

·      The provision and assessment of regional scale infrastructure, notably flood risk assets, regional logistics facilities such as Napier Port and water storage.

Our Vision

A region with a vibrant community, a prosperous economy, a clean and healthy environment, now and for future generations.

Our Values

Excellence – we aim high and take pride in providing an exceptional service

Forward thinking – We anticipate and prepare for the future

Innovation – We are open to change and seek new ways of doing things

Integrity – We demonstrate openness, honesty and respect in our relationships

Partnerships – We build strong partnerships to achieve common goals

Our Goals

We have adopted three goals for the region – a vibrant community, a prosperous economy, and a clean and healthy environment.

These goals are a bridge between our vision, our community outcomes and our group of activity work programmes. All of our work should meet the definition of at least one of our goals; if not, we should not be doing the work.  However much of our work meets all three goals.

 

 

A clean and healthy environment” is the most strategic of the goals and underpins the success of the others. Without a good environment our community will not enjoy living in the region and prosperity may be hard to achieve.

Guide to the Annual Report

The Annual Report is divided into three sections to make it easy to find the information you want.

·    Performance Overview

This includes an Introduction from the Chairman and the Chief Executive along with an update on key issues.

·    Accountability Information

This section includes:

-        The Statement of Service Performance for the year and an overview of each Group of Activity

-        How each Group of Activity links to the community outcomes

-        A report which measures the performance of each sub-activity

-        Financial details for the Regional Council for the year to 30 June 2014 and for the Port of Napier Limited for the 12 months to 31 March 2014, which together make up the Group accounts.

·    General Information

This section includes general information about Council's resources, assets and activities, the Councillors, the organisational structure, and an outline of information available for public use.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Commentary

Kia ora.  This Report summarises the work of Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) during year two of HBRC’s Long Term Plan 2012 – 2022.

In The Right Debate section of the Long Term Plan 2012-22 (the LTP), we highlighted the big issues facing Hawke’s Bay and explained how HBRC would address these – this decade – along with their associated financial calculations.

In the twelve months to year end 30 June 2014, HBRC has made good progress on our major projects, with continuing focus on the delivery of our day-to-day operational activities.

Our Direction

Our Long Term Plan is based on the overall direction set down in HBRC’s 2011 Strategic Plan.  The Hawke’s Bay Strategic Plan identified HBRC’s business as:

·      Natural resource management and governance

·      Natural hazard assessment and mitigation

·      Regional strategic planning

·      Provision and assessment of regional scale infrastructure and services.

Tukituki River.


Reporting against ‘The Right Debate’ key issues

The following pages are a summary of HBRC’s achievements over the last reporting year, in the key areas identified in The Right Debate section of HBRC’s 2012-22 Long Term Plan.

Natural resource management and governance

Tukituki Catchment Proposal (TCP) – this is both Plan Change 6 and resource consents for a $260 million water storage scheme on the Ruataniwha Plains. TCP was called-in by the Minister for the Environment and the Minister of Conservation and was heard by an independent Board of Inquiry.  The Board issued its final decisions on 26 June 2014.  Plan Change 6 introduces new requirements for water and land use and requires significant council input and focus, irrespective of whether or not the water storage scheme goes ahead.

Hill Country Afforestation – in the LTP, HBRC approved a provision of $47 million for investment in hill country afforestation. We based this on partnerships to promote afforesting the steepest and least productive parts of land, in return for carbon credit revenue. However, 2012’s collapse of carbon pricing

image description

saw this proposal parked.  HBRC has instead investigated alternative funding sources and incentives to help establish trees on farms, to complement livestock and agricultural systems and protect the environment.

A key part of this is our work in the High Performance Manuka Primary Growth Partnership.  The goal of this PGP is to deliver significant increases in investment returns for Unique Manuka Factor (UMF) honey. HBRC seeks to show how these returns can be delivered through its manuka trial at Lake Tūtira, as a viable alternative to pasture on steep erodible hill country. Results on this trial are expected by 2018.

Regional Landcare Scheme (RLS) – HBRC funds the RLS at $880,000 per annum, with criteria to make sure the funding is distributed to priority focus areas. The RLS is targeted to support catchments where objectives must be met under regional plans, linked to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater.

HeatSmart – air quality in the Napier and Hastings air sheds each winter still doesn’t meet government standards required by 2016.

However, HBRC’s programme is helping the region move to compliance with healthier homes and improved health

outcomes. Our programmes have delivered a total of 5,158 Clean Heat packages, including 2,490 in the 13-14 financial year. 2,023 assistance packages for Insulation have been delivered, including 372 in the 13-14 financial year.

Ngaruroro Water Storage Investigations – HBRC made provision of $27 million for a possible equity stake in a water storage scheme in the Ngaruroro catchment. However, full feasibility investigations were deferred by HBRC, awaiting the completion of more economic assessment work and the availability of staff after completing the Ruataniwha Water Storage process.

Strategic Alliances – HBRC has made good progress in this area, in particular:

1.      The Regional Planning Committee has equal representation from elected councillors and treaty claimant groups, making important policy development decisions. They met four times during the year and typically consider a range of natural resource related issues, recorded in more detail following this commentary.

2.      The Nature Central alliance with the Department of Conservation and two other regional councils is continuing, with focus on seven core projects including wide-scale pest and predator control.


Natural hazard assessment and mitigation

Civil Defence and Emergency Management (CDEM) in early 2014 the Hawke’s Bay CDEM Group completed a new strategic plan which incorporates the results of a capability report completed by the Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management and lessons from the Canterbury earthquakes.  This Plan identifies the work needed to make our community more resilient and is endorsed by all of Hawke’s Bay’s councils.  This year the Group has commenced a review to ensure it has the resources and structure to implement this Plan over the next 5 years.

Regional Natural Hazards, Research & Planning – a joint project has been commissioned to review the potential for liquefaction in Hawke’s Bay.  This includes the development of a geo-technical database, following the success of the Canterbury Geotechnical Database (CGD).  Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) and Tonkin & Taylor with GNS Science have supported the expansion of the CGD for use in Hawke’s Bay, with a view to expanding it to the rest of New Zealand in future.  Work continues on a change to the Regional Policy Statement to implement a risk based approach, and strengthen the requirement for local authorities to consider the impacts of natural hazards when considering land use changes.

Makara Dam – was deconstructed due to storm damage and rebuilt. Following a Special Consultative Process and Hearing, HBRC decided to reinstate the No 1 dam and also provide for a de-silting programme. The cost of repair work was $1,262,000. 60% was funded from the Regional Disaster Reserve and the remainder from Scheme funds, including a loan.


Regional strategic planning

Urban Growth Planning – HBRC, in conjunction with Napier City and Hastings District councils, completed the Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy (adopted in August 2010), with urban containment being a principal philosophy. This led to the development and processing of Plan Change 4 – Managing the Built Environment to the Regional Policy Statement.  Change 4 became operative on 1 January 2014. An Implementation Committee for the Strategy has since been established.

Regional Economic Development – benefitted from a targeted rate as part of the LTP process.  Support continued for business growth and attraction in the region through Business Hawke’s Bay. Hawke’s Bay’s business allocation of research and development funding through Callaghan Innovation’s Regional Partner programme again exceeded annual targets.  A focus on primary sector resilience was assisted through a number of Ruataniwha water storage related initiatives as well as engagement with other primary and processing sector organisations.  HBRC continued to represent the region’s interests at both at a regional economic development agency and central government level. In addition to funding economic research and reports, we have also played a role in select issues such as the Napier-Gisborne rail link, and oil and gas exploration.

Report on progressive implementation of the 2011 National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

Freshwater is one of our region’s most precious natural resources and much of the Regional Council’s work revolves around it.  In May 2011, the Government introduced the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPSFM).  The NPSFM sets a new direction for maintaining and improving water quality and protecting life in our rivers, lakes, streams and aquifers.  It is mostly HBRC’s responsibility to implement NPSFM as it relates to our region.  NPSFM does not specify exactly how it shall be implemented, or how policy statements and plans should be amended, which is for each regional community to determine for themselves.

 

In September 2012, HBRC adopted an Implementation Programme in line with Policy E1 of NPSFM.  The Programme outlines key actions that council will undertake to fully implement NPSFM.[1]  Policy E1[2] of NPSFM requires that council give an annual report on the degree to which the Programme has been implemented.  The Programme does not start from a blank canvas.  Even prior to NPSFM coming into effect, the Regional Council had significant elements in place that align with and give effect to NPSFM.  Some of those key elements were identified in NPSFM’s Implementation Programme. 

Following is a brief outline of council’s key implementation achievements during 2013-14. Appendix A gives a fuller description of these achievements and several other activities to implement NPSFM.

During the 2013-14 period, the Regional Council:

1.     Completed the RMA process for Regional Policy Statement Change 4 (Managing the Built Environment) when Change 4 was made operative on 1 January 2014.

2.     Continued Environment Court-assisted negotiations on four appeals against Change 5 (land and freshwater management) to the Regional Resource Management Plan.

3.     Presented its evidence to the Board of Inquiry hearing the Tukituki Catchment Proposal (Plan change 6 and HBRIC’s applications for the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme).  The Board issued its final decisions on the proposal in June 2014.

4.     Assessed a variety of resource management policy options through council’s Regional Planning Committee, for catchments including the Mohaka River and the Greater Heretaunga / Ahuriri catchment area.

5.     Achieved 100% compliance with the first phase of the transitional Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting of Water Takes) Regulations 2010 and is on track to achieve phase two by the November 2014 timeframe.

6.     Facilitated the establishment of key water user groups to work towards efficient water use through alternative water management options, including groups in the Ngaruroro, Ruataniwha and wider Tukituki catchments.

7.     Continued co-ordination and facilitation of interest groups for preparing regional plan changes in the Mohaka Catchment and Greater Heretaunga / Ahuriri catchment area.

8.     Supported a sector-wide submission by Local Government NZ on proposed amendments to NPSFM.

Biodiversity – has seen significant progress being made on the final strategy document with strong support from our partners.  The Biodiversity Strategy Steering Group is supported by a Core Working Group and expects to deliver the regional Strategy for consultation towards the end of 2014.

Provision and assessment of regional scale infrastructure and services

Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme (RWSS) – is complementary to the Tukituki Catchment Proposal.  After receiving independent advice on investment risk, and hearing community views through a public consultation process, council’s investment company recommended that HBRC proceed to invest in RWSS.

Council subsequently agreed on the important decision of funding up to $80M as an equity stake in the proposed subsidiary company to run RWSS.  The key consideration ahead will be to decide if the scheme should proceed to implementation at the point of ‘financial close’, anticipated to be during 2015.

A concept image of the proposed Ruataniwha Water Storage reservoir, © OHL-Hawkins.

Regional Parks Network Plan – was adopted by Council in November 2013. Individual park plans have subsequently been initiated to help protect, maintain and enhance the community’s popular regional park assets.

Public Transport – numbers increased for the second year running , with  total  passenger trips  reaching a record high of 799,845; a 5% increase on the 2012-13 year.

 

Operational Efficiency – is an ongoing area of focus for HBRC. Numerous other operational activities that fall under HBRC’s management responsibilities continued, with an eye on delivering public services, infrastructure and regulation efficiently and effectively.


Financial Reporting Benchmarks

This is the first year of Council reporting on a series of financial performance benchmarks which include rates affordability, debt affordability, balanced budget and others.  Our reporting of actual performance against the targets set out in council’s Long Term Plan will be reported and commented on.  These new reporting measures are in line with Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014.

To help understand the extent to which council has been able to deliver on the financial benchmarks against targets in the Long Term Plan, please refer to the charts presented in the first part of this Annual Report.

 

Lastly

Overall, it has been a busy and fulfilling year for HBRC, working across a range of stakeholder and community groups, addressing activities that will in time have either national, regional or local-scale effects for the wellbeing of our Hawke’s Bay community.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                          

Liz Lambert, Interim Chief Executive                     Fenton Wilson, Chairman

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Report on Maori Contribution to Council Decision-making Processes

Clause 35 to Schedule 10 of the Local Government Act 2002 requires Council to include in its annual report a report on the activities that Council has undertaken in the year to establish and maintain processes to provide for opportunities for Maori to contribute to Council’s decision-making processes.

Regional Planning Committee

The Regional Planning Committee was established in April 2012 to consider and provide recommendations to Council on resource management and strategic environmental planning.  The Committee is made up of an equal number of Regional Councillors and representatives from each of the Hawke’s Bay Treaty Settlement Claimant groups.  The Committee is chaired under a dual chairmanship arrangement.  The current Co-chairs are the Regional Council Chairman and Mr Toro Waaka, the Ngati Pahauwera representative on the Committee.  Having been permanently established by the Council, the Committee is not dissolved every three years while local body elections take place.  This enables the Committee and in particular the Treaty Settlement Claimant groups, to undertake long term planning spanning multiple years.  Since forming, the Committee has worked together without a formal Government mandate, pending the passage of legislation.  They operate under the principles of co-governance to ensure that tāngata whenua are active decision makers in managing their taonga under the Resource Management Act 1991.

The Committee met formally four times between July 2013 and June 2014 to consider issues and make recommendations to the Regional Council.  There have been a number of multi-year projects and items that the Committee has considered this year, these are:

·      Taharua/Mohaka Catchment Policy Development and Stakeholder Engagement

·      Change 5 (Land and Freshwater Management) appeals

·      Draft annual report for national policy statement (NPS) freshwater management implementation programmes

·      Resource Management Reform

·      Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri Catchment Plan Change

·      Local Government Reorganisation

·      Change 6 (Tukituki River Catchment) Draft Board of Inquiry Decision

·      Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group presentation

Three members are accredited Resource Management Act hearing commissioners.

Maori Committee

There have been 5 two-monthly meetings of the Maori Committee during the year. There were twelve tangata whenua appointees on the committee as well as four elected representatives of Council.

Two members of the Maori Committee were appointed to the Environment and Services Committee of Council, which met on 5 occasions during the year.

Two Maori Committee representatives have been appointed to the Corporate and Strategic Committee, which met on 4 occasions during the year.

The Chairman of the Council’s Maori Committee has attended 17 meetings of the Regional Council where he has speaking rights on all issues.

The Maori Committee is also represented on the Hearings Committee, with three members being accredited Resource Management Act hearing commissioners.

Members of the Council’s Maori Committee are informed of all consent applications and can request further information and provide comment as well as assist with directing Council officers to the correct tangata whenua for consultation or other issues.

Direct Hapū and Other Involvement

Council has continued to have direct interaction with specific hapu on issues of concern to them within their rohe.

The Chairman of the Maori Committee has attended numerous hui involving Marae and hapu of specific interest groups on behalf of the Regional Council.


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Report on Council Controlled Organisations

Introduction

The Local Government Act 2002 (Act) requires the Council to include in its annual report certain information on each council-controlled organisation in which the Council is a shareholder or has the power to appoint directors, or members of the governing body of the organisation.

The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has such a relationship with one council-controlled organisation namely Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Limited (HBRIC Ltd). This report sets out below the information required by clause 28 of Schedule 10 to the Act.

Ownership and Control Policies

Council is required to report on the implementation or attainment of any significant policies and objectives in regard to ownership and control of council-controlled organisations during the year.

During this year there have been no changes to the ownership of HBRIC Ltd, however changes have been made to the company’s governance arrangements.

In December 2013, Council resolved to appoint two new Independent Directors to replace the three Councillor Directors and Managing Director on the HBRIC Ltd Transition Board. It is intended that the Transition Board be replaced with an ongoing Board after the date of financial close for the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme which is anticipated to be in the second half of the 2014/15 financial year.

Nature and Scope of Activities

Council is required to compare the nature and scope of the activities intended to be provided by council-controlled organisations (as set out in the Long Term Plan 2012-22) with the actual nature and scope of activities provided for the year.

The summary of the nature and scope of activities below is illustrative of the key performance targets for HBRIC Ltd set by Council which are:

 

 

 

That HBRIC Ltd is to actively manage its allocated investment portfolio and any new investment it makes to ensure:

1.      Growth in long term shareholder value

2.      Increased financial and strategic returns

3.      Investments are secure and sustainable over the long term

4.      Investments will assist achievement of Council’s regional strategic development objectives.

A summary of the nature and scope of activities intended to be provided by HBRIC Ltd (as set out in the Long Term Plan 2012-22) compared to the actual nature and scope of activities provided for the year are as follows.

·       Own and manage the investment assets and liabilities transferred to it by Council from time to time.

-        HBRIC Ltd continued to manage the investment in the Napier Port following the transfer of shares from Council on 25 June 2012.

-        On 31 October 2012 the feasibility assets of the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme were transferred from Council to HBRIC Ltd along with responsibility for progressing the project to the conclusion of the resource consent application phase. HBRIC Ltd continued to manage this investment through this phase which is anticipated to conclude in the second half of the 2014/15 financial year.

·       Make new investments and dispose of current investments in pursuit of its objectives.

-        The continued investment in the development phase of the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme has been made in pursuit of HBRIC Ltd’s objectives.

·      
Investment in and manage a range of financial and physical assets in accordance with Council’s investment policy detailed in the Long Term Plan 2012-22.

-        HBRIC Ltd has managed its investments in accordance with Council’s investment policy detailed in the Long Term Plan 2012‑22.

·       Raise funds for investment but at no time by selling any of Council’s 100% shareholding in HBRIC Ltd or Napier Port without Council undertaking a special consultative process.

-        No funds were raised for investment in the current year.

·       Assist its subsidiary and associated companies to increase shareholder value in regional prosperity through growth and investment.

-        The HBRIC Ltd Board meets with the Napier Port Chairman and CEO on a quarterly basis to discuss its operating activities and any investment opportunities that have the potential to increase shareholder value.

Other Key Performance Targets

Comparison of actual specific financial performance targets compared to those set out in the Long Term Plan 2012-22 are outlined in the table following.


 

Initial Performance Targets

Performance Indicator

Target

Actual

Net debt to net debt plus Equity

<40%

26%

Interest cover (EBIT/Interest Paid)

>3x

6x

EBITDA/Total Assets

13%

11%

Return on Shareholders’ Funds

5%

8%

Notes:    EBIT = Earnings Before Interest and Tax

                EBITDA = Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation

               Net debt means gross borrowings from outside the “HBRIC Ltd “group”,
                less loans made to parties outside the HBRIC Ltd “group”

 


Statement of Compliance and Responsibility

Compliance

1.      The Council and management of Hawke's Bay Regional Council confirm that all the statutory requirements of the Local Government Act 2002, in relation to the annual report, have been complied with.

Responsibility

2.      The Council and management of Hawke's Bay Regional Council accept responsibility for the preparation of the annual Financial Statements and the judgements used in them.

3.      The Council and management of Hawke's Bay Regional Council accept responsibility for establishing and maintaining a system of internal control designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the integrity and reliability of financial reporting.

4.      In the opinion of the Council and management of Hawke's Bay Regional Council, the annual Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2014 fairly reflect the financial position and operations of Hawke's Bay Regional Council.

 

 

 

                                                                                                          

Fenton Wilson                        Liz Lambert                                   Paul Drury

Chairman                                 Interim Chief Executive              Group Manager

Corporate Services

24 September 2014             24 September 2014                    24 September 2014

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Financial Reporting Benchmarks

The purpose of the statement set out below is to disclose the Council’s financial performance in relation to various benchmarks to enable the assessment of whether the Council is prudently managing its revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and general financial dealings.

These new reporting measures are set out in the Local Government (Financial Reporting and Prudence) Regulations 2014.  This legislation is prescriptive as to the format and content of the benchmarks to be reported on.

1. Rates affordability benchmarks

“The Council meets the rates affordability benchmark if:

-       its actual rates income equals or is less than each quantified limit on rates; and

-       its actual rates increases equal or are less than each quantified limit on rates increases.”


(A) Rates Income Affordability Benchmark

The following graph compares the Council’s actual rates income with a quantified limit on rates contained in the financial strategy as included in Council’s long term plans.  The quantified limit used in the graph below uses dollars as unit for measurement for budgeted and actual rates.

2009-10 (Exceeds Limit by $106,000)

The marginal increase in actual rates over that level planned relates to additional rating units (properties relating to new housing developments etc) being added to the rating database when the Council sends out the rates assessment during October of each year.  The rating income as included in the Long Term Plan uses as a basis, the rating units on the database at the time of the development of the Plan which is February/March of each year.

2010-11 (Below Limit by $1,009,000)

The reasons for actual rates being below the level set out in the Long Term Plan were due to:

-       It was assumed that $218,000 of the science expenditure would be collected from a targeted rate.  The Council actually collected these funds by a section 36 charge on water consent holders.

-       It was assumed the Council would collect $250,000 through a targeted rate for nutrient stripping developments in the Tukituki valley.  This targeted rate was not implemented.

-       The subsidised passenger transport rate proposed in the 10 Year Plan 2009-2019 was decreased by $478,000 because the New Zealand Transport Authority was not in a position to support the proposed additional services.

2011/12 (Below Limit by $1,549,000)

The reasons why actual rates were below the limit set in the Long Term Plan are as below:

-       Most of the reasons for the variation actual to budget are provided above under the reasons for 2010/11.  Further, the 10 Year Plan 2009-2019 provided in the 2011/12 year for an additional $231,000 of water science expenditure to be collected as a targeted rate.  This further amount was also collected by a section 36 charge on water consent holders.

-       There was a decrease in general rates of $124,000 due to efficiencies made in Council’s operations resulting in decreased costs.

2012/13 (Exceeds Limit by $152,000)

Please refer to the explanation given in 2009/10 above as the same principle applies.

2013/14 (Below Limit by $76,000)

For this year rates did not exceed the limit - the decrease being due to Council resolving to achieve expenditure reductions and limit the rates increase to the level of increase in inflation.


(B) Rates Increases Affordability Benchmark

The following graph compares the Council’s actual rate increase with the quantified limit on rate increases included in the financial strategies in Council’s long terms plans.  The quantified limit included in this graph as a unit of measurement is percentage increase in rates from the previous financial year.

The explanations for explaining the variances for each of the years when comparing the budgeted percentage increase in rates as compared to the actual increase in rates are consistent with the explanations as provided in the preceding graphs on Rates Income Affordability.


2. Debt Affordability Benchmark

“The Council meets the debt affordability benchmark if its actual borrowing is within each quantified limit on borrowing.”

The financial strategy included in Council’s Long Term Plan set out two quantified limits on borrowing as below:

a)     Total interest expense on external public debt (including lease annuity) will not exceed 25% of total annual operating expenditure.

b)    Council loan funding will not exceed a debt to debt equity ratio of 28%.

Graphs are provided below for each of these borrowing limits.

 

 

 

 

 

The above graphs establish that each of the five years presented are well within the borrowing limits.


3. Balanced Budget Benchmark

“The Council meets this benchmark if its revenue equals or is greater than its operating expenses.”

