Meeting of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council

 

 

Date:                 Wednesday 25 June 2014

Time:                9.00am

Venue:

Council Chamber

Hawke's Bay Regional Council

159 Dalton Street

NAPIER

 

Attachments Excluded From Agenda

 

item       subject                                                                                                                   page

  

8.         Decision on Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme Investment

Attachment 1:     Sainsbury Logan and Williams Legal opinion 8 April 2014                2

Attachment 2:     Sainsbury Logan & Williams Legal opinion 18 June 2014              13

Attachment 3:     Table of Responses - changes to legal documents                        15

Attachment 4:     Answers to questions raised by submitters                                     19

Attachment 5:     Alternative off-river options investigated                                         24

Attachment 6:     BoI evidence for on-farm storage investigation                              26

Attachment 7:     Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Technical Feasibility Report - reservoir level                                                                                                        32

Attachment 8:     Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment         34

Attachment 9:     Extract from Draft BoI decision on Flow Statistics                       261

Attachment 10:   Extract from Draft BoI decision on movement of river gravel     262

Attachment 11:   Update on water user agreements and legal report                      268

Attachment 12:   HBRIC Ltd Letter and Scope of Due Diligence                            273

11.       Adoption of the Hawke's Bay Regional Council 2014-15 Annual Plan

Attachment 2:     HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction                        278

Attachment 3:     HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities                          304

Attachment 4:     HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information         372    


Sainsbury Logan and Williams Legal opinion 8 April 2014

Attachment 1

 












Sainsbury Logan & Williams Legal opinion 18 June 2014

Attachment 2

 



Table of Responses - changes to legal documents

Attachment 3

 





Answers to questions raised by submitters

Attachment 4

 






Alternative off-river options investigated

Attachment 5

 


Alternative off-river options investigated

Attachment 5

 


BoI evidence for on-farm storage investigation

Attachment 6

 







Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Technical Feasibility Report - reservoir level

Attachment 7

 



Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 






















Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 



























Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 




Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 





Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 

























Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 






Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 










Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 




















Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 







Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 





Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 











Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 






Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 





















Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 





























Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 




Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 



Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 



Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 




Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 














Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 













Extract from Tonkin and Taylor Sedimentation Assessment

Attachment 8

 


Extract from Draft BoI decision on Flow Statistics

Attachment 9

 


Extract from Draft BoI decision on movement of river gravel

Attachment 10

 







Update on water user agreements and legal report

Attachment 11

 






HBRIC Ltd Letter and Scope of Due Diligence

Attachment 12

 


HBRIC Ltd Letter and Scope of Due Diligence

Attachment 12

 





HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

                                                                                                            

 

Contents

 

Chairman and Chief Executive’s Comments........................................ 1

Financial Changes to the Long Term Plan............................................. 6

Financial Overview............................................................... 6

Rates Comparisons............................................................. 10

Financial Comparatives....................................................... 15

Amendments to the Long Term Plan (LTP) 2012-22............................ 20

Non Financial Changes to the LTP...................................................... 21

Your Councillors............................................................................... 22

 

 


 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

Chairman and Chief Executive’s Comments

 

P1020915

         Fenton Wilson                                                Liz Lambert

          Chairman                                                        Interim Chief Executive

 

We’re now approaching the final three-year phase of the Long Term Plan developed in 2012 and we’re comfortable with the progress being made, delivering against key initiatives set out for this decade.

As we move into the 2014-15 Annual Plan, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council has started a strategic planning process for the 2015 – 2025 Long Term Plan, to which councillors, numerous sector groups, community groups and individuals will no doubt contribute.

Let’s be clear, HBRC is in the business of:

·      Natural resource knowledge and management;

·      Natural hazard assessment and management;

·      Regional strategic planning (including provision of statutory plans such as the regional policy statement); and

·      The provision and assessment of regional scale infrastructure and services, notably flood risk assets, regional logistics facilities such as Napier Port, and water storage.

 

In this Annual Plan, we identify areas that differ significantly from those laid out in the current Long Term Plan or previous Annual Plan.

Please take a moment to read this introduction and the parts of this Annual Plan which relate to you. 

Year Three of the Long Term Plan

We are progressing in a number of areas based on our Long Term Plan or LTP, which include, but are not limited to:

·      Catchment based planning – The Tukituki Catchment Plan Change sits alongside the Ruataniwha Water Storage (RWS) scheme and is our best option to improve summer flows and water quality, enhance water security for users and provide for sustainable economic development. We want to maintain or enhance aquatic habitats, maintain safe contact recreation and reduce the effects of algae and slime for recreational users.  Following the Government’s Environmental Protection Authority process, guidance on policies and new limits will be finalised by June 2014. 

·      Science-informed land management - A pilot project working with farmers in the Papanui sub-catchment of the Tukituki has been established with positive community buy-in.  An ideal outcome of this project will be the use of advice, information, nutrient management plans, riparian planting, etc, to reduce nutrients entering the catchment.  If successful, this pilot programme will be extended to other water use areas.

·      Ruataniwha Water Storage (RWS) – The RWS is a key part of the Tukituki Catchment Proposal that is designed to provide greater environmental protection for fresh water in the catchment, and provide opportunities for economic growth. The RWS has gained resource consent approvals from the Environmental Protection Authority, however the workability of these consents is still being determined at the time of this plan being finalised. If the consents are not workable and the scheme is not built, HBRC will need to closely manage the subsequent reductions for existing water takes.

·    Air Quality/ HeatSmart - 2014 is a phase-out year for non-compliant fires installed before 1996 in urban areas.  As anticipated, the demand for clean heat and insulation support has increased and the programme continues to perform above the targets set to meet national emission standards by 2020.

·      Passenger Transport – The urban passenger bus service continues to grow in popularity and reflects the significant investment made by HBRC on behalf of the communities of Napier and Hastings. Total passenger trips reached another record high of 789,277 in 2013; an increase of 8.7% on 2012.  During 2013 more than 3,000 bikes were carried free-of-charge on the goBay network.

·      Biodiversity – The Biodiversity Strategy is developing under the guidance of a Steering Group which includes representatives from the broader community.  An Accord is being drafted to allow agencies, businesses and individuals to ‘sign up’ and commit to the strategy’s outcomes.  The detail of an entity to deliver the Strategy into the future is also under design.  HBRC expects to conclude the Strategy in mid 2015.

·      Regional Parks Network Plan – The move to recognise HBRC open spaces as Regional Parks was adopted by Council in November 2013.  This plan also recognises a consistent management approach for Hawke’s Bay Trails.

·      Napier Leasehold Land – HBRC has negotiated a financial agreement with the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) which transfers rental income associated with the leasehold land it owns in Napier to ACC for a period of 50 years.  In exchange, HBRC received an upfront cash payment while retaining ownership of the properties.  There is no change for the lessees or to the lease conditions under this arrangement.  The initiative was outlined in HBRC’s LTP 2012-22 and is part of Council’s long term strategy to free up capital that will allow us to invest in significant infrastructure projects that create jobs and benefit the Hawke’s Bay natural environment.

There are some areas under this Annual Plan where HBRC is altering our programme to accommodate changes in factors since our Long Term Plan decisions.  These changes are summarised as:

·      Hill Country Afforestation – HBRC is assessing high UMF (Unique Manuka Factor) Manuka as a soil conservation method on steep, erodible land and has planted 140 ha in Tūtira Regional Park.  The growth and performance of this new option is being closely monitored.

·      Ngaruroro Water Storage - The feasibility stage for Ngaruroro Water Storage investigations will commence in 2014-15, having focused resources on completion of the Ruataniwha Water Storage process.

·      Hydraulic Fracturing – The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment has released her second report on hydraulic fracturing. In response to her recommendations HBRC is proposing to make financial provision to consult with the public and prepare a Plan Change addressing oil and gas development, including the management of fracking.

·      Identification of Outstanding Freshwater Bodies – The National Policy Statement (2011) for Freshwater Management requires the protection of Outstanding Freshwater Bodies. This is detailed in the Implementation Plan adopted in September 2012. A collaborative process is has been proposed.

No other ‘right debate’ changes are planned other than what we set out and adopted in the 2012-22 Long Term Plan.

Rating

Council’s rating programme funds the expenditure for its Groups of Activities set out in Part 2 of this Plan.  Due to the continuing recessionary climate in 2013-14, a 4% total rate rise forecast in the Long Term Plan was cut back to 2.8%.

For the 2014-15 year Council reduced expenditure by $174,000 from what was indicated in the Long Term Plan by cutting overheads and external costs.  However, to maintain the delivery of our current services – and bearing in mind lower than expected market interest rate returns which offset rating charges – a rate increase of 5.8% has been set for the 2014-15 year.

In dollar terms the total annual rates are expected to rise:

·      Between $5 - $11 per property in urban areas, depending on the mix of rates on those properties;

·      Between $12 - $15 per rural property with a capital value under $500,000, and over $100 per property with a capital value over $3,000,000 depending on the mix of rates on those properties.

Napier Gisborne Railway – Proposal

HBRC’s ongoing investment strategy is to improve financial, economic and environmental benefits for the whole region by investing in sound regional infrastructure assets.

One potential infrastructure investment is the re-establishment of the Napier-Gisborne rail line as a viable alternative to the transport of freight by road. HBRC, in conjunction with private sector partners, has considered investing in the operation of a rail business carrying freight on the line. A critical component of any such investment is the agreement by KiwiRail and the Government to reopen the rail line and for them to fully fund its return and that of associated infrastructure in a good ‘fit for purpose’ condition.

The proposal from the Napier Gisborne Rail Establishment Group (NGR) aimed to:

·      Establish and operate a rail freight service between Napier and Gisborne on the existing rail line once it was returned to full operational status by the Government and KiwiRail;

·      Lease locomotives and the line from KiwiRail, purchase appropriate rolling stock from KiwiRail, or elsewhere, to operate the service;

·      Carry freight, largely logs, fruit and vegetable produce;

·      Anticipate financial losses in the first three years of operation, returning to profit in year 4 and generating significant returns to shareholders as log volumes increased – anticipated in year 6, and

·      See HBRC become a 51% shareholder in the venture, with businesses and investors in Hawke’s Bay and Gisborne District holding the remaining 49% of shares in the operating company set up for this purpose.

The proposal has claimed to benefit Hawke’s Bay with social, economic, and employment gains; improve transport infrastructure with price competitiveness and efficiency over road and rail land transport modes; safety and cost benefits through reduced heavy traffic on SH2 between Gisborne and Napier; increase volumes of exports through Napier Port; and secure an alternative transport route to road in the event of a disaster.

The NGR Group has estimated that investor funding to finance capital and operating budgets of $10.7million will comprise:

Purchase of rolling stock, plant, equipment etc                   $   5.3m

Working capital                                                                          $   2.4m

Disaster Contingency Reserve                                                 $   3.0m

                                                                                                                       ----------

Total Investor Funds Required                                                 $10.7m

A 51% shareholding investment from HBRC would be approximately $5.46m of the Total Investor Funds required over the 2014-15 to 2018-19 financial years.  An initial investment of $3.9million would be required from HBRC for the 2014-15 year.

HBRC investment in the NGR is conditional on:

·      The Government and/or KiwiRail fully funding the return of the rail line and associated infrastructure to a “good fit for purpose” operating condition;

·      Leases of the line and locomotives from KiwiRail on terms satisfactory to NGR

·      Suitable offtake agreements being concluded between NGR and customers for the freight of logs, fruit and vegetable produce over the period up to and beyond 2020 to ensure the long term viability of the service;

·      NGR’s business case being tested and accepted as satisfactory, and

·      The return to HBRC over the long-term is to cover Council’s cost of funding.

HBRC investor funds would initially be sourced from investment reserves, but ultimately would require refinancing from HBRC’s borrowing programme.

In excess of 100 submissions were received on the Napier/Gisborne Railway proposal and, while 70% were supportive of Council’s continued involvement/investment in a Napier to Gisborne rail link, 15%  were opposed to any future Council involvement with the remaining 15% of submitters recommending that Council investigate alternative uses for the rail corridor, specifically tourism related uses.

In response to these submissions Council resolved to retain in principle, the investing in the restoration of the Napier/Gisborne rail line, and indicated it would consider a revised proposal and business case from the NGR establishment group, such a business case would be subject to independent peer review before Council considered investment in the line.  Council further resolved that it would be prepared to participate in a feasibility study on the best use of the Napier/Gisborne rail corridor going forward.

Investments Proposed in the LTP 2012-22

The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council determined in the LTP that investment capital would be used for long term investment, mainly in infrastructure assets to further build the region’s economic base, enhance the performance of the regional supply chain, or specifically increase production in rural-based industries where it is believed Hawke’s Bay has its greatest economic potential.

These investments will also deliver environmental benefits and, in the medium term, will provide HBRC with a reasonable rate of return on funds invested.  The investment opportunities set out in the LTP are:

Investments managed through the Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC Ltd)

Ruataniwha Water Scheme (RWS)

Should the required conditions precedent be met, it is expected that HBRC will maintain its proposed equity stake at up to $80 million, as stated in HBRC’s Long Term Plan.  Following the receipt of a recommendation from HBRIC Ltd on 26 March 2014 and public input via a Special Consultative Process during May and early June 2014, HBRC will decide whether or not to commit to this investment. [this will be updated prior to going to print].

The investment is subject to a sustainable investment and funding model being approved by HBRC and the uptake to purchase water by the farming community being at a level that ensures a viable business case.

If these criteria are met this plan provides for an advance of $22.2m to HBRIC Ltd in the 2014-15 financial year for investment in the RWS.  The funding will be sourced from HBRC’s reserves held for investment.  This plan also assumes that there would be additional dividend cash flows received from HBRIC Ltd to cover the interest that would have been received by HBRC if current investments in bank deposits were maintained. 

Ngaruroro Water Scheme (NWS)

The LTP proposed to invest $27m in an equity stake in NWS, however, the development of this scheme to a full feasibility stage has been delayed in order to ensure that the emphasis in planning is focussed on RWS. It is proposed that in the 2014-15 year an initial on-farm economic assessment of the storage option be completed prior to committing to a full feasibility study, also potentially programmed to commence in the 2014-15 year.

Whakatu Road/ Rail Hub

The proposal for further investment in the supply chain – at an appropriate time – helps to secure the future of Napier Port as it increasingly competes with others drawing cargo from the central and southern North Island. However, the timing of this proposal has been reassessed and HBRC is not considering contributing capital to this project in 2014-15.

Investments Managed by HBRC

Hill Country Afforestation

The LTP proposed to fund the establishment of forestry blocks on erodible hill country land.  This investment requires a risk management approach covering carbon price, carbon trading mechanisms and a robust operational plan.  At the time of writing this plan, the carbon price is approximately $3 per tonne, in comparison to the $20 per tonne that drove the viable business case forward during the development of the 2012-2025 LTP.  Accordingly, it is not proposed to proceed with this investment during the 2014-15 Annual Plan period. 

HBRC will continue to evaluate forestry plantings in subsequent years.  However the decision to proceed will be conditional upon strengthening carbon prices or the availability of alternative funding sources.  HBRC plans to proceed with this investment as soon as practicable as it considers this project to be an important means to achieve environmental benefits.

The investments proposed above, specifically the RWS, will provide medium to long term significant growth and value which will, over the period of the LTP, substantially increase the value of both the HBRIC Ltd and HBRC balance sheets.

Funding Strategy for Investments as Outlined in the LTP 2012-22

At the start of the 2014-15 Annual Plan period, we estimate that HBRC has available funds of $72m to fund proposed investments.  This has been achieved by HBRC’s strategy to sell-down low-performing investment assets, specifically our investment in Napier leasehold land, thus freeing up funding for investments in projects that will provide financial and economic gain for the region.

In July 2011 HBRC approved significant discounts on the purchase price of leasehold property for lessees who wished to freehold.  This initiative was strongly supported by lessees and resulted in 378 lessees taking the opportunity to freehold at the discounted prices.  HBRC has received $27.4m from these sales.

As forecast in the LTP, the cash flows generated from the remaining portfolio of Napier leasehold properties have been sold to the Accident Compensation Corporation and a sum of $37m has been realised for investment. The LTP also proposed that HBRC’s investment in leasehold property in Wellington be sold, however this is on hold given the high level of return being achieved on this investment.

Other Changes

It is not possible to do justice to all of HBRC’s work in this brief introduction – we continue to carry out important operational activities to ensure that public services, infrastructure, and regulation are delivered efficiently and effectively. Changes to these operational activities can be found in Part 2 of this Plan, while Part 3 of this Plan identifies changes to our charges for resource management activities.

Last Words

We continue to focus on our relationships in the region and with our national partners – at a one-to-one through to a collaborative and strategic level – and encourage your ongoing interaction with HBRC through face-to-face contact, phone calls, meetings, our newsletters, website and social media channels.

 

 

Liz Lambert, Interim Chief Executive                     Fenton Wilson, Chairman

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

 


Financial Overview

Annual Plan in Brief

What we will do in 2014-15

The 2014-15 Annual Plan has been prepared using the 2012-22 LTP as its base.

Details of the HBRC’s work programmes are contained within the “Groups of Activities” Part 2 of this Plan.