The following graph displays the Council’s revenue (excluding development contributions), financial contributions, vested assets, gains on derivative financial instruments, and revaluations of property, plant, or equipment, as a proportion of operating expenses (excluding losses on derivative financial instruments and revaluations of property, plant or equipment).

In the three years 2001/12, 2012/13 and 2013/14 where Council has not achieved a balanced budget, this has been due to Council resolving at the time of approving each Annual Plan to use Council reserves (Dividend Equalisation and Operating reserves) to fund a portion of Council’s operating expenses.

It is worth noting that Council established the Dividend Equalisation reserve to provide funding to offset any unfavourable fluctuations in regional income in any one year.  This action is important in order to ensure there are minimum fluctuations in rates due to movements in regional income.

4. Essential Services Benchmark

“The Council meets this benchmark if its capital expenditure on network services equals or is greater than depreciation on network services.”

The following graph displays Council’s capital expenditure on network services as a proportion of deprecation on network services - (NB: Council has only one network service and that covers the flood and drainage schemes):

Council has met this benchmark for all the years included in the above graph as its expenditure on flood and drainage schemes has exceeded the depreciation set aside for such schemes.  The additional funding in excess of depreciation has been met from scheme reserves and borrowings.


5. Debt Servicing Benchmark

“The Council meets the debt servicing benchmark if its borrowing costs are equal or less than 10% of its revenue.”

The following graph displays the Council’s borrowing costs as a proportion of revenue (excluding development contributions, financial contributions, vested assets, gains on derivative financial instruments, and revaluations on property, plant and equipment).

Council has met the benchmark for all years included in the above graph.  The 2013/14 includes $1.7million of annuity costs paid to ACC for the sell down of Napier leasehold property casflows.


6. Debt Control Benchmark

“The Council meets the debt control benchmark if its actual net debt equals or is less than its planned net debt.”

The following graph displays the Council’s actual net debt as a proportion of planned net debt.  In this statement, net debt means financial liabilities less financial assets (excluding trade and other receivables).

Council has met the benchmark in all of the years except 2012/13 when the percentage is shown as 0.8% over the benchmark.


7. Operations Control Benchmark

“The Council meets the operations control benchmark if its actual net cash flow from operations equals or is greater than its planned net cash flow from operations.”

 

The following graph displays the Council’s variance between actual and budgeted net cash flow from operations.

Council has met this benchmark (i.e. actual net cash flow from operations has exceeded planned levels) for all the years (other than 2012-13).  These variations in operating cash balances use Annual Plan budgets as compared with actual cash balances.

 

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Statement of Service Performance for Groups of Activities

Introduction

Council separates its operations into eight groups of activities and establishes levels of service and performance targets for each of these, details of which were included in the Long Term Plan 2012-22(Part 3, pages 5-91) and the Annual Plan 2013-14 (Part 2, pages 5-62).

Under the Local Government Act 2002, schedule 10 (part 3) Council is required to:

·      Identify the activities within the group of activities.

·      Identify the community outcomes to which the group primarily contributes.

·      Report the results of any measurement undertaken during the year of progress toward achievement of those outcomes.

·      Describe any identified effects that any activity within the group of activities has had on the community.

Reporting

Council’s reporting in this ‘Statement of Service Performance’ covers:

·      A financial summary for each group of activities.

·      Performance targets as contained in the Annual Plan 2013-14 for each activity, including a managerial commentary on the achievements for the year and, where relevant, comments on future activities.

·      An explanation of any financial variances.

The performance targets have been structured so as to include timeliness, cost, quantity, location and quality as following.


Timeliness

Results are reported on an exception basis; consequently references are only made to dates where the target dates were missed.

Cost

Targets within each group of activity have been grouped for the purposes of setting cost targets.  Where actual expenditure varies by more than $50,000 of the budget a short explanation is included.

Quantity

Results are reported on an exception basis. Consequently, if the task was completed at the quantity specified no specific reference to quantity is made.

Location

Results are specified on an exception basis. Consequently, if the task was completed at the location specified no specific reference to location is made.

Quality

During 2013-14 Council reviewed, throughout the financial year, the progress made against the individual performance targets at the end of five months and nine months, with consideration being given to the overall targets for the year.  In determining whether quality requirements were being met, the elected representatives drew on their knowledge of the activities, the resources utilised to undertake them, and the outcome evident from the activities.  They also drew assurance from the knowledge that Council had:

·      Employed, either directly or through external agencies, suitably qualified staff (for example registered engineers and surveyors, members of the NZ Planning Institute, a member of the International Harbourmasters’ Association, etc) with demonstrable experience relevant to their responsibilities;

·      Ensured that staff were aware of current practices and developments relevant to their responsibilities through attendance and involvement in conferences, seminars and training courses;

·      Reviewed the performance of flood control schemes after each flood deemed to be in excess of a 5-year event to ensure that schemes functioned as expected;

·      Ensured that, where relevant, reference is made to established scientific conventions, international standards set by overseas agencies, professional legal advice and opinions, published case law precedents, and public submissions;

·      Ensured that, where relevant, external peer reviews of plans and programmes were carried out;

·      Carried out internal technical peer reviews and external legal reviews, throughout Regional Resource Management Plan plan change preparation processes, and actively sought the input of the public through submission and appeal processes.


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

The diagram below illustrates the relationship between Community Outcomes, Council’s goals and the groups of activities.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Strategic Planning

The Strategic Planning activities pull together Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) strategic thinking initiatives, economic development, investments and resource management policy development. Together with State of the Environment reports, these provide information for further planning decisions.

There was no capital expenditure for on-site waste water disposal advances for the 2013-14 year.  These are instigated by Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs) working directly with community groups and there were no applications for advances received from TLAs.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Economic Development

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1 – Economic Development

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

Regional Economic Development Strategy mission statement: “To make Hawke’s Bay the best location in which to visit, work, invest, live and grow”

Comprehensive visitor strategy in place within an overall regional marketing plan

2013-2014

­ Continue quarterly reporting to Council on key performance indicators

Achieved.

HB Tourism Ltd (HBT) provides a quarterly report to Council. Overall results for Hawke’s Bay for the year ending April 2014 showed a positive result with 4% growth in guest nights. (Commercial +1.5%, Private Household Monitor +3.9%)

Brand “Hawke’s Bay’ and tagline “Get me to Hawke’s Bay” continue to be used in all communication. HBT continues to take a far stronger domestic focus with digital activity including the placement of digital video to promote the region to its key target audiences (families, independent travellers and active boomers) and to promote for events such as the Big Easy and F.A.W.C!   Within the last twelve months HBT has managed a second Summer FAWC! Food and Wine Classic (twice the size of the first event in 2012) and Four Weekends of Winter  F.A.W.C! in June (also double the size of the first winter event).  HBT also managed the second Big Easy cycle ride on the Hawke's Bay Trails alongside key regional partners. This event also doubled in size from 2013.  The second Tourism Awards for the region was held in September and trade and media activity continues with travel agents and media being hosted in the region throughout the year.

Long term Regional Economic Development Strategy

2013-2014

­ Annually review and progress the regional economic development strategy

Partially achieved.

Following two facilitated workshops, Business Hawke’s Bay has recommended the review process should include input and oversight from the Inter Sector Forum, and is pursuing this as an initiative.

Investment for research and development and business development

2013-14

­ At least $800,000 per annum achieved for Research and Development investment

Achieved.

A total funding of $1,146,917.30 across 25 company projects was approved in this financial year. Approx 60% of these companies were undertaking research and development projects relating to primary industries (Agriculture, Horticulture, Food and Beverage, textiles). The balance of the projects were undertaken predominantly by companies involved in engineering and general manufacturing.

Sustainable regional growth

2013-14

Continue to develop and initiate sustainable primary production programmes

Achieved.

The primary focus was on the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme, including hosting a Regional Leaders Tour of Mid and South Canterbury to better understand the Socio-Economic impacts of large scale Irrigation and Water Storage Infrastructure projects. There has been some preliminary investigation of alternative farming systems and developing new initiatives for Maori Agribusiness and Wairoa primary sector opportunities.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The budget for this activity was under spent in internal costs as more time than anticipated was spent on the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme.

 


Activity 2 – Strategy and Planning

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2 –Strategy and Planning

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will help the community prepare for the future

 

Number of Embracing Futures Thinking events held

Each year

­ Host 3 Embracing Futures Thinking events.

Not achieved.

No events hosted during the reporting period.

Trends review completed

2013-14

­ Refresh the Trends and Environmental Scan analysis

Partially achieved.

The 2013 Census information and a report on Hawke’s Bay Region – Socio-Demographic Profile 1986-2011 was used to refresh demographic trends and use was made of Royal Dutch Shell’s new scenario report to review other trends at a global level. This refresh will be used to inform Council’s strategic planning for the Long Term Plan.

Agreement reached on Spatial Planning Framework

2014-15

­ Reach agreement on regional and lower North Island spatial planning framework

Not achieved. 

No progress was initiated on spatial planning framework during the reporting period.  For the development of the 2014-15 annual plan, it was determined that this project be put on hold pending the outcome of amalgamation proposals.  Meanwhile, Change 4 (Managing the Built Environment) to the Hawke's Bay Regional Resource Management Plan became operative on 1 January 2014.  This is another key milestone for the Regional Council’s implementation of the 2010 Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy which is spatially based.

HBRC will integrate land and water and biodiversity management to deliver environmental, economic, social and cultural outcomes

Action plans and monitoring reports prepared for:

-     Land and Water Management Strategy

-     National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

Each year

Prepare action plans and monitoring reports for:

1.   Land and Water Management Strategy

2.   National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

Hold a Land and Water Symposium to engage the wider community

Partially achieved.

No specific plans or reports were prepared during the reporting period, but a report on progressive implementation of the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management was adopted and published as part of the 2012-13 Annual Report.

Draft ‘stock take’ on implementation of the Land and Water Management Strategy was presented to the Corporate and Strategic Committee meeting on 12 March 2014.

No Land and Water symposium was held during the reporting period, but numerous stakeholder engagement processes were underway during the reporting period (e.g. Mohaka and Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri catchment areas). The stakeholder commitment of time and knowledge to these processes are acknowledged and appreciated.

Regional Biodiversity Strategy completed

Develop a Regional Biodiversity Strategy:

2013-14:  Consult on the draft and prepare final Strategy

2014-15:  Prepare programme for work relevant to HBRC for inclusion in the next Long Term Plan

Partially achieved.

The regional biodiversity strategy project has had a number of outputs delivered:

-    A regional biodiversity inventory has been completed to assist in prioritisation of activities. Inventory development involved external expert workshops facilitated by HBRC.

-    Delivery of the Strategy via a Forum, Accord and Trust has been agreed by the Strategy Steering Group. The Forum would coordinate on-the-ground activities and monitor progress; the Accord would signal commitment (of Council and external Agencies) to the Strategy; the Trust would prioritise activities and coordinate resources. Further detail on structure and process to be developed.

-    Core Working Group (staff and external experts) has developed a Regional Biodiversity Strategy ‘strawman’ due to be reviewed by the wider Steering Group.

-    Tangata whenua contributions to strategy development are being led by Te Roopu Kaitiaki o te Wai Maori with some significant outputs to date including draft actions for achieving biodiversity objectives for tangata whenua.

HBRC will establish and maintain clear and appropriate policy in a responsive and timely manner that will enable sustainable management of the region’s natural and physical resources

­ Status of Resource Management Plans and Policy Statements

­ No more than 2 years elapse from notification of a plan change to decisions on submissions being issued

 

2013-14

Plan change for Tukituki River Catchment publicly notified May 2013

2014-15

Plan change for Taharua /Upper Mohaka catchment publicly notified Dec 2014

2016-17

Plan change for Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri Catchment Area publicly notified Dec 2016

Achieved.

Plan Change 6 (Tukituki Catchment) was publicly notified on 4th May 2013.  Change 6 was called-in by the Environment and Conservation Ministers (via the Environmental Protection Authority) to be part of the Tukituki Catchment Proposal (in conjunction with applications for the Ruataniwha Water Storage project). Board of Inquiry’s hearings were held over 18 November 2013 to 21 January 2014. Significant time and resources have been invested in preparation and pre-circulation of expert evidence (and rebuttal evidence) for the plan change, analysis of evidence presented by submitters, plus Board-directed expert conferencing during the hearing.  The Board issued its final decisions on 26 June 2014. Two High Court appeals have subsequently been lodged and will proceed through the 2014/15 period.

Taharua/Mohaka: science investigations and assessments are progressing in parallel with land owner discussions.  Stakeholder discussions canvassing wider Mohaka River Catchment occurred in targeted interviews, focus groups during the reporting period.  Mohaka Consultation Group is yet to be formed as a sounding board for issues, options, choices and plan drafting prior to notification of a plan change.

A collaborative stakeholder group (the ‘TANK Group’) has been discussing management options for land, groundwater and surface water resources in the Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri area (which includes the Tutaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamu catchments, the Heretaunga aquifers and the receiving marine environments).  The TANK Group has prepared a report outlining the Group’s 45 interim agreements.  That report was presented to the Regional Planning Committee in February 2014 where the RPC endorsed the TANK Group’s work and agreed to have particular regard to any consensus outcome from the group should one emerge.  Previously (August 2012), the Council gave a good faith commitment to support any consensus recommendations (that are consistent with other planning documents) from the TANK Group.

2014-15

Plan change for Natural Hazards publicly notified July 2014

Not achieved.

Initial scoping of the plan change commenced during the reporting period in liaison with review of the HB CDEM Group Plan.  Scoping and work on the ‘first draft’ is strongly guided by ‘Regional Natural Hazards and Land Use Planning Strategy’.  Further work is on hold pending shape of resource management reforms.

Regional Coastal Environment Plan

­ At all times there is a regional plan in force for the HB coastal marine area

­ New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement (NZCPS) put into action in accordance with statutory requirements

2013-14

­ Scoping and prioritising of plan changes required to give effect to 2010 NZCPS

2014-15

­ Start review of coastal hazard zones if re-assessment (Project 322) necessary.

­ Notify plan change to give effect to 2010 NZCPS

Not achieved.

Regional Coastal Environment Plan (RCEP) and associated Variations 1, 2 and 3 were initially referred to the Minister in December 2012.  Minister of Conservation eventually issued his approval on 19 June 2014.  This delay meant the RCEP could not be made operative within performance targets.

Due to delays in Ministerial approval of RCEP, a consultant was engaged in May 2014 to undertake a ‘gap analysis’ of the RCEP against the 2010 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement.  A preliminary gap analysis has been drafted by the consultant and will be completed in early 2014/15 period.

A Coastal Processes study (Project 322) was completed for Napier/Hastings coastline in Hawke Bay and presented to Environment and Services Committee meeting on 9 April 2014.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The budget was under spent due to the delay in the Minister’s approval of the Regional Coastal Environment Plan.


Activity 3 – Policy Implementation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3 –Policy Implementation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will promote integrated management by proactively communicating its policies and responsibilities through dialogue and submissions on district plans, consent applications and central government initiatives

Lodging of submissions on district plans, district planning applications and central government initiatives where there are relevant regional council policies

 

2012-22

­ Submissions made on district plans, district planning applications and central government initiatives reported to HBRC’s Environment and Services Committee

­ Staff of HBRC and territorial local authorities to meet at least twice a year to discuss integration issues and steps to improve the regional and district plan are identified and acted upon

Partially achieved.

­ Regular reports on local statutory advocacy activities were presented to both the Maori and Environment and Services committees.

­ Submissions lodged in February 2014 on proposed Hastings District Plan and Napier City Council’s District Plan Change #10.

­ HB Council Planners’ Forum met once during the period.  Discussion focussed on RMA reforms, s35A RMA records of iwi authorities, e-planning, CDEM Group planning and reviews of the Hastings and Napier district plans which were publicly notified in November 2013.

­ No formal opportunities to make submissions on resource management legislative reviews or NESs arose during the 2013-14 period.  No new NPSs were proposed.  However, in November 2013, the Government proposed a suite of amendments to the NPS for Freshwater Management (NPSFM).  Council supported a sector-wide submission lodged by Local Government NZ in lieu of its own submission. Subsequently, the Government released the 2014 NPSFM which came into effect on 1 August 2014.

­ During the 2013-14 period, a number of senior staff have had increasing involvement in various groups liaising with Local Government NZ, Ministry for the Environment and other resource sector government ministries.  Much of that liaison is in relation to proposed RMA reforms, freshwater management and collaborative planning processes.

HBRC will help communities without sewers improve the management of domestic wastewater

Number of interest free loans approved

 

­ Provide a fund to help the territorial authority-led upgrading of community wastewater systems in communities without sewers ($200,000pa contributions capped at $1,000,000)

­ Non-regulatory initiatives developed and implemented to complement regional plan policy development that implements National Policy Statements and/or National Environmental Standards

Partially achieved.

There was no uptake on fund during reporting period.

While there were no specific non-regulatory initiatives developed (in Project 193) during the reporting period, a number of initiatives are being considered and developed in parallel to catchment-based regional plan changes (Project 192) such as Plan Change 6 for the Tukituki River Catchment.

HBRC will investigate and manage contaminated sites to ensure public health and safety and environmental protection

Number of top priority (Category 1) contaminated sites investigated

 

Maintain a database of potentially and confirmed contaminated sites

2012-22

­ To administer and maintain the database, including checking of record details, site visits to GPS areas of contamination, transfers to Territorial Local Authorities (TLA) as per agreed protocol and advising landowners of the contaminated sites status of their property

Achieved. Investigations of all Category 1 contaminated sites (13) were completed by December 2011.

Achieved.

Environmental Activities database completed and access given to Territorial Local Authorities to enable test runs of database. Meetings were held with Hastings District and Napier City Councils to progress transfer of information protocols. Checking of information on database continues, with the emphasis currently being on transferring information from the Pattle Delamore Partners (PDP) investigation report on the residential sites over the former Onekawa landfill onto the database.  The majority of the residential sites sampled by PDP have been classified as “partially investigated” but those sites not sampled will remain as “not investigated”. HBRC continues to receive requests from residents as to the status of their land.  The Environmental Activities database is to be updated to better co-ordinate with the recent changes to the internal HBRC records systems.

A major task will be the addition of residential subdivisions (individual lots) on former orchard land onto the database.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The Community Wastewater Fund has not been called on during the 2013-14 year.  Staff time for the Statutory Advocacy project (Project 196) has been significant ($203,000 compared to a budget of $133,000).  This internal time was largely due to growing involvement with Ministry for the Environment in initiatives for proposed resource management reforms and freshwater management processes.  Also, significant effort was involved in the review of Napier City Council’s Plan Change 10 and the proposed Hastings District Plan Review.

Significant external costs were incurred under Project 192 for Plan Change 6 evidence preparation and the budget was reforecast. Final costs were 107% of reforecast budget.


Activity 4 – State of the Environment Monitoring

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4 –State of the Environment Reporting

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will monitor and provide accurate information to the community so that it understands the State of the Environment (SOE) for Hawke’s Bay

Data quality as assessed against HBRC’s quality assurance system

 

Amount of State of the Environment monitoring data available through HBRC’s website.

2012-22

­ Maintain the current level of SOE data on HBRC’s website

­ Continue to make information from the following monitoring sites available through HBRC’s website:

·    All telemetered river flow sites

·    All telemetered rainfall sites

·    All telemetered climate stations

·    All data collected, processed, analysed and stored in accordance with ISO requirements

·    Maintain ISO accreditation

Partially achieved.

­ The current level of data availability has been maintained, and consideration is being given to expanding access to various data in response to stakeholder comments.

­ Data are being collected, processed and stored in accordance with the requirements of the ISO9001:2008-accredited Quality Management System.

Achieved.

The Quality Management System externally audited in December 2013.

State of the Environment Monitoring Report

2012-22

Annual Update State of the Environment Reports available by June each year

2013-14

State of the Environment Monitoring Report available

 

Partially achieved.

Preparation of the five-yearly State of Environment monitoring report is underway and will be complete in December 2014.  Priority will be given to the state of resources in the Tukituki, Mohaka and Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri management zones.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The $76k variance from budget in this activity was due to the reporting for State of the Environment being deferred into FY 2014-2015

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Land Drainage and River Control

Land drainage and river control activities focus on the management of the region’s rivers, streams and drainage network to reduce the effects of flooding in areas where there is significant risk to people and property. Much of this work relates to the maintenance of the flood control and drainage schemes which have been developed over many years. They now have a replacement value of more than $140 million.

Land drainage and river control covers the following inter-related programmes:

·      Flood protection and drainage schemes

·      Investigations and enquiries

·      Sundry works.

The empowering legislation for this function of the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC), is the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the Land Drainage Act 1908, the Local Government Act 2002 and the Civil Defence Emergency Act 2002.

 


 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Flood Protection and Drainage Schemes

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1a – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Heretaunga Plains Scheme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control network that provides protection from frequent river flooding to communities and productive land within the Heretaunga Plains Scheme

 

The level of protection in technical terms is to convey a flood discharge with a 1% probability of being exceeded in any one year (1%AEP) safely to the sea

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

2013-15

Review of the current level of service (LOS) provided by the Heretaunga Plains Scheme to determine whether they are still appropriate or should be increased

Achieved.

The report to Council in August 2011 outlined the economic analysis and options. Consultation with the public over the preferred option with cost implications was included in the LTP 2012-22.

There is 111.2 km of stopbank in the HP Scheme. Currently the design Level of Service (LOS) (1%AEP capacity) is provided.

There is 192.7 km of river berm edge protection. Current assessment is that the scheme provides 100% effectiveness and is at no more than a low risk of failure.

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Kilometres and percentage of floodway that provide the design level of service

2012-22

Tutaekuri, Ngaruroro & Lower Tukituki Audits: No change

 

HBRC will maintain an effective drainage network that provides protection from frequent flooding from smaller watercourses to communities and productive land within the Heretaunga Plains Scheme

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of the drainage network within each drainage catchment is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually.

2013-14 and 2014-15

Review the current level of service provided by the scheme and determine new level of service measures and targets

Partially Achieved.

The Level of Service (LOS) review for the drainage network is programmed to begin once the bulk of the review for the rivers is complete. This work commenced late in the financial year and will be progressed in the 14-15 financial year.

HBRC will protect and enhance the scheme’s riparian land and associated waterways administered by the Regional Council for public enjoyment and increased biodiversity

The level of service will be reported as the length of scheme riparian land enhanced. (Each side of a waterway measured separately and includes new planting and inter-planting)

Ongoing

0.5km of riparian land enhanced a year (on average)

Achieved

13,800 native and exotic plants were planted on the Tutaekuri, Ngaruroro and Lower Tukituki Rivers during the year. This planting is part of an ongoing programme to enhance the riparian zone of these rivers.

The Tutaekuri Ecological Management is essentially complete. The Tukituki plan is about 50% complete.  Implementation of EMP’s is ongoing. Gravel extractors are required to manage sites to allow for nesting birds.  Hapu input to these plans is progressing.