HBRC intends to spend $78.93 million in 2014-15. This expenditure consists of:


 

Annual Plan Highlights

This Plan forecasts a $423,000 deficit compared with a $127,000 surplus estimated in the LTP for the 2014-15 financial year.  This includes carried forward items from the 2013-14 year of $400,000.

The total 2014-15 increase in rates of 3.9%, as proposed in the LTP, is now proposed to be 5.9%.

This increase consists of:

·      5.6% increase as a necessity to restore rates to LTP levels after a 1.3% reduction in the increase of rates in the 2013-14 year.

·      0.1% increase for the proposed targeted rates for the Opoho flood and drainage scheme (3 ratepayers).

·      0.2% increase for extra economic development of Wairoa primary sector opportunities and Oil and Gas Multi Stakeholder group initiatives.

There have been some significant changes to revenue assumptions from those used in the LTP which have affected HBRC income streams.  Briefly, these are:

·      Interest - the LTP assumed an interest rate of 5.75% on investment income for the 2014-15 year.  Due to the slow increase in the Official Cash Rate (OCR) HBRC has revised this figure to 5.1%.  This drop in interest rates combined with large investment balances has seen a sizable drop in interest revenue.

·      Returns on investments – the LTP assumed returns on investment activities for the Ruataniwha Water Scheme (RWS), Ngaruroro Water Scheme (NWS), Whakatu Road/ Rail Hub and Hill Country Afforestation.  There have been some changes to the timing and level of returns in these investments.

·      Napier leasehold free-holding and rentals - HBRC approved the free-holding to lessees of Napier leasehold land at a discount to provide funds for other investments.  This programme of sell down exceeded LTP expectations and there have also been an increased number of freeholdings even after the discount expired.  This has had the effect of there being fewer Napier leasehold properties owned by HBRC than estimated in the LTP.

·      Wellington leasehold land - The LTP also assumed the sale of the Wellington leasehold land owned by HBRC.  This has not yet taken place due to the good returns received from these investments compared to market interest rates. 

·      Forestry Income - The LTP proposed to fund the establishment of forestry blocks on erodible hill country land and assumed a carbon price of $20 per tonne to justify a viable business.  Carbon prices are now much lower than expected and HBRC has resolved not to proceed with the forestry investment during 2014-15.

·      Subvention payments - The LTP assumed a number of targeted assistance grants would be paid over the first three years of the LTP.  There were a number of delays in finalising the projects that qualified for targeted assistance.  Accordingly the majority of the proposed grants will be paid out during the 2013-14 financial year.  This will give rise to a substantial increase in the subvention payments during 2014-15 which were offset by a substantial decrease in 2013-14.

·      Dividends - The dividends received from Napier Port via HBRIC have been increased by the payment of a special dividend to cover reduced returns on other investments.

·      Napier - Gisborne Rail – HBRC has proposed to invest $3.9 million in the Napier-Gisborne Rail project with a proposed return reflecting Council’s cost of funding.  This project was not included in the LTP.

Other highlights include:

·      The LTP allowed for HBRC to provide the Bovine TB Vector Control programmes on behalf of the Animal Health Board; however from 1 July 2013 the Animal Health Board will be undertaking these programmes themselves.

·      HBRC agreed to proceed with the remedial work on the Dalton Street building. There was $1 million provided for in the LTP for this project but after detailed analysis this cost estimate increased to $2 million. Work was completed in the 2013-14 year and was funded from a combination of internal and external loans.  The legal proceedings against the contractors are ongoing with compensation used to reduce those borrowings.

·      The Clean Heat Scheme has been a huge success with good participation from the public.  The LTP assumed that homeowners would take up the clean heat loans rather than the clean heat grants.  This has turned out to be the opposite, which means that HBRC has borrowed less to fund these loans than initially anticipated.

Analysis of Total Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

Assets and Liabilities

HBRC has a strong balance sheet with assets greatly exceeding liabilities.

As at 30 June 2015 infrastructure assets are projected to total $160 million however, because of the nature of these assets (e.g. stopbanks), there are restrictions on their use and saleability.

HRBC also holds significant investments estimated to be $359 million at 30 June 2015.  Included in these investments is HBRC’s investment in HBRIC Ltd, made up of:

·      Napier Port ($187.9 million)

·      Ruataniwha Water Scheme ($31.6 million)

HBRC also has:

·      Cash balances on deposit awaiting payment to HBRIC Ltd for HBRC’s investment initiatives – the amount estimated to be held on deposit for these purposes is $41 million at 30 June 2015.

·      $51 million of Napier Leasehold endowment land and $12 million of Wellington Leasehold property.

·      $3.9 million proposed to be invested in the Napier – Gisborne Rail project.

·      $4.9 million of Forestry investments.

The chart below shows analysis of the investments projected to total $359 million at 30 June 2015.

HBRC has a policy of raising loans to fund certain types of capital expenditure such as the construction of river control and flood protection assets.  These loans are taken out on behalf of certain river control and flood protection scheme ratepayers and will be fully repaid by them during the period covered by the term of the loan.

Loan funding achieves intergenerational equity by ensuring that a portion of the cost of the major projects is paid for by the beneficiaries of the service over the year to which the benefit applies.

In this plan the HBRC proposes to borrow up to $8.2 million in the 2014-15 financial year. Of that sum, $4.5 million will fund advances to homeowners who require assistance to insulate and provide clean heat to their homes, $0.6 million to fund advances to homeowners who want to establish solar water heating in their homes; $1.7 million for public good capital projects; $0.6 million for Operations Group and Wairoa office extensions; and $0.7 million for computer system integration.  These amounts include $2.3 million of loans included in the 2013-14 Annual Plan that were not drawn down and have been carried forward to the 2014-15 year.

The Annual Plan estimate is that at 30 June 2015 external loans outstanding will be $24.9 million.  An analysis of these loans is shown in the chart below.

 

Additional liability related to funding of HBRC investments

The cash flows for a period of 50 years ending 30 June 2063 generated from the portfolio of Napier leasehold properties (after the free-holding initiative to lessees) were sold to secure a lump sum payment from the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) of $37 million which was included in the financial assets to be used to fund investment activity.

 

·   


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

Rates Comparison

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

 

Comparison of Rural Rates in Three Districts

Comparison of Rural Rates on Specific Properties in Three Districts

Description of rates

Rating Basis

Central Hawke’s Bay

Hastings

Wairoa

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

Details for comparison

Capital Value ($)

CV

2,025,000

2,025,000

2,889,000

2,890,000

470,000

470,000

Land Value ($)

LV

1,570,000

1,570,000

2,305,000

2,310.000

370,000

370,000

Area (Hectares)

Area

276.3567

276.3567

610.8591

610.8591

32.9742

32.9742

Rates ($)

General Rate

LV

119.95

137.69

163.66

193.81

28.30

31.38

UAGC Fixed Amount

Fixed

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

General Funded Rates ($)

145.49

166.10

189.20

222.22

53.84

59.79

HPFCS F2 Indirect

CV

78.29

82.36

 

Central Stream/Drains

CV

19.01

18.32

24.55

25.40

Plant Pest

Area

121.23

126.07

267.98

278.67

14.47

15.04

Animal Pest Rate

Area

399.22

413.90

882.45

914.88

47.63

49.39

Bovine TB

Area

158.40

163.96

350.14

362.42

18.90

19.56

Wairoa River

CV

46.63

48.93

Upper Tukituki River

LV

97.61

102.52

Economic Development

Fixed

16.64

17.53

16.64

17.53

13.00

14.00

Emergency Management

Fixed

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

Targeted Rate ($)

826.74

857.14

1634.68

1696.10

155.26

161.76

Total Rates ($)

972.23

1023.24

1823.88

1918.32

209.10

221.55

Dollar Increase

 

51.01

 

94.44

 

12.45

Percentage Increase

 

5.25%

 

5.18%

 

5.95%

 


 

Comparison of Rates on Specific Urban Properties

Comparison of Rates on Specific Urban Properties

Description of rates

Rating Basis

Napier Hill

Napier South

Flaxmere

Havelock North

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

Details for comparison

Capital Value ($)

CV

680,000

680,000

225,000

225,000

175,000

170,000

660,000

660,000

Land Value ($)

LV

220,000

220,000

147,000

147,000

67,000

64,000

255,000

255,000

Area (Hectares)

Area

0.0745

0.0745

0.0668

0.0668

0.0607

0.0607

0.0777

0.0777

General Rate

LV

15.73

18.15

10.51

12.13

4.76

5.37

18.11

21.39

UAGC Fixed Amount

Fixed

25.54

28.41

 

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

General Funded Rates ($)

41.27

46.56

36.05

40.54

30.30

33.78

43.65

49.80

HPFCS F1Direct

CV

24.38

26.17

19.36

19.87

HPFCS F2 Indirect

CV

18.90

19.31

5.98

6.39

4.74

4.85

17.90

18.81

HPFCS Drainage

LV

39.20

41.17

23.21

23.46

Public Transport

LV

57.31

57.90

38.29

38.69

17.33

17.14

66.97

68.28

Central Stream/Drains

CV

5.92

5.95

1.87

1.97

1.49

1.49

5.61

5.80

Karamu Maintenance

Fixed

10.00

10.55

Karamu Enhancement

Fixed

9.39

9.86

Clean Heat/Healthy Homes

LV

19.51

18.90

13.04

12.63

5.79

5.59

22.02

22.28

Economic Development

Fixed

16.64

17.53

16.64

17.53

16.64

17.53

16.64

17.53

Emergency Management

Fixed

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

Targeted Rates ($)

132.91

134.43

154.03

159.39

103.19

104.77

163.16

167.95

Total Rates ($)

174.18

180.99

190.08

199.93

133.49

138.55

206.81

217.75

Dollar Increase

6.81

9.85

5.06

10.94

Percentage Increase 1

3.91%

5.18%

3.79%

5.29%

 


 

Comparison of Rates on Specific Urban Properties

Comparison of Rates on Specific Urban Properties

Description of rates

Rating Basis

Taradale

Hastings

Wairoa

Central HB

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

Details for comparison

Capital Value ($)

CV

415,000

415,000

390,000

390,000

230,000

230,000

300,000

300,000

Land Value ($)

LV

220,000

220,000

160,000

160,000

63,000

63,000

120,000

120,000

Area (Hectares)

Area

0.1105

0.1105

0.1012

0.1012

0.1213

0.1213

0.1495

0.1495

General Rate

LV

15.75

18.15

11.36

13.42

4.83

5.34

9.18

10.52

UAGC Fixed Amount

Fixed

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

General Funded Rates ($)

41.29

46.56

36.90

41.83

30.37

33.75

34.72

38.93

HPFCS F1Direct

CV

47.06

48.26

43.13

45.59

HPFCS F2 Indirect

CV

11.54

11.79

10.56

11.11

HPFCS Drainage

LV

59.45

58.57

Public Transport

LV

57.31

57.90

41.39

42.84

Central Stream/Drains

CV

3.61

3.63

3.31

3.42

2.67

2.72

Wairoa Rivers/Streams

CV

22.77

23.94

U.T.T.F.C.S.

LV

7.45

7.83

Clean Heat/Healthy Homes

LV

19.14

18.90

13.82

13.98

Economic Development

Fixed

16.64

17.53

16.64

17.53

13.00

14.00

16.64

17.53

Emergency Management

Fixed

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

Targeted Rates ($)

169.93

172.85

202.93

207.88

50.40

52.78

41.39

42.92

Total Rates ($)

211.22

219.41

239.83

249.71

80.77

86.53

76.11

81.85

Dollar Increase

8.19

9.88

5.76

5.74

Percentage Increase 1

3.88%

4.12%

7.13%

7.54%


Comparison of Rates on Specific Commercial Properties

Comparison of Rates on Specific Commercial Properties

Description of rates

Rating Basis

Napier Hotel

Emerson St Napier

Hastings Shops

Hastings Motel

Waipukurau Office

Wairoa Shops

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

2013-14

2014-15

Details for Comparison

Capital Value ($)

CV

3,250,000

3,250,000

1,475,000

1,475,000

1,000,000

970,000

910,000

910,000

205,000

205,000

255,000

255,000

Land Value ($)

LV

1,875,000

1,875,000

420,000

420,000

385,000

385,000

670,000

670,000

40,000

40,000

50,000

50,000

Area (Hectares)

Area

0.3025

0.3025

0.0506

0.0506

0.1097

0.1097

0.3254

0.3254

0.0717

0.0717

0.2022

0.2022

General Rate

LV

134.06

154.69

30.03

34.65

27.33

32.30

47.57

56.21

3.06

3.51

3.82

4.24

UAGC Fixed Amount

Fixed

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

25.54

28.41

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Funded Rates

159.60

183.10

55.57

63.06

52.87

60.71

73.11

84.62

28.60

31.92

29.36

32.65

HPFCS F1Direct

CV

167.27

171.54

110.60

113.39

100.65

106.38

 

HPFCS F2 Indirect

CV

90.35

92.30

41.00

41.89

27.10

27.65

24.66

25.94

 

 

HPFCS Drainage

LV

133.36

141.10

232.09

245.55

 

Public Transport

LV

488.44

493.50

109.41

110.54

99.60

103.10

173.33

179.43

 

 

Central Stream/Drains

CV

27.63

28.44

12.84

12.90

8.50

8.53

7.74

8.00

1.80

1.86

 

Clean Heat/Healthy Homes

LV

166.31

161.06

36.54

36.07

33.26

33.64

57.89

58.56

 

 

Economic Development

CV

411.77

425.10

186.88

192.93

125.90

127.55

114.57

119.67

27.76

27.74

41.72

40.60

Upper Tukituki Scheme

LV

 

 

 

2.48

2.61

 

Wairoa River Scheme

CV

25.25

26.55

Emergency Management

Fixed

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

14.63

14.84

Targeted Rates ($)

1199.13

1215.24

568.57

580.71

552.95

569.80

725.56

758.37

46.67

47.05

81.60

81.99

Total Rates ($)

1358.73

1398.34

624.14

643.77

605.82

630.51

798.67

842.99

75.27

78.97

110.96

114.64

Dollar Increase

 

39.61

 

19.63

24.69

44.32

3.70

3.68

Percentage Increase 2

 

2.92%

 

3.15%

 

4.08%

5.55%

4.92%

3.32%

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

 


Financial Comparatives between Year 3 of the Long Term Plan (LTP) 2012-22 and Annual Plan 2014-15

Explanatory Notes of Changes between Year 3 of the LTP 2012-22 and Annual Plan 2014-15

Significant variations between the 2012-22 LTP and the 2014-15 Annual Plan are outlined below.

Prospective Comprehensive Income Statement (Part 3, Pg 16)

Revenue from activities (Note 1, Part 3, Pg 20)

The LTP assumed that the Bovine TB Regional Vector Control Programmes for the Animal Health Board (AHB) would continue to be delivered by HBRC Biosecurity staff undertaking the work. Subsequent to the compilation of the LTP a decision was made by the AHB that they would assume responsibility for running the Bovine TB Regional Vector Control Programmes from 1 July 2013.  Accordingly the costs associated with this programme have been reduced from Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) expenditure along with the revenue received from the AHB in relation to this service.

Revenue from rates (Note 2, Part 3, Pg 21)

Overall, rates (excluding GST) proposed for the first 3 years of the LTP, up to 30 June 2015 are $15,665,000 against $15,563,000 proposed in the LTP.  This is an increase of 0.66% from the LTP rating level.  This includes the increases in targeted rates for the Makara and Opoho schemes:

·      Makara Scheme: In May 2012 it was identified that there was a sinkhole in the dam protecting the Makara Valley. In order to reinstate the level of protection provided by the dam it was proposed to repair the dam at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. This was to be funded through use of the HBRC’s regional disaster reserve, scheme disaster reserves, scheme depreciation reserves and an external loan of $220,000.  In order to fund this external loan and increased maintenance a rate increase of approximately $52,000 was proposed for the 2013-14 year. This has been continued in the 2014-15 year with the effect of increasing the targeted rates for this scheme from $32,416 in the LTP to $86,237.

·      Opoho Scheme: Its management had previously been administered through direct billing for actual work.  To give certainty of the amount to be charged to the land owners it is proposed to introduce a flood and drainage scheme into the targeted rate programme in the 2014-15 Annual Plan.  This has the effect of increasing the targeted rates by $18,328.  This scheme affects three landowners. (refer to Amendments to Long Term Plan (LTP) 2012-22, Part 1, Pg 19).

Revenue from grants (Part 3, Pg 16)

Grants income is forecast to be $494,000 less in the Annual Plan than in the LTP.  The major change is in the calculation of funding from the New Zealand Transport Association (NZTA) for the Regional Land Transport Strategy projects.

Other revenue (Note 3, Part 3, Pg 21)

There are a number of revenue streams under “Other Revenue”.  The movements in each are shown below.

Dividends (+$963,000)

The LTP forecast to receive $6.6 million in dividends from the Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Limited (HBRIC Ltd) for the 2014-15 year.  This dividend level has been increased to $7.56 million as a result of discussions between HBRIC and its major subsidiary, Napier Port.  This revised level includes $700,000 to part fund the cost of capital proposed for the RWS.

 

 

 

Interest (-$3,213,000)

Interest Rate Changes

The economic data available to HBRC when compiling the LTP indicated that the Official Cash Rate (OCR) would increase to 4.5% by June 2015.  This justified an interest rate of 5.75% on HBRC deposits to be used for the 2014-15 financial year.