 


 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1b – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Upper Tukituki Scheme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control network that provides protection from frequent river flooding to communities and productive land within the Upper Tukituki Scheme

 

The level of protection in technical terms is to convey a flood discharge with a 1% probability of being exceeded in any one year (1%AEP) safely to the sea

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full Scheme Reviews

­ Upper Tukituki:  Start Date 2013/14; completion date 2014/15

 

Not achieved.

Annual maintenance of flood control scheme ongoing and managed through the annual contracts process.

Reviews are behind programme.  This review will not commence until late 2014/15 and is unlikely to be completed until at least the end of the 2015/16 financial year.

The November 2013 flood event which affected Onga Onga and the Makaretu River has highlighted an issue with gravel aggradation in some of the Rivers.  This issue will be included as part of the review.

An assessment of the fairness of the scheme classification upon which targeted rates liabilities are based will commence in the 2014/15 year.

Partially achieved.

There are 76.8 km of stopbanks in the Upper Tukituki Scheme. The current design LOS (1%AEP capacity) is provided over 95% of the stopbanked reaches.

The remaining 5% of reaches remain with reduced free board (distance between design flood level and the top of the stopbank) and these will be addressed in the LOS review.

There are 212.2 km of river berm edge protection. Current assessment is that 95% are at no more than a low risk of failure. The rivers in the Upper Tukituki Scheme suffer some flood damage from time to time or are under repair with young vegetation; hence the downgrading.

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Kilometres and percentage of floodway that provide the design level of service

2015-16

­ River Edge Risk: Review of the current level of service provided by the Scheme to determine whether they are still appropriate or should be increased

HBRC will protect and enhance its scheme riparian land and associated waterways for public enjoyment and increased biodiversity

The length of Scheme riparian land enhanced by inter-planting with alternative native and exotic species (each side of a waterway measured separately)

Ongoing

­ 0.5km of riparian land enhanced a year (on average)

 

 

Not achieved.

No additional planting was undertaken this financial year as the budget provision was utilised for flood repair works following the November flood event.

 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1c – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Other Schemes

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control and drainage network that provides protection from frequent flooding to communities and productive land within designated Scheme areas.  These Schemes include:

­  Makara Flood Control

­  Paeroa Drainage

­  Porangahau Flood Control

­  Ohuia – Whakaki Drainage

­  Esk River

­  Whirinaki Drainage

­  Maraetotara

­  Te Ngarue

­  Kopuawhara Flood Control

­  Poukawa Drainage

­  Kairakau (proposed)

­  Waimarama (proposed)

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

 

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Percentage of assets that provide the design level of service

2013-15

­  Kairakau and Waimarama Flood Protection Schemes accepted by community and operation phase begun

­  No change to other schemes

Partially Achieved.

Kairakau Community Scheme established and operating. Waimarama Scheme not yet established.

Current Levels of Service are being achieved across most the smaller schemes. Levels of Service vary across the schemes, depending on their purpose. Estimated to be operating at 95% or higher after allowing for periodic flood damage.

The Makara No1 dam repair was completed at a cost of $1.26 million. (Revised budget at completion of detailed design $1.28 million).

 

Financial Variances Explained

Additional expenditure against the upper Tukituki scheme for flood damage repairs made necessary following the November 2013 flood event and completion of construction of the Makara No 1 flood detention dam have been offset by savings in other schemes.  Of particular note:

1.   Expenditure was greater than budgeted as a result of timing for the design and reconstruction of the Makara No 1 dam. This dam repair was completed at a total cost of $1.262m compared to an estimated cost set out in the Statement of Proposal for consultation on the project of $1,208,000. Note this estimate was subsequently updated to $1.28m. Timing of the project did however vary from the initial programme resulting in cost variations in the 13-14 financial year.

2.   There is a reduction in expenditure on the Napier-Meeanee drainage area where some enhancement work has been deferred to allow the scheme operation account to recover from a significant deficit, and similarly with the Karamau drainage area. It should be noted that a provision is made within each scheme annual operating budget to allow for Council to respond to the rate payer enquires and unforeseen events. Every effort is made by asset management staff to minimise expenditure on these provisional items and this has resulted in a reduction in expenditure during the year.


Activity 2 – Investigations & Enquiries

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2 –Investigations and Enquiries

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will be available to provide expert advice on drainage, flooding, and coastal erosion issues

All queries are dealt with by appropriate qualified and experienced staff

Ongoing

­ No Change

Achieved.

Many flood, drainage and coastal queries are handled by staff

HBRC will provide up to a 30% subsidy for river control and flood protection where the criteria set out in the Regional Council’s guidelines for technical and financial assistance are met

Value of subsidies provided annually

Ongoing

­ $42,000 plus inflation of subsidy money is provided each year at a subsidy rate of 30%

 

Achieved.

2001

HBRC will provide a consultancy service for drainage, flooding, and coastal erosion issues according to individual project agreements on a full cost recovery basis

Cost recovery.

Satisfaction with Service

Ongoing

­ Full costs of any consultation work are recovered

­ Major clients are satisfied with service provided

Achieved.

Consultancy work has been undertaken throughout the year for Gisborne District Council, Hastings District Council and Napier City Council. Work has been well received by these councils.

A flood hazard study was completed for Panpac Whirinaki mill site

 

Financial Variances Explained

Cost varied from budget as follows.

1.   A reduction in demand for minor projects resulted in expenditure in this project of $40,000 compared to a budget of $140,000.

2.   An increase in demand for consultancy services resulted in expenditure increasing from a budgeted $152,000 to $203,000.  Income in these two projects changed accordingly.


Activity 3 – Sundry Works

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Sundry Works

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will ensure that the beach at Westshore has erosion checked to 1986 erosion line

(The 1986 line was the extent of erosion before beach renourishment began. This line is identified on a series of posts along the foreshore)

The comparison of annual beach cross section surveys to the 1986 erosion line

Ongoing

­ Erosion does not extend landward of the 1986 line

Achieved.

The annual nourishment project was successful in holding the Westshore coastline seaward of the 1986 measurements.  The 2013/14 renourishment work was completed as programmed.

HBRC will maintain river mouths so that they do not flood private land above a specified contour subject to suitable river, sea and weather conditions that will allow a safe and successful opening to be made

Incidences of flooding of private land above levels as specified in the River Opening Protocol

Ongoing

­ Private land above a specified contour is not flooded as a result of a river mouth being closed

Achieved.

There were no reported incidences of private land flooded as a result of a river mouth being closed.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.

­       


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Regional Resources

Regional Resources covers the region’s public shared resources (air, water, coast, gravel), its land resource (in private ownership) and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) owned property managed as a regional resource.

In relation to public shared resources, these activities include the gathering of information about them to improve their sustainable management, and efficient use.

In relation to the land resource, HBRC promotes sustainable land management and enhanced economic and environmental performance. HBRC also leverages government funding to support these initiatives.

In relation to Council-owned land, all activities aim to improve public access to these areas.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Land Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Land Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

Viable and resilient farming systems are being achieved through sustainable land use.

Annual reporting on research project outputs and how they have contributed to sustainable land management outcomes.

 

Ongoing

· Continue a programme of research and extension to investigate and field trial issues relevant to sustainable land management in Hawke’s Bay

Achieved

Focus of research and extension has been to inform process and programme development to implement the Tukituki Plan Change to achieve a cost effective reduction of phosphorus (P) and sediment; including:

- Coastal Hill Country ‘Group Recovering from April Adverse Storm’ Project – 4 farm case studies completed.

- Huatokitoki Project concluded with 2 successful field days (16 & 19 June – 50 participant including project partners and wider community) and the production of a research summary for the project.

- The Dryland Pastures research project has been successful in receiving 3 more years of funding with an aim to extrapolating the trial work to a greater variety of on-farm environments.

- High UMF Manuka research project  - This PGP programme is a $1.8m 5 year research programme designed to significantly increase the returns and performance of high UMF manuka plantations

- Papanui catchment nutrient loss research characterisation initiated in collaboration with the Science team, this includes

o 7 series of water quality measurements (32 sites)

o Soil map produced via Landcare Research

o Biophysical risk P matrix developed

- Landholder attitudinal and behavioural survey in the Papanui, Porangahau Stream, Maharakeke, Tukipo, Kahahakuri & upper Tuki Corridor catchments completed 2 November.

- East Coast Hill Country Resilience strategy development in collaboration with Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Primary Industries, AgResearch, Federated Farmers, Beef & Lamb, Horizons Regional Council, GW Regional Council, key consultants.

 

 

Actively seek collaboration with primary product organisations undertaking activities relevant to HB

Achieved

The Land management team continue to build strong alliances and relationships with our strategic partners at a national, regional and local level, including:

·    Dairy liaison meetings – 22 July 2013 & 8 July 2014

·    Pan-sector meetings – 9 July 2013 & 6 May 2014

·    Industry Good Practice – Phosphorous Memorandum of Understanding – signed by 10 pan-sector representatives as of 31/10/13

·    Meetings with over 30 national primary sector, research and central & regional government leaders in the development of the East Coast Hill Country Resilience proposal

·    LandWISE Board meetings x 2 + conference sponsorship and attendance May 2014.

·    LandWISE mircofarm field days 60+ people attended

·    Trees for Bees conference (March) – 100 attendees

·    HB Deer Farmers stakeholder meeting

·    NZ Institute of Forestry – July (150+ attendees)

·    NZ Farm forestry Association visit to Tutira Country park (40 attendees)

·    Critical source area and phosphorus management workshop – 6 May (30 attendees)

·    Feedlot issues meeting with affected land holders – 12 April

·    McCains field staff meeting

·    Kate McKinnon trained to deliver Beef & Lamb Land Environment Plans

·    Ministry for Primary Industry North Island Forestry Operations Group meetings

6 Meetings outlining PC6 to a range of primary sector groups and agricultural intermediaries (over 200 attendees)

 

Outputs achieved through HBRC Regional Landcare Scheme.

Ongoing

­ Report in the operation plan how RLS activity directly contributes to sustainable land management.

­ Annual output targets delivered from the RLS investment to be established and implemented as part of the annual operating plan.

RLS Achieved:

10 wetland restoration and protection projects funded

16 riparian projects funded

33 ha of indigenous bush protected

31,000 poles planted (135 properties)

2 coastal dune projects funded

4 research projects initiated

14 capacity building events to 800+ participants

16 catchment management meetings organised

·    Rangaiika dune complex protection project

·    Ahuriri lagoon protection in collaboration with DOC Bittern project

·    Lake Runanga program (20,000 trees planted)

Trees at cost project – 10,000 trees supplied 

 

The operational plan will show the focus of Regional Landcare Scheme activity and alignment with the Regional Afforestation programme and the intensification of land use.

 

­ A portion of Regional Landcare Scheme subsidy will be targeted, and the level of subsidy varied, to encourage initiatives that more effectively respond to environmental change.

Achieved

Approximately 40% of the RLS is now targeted to sub-catchments within the Tukituki

 

Area of erosion prone class Vle and Vlle hill country planted through the regional afforestation programme

 

2013/14

­ 500 ha planted

Not Achieved

This project is on hold due to the collapse in of the carbon credit market.

HBRC will increase its knowledge of the region’s land, soil and terrestrial habitats so it is aware of any current and likely future issues that may arise.  This knowledge will allow for a timely and effective response that enables land sustainably for future generations.

Regional baseline hill country erosion monitoring.

 

2013-14

­ Plains erosion monitoring programme to begin by December 2013.

­ Erosion monitoring repeated (about every 5 years but contingent on any major regional storm event).

Partially achieved.

Currently holding discussions with Landcare Research and AgResearch. Several modelling options are available and need to be reviewed. Plains erosion monitoring more difficult than expected and original methodology now considered not suitable for HB region. Next regional erosion base line survey due 2015-16.

Tukituki catchment sediment modelling has been completed with the results showing that a relatively small number of properties contribute the bulk of sediment. The modelling has significantly improved our knowledge of erosion in this particular area.

Partially achieved.

·    The Regional afforestation programme is on hold due to low carbon prices.

·    High UMF manuka is being trialled at Tutira as a possible opportunity for steep erodible hill country land use.  A total of 140ha has been planted over the past 3 years.  Production from the block will be monitored with sufficient data collected to enable the initiative to be fully assessed in 2018.

HBRC is participating in the High UMF Primary Growth Partnership

 

Integrated catchment management including staged computer modelling and monitoring of the:

­  Mohaka

­  Heretaunga/Ahuriri

­  Tukituki

 

2013-15

­ Catchment models developed for Taharua and the entire Mohaka catchment.

­ Catchment models developed for Heretaunga area.

Achieved

The LM team led development of integrated catchment management in the Taharua/Mohaka and Tutaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro & Karamu catchment through:

- Providing nutrient modelling science support and farm systems interpretation and analysis

- Facilitating industry participation and input into plan change and program processes

- Facilitating and managing catchment stakeholder processes and participation in the design of local solutions to water quality problems e.g. Taharua catchment

- Providing guidance on the practicalities, implications and economic impact of permitted activity rules and policies on landholders within catchments

- Producing implementation plans and processes to drive the implementation of policy, rules and regulation on-ground

- Facilitating development of sub-catchment community based strategies to deal with significant water quality challenges in the Taharua and Papanui catchments

Nutrient model developed by NIWA for the Taharua/Mohaka catchment. This model establishes relationships between nitrogen (N) losses from land and N concentrations in stream.  Model development and performance was reported by NIWA in 2011/12 (available via the HBRC website http://www.hbrc.govt.nz/About-this-Site/Pages/contact-us.aspx). Additional data collected in 2012-13 and 2013-14 will allow recalibration of the model (for N), and extension of model capability. Initial modelling completed. Second stage began May 2014 with completion expected by 2015.

This model framework will be adapted and used to predict growth of attached algae (periphyton) in response to surface water concentrations of N in rivers in the Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri Plan Change area during 2014-15.

Also, a novel two-stage process, based on desk-top assessment of riparian areas using aerial photographs in a Geographic Information System (GIS), previously developed to determine riparian condition will allow Council staff to efficiently identify areas where riparian improvement is possible.

The methodology was trialled in the Tukituki River catchment to provide information to underpin policy developed for Plan Change 6 and will be applied to areas within the greater Heretaunga Plan Change area in 2014-15.

Hawke’s Bay’s land resource is maintained for future generations

­ Area of erosion prone land with tree cover

 

­ Baseline erosion monitoring

See Regional Afforestation Scheme targets

Achieved

Baseline erosion monitoring programme is carried out every 5 years with the next phase programmed for 2015-16. If a major storm event occurs this date will be moved forward to record that event.

 

Financial Variances Explained

A variation in actual expenditure to budget occurred as a result of changed in three research projects Hill Country Erosion, Huatokitoki, and East Coast Drylands. The scope of each of these projects was reduced following negotiations with MPI. Budget was $410,000 and actual spend was approx. $200,000. Income was correspondingly reduced.

 


Activity 2 – Air Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2–Air Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will have adequate knowledge about the level of air pollutants that may impact on public health and aesthetic values so that it can manage air quality for human health needs and aesthetic values.

 

State of the Environment monitoring programme for:

­ Air quality

­ Climate

 

2012-22

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with the Regional Air Quality Monitoring Strategy.

 

2012-22

­ Report on breaches of the National Environmental Standards (NES) in accordance with the standard.

Achieved

PM10 concentrations[3] were continuously monitored in the Napier, Hastings and Awatoto airsheds.  The following performance targets were met:

­  less than 5% of data missing, and

­  75% or more valid data (less than 25% of measured and archived values affected by calibration and instrument fault events). 

PM10 screening equipment operated in Waipawa for a period of one year, from December 2012 to December 2013, to determine the requirement for routine continuous monitoring. The NES for PM10 was not exceeded during that time and as a result there are no plans to implement continuous monitoring.

A campaign monitoring concentrations of traffic-related NES contaminants in Napier and Hastings was completed in August.  These contaminants include nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and ozone.  The concentrations recorded were within the standards.

Achieved

Public health notices were issued for 22 exceedances of the NES for PM10 since 1 July 2013.  Hastings had 15 exceedances, Napier recorded 5 and Awatoto had 2.

HBRC will provide financial assistance for those who qualify for insulation and clean heat support.

Number of clean heat systems installed under financial assistance programme.

2012-22

­ Up to 1500 ‘clean heat’ systems installed each year under HBRC’s financial assistance programme

­ Provide loan assistance to homeowners region wide for home insulation and clean heat under HBRC’s financial assistance programme.

Achieved

2014 was a phase out year for pre-1996 fires and higher than average demand was expected. The reforecast volumes were increased, however, due to effective marketing, demand has exceeded revised expectations.

Hawke’s Bay’s air is suitable to breathe

Compliance with National Environmental Standard (NES) for Air Quality

­ Napier Airshed meets NES: No more than one exceedance by 2016

­ Hastings Airshed meets NES: No more than three exceedances by 2016 and no more than one exceedance by 2020.

2013 -2014

  5 exceedances were measured in Napier.

  15 exceedances were measured in Hastings.

  2 exceedance was measured in Awatoto.

 

Partially Achieved

It is unlikely the targets will be achieved by 2016, but if current uptake to replace non compliant fires is maintained the 2020 target is achievable.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The Heatsmart project continues to perform ahead of target with the increased cost for clean heating loans being partially offset by a reduced demand for insulation loans.

Internal borrowing was used to cover the increased cost of clean heat grants, which resulted in an unfavourable financial variance against plan.

 


Activity 3 – Water Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Water Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will increase its knowledge of the region’s water resources in terms of quantity, quality and habitats so that a policy framework can be developed to sustainably manage the water and land resources within Hawke’s Bay.

State of the Environment monitoring programme for:

·  Climate

·  River flows

·  Groundwater levels

·  Surface water quality

·  Groundwater water quality

·  Aquatic ecosystems

2013-15

­ Establish 1 climate station a year in response to identified requirement.

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with State of the Environment monitoring strategy (reviewed in 2013/14 to reflect national reporting and regional consistency).

­ Upgrade rainfall sites as required to maintain level of service.

Achieved.

­ One climate station was installed at “Pukeoropa”.

­ The “Glenwood” and “Ben Nevis” stations were upgraded, and work is under way at the “Pukeoropa” and “Kotemaori” stations to automate data transfer.

­ A rainfall measurement site was installed at the “Makaroro link” station.

Partially achieved

­ Surface water quality and quantity, groundwater quality and level, climate, rainfall and fresh and saline-water ecological monitoring programmes continue according to schedule.  These data will contribute to the five-yearly SoE monitoring report that will be completed in 2014.

Knowledge available to inform environmental flow and allocatable volume review of the following river catchments and groundwater basins:

Tukituki River; Ngaruroro River; Karamu Stream; Tutaekuri River; Ruataniwha Plains ; Heretaunga Plains.

2013-15

·  Groundwater abstraction and allocation report prepared for Heretaunga Plains.

·  Environmental flow, and allocation reports prepared for the:

·   Karamu Stream, Tutaekuri River, Ngaruroro River and inflows to the Ahuriri Estuary

·  Capability required of groundwater model confirmed by defining specifications.

Partially achieved

­ A draft Groundwater abstraction and allocation report was prepared for the area of the Heretaunga Plains covered approximately by the Karamu Stream catchment.

­ Groundwater use and allocation data is a key input to the coupled surface-groundwater model currently being developed for the Greater Heretaunga management zone.

­ The technical requirements of the coupled surface-groundwater model have been identified.  Documentation of the technical specifications and further defining of technical requirements/objectives for subsequent modelling still pending.

Knowledge available to inform review of water quality objectives and setting limits.

2013-15

­ Review of water quality guidelines and objectives completed and reported.

­ Water quality requirements identified for recognised values, including aquatic habitat, established for Heretaunga Plan Change catchments (Tutaekuri and Ngaruroro Rivers, Ahuriri and Karamu Streams).

Partially achieved

­ A range of technical investigations are currently underway to identify water quality requirements for the Tutaekuri and Ngaruroro Rivers and Ahuriri and Karamu Streams.  These include ecological assessments, nutrient limitation studies and assessments of dissolved oxygen concentrations in spring-fed streams on the Heretaunga Plains. Analysis and reporting completed by the end of 2014.

Knowledge available to manage nutrient inputs to rivers.

2013-15

­ Report on Nutrient limits: Ngaruroro River, Tutaekuri.

Partially achieved

­ Nutrient limit assessment studies continue in the Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri River catchments.  These are key to describing the relationships between nutrient concentrations and freshwater ecological responses.

HBRC will increase its knowledge in terms of potential regional water demand and availability and how it is valued so that it can strategically plan for regional economic, social, cultural and environmental benefits.

Regional Water Values study.

 

Undertake a study to assess the value of water from a social, environmental, economic and cultural perspective and review funding policy for HBRC’s water related activities.

Achieved.

­ Regional freshwater values assessments have been completed for a range of values including Salmonid angling, Natural character, Native fish, and Native birdlife, Irrigation, Whitewater kayaking and Swimming.

­ Cultural freshwater values assessments have also been completed for the Tukituki catchment.

Partially achieved

­ Further regional environmental and economic values assessments have also begun.

HBRC will encourage efficient and effective water use to maximise the benefits of the water allocated.

Number of active water user groups.

 

Implementation of water efficiency tools by Water User Groups.

2013-22

­ Continue to establish and facilitate Water User Groups on a catchment priority basis.

­ In conjunction with Water User Groups, investigate and apply for research grants relating to water use and resource allocation efficiency.

­ Continue to transfer latest water efficiency and allocation information to Water User Groups.

Achieved.

­ Water User Groups are established in the Ruataniwha, Twyford and Ngauroro.

In progress.

­ Acting on interest/need to establish additional water user groups in the Heretaunga Plains

­ Grant application for Twyford area is being progressed although work is continuing to progress where possible

­ Promoted efficient and effective water use via irrigation training

 

Number of consent holders with water meters operating using telemetry or web/text systems.

2013-2014

­ Cumulative total of 1000 consents using telemetry or a web entry system.

Achieved

­ This project is ahead of schedule.  Currently water use for 1260 consents is being reported using either HBRCs web-entry system (750) or telemetry (510).

Work has continued with the Ngaruroro Irrigation Society by way of assisting with meetings. Work with Twyford has mainly centred on political change but is now back on track to getting water limitation solutions for irrigators. Both of these groups are involved in the Greater Heretaunga plan change TANK group.  Work with the Ruataniwha group has mainly been via the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme and Tukituki Plan Change.

Allocation limits and water quality limits.

 

Implementation of National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management.

Refer to other performance targets listed within this table.

Partially achieved

­ Much of the surface and groundwater monitoring and investigation work will be used for limit setting purposes.

­ Access to real-time high quality water use data (through the consent metering project) will be key to improving water use and management.

 

Financial Variances Explained

An increase in staff time in some projects (projects 310 and 315) and internal over/under recoveries has created a slight increase in cost for this area of activities.  Staff hours increased in response to demand from large policy processes associated with the Tukituki Catchment Project.

 


Activity 4 – Coastal Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4–Coastal Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will measure water quality at key recreation sites and make the results available to ensure public health and safety

Recreational water quality monitoring programme and website management

 

Ongoing

­ Weekly monitoring of key recreational sites as per recreational water quality monitoring plan

­ Recreational water information available on website and social network site within two days of results being available

­ Identification of pollution sources for sites that regularly exceed guidelines.

Achieved

Recreational water quality monitoring commenced on 4/10/2013 and was completed on the 17/03/14.

Monitoring data reported within the required timeframes on all occasions.

Faecal source tracking analysis allowed for pollution sources to be identified at a number of sites with on-going exceedances.

HBRC will continue to monitor, research and investigate coastal processes to inform coastal planning including climate change and coastal hazards.

 

Annual coastal monitoring and investigation programme including:

­ Beach profiling

­ Storm monitoring

­ Sediment transport and processes investigation and modelling.

­ Hazard prediction including tsunami, inundation, erosion, storm surge

Ongoing

­ Annual monitoring and investigation programme completed and reported each year

Achieved

Annual surveys of beach cross section series was completed Dec/Jan.

The annual report has been completed.

A report titled “Global Climate Change & Beach-barrier responses” authored by Komar and Harris has been completed and published. HBRC have received agreement from Napier City and Hastings District Councils to develop a Coastal Strategy for the coast between Clifton and Tangoio. The objective is to consider how best to manage the coast given climate change and the potential for this to impact on the community.

HBRC will provide long term, relevant and specific information on Hawke’s Bay’s coastal ecosystems, so that it and the community can remain engaged with, and informed of, the current state and potential threats to the health of coastal environments.

Identify the state and health of selected regional beaches, reefs and estuaries;

Identify the state and health of near-shore coastal waters and coastal sediments;

Maintain an operative and relevant Coastal Monitoring Strategy.

Ongoing

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with State of the Environment Monitoring Strategy (2006) and reported on annually.

2013-14

­ Five-year State of the Environment report compiled

Achieved

­ Quarterly reef monitoring surveys for Kairakau, Te Mahia and Hardinge Road reef is currently in progress.

­ Monitoring of four beaches and four estuaries completed in March 2014.

­ Preparation of the five-yearly State of Environment monitoring report is currently under way. To be completed by end of 2014.

HBRC will increase its knowledge of coastal ecosystems through targeted research and investigations so that it is better able to understand and respond to the effects of activities on the coastal environment.

Undertaking specific investigation and/or research, and reporting on these outcomes where appropriate

­ Targeted investigations into coastal receiving environments receiving stormwater discharges.

­ Saline transition zones in Wairoa, Esk, Maungawhio and Pakuratahi Estuaries will be investigated (weather dependent).

Partially achieved.

­ A project plan has been developed to deliver this information for the Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri management zone during 2013/14.

­ Salinity loggers have been deployed in the Porangahau, Tukituki blind arm, Nuhaka, Wairoa, Waikari and Mohaka river estuaries to determine sea water incursion under lower-flow conditions.

 

Financial Variances Explained

An increase in staff time in project 331, external cost associated with contractors and internal over/under recoveries has created an increase in cost for this area of activities.  Staff hours and external costs increased in response to demand from large policy processes associated with the Tukituki Catchment Project.

 


Activity 5 – Gravel Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 5– Gravel Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will monitor and manage river-bed sediment to ensure flood protection schemes work as expected.

River surveys (3-6 yearly) show all scheme rivers have sufficient capacity.

Ongoing

­ No decline in river flood capacity.

Partially achieved

Cross section survey programmed for the 2013-14 year was completed except for a portion of the Waiau River which is approximately 90% complete.

River bed gravel extraction volumes have reduced significantly over the past several years due to the economic down turn. The impacts of this are most noticeable on the upper Tukituki rivers where gravel build-up is reported to be resulting in reduced drainage on their properties.

Options for mitigating this are being worked through.

The average riverbed level where gravel extracted is managed within +/- 200mm of the design grade line.

Ongoing

­ Average riverbed within design grade range.

 

Achieved

Done in conjunction with survey – see below.

No incidences of erosion or flooding as a result of undesirable gravel levels.

Ongoing

­ No incidences.

 

Not achieved

Flooding occurred in November 2013 on land adjacent to the Makaretu River as a result of bed levels being 0.8m above desirable grade level.  A number of other complaints from land owners adjacent to other Upper Tukituki rivers are being investigated

River-bed gravel is equitably allocated to gravel extractors.

The gravel allocation process complies with the Regional Resource Management Plan

Ongoing

­ No compliance issues with gravel extraction.

Achieved

The gravel allocation process has complied with the RRMP and there are no compliance issues.  The gravel allocation process for the 2014/15 year has commenced and is programmed for completion May 2014.

River gravel management activities have no significant adverse effects on river ecology and water quality.

No reported incidences of adverse impacts following gravel extraction or beach raking activities.

Ongoing

­ No reported incidences of adverse impacts following gravel extraction or beach raking activities.

 

Achieved

328,670m3 gravel was extracted over the year.  104 consents were issued.  Gravel extraction has been managed to avoid adverse impacts on the ecology. Ecology management plans (EMP’s) for the Ngaruroro and Tutaekuri have been developed and for the other major rivers are currently being developed to manage the ecology more effectively. Gravel extractors are aware of the requirements of the EMP.

Knowledge necessary for sustainable management of riverbed gravel is improved.

Completion of investigation and research work recommended in riverbed gravel scoping study.

Ongoing

­ Annual Programme of work completed.

Achieved

Modelling work is progressing to study gravel movement in Tukituki and Ngaruroro Rivers. This year work has proceeded on the Tukituki model. Much of the work to date has centred around the effects of the Haumoana groyne proposal and the sediment availability as requested by Council. The model is being extended to cover the next reach. Very useful results are being obtained from this work which will inform decisions on sustainable management of the gravel resource in the future.

 

Financial Variances Explained

A significant portion of funding for this area of work is forward from fees charged for gravel extraction from the region’s rivers. Demand for gravel has been lower than anticipated during the year so work on the sustainable gravel management project was reduced to fit a received income expectation.

 


Activity 6 – Open Spaces

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 6–Open Spaces

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will provide public access to, and manage existing Council owned parks and wetlands for multi-purpose benefits.

Levels of service associated with all open space areas are set out in current management plans.

Ongoing

­ Maintain a current Open Space Vision and Management Plan and, where appropriate, further development programmes for all open space areas and facilities.

 

Ongoing

­ Implement management plans to deliver levels of service established.

Achieved.

Regional Open Space network plan adopted by Council November 2013.  Plans for a number of individual open space areas are being reviewed.

 

 

 

Current management plans for individual open space areas are being implemented. 

HBRC will actively look for opportunities to provide the public with opportunities to enjoy open space available within the region with opportunities assessed against the HBRC Open Space policy and evaluation criteria.

Open space policy and evaluation criteria.

 

Note $915,000 remaining in HBRC open space and community facilities to provide for opportunities.

Ongoing

­ Continue to assess affordable open space opportunities in accordance with the open space vision.

­ Action any opportunities approved by Council.

 

2013-14

­ Investigate open space development opportunities with the region’s territorial authorities that align with visitor facilities and attractions and meet policy and evaluation criteria.

 

No opportunities are currently being pursued.

 

 

 

 

 

It is proposed that a borrowing facility be retained to enable development opportunities within existing open space areas to be considered and if approved, to be funded.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Regulation

Regulation activities cover the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) regulatory functions for resource use, building dams and safe navigation of the region’s navigable waters.

The empowering legislation for HBRC functions include the Resource Management Act 1991, the Local Government Act 2002, the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the Building Act 2004, the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, and the Maritime Transport Act 1994.

 

 

 


 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Resource Consent Processing

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Resource Consent Processing

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will ensure that accurate information about resource consent requirements and processes is readily available.

Application and submission guides are available in electronic and hard copy form.

 

2012-22

­ No verified reports of inaccurate information being given in relation to resource consent requirements.

2012-22

­ Electronic application and submission forms, application and submission guides are available through HBRC’s website.

Achieved

Staff continue to maintain up-to-date application forms and information.

 

Achieved

Guidance for change of ownership relating to water permits prepared and distributed.

Electronic application forms are available through the web

HBRC will process resource consent applications in a timely manner.

100% of resource consents processed within statutory timeframes set down in the Resource Management Act 1991.

2012-22

­ 100% of resource consents processed within statutory timeframes.

Achieved

All consents have been processed within statutory timeframes.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were variances from the budget in this activity. The principal excedence was against the budgeted provision for appeals/objections. The budget provision for this activity was $53,951 while the total costs for the year amounted to $119,615. Other activities within the budget were not sufficient to offset these costs.

The provision for appeals was exceeded due to the Environment Court Appeal against the Mexted et al development at Mahanga by Mahanga E Tu Inc ([2014] NZEnvC 83 Mahanga E Tu Inc v Hawke’s Bay Regional Council). This appeal has been going on for over 4 years and it has been difficult to anticipate the cost of Councils participation in this process. The actual hearing has been pending but came up in March. Staff did not anticipate the full cost of the legal and expert witnesses and their attendance at the appeal hearing which was held in Gisborne. The external cost for this amounted to $112,495 for the year.

The Mahanga E Tu appeal is concluded but for settling of conditions. There will only be minor costs of an estimated $2,000 to conclude this.

While there is budget for appeals, the number of appeals are normally very few. Now that the Mahanga E Tu appeal has been concluded the only appeal against HBRC resource consents is the appeal to the High Court against the RWSS consents. The Consents section does not anticipate being involved in this appeal. At this stage there is very little cost anticipated against this budget item for the coming year. This can however change.

 


Activity 2 – Compliance Monitoring

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2–Compliance Monitoring

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will check that consent holders comply with the resource consent conditions imposed to protect the environment.

Number of consents monitoring in accordance with the adopted compliance monitoring strategy.

2012-22

­ 90% of programmed inspections/reports completed each year.

­ 95% of monitored consents achieve an overall grading of full compliance.

Achieved

662 consents monitored out of 812 programmed for the 2013-14 year plus 1589 water takes monitored in conjunction with Water Information Services. 93% of programmed work was undertaken.

99% of monitored consents achieved a final overall grading of full compliance.

HBRC will provide a 24 hr/7 day a week pollution response service for reporting environmental problems.

Duty management/Pollution Management response system.

2012-22

­ 24 hour duty Management/pollution management response system maintained.

Achieved

Ongoing service provided

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget in the monitoring activity, however a significant increase in the number of reported pollution incidents and investigation of those resulted in a $109,000 unfavourable variance in the pollution response activity.

 


Activity 3 – Maritime Safety & Navigation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Maritime safety and Navigation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

 HBRC will provide local navigation safety control of shipping and small craft movements to ensure the region’s navigable waters are safe for people to use.

The Navigation Safety Bylaws and Port and Harbour Safety Management System.

2012-22

­ Bylaws to be reviewed in 2016.

­ Maintain a Maritime New Zealand accredited Safety Management System for the Napier Pilotage Area.

­ Marine accidents and incidents are investigated and acted upon using education and enforcement as appropriate.

 

­ Region wide risk assessment and review of current work programme with forward looking recommendations by 1 July 2013.

 

­ Review community education effectiveness by 1 July 2013.

Achieved

Safety Management System has been audited by MNZ. Audit passed with no corrective actions required.

 

Achieved

Incidents have been investigated with education and enforcement action used where appropriate.

 

Achieved

Region wide risk assessment completed.

 

Achieved

Reviewed with Continued Coastguard delivery of Community Education programme. Additional strategies employed including media releases and children’s competitions. Prizes donated by local businesses. Successful presence at Waimarama Beach Day and sponsorship of a wearable arts competition with a navigational safety theme.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.

 


Activity 4 – Building Act Implementation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4–Building Act Implementation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

Process Building Act consent applications within timeframes.

Contract with Waikato Regional Council to process dam consents on behalf of Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC).

2012-22

­ Maintain contract with Waikato Regional Council, for the processing of dam building consents.

Achieved

Contract maintained.

Maintain an accurate Dam Register and help dam owners prepare dam safety assurance programmes in accordance with Building Act timeframes.

All known dams have been recorded on the Dam Register, and dam owners informed of Building Act requirements.

2012-22

­ 100% of dams comply with regulation requirements that come into force in July 2012.

Not Achieved

No action, regulations still not in force. Latest date is 1 July 2015

HBRC will investigate illegally built dams and will ensure that they are removed or made compliant.

An illegally built dam is made compliant or removed within six months of identification.

2012-22

­ 100% of dams comply with regulations.

Achieved

No illegal dams [as defined under the Act] identified.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.

 

­       


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Biosecurity

Animal and plant pest control is carried out in accordance with Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) Regional Pest Management Strategy and the National Strategy for Bovine Tuberculosis (Tb).

Biosecurity covers the following inter-related programmes:

·      Regional animal pest control

·      Regional plant pest control

·      Pest management strategies.

The relevant legislation for this Activity is the Biosecurity Act 1993.

 



HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Regional Biosecurity Programmes

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Regional Biosecurity Programme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will develop and implement regional pest management strategies that improve biodiversity and economic prosperity.

Pest Management Strategies

Maintain a current Regional Pest Management Strategy.

2013-2014

­ Review the current Regional Pest Management Strategy (RPMS) and complete new Plan by 2015

Progressing

The Regional Pest Management Plan (RPMP) and Regional Phytosanitary Pest Management Plan have been reviewed with both strategies sealed by Council in March 2013. A further review required following amendments to the Biosecurity Act of the RPMP is on track for completion in 2015.

A number of initiatives underway will inform the next review of the RPMP. These initiatives include considering how more effective biosecurity risk management may take place for the Horticulture, pipfruit and viticulture sectors, how “Good Neighbour” rules may be used along boundaries with Crown estate and what the options there may be to integrate additional top predator pests into HBRC’s possum control area programme. Development of the cost benefit analysis that is required for each pest to underpin any decision for HBRC intervention in the management of that pest are also well advanced.

Undertake research and investigation to quantify and/or increase the economic, biodiversity or animal/human health benefits of pest control.

Ongoing

­ Undertake at least one research/investigation initiative annually.

Achieved

There were five research projects successfully completed. These included a grass forage trial (rabbits – Tutira/Opouahi), wide scale predator control biodiversity outcomes monitoring (Opouahi), feral cat camera monitoring trial (NZ first of its kind research to establish a monitoring technique for predators), toxoplasmosis research, and farmer uptake focus groups research for wide scale predator control (Cape to City).

HBRC will provide effective pest management programmes that improve regional biodiversity and economic prosperity.

 

Regional Animal Pest Control and Bovine Tb Vector Control Programmes

Hectares of rateable land kept at low possum numbers. Low possum numbers means no more than five possums caught per 100 traps set out at night.

­ By 2016 all rateable land will be reduced to low possum numbers (total rateable land in Hawke’s Bay = 1,000,000 ha).

 

Rateable land in transition from the Animal Health Board programme:

2013-14:  16,000 ha

2014-15:  80,000 ha

2015-16:  30,000 ha

 

Rateable land in Possum Control Area (PCA) Programme:

June 2013:  490,000 ha

June 2014:  507,000 ha

 

Of the PCAs monitored, less than 10% of the monitoring lines exceed 5% trap catch.

Achieved

At 30 June 2013 a total area of 907,740 ha of rateable land is being kept at low possum numbers. This comprises 507,740ha’s under HBRC’s possum control area (PCA) programme and approximately 400,000 ha of AHB vector control operations under the TBfree NZ programme. Possum initial control has been completed across 98% of productive land within the region.

An area of 16,304 ha was transitioned from the TBfree programme to HBRCs PCA programme in the 2013/14 year. 

Education and Trend monitoring utilising chew cards has been completed across 52,474 hectares (10.3% of possum control area programme). Of the 310 monitoring lines completed 24 or 7.7% of these lines exceeded 5% rtc.

The number of active rook nests treated annually across the region.

 

Ongoing

­ Monitoring indicates a downward trend in active rook nest numbers in both areas (North and South of SH5).

 

Achieved

Aerial rook control has been carried out and completed in all known rookeries across the region during the 2013 rook breeding season. An additional 26 new rookeries where located across the region, 3 in the eradication zone and 23 in the control zone.

A total of 95 active nests were aerial treated across the eradication zone north of SH5.

A total of 448 active nests were aerial treated across the control zone south of SH5 compared with 686 in the 2012/2013 financial year.

Ten rook enquires were responded during the year.

Response time to rabbit complaints/enquiries.

 

Ongoing

­ An initial response is given within 5 working days of receipt of each rabbit related complaint/enquiry

 

Achieved

Fifty rabbit enquires were received and followed up.  All enquires have been responded to within 5 working days of receiving their initial call.  Assistance was provided in the form of environmental topic’s, one on one advice, and where appropriate a demonstration on best use of either Pindone rabbit pellets or magtoxin, which is used for fumigating rabbit borrows.

McLean Scale four indicates that there are pockets of rabbits with signs and fresh burrows very noticeable.

One property has ongoing rabbit management plans for 2014/15 with initial control scheduled for the winter of 2014.

Responsiveness to properties identified with rabbit populations over McLean Scale 4.

Ongoing

­ A management plan is prepared within four months for each property identified with rabbit numbers above McLean Scale 4.

Plant Pest Control

Routine plant pest inspections of areas infested with plants controlled under HBRC Regional Pest Management Strategy.

 

Ongoing

­ All known infestations of ‘occupier responsibility’ Total Control plant pest sites are visited annually

­ All known ‘service delivery’ Total Control plant pest sites are visited annually and plants controlled

­ All Privet sites identified through complaints controlled within 6 months of complaint

­ The land around all known infestations of Total Control plants is inspected at least every 3 years

­ All areas of high potential risk are visited annually and checked for possible new plant pest incursions

Achieved

Total Control Service delivery visits and control were undertaken on Spiny emex, African feather grass, goats rue, phragmites, yellow water Lilley and White edged nightshade by Council officers. Control work has been completed by contractors for Nassella tussock.

The urban Privet programme has had a total of 261 properties (65 in Wairoa) where Privet has been removed by the contractor or council staff.

A total of 2428 visits were made this year on total control plant pest properties. Of these 1148 were urban visits. Occupiers have undertaken control principally on Apple of Sodom, Old Man’s Beard, Chilean needle grass, Cotton thistle, Pinus Contorta, Japanese honeysuckle, Australia sedge, and Woolly nightshade.

Fluproponate (Taskforce) has been used for two years now on Chilean needle grass with the benefits of using it starting to show.  However there are still some issues to work on with this product. A ‘Best Practise’ on how to use this chemical will be developed in conjunction with other Councils. The aerial application of the chemical has been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Residue and efficacy trials required by EPA are underway to support the retention of Taskforce’s registration.

A monitoring and control programme has continued for Darwin’s barberry in the two known infested areas (Puketitiri and Wakarara), and for Boneseed on the coast south of Cape Kidnappers.

Leaflets were distributed for Blue passionflower in the Taradale and Clive area. Control for Blue passionflower has started. Inspections have been carried out on land around known infestations of other total control plants, as time has allowed.

Two Notices of Direction were issued. These were issued to land users with a high likelihood of Chilean Needle grass on their properties who wanted to sell hay off the property.

A total of 22 Earthmoving machines/mowers were inspected after being washed down before leaving infected sites.

 


Financial Variances Explained

During the financial year an additional part time staff member was employed to determine the level of pest control activity currently being undertaken by land owners who have chosen not to service their properties using a contractor. These property owners were seen as a potential risk to the on-going integrity of HBRC’s possum control programme covering approximately 500,000ha of productive land throughout the region. Feedback from this activity was extremely positive with the vast majority of land owners actively undertaking pest control on their own property and strongly supporting council’s initiative to maintain low possum numbers throughout the region.

HBRC funds 10% of the TBfree vector management and control programme in Hawke’s Bay. At the end of each financial year TBfree NZ review the actual percentage chargeable in relation to the work programme delivered in HB compared to the rest of NZ and do and end of year correction.  This year TBfree NZ has determined that the HB contribution is less than 10%.  This is reflected in the reduced charge.

 

­       


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Emergency Management

Emergency Management covers a range of activities to meet Civil Defence and natural hazard management responsibilities.

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) administers both the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group and the Coordinating Executive Group, both of which have responsibilities for the implementation of the Hawke’s Bay Group Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan.

The Vision of the Group is A Resilient Hawke’s Bay Community.  The activities undertaken to achieve this aim to: identify potential hazards to the community and the means of reducing their impact; prepare the community for potential civil defence emergencies; and assist with the response to and recovery from any emergencies that occur.

The relevant legislation for this function of HBRC is the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 and the Resource Management Act 1991.

 


 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – HB Civil Defence Emergency Management Group

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– HB Civil Defence Emergency Management Group

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will reduce the impact of long term natural and man-made hazards to life and property, eliminating these risks if practicable, and if not seek the reduction of their impact.

Assessment of natural and manmade hazards will be completed for at risk areas in Hawke’s Bay.

2012-22

­ Advocate to Territorial Authorities for the consideration and inclusion of hazard information as part of their land use planning functions

­ In conjunction with TAs, provide public advice on the impacts of hazards

­ Complete changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 statutory plans that reflect the integrated approach of the Joint Hazard Strategy

Partially Achieved

Currently working with HBRC Strategy and Policy Group to develop a change to the RPS to implement a risk based approach and strengthen the requirement for TLAs to consider the impacts of natural hazards when considering land use changes.

Facilitated Napier Tsunami Evacuation Planning Workshop March 2014.

On-line hazard database has been maintained on the HBRC website.

Submission made to the HDC proposed District Plan on strengthening their risk reduction through land use planning.

Number of hazards research projects commissioned each year.

2012-22

­ At least one new research project commissioned each year

Achieved

A project commissioned to review the liquefaction potential in Hawke’s Bay, with the CDEM Group leading a partnership of all Hawke’s Bay Councils, local IPENZ members and GNS.  The project has run over 2 years and is to be completed by June 2015.  Access has also been provided to the CGD for HB geotechnical assessments.

Results of an Active Fault Mapping project for CHB prepared 2013 was presented to CHBDC by GNS on 13 March 2014.

A project was completed providing Level 2 tsunami mapping for remote coastal areas in HB based on the findings of the National Tsunami Risk Review Sept 2013.

A review of the 10-year HB CDEM Hazard Research Plan was commissioned with a workshop hosted May 2014.  The final report is due in late 2014.

Percentage of surveyed residents that are aware of hazard risks & can identify earthquake, flooding, and tsunami as major hazards in Hawke’s Bay.