Current economic data shows that the OCR remained at 2.5% and is only estimated to increase to 3.5% by June 2015.  Therefore the interest rate for the 2014-15 year has been revised to the lower level of 5.1%. 

At the commencement of the 2014-15 Annual Plan year HBRC will still have a high level of cash deposits on hand for investment ($70 million) and will also have deposits representing special purpose reserves ($18 million).  The effect of the adjustment on interest rates results in approximately $580,000 in reduced interest income.

Returns on Investment

For the 2014-15 year the LTP 2012-22, estimated returns on funds invested at:

·      Ruataniwha Water Scheme (RWS) ($638,000);

·      Ngaruroro Water Scheme (NWS) ($352,000);

·      Whakatu Road/ Rail Hub ($1,727,000);

·      Forestry Investments ($812,000).

The proposed Annual Plan 2014/14 shows the following adjustments:

·      RWS – HBRC has resolved to not require a return on funds invested during the feasibility stage.  This plan does show a payment from HBRIC for RWS funding costs and this is by way of dividends.

·      NWS – the implementation of this scheme has been deferred while feasibility studies are prepared.

 

 

 

·      Whakatu Road/Rail Hub – this scheme has been discarded because its major backers, the Napier Port has decided not to go ahead and therefore HBRC will not be asked to contribute.

·      HBRC has a number of forestry investments including forests at Central Hawke’s Bay, Mahia, Waihapua and Tutira.  The LTP assumed a return of 7.5% on HBRC’s investment in these forests.  As HBRC’s cost to funds has decreased due to decreasing interest rates, the return on forests has been revised to 5%, a reduction of $130,000 from the LTP.

Leasehold rentals (+$266,000)

The LTP provided for the sell down of Napier leasehold properties in order to provide cash for other investments.  This programme exceeded expectations and the LTP sell down estimate of $15 million has increased to a sell down of $27 million. Accordingly, the rental revenue from Napier leaseholds reflects the reduced number of remaining properties and is less than shown in the LTP. 

Offsetting this is that the LTP proposed the sale of the Wellington leasehold properties.  These funds have not been required and so the rental from these properties has continued.

Forestry income (-$211,000)

Hill Country Afforestation - the proposal in the LTP to fund the establishment of forestry blocks on erodible hill country land assumed a carbon price of $20 per tonne to justify a viable business.  As the carbon price at the time of writing this Plan is around $3 per tonne, HBRC resolved not to proceed with the forestry investment on hill country erodible land during 2014-15.

 

 

Subvention payments (+$224,000)

The LTP assumed a number of targeted assistance grants would be paid during the 2012/13 financial year.  There were a number of delays in finalising the projects that requested targeted assistance and most of these grants were paid out during the 2013-14 financial year.  This will result in a substantial increase in the subvention payments during 2014-15.

Napier – Gisborne Railway Returns (+$117,000)

As mentioned in the Chairman and Chief Executive comments, it has been proposed that HBRC invest in the Napier – Gisborne Railway.  An initial investment of $3.9million would be required from HBRC for the 2014-15 year with a return that is reflective of HBRC’s funding costs.

Fair value gains on investments (Note 7, Part 3, Pg 25)

The LTP forecasts $2.5 million of fair value gains on investment property.  However, due to an increase in the sell down of leasehold land the value of the investment portfolio has decreased and therefore the fair value gains have reduced by $715,000 in the 2014-15 Annual Plan.

Expenditure from activities (Note 1, Part 3, Pg 20)

There is a reduction of $396,000 on expenditure in activities. These are mainly due to the following areas:

·      The LTP allowed for HBRC to provide the Bovine TB Vector Control programmes on behalf of the Animal Health Board, however from 1 July 2013 the Animal Health Board will be directly undertaking these programmes.  Expenditure allowed for in the LTP of $620,000 for these programmes are no longer included in the Annual Plan.

·     
Regional income collection expenditure has reduced from the LTP level of $3.4 million to $2.0 million.  This is due to a reduction of $350,000 in the costs associated with Hill Country Afforestation which has been deferred.  A $770,000 reduction in the amount required to pay the Accident Compensation Corporation for the Napier leasehold cash flow sell down due to selling more properties before the deal took place.  A reduction of $300,000 for reduced rate collection costs and disaster insurance premiums.

·      There were substantial unspent expenses of $1,425,000 that were carried forward from 2013-14 to 2014-15 for projects yet to be completed.  These costs have been added to the expenditure on activities.

Finance Costs (Note 1, Part 3, Pg 20)

Included in the LTP finance costs are not only the interest on borrowings, but also the payment/fees associated with the transfer of Napier leasehold cash flows to the Accident Compensation Corporation.  Since the HBRC’s programme of freeholding to lessees has exceeded expectations, the value of remaining cash flows to be sold on was substantially reduced and therefore the payments/fees have also substantially reduced.

Property, plant and equipment (Note 5, Part 3, Pg 24)

Expenditure on property, plant and equipment including intangible assets are proposed to be $2,742,000 more in the Annual Plan than in the LTP.  The major reason for this is that intangible assets include $1,666,000 for the feasibility costs for the NWS project.  In the LTP these costs had been incorporated in the advances to HBRIC Ltd but HBRC is proposing to treat these feasibility costs in the same way as the RWS and keep them as a HBRC project until such time that these are sold to HBRIC Ltd.  Other intangible assets were increased by $180,000 for systems integration projects for regulatory software.

Motor Vehicles and Plant have increased by $219,000 due to $140,000 excavator required by HBRC Works Group and timing on fleet replacements have changed since the LTP.  These have been offset by a $100,000 increase in expected proceeds for disposals. There were also capital expenditure carry forwards from the 2013-14 year of $621,000 for the Operations Group and Wairoa Office improvements and $10,000 for science technical equipment.

Forestry assets (Part 3, Page 16)

Expenditure on forestry assets are proposed to be $3.2 million less in the Annual Plan than in the LTP.  This is because of the postponement of the Hill Country planting project which is no longer viable due to the low carbon credit price. 

Solar and Clean Heat – net lending from reserves (Part 3, Page 16)

The LTP proposed to lend $3.5 million in relation to solar and clean heat advances under the Healthy Homes initiatives.  Due to the continual deferral of the solar scheme and the higher than forecast take up of clean heat grants rather than loans these advances are now proposed to be $2.5 million in the Annual Plan.

Advances to HBRIC Ltd (Part 3, Page 16)

The LTP proposed to advance funds of $33.2 million to HBRIC Ltd in the 2014-15, however the Annual Plan has reduced this by $11.0 million to an advance of $22.2 million. The reasons for this change are:

·      Investment in the RWS – The LTP provided for a $12.0 million advance to HBRIC Ltd for investment in the RWS.  This has now been revised to $22.2 million due to the timing of required funds being earlier than the LTP assumptions.

·      Investment in the NWS – The LTP provided for a $4.2 million advance to HBRIC Ltd for the NWS.  This Plan now assumes that HBRC will perform the feasibility process and $1.7 million has been proposed for this in the Plan.  Therefore the $4.2 million will not be required by HBRIC Ltd in the 2014-15 year.

·      Investment in the Whakatu Road and Rail Hub – The LTP had provided for a $17.0 million advance to HBRIC Ltd for the Whakatu Road and Rail Hub.  Funding is no longer required for this project in the 2014-15 year.

Advances to Napier – Gisborne Railway (Part 3, Page 16)

This is a new proposal and so not included in the LTP.  A projected $3.9 million has been allocated for this venture in the 2014-15 year.

Reserve and public debt funding (Part 3, Page 16)

The Annual Plan shows reserve funding of $9.2 million less than that set out in the LTP.  This refers, for the most part, to reduced advances to HBRIC Ltd, Forestry Assets and Solar Heat.

Public debt funding has increased from $5.3 million in the LTP to $8.2 million in the Annual Plan an increase of $2.9 million.  This is due to $2.3 million carried forward from the 2013-14 year for loans that have yet to be drawn down, an increase in System Integration loans of $0.2 million and an increase in Heat Smart loans of $1.7 million offset by a $1.3 million reduction in funding for Solar Heat.

Changes to prospective cash flows (Part 3, Page 19)

The Prospective Cash Flow Statements show that the overall net change in cash and cash equivalents has decreased from ($33.9) million as estimated in the LTP, to ($26.0) million in the Annual Plan.  This results in a forecast year end (30 June 2015) cash and cash equivalents balance of $52.8 million.  This closing balance represents the cash on hand for operating and investment activities and is a combination of financial assets and cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet.

Net cash flows from operating activities is forecast to be $2.3 million less in the Annual Plan than forecast in the LTP mainly due to the carry forward of expenses for the Te Mata Park Visitor Centre and Wairoa Community Centre which are offset by loan funding as well as lower income (refer to comments on the Prospective Comprehensive Income Statement).

Net cash outflows from investing activities are forecast to increase by $7.2 million due to less capital expenditure on investments and HBRIC advances (refer to comments on Capital Expenditure).

 

Changes to significant forecasting assumptions

The following material changes have been made to the significant forecasting assumptions incorporated in the LTP:

Interest Rates

The interest rate on investment income in the LTP was assumed at 5.75%.  In the 2014-15 Annual Plan the interest rate used for deposits is 5.1% which reflects the changing circumstances in the financial markets which has seen the Official Cash Rate (OCR) remain at lower levels than forecast in the LTP.

Cost Adjustors

The LTP provided for cost adjusters to reflect increases in costs, specifically in external expenditure of 6.5% cumulative for the 2013-14 and 2014-15 years.  In the Annual Plan external expenditure has not been increased by the full amount to reflect the effects of inflation on these costs.

Investments

·      The LTP assumed investment in forestry planting on erodible hill country. However, as the carbon market price has dropped to unworkable levels, HBRC has resolved that this initiative be deferred until there is improvement in the carbon price.

·      The LTP set out continual investment in the NWS, however, HBRC has resolved that its resources needed to be devoted to the RWS and work on the NWS was deferred until the 2014-15 year


Insurance of infrastructure assets

·      HBRC resolved in January 2013 to rescind the notice of intention to withdraw from the Local Authority Protection Programme (LAPP). Therefore LAPP will continue to cover 40% of the damage caused by natural disasters to infrastructure assets.

·      HBRC holds funds in a Regional Disaster Reserve which had a balance of $3.3m at 28 February 2014. The LTP assumed that this reserve would not be drawn on during the 10 year LTP period. However, HBRC resolved to contribute $768,370 from this fund to assist in the remediation works required in the Makara Flood and Drainage scheme which will be completed before the end of the 2013-14 financial year.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

Amendments to Long Term Plan (LTP) 2012-22

There is one amendment proposed to the LTP 2012-22.

Revenue and financing policies

Section 102 of the Local Government Act 2002 (funding and financial policies) states that all policies in that section and included in a Council’s LTP can only be changed as an amendment to any LTP. The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council proposes an amendment to our previously adopted Revenue and Financing policy of the LTP 2012-22.

As adopted in the LTP 2012-22

 

 

Allocation of Expenditure

Funding Tools

Public

Private

Public

Private

Other Schemes

Opoho

 -

-

-

-

 

As proposed in the Annual Plan 2014-15

 

 

Allocation of Expenditure

Funding Tools

Public

Private

Public

Private

Other Schemes

Opoho

10%

90%

Investment Income

Differential Rate

 


 

Explanation of changes

The Revenue and Financing Policy is proposed to be amended in respect of the funding mechanisms for a new Opoho flood and drainage scheme under the “Other Schemes” sub activity within the Land Drainage and River Control activity group.

The new Opoho scheme is proposed to have a targeted rate for 2014-15 of $18,328 which funds 90% of the expenses in this scheme.  The other 10% is proposed to be funded through investment income. 

Historically the three rate payers that make up this scheme were billed directly for any flood and drainage work that was completed by HBRC.  To provide these rate payers with more certainty around the amount that would be charged it is proposed to introduce a new flood and drainage scheme with a targeted rate attached in the 2014-15 Annual Plan.

Funding Tools

The funding tools have changed from 100% private funding through fees/charges to 90% private funding through a targeted rate and 10% public funding through investment income representing the portion of public good gained from the work.

Audit Requirement

Section 103 of the Local Government Act 2002 (revenue and financing policy) states that if a local authority amends its revenue and financing policy thereafter only significant amendments are required to be audited.  Given the small number of rate payers and the relatively small amount involved audit is not required.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

Non financial changes from the LTP

This section highlights the significant issues identified in the Long-Term Plan 2012-22.  There are no proposed additions to the list of issues in the 2014-15 Annual Plan. These issues are derived from the Strategic Plan (2011).  HBRC is focusing on and developing these key strategic approaches in order to achieve the strategic goals of Resilient Ecosystems, Resilient Economy and Resilient Communities.

 


Strategic Goals

Strategic goal

Resilient Ecosystems

Resilient Economy

Resilient Communities

Focus Areas

Land

Water Quality

Water Allocation

Water security

Natural Hazards and infrastructure

People and Communities

Strategic Outcome

Viable and resilient farming systems are being achieved through sustainable land use

There is proactive integrated management of land and water.

Water supply and ecosystem needs are optimised for sustainable growth.

Water supply and demand for sustainable growth are optimised.

People and businesses feel safe and are willing to invest in Hawke’s Bay.

Comprehensive, relevant and quality services continue to be delivered by HBRC to enable a connected and healthy community.

Strategic Implementation

-   Hill Country Afforestation Proposal

-   Improving the Focus of the Regional Landcare Scheme

-   Biodiversity Strategy

-   Papanui Catchment Pilot Study

-   Water User Groups

­ Ruataniwha Water Storage

­ Ngaruroro Water Storage

­ Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme: Level of Service

­ Regional Economic Development Strategy

­ Port of Napier Investment

­  Heat Smart Programme

­  Public Transport

­  GMO-Free Hawke’s Bay

­  Civil Defence & Emergency Management: Funding and Targeted Rates

­  Webcasting of Council and Committee Meetings

­  Solar Hot Water Scheme

­  Hydraulic Fracturing

Enabling the Strategic Goals

Enablers

Statutory Planning

Investment

Strategic Alliances

Fit for Purpose Organisation

Strategic Outcomes

Policies and plans are ahead of trends

Investment is enabling the regional economy to prosper sustainably.

Mutual relationships over the long term help achieve the sustainable development of Hawke’s Bay

HBRC is a responsive organisation that meets changing needs.

Strategic Implementation

-  Catchment Based Plan Changes

-  Regional Natural Hazards Plan

­ Investment Strategy

­ Realisation of value from HBRC Investments in leasehold properties in Napier and Wellington

-    Strategic Alliances

-    Research Alliances

-    Transfer of Tutira Properties

-    Regional Community Facilities Projects: Grants

­ Organisational Efficiency

­ Shared services


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 1 Introduction

Attachment 2

 

 

Fenton Wilson, Wairoa - Chairman

Fenton has represented the Wairoa constituency since 2009.  He is Chairman of the Wairoa Community Development Trust and also serves on the Smedley Station Advisory Board.

141 Maromauku Road, Wairoa 4196  |  06 835 9200
027 4984 483  |  chairman@hbrc.govt.nz

Alan Dick, QSO, Napier

Alan represents the Napier constituency, having been elected to Council in 2004. Alan has a Business Degree (MBA) and is a Fellow of the New Zealand Institute of Management.

3 Newbury Place, Taradale 4112 |  06 844 4645
027 224 0012  |  alizdick@xtra.co.nz

 

Dave Pipe, Napier

Dave is a newly elected Councillor with a background in community involvement, having served five terms on Napier City Council. Dave was also on the HB Environmental Awards Committee for ten years, five as its Chair. He is a former trustee of Pukemokimoki Marae Trust and is founding Chair of Napier Community House Trust, the Manager/Coordinator for St Mary’s Parish Taradale, and a qualified Independent Civil Celebrant.


25 Vigor Brown Street, Napier 4110  |  06 835 3380
027 247 9979  |  davepipe2012@gmail.com

Christine Scott, Napier - Deputy Chairman

Christine has represented the Napier constituency since 2001. Christine has served on a number of community trusts and chaired the Waiapu Diocesan Finance advisory group. She is currently a director of Anglican Care (Waiapu) Ltd.

43 Napier Terrace, Napier 4110  |  06 835 6950 
0274 469 367  |  chscott@inspire.net.nz


Peter Beaven, Ngaruroro

Peter Beaven is a newly elected Councillor who, for the past twenty years, has worked in various roles in horticulture. Peter graduated from Victoria University with LLB(Hons), is on the Board of Pipfruit NZ and current Chairman of the World Apple and Pears Association.

35A McHardy Street, Havelock North 4130
06 877 7823  |  027 2355 322  |  pjbeaven@icloud.com

Debbie Hewitt, Central Hawke’s Bay

Waipukurau based, Debbie is a newly elected representative. Debbie has a Masters degree in Agribusiness Management  and previous governance roles include three terms as grower-elected director of Horticulture New Zealand; chair of the Horticulture Industry Vision 10/2020 Taskforce; chair of the Ruataniwha Water Storage Stakeholder group; and director of Infracon Ltd.