2012-22

­ Awareness of earthquake, flooding/heavy rainfall and tsunami hazard risks show an increase over time

­ Specific target more than 50% of residents can identify tsunami as one of the region’s major hazards by 2018

­ As measured in a 3 year survey

Achieved

The most recent regional survey in 2013, undertaken on behalf of Council by SIL Research, asked residents to identify hazard risks to their livelihood:

·    93% identified earthquake

·    62% identified flooding/heavy rain

·    51% identified tsunami, up from 33% in 2008

Satisfaction of Territorial Authorities and professionals involved in land use planning decision making with the quality, format & relevance of hazard information supplied.

2012-22

­ All Territorial Authorities and planning professionals are satisfied with the quality, format and relevance of hazard information supplied/available as assessed by an evaluation and feedback form every 3 years

Achieved

A HB Hazard Research Survey was sent out to the TLA and some other key professionals involve in land use planning decision making with results compiled in Sept 2013.  75% of respondents were satisfied (rating either good, very good or excellent) with the quality of hazard information they received.  100% said the information was relevant.

HBRC will maintain and where appropriate increase the readiness of Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (HBCDEM) and the community to respond to a civil defence emergency.

 

HBRC response to a Civil Defence emergency is coordinated, appropriate, effective and efficient.

 

2012-22

­ Complete the Review of the HBCDEM Plan

 

­ Complete framework for Training Needs Analysis and Training Programme with partner organisations

­ Complete HBCDEM Group Training Directive

 

­ Maintain three yearly exercise programmes

­ Corrective Actions that the HBCDEM group has responsibility for are implemented in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan

Achieved

The review of the Group Plan was approved by the CDEM Joint Committee on 20 June 2014.

Not Achieved

Framework for Training Needs Analysis will be dealt with as part of the implementation Group Plan

Partially Achieved

The training directive will be completed post the Group Plan review late 2014

The corrective actions plan from the recommendations of the Capability Assessment Report is being reviewed quarterly by the Coordinating Executives Group and was considered as part of the review of the Group Plan.

The level of support provided to the HBCDEM Group in directing and co-ordinating personnel and resources for response and recovery operations.

2013-14

­ Completed welfare work plan

­ Conduct induction training for incoming Joint Committee members post 2013 elections

2012-22

­ An active Welfare Advisory Group which meets at least 4 times a year

Partially Achieved

The review of the Group Welfare Plan will be conducted post the Group Plan review.

 

 

Achieved

The Welfare Advisory Group is meeting at least quarterly and is making good progress in coordinating welfare planning and cooperation between different welfare agencies.

The percentage of surveyed residents prepared to cope for at least three days on their own.

2012-22

­ 90% residents have enough food stored for three days and had some way of cooking without electricity

­ 75% have enough water stored

­ As measured by three yearly survey

Achieved

Survey results in 2013 (HBRC survey undertaken by SIL Research) showed 93% had enough food stored, with 89% having some alternative way of cooking without electricity.

68% had enough water stored not including water in the hot water cylinders.  An increase from 55% in 2011.

A National MCDEM survey in July 2011 showed 66% of NZers had taken steps to prepare themselves or their household, up from 44% the previous year.

HBRC will ensure that appropriate levels of response capabilities are in place and maintained across the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (HBCDEM) Group.

Established Emergency Management Plans including training and procedures.

 

2013-14

­ Continue to develop the capability of the Group Emergency Coordination Centre in Hastings.

­ Complete capacity review of existing Emergency Operations Centre facilities in HBCDEM Group.

2012-22

­ Maintain Plans and Standard Operating Procedures and ensure Group Emergency Coordination Centres can be ready for operation within 6 hrs of event.

­ Effectively and efficiently manage any emergency events from initial warning until a safe situation returns.

Achieved

The GECC is equipped fully and operational.

Minor enhancements identified during training and testing are being implemented.

 

 

 

Partially Achieved

Reviews will occur in parallel with the implementation of the national Emergency Management Information System (EMIS).Volcanic Ash Exercise held in November 2013.

Warning system established and operating.  165 warnings or watches of severe weather, volcanic alert level changes, tsunami advice or other hazardous events have been effectively and efficiently managed.  Wide level of satisfaction by supporting agencies in the system.

Maintain the CDEM Group’s emergency management and civil defence capacity with the capability of effectively responding to an emergency event.

2012-22

­ Maintain established teams, training programmes, Emergency Operations Centre, Manuals, in accordance with HBCDEM Group Plan.

Achieved

Contact List of trained team members is maintained.

Development of Training activities incorporating the new EMIS operating platform was completed across the Group over 203/14. There have been technical issues with EMIS nationally and the Group is slowly making this system operational as these issues are sorted out by MCDEM.

 HBRC will ensure the recovery from emergencies is managed in accordance with the scale of the event.

Facilitate and maintain Lifelines Group who have effective input into Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group plans.

 

Dedicated CDEM Group Recovery Manager appointed.

 

A relevant CDEM Group Recovery Plan is adopted and maintained.

2013-14

­ An active Lifelines Group which meets at least 4 times a year.

­ Complete Group Recovery Plan.

­ Complete an engineering Lifelines work programme.

2012 – 2022

­ Partner Territorial Authorities have appointed local recovery managers.

Partially Achieved

The HB Engineering Lifelines Group has appointed a new Chairman.  The Lifelines Group represents essential utilities and infrastructure.  There is a requirement under legislation that they need to be up and running as quickly as possible after an event.  The group has commenced a critical sites assessment project which should be compete in August 2014.

Partially Achieved

Hawke’s Bay Recovery Forum was run in December 2013.  This forum facilitated the development of a Hawke’s Bay Recovery Strategy.  This strategy was approved by the CDEM Joint Committee in June 2014.  The Strategy now needs to be rolled out to the TLAs and the appointment of local recovery mangers will be part of this process.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The $189k variance from budget in this activity was due to reduced activity levels during the review of the Group Plan and the holding of a vacancy while this was being completed.  With this Plan now being complete and strategic objectives set, this overspend will be used to implement change in the Hawke’s Bay CDEM Group resourcing and structure in 2014-15.

 


Activity 2 – Hazard Assessment & Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Response

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Hazard Assessment & Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Response

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will ensure it has an emergency response capability that can provide regional hazard assessments and warning systems to the Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group and to manage Council assets.

Effectiveness of response capacity and capability.

Ongoing

­ Maintain established Teams, training programmes, Emergency Operations Centre, Manuals and Business Continuance Plan.

Achieved

-    CDEM teams maintained, with 21 new staff inducted in the Council’s emergency requirements. Training sessions have been run for all HBRC CDEM Teams with EOC’s and manuals maintained.

-    Biennial review of the BCP was completed and approved by the Executive Team in September 2013.

24hour duty management system is in place.

Ongoing

­ Operate an effective 24-hour Duty Management Service and respond to urgent public enquiries and complaints in a timely professional manner.

Achieved

An effective 24-hour duty management system has been operated with 545 calls logged for the year.

HBRC provide reliable warning of flooding from the region’s major rivers to at risk communities in the Wairoa, Tutaekuri, Ngaruroro and Tukituki areas.

Percentage of time that priority telemetered rainfall and river level sites are operational throughout the year.

­ Priority sites: 98%

­ Overall: 92%

Percentage of time that priority telemetered rainfall and river level sites are operational throughout the year:

2012-19:  98% average for all key sites

Achieved

Key sites = 99.74% performance

All Sites = 98.32 % performance

(July 2013 to Feb. 2014)

A flood forecasting system is available on the web to advise the community on likely rainfall and flooding.

Percentage of the region at risk of flooding from large rivers, covered by a flood forecasting model.

Percentage  of the region covered by a flood forecasting model

2014-15:  70%

 

Achieved

­ The Ngaruroro, Tukituki and Tutaekuri rivers make up the central and southern flood forecasting model. In the North the Wairoa River catchment is covered by a flood forecast model. To date 70% of the region is covered with a model.

Ongoing

­ No decrease in model performance.

Achieved

Verification work is carried out following a flood event to improve the models.

Information available on HBRC’s website during storm events.

 

Ongoing

­ No change

Achieved

­ Currently information on the Council web is available only for larger flood events.

Peak flood forecast river flows agree within 25% of the actual flows.

Ongoing

­ No decrease in performance.

Achieved

Provided flooding potential advice to the region, no significant events occurred during the period.

HBRC will continue to improve its knowledge and understanding of flood risks from the areas exposed to severe weather events and the effects of runoff onto low lying land and into the network of drains, streams and rivers of the region.

 

Percentage of area mapped for flood hazard, including the impact of climate change.

2014-15:  100%

­ To update flood hazard information for high risk communities.

 

Almost Achieved

97% of the high risk communities have been mapped (excluding climate change effects).

 

29% of the low risk communities have been mapped (excluding climate change effects).

 

HBRC will to respond to oil spills within the Hawke’s Bay Coastal Marine boundary and maintain a Tier 2 oil spill response plan which identifies priority areas in HB for protection in the event of a major spill.

Current Tier 2 Oil Spill Plan is in place and training is being implemented

Operative Marine Oil Spill Plan is maintained, along with trained personnel.

Achieved

­ A 3-yearly plan review has been completed as required by MNZ, with an environmental risk assessment workshop held in October.  Public consultation resulted in 5 submissions, and the plan was submitted to MNZ in June 2014 for approval.

­ 10 staff attended various MNZ training courses, and 2 practical exercises were run.

­ 3 oil spill events have occurred with appropriate responses made and clean up arranged. Costs fully recovered with minimal environmental impacts.

 


Financial Variances Explained

While there was approximately $120,000 of under expenditure on the flood risk assessment project this was offset by $60,000 excedence in the flood forecasting in hydrology flow management project. During the year staff focused on improved flood forecasting and modelling work to detriment of progressing flood risk assessment. A shortage of staff resource due to an engineering position remaining unfilled during the year resulted in an overall under expenditure in this area.

 

­       


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Transport

Transport covers regional transport planning, provision of passenger transport and co-ordination and provision of road safety initiatives across Hawke’s Bay.

The driving force is the Regional Land Transport Strategy and the Regional Land Transport Programme, which were required to be prepared by the Regional Transport Committee.

The Land Transport Management Act 2003 requires Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) to consider the transport needs of disadvantaged people. In September 2011, HBRC adopted a Regional Public Transport Plan to address this and guide it in providing a passenger transport system that contributes to the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of the people of the region.

HBRC also operates a Total Mobility Scheme that provides a subsidised taxi service for people with serious mobility constraints by way of taxi vouchers.

HBRC contracts Go Bus Ltd to conduct the urban bus services for Hastings and Napier.  They receive all fare income and this is deducted from the contract fees that HBRC pay to Go Bus Ltd.  This contract forms part of the operating expenditure for Subsidised Passenger Transport.


 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Regional Road Safety

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– Regional Road Safety

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will engage, co-ordinate and implement sustainable regional road safety initiatives so that Hawke’s Bay roads and pathways are safe and accessible, and that the emotional and financial costs of road traffic crashes are reduced

 

Effectively implement Regional Safety Action Plans with the relevant objectives of the Regional Land Transport Strategy; Safer Journeys 2020; and the New Zealand Injury Prevention Strategy

 

2013-22

­ Regional Safety Action Plans for Wairoa, Napier, Hastings, and Central Hawke’s Bay will be reviewed quarterly with a focus on key issues to be addressed

 

 

­ Road safety programmes are implemented to reduce the incidence and severity of road traffic crashes and to align with the key outcomes and issues in the RoadSafe Strategic Plan

Achieved

Quarterly Regional Safety Action Plan meetings have been held, with the latest taking place in June.  These meetings continue to be purposeful for the stakeholders and provide an opportunity to identify joint projects.

Achieved

Programmes have been undertaken as per the RoadSafe Strategic Plan.  The plan focuses on the region’s high risk categories. Quarterly reports have been completed for the Regional Transport Committee.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The budget for this activity was exceeded with a cost to HBRC of $44,000 against a budget of $20,500 (after reforecasting).  This was mainly due to higher than budgeted staff costs.

 


Activity 2 – Regional Land Transport Strategy

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Regional Land Transport Strategy

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

Through the region’s transport strategy HBRC will promote improved integration of all transport modes, land use and efficient movement of freight

Approved Regional Land Transport Strategy in place

2013-14

­ Implement and report on current RLTS as required by statute

2015

­ Review of RLTS completed by July 2015

Achieved

The Regional Land Transport Strategy for 2012-2042 (RLTS) was adopted in June 2012.

Achieved

The RLTS has been monitored by the Transport Advisory Group and reports have been provided to the Regional Transport Committee as required.

Three yearly Regional Land Transport Programme approved

2013-15

­ Implement and report on Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-15 as required by statute

 

Achieved

The Regional Land Transport Programme is monitored by the Transport Advisory Group and regular reports are provided to the Regional Transport Committee. Good progress has been made with the implementation of high priority projects during 2013-14.

 

Financial Variances Explained

This budget was under spent, with 73% of the budget used. This was due to low staff costs and less consultancy cost than budgeted.

 


Activity 3 – Subsidised Passenger Transport

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3– Subsidised Passenger Transport

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will provide an accessible bus service and appropriate service infrastructure within and between the Napier, Hastings and Havelock North urban areas that will be expanded to meet the increasing need for public transport for the people of Hawke’s Bay

In accordance with Regional Land Transport Strategy

2013-15

­ Build on the improvements made over the last 3 years and ensure current levels of services are maintained and target any increase in funding towards improving existing services

Achieved

Improvements made over the last 3-4 years have resulted in increased (and still rising) passenger trips.  There was a 5% increase in patronage during 2013-14, when compared with the previous year.

Additional buses have been added to Route 12 to address overloading issues at peak times, with costs offset by a reduction of the express Hastings to Napier service which was under patronised.

Continue improving signage, infrastructure and information at all bus stops

2013-14

­ Implement bus-stop service level standards (as outlined in Regional Public Transport Plan)

 

 

 

2013-15

­ Install four additional bus shelters each year (two in Hastings and two in Napier)

Partially Achieved

In consultation with Hastings District Council bus stop signage has been installed throughout Hastings. Discussions are continuing regarding the installation of similar signage at bus stops in Napier.

Achieved

Two shelters have been installed in Napier and two have been installed in Hastings.

Where bus routes exist, at least 90% of residences and businesses are in the following walking distances of a bus stop:

­ 500m:   normal conditions

­ 600m:   low density/outer areas

2013-15

­ Increase the number of bus stops in Hastings and Napier to meet the measure in the Regional Public Transport Plan

Not Achieved

No new bus stops have been installed during this period.  The Regional Public Transport Plan is to be reviewed during 2014-15 and bus routes are under review.  Bus stop installation may continue after this review.

Changes in technology to be utilised to provide a better service

2013-14

­ Investigate online top-ups for smartcards

Achieved

HBRC is part of a national electronic bus ticketing project to develop a replacement system for regional councils. It is expected that online top-ups will be a feature of this system.

Fare payment systems are to be simple to understand; reviewed regularly and accurately record passenger trip information

 

Fare levels will be reviewed annually

2013-19

­ Fare reviews to be undertaken annually

Achieved

Fares were increased in September 2013 and the final stage of a three year fare increase programme will be implemented in September 2014.

Integration with other modes

Improve integration between public transport and walking and cycling

2013-15

­ Investigate further opportunities for installation of secure bike racks at major bus stops

Not Achieved

No further bike racks have been installed at bus stops, as suitable sites have not been identified.  Bike racks on buses continue to be well-used, with over 5647 bikes carried since the carriers were first installed.

Continue to provide and deliver the Total Mobility scheme in Napier, Hastings and Waipukurau for those unable to use public transport due to serious mobility constraints

 

Membership is increased and service delivered in accordance with New Zealand Transport Authority guidelines

2013-15

­ Increase by at least 5% a year

Achieved

Total membership recorded on the Council’s Total Mobility database continues to increase.

Membership at June 2014 was 3261, an increase of 6.4% on June 2013 membership.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The budget for this activity was exceeded by $125,000 as revenue from New Zealand Transport Agency subsidies was less than budgeted and cost indexation on the bus contract was higher than predicted.

­       


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Governance and Community Engagement

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) Governance and Community Engagement role and responsibilities involve decision-making, keeping regional residents informed, and ensuring that Hawke’s Bay people have a meaningful say on the direction of their region.

This group covers the following activities to deliver these roles and responsibilities.

Strategic Alliances - involves HBRC working with a range of organisations - central government, university, private sector groups and councils - to provide valued services and research that is targeted and efficient.

Community Engagement and Communication - encompasses all HBRC purposes and functions and engagement with a broad range of stakeholders in the general community through a variety of media.

Response to Climate Change – outlines some of the measures that HBRC either has in place or proposes to introduce to contribute to lowering carbon emissions in Hawke’s Bay.

Community Representation and Regional Leadership includes Council elections and the role of Councillors in representing their constituent community, plus providing opportunities for individuals and groups to influence decision-making.

Investment Company Support involves the management and administration support provided to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Ltd.

 



HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Activity 1 – Community Partnerships

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– Community Partnerships

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will engage in strategic relationships that help better achieve its vision and purposes.

Formalisation of strategic alliances that are sector and institutionally-based.

2012-15

­ Create a bi-annual forum of primary production sector associations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

­ Determine shared services opportunities with Hawke’s Bay councils and wider regional sector allies

 

Achieved

The Pan-Sector Group has been formed through the Land Management Team, comprising agencies across the primary production sector. The aim of the Pan-sector Group is to collaboratively develop and coordinate a industry based strategic approach to sustainable land management that aims to increase the economic benefit from primary industry throughout Hawke’s Bay while considering processes to manage and mitigate the effects of current and potential land uses on water quality in the region. The Group’s immediate focus is on realizing the economic, environmental and social benefits from the Ruataniwha Water Storage Project.

The Group meets 3-4 times per year.

Achieved

A Shared Services Company (HBLASS Ltd) was incorporated in December 2012. Membership of the Board comprises the CEOs of the 5 local authorities and an independent Chairman. The Statement of Intent for 2014/15 was adopted by HBRC in February 2014.

Several work streams have been progressed, principally vehicle fleet management and the establishment of a GIS Shared Service

 

HBRC will work in partnership with treaty claimant groups to govern natural resources and to jointly explore sustainable economic opportunities in Hawke’s Bay.

Regional Planning Committee operating successfully.

2012-15

­ Regional Planning Committee permanently established.

Partially Achieved

The Hawke’s Bay Regional Planning Committee Bill, to which HBRC is a party, was introduced in to the House on 16 April 2014.

HBRC will contribute to support the development of Regional Public Infrastructure projects.

Evaluation of Regional Public Infrastructure projects and which to support.

2013-14

$2M provision is made for regional hockey turf facilities in Hawke’s Bay, requiring that the HB Hockey Association, the Hawke’s Bay Hockey Artificial Surfaces Trust, the Regional Sports Park Trust and the Napier City and Hastings District councils, produce an acceptable and agreed Plan for any new Regional hockey turf facilities that complies with Council’s Regional Community Facilities fund policy.

Achieved

Council has paid $2M to the Regional Sports Park Trust for the construction of a Tier one hockey turf, which has since been completed.

 

 

-   $500,000 for the upgrade of the Wairoa Community Centre/Alexander Park in Wairoa District.

Not Achieved

Wairoa District Council has now completed its fundraising for the Community Centre upgrade and is finalising the design stage of the project. Construction is expected to begin in late 2014 with completion by mid-2015.

 

 

$500,000 for the provision of a Visitor and Education Centre at Te Mata Peak in Hastings District, subject to negotiations with the Te Mata Park Trust and the Hastings District Council to ensure the best possible alignment with HBRC’s policy for Community Facilities and brand recognition.

Not Achieved

The Te Mata Park Trust Board advises that in August 2014 they are commencing fundraising for the final money (approx $1M, with $3.3M already secured) and are targeting a build commencement in mid-2015.

 

 

Financial Variances Explained

A sum of $3m was provided in the budget for targeted assistance to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Sports Park facility, Wairoa Community Centre and Te Mata Park Trust.  This targeted assistance was budgeted to be met by loan funding ($2.1m) and Council reserves ($0.9m).

During the year $2m was paid to the Regional Sports Park for the regional hockey turf, and this was funded from loans ($1.1m) and Council reserves ($0.9m).

The $1m targeted assistance and associated loan funding for Wairoa and Te Mata Park has been carried forward by Council to the 2014-15 financial year.

 


Activity 2 – Community Engagement & Communications

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Community Engagement & Communications

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will communicate its purpose and direction to the community. The community will know what it is being done and why.

On-time delivery of Annual Plan, plan change, State of the Environment and statutory documents.

2013-15

­ Long Term Plan, State of the Environment, Annual Report, Tukituki Plan change.

Achieved

Delivered 2012-13 Annual Report, Summary Annual Report and 2013-14 Draft Annual Plan, Summary Draft Plan and Annual Plan.

Councillors, Executive and staff available to speak/inform on HBRC activities.

2013-15

­ Measure number of interactions.

Achieved

Engaged through HB Home & Garden Show, HB 150th A&P Show (Ruataniwha storage and bio-security/ diversity expo stands), Chamber Business Awards, Ballance Farm Environment Awards, Irrigation NZ Conference, Better Home and Living Show, National Horticultural Field Day, Walk and Talk Series, planting days, educational workshops and HB Trails events

Number of media releases generated; uptake of digital technologies.

2013-15

­ 90 Releases; Number of social media posts.

Achieved

127 media releases of which 105 were covered by media, 153 Facebook posts and 26 tweets in period

Regional newsprint media coverage averages > 90% positive/neutral.

2013-15

­ Not less than 95% average

Achieved

Media coverage at 96.3% positive/ neutral

HBRC will provide opportunities for the community to be involved in its decision making processes. Community engagement will be a key component of all major programmes and projects.

Number of council meetings and workshops.

2013-15

­ Open reporting of Council/ Committee items.

Achieved

44 Council and Committee meetings held in reporting period, of these eleven (11) had a public-excluded element

Clearly flagged opportunities for input, submissions and other feedback into HBRC documents.

2013-15

­ Refresh and maintain annual HBRC Communications Plan

Achieved

Continuous improvement through communications strategy and targeted communication plans

Number of public meetings, workshops and public events (includes awards and field days).

2013-15

­ Meetings, workshops and events strongly considered for major projects and in HBRC’s statutory role

Achieved

In addition to the interactions outlined above a special consultative process was undertaken for investment in the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme. 17 public meetings were held as part of this process and approximately 500 people attended.

Four annual plan public meetings were held and the total attendance was between 20 and 30.

Regular meetings held for TANK Group, HB Biodiversity Strategy and Pan-Sector Group.

Twenty meetings specific to potential water users (Ruataniwha storage)

HBRC will provide information that is relevant to the community and communities of interest. Information will be audience appropriate.

Delivery of updates on HBRC activities and progress.

2013-15

­ Generate region, community and consent holder/ catchment newsletters

Achieved

Targeted newsletters: Our Place (x3), Rates Update, RWSS consultation flyer; In the Zone newsletters, leaders Briefing, Step Out (schools) and newsletters to leaseholders.