227 Porangahau Road, Waipukurau 4200  |  06 858 7265    027 405 2882  |  debbiehewitt@xtra.co.nz

Rex Graham, Hastings

Rex is a newly elected Councillor, a Company Director involved in horticulture management and investments in New Zealand and China. Rex is chairman of the U-Turn Charitable Trust, Deputy Chair of the HB Regional Sports Park Trust, a Trustee of Te Aranga Marae and a Director of Te Aranga Ltd.

232 St Georges Road North, Hastings 4172 |  06 877 4122 
021 424 972   |  rex@freshnz.co.nz

Rick Barker, Hastings

Rick was elected in October 2013. He was previously a Member of Parliament for 18 years and is currently acting on behalf of the Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations as a Chief Crown Negotiator for two settlements in Taranaki. Rick completed a Masters Degree in Public Policy in 2012.

409 Burnett Street, Hastings 4156  |  06 878 0010
027 444 2555  |  rickjbarker@gmail.com

Tom Belford, Hastings

Tom is a newly elected representative. His professional expertise is in marketing and communications and he is editor and publisher of BayBuzz magazine. Tom is a co-founder of Transparent Hawke’s Bay and A Better Hawke’s Bay.  He has served on various groups advising our local councils on water and economic development matters. He holds a master’s degree in political philosophy from Georgetown University.

40 Raratu Road, Havelock North 4295  |  06 874 7937
027 3070 315  |  tom@baybuzz.co.nz

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

 

 

Contents

                                                                                                                                          Page

Introduction......................................................................................... 1

Strategic Planning................................................................................. 2

Land Drainage and River Control........................................................... 9

Regional Resources............................................................................. 17

Regulation.......................................................................................... 31

Biosecurity.......................................................................................... 37

Emergency Management.................................................................... 42

Transport............................................................................................ 51

Governance and Community Engagement........................................... 57

 


 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

This plan outlines activities the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) intends to carry out over the next year. The following groups of activities work toward meeting the current and future needs of communities for good quality local infrastructure, local public services, and performance of regulatory functions in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses in the region.

The Structure of the Annual Plan

For the purpose of this Annual Plan, HBRC has arranged its activities into eight groups:

·      Strategic Planning

·      Land Drainage and River Control

·      Regional Resources

·      Regulation

·      Biosecurity

·      Emergency Management

·      Transport

·      Governance and Community Engagement.

 

The section on each of the eight core groups provides:

·      An Introduction

·      How the activity contributes to meeting Council’s objectives

·      Any Significant Negative Impacts arising from its implementation

·      Estimated expenses for each activity and how it will be funded. It is important to note that funding sources and the reason it was selected, is covered in detail in the Long Term Plan 2012-22.

 

 

·      An analysis of the forecast expenditure and income for the 2014-15 Annual Plan and for the same year in the Long Term Plan 2012-22 (LTP). The 2013-14 Annual Plan budgets and actual figures for 2012-13 are also provided for comparative purposes.

Sub-groups within each group provide:

·      The rationale for HBRC involvement and the level of service that it expects deliver to the community

·      Current performance and Performance targets for the year

 

Lower tukituki - Hastings Tourism Image

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

These activities pull together Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) strategic thinking initiatives, economic development, investments and resource management policy development. Together with State of the Environment reports, these provide information for further planning decisions.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

Strategic Planning initiatives and projects are undertaken in order to meet the needs of the regional community for good quality performance of regulatory functions. They help focus conversations on what the future might look like in order to ensure that any regulatory response contributes toward the achievement of this future.

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations –HBRC is managing the region’s natural and physical resources to ensure they are used efficiently and effectively; and the State of the Environment (SOE) project will inform the community of environmental change and the effectiveness of HBRC programmes.

·      A strong prosperous and thriving economy – by funding and undertaking activities which support economic development based on the region’s natural resources; maximising the sustainable input of natural and physical resources into economic activities; and enabling sustainable development through environmental information that can be used to report on activity effects.

·      Strong regional leadership and sense of belonging – by providing a mechanism to co-ordinate regional initiatives through the Regional Economic Development Strategy and Strategic Plan; engaging the community in making decisions about the future of their region, and promoting integrated strategy and planning processes.

 

 

 

·      Communities that value and promote their unique culture and heritage - by helping inform communities of future issues and on the current state of the region.

·      Supportive, caring and inclusive communities - by providing the community with information that enables informed decisions to be made.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by providing a planning framework to promote the sustainable management of the region’s natural and physical resources; and by providing the community with information that enables informed decisions to be made (e.g. the contaminated sites database).

·      Safe and accessible recreational facilities – by providing information to enable safe recreational activities, e.g. recreational water quality programme.

Significant Negative Impacts

HBRC’s involvement in strategic thinking and planning helps to ensure that inevitable change in our communities is positive and not merely random or reactive. Strategic Planning often involves striking a balance between competing interests to ensure that the natural and physical resources we have now are maintained and enhanced for our grandchildren and their grandchildren. Some planning decisions must be made under the Resource Management Act [RMA], and to create and implement those RMA plans can be lengthy and involve significant costs.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Strategic Planning

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Economic Development

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1 – Economic Development

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

Regional Economic Development Strategy mission statement: “To make Hawke’s Bay the best location in which to visit, work, invest, live and grow”

 

Comprehensive visitor strategy in place within an overall regional marketing plan

­ 3 year funding agreement in place for Hawke’s Bay Tourism Ltd with approved performance targets and reporting requirements

2014-2015

­ Continue quarterly reporting to Council on key performance indicators

 

­ Maintain funding of Hawke’s Bay Tourism Ltd for 2014-15 and review as part of 2015-25 Long Term Plan

Long term Regional Economic Development Strategy

­ Last reviewed 2010-11

 

2014-2015

­ Annually review and progress the regional economic development strategy

 

 

­ Review and refresh annually the Regional Economic Development Strategy, and participate fully in Business Hawke’s Bay operations

Investment for research and development and business development

 

­ In 2011-12 a total of $2.7 million of grants came into the region via Ministry of Science and Innovation

­ Underway in partnership with Ministry of Science and Innovation (Regional Partner Network)

2014-15

­ At least $800,000 per annum achieved for Research and Development investment

 

­ Implement Regional Business Partner Network programme in partnership with Chamber of Commerce locally, New Zealand Trade and Enterprise and Ministry of Science and Innovation nationally

Sustainable regional growth

­ Key strategies and actions contained in Regional Economic Development Strategy

2014-15

Initiate sustainable primary production programmes:

·    Maori Agribusiness

·    Wairoa primary sector opportunities

 

Continue to engage on Oil and Gas exploration / development with stakeholders

 

­ Develop and implement collaborative programmes

 



 

Activity 2 – Strategy and Planning

­

­    At all times there is a regional plan in force for the HB coastal marine area

­    New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement (NZCPS) put into action in accordance with statutory requirements

 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2 –Strategy and Planning

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will help the community prepare for the future

 

Number of Embracing Futures Thinking events held

Embracing Futures Thinking Breakfasts held over last three years

Each year

­ Host at least 1 Embracing Futures Thinking (Strategic Planning) event as part of Long Term Plan development

 

­ Project manage event

Trends review completed

Social, technological, Economic, Environmental and political trend report completed in 2009 and summarised in HB2050: Land River Us report

2014-15

­ Refresh the Trends and Environmental Scan analysis

 

­ Engage consultants to undertake trend and environmental scans

Agreement reached on Spatial Planning Framework

Individual strategies are in place that would support spatial planning e.g. Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy, Regional Land Transport Strategy

2014-15

­ Reach agreement on regional and lower North Island spatial planning framework (On hold pending outcome of Local Government reorganisation processes under way in Hawke’s Bay and Wellington)

 

­ Engage with Lower North Island Regional Councils and other agencies such as New Zealand Transport Agency (on hold)

HBRC will integrate land and water and biodiversity management to deliver environmental, economic, social and cultural outcomes

Action plans and monitoring prepared for:

-     Land and Water Management Strategy

-     National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

To date, two Land and Water symposiums have been held

Each year

Prepare report on implementation of National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

 

Stocktake of Land and Water Management Strategy undertaken in March 2014, consider as part of Long Term Plan development

 

­ Report on NPSFM implementation Plan progress through the Annual Report

 

Regional Biodiversity Strategy completed

 

No current biodiversity strategy in place

2014-15:  Prepare final Regional Biodiversity Strategy and prepare programme of work relevant to HBRC for inclusion in the next Long Term Plan

­ Project manage the preparation of a Regional Biodiversity Strategy in conjunction with key stakeholders

HBRC will establish and maintain clear and appropriate policy in a responsive and timely manner that will enable sustainable management of the region’s natural and physical resources

­    Status of Resource Management Plans and Policy Statements.

­    No more than 2 years elapse from notification of a plan change to decisions on submissions being issued

 

Plan changes in process

­ RPS Change 5: Land and Freshwater Management

­ Plan Change 6: Tukituki Catchment

 

 

Policy under development in following catchments

­    Taharua and Mohaka

­    Heretaunga Zone (Clive/Karamu, Ngaruroro, Tutaekuri, Ahuriri, Heretaunga Plains aquifer)

2014-15

Appeals on Change 5 (Land and Freshwater Management) are resolved

Plan change for Taharua /Upper Mohaka catchment publicly notified Dec 2014

Initiate community engagement on oil and gas exploration policy development

2015-16

Plan change for outstanding freshwater bodies publicly notified July 2016

2016-17

Plan change for Heretaunga Zone publicly notified December 2016

 

 

­ Project manage the development of policy for inclusion in the Regional Resource Management Plan and Regional Policy Statement including:

·    Coordinate and integrate all the necessary inputs into the planning processes

·    Coordinate and undertake the required stakeholder community engagement before notification

Regional Natural Hazards Strategy and Implementation Plan prepared

2014-15

Plan change for Natural Hazards publicly notified July 2015

Regional Coastal Environment Plan

Plan Change 1- Geographical Coverage of Regional Resource Management Plan:

­ Appeals resolved, awaiting Minister of Conservation approval

 

2014-15

­ Start review of coastal hazard zones for coastline between Tangoio and Clifton, as part of preparation of a hazard management strategy for that coastline (see Project 322)

-  Develop plan change(s) to give effect to 2010 NZCPS

­ Project manage the development of policy in the Regional Coastal Environment Plan that gives effect to the 2010 NZCPS including:

·    Coordinate and integrate the necessary expert and legal advice inputs into planning processes

·    Coordinate and undertake the required stakeholder community engagement prior to notification


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 3 – Policy Implementation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3 –Policy Implementation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will promote integrated management and benefits of collaboration by proactively communicating its policies and responsibilities through dialogue and submissions on district plans, consent applications and central government initiatives

 

Lodging of submissions on district plans, district planning applications and central government initiatives where there are relevant regional council policies

A report on statutory advocacy activities:

­ Prepared and considered at HBRC’s Environmental Management Committee meetings and Maori Committee meetings

 

2012-22

­ Submissions made on district plans, district planning applications and central government initiatives reported to HBRC’s Environment and Services Committee

­ Staff of HBRC and territorial local authorities to meet at least twice a year to discuss integration issues and steps to improve the regional and district plan are identified and acted upon

 

­ Continue to receive, review and report on consent applications and plan development activities

­ Facilitate the Hawke’s Bay Planners’ group

HBRC will help communities without sewers improve the management of domestic wastewater

Number of interest free loans approved

 

­ One loan provided to Hastings District Council for the Waipatiki system has been repaid in full

 

­ Provide a fund to help the territorial authority-led upgrading of community wastewater systems in communities without sewers ($200,000pa contributions capped at $1,000,000)

­ Non-regulatory initiatives developed and implemented to complement regional plan policy development that implements National Policy Statements and/or National Environmental Standards

­ Continue to provide an interest-free loan scheme to assist territorial authorities’ upgrade wastewater services in communities without sewers

­ Continue to consider a broad range of interventions to achieve the objectives of nationally driven regulations and standards

HBRC will investigate and manage contaminated sites to ensure public health and safety and environmental protection

 

Maintain a database of potentially and confirmed contaminated sites

 

­ Upgrading of database to enable both public and territorial authority access

2012-22

­ To administer and maintain the database, including checking record details, site visits to GPS areas of contamination, transfers to Territorial Local Authorities (TLAs) as per agreed protocol and advising landowners of the contaminated sites status of their property

 

­ Review database

­ Verification of sites listed on database

­ Transfer protocols with TLAs



HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 4 – State of the Environment Reporting

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4 –State of the Environment Reporting

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve Performance Targets

HBRC will monitor and provide accurate information to the community so that it understands the State of the Environment (SOE) for Hawke’s Bay

Data quality as assessed against HBRC’s quality assurance system

 

Amount of State of the Environment monitoring data available through HBRC’s website

HBRC’s quality assurance system is based on nationally recognised standards and guidelines.  The Quality Management System that guides activities in the Environmental Science Sections was accredited in December 2012 in terms of ISO9001:2008

Some data for limited sites is available on HBRC’s website:

·      Recreational water quality

·      Groundwater quality

·      Groundwater levels

·      River flows

·      Rainfall

·      Air quality

 

2012-22

­ Maintain the current level of SOE data on HBRC’s website

­ Continue to make information from the following monitoring sites available through HBRC’s website:

·    All telemetered river flow sites

·    All telemetered rainfall sites

·    All telemetered climate stations

·    All data collected, processed, analysed and stored in accordance with ISO requirements

·    Maintain ISO accreditation

 

 

Maintain quality assurance system requirements to maintain ISO accreditation

Regular auditing of the quality assurance system

Take corrective action as identified by internal and external audits

Respond to “Areas of concern” and “Opportunities for improvement” identified by internal and external audits

Maintain monthly SoE reports on website

 

State of the Environment Monitoring Report

Five Yearly State of the Environment Report June 2009

2012-22

Annual Update State of the Environment Reports available by June each year

2014-15

Five yearly State of the Environment Monitoring Report available by December 2014

 

 

Prepare annual update and five yearly reports

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Land drainage and river control activities focus on the management of the region’s rivers, streams and drainage network to reduce the effects of flooding in areas where there is significant risk to people and property. Much of this work relates to the maintenance of the flood control and drainage schemes which have been developed over many years, and now have a replacement value of more than $140 million.

Land drainage and river control covers the inter-related programmes of:

·      Flood protection and drainage schemes

·      Investigations and enquiries

·      Sundry works.

The empowering legislation for this function of HBRC is the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the Local Government Act 2002 and the Civil Defence Emergency Act 2002.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objective to meet the current and future needs of communities for good quality local infrastructure in a way that is most cost-effective for households and businesses in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by management and enhancement of the waterways with an holistic management philosophy and implementation of an environmental strategy and compliance with an environmental code of practice.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by reducing the risk of flooding to the community and productive land.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by minimising the risk of flooding of homes and productive land, and providing safe waterway environments.

 

 

 

·      Safe and accessible recreational facilities – by providing for public access to HBRC managed waterway environments for recreation and enjoyment and enhancing amenity values where appropriate.

Significant Negative Impacts

The construction of flood protection and drainage systems has resulted in significant changes to the natural hydrology of their associated catchments, including a reduction in areas frequently flooded, diversion and straightening of waterway reaches, removal of streamside vegetation, and the use of structures to control flows and erosion.

These changes and the ongoing methods used to maintain the schemes have resulted in adverse effects on river and stream ecology and habitats, as well as affecting the social and cultural values of the waterways. HBRC has initiated an enhancement programme, including alternative management of riparian areas, which will promote improvements in water quality and aquatic and terrestrial habitats in efforts to repair and remediate those negative impacts.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Land Drainage & River Control

 


Activity 1a, b, c – Flood Protection and Drainage Schemes

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1a – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Heretaunga Plains Scheme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control network that provides protection from frequent river flooding to communities and productive land within the Heretaunga Plains Scheme

 

The level of protection in technical terms is to convey a flood discharge with a 1% probability of being exceeded in any one year (1%AEP) safely to the sea

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

Full initial assessments have been made for the following rivers:

­ Tutaekuri    2009-10

­ Ngaruroro   2010-11

­ Lower Tukituki        2011-12

2013-15

­ Review of the current level of service (LOS) provided by the Heretaunga Plains Scheme to determine whether they are still appropriate or should be increased.  Take into account potential impact of climate change in this review.