Facilitation of agreed stakeholder groups.

2013-15

­ Audit number of groups

Achieved

93 active partnerships as of March 2014

Timely delivery information to communities of interest.

2013-15

­ Appropriate ‘tool’ selected according to programme needs

Achieved

Council uses a range of channels to suit programmes and activities, including websites, publications, newspapers, radio, social media posts, brochures and events

 

Financial Variances Explained

The overall project proceeded in accordance with the programme, with budget variance due to additional Ruataniwha Water Storage requirements with external contributors.


Activity 3 – Response to Climate Change

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3– Response to Climate Change

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will increase the community’s resilience to climate change

HBRC’s corporate total annual Greenhouse Gas emissions measure in carbon dioxide equivalents (excluding Port of Napier Ltd)

2012-22

­ Reduce corporate (excluding Port of Napier Ltd) carbon emissions from 2005/06 by:

·      10% by 2014

·      20% by 2020

·      30% by 2050

Monitoring of carbon emissions is being undertaken and strategies for reducing those emissions implemented.

Staff preparing report to Council late in 2014.

Number of sectors through which HBRC promotes / influences reduction in carbon emissions and adaptation to climate change

2013

­ Establish a process to monitor and report regional carbon emissions with the first report completed by 30 June 2013

 

 

­ Funding for conversion of 100 dwellings to solar hot water.

 

 

 

2013-19

­ Continue to increase HBRC’s influence in initiatives to improve regional resilience to the impacts of climate change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

­ Continue to update and report regional carbon emissions at least every 3 years.

Achieved

A system to quantify regional green house emissions has been developed by Landcare Research.  This requires substantial data gathering.  Staff preparing report to Council late in 2014.

Not Achieved

HBRC has yet to receive a business case for the establishment for a Solar Hot Water Scheme from Napier City and Hastings District councils. Provision is still available for loan funding should the scheme be initiated.

Achieved

A number of initiatives included in HBRC Strategic document and LTP are being implemented.

A report entitled Global Climate Change and Barrier-beach responses has been completed and published.  This predicts a significant increase in risk along the regions coast by 2100.  HBRC have initiated the development in conjunction with territorial authorities of a coastal strategy to determine appropriate mitigation of the impact of this hazard.

Not Achieved.

­ Gathering of information for this report has commenced. Report completion programmed for presentation to Council during 2014/15.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.


Activity 4 – Community Representation & Regional Leadership

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4– Community Representation & Regional Leadership

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will provide the community with a channel for representation through elected members and Iwi to enable access and influence on decision making.

Councillors’ attendance at monthly Council and Committee meetings achieving at least 90% attendance of elected and appointed members.

2012-22

­ Attendance rate of 90%.

Achieved

40 Council and Committee meetings were held, with attendance rate of 91%.

Attendance at Maori Committee meetings.

2012-22

­ Attendance rate of 80%

Achieved

The Maori Committee held 5 meetings during the year, with an attendance rate of 84%.

10 Year Plan/Annual Plan consultation during April and May with the final Plan being adopted by HBRC by 30 June.

2012-22

­ Consultation and submission period of at least 25 working days.

Achieved

Draft Annual Plan 2014-15 publicly notified 2 April 2014 with submissions closing date 12 May 2014, providing 25 working days.

Comply with the provisions of the Local Electoral Act 2001.

2013-14

­ Elections to be held 12 October 2013.

Achieved

Elections held and final results confirmed Wednesday, 16 October 2013.

HBRC will aim to maximise Local Government effectiveness and efficiency.

Facilitate and report on Local Government efficiencies achieved.

2012-22

Complete a review, in consultation with territorial authorities within the region, which will cover:

­ Opportunities for inter-regional and central government collaboration.

­ How the Hawke’s Bay economy might be further diversified and made more resilient.

­ The role of Local Government in Hawke’s Bay in enabling socioeconomic development, and the effectiveness of Local Government structures including planning and compliance frameworks are to be studied.

Achieved

The Study on Improving the Social and Economic Performance of Hawke’s Bay was initiated in April 2012 with the appointment of McGredy Winder & Co.

The Terms of Reference called for two phases of work. The first phase was completed in August 2012.

Phase 2, which assessed the costs and benefits of three alternative local government structures, was completed in June 2013. It provides a financial model that can be applied to other local government options within Hawke’s Bay.

A Shared Services Company (HBLASS Ltd) was incorporated in December 2012. Membership of the Board comprises the CEOs of the 5 local authorities and an independent Chairman. The Statement of Intent for 2014-15 was considered by Council in February 2014 and no amendments were sought by Council.

Several work streams have been progressed, principally vehicle fleet management and the appointment of a Regional GIS Manager.

 

Financial Variances Explained

There were no significant variances from budget are in this activity.

 


Activity 5 – Investment Company Support

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 5– Investment Company Support

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

2013-14 Performance Targets

2013-14 Year End Results

HBRC will provide support services to the Investment Company and to any associated subsidiaries of the Investment Company.

A number of Board meetings to be supported by HBRC staff.

2012-22

­ Provide support for the Board meetings of the Investment Company and subsidiaries.

­ Confirm the Statement of Corporate Intent each year.

Achieved

Administrative and finance support provided as agreed.

Final Statement of Corporate Intent 2014-15 approved by Council on 28 May 2014.

 

Financial Variances Explained

The actual costs incurred for this project were $177,000 as compared to the budget of $74,000.  All costs were recovered from the Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Ltd.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Financial Statements

 

Comprehensive Income Statement

For the year ended 30 June 2014

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

Statement of Changes in Equity

For the year ended 30 June 2014

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Balance Sheet

For the year ended 30 June 2014

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Statement of Cash Flows

For the year ended 30 June 2014

The accompanying notes form part of these financial statements.


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Notes to the Financial Statements

Note 1:  General Information

­      1.1     Reporting Entity

The Hawke's Bay Regional Council (Council) is a regional local authority governed by the Local Government Act 2002 and is domiciled in New Zealand.

The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council group (group) consists of the parent, the Council, and its subsidiaries, The Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Limited (HBRIC) and the Port of Napier Limited (Port).  HBRIC is a 100% owned subsidiary of Council and the Port is a 100% subsidiary of HBRIC.  Both companies are incorporated and domiciled in New Zealand.

The primary objective of Council is to provide services for the community and social benefit rather than making a financial return.  Accordingly, The Council has designated itself and the group as public benefit entities for the purposes of New Zealand equivalents to International Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS).

The financial statements of the Council and group are for the year ended 30 June 2014 and were authorised for issue on 24 September 2014 by the Council. 

­      1.2     Basis of Preparation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002, which includes the requirement to comply with New Zealand generally accepted accounting practice (NZ GAAP).

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with NZ GAAP as appropriate for public benefit entities adopting NZ IFRS and other applicable New Zealand Financial Reporting Standards.

The statements have been prepared under the historic cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of land and buildings, infrastructure assets, hydrological equipment, investment property, forestry assets and financial instruments.


The group’s functional currency is New Zealand dollars and the statements have been presented in thousands of dollars ($’000) exclusive of New Zealand Goods and Services Tax (GST) except for trade accounts payable and receivable, which are stated at GST inclusive amounts.

Note 2:  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these financial statements are set out below.  These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

­      2.1     Consolidation

The Port has a financial year ending on 30 September.  In order to consolidate the subsidiary, a reporting package with a financial year ending on 31 March is produced so as to avoid peak seasonal work periods.   The subsidiary is accounted for using the purchase method, which involves adding together corresponding assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses on a line-by-line basis.  All significant inter-entity transactions are eliminated and significant transactions occurring during the period 1 April to 30 June are adjusted for. 

­      2.2     Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (using the weighted average cost method) and net realisable value.

­      2.3     Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently re-measured each balance sheet date at amortised cost using the effective interest method less provision for impairment.

­      2.4     Plant, Property and Equipment

(2.4.1) Operational Assets

Council land and buildings are shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by independent, professionally qualified valuers.

Hydrological equipment is shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by suitably experienced Council employees, on the basis of depreciated replacement cost.  Independent, professionally qualified valuers review all such valuations.

All other operational assets (including Port assets for consolidated financial statements) are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation.  Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.

The costs of asset constructed by the group include the cost of all materials used in construction, direct labour on the project and an appropriate amount of directly attributed costs.  Costs cease to be capitalised as soon as the asset is ready for productive use.

(2.4.2) Infrastructure Assets

Infrastructure assets are tangible assets that are necessary to fulfil the Council’s obligations in respect of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 and the Drainage Act 1908.  Such assets usually show some or all of the following characteristics:

·    They are part of a system or network that could not provide the required level of service if one component was removed.

·    They enable the Council to fulfil its obligations to the region’s communities in respect of flood control and drainage legislation.

·    They are specialised in nature and do not have alternative uses.

·    They are subject to constraints on removal.

Infrastructure assets are shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by suitably experienced Council employees, on the basis of depreciated replacement cost.  Independent, professionally qualified valuers review all such valuations.

(2.4.3) Subsequent Costs

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Council or group and the cost can be measured reliably.  All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the comprehensive income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.

(2.4.4) Revaluation Adjustments

Increases in carrying amounts arising from revalued assets are credited to revaluation reserves in equity.  Decreases that offset previous increases of the same asset category are charged against revaluation reserves in equity.  All other decreases are charged to the comprehensive income statement.

Any accumulated depreciation at the date of revaluation is eliminated against the gross carrying amount of the asset and the net amount is restated to the revalued amount of the asset.

(2.4.5) Other Adjustments

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount.  These are included in the comprehensive income statement.  When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in revaluation reserves are transferred to the accumulated balance in equity.

­      2.5     Investment Property

Investment property is residential and commercial land and buildings held to earn rental income and for capital appreciation.  Such property is initially recognised at cost.  At each balance sheet date investment property is measured at fair value, representing open market value determined annually by independent, professionally qualified valuers.  A gain or loss in value is recorded in the comprehensive income statement for the period in which it arises.

Under the Hawke’s Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002, rental income from endowment land in Hawke’s Bay can only be used for the improvement, protection, management or use of Napier Harbour or the Regional Council’s coastal marine area as defined in section 2 (1) of the Resource Management Act 1991.  Unspent funds are held in the Coastal Marine Area Reserve Fund.

 


­      2.6     Forestry Crops

Forestry crops are measured at their fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs each balance sheet date by independent, professionally qualified valuers.  Fair value is determined by the present value of expected net cash flows discounted by the current market-determined pre-tax rate.  A gain or loss in value is recorded in the comprehensive income statement for the period in which it arises.

­      2.7     Financial Assets

Financial assets are designated at initial recognition into one of the four following categories set out below depending on the purpose for which the financial asset was acquired.  At each balance sheet date, all financial asset designations are re-evaluated.

(2.7.1) Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

Financial assets are classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term or are so designated by management.  The category includes derivatives and has two sub-categories: financial assets held for trading, and those designated at fair value through the profit and loss at inception.  Assets held in this category are classified as current assets if they are either held for trading, or are expected to be realised within 12 months of balance sheet date.

Financial assets in this category, including derivatives, are initially recognised at fair value and are measured at each balance sheet date at fair value.  Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the comprehensive income statement for the period in which they arise.

(2.7.2) Loans and Receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market.  They are included in non-current assets except when maturities are shorter than 12 months from balance sheet date.


Financial assets in this category are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or use.  At each balance sheet date these financial assets are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.  Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the comprehensive income statement for the period in which they arise.

(2.7.3) Held-to-Maturity Investments

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that management have a positive intention and ability to hold to maturity.

Financial assets in this category are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or use.  At each balance sheet date these financial assets are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.  Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the comprehensive income statement for the period in which they arise.

(2.7.4) Available-for-Sale Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated in this category or are not classified in any of the other categories.  They are included in non-current assets unless there is an intention to dispose of the investment within 12 months of balance sheet date.

Available-for-sale financial assets are carried at fair value using a quoted price if an active market exists or using discounted valuation techniques if no active market exists.  Any gain or loss in value is recognised directly in equity through the statement of changes in equity for the period in which it arises. 

When an available-for-sale financial asset is sold, the accumulated fair value adjustments are included in the comprehensive income statement.

At each balance sheet date, an assessment is made whether there is any objective evidence that a financial assets or group of financial assets is impaired.  If objective evidence of impairment exists for available-for-sale financial assets, then any cumulative loss is transferred from equity to the comprehensive income statement.  Such a transfer is not reversible.

­      2.8     Intangible Assets

Intangible assets comprise acquired computer software licences and development expenditure.  All intangible assets with finite lives are carried at the historical cost incurred to acquire and bring into use the specific software less accumulated amortisation.

­      2.9     Impairment of Non-Financial Assets

Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested for impairment at each balance sheet date.  Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.  An impairment loss is recognised in the comprehensive income statement for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount.  The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use.  For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows.

­      2.10   Depreciation and Amortisation

Land, reserves and hard dredging are not depreciated.  Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts to their residual values over their estimated useful lives.  Assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.  Major depreciation and amortisation periods are as follows.

Asset Category

Years

Buildings

10 - 100

Site Improvements

10 - 40

Wharves & Jetties

10 - 80

Vehicles

3 - 10

Plant & Equipment

3 - 25

Computer Equipment

3 - 5

Computer Software & Licences

3 - 10

Infrastructure Assets

10 - 70

Soft Dredging

6 - 8

 

No depreciation is provided for stop banks, berm edge protection, sea or river groynes, drainage works, sawfly protection, or unsealed roads.  These assets are not considered to deteriorate over time and, therefore, will provide a constant level of service unless subjected to a significant flood event.

­      2.11   Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts.  Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet.

­      2.12   Borrowings

Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred.  Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost.  Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the comprehensive income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method.

Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.

Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense when incurred except to the extent that they are capitalised.  Borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of an asset are capitalised as a part of the cost of that asset.


­      2.13   Income Tax

Income tax expense charged to the comprehensive income statement includes both current and deferred tax and is calculated after allowing for non-assessable income and non-deductible costs.

Deferred income tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method, providing for temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.  Temporary differences are not provided for where the initial recognition of assets and liabilities does not affect either accounting or taxable profit.  The amount of deferred tax provided is based on tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and are expected to apply when the related deferred tax liability is settled.

A deferred tax asset is recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which the asset can be utilised.  Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.

­      2.14   Employee Benefits

Short-term employee benefits including salaries and wages, annual leave and contributions to superannuation schemes are recognised when they accrue to employees and are measured at undiscounted cost.

The liability for accumulating sick leave is stated as the cost of sick leave that is expected to be used.

Long-term employee benefits including long service leave and retirement gratuities are recognised at the present value of the Group’s obligation at balance sheet date.


­      2.15   Provisions

Provisions are recognised when:

·    the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, and

·    it is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and

·    the amount has been reliably estimated.

Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a pre-tax rate that reflects the current market assessments of the time value of money and risks specific to the obligation.  The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognised as interest expense

Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

­      2.16   Revenue Recognition

Revenue comprises the fair value for the sale of goods and services, net of GST, rebates and discounts and after elimination of sales within the Group.  Revenue is recognised as follows:

·   Sales of goods are recognised when a product is sold to a customer.  The recorded revenue is the gross amount of the sales.

·   Sales of services are recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered, by reference to the completion of the specific transaction assessed on the basis of the actual service provided as a proportion of the total service provided.

·   Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method.

·   Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.

·   Government grants are recognised as income when eligibility has been established by the grantor agency.

·   Rates are recognised as income in the accounting period in which they are set and assessed.

­      2.17   Leases

Finance leases, which transfer to the Group substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the leased item, are capitalised at the inception of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments.

Lease payments are apportioned between the finance charges and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.  Finance charges are included in the comprehensive income statement as finance costs.

Capitalised leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset and the lease term.

Leases in which a significant proportion of the risks and benefits of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases.  Payments made under operating leases are charged to the comprehensive income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

­      2.18   Financial Risk Management

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks including:

·    Market risk, including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk and price risk;

·    Credit risk;

·    Liquidity risk; and

·    Cash flow interest-rate risk.

The Group’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance.  The Group uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge certain exposures.

The Group enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions, when purchasing major property, plant and equipment and when payment is denominated in foreign currency.

Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk exposure.

The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risk.  It has policies in place to ensure that services are provided to customers with an appropriate credit history.

Collateral or other security in not required for financial instruments subject to credit risk.

­      2.19   Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at the fair value at each balance sheet date.

Where the Group determines that it will hedge a transaction the Group documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.

The Group also documents its assessment, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values of hedged items.

(2.19.1) Cash Flow Hedge

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognised in equity.  The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the comprehensive income statement.  The Group accounts for hedges of foreign currency risk of a firm commitment as cash flow hedges.

(2.19.2) Derivatives that Do Not Qualify for Hedge Accounting

Certain derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognised immediately in the comprehensive income statement.

Any changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps due to changes in interest rates are recognised in the comprehensive income statement in the period in which they occur.

 

­      2.20   Foreign Currencies

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the New Zealand rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction.  At balance sheet date foreign monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate and exchange variations arising from these are included in the comprehensive income statement.

­      2.21   Basis of Allocation of Council’s Indirect Costs

Clearly identifiable costs are directly charged against each activity.  Indirect costs are allocated to cost centres in the first instance under a variety of methods including:

·   Floor area occupied

·   Number of full time equivalent employees

·   Assessed use of various services provided.

These costs are then charged to projects on a labour standard costing basis.  The allocation unit is each working hour charged by employees at a pre-determined rate.  Variances arising from this method will be allocated on the same basis as for costs of a fixed nature referred to above.  Project costs are then summarised for each activity and group of activities.

­      2.22   Changes in Accounting Policies

There have been no changes to accounting policies.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 3:  Groups of Activities Revenue & Expenditure

 

 

 

Note 4:  Rates Revenue

Note 4(a)

Under Council's rates remission policy for multiple ownership land, 84 rates remissions were approved, totaling $41,989 (2012-13 99 remissions totaling $40,054).

Rating base information

The number of rating units within the region as at June 2014 are 70,046.

The total capital value of rating units within the region as at 30 June 2014 is $30,588,812,400.

The total land value of the rating units within the region as at 30 June 2014 is $15,547,998,650.

Note 5:  Other Revenue

Note 5(a)

Government grants are received from the New Zealand Transport Agency for bus services and road safety projects, New Zealand Trade and Enterprise for regional development projects, Ministry of Justice and the Ministry for the Environment for Iwi initiatives, and the Ministry of Primary Industries for afforestation, environmental and water initiative projects.  The grants are recognised as revenue upon entitlement, as conditions pertaining to eligible expenditure have been fulfilled.  There are no unfulfilled conditions and other contingencies attached to the grants recognised as other revenue.

Note 5(b)

Under the Hawke's Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002, income from leasehold endowment land can only be used for the improvement, protection, management or use of Napier Harbour or the Regional Council's coastal marine area as defined in section 2(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991. Unspent income is held in the Coastal Marine Area Reserve Fund.  The 2013-14 budget assumed that the Wellington leasehold investment property held by the Council would be sold during the 2013-14 financial year.  These sales did not take place due to the cash flows not being required and the solid return from these investments.

Note 5(c)

The 2013-14 budget assumed the sale of Napier leasehold cash flows would take place early in the financial year and interest would be earned of approximately $2.0 million on this lump sum.  This transaction was not completed until December 2013 and so the interest was earned over 6 months and the amount received was $37 million rather than the $51 million estimated in the Annual Plan.

Note 5(d)

There was a loss on disposal on the sale of endowment leasehold property of $4,000 which continue to sell even though Council are no longer offering discounts as an incentive for leaseholders to freehold their properties.  The Council has taken a loss on investment in VHB writing off the debt and investment costs of $292,000.

Note 5(e)

Miscellaneous income includes $193,000 for uncollectable rates provisions which are no longer required and have been released.

Note 6:  Fair Value Gains & Losses through the Income Statement

Note:        Fair value gains and losses on trading assets (listed above) are recorded in the Income Statement.  In addition, when asset revaluation decrements are greater than the corresponding surplus in the Fair Value Reserve, the excess decrements are also recorded in the Income Statement as an asset impairment.

 


Note 7:  Expense Disclosures

Note 7(a)

Key management comprises Councillors and the Chief Executive for Council and Directors and Chief Executive for each subsidiary. (2013-14 actual figures for the Regional Council include both the Chief Executive seconded to HBRIC Ltd and the interim Chief Executive)


Note 8:  Income Tax Expense

 

The Council and Group have unrecognised income tax losses of $5,909 (2012-13 $10,971) with a tax effect of $1,654 (2012-13 $3,072) that are available to carry forward, subject to compliance with the Income Tax Act.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 9:  Property, Plant & Equipment

Note 9(a)

Council land and buildings were valued at 30 June 2013 to fair value on the basis of market value by independent valuer, Telfer Young (Hawke's Bay) Limited. The total fair value of property, plant and equipment valued by Telfer Young (Hawke's Bay) Ltd was $8,255,000.

Land used for forestry in the Lake Tutira Country Park and Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve was valued at 30 June 2013 by Morice Limited, independent valuers.  The total fair value of this land was $808,000.

Land used for carbon sequestration and wastewater disposal was valued at 30 June 2013 by Morice Limited, independent valuers. The total fair value of this land was $1,647,000.

While ownership of the Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve is not vested in the Council, full managerial and financial control was transferred to Council in 1989 under section 16 of the Soil conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941.

Hydrological equipment was valued at 30 June 2013 on the basis of depreciated replacement value. This valuation was carried out by Dr Jack McConchie, an experienced hydrologist with independent consulting engineers Opus International Consultants Limited.

Insurance of Assets

Text Box: HBRC uses an insurance broker who acts on behalf of all five Hawke's Bay Councils to leverage the best competitive prices for insurance.  Although the insurance contracts are separate and not effected by claims from the other four Councils.

* Infrastructure Assets exclude Land

HBRC is a member of the Local Authority Protection Programme (LAPP) which is a collective insurance scheme where local authority members share the cost of insuring infrastructure assets from natural disaster.

Infrastructure assets are insured at modern equivalent value with LAPP.  LAPP then meets 40% of repair costs above an excess of $2,027,000 with the remaining 60% covered by Central Government under the National CDEM Plan.  The excess amount and any costs under the excess amount are self-insured by Disaster Damage Reserves.

Note 9:  Property, Plant & Equipment continued


Note 9(b)

As at 30 September 2012 the Napier Port chose to revalue the sea defences of the Port.  The sea defences are classified as specialised assets and as such were valued on a depreciated replacement cost basis.  The value increased by $72,311,000 and this valuation was undertaken by independent valuer, Rob Kilgour of AECOM as sub consultant to Darroch Ltd.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 10:  Infrastructure Assets (Parent & Group)

 


Note 10(a)

Infrastructure assets were valued by suitably experienced Council employees at 30 June 2014 on the basis of depreciated replacement cost. Significant assumptions used in the methodology include:

-       current prices were used for all input costs such as labour rates, plant hire rates, material costs, and contract works rates,

-       where current prices were not available, the Capital Good Price Index, published by Statistics New Zealand was used,

-       Heretaunga Plains land protected from flooding was valued at $45,000 per hectare,

-       Ruataniwha Plains land protected from flooding was valued at $16,000 per hectare,

-       floodable land  that is grazed was valued at $4,500 per hectare

-       floodable land that is not grazed was valued at nil.