Ongoing

­ Ongoing maintenance and gravel extraction to maintain the channel capacity and integrity of the flood protection assets

­ Monitoring of flood events in accordance with the Flood Manual

­ Annual asset audit by a chartered professional engineer, and full assessment of each of the major rivers every twelve years

­ Ongoing sawfly damage monitoring and alternative species planting

 

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Kilometres and percentage of floodway that provide the design level of service

 

Audits in past years indicate the following levels of service:

­ Tutaekuri: 100% (23.6km of river channel)

­ Ngaruroro:  100% (39km of river channel)

­ Lower Tukituki: 100%(10.2km of river channel)

2012-22

­ Tutaekuri, Ngaruroro & Lower Tukituki Audits: No change

 

HBRC will maintain an effective drainage network that provides protection from frequent flooding from smaller watercourses to communities and productive land within the Heretaunga Plains Scheme

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of the drainage network within each drainage catchment is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

The historic level of service based on rainfall runoff is no longer considered appropriate given modern design techniques

New measures will be developed as part of the level of service review to be completed over the next three years

2013-14 and 2014-15

­ Review the current level of service provided by the scheme and determine new level of service measures and targets

Ongoing

­ Monitoring, operation and maintenance

­ Annual asset audit by a chartered professional engineer

 

HBRC will protect and enhance the scheme’s riparian land and associated waterways administered by the Regional Council for public enjoyment and increased biodiversity

The level of service will be reported as the length of scheme riparian land enhanced. (Each side of a waterway measured separately and includes new planting and inter-planting)

Completed to date:

­ Tutaekuri (left bank): 6km

­ Tukituki (left bank): 3.4km

                (right bank): 3.4km

­ Ngaruroro (left bank):  4.5 km

Ongoing

­ 0.5km of riparian land enhanced a year (on average)

2013-20

­ Develop Rivers Environmental Concept Plans

Ongoing

Implement annual programme from Environmental Strategy

 


 

 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1b – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Upper Tukituki Scheme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control network that provides protection from frequent river flooding to communities and productive land within the Upper Tukituki Scheme

 

The level of protection in technical terms is to convey a flood discharge with a 1% probability of being exceeded in any one year (1%AEP) safely to the sea

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

Full initial assessments have been made for each of the rivers in the flowing years:

 

­ Upper Tukituki   2009-12

­ Waipawa             2011-12

Full Scheme Reviews

­ Upper Tukituki:  Start Date 2013/14; completion date 2014/15.  Take into account potential impact of climate change in this review.

Routine 2013-22

­ Ongoing maintenance and gravel extraction to maintain the channel capacity and integrity of the flood protection assets

­ Monitoring of flood events in accordance with the Flood Manual

­ Annual asset audit by a chartered professional engineer, and full assessment of each of the major rivers every twelve years

­ Ongoing sawfly damage monitoring

­ Investigate options for increasing gravel extraction from Upper Tukituki Scheme Rivers.

­ Review Scheme classification to determine whether it remains fit for purpose.

 

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Kilometres and percentage of floodway that provide the design level of service

Past audits indicate the following levels of service:

­ Upper Tukituki: 34.4km, 95%

­ Waipawa: 26.5km, 95%

 

2015-16

­ River View Edge Risk: Review of the current level of service provided by the Scheme to determine whether they are still appropriate or should be increased

HBRC will protect and enhance its scheme riparian land and associated waterways for public enjoyment and increased biodiversity

The length of Scheme riparian land enhanced by inter-planting with alternative native and exotic species (each side of a waterway measured separately)

Completed to date:

­ Waipawa (Left Bank): 1.5km

­ Tukituki River (Right Bank): 2km

 

Ongoing

­ 0.5km of riparian land enhanced a year (on average)

 

2013-19

­ Implement annual programme from Environmental Strategy

 


 

 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1c – Flood Protection  & Drainage Schemes: Other Schemes

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will maintain an effective flood control and drainage network that provides protection from frequent flooding to communities and productive land within designated Scheme areas.  These schemes include:

­  Makara Flood Control

­  Paeroa Drainage

­  Porangahau Flood Control

­  Ohuia – Whakaki Drainage

­  Esk River

­  Whirinaki Drainage

­  Maraetotara

­  Te Ngarue

­  Kopuawhara Flood Control

­  Poukawa Drainage

­  Kairakau (proposed)

­  Waimarama (proposed)

 

A full assessment of the capacity and integrity of flood control works is completed every twelve years by a chartered professional engineer with interim audits undertaken annually

 

The level of service will be reported as:

­ Percentage of assets that provide the design level of service

Estimated at 95%

2013-15

­  Kairakau and Waimarama Flood Protection Schemes accepted by community and operation phase begun

­  No change to other schemes

 

Ongoing

­ Ongoing maintenance to preserve channel capacity and integrity of flood protection and drainage assets

­ Monitoring of flood events in accordance with the Flood Manual

 

Consult with Waimarama community regarding the possibility of establishing a flood control scheme to fund improved management of the waterways and flood channels flowing through the community


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 2 – Investigations and Enquiries

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2 –Investigations and Enquiries

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will be available to provide expert advice on drainage, flooding, and coastal erosion issues

 

All queries are dealt with by appropriate qualified and experienced staff

 

­ HBRC employs two chartered professional engineers with experience in flood management, river control and coastal issues

 

Ongoing

­ HBRC retains two chartered professional engineers with experience in flood management, river control and coastal issues on staff

 

Ongoing

­ Staff retention

­ Recruitment of graduates and promotion of local government careers to ensure staffing capacity for the future

 

HBRC will provide up to a 30% subsidy for river control and flood protection where the criteria set out in the Regional Council’s guidelines for technical and financial assistance are met

 

Value of subsidies provided annually

­ Subsidies valued at $42,000

Ongoing

­ $42,000 plus inflation of subsidy money is provided each year at a subsidy rate of 30%

Ongoing

­ Continue to promote the HBRC subsidy programme

HBRC will provide a consultancy service for drainage, flooding, and coastal erosion issues according to individual project agreements on a full cost recovery basis

 

Cost recovery

Satisfaction with Service

­ Costs are recovered

­ Not specifically measured

Ongoing

­ Full costs of any consultation work are recovered

­ Major clients are satisfied with service provided

Ongoing

­ Effectively and efficiently complete consultancy projects


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 3 – Total Sundry Works

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Sundry Works

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will ensure that the beach at Westshore has erosion checked to 1986 erosion line

(The 1986 line was the extent of erosion before beach renourishment began. This line is identified on a series of posts along the foreshore)

 

The comparison of annual beach cross section surveys to the 1986 erosion line

The erosion remains seaward of the 1986 line

Ongoing

­ Erosion does not extend landward of the 1986 line

Ongoing

­ Renourishment is completed annually with the quantity of material assessed from pre-contract beach cross section surveys

HBRC will maintain river mouths so that they do not flood private land above a specified contour subject to suitable river, sea and weather conditions that will allow a safe and successful opening to be made

 

Incidences of flooding of private land above levels as specified in the River Opening Protocol

No incidences

Ongoing

­ Private land above a specified contour is not flooded as a result of a river mouth being closed

Ongoing

­ River mouths and lagoon outlets are inspected regularly and opened when required, and when river, sea and weather conditions allow

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Regional Resources covers the region’s public shared resources (air, water, coast, soil and gravel), its land resource (in private ownership) and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) owned property managed as a regional resource.

These activities include the gathering of information to improve sustainable management and efficient use for enhanced economic and environmental performance.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s community objectives in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generationsby understanding that the region’s natural and physical resources are being managed to ensure they are used efficiently and sustainably; identifying and promoting sustainable land management practices; improving air quality; sustainably managing rivers and the gravel resource; and providing opportunities for access to open space areas.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economyby maximising the sustainable use of natural and physical resources for economic activity, which will make Hawke’s Bay a more attractive place to live, work and establish commercial and industrial enterprises.

·      Communities that value and promote their unique culture and heritage – by protecting sites of cultural significance with open space areas and, where appropriate, identifying and valuing them for public education and interest.

·      Supportive, caring and inclusive communities – by enabling community-led water user groups to develop ways to efficiently use the region’s water allocations, through actions such as audited self management.


·      Safe and accessible recreational facilities –by providing access to the coast and safe off road pathway/cycleway opportunities for recreational enjoyment.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeingby protecting the natural environment particularly fresh and coastal swimming water quality. By improving air quality to reduce respiratory disease and the related cost of health services and lower absenteeism from school and work, caused by exacerbated respiratory symptoms from higher than acceptable levels of PM10 (particulate matter or fine particles in dust and smoke); By providing open space areas and cycleways to encourage good health and wellbeing.

 

Significant Negative Impacts

There are no significant negative impacts relating to the collection of information about regional resources, unless the information raises more questions than answers and results in delays in decision-making.

With sustainable land management, the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) also has a role to meet New Zealand’s Kyoto Protocol obligations. Therefore landowners may be confused by having two agencies engaging with them on the same issues and it is important that HBRC and MPI work together to avoid duplication.

 


 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Regional Resources

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Land Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Land Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

Viable and resilient farming systems are being achieved through sustainable land use

Annually reporting on research project outputs and how they have contributed to sustainable land management outcomes

 

Research and extension projects are currently active including the following:

­ Creating a climate for success – Huatokitoki community project. (MPI, HBRC, Hatuma, Landcorp, Beef and Lamb, Massey, Landcare)

­ Wairoa sediment reduction initiative. (MPI, HBRC)

­ Alternative grassland species (Landcare, MPI, HBRC, Beef and Lamb)

 

Ongoing

­ Continue a programme of research and extension to investigate and field trial issues relevant to sustainable land management in Hawke’s Bay

­ Actively seek collaboration with primary product organisations undertaking research relevant to HB

Ongoing

­ Finalise the development of a research strategy in collaboration with Primary Sector industry groups and commence its implementation

­ Initiate at least one new research or research extension initiative annually

 

Outputs achieved through HBRC Regional Landcare Scheme

Sample of approx outputs from Regional Landcare Scheme since its inception in 1995

­ Total HBRC investment: $7.13M

­ Number of poplar and willow poles planted for soil erosion:   440,000

­ Clients: 744

­ Projects: 2450

Ongoing

­ Regional Landcare Scheme (RLS) reviewed outcomes to be implemented by June 2014

­ Report in the operation plan how RLS activity directly contributes to sustainable land management

­ Annual output targets delivered from the RLS investment to be established and implemented as part of the annual operating plan

Ongoing

­ Utilise RLS funding in accordance with priorities and processes established

 

­ Annual operating plan to be developed and presented to Council before the start of each financial year

The operational plan will show the focus of Regional Landcare Scheme activity and alignment with the Regional Afforestation programme and the intensification of land use

Regional Landcare Scheme subsidies are assessed on the basis of region wide criteria

­ A portion of Regional Landcare Scheme subsidy will be targeted, and the level of subsidy varied, to encourage initiatives that more effectively respond to environmental change

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Land Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will increase its knowledge of the region’s land, soil and terrestrial habitats so it is aware of any current and likely future issues that may arise

This knowledge will allow for a timely and effective response that enables land sustainability for future generations

Regional baseline hill country erosion monitoring

 

Baseline hill country erosion survey

 

2013-14

­ Erosion monitoring repeated (about every 5 years but contingent on any major regional storm event)

 

Erosion/sediment model for the Tukituki catchment to be commissioned with the option of extending into other catchments in the future

 

Integrated catchment management including staged computer modelling & monitoring of the:

­ Mohaka

­ Heretaunga/Ahuriri catchments

­ Tukituki

­ Currently Land and water monitoring of the Taharua and upper Mohaka Rivers

­ Computer modelling of the entire Mohaka catchment is underway

­ Heretaunga/Ahuriri (TANK) catchments are next in line to be investigated

­ Tukituki model (TRIM) developed

 

2013-15

­ Catchment models developed for Taharua and the entire Mohaka catchment

­ Catchment model for TANK catchments developed

­ Refinement and upgrades of Tukituki TRIM model

 

­   Development of TANK catchments model or models

­   Update TRIM into new modelling software

­   Scenarios run using Taharua/Mohaka catchment model

Hawke’s Bay’s land resource is maintained for future generations

­ Area of erosion prone land with tree cover

 

­ Baseline erosion monitoring

Much of Hawke’s Bay’s pastoral hill country needs more vegetative cover to minimise erosion and improve productivity

Proposed Regional Afforestation Scheme was withdrawn by Council due to low carbon price

Investigate potential for High UMF manuka plantings

­ Report on data gathered from high UMF Manuka plantation on Tutira Regional Park

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 2 – Air Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2–Air Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will have adequate knowledge about the level of air pollutants that may impact on public health and aesthetic values so that it can manage air quality for human health needs and aesthetic values

 

State of the Environment monitoring programme for:

­ Air quality

­ Climate

 

Regional Air Quality Monitoring Strategy revised in 2011.

-4 yearly surveillance monitoring of NES contaminants other than PM10 completed in 2013

2013-22

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with the Regional Air Quality Monitoring Strategy

 

2013-22

­ Report on breaches of the National Environmental Standards in accordance with the standard

 

Monitor PM10 concentrations[1] continuously in the Napier, Hastings and Awatoto airsheds.  Data collected should comply with performance targets:

­  (less than 5% of data missing) and

­  75% valid data (less than 25% of measured and archived values unaffected by calibration and instrument fault events)

­ Winter time Mobile PM10 monitoring campaign

­ Source apportionment monitoring in the region’s airsheds as needed to identify pollution sources

­ Undertake the 3-yearly review of the Air Quality Monitoring Strategy

 

HBRC will provide financial assistance for those who qualify for insulation and clean heat support

Number of clean heat systems installed under financial assistance programme

Following a slow start, the number of clean heat installations is now meeting agreed targets

2013-22

-  Provide loan assistance to homeowners region wide for home insulation and clean heat under HBRC’s financial assistance programme

 

 

­ Develop and implement a communications strategy to promote the programme

 

Hawke’s Bay’s air is suitable to breathe

Compliance with National Environmental Standard (NES) for Air Quality

In 2013, Napier airshed exceeded the standard 5 times, Hastings airshed exceeded the standard 16 times and Awatoto exceeded it once.

­ Napier Airshed meets NES: No more than 1 exceedance by 2016

­ Hastings Airshed meets NES: No more than 3 exceedances by 2016 and no more that 1 exceedance by 2020

­ Annual reporting against NES for Air Quality


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 3 – Water Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Water Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will increase its knowledge of the region’s water resources in terms of quantity, quality and habitats so that a policy framework can be developed to sustainably manage the water and land resources within Hawke’s Bay

State of the Environment monitoring programme for:

­ Climate

­ River flows

­ Groundwater levels

­ Surface water quality

­ Groundwater water quality

­ Aquatic ecosystems

­ State of the Environment monitoring network review:

·  Climate - 2008

·  River flows - 2009

·  Groundwater levels - 2008

·  Surface water quality - 2009

·  Groundwater water quality - 2008

·  Aquatic ecosystems - 2009

­ Gaps were identified in climate and rainfall

 

2013-15

­ Establish one climate station a year in response to identified requirement

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with State of the Environment monitoring strategy (reviewed in 2013/14 to reflect national reporting and regional consistency)

­ Upgrade rainfall sites as required to maintain level of service

 

­ Annual Monitoring Performance Reports

­ Achieve Quality Management System targets

Knowledge available to inform environmental flow and allocatable volume review of the following river catchments and groundwater basins:

Tukituki River; Ngaruroro River; Karamu Stream; Tutaekuri River; Ruataniwha Plains ; Heretaunga Plains

­ Information used to determine minimum flows needs updating to ensure habitat protection. Single factor assessments to determine environmental flows are no longer appropriate

­ Groundwater allocation regime proposed for Ruataniwha

­ Minimum flows required to maintain identified values, including aquatic habitat, proposed for Tukituki

­ Groundwater use estimated for Ruataniwha basin

­ Draft groundwater use report prepared for Karamu Stream catchment

 

2013-15

­ Groundwater abstraction and allocation report prepared for Heretaunga Plains

­ Environmental flow, and allocation reports prepared for the:

·   Karamu Stream, Tutaekuri River, Ngaruroro River and inflows to the Ahuriri Estuary

­ Coupled surface-groundwater model built and running scenarios for Heretaunga

 

­ Undertake Catchment Sensitivity Analysis

­ Increase IFIM surveys

­ Increase gauging

­ Groundwater/surface water interaction gauging

­ Determine methodology for in-stream assessment

­ Groundwater model development for Heretaunga

Knowledge available to inform review of water quality objectives and setting limits

­ Water quality objectives and guidelines are contained in the Regional Resource Management Plan

­ Water quality limits required to maintain identified values, including aquatic habitat, established for Plan Change 6 (Tukituki River catchment)

2013-15

­ Review of water quality guidelines and objectives completed and reported

­ Water quality requirements identified for recognised values, including aquatic habitat, established for Heretaunga Plan Change catchments (Tutaekuri and Ngaruroro Rivers, Ahuriri and Karamu Streams) and the Mohaka Plan Change catchment

 

 

­ Undertake catchment sensitivity analysis

­ Review existing plan guidelines

Knowledge available to manage nutrient inputs to rivers

­ The effects of nutrient inputs is known but information is needed on their source and quantity.

­ Nutrient sources, loads and fates determined for the Tukituki River catchment

 

2013-15

­ Report on Nutrient limits: Ngaruroro River, Tutaekuri River, Karamu Stream

 

­ Develop monitoring programmes for selected catchments

­ Undertake catchment load analysis and limits based on regional and community values

HBRC will encourage efficient and effective water use to maximise the benefits of the water allocated

Number of active water user groups

 

Implementation of water efficiency tools by Water User Groups

­ Water User Groups:

·    Three formally established and facilitated

·    One potential group under development

­ Ngaruroro, Ruataniwha and Twyford Water User Groups engaged in efficiency projects i.e. rationing and rostering and tree and vine calculator

­ Knowledge transfer through meetings, Council presentations, and one on one assistance

2013-22

­ Continue to establish and facilitate Water User Groups on a catchment priority basis

­ In conjunction with Water User Groups, investigate and apply for research grants relating to water use and resource allocation efficiency

­ Continue to transfer latest water efficiency and allocation information to Water User Groups

 

 

­ Establish and facilitate Water User Groups

­ Investigate and apply for water efficiency and allocation research grants

­ Water User Group facilitators to:

· keep up to date with latest water related information from science and other council departments and forward onto water user groups

· Ensure meetings are held to transfer knowledge

 

 

Number of consent holders with water meters operating using telemetry or web/text systems

­ Water Information Unit Established

­   Water metering web/text water use web page developed

­   749 consents using web entry system

­   507 consents reporting water use via telemetry

 

2014-2019

­ Cumulative total of 1200 consents using telemetry or a web entry system

 

 

­ Coordinate the implementation of water metering across Hawke’s Bay

­ Establish and maintain web entry and telemetry systems that encourage consent holders to accurately report their water

­ Carry out communication with the Hawke’s Bay irrigators to ensure a high level of understanding of water metering requirements

­ Continue roll out of verification programme of water meters in accordance with government regulations

 

Hawke’s Bay’s water resource is available for future generations

Allocation limits and water quality limits

 

Implementation of National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management

­ Regional Resource Management Plan contains limits for some catchments. Limits in catchments under resource pressure are currently being reviewed.  Some catchments are over allocated and some parts of the region have degraded water quality and habitats

 

Refer to other performance targets listed within this table

­ Annual Reporting against National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management and Implementation Plan

 


 

Activity 4 – Coastal Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4–Coastal Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve Performance Targets

HBRC will measure water quality at key recreation sites and make the results available to ensure public health and safety

Recreational water quality monitoring programme and website management

 

­ Weekly sampling undertaken at 30 recreational water sites, information available on website within 2 days of results being available

­ Faecal source tracking at bathing sites that regularly exceed guidelines

 

Ongoing

­ Weekly monitoring of key recreational sites as per recreational water quality monitoring plan

­ Recreational water information available on website and social network site within 2 days of results being available

­ Identification of pollution sources for sites that regularly exceed guidelines

 

­ Undertaken recreational water quality monitoring in accordance with monitoring plan and national guidelines

­ Regular monitoring of key recreational sites

­ Undertake faecal source tracking when sites exceed guideline values, communication with Land Management, TLA and Public Health teams when results are obtained

 

HBRC will continue to monitor, research and investigate coastal processes to inform coastal planning including climate change and coastal hazards

 

Annual coastal monitoring and investigation programme including:

­ Beach profiling

­ Storm monitoring

­ Sediment transport and processes investigation and modelling

­ Hazard prediction including tsunami, inundation, erosion, storm surge

 

 

­   Coastal monitoring has been undertaken for at least 11 years

­   A research and investigation programme was implemented in 2004

 

 

Ongoing

­ Annual monitoring and investigation  programme completed and reported each year

 

­ Prepare, implement and report on coastal monitoring and investigation programme

HBRC will provide long term, relevant and specific information on Hawke’s Bay’s coastal ecosystems, so that it and the community can remain engaged with, and informed of, the current state and potential threats to the health of coastal environments

 

Identify the state and health of selected regional beaches, reefs and estuaries

Identify the state and health of near-shore coastal waters and coastal sediments

Maintain an operative and relevant Coastal Monitoring Strategy

­   Monitoring undertaken according to the Coastal Monitoring Strategy (2006)

­   Annual reporting on the state of regional estuaries and sandy beaches

­   6-weekly monitoring of near-shore coastal water quality

 

Ongoing

­ Monitoring undertaken in accordance with State of the Environment Monitoring Strategy (2006) and reported on annually

2014-15

­ Five-year State of the Environment report compiled

 

­ Implement and report on monitoring as specified in the Coastal Monitoring Strategy (2006)

 

 

­ Comprehensive State of the Environment reports compiled every five years

HBRC will increase its knowledge of coastal ecosystems through targeted research and investigations so that it is better able to understand and respond to the effects of activities on the coastal environment

Undertaking specific investigation and/or research, and reporting on these outcomes where appropriate

­   Clive/Karamu –Waitangi estuary and Ahuriri estuary/Taipo stream  identified as sites of special interest

 

­ Targeted investigations into coastal receiving environments receiving stormwater discharges

­ Saline transition zones in Wairoa, Waitangi, Ahuriri and Mohaka estuaries will be investigated (weather dependent)

 

­ Develop a work programme to assess the effects of stormwater on coastal ecosystems

­ Describe the seasonal movement of the saline wedge at a variety of HB rivers/estuaries

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 5 – Gravel Management

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 5–Gravel Management

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will monitor and manage river-bed sediment to ensure flood protection schemes work as expected

River surveys (3-6 yearly) show all scheme rivers have sufficient capacity

Refer to Heretaunga Plains Scheme and Upper Tukituki Scheme sections

Ongoing

­ No decline in river flood capacity

Ongoing

Undertake gravel monitoring, assessment and extraction programmes as desired in Regional Resource Management Plan

 

The average riverbed level where gravel extracted is managed within +/- 200mm of the design grade line

Average riverbed within design grade range

 

Ongoing

­ Average riverbed within design grade range

 

Ongoing

­ Undertake river surveys every 3-6 years

No incidences of erosion or flooding as a result of undesirable gravel levels

No incidences

Ongoing

­ No incidences

 

Ongoing

­ Progress a review of gravel issues

River-bed gravel is equitably allocated to gravel extractors

The gravel allocation process complies with the Regional Resource Management Plan

 

No compliance issues

Ongoing

­ No compliance issues with gravel extraction

Ongoing

Undertake gravel allocation process as proposed in the Regional Resource Management Plan

 

River gravel management activities have no significant adverse effects on river ecology and water quality

No reported incidences of adverse impacts following gravel extraction or beach raking activities

No reported incidences

Ongoing

­ No reported incidences of adverse impacts following gravel extraction or beach raking activities

 

Ongoing

­ Undertake gravel management activities in compliance with Regional Resource Management Plan, Ecological Management Plans and River Environment Code of Practice

 

Knowledge necessary for sustainable management of riverbed gravel is improved

Completion of investigation and research work recommended in riverbed gravel scoping study

Scoping study completed in 2010. Investigation and research programme

Ongoing

­ Annual Programme of work completed

Ongoing

­ Undertake investigations and research programmes


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 6 – Open Spaces

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 6–Open Spaces

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide public access to, and manage existing Council owned parks and wetlands for multi-purpose benefits

Levels of service associated with all open space areas are set out in current management plans

Current management plans/ operation and maintenance contracts for:

­ Tutira Country Park: expires 2014

­ Tukituki wetland: expires 2014

­ Pakowhai Country Park

­ HBRC maintained cycleways

 

Management plans currently under review:

­ Pekapeka wetland: expired 2010.

­ Waitangi wetlands: expired 2012

Ongoing

­ Maintain a current Open Space Vision and Management Plan and, where appropriate, further development programmes for all open space areas and facilities

 

­ Implement management plans to deliver levels of service established

 

­ Develop management plans/ operation and maintenance contracts as required

 

 

 

­ Maintain and develop areas in accordance with management plans

 

HBRC will actively look for opportunities to provide the public with opportunities to enjoy open space available within the region with opportunities assessed against the HBRC Open Space policy and evaluation criteria

Open space policy and evaluation criteria

 

Note $745,000 remaining in HBRC open space and community facilities to provide for opportunities

Community facility and open space policy and evaluation criteria in place

Ongoing

­ Continue to assess affordable open space opportunities in accordance with the open space vision

­ Action any opportunities approved by Council

 

2014-15

­ Investigate open space development opportunities with the region’s territorial authorities that align with visitor facilities and attractions and meet policy and evaluation criteria

 

 

­ Establish levels of service and management plans for all additional open space facilities

­ Open Space network plan completed and adopted by Council.  Development opportunities being considered as part of individual regional park reviews

­ In response to submission on 2013/14 Annual Plan, Council agreed to contribute up to $100k to Central Hawke’s Bay pathway development

 


Introduction

Regulation activities cover HBRC’s regulatory functions for resource use, building dams and safe navigation of the region’s navigable waters.

The empowering legislation for HBRC functions includes the Resource Management Act 1991, the Local Government Act 2002, the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941, the Building Act 2004, the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996, and the Maritime Transport Amendment Act 2013.

Link to Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways:

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by enforcing rules and issuing resource consents which enable access and use of natural and physical resources, based on sustainable management principles.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by permitting sustainable use of the natural and physical resources through permitted activities within the rules and administering resource consents.

·      Safe and accessible recreational facilities – by considering recreation where appropriate when assessing resource consents.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by protecting the natural environment, particularly fresh water quality for drinking; fresh and coastal water quality for ecological support and recreational purposes; and air quality.


 

Significant Negative Impacts

The functions of the Resource Management Act for this group of activities seek to balance the requirement to safeguard the environment while providing for the social, economic and cultural needs of the wider community.

In some instances, decisions made on individual resource consents can enable economic and social growth, while on other occasions it can limit such benefits.

The costs to HBRC and individuals of implementing the RMA can be significant, if not kept to actual and reasonable levels.


 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 


Net Funding Requirement: Regulation

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Resource Consent Processing

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Resource Consent Processing

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will ensure that accurate information about resource consent requirements and processes is readily available

Application and submission guides are available in electronic and hard copy form

 

Currently meeting all performance targets

2012-22

­ No verified reports of inaccurate information being given in relation to resource consent requirements

2012-22

­ Electronic application and submission forms, application and submission guides are available through HBRC’s website

 

 

­ Maintain up-to-date application forms and information packs

 

HBRC will process resource consent applications in a timely manner

100% of resource consents processed within statutory timeframes set down in the Resource Management Act 1991

 

100% of non-notified resource consents, 100% of limited notified resource consents and 100% of notified resource consents processed within statutory timeframes in the 2013/2014 financial year

2012-22

­ 100% of resource consents processed within statutory timeframes

 

­ Continued tracking of Resource Management Act timeframes

­ Ensure professional competency of staff to provide regulatory services

­ High performance ratings achieved in the biennial Ministry for the Environment Survey on Resource Management Act performance of Local Authorities

­ Maintain clear communication with resource consent holders and applicants over timelines, information requirements and consenting processes

 


 

Activity 2 – Compliance Monitoring

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2–Compliance Monitoring

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will check that consent holders comply with the resource consent conditions imposed to protect the environment

Number of consents monitored in accordance with the adopted compliance monitoring strategy

91% of programmed inspections/reports completed in 2012/13

At the end of the 2012/13 year there were 4 consents that were graded significant non compliance that were more than six months old and not resolved

 

2012-22

­ 90% of programmed inspections/reports completed each year

­ 95% of monitored consents achieve an overall grading of full compliance

 

­ Maintain an up-to-date compliance monitoring strategy which reflects the level of risk to the environment

­ Annual Work programmes

HBRC will provide a 24 hr/7 day a week pollution response service for reporting environmental problems

Duty management/Pollution Management response system

24 hour Duty management/Pollution Management response system in place

2012-22

­ 24 hour duty Management/pollution management response system maintained

 

­ Appropriate appointments of staff to operate systems


 

Activity 3 – Maritime Safety & Navigation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3–Maritime safety and Navigation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide local navigation safety control of shipping and small craft movements and provide navigation aids to ensure the region’s navigable waters are safe for people to use

The Navigation Safety Bylaws and Port and Harbour Safety Management System

­ Bylaws came into force on January 15th 2012.  A number of incidents concerning safety and compliance now require that parts of the bylaws must be reviewed in 2014

­ A Maritime New Zealand accredited Harbour Safety Management System for the Napier Pilotage Area is valid until 2017

­ Engage with commercial and recreational users to improve relationships

 

2012-22

­ Bylaws to be reviewed in 2016

­ Maintain a Maritime New Zealand accredited Harbour Safety Management System for the Napier Pilotage Area

­ Marine accidents and incidents are investigated and acted upon using education and enforcement as appropriate

­ Region wide risk assessment and review of current work programme with forward looking recommendations by 1 July 2014

­ Review community education effectiveness by 1 July 2014

­ Complete installation of navigation aids at Pourerere

 

 

­ Hawke’s Bay Regional Council provides an appropriately qualified and experienced Harbourmaster

­ Review human resources required to effectively carry out the Harbourmaster role

­ Maintain Harbour Safety Management System. Monitor and enforce Navigation Safety Bylaws

­ Review resources required to enable effective enforcement of bylaws

 


 

Activity 4 – Building Act Implementation

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4–Building Act Implementation

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

Process Building Act consent applications within timeframes

Contract with Waikato Regional Council to process dam consents on behalf of HBRC

Contract in place

2012-22

­ Maintain contract with Waikato Regional Council, for the processing of dam building consents

 

­ Maintain contract

­ Review Council’s preparedness for Building Act implementation

Maintain an accurate Dam Register and help dam owners prepare dam safety assurance programmes in accordance with Building Act timeframes

All known dams have been recorded on the Dam Register, and dam owners informed of Building Act requirements

 

All known dam owners informed of Building Act requirements and timeframes

2012-22

­ 100% of dams comply with regulation requirements that come into force in July 2014

 

­ Maintain staff levels and increase their knowledge of Building Act requirements

 

HBRC will investigate illegally built dams and will ensure that they are removed or made compliant

An illegally built dam is made compliant or removed within six months of identification

Any illegally built dam is made compliant or removed within six months of identification

2012-22

­ 100% of dams comply with regulations

 

­ Maintain staff levels and increase their knowledge of Building Act requirements

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Animal and plant pest control is carried out in accordance with HBRC’s Regional Pest Management Strategy and the Biosecurity Act 1993.

Biosecurity covers the inter-related programmes of:

·      Regional animal pest control

·      Regional plant pest control

·      Contribution to TBfree NZ vector management and control programme in HB.

·      Development of regional pest management strategies and contribution to national strategy issues.

 

Links to Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by providing an environment for restoring native biodiversity and ensuring that it is maintained for future generations to enjoy.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by reducing the economic impact that pests have on agricultural and horticultural production, and minimising the impact that the presence of pests may have on economic growth.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by reducing the presence of pests that impact on human health, and increasing Hawke’s Bay’s biodiversity for public enjoyment.


 

Significant Negative Impacts

Because Animal pest control is undertaken using a range of methods including poisons and traps, and Plant pest control can involve the use of agrichemicals there is the potential for a number of non-target animal and plant species to be killed.

To offset these potential negative impacts, HBRC ensures staff and contractors follow good industry practice for biosecurity activities. Also, significant biodiversity enhancement from pest control activities includes improved native birdlife and revegetation of native flora. Increased regional economic returns can also be expected to accrue through increased production and reduced pest control costs when key pests are well managed.

If adequate pest control is not carried out, pests can have significant adverse effects on lifestyles, quality of living and primary productivity.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

 


Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Biosecurity

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Regional Biosecurity Programmes

HBRC will develop and implement regional pest management strategies that improve biodiversity and economic prosperity

Maintain a current Regional Pest Management Strategy

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1–Regional Biosecurity Programme

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve Performance Targets

HBRC will provide effective pest management programmes that improve regional biodiversity and economic prosperity

 

Regional Animal Pest Control and Bovine Tb Vector Control Programmes

Hectares of rateable land kept at low possum numbers. Low possum numbers means no more than five possums caught per 100 traps set out at night

­ June 2012 Possum Control Area (PCA) programme: 467,000 ha

­ 2012:  Animal Health Board programme over rateable land: 500,000 ha

 

    Total: 967,000 ha

 

­ Monitoring shows majority of areas under PCAs have trap catches less than 3%

­ By 2016 all rateable land will be reduced to low possum numbers (total rateable land in Hawke’s Bay = 1,000,000 ha)

 

Rateable land in transition from the Animal Health Board programme:

2014-15:  30,000 ha

2015-16:  40,000 ha

 

Rateable land in Possum Control Area (PCA) Programme:

June 2014:  534,000 ha

 

Of the PCAs monitored, less than 10% of the monitoring lines exceed 5% trap catch

Ongoing

­ Transfer all rateable land under Animal Health Board (AHB) vector control to the PCA programme when AHB vector control stops

­ Ensure areas under the PCA programme are maintained with low possum numbers by education, encouragement and where necessary, compliance

­ Provide an effective region wide possum control product subsidy scheme so materials are readily available to occupiers undertaking their own control

­ Undertake possum control along boundaries where there is a risk of re-infestation

­ Prepare an annual trend and education monitoring programme for the following financial year before 30 May

­ Where enforcement action is required staff will issue “Notices of Direction” and encourage land occupiers to comply with that Notice

­ Undertake monitoring to confirm the compliance of no less than 10% of the area under the PCA programme in any one year

 

The number of active rook nests treated annually across the region

 

Current performance 2012

­ North of SH5 - 95 active nests treated

­ South of SH5 - 686 active nests treated

 

Ongoing

­ Monitoring indicates a downward trend in active rook nest numbers in both areas (North and South of SH5)

 

Ongoing

­ Annually treat every active nest in all known rookeries within Hawke’s Bay

­ Ground control rooks where operational conditions permit

Response time to rabbit complaints/enquiries

 

An initial response is given within 5 working days of receipt of each rabbit related complaint/enquiry

 

Ongoing

­ An initial response is given within 5 working days of receipt of each rabbit related complaint/enquiry

 

­ Maintain regional rabbit night count and Rabbit Haemorrhagic Disease (RHD) monitoring programme

­ Provide advice and education to occupiers where they wish to reduce rabbit or hare impacts on their property

­ Record and respond to property owner complaints where rabbits are damaging neighbouring properties.

­ Management plans for properties above McLean Scale 4; identify the cost benefits of undertaking control measures necessary for effective long term management on that property and any risks of not undertaking control to reduce numbers below McLean Scale 4

 

Responsiveness to properties identified with rabbit populations over McLean Scale 4

 

Management Plans prepared within 4 months of identification

 

Ongoing

­ A management plan is prepared within four months for each property identified with rabbit numbers above McLean Scale 4

 

Plant Pest Control

Routine plant pest inspections of areas infested with plants controlled under HBRC Regional Pest Management Strategy

 

­ All known infestations of ‘service delivery’ Total Control plant pest sites visited annually and plants controlled

­ All known infestations of ‘occupier responsibility’ visited annually

 

­ Land around all known infestations of total control plants inspected at least every 3 years

­ All areas of high potential risk visited annually and checked for possible new plant pest incursions

Ongoing

­ All known infestations of ‘occupier responsibility’ Total Control plant pest sites are visited annually

­ All known ‘service delivery’ Total Control plant pest sites are visited annually and plants controlled.

 

 

­ All Privet sites identified through complaints controlled within 6 months of complaint

­ The land around all known infestations of Total Control plants is inspected at least every 3 years

­ All areas of high potential risk are visited annually and checked for possible new plant pest incursions

 

Ongoing

­ Undertake at least annual control on all ‘service delivery’ Total Control plant pests to prevent their seeding

­ Undertake monitoring to measure ‘service delivery’ Total Control plant pests

­ Record outputs for key ‘service delivery’ plant pests (Privet and Pinus Contorta)

 

­ Record all total control plant visit numbers

Pest Management Strategies

­ Current strategy in place until 2017

 

2013-2015

­ Review the current Regional Pest Management Strategy (RPMS) and complete new Plan by 2015

 

­ Review of current Regional Pest Management Strategy to be completed during 2014/15

 

Undertake research and investigation to quantify and/or increase the economic, biodiversity or animal/human health benefits of pest control

­ At least one new initiative undertaken annually

Ongoing

­ Undertake at least one research/investigation initiative annually

Ongoing

­ Buy new releases of biological control agents where appropriate

­ Implement research/investigation to help deliver or quantify the effectiveness of the biosecurity programme

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Emergency Management covers a range of activities to meet Civil Defence and natural hazard management responsibilities. These activities aim to: identify potential hazards to the community and the means of reducing their impact; prepare the community for potential civil defence emergencies; and assist with the response to and recovery from any emergencies that occur.

HBRC administers both the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group and the Coordinating Executive Group, both of which have responsibilities for the implementation of the Hawke’s Bay Group Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan.

The relevant legislation for this function of HBRC is the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 and the Resource Management Act 1991.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by providing sound advice on rainfall and water flows during flood conditions and hazard information for land use planning purposes.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by enhancing community resilience through the promotion of community response plans and business continuity planning.

·      Strong regional leadership and a sense of belonging – by co-ordinating groups of organisations, and ensuring their understanding of and collaborative contribution to community resilience and emergency response and recovery activities.


 

·      Supportive, caring and inclusive communities – by providing advice that enables individuals to make sound decisions on the risk they are willing to live with and assisting with their effectiveness to respond and recover from a disaster.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by providing flood warning and forecasting and information on how to reduce hazards to encourage community resilience and preparedness.

Significant Negative Impacts

There are no significant negative impacts on the environment as a result of the activity.  As a result of research to date, there are now restrictions on development in some areas to avoid hazards, such as coastal erosion, flooding and earthquakes, which have impacts on the cultural and social aspects of the community. However the positive impacts on long term health, safety and economic sustainability are considered to outweigh the potential negative social impacts.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Emergency Management

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – HB Civil Defence Emergency Management Group

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– HB Civil Defence Emergency Management Group

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will reduce the impact of long term natural and man-made hazards to life and property, eliminating these risks if practicable, and if not seek the reduction of their impact

 

Assessment of natural and manmade hazards will be completed for at risk areas in Hawke’s Bay

As part of the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (HBCDEM) Plan:

­ A hazardscape, (or landscape of hazards) assessment has been completed

­ Priorities to reduce the impact of hazards are identified

­ A work programme to identify and reduce the impact of hazards is approved

Hawke’s Bay Joint Hazard Strategy for Local Authority Land-use Planning completed

 

2012-22

­ Advocate to Territorial Authorities for the consideration and inclusion of hazard information as part of their land use planning functions

­ In conjunction with TLAs, provide public advice on the impacts of hazards

­ Complete changes to the Resource Management Act 1991 statutory plans that reflect the integrated approach of the Joint Hazard Strategy

­ Review and implement the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan

­ Advocate coordination between the HBRC works programme and the readiness priorities in the HBCDEM Plan

­ Become involved in TLA planning processes under the RMA

­ Provide public advice through a range of media (internet/public forums)

 

Number of hazards research projects commissioned each year

At least one new research project commissioned each year, for example, tsunami inundation modelling and fault line mapping for Wairoa completed 20 October 2011

 

2012-22

­ At least one new research project commissioned each year

­ Commission research every year based on HBRC Hazard Research Plan and priorities set out in the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan

Percentage of surveyed residents that are aware of hazard risks and can identify earthquake, flooding, and tsunami as major hazards in Hawke’s Bay

Survey 2008 asked residents to identify hazard risk to their livelihood:

­ 94% identified earthquake

­ 60% identified flooding/heavy rainfall

­ 34% identified tsunami

2012-22

­ Awareness of earthquake, flooding/heavy rainfall and tsunami hazard risks show an increase over time

­ Specific target is:  more than 50% of residents can identify tsunami as one of the region’s major hazards by 2018

­ As measured in a 3 year survey

­ Prepare and implement a communications plan to target hazards to highlight in a promotion

­ Promote hazard awareness through public displays such as tsunami and 1931 earthquake displays and produce hazard education material

­ Community Survey every three years

Satisfaction of Territorial Authorities and professionals involved in land use planning decision making with the quality, format and relevance of hazard information supplied

Hazard Research Bibliographic Database available online and several research projects commissioned and completed including tsunami, faultline and flood modelling

Territorial Authorities surveyed 2011 - 83% said information was relevant and the quality of information was rated high

2012-22

­ All Territorial Authorities and planning professionals are satisfied with the quality, format and relevance of hazard information supplied/available as assessed by an evaluation and feedback form every three years

­ Continue work to identify sources of hazards and ensure this information is collected, sorted, recorded, and stored in a relevant manner

 

­ Actively encourage best practice on hazard avoidance/mitigation by ensuring territorial authorities and professionals involved in land use planning decision making are informed of relevant hazards and risks

 

HBRC will maintain and where appropriate increase the readiness of Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (HBCDEM) and the community to respond to a civil defence emergency

 

 HBRC response to a Civil Defence emergency is coordinated, appropriate, effective and efficient

 

A region-wide exercise is held every three years with all HBCDEM Group agencies

2012-22

­ Complete HBCDEM Group Training Directive

­ Maintain three yearly exercise programmes

­ Corrective Actions that the HBCDEM group has responsibility for are implemented in accordance with the Corrective Action Plan

­ Review and implement HBCDEM Plan. Exercise programme maintained and exercise reports completed with Corrective Action Plans

­ Support the operation and engagement of the Training Advisory Group

­ Support Territorial Authorities in completing Community Response Plans for specific communities

 

The level of support provided to the HBCDEM Group in directing and co-ordinating personnel and resources for response and recovery operations

Adopted HBCDEM Group Plan is in place

2012-22

­ An active Welfare Advisory Group which meets at least 4 times a year

 

­ Review of HBCDEM Plan

­ Maintain and support the HBCDEM Joint Committee and Chief Executives Group

­ Maintain and support the HB Welfare Advisory Group

The percentage of surveyed residents prepared to cope for at least three days on their own

­ Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group website is maintained with information on preparedness

­ Current advertising programme

­ 90% surveyed residents said they had enough food stored for three days and had some way of cooking without electricity

­ Over 55% had enough water stored not including water in hot water cylinders

2012-22

­ 90% residents have enough food stored for three days and had some way of cooking without electricity

­ 75% have enough water stored

­ As measured by three yearly survey

­ Maintain and develop information and materials that support the Group Website, regular radio advertising and other promotional opportunities in accordance with communications strategy

­ Support the National “Get ready, Get thru” programme and national “Get Ready” week

­ Maintain Interagency Communication Group who develop and implement a programme of public CDEM education

­ Survey the community every three years

 

HBRC will ensure that appropriate levels of response capabilities are in place and maintained across the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (HBCDEM) Group

Established Emergency Management Plans including training and procedures

 

­ HBCDEM Group Plan and Standard Operating Procedures are implemented

­ Established Group Emergency Operations Centre with supported training programme

 

2012-22

­ Maintain Plans and Standard Operating Procedures and ensure Group Emergency Coordination Centres can be ready for operation within six hours of event

­ Effectively and efficiently manage any emergency events from initial warning until a safe situation returns

­ Ensure Plans and procedures confirm agency roles and responsibilities for good co-ordination

­ Maintain two Group Emergency Coordination Centres (Hastings and Napier) which are ready for operation, with supporting Group Standard Operating Procedures

­ Conduct training for staff assigned to Group emergency management roles

Maintain the CDEM Group’s emergency management and civil defence capacity with the capability of effectively responding to an emergency event

­ Established Emergency Management Team and training programme in place

2012-22

­ Maintain established teams, training programmes, Emergency Operations Centre, Manuals, in accordance with HBCDEM Group Plan

 

­ HBRC staff have been assigned emergency management roles and are having training annually

­ Effectively and efficiently manage any emergency event from initial warning until a safe situation returns

 

HBRC will ensure the recovery from emergencies is managed in accordance with the scale of the event

Facilitate and maintain Lifelines Group who have effective input into Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group plans

 

Dedicated CDEM Group Recovery Manager appointed

 

A relevant CDEM Group Recovery Plan is adopted and maintained

 

­ The Lifelines Group currently has lost momentum

­ The CDEM Group has no appointed Recovery Manager or specific Recovery Plan

2012 – 2022

­ Partner Territorial Authorities have appointed local recovery managers

 

­ Provide strategic guidance for Group Recovery Plan as part of the review of the CDEM Group Plan

­ Review and support Lifelines Group


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 2 – Hazard Assessment & Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Response

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Hazard Assessment & Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Response

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will ensure it has an emergency response capability that can provide regional hazard assessments and warning systems to the Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group and to manage Council assets

 

Effectiveness of response capacity and capability

HBRC maintains an emergency management and civil defence capacity capable of responding effectively to an emergency event

Ongoing

­ Maintain established Teams, training programmes, Emergency Operations Centre, Manuals and Business Continuance Plan

 

­ Annual training and management of teams.

­ Annual maintenance of Emergency Operations Centre Manuals and Business Continuity Plans

24 hour duty management system is in place

24 hour Duty Management warning and response system with capacity to scale up for emergency response is in place

Ongoing

­ Operate an effective 24-hour Duty Management Service and respond to urgent public enquiries and complaints in a timely professional manner

 

­ Maintain log of duty calls along with record of warning and watches of severe weather or other hazardous events managed

HBRC provide reliable warning of flooding from the region’s major rivers to at risk communities in the Wairoa, Tutaekuri, Ngaruroro and Tukituki areas

Percentage of time that priority telemetered rainfall and river level sites are operational throughout the year

­ Priority sites: 98%

­ Overall: 92%

 

Priority sites were operational for 2011-12:

­ Priority sites: 97.9%

­ Overall: 97.8%

 

Percentage of time that priority telemetered rainfall and river level sites are operational throughout the year:

2012-19:  98% average for all key sites

­ Regular checking and maintenance of all rainfall and level recorder stations

­ Repair of all key sites damaged during storms within four weeks

­ Programme to double the number of priority sites to increase operation reliability over 10 year period

 

A flood forecasting system is available on the web to advise the community on likely rainfall and flooding

Percentage of the region at risk of flooding from large rivers, covered by a flood forecasting model

60% of the region’s floodplains are covered with a flood forecasting model

 

Percentage  of the region covered by a flood forecasting model

2014-15:  70%

2021-22:  100%

 

­ Continue to develop and upgrade flood forecast models of flood plain areas

Computer models reflect what happens during a flood event and give up to two hours highly reliable forecasting, up to 12 hours moderately reliable forecasting and 48 hours total forecast

Ongoing

­ No decrease in model performance

 

­ Continue to survey rivers to update models every six years

­ Calibrate models to significant storm events

 

Information available on HBRC’s website during storm events

 

Web information is updated every three hours during significant (greater than five Year) storm events

Ongoing

­ No change

 

­ Programme for web information during storm events maintained

Peak flood forecast river flows agree within 25% of the actual flows

 

25%

Ongoing

­ No decrease in performance.

 

­ Calibration of models to significant storm events.

HBRC will continue to improve its knowledge and understanding of flood risks from the areas exposed to severe weather events and the effects of runoff onto low lying land and into the network of drains, streams and rivers of the region

 

Percentage of area mapped for flood hazard, including the impact of climate change

Up to date flood hazard information is available for 96.9% of high risk community areas, and 20% of the lower risk community areas

2014-15:  100%

­ To update flood hazard information for high risk communities

 

2021-22:   100%

­ Up to date flood hazard information available for lower risk communities

 

 

­ Identification of high flood risk areas

­ Programme of collection and distribution of flood hazard information for high and low risk areas

HBRC will to respond to oil spills within the Hawke’s Bay Coastal Marine boundary and maintain a Tier 2 oil spill response plan which identifies priority areas in HB for protection in the event of a major spill

Current Tier 2 Oil Spill Plan is in place and training is being implemented

Current Tier 2 Oil Spill Response Plan is in place and a programme of appropriate training and exercises in accordance with the provisions of the plan and the requirements of the Maritime Transport Act 1994 has been undertaken over previous years

 

­ Operative Marine Oil Spill Plan is maintained, along with trained personnel

­ Annual training and management of teams

­ Annual maintenance plan

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Transport covers planning, provision of passenger transport, and coordination and provision of road safety initiatives across Hawke’s Bay.

The driving force is the Regional Land Transport Strategy and the Regional Land Transport Programme, which the Regional Transport Committee is required to prepare.

The Land Transport Act 1998 and the Land Transport Management Act 2003 and its Amendment Act 2008, require HBRC to consider the transport needs of disadvantaged people. In September 2011, HBRC adopted a Regional Public Transport Plan to address this and guide it in providing a passenger transport system that provides good quality local public services for the people of Hastings and Napier.

HBRC operates a Total Mobility Scheme that provides a subsidised taxi service for people with serious mobility constraints by way of taxi vouchers.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by taking into account demand for future public bus services and environmental considerations in transport planning with the Hastings District Council and Napier City Council.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by providing reliable and secure public transport infrastructure.


 

·      Transport, infrastructure and services that are safe, effective and integrated – by providing public transport services; integration with other modes of transport (for example walking and cycling); and road safety programmes.

·      Strong regional leadership and a sense of belonging – by providing increased opportunities for social interaction; travel options for the workforce; and more access to essential services and amenities.

·      Safe and accessible recreational facilities – by increased opportunities for social interaction and travel options for the workforce; greater access to essential services and amenities; and ensuring integration with walking and cycling opportunities.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by reducing traffic congestion and providing an environmentally sustainable choice of transport.

Significant Negative Impacts

There are no anticipated significant negative impacts from this group of activities which seek to provide an integrated, safe and efficient transport network.