The depreciated replacement cost valuation methodology was reviewed by Gary Williams, an independent registered engineer, while the land values were assessed by G S Morice, a registered valuer with Morice Ltd.

Note 10(b)

The Tutira Reserve Assets were valued at 30 June 2013 by M H Morice, a registered valuer of Morice Ltd, on the basis of fair value.  The total value of assets valued was $676,000.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 11:  Investment Property

Note 11(a)

Wellington leasehold land was valued as portfolio at 30 June 2014 to fair value on the basis of the discounted rental cash flows from the perpetual leasehold properties by Martin J Veale, registered valuer of Telfer Young (Wellington) Ltd.  The discount rate used was between 7.75% and 8.25%.  The total fair value of the twelve properties valued by Martin J Veale as an independent valuer was $11,950,000.

Napier leasehold endowment land was valued as a portfolio at 30 June 2014 to fair value on the basis of the discounted rental cash flows from the perpetual leasehold properties by Trevor W Kitchin, registered valuer of Telfer Young (Hawke's Bay) Ltd.  The discount rate used was 7.75%.  The total fair value of property, valued by Trevor W Kitchin as an independent valuer, was $45,500,000.

Property at Tutira was valued at 30 June 2014 to fair value on the basis of market value by M H Morice, registered valuer of Morice Ltd.  The total fair value of property valued by M H Morice as an independent valuer was $337,000.

At 30 September 2013 the Napier Port's interest in investment properties was valued at $6,660,000, resulting in no movement in the last 12 months.  This valuation was undertaken by Frank Spencer, a registered valuer with Logan Stone Ltd, using the fair value basis under the highest and best use scenario.  Mr Spencer is a member of the New Zealand Institute of Valuers.

The following amounts have been recognised in the comprehensive income statement.

Note 11(b)

Under the Hawke's Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002, residential leasehold endowment land can only be sold, using a specified valuation methodology, to the current lessee, or to a person nominated by that lessee.

 


Note 12:  Intangible Assets

Note 12(a)

In accordance with Note 2.9 assets, such as Development Expenditure, that have an indefinite life are tested for impairment at each balance sheet date.  If the asset is considered to be impaired, it must be written down to its recoverable value immediately against income.

 


Note 13:  Financial Assets & Investment in Council-controlled organisations

Note 13(a) Available-for-sale financial assets

 

The effective interest rate on government stock was 4.52% (2012-13 5.63%). This stock has an average maturity of 5.5 years (2012-13 3 years).

The effective interest rate on bank deposits with terms greater than 91 days but less than 365 days was 4.43% (2012-13 4.08%).   These deposits have an average maturity of 96 days (2012-13 64 days).

Note 13(b) Loans & receivable financial assets

Note 13(c)

There were no impairment provisions on investment financial assets in current or prior years.

Note 13(d)

The Council has provided loans to ratepayers for the installation of clean heat and insulation.  The loans are repayable by a targeted rate over a 10 year period.  Interest is charged on Insulation loans at between 6% - 7.02% and on Clean heat loans at between 3% - 3.51% at the inception of the loan.

 

 

Council's shareholding in the Port of Napier Ltd was valued to fair value on 31 March 2012 by the Corporate Finance Division of Deloitte.  These revalued shares were transferred to Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company on 28 June 2012.

Note 14:  Forestry Assets

 

Council's forestry assets comprise a total of 497 hectares of mixed forestry crops situated in the Lake Tutira Country Park (114 ha), Mahia (36 ha), Waihapua (174 ha) and Central Hawke's Bay (173 ha).  During the period no forest crops were logged (2012-13 Nil ha).

Council owned forestry assets were fair valued to $2,259,000 at 30 June 2014 (2012/13 $1,870,000) by M H Morice, a registered valuer of Morice Ltd.  The valuation assumed discount rates of 7.0%

Note 14(a)

Lake Tutira Country Park Forestry Corp consists of radiata plantings on 114 hectares situated at Tutira Country Park.  These forestry assets were valued to $1,782,706 by Morice Limited, independent valuers at 30 June 2014 (2012-13 $1,585,100).  The valuation assumed a discount rate of 7%.


Note 14(b)

Council's carbon sequestration forestry assets consist of 174 hectares of mixed plantings situated at Waihapua.  These forestry assets were fair valued to $219,605 by Morice Limited, independent valuers at 30 June 2014 (2012-13 $124,500).  The valuation assumed a discount rate of 7.0%.

Note 14(c)

Council's wastewater disposal forestry assets consist of eucalyptus and radiata pine plantings on 69 hectares at Pourere Road Waipawa, and 104 hectares at Mangatarata Road Waipukurau, and 36 hectares at Kinikini Road Mahia.  These forestry assets were fair valued to $256,437 by M H Morice of Morice Limited, independent valuers, at 30 June 2014 (2012-13 $160,700).  The valuation assumed a discount rate of 7.0%.

Note 14(e)

Council is developing 50 hectares of manuka forestry at Tutira for honey production.  The plantings of seedlings and other development costs totalling $331,803 were not valued this year.

Note 14(e)

Council does not own the land at the Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve, but in 1989 full managerial and financial control of the Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve was transferred from central government to the Council under section 16 of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941. 

Note 14(f)

Council has entered into eleven joint ventures under the Forestry Rights Agreement Act 1983 under which Council provided grants to farmers to plant and maintain to maturity soil conservation forestry crops on marginal land.  In return, Council has a right to a percentage of the profits on harvest.  A nominal value of $10 per hectare planted has been ascribed to these rights.

Note 14(g)

Council is exposed to financial risks arising from changes in timber prices.  As a long-term forestry investor, Council does not expect timber prices to decline significantly during the foreseeable future and therefore has not taken any measures to manage the risks of a decline in timber prices.  Council reviews its outlook for timber prices regularly in considering the need for active financial risk management.

Note 14(h)

Council has 14,907 NZ emission units for carbon credits.  These where valued between $3.60 and $3.90 per unit (2012-13 $1.90 and $2.05), giving a value of between $53,665 and $58,137 (2012-13 $28,323 and $30,559).  These values have not been included in these financial statements.

 


Note 15:  Trade & Other Receivables

 

Note 15(a)

Trade receivables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 day terms.

Note 15(b)

Movements in the provision for impairment of receivables are as follows.

 

Note 15(c)

The carrying amount of trade and other receivables approximates their fair value.

Note 15(d)

The status of trade receivables at reporting dates is:

 


Note 16:  Derivative Financial Instruments


Note 16(a)

The notional principal amounts of the outstanding interest rate swap contracts at 31 March 2014 were $74,500,000 (2012/13 $60,500,000).  $57,000,000 of these swaps were active at 31 March 2014.  The remaining $17,500,000 are forward starting, future dated swaps.

At 31 March 2014, the various interest rates were in the range of 4.53% to 5.34% (2012/13 4.53% to 5.34%).


Note 17:  Cash & Cash Equivalents

Note 17(a)

Cash at bank earns interest at floating rates based on daily bank deposit rates.

Note 17(b)

Short term deposits are made for varying periods up to 91 days depending on the immediate cash requirements of the Group, and earn interest at the respective short term deposit rates.

The effective interest rate on short-term bank deposits was 4.32% (2012-13 2.80%).  These deposits have an average maturity of 32 days (2012-13 2 days).

Note 17(c)

Cash, cash equivalents and bank overdrafts included the following for the purposes of the Cash Flow Statement


Note 17(d) Reconciliation of Surplus after Tax to Net Cash Flows from Operations


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 18:  Fair Value Reserves

Note 18(a)

Revaluation increments and decrements on operating and financial assets (listed above) are recorded in the Statement of Changes in Equity.  However, if revaluation decrements are greater than the corresponding surpluses in the Fair Value Reserve, the excess decrements are recorded in the Note 6, Fair Value Gains and Losses through the Income Statement, as an asset impairment.

Note 18(b)

On 28 June 2012, Council transferred its shareholding in the Port of Napier Limited to the Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company in exchange for 177,400,000 shares.  At the same time, Council transferred the remaining fair value reserve component of its Port shareholding to its Accumulated Balance.

 


Note 19:  Other Reserves (Parent & Group)

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

­      Nature and purpose of reserves

 

[1] Balance Sheet Movements

This balance reflects adjustments to balance sheet accounts to give effect to movement in the reserve accounts.  This balance also includes operating reserve balances to fund day to day cash flow and working capital requirements

 

[1a] Net fair value gains

Net fair value gains records the fair value (non-cash) component of the operating reserve.

 

[2] Infrastructure asset depreciation reserve

A reserve established to fund the renewal of scheme infrastructure assets as required by the Local Government Act 2002.

 

[3] Wairoa rivers & streams reserve

A reserve established to fund flood mitigation and recovery work within the Wairoa District.

 

[4] Special flood & drainage scheme reserves

Reserves established for each scheme to account for rating balances that arise each year as a consequence of the actual income and expenditure incurred in any one year.

 

[5] Port dividend equalisation reserve

A reserve established to smooth out the dividend receipts from the Port so that fluctuations in Council's general funding rates are minimised.

 

[6] Coastal marine area reserve

A reserve established to meet the statutory requirements on the use of rental income earned on Council's endowment leasehold land.

 

[7] Specific regional projects reserve

A reserve established to meet the statutory requirements on the use of 50% of rental income on Council's endowment leasehold land received prior to 1 July 2003.

 

[8] Asset replacement reserve

A reserve established to fund the replacement of operating property, plant and equipment, which are not scheme based.

 

[9] Regional disaster damage reserve

A reserve established to meet the commercial insurance excess of $3.0 million on each event, the uninsured 60% of edge protection damage and the costs of managing the response and recovery for a disaster event.

 

[10] Scheme disaster damage reserve

Reserves established to meet each scheme's share of Local Authority Protection Programme (LAPP) insurance excess and other costs to restore scheme assets that are not recoverable from other sources.

 

[11] Clive river dredging reserve

A reserve established to meet the expenditure of dredging requirements on the Clive River.

 

[12] Tangoio soil conservation reserve

A reserve established to separate the revenues and expenses associated with the Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve as this reserve is managed and overseen by Council on behalf of the Crown.

 

[13] Sale of land investment reserve

A reserve established to hold the proceeds of endowment leasehold land sales to be reinvested in accordance with Council's policy on "Evaluation of Investment Opportunities" approved on 30 April 2008.

 

[14] Sale of land non-investment reserve

A reserve established to hold transfers from the Sale of Land Investment Reserve to be invested in accordance with Council's policy on "Open Space Investment" approved on 25 June 2008 and Council's Investment Policy set out in the 2009-19 Long Term Plan.

 

[15] Rabbit reserve

A reserve established to fund costs expected to be incurred with growing rabbit populations. The reserve is limited to a maximum balance of $133,000.

 

[16] Ngati Pahauwera reserve

A reserve established to ring-fence funding for Ngati Pahauwera Rivers Initiatives.  For the clean-up of the Mohaka, Waikari and Waihua Rivers and their catchments.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 20:  Borrowings

20(a) Security

Council bank loans are secured over the rating base of the Council.

 

The Napier Port have two multi option credit  facilities with Westpac, one for $50 million expiring December 2015 and the other for $60 million expiring December 2016.  The facility gives Napier Port the option to raise money on the money market, through wholesale advances or a fixed rate advance for all or any part of the commitment expiring on a date no later than the termination date.  Security is by way of a negative pledge over the assets of Napier port in respect of both sale of such assets and other security interests.

20(b) Maturity analysis of borrowings

The exposure of the Group's borrowings to interest-rate changes and the contractual repricing dates or maturity dates at the balance sheet date are as follows.

20(c) Effective interest rates

The effective interest rates at the balance sheet are as follows.


20(d) Fair values

The carrying amount for the fair value of non-current borrowings is as follows.

The fair values as based on cash flows discounted using a rate based on the borrowing rate of 6.45%. The carrying amount of borrowings repayable within one year approximate their fair value.

20(e) Undrawn facilities

The Group has the following undrawn borrowing facilities.

20(f) Internal Borrowings

The following internal borrowings have been funded by Council reserves.

Loans for Clean Heat, Dalton Street Building Remediation, Computer and Hydrology Equipment were borrowed at 30 June 2013 so no repayments or interest were paid for the 2012-13 financial year.

The loan to the Heat Smart project was a temporary loan facility until external borrowing is completed in the 2013-14 financial year.

Note 21:  Deferred Income Tax (Group)

Note 22:  Employee Benefit Liabilities

 

Note 22(a) Movement in employee benefit liability


Note 23:  Trade & Other Payables

Trade payables are non-interest bearing and are generally on 30 day terms.

The carrying amount of trade and other payables approximates their fair value.

 

Note 24:  Provisions for Other Liabilities and Charges

Note 24(a)

In December 2013 Council entered into a contract with the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) to sell the cash flows generated from the portfolio of Napier leasehold properties for a period of 50 years ending 30 June 2063 (after a free-holding initiative to lessees).  A lump sum of $37.7 million was received for this to fund investment activity.  The liability to ACC reduces by any sales of leasehold property during the year as these are paid to ACC during as compensation for lost rental income over the 50 term.

 


Note 25:  Related-Party Disclosures (Group)

Note 25(a) The following transactions were carried out with subsidiaries

Note 25(b) Transactions with key management personnel

During the year Councillors and key management personnel, as a part of normal customer relationship, were involved in minor transactions with Group (such as payment of rates, purchases of small amounts of goods and services).

Note 25(c) Year-end balances arising from sales/purchases of goods and services

Note 25(d) Terms and conditions of transactions with related parties

Sales to and purchases from related parties are made in arm's length transactions at both normal market prices and normal commercial terms.

Outstanding balances at year end are unsecured and settlement occurs in cash.

There have been no guarantees provided or received for any related party receivables.

At year end, there is no impairment relating to amounts owed by related parties (2012-13 $nil).

 

Note 26:  Commitments & Contingencies

Note 26 (a) Capital commitments

Capital expenditure contracted for at balance sheet date but not yet incurred as follows.

On 29 October 2012 the Napier Port entered into a contract with Gottwald Port Technology GmbH for the purchase and supply of two mobile harbour cranes at a cost of $10,016,452. These cranes were delivered to the Napier Port in September 2013 and went into service in December 2013. The Napier Port had put in place foreign exchange contracts to mitigate exchange rate risk.

Note 26 (b) Operating lease commitments

The Group has entered into commercial leases for certain offices, plant and equipment under non-cancellable operating lease agreements.  The leases have varying terms and conditions.

Future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows.

Note 26 (c) Contingencies

­      In respect of the Council only:

The Dalton Street building owned by the Council has had extensive remedial work completed as a result of water ingress.  This was started during the 2012-13 financial year and was completed in the 2013-14 year.  The total cost of the project was $2,024,483. Legal action is continuing but it is yet to be determined what compensation will be recovered.

The Tangoio Soil Conservation Reserve fund contains the proceeds from the Reserve since management and control of the Reserve was vested in Council in 1985, less the cost of managing the Reserve.  This fund is held by Council on behalf of the Crown.  The value of the funds at 30 June 2014 are $3,927,462 (2012-13 $3,017,079).

At balance date Council has a provision of $272,808 in respect of the New Zealand Mutual Liability Riskpool calls to cover the costs of leaky building existing claims for the five years to 30 June 2014.  Riskpool did not cover new claims on leaky buildings from 1 July 2009.  This provision was based on the best information from the Board of Riskpool, but may not be sufficient to cover all claims eventually settled.  In the five year period to 30 June 2014 Council has paid out calls totalling $412,889.

­      In respect of HBRIC Ltd only:

This year and last year HBRIC Ltd recorded no contingent liabilities or assets.

 

Note 26 (d) Contractual Obligations Under LAPP Arrangements

As a part of Council's insurance programme covering damage to Council's infrastructure assets in the event of a natural disaster, Council has insurance cover above a deductible of $1,259,000 for 40% of the cost of repair with the Local Authority Protection Programme (LAPP).

LAPP is a mutual scheme involving approximately 57 local authority members.  This scheme has an obligation on all members for a payment of up to five times Council's annual premium, payable in any one event impacting on any of the LAPP members. In any one year Council's exposure is to cover a maximum of two events.

Council's annual premium covering the financial year 2013-14 equals $234,400 excluding GST, which means that Council's maximum obligation would amount to $2,344,000 in the event of two very large natural disasters in any one year.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 27 Local Government Act 2002 Disclosures

Note 27(a) Remuneration of Chairman and Elected Members of Council

Remuneration of Elected Members of the Council includes salary, vehicle allowance, meeting and hearing fees that, during the year, were paid or payable to the Councillor by the Council or any council organisation.  Remuneration levels are set each year for all local authorities by the Remuneration Authority.

Note that the number of meetings attended above report elected members' attendance at advertised meetings of the Regional Council, Council Committees, Council led stakeholder groups, bodies to which Councillor appointments have been made, Council workshops and Hearing panels (excludes paid consent hearings).

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

The Chairman is provided with a vehicle to use on Council business.  Use of a vehicle reduces the Chairman's salary in accordance with Remuneration Authority policy.

Note 27(b) Remuneration of Chief Executive

The Chief Executive of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council received a salary of $330,091 for the year ended 30 June 2014 (2013; $264,423).

The Chief Executive was seconded to HBRIC Limited for the full year and the salary figure includes a higher duties allowance of $62,347 which was funded by HBRIC Limited.

An interim Chief Executive was appointed to cover the Chief Executive role for the secondment period and received a salary of $202,424.

For the year ended 30 June 2014, the value of the total remuneration package received by the Chief Executive (including the value of non-financial benefits) was $361,425 (2013; $293,172), while the total remuneration package received by the interim Chief Executive was $224,511.

Note 27(c) Severance Payments

During the year one severance payment was made to council employees (2012-13; four payments totalling $101,246)

Note 27(d) Council Employees

Total remuneration includes non-financial benefits provided to employees.

At balance date, the Council employed 154 (2013; 154) full-time employees, with the balance of staff representing 9.7 (2013; 10.5) full-time equivalent employees.  A full-time employee is determined on the basis of a 40-hour working week.

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 28: Major Budget Variances (Parent)

The Council published prospective financial information in relation to the 2013/14 year in its 2013/14 Annual Plan.  Explanations for the major variances from the forecast figures published in the Annual Plan are set out below:

28 (i) Comprehensive Income Statement

Operating revenue is $3.5 million or 9% more than budget.  This variance is explained below:

Revenue from Council activities is $343,000 or 6% less than budgeted due to:

·      Regulation income is down $0.6 million.  Consent processing income was down on budget as a result of low numbers of consent applications and some staff vacancies not being filled. 

·      Regional Resources income is down $0.5 million.  This was mainly due to a reduction of gravel extraction income due to low demand and lower Section 36 charges.

·      Land and Drainage income was up $0.5 million due to an increase in external income earned by the HBRC Works Group.

Other revenue is $1.6 million or 9% more than budget due to:

·      Rental income is $1 million or 62% more than budgeted due to deferral of the sale of Wellington Leasehold property.

·      Interest income is $1.2 million or 24% less than budget as the sale of the Wellington Leasehold property did not take place and interest rates were not as high as had been forecast in the budget.

·      Grant income is $2 million or 64% more than budget due to Council receiving funding from the Ministry for the Environment to distribute to Ngati Pahauwera for the cleanup of the Mohaka, Waikari and Waihua Rivers and their catchments.

·      There was also a loss on disposal on the sale of endowment leasehold property of $4,000 which continue to sell even though Council are no longer offering discounts as an incentive for leaseholders to freehold their properties.  The Council has taken a loss on investment in VHB writing off the debt and investment costs of $292,000. The Council has taken a loss on Infrastructure Assets of $335,000 for the write off feasibility work that has not been capitalised.

·      Other income is $213,000 over budget due to uncollectable rates provisions which are no longer required and have been released

Fair value gains are $2.2 million or 130% above budget mainly due to an increase in the value of leasehold land and forestry crops.

Expenses from Council activities is $1.4 million or 4% less than budgeted due to:

·      Governance and Community Engagement expenditure is down $1.0 million due to the targeted assistance for the Te Mata Park Visitor Centre and the upgrade of the Wairoa Community Centre not being drawn down in the 2013/14 year and has been carried forward to the 2014/15 year. 

·      Regulation and Emergency Management costs are down $0.5 million due to staff vacancies and delays in recruitment.

Finance costs are $469,000 above budget due to the treatment of the leasehold annuity fees which are paid to ACC in return for their lump sum contribution.  These fees make up $1,728,000 of the total finance costs.

Other comprehensive income is $3.2 million less than budget due to the revaluation of Infrastructure Assets.

28 (ii) Operating Surplus / (Deficit) & Statement of Changes in Equity

The operating surplus / (deficit) (total recognised revenue and expenses) is $480,000 more than budget.  The major causes for this are set-out above.

 

 

28 (iii) Balance Sheet

Equity is $7.0 million or 1.5% less than budget.

Property, plant & equipment assets are $5.9 million less than budget due to the fair value write downs at the end of the 2012/14 year and the deferral of the $630,000 to be spent on the Guppy Road and Wairoa properties.

Infrastructure assets are $10.5 million (6.5%) less than budget due mainly to the revaluation variances on river control assets.

Investment property is $1.1 million (1.1%) less than budget due to actual sales of endowment leasehold property exceeding those forecast.

Intangible assets are $675,000 less than budget as a result the timing of internal system integration projects and amortisation.

Cash, cash equivalents and financial assets are $1.3 million more than budget as the $37 million received from the sale of leasehold property cash flows has been retained for longer than had been budgeted for due to the slowdown in the RWSS decision making process.  Also the mix of Current and Non-Current financial assets has changed due to the requirements of when these funds might be required.

Advances to Council-controlled organisations are $12 million less than budget due to the deferral of the Whakatu Road/Rail Hub project.

Current and Non-current borrowings taken together are $6.1 million less than budget because loan funding for Solar Hot Water, Open Spaces and Regional Infrastructure were not drawn down this financial year.

Provisions for other liabilities and charges are $17 million less due to the sale value of leasehold property cash flows reducing from $51 million to $38 million due to the influx of sell downs before the sale was completed.

28 (iv) Cash flow statement

Net cash out flows from operating activities are $2.4 million more than budget mainly due to a decrease in expenditure and an increase in overall income.