 



 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Transport

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Regional Road Safety

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– Regional Road Safety

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will engage, co-ordinate and implement sustainable regional road safety initiatives so that Hawke’s Bay roads and pathways are safe and accessible, and that the emotional and financial costs of road traffic crashes are reduced

 

Effectively implement Regional Safety Action Plans with the relevant objectives of the Regional Land Transport Strategy; Safer Journeys 2020; and the New Zealand Injury Prevention Strategy

 

­ Quarterly reviewed and updated Regional Safety Action Plans (RSAP) for Wairoa, Napier, Hastings, and Central Hawke’s Bay

­ RSAPs co-ordinated road safety initiatives involving engineering, enforcement and education. Key stakeholders include:

·      Territorial authorities

·      NZ Police

·      Hawke’s Bay District Health Board

·      Accident Compensation Corporation

·      New Zealand Transport Agency

·      Community groups responsible for the allocation, monitoring and contract management of New Zealand Transport Agency funding

2013-22

­ Regional Safety Action Plans for Wairoa, Napier, Hastings, and Central Hawke’s Bay will be reviewed quarterly with a focus on key issues to be addressed

­ Road safety programmes are implemented to reduce the incidence and severity of road traffic crashes and to align with the key outcomes and issues in the RoadSafe Strategic Plan

 

­ Hold quarterly review meetings with Territorial Authorities and key road safety partners to ensure Regional Safety Action Plans are relevant and up to date

­ Undertake a six monthly review of the RoadSafe Strategic Plan to ensure all goals, outcomes and objectives are relevant and take into account key road safety issues identified in the Safer Journeys Report, Communities at Risk Register and the New Zealand Transport Agency briefing notes


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 2 – Regional Land Transport Strategy

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Regional Land Transport Strategy

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

Through the region’s transport strategy HBRC will promote improved integration of all transport modes, land use and efficient movement of freight

Approved Regional Land Transport Strategy in place

Adopted in June 2012

2014-15

­ Implement and report on current RLTS as required by statute

 

2015

­ RLTS to be replaced by Regional Land Transport Plan (includes Strategy and Programme) completed by July 2015 following public consultation

 

 

­ Freight movement in and out of Hawke’s Bay and efficient movement of traffic is addressed through implementation of key strategic projects

­ Monitor and report on achievements from the RLTS to the Regional Transport Committee

­ Begin RLTS and RLTP review process in early 2014 for, as part of development of Regional Land Transport Plan for public consultation

 

Three yearly Regional Land Transport Programme approved

This document was incorporated into the Regional Land Transport Strategy and adopted in June 2012

2013-15

­ Implement and report on Regional Land Transport Programme 2012-15 as required by statute

2015-18

­ Regional Land Transport Plan submitted to New Zealand Transport Agency by July 2015, following public consultation

 

 

­ Monitor the Regional (R) funds spending to ensure it is spent on key projects for the region

 


 

Activity 3 – Subsidised Passenger Transport

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3– Subsidised Passenger Transport

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide an accessible bus service and appropriate service infrastructure within and between the Napier, Hastings and Havelock North urban areas that will be expanded to meet the increasing need for public transport for the people of Hawke’s Bay

In accordance with Regional Land Transport Strategy

Services are delivered on regular demand-driven basis, to ensure the needs of the transport disadvantaged are considered

 

2013-15

­ Build on the improvements made over the last 3 years and ensure current levels of services are maintained and target any increase in funding towards improving existing services

 

­ Continue to regularly market current services and increase awareness of all services

­ Increase patronage and subsequent fare recovery to make improvements viable, to achieve bus fare recovery rates of:

2014-15:  40%

 

Continue improving signage, infrastructure and information at all bus stops

Major improvements have been made in Hastings and Napier; more work is yet to be done in Napier to provide better timetable information at bus stops

2013-14

­ Implement bus-stop service level standards (as outlined in Regional Public Transport Plan)

2013-15

­ Install four additional bus shelters each year (two in Hastings and two in Napier)

 

­ Work with the Napier City and Hastings District Councils to implement the bus-stop service level at key bus stops

­ Work with Napier City and Hastings District Councils to agree on the best locations for bus shelters each year

 

Where bus routes exist, at least 90% of residences and businesses are in the following walking distances of a bus stop:

­    500m:   normal conditions

­    600m:   low density/outer areas

 

About 85% compliance in Hastings and 60% in Napier

 

2013-15

­ Increase the number of bus stops in Hastings and Napier to meet the measure in the Regional Public Transport Plan

 

 

­ Ongoing survey to ensure appropriate infrastructure at key bus-stops

­ Work with Napier City and Hastings District Councils to meet targets

Changes in technology to be utilised to provide a better service

Smartcards were implemented in 2009 but no further technology opportunities have been implemented

 

2014-15

­ Investigate online top-ups for smartcards

 

­ Take advantage of changes in ticket systems that allow for online top-ups

Fare payment systems are to be simple to understand; reviewed regularly and accurately record passenger trip information

 

Fare levels will be reviewed annually

 

Fare structure last reviewed in February 2012

2013-19

­ Fare reviews to be undertaken annually

 

­ Review fares annually

Integration with other modes

Improve integration between public transport and walking and cycling

Integration made possible by the installation of bike racks on buses on major routes.

2013-15

­ Investigate further opportunities for installation of secure bike racks at major bus stops

 

­ Investigate other initiatives around the country

­ Work with Napier City and Hastings District Councils to improve integration between public transport and walking and cycling

 

Continue to provide and deliver the Total Mobility scheme in Napier, Hastings and Waipukurau for those unable to use public transport due to serious mobility constraints

 

Membership is increased and service delivered in accordance with New Zealand Transport Authority guidelines

2012-13

­ 69,000 trips made using Total Mobility vouchers

2013-15

­ Increase by at least 5% a year

 

­ Actively promote the Total Mobility Scheme

­ Work with government and disability agencies to better understand and try to meet the needs of their clients

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Introduction

Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s (HBRC) Governance and Community Engagement role and responsibilities involve decision-making, keeping regional residents informed, and ensuring that Hawke’s Bay people have a meaningful say on the direction of their region.

This group covers:

·      Strategic Alliances - HBRC working with a range of organisations - central government, university, private sector groups and councils - to provide valued services and research that is targeted and efficient.

·      Community Engagement and Communication - encompasses all HBRC purposes and functions and engagement with a broad range of stakeholders in the general community through a variety of media.

·      Response to Climate Change – some of the measures that HBRC either has in place or proposes to introduce to contribute to lowering carbon emissions in Hawke’s Bay.

·      Community Representation and Regional Leadership – Council elections and the role of Councillors in representing their constituent communities, plus providing opportunities for individuals and groups to influence decision-making.

·      Investment Company Support – the management and administration support provided to the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council Investment Company Ltd.

Links to Regional Community Objectives

This group of activities contributes to Council’s objectives for the regional community in the following ways.


·      Strong regional leadership and a sense of belonging, supportive, caring and inclusive communities – by the 9 Councillors representing their constituent communities across Hawke’s Bay; by reflecting community views on policies considered by the Council; by managing the complexity associated with new relationships and the associated change processes; and by reducing the carbon footprint of the region and providing strategies to enable the community to adapt to those changes.

·      An environment that is appreciated, protected and sustained for future generations – by working closely with primary sector associations, Treaty of Waitangi settlement groups and government departments to provide for greater catchment/community based management of the environment.

·      A strong, prosperous and thriving economy – by actively engaging with the business community and providing information and knowledge in regular publications; by supporting Tourism Hawke’s Bay and participating in Business Hawke’s Bay, through funding from the Regional Economic Development Rate; by highlighting opportunities associated with climate change.

·      Transport, infrastructure and services that are safe effective and integrated – by working toward energy efficient ways of travelling and doing business.

·      A lifetime of good health and wellbeing – by providing resilience to changes that will occur as a result of climate change.

·      Strong regional leadership and a sense of belonging – by setting reduced emission targets to lessen HBRC’s carbon footprint.

 

Significant Negative Impacts

There are no anticipated significant negative impacts from this group of activities.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Expenditure and Funding

 

 

 

Net Funding Requirement: Governance and Community Engagement

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 1 – Community Partnerships

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 1– Community Partnerships

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will engage in strategic relationships that help better achieve its vision and purposes

Formalisation of strategic alliances that are sector and institutionally-based

HBRC provides grant funding to a range of organisations with no formal requirements on performance or reporting

2012-15

­ Create a bi-annual forum of primary production sector associations

2016-22

­ HBRC continues to work in partnership with strategic allies to progress strategic goals

 

 

­ Primary associations’ sector alliance to be formally developed and meetings scheduled

 

­ Shared service arrangements are identified and agreed to

HBRC will work in partnership with treaty claimant groups to govern natural resources and to jointly explore sustainable economic opportunities in Hawke’s Bay

 

Regional Planning Committee operating successfully

HBRC’s Maori Standing Committee is currently consulted in relation to a range of Council activities

2014-15

­ Regional Planning Committee permanently established

 

­ Legislation to be passed to permanently establish Hawke’s Bay Joint Regional Planning Committee

HBRC will contribute to support the development of Regional Public Infrastructure projects

Evaluation of Regional Public Infrastructure projects and which ones to support

Limited financial assistance has been provided to a number of Infrastructure projects

 

2014/15

$0.5M provision for the Wairoa Community Centre upgrade

$0.5M provision for Te Mata Park Visitor and Educational Centre

 

 

­ Requests received and evaluated and funding assigned to projects

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 2 – Community Engagement & Communications

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Community Engagement & Communications

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will communicate its purpose and direction to the community. The community will know what it is being done and why

On-time delivery of Annual Plan, plan change, State of the Environment and statutory documents

­ 2012-22 Long Term Plan, State of the Environment, 2012-13 Annual Report, 2013-14 Annual Plan

2014-15

­ Long Term Plan, State of the Environment, Annual Report, Tukituki Plan change

 

­ Annual review of statutory document timing and appropriate engagement tools

Councillors, Executive Management and staff available to speak/inform on HBRC activities

­ 2012-13: As requested

 

2014-15

­ Measure number of interactions

 

 

­ Convert to blog/online dialogue as appropriate

­ Maintain focus on media and face-to-face engagement

­ Initiate a system to count interactions

Number of media releases generated; uptake of digital technologies

­ 2012-13:    148 HBRC releases Active use of HBRC website, social media, video and images

2014-15

­ 90 Releases; Number of social media posts

 

 

­ Adopt digital tools as appropriate, including social media, with increasing use of video

Regional newsprint media coverage averages > 90% positive/neutral

­ 2012-13: 97.0% pos/ neutral (to end 2012)

2014-15

­ Not less than 95% average pos/neutral

 

 

­ Regular review of Risk Management profile

­ Maintain Communication Plans for key work programmes


 

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 2– Community Engagement & Communications

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide opportunities for the community to be involved in its decision making processes. Community engagement will be a key component of all major programmes and projects

Number of council meetings and workshops

­ 2012-13: Council/Committee 16+33; Public Excluded sessions seven; Workshops four

2014-15

­ Open reporting of Council/ Committee items

 

 

­ Maintain focus on transparency and manage Council workshop and public exclusion expectations

Clearly flagged opportunities for input, submissions and other feedback into HBRC documents

­ Ad hoc selection of appropriate communication tools

­ Engagement process not clearly understood by HBRC staff (and community)

2014-15

­ Refresh and maintain annual HBRC Communications Plan

­ Adopt Structured engagement process enabling transparency of communication tool selection, visible to staff and the community (published)

Number of public meetings, workshops and public events (includes awards and field days)

­ 2012-13: six public meetings (Tukituki Choices), four Annual Plan public meetings; six public events (other)

2014-15

­ Meetings, workshops and events strongly considered for major projects and in HBRC’s statutory role

 

 

­ Focus on opportunities for community engagement and public participation

HBRC will provide information that is relevant to the community and communities of interest. Information will be audience appropriate

Delivery of updates on HBRC activities and progress

­ 2012-13: 4 region newsletters, 4 ‘mini’ newsletters, community newsletters

2014-15

­ Generate region, community and consent holder/ catchment newsletters

 

 

­ Maintain and measure community engagement across key HBRC programmes

­ Use surveys and market research tools as appropriate

Facilitation of agreed stakeholder groups

­ 2012-13: 97 strategic and stakeholder groups

2014-15

­ Audit number of groups

 

­ Work effectively with  stakeholder groups

Timely delivery information to communities of interest

­ Perceived ad hoc timing/distribution of targeted communication

2014-15

­ Appropriate ‘tool’ selected according to programme needs

 

­ Adopt structured and transparent timing, visible to all stakeholders and interested parties


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 3 – Response to Climate Change

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 3– Response to Climate Change

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will increase the community’s resilience to climate change

HBRC’s corporate total annual Greenhouse Gas emissions measure in carbon dioxide equivalents (excluding Port of Napier Ltd)

885 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalent based on 2005-06 figures (excluding Port of Napier Ltd)

2012-22

­ Reduce corporate (excluding Port of Napier Ltd) carbon emissions from 2005/06 by:

·   10% by 2014

·   20% by 2020

·   30% by 2050

 

 

­ Monitor and report on HBRC carbon emissions

­ Quantify current and future carbon off-sets

Number of sectors through which HBRC promotes / influences reduction in carbon emissions and adaptation to climate change

HBRC works with:

­ The primary production sector on sustainable farming initiatives

­ The urban community to reduce energy use, improve air quality and improve human health through the ‘clean heat’ initiative and the Solar Hot Water Scheme

2013

­ Establish a process to monitor and report regional carbon emissions with the first report completed by 30 June 2013

­ Funding for conversion of 100 dwellings to solar hot water

2013-19

­ Continue to increase HBRC’s influence in initiatives to improve regional resilience to the impacts of climate change

­ Continue to update and report regional carbon emissions at least every three years

 

 

­ Establish a process to monitor and report on regional carbon emissions

­ Proactively seek initiatives through which HBRC is able to influence or promote a reduction in regional carbon emissions

­ Proactively seek opportunities to make investments that provide a satisfactory return and result in sustainable use of the region’s resources for HBRC’s investment portfolio

­ Establish appropriate financial procedures for the repayment of loans through voluntary targeted rates

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 4 – Community Representation & Regional Leadership

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 4–Community Representation & Regional Leadership

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide the community with a channel for representation through elected members and Iwi to enable access and influence on decision making

Councillors’ attendance at monthly Council and Committee meetings achieving at least 90% attendance of elected and appointed members

 

Attendance rate for Regional Council meetings is 95% and for other Committees, attendance of 90% has been achieved

2012-22

­ Attendance rate of 90%

 

­ Monitoring and recording attendance

 

Attendance at Maori Committee meetings

The current attendance rate for the Maori Committee is 80%

2012-22

­ Attendance rate of 80%

 

­ Monitoring and recording attendance

10 Year Plan/Annual Plan consultation during April and May with the final Plan being adopted by HBRC by 30 June

5 weeks for consultation has been achieved and two days for HBRC to hear submitters to the Annual Plan, allowing for adoption of the Plan by 30 June

2012-22

­ Consultation and submission period of at least 25 working days

 

­ The scheduling of at least 25 working days for consultation during April/May

­ Scheduling of up to three days in June to hear submissions

­ Adoption of the Plan by 30 June

 

Comply with the provisions of the Local Electoral Act 2001

Core provisions of that Act have been met

2013-14

­ Elections were held on the 12 October 2013

 

HBRC will aim to maximise Local Government effectiveness and efficiency

Facilitate and report on Local Government efficiencies achieved

A number of shared service initiatives covering some Local Government services have been completed

2014-15

­ HBLASS Ltd (the Hawke’s Bay local authority shared services company) meets the target specified by its shareholder councils in the company’s Statement of Intent

 

­ Development of business cases for further shared services opportunities between the region’s councils

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 2 Activivities

Attachment 3

 

Activity 5 – Investment Company Support

Service Levels and Performance Targets

Activity 5–Investment Company Support

Level of Service Statement

Level of Service Measure

Current Performance

Performance Targets

2014-15

Required Actions to Achieve

Performance Targets

HBRC will provide support services to the Investment Company and to any associated subsidiaries of the Investment Company

A number of Board meetings to be supported by HBRC staff

Appointed the Transitional Board of the Investment Company.

2012-22

­ Provide support for the Board meetings of the Investment Company and subsidiaries

­ Confirm the Statement of Corporate Intent each year

 

­ Ensure the company’s statutory requirements are met

­ Prepare Company Board Agendas

­ Keep records including Board Minutes

­ Ratify the Statement of Corporate Intent submitted by the investment company

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Contents                                                                                      Page

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies........................................ 1

Significant Forecasting Assumptions................................................... 7

Forecast Financial Statements........................................................... 15

Comprehensive Income Statement........................... 16

Statement of Changes in Equity................................. 17

Balance Sheet........................................................... 18

Cash Flow Statement................................................ 10

Notes........................................................................ 20

Financial Metrics.............................................................................. 29

Rate Movements.............................................................................. 31

Funding Impact Statement................................................................ 32

Explanation of Rating Method........................................................... 38

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated................................................. 41

Resource Management Charges........................................................ 51

Building Act Charges......................................................................... 59

Maritime Transport & Navigation Safety Charges.............................. 60

Charge Rates and Other Information................................................. 61

Glossary........................................................................................... 63

 


 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Hawke's Bay Regional Council, formed on 1 November 1989, is a regional local authority governed by the Local Government Act 2002.

The prospective financial statements presented are for the 12 month period beginning on 1 July 2014 and have been prepared in accordance with Sections 95 and 111 of the Local Government Act 2002.

HBRC has not presented group prospective financial statements because we believe that parent prospective financial statements are more relevant to readers. The main purpose of prospective financial statements in an Annual Plan is to provide readers with information about the core services that HBRC intends to provide to its ratepayers; the expected cost of those services, and as a consequence how much is required by way of rates to fund the intended levels of service. The level of rates funding required is not affected by subsidiaries except to the extent that HBRC obtains distributions from, or further invests in, those subsidiaries. Such effects are included in the prospective financial statements.

The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these prospective financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.

1     Basis of Preparation

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand for public benefit entities adopting New Zealand equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (NZ IFRS) and applicable New Zealand Financial Reporting Standards. The statements have been prepared under the historic cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of land and buildings, infrastructure assets, available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss and investment property. HBRC’s functional currency is New Zealand dollars (NZD) and the statements have been presented in thousands of NZD exclusive of New Zealand Goods and Services Tax (GST). Trade accounts payable and receivable are stated at GST inclusive amounts.

 

2     Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (using the weighted average cost method) and net realisable value.

3     Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently remeasured each balance sheet date at amortised cost using the effective interest method less provision for impairment.

4     Plant, Property and Equipment

i.     Operational Assets

HBRC land and buildings are shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by independent, professionally qualified valuers on the basis of market information.

Hydrological equipment is shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by suitably experienced HBRC employees, on the basis of depreciated replacement cost.  Independent, professionally qualified valuers review all such valuations.

All other operational assets