Net cash outflows from investing activities are $4.5 million less than budget.  The main reasons for this are the $4 million increase in financial assets being the increase in bank deposits from the sale of leasehold land, $2.0 million decrease in the construction of infrastructure assets and the $13.0 million decrease in advances to HBRIC Ltd offset by $24.4 million increase in the purchase of financial assets which is the investment of the money received from the sale of leasehold property cash flows.

Net cash inflows from financing activities was $32 million more than budget due to $37 million received sale of leasehold property cash flows which the budget assumed was received in the 2012/13 year.

 

28 (v) Significant asset acquisitions or replacements

There were no other significant asset acquisitions or replacements.

 

 


Note 29:  Financial Risk Management

­      Introduction

The Group's principal financial instruments comprise bank loans, government stock, shares in listed companies and the Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company, cash and bank term investments.  The main purposes of these financial instruments are to raise finance for the Group's operations and to generate income.

The Group also enters into derivatives, consisting principally of interest rate swaps and forward currency contracts.  The purpose is to manage interest rate and currency risks arising from the Group's operations and its sources of finance.

The Group has various other financial instruments such as trade debtors and trade creditors, which arise directly from its operations.

Other than government stock and shares in listed companies, the Group does not trade in financial instruments.

­      Market Risk

Price Risk

Price risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate as a result of changes in market prices.  The Group is exposed to equity and securities price risk on its investments, which are classified as available for sale and held to maturity financial assets.  The Group manages price risk by diversification of its investment portfolio in accordance with limits set out in its investment policy.

The Group holds shares in companies listed on various world stock exchanges.  If these exchanges at 30 June 2014 had fluctuated by plus or minus 0.5% and the value of the shareholdings had moved proportionately the effect would have been to increase or decrease the fair value through equity reserve by $4,922 (2012-13 $5,835).

Currency Risk

Currency risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates.

From time to time the Group enters into transactions denominated in foreign currencies and uses forward and spot foreign exchange contracts to manage its exposures to currency fluctuations.

If the currencies in which the Group has contract exposures at 30 June 2014 had fluctuated by plus or minus 0.5%, the effect would have been to increase or decrease profit or loss by $1,645 (2012-13 $43,135).

Interest Rate Risk

The interest rates on the Group's investments are show at Note 13 and on borrowings at Note 20.

Fair Value Interest Rate Risk

Fair value interest rate risk is the risk that the value of a financial instrument will fluctuate due to change in market interest rates.  Borrowing and investing at fixed rates exposes the Group to fair value interest rate risk.  The Group does not usually hedge against this risk.

If interest rates on borrowings at 30 June 2014 had fluctuated by plus or minus 0.5%, the effect would have been to increase or decrease the fair value through equity reserves by $397,000 (2012-13 $346,000).

If interest rates on government and local body stock at 30 June 2014 had fluctuated by plus or minus 0.5%, the effect would have been to increase or decrease the fair value through equity reserves by $13,970 (2012-13 $17,600).


 

 

Cash Flow Interest Rate Risk

Cash flow interest rate risk is the risk that the cash flows from a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes to market interest rates.  Borrowing at variable interest rates exposes the Group to cash flow interest rate risk.

The Group manages its cash flow interest rate risk on borrowings by using interest rate caps and floating to fixed interest rate swaps.

If interest rates on borrowings at 30 June 2014 had fluctuated by plus or minus 0.5%, the effect would have been to increase or decrease  the surplus after tax by $397,000 (2012-13 $346,200) as a result of higher or lower interest expense on variable rate borrowings.

­      Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk that a third party will default on its obligation to the Group, causing it to incur a loss.  The Group has no significant concentrations of credit risk, as it has a large number of credit customers, mainly ratepayers.  Under the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, the Council has powers to recover outstanding debts from ratepayers.  The Group has a policy of assessing the credit risk of significant new customers and monitors the credit quality of existing customers.

The Group invests funds only with registered banks, government stock and its investment policy limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution or organisation.

Investments in other local authorities are secured by charges over rates. The Group only invests in other entities with a minimum credit rating from Standard & Poors (or other credit agency of similar reputation) of A1 for short term debt (up to twelve months) or A+ for term debt (more than twelve months).

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Note 29 (a):  Financial Risk Management

­      Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty raising liquid funds to meet commitments as they fall due.

The Council maintains a level of cash operating balances sufficient to meet its commitments as they fall due as well as managing its borrowings in accordance with its funding and financial policies.  Napier Port operates a multi-option credit facility with its bank as set out in Note 20.

Set out below is a contractual maturity analysis of financial liabilities as at balance sheet date.  The contractual amount includes scheduled interest payments.


­      Foreign Exchange Risk

The Group enters into transactions denominated in foreign currencies from time to time and is thereby exposed to the risk that movements in foreign currency rates may cause a financial loss to the Group.

The Group uses forward and spot foreign exchange contracts to manage its exposure.  The contract amounts of foreign exchange instruments outstanding at balance date are:

Note 29 (b): Capital Management

Council's capital is its equity (or ratepayers' funds), which comprise accumulated funds and reserves.  Equity is represented by net assets.

The Local Government Act 2002 (the Act) requires Council to manage its revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, investments, and general financial dealings prudently and in a manner that promotes the current and future interests of the community.  Ratepayers' funds are largely managed as a by-product of managing revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, investments and general financial dealings.

The objective of managing these items is to achieve intergenerational equity, which is a principle promoted in the Act and applied by the Council.  Intergenerational equity requires ratepayers to meet the costs of utilising the Council's assets and not expecting them to meet the full cost of long-term assets that will benefit ratepayers in future generations. Additionally, the Council has in place asset management plans for major classes of assets detailing renewal and maintenance programmes to ensure that ratepayers in future generations are not required to meet the costs of deferred renewals and maintenance.

The Act requires the Council to make adequate and effective provision in its Long Term Plan (LTP) and in its Annual Plan (where applicable) to met the expenditure needs identified in those plans, and the Act sets out the factors that the Council is required to consider when determining the most appropriate sources of funding for each of its activities.

The sources and levels of funding are set out in the funding and financial policies in the Council's most recent LTP (2012-2022 Ten Year Plan).

HBRC has the following Council-created reserves:

-       reserves for different areas of benefit, and

-       self-insurance reserves.

Reserves for different areas of benefit are used where there is a discrete set of rate of levy payers as distinct from payers of general rates.  Any surplus or deficit relating to these separate areas of benefit is applied to the specific reserves.

Self-insurance reserves are built up annually from general rates and are made available for specific unforeseen events.

The release of these funds can generally be approved only by Council.

 

Note 30 Non-current assets held for sale

Note 31 Events After Balance Sheet Date (Parent & Group)

There were no significant events after balance date.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Financial Impact Statements

The following information is presented for compliance with Local Government (Financial Reporting) Regulations 2011.  In accordance with the regulations, the information presented is incomplete (in particular, the information presented does not include depreciation and internal transaction such as overheads) and it is not prepared in compliance with generally accepted accounting practice.  It should not be relied upon for any other purpose than compliance with the Local Government (Financial Reporting) Regulations 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

General Information

Information is available from Council on a range of matters relating to projects it has undertaken, meetings held and research it has been involved in, including:

-       Council meeting agendas and minutes

-       Technical reports

-       Educational material

-       Correspondence

-       Pamphlets and newsletters

-       Council’s website – www.hbrc.govt.nz .

If it is necessary to obtain information under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act please contact the Governance and Administration Manager or Communications Co-ordinator, but note that information is usually readily available without the need for a formal request.

 

Legislative Framework

It is important to note that there are numerous statutes, which specifically identify regional councils as having a specific function and role in various activities. These include:

-       Biosecurity Act 1993

-       Building Act 2004

-       Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002

-       Hawke’s Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002

-       Land Drainage Act 1908

-       Land Transport Management Act 2003 and Land Transport Management Amendment Act 2008

-       Local Electoral Act 2001

-       Local Electoral Act 2001 Amendment Act 2013

 

-       Local Government Act 2002

-       Local Government (Rating) Act 2002

-       Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2012

-       Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Act 2014

-       Maritime Transport Act 1994

-       Public Transport Management Act 2008

-       Resource Management Act 1991

-       Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941

-       Hawke’s Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002

 

Plans we use

The Local Government Act 2002 (the Act) came fully into effect on 1 July 2003. This Act requires Council to produce the following plans and reports:

-       A Long Term Plan 2012-22, prepared under Section 93 of the Act (Adopted June 2009)

-       The Annual Report for the financial year ending 30 June 2013 is prepared under Section 98 of the Act.

The reporting will also include ‘a summary of information’ contained in the Annual Report for both the Annual Report and the Long Term Plan.

The Resource Management Act 1991 gives the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council the responsibility for promoting the sustainable management of the natural and physical resources of the region. The Council has produced a Regional Policy Statement, in line with the requirements of the Act, which establishes a planning framework to balance the demands placed on the natural resources by users.

In addition to the Regional Policy Statement, the Resource Management Act enables Council to develop plans containing rules and regulations by which the management of the natural resources will be carried out.

The following resource management plans, prepared by the Council have legal status:

-       Regional Resource Management Plan (incorporating the Regional Policy Statement) (operative 28 August 2006) plus associated Plan Changes 1-6.

-       Regional Coastal Plan (operative June 1999)

-       Proposed Regional Coastal Environment Plan (adopted by Council on 31 October 2012 incorporating Variations 1-3). This Plan was recently approved by the Minister of Conservation and so it will be made operative in September 2014.  At that time, it will fully replace the 1999 Regional Coastal Plan.

The Resource Management Act also requires the Council to monitor the state of the environment, so State of the Environment (SoE) reports are produced. The latest five-yearly SoE report was completed in 2009-10. The next SoE report will be produced in 2014-15.

The Biosecurity Act 1993 allows the Council to undertake biosecurity functions provided they have developed a Pest Management Strategy. The Regional Pest Management Strategy has been developed in accordance with the Biosecurity Act 1993 and sets out Council’s goals and objectives with regard to its biosecurity functions. The current Regional Pest Management Strategy was adopted by the Council in March 2013 and must be reviewed again by March 2018.

A revised Regional Land Transport Strategy (RLTS) was adopted by the Council in June 2012. The RLTS will be replaced by the Regional Land Transport Plan as required under the amended Land Transport Management Act 2003.

A revised Regional Public Transport Plan was adopted by the Council in June 2011. This will be revised by June 2015 as required under the amended Land Transport Management Act 2003.

 

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

About Hawke’s Bay Regional Council

Council Committee Structure


Management Structure

 


HBRC Audited 2013-14 Annual Report

Attachment 1

 

Key Implementation milestones and activities for the 2011 National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

 

 

Status key (for 2013-2014 period)

NPSFM Objectives

 

Completed within Programme’s indicative timeframe

A1 – safeguarding life-supporting capacity etc. (water quality)

B3 – efficient allocation and use (water quantity)

In progress during Programme’s indicative timeframe

A2 – overall water quality in region

B4 – significant values of wetlands (water quantity)

 

Not started during Programme’s indicative timeframe

B1 – safeguarding life-supporting capacity etc. (water quantity)

C1 – integrated management of land and fresh water

Implementation activity/phase ongoing

B2 – over-allocation (water quantity)

D1 – tangata whenua roles and interests

Implementation not programmed in current reporting period

 

 

 

Activity

2012-
2013 Status

2013- 2014 Status

Comment on 2013 – 2014 progress

Principal 2011 NPSFM Objective(s) relevant to Activity (indicative only)

Obj A1

Obj A2

Obj B1

Obj B2

Obj B3

Obj B4

Obj C1

Obj D1

Change 4 (Built Environment) to Hawke's Bay Regional Resource Management Plan – appeals on decisions phase

Council released its decisions on 26 March 2013. Transpower NZ Ltd had lodged an appeal with the Environment Court against some of the Council’s decisions on Change 4.  That appeal was resolved by negotiation and Change 4 became operative on 1 January 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

l

 

Change 5 (Land use and Freshwater) to Hawke's Bay Regional Resource Management Plan -

appeals on decisions phase

Council released its decisions on submissions on 5 June 2013.  Four appeals were lodged with the Environment Court against some of the Council’s decisions on Change 5.  Three Environment Court-assisted mediation sessions were held during the 2013-14 period.  By end of the reporting period, parties had reached in-principle agreement to settle the majority of appeal points.  One matter is likely to require an Environment Court hearing fixture in 2014-15 period.  Another matter requires external expertise to assess the extent of six ephemeral wetlands in the region before parties can agree that matter is settled.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Plan Change 6 (Tukituki Catchment)

Submissions, hearing and decisions phase

Plan Change 6 (Tukituki Catchment) was publicly notified on 4th May 2013.  Change 6 was called-in by the Environment and Conservation Ministers (via the Environmental Protection Authority) so it is part of the Tukituki Catchment Proposal (in conjunction with applications for the Ruataniwha Water Storage project). Board of Inquiry’s hearings held over 18 November 2013 to 21 January 2014.

 

The Board issued its draft decision on 15 April 2014 and subsequently issued its final decisions on 26 June.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

High Court appeals phase

Two appeals against the Board’s decisions were lodged in the High Court on points of law.  Resolution of those appeals will be during the 2014-15 period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plan Change: Mohaka River catchment

Stakeholder engagement and policy drafting

An update report was presented to the Regional Planning Committee in February 2014. That update included reporting on a management framework for the Taharua sub-catchment, a stakeholder engagement proposal and water quality monitoring trends.

For wider Mohaka catchment, supporting science continued to be progressed, stakeholder engagement has occurred in targeted interviews, focus groups during the reporting period.  Mohaka Consultation Group is yet to be formed as a sounding board for issues, options, choices and plan drafting prior to notification of a plan change.  A consultant was engaged to prepare an initial assessment of recreational use and values within the Mohaka River catchment.

Extension to the time frame for plan change notification was included in the 2013-14 Annual Plan (i.e. notification Dec 2014).

l

l

l

 

 

 

l

l

Plan Change: Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri

Stakeholder engagement and policy drafting

An update report was presented to the Regional Planning Committee in September 2013.  A collaborative stakeholder group (the ‘TANK Group’) has been discussing management options for groundwater and surface water resources in the Greater Heretaunga and Ahuriri area (which includes the Tutaekuri, Ahuriri, Ngaruroro and Karamu catchments, the Heretaunga aquifers and the receiving marine environments).  The TANK Group has prepared a report outlining the Group’s 45 interim agreements.  That report was presented to the Regional Planning Committee in February 2014 where the RPC endorsed the TANK Group’s work and agreed to have particular regard to any consensus outcome from the group should one emerge. Previously (August 2012), the Council gave a good faith commitment to support any consensus recommendations (that are consistent with other planning documents) from the TANK Group.

Extension to the time frame for regional plan change notification was included in the 2013-14 Annual Plan (i.e. notification Dec 2016).

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Plan Change: urban stormwater

This Plan Change aligns with Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri plan change and the policy development will stem from the collaborative process being undertaken by the ‘TANK’ Group.

Council adopted its progressive implementation programme for NPS for Freshwater Management in September 2012.  That programme indicates stormwater plan change notification in parallel to the regional plan change for Greater Heretaunga / Ahuriri Catchment Area (i.e. notification Dec 2016).

l

l

 

 

 

 

l

l

RPS and/or plan change: 2010 Coastal Policy Statement implementation

No specific investigations dedicated to solely the coastal environment were necessary during the period. Gap analysis of RCEP against 2010 NZCPS was commenced using a consultant and will be completed in early 2014-15 period.  Meanwhile, staff resources were redirected to other projects.  Nonetheless, a number of indirectly related investigations have been commissioned in relation to catchment-based regional plan changes (e.g.: Tukituki and Greater Heretaunga/Ahuriri areas) where the coast is ultimately those catchment areas’ receiving environments.

Minister of Conservation issued his approval (on 19 June 2014) of the RCEP’s coastal marine area-related provisions over 18 months after the provisions were forwarded to his office.

l

l

 

 

 

 

l

l

Biodiversity Strategy

Project scoping commenced and completed.  Terms of Reference for Working Group have been developed.  Working Group’s first meeting held in October 2012 focussing on gaining an understanding of what the individuals in the group were doing in the biodiversity area and how best to work as a group in the future.  Steering group have met and begun developing the strategy objectives.  Steering group members have been reviewed and Mana Whenua connections made to contribute to the development.  Refinement of Biodiversity Accord complete with accord concepts to be further refined through the steering group. 

Inventory work is completed and informed further field investigations undertaken in the 2013-14 summer period.

Due to staff focus on priority projects, the timeline has been revised and the Strategy is now scheduled to be completed in early 2015.  A programme for work relevant to HBRC for inclusion in the next Long Term Plan will be prepared in 2014-2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPS Change for Biodiversity (significant wetlands)

Policy development is subject to completion of the Regional Biodiversity Strategy.

l

l

l

 

 

l

l

l

Identification of outstanding freshwater bodies

Preliminary desktop review and scoping of information regarding possible evaluation criteria was undertaken during preparation of RRMP Change 5 (2012-13 period).  Further criteria development and waterbody assessment by HBRC was parked pending in particular, development of national guidance on this issue by Ministry for the Environment, and the resolution of Change 5 appeals.  In June, Council lodged an application to MfE’s Community Environment Fund to provide resourcing for a proposal to develop criteria, a methodology and run ‘pilot’ project in Hawke's Bay for identification of outstanding freshwater bodies.  As at 1 August 2014, the Minister for the Environment was yet to announce if that funding application was successful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPS Change for outstanding freshwater bodies

Policy development is subject to completion of the identification of outstanding freshwater bodies.

l

l

l

 

 

 

l

l

Plan change: rest of region

No specific policy development activity during the 2013-14 period.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Specific plan effectiveness monitoring programmes (Tukituki; Taharua/Mohaka; Heretaunga/Ahuriri)

Specific plan effectiveness monitoring and reporting not yet developed.  Development of implementation plan (and associated plan effectiveness monitoring programme) to be a focus during the 2014-15 period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RPS/ Plan Effectiveness Reporting/Review

No specific plan effectiveness monitoring and reporting scheduled during the 2013-14 period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOE Reporting and Review (5 yearly, annual)

Council undertakes monthly and annual reporting on specific investigations carried out in that reporting period.  Every five years Council undertakes State of the Environment Reporting to assess longer term trends.  Council is currently compiling the five-yearly state of the environment report due for publication in late 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Afforestation Scheme

Council proposed to work in partnership with landowners with highly erodible land to promote afforestation of the steepest and least productive portion of their land in return for a share of carbon credit revenue.  The afforestation of steep, highly erodible hill country would likely improve water quality in rivers due to reduced sediment from erosion.  This project commonly known as ‘Trees on Farms’ has been put on hold indefinitely as the current down turn in carbon prices has significantly reduced the economic viability of the project as a working model.  In 2013, Council instructed staff to explore other options and seek other economic drivers for investment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Water Storage Investigations – Ruataniwha & Ngaruroro/Heretaunga Plains

A pre-feasibility study was completed for the Ngaruroro/ Heretaunga Plains catchment in 2011.  An on farm economic assessment to determine the viability of water storage for the Ngaruroro catchment needs to be conducted.  This will help to establish if the project should proceed to a feasibility investigation.  This economic assessment was due for completion in 2012 however it has been deferred due to resource constraints.  It is anticipated that recommendations will be made to Council in 2015.  This is being considered as part of the Greater Heretaunga / Ahuriri policy development work.

Consent applications for the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme (RWSS) were lodged with the Environmental Protection Authority on May 2013 and were subsequently called in by the Environment and Conservation Ministers as part of the ‘Tukituki Catchment Proposal’ (alongside Plan Change 6) . The RWSS applications were notified by the EPA on 6 July 2013.  The Board issued its draft decisions on 15 April 2014 and subsequently issued its final decision on 26 June.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Science investigations to support plan changes including nutrient modelling; groundwater modelling; instream flow assessments; water quality monitoring; flow gauging; surface water/ groundwater interactions for Heretaunga Plains

Targeted water quality investigations are on-going and feed into the Tukituki, TANK and Mohaka Plan Changes. This is over and above Council’s statutory obligations for monitoring surface water quality throughout the region. The objectives of the work is to better define current state; define and understand ecological and physical-chemical conditions and dynamics; and allow for effective limit setting in relation to water quality limits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Implementation of Water Measuring Regulations

The first phase of the transitional Resource Management (Measurement and Reporting of Water Takes) Regulations 2010 came into force on 10 November 2012.  This affected approximately 950 consents of which 450 new water meter installations were required, for consented rates of at 20 litres/second or more.  Council reached effective 100% compliance with the Regulations by September 2013.  The second phase of the transitional Regulations comes into force from 10 November 2014 for water takes of 10 litres/second or more, but less than 20 litres/second.  Council is currently progressing with the verification of phase two and anticipates full compliance will be achieved by the November 2014 timeframe.

 

Of those water takes that are currently required to be metered (i.e. required by the Regulations or consent conditions), approximately 40% supply that data by telemetry (daily cellphone communications) to HBRC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facilitation of water user groups

Council is continuing to work with water users to establish efficient water use through alternative water management options.  This is on a ‘where and when’ basis due to resourcing limitations (funding and staffing levels).  Council has facilitated the establishment of key water user groups such as the Ngaruroro Irrigation Society and the Twyford Irrigators Group.  Both of these water user groups are part of the TANK collaborative stakeholder group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Management and mitigation plans

Council is working towards an adaptive management framework with key stakeholders to achieve limits and targets in Tukituki Plan Change 6.  Phosphorus management plans within priority sub-catchments are proposed to address phosphorus loads using specific mitigation methods suited to the situation.  Methods could include afforestation of hill country to address sediment migration into waterways.  The Phosphorous Management Framework is in the final development stages in conjunction with AgResearch,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Facilitation of catchment groups for non-point source discharges

Council is working on an adaptive management framework to manage non-point source discharges from land into water.  A pilot is being developed for the Tukituki Catchment that will comprise an overall facilitation group informed by the primary industry pan sector which then supports six sub-catchment operational groups which comprises landowners, Hapu and HBRC.  The objectives of the pilot are to build the capacity within the sub-catchment groups to enable them to self manage to reduce/mitigate contaminant discharges with a focus on nutrients.

 

The pilot is being in run in the Papanui catchment.  In the past year there has been significant science investment which has run in parallel to the development of a Catchment Management Plan and in tandem with significant community engagement.  A mauri monitoring pilot is also under development for the catchment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Big Six

Attachment 2

 


The Big Six

Attachment 2

 








The Big Six

Attachment 2

 

  



[1] The 2011 NPSFM required councils to fully implement it by 2030.  Amendments made by the Government to the NPSFM that come into effect from 1 August 2014 require the NSPFM to be fully implemented by 2025.

[2] NPSFM Policy E1(e) reads:

Where a regional council has adopted a programme of staged implementation, it is to publicly report, in every year, on the extent to which the programme has been implemented.

[3] PM10 monitoring is measurement of the mass concentration of particulate material smaller than 10 µm, expressed as a 24-hour average value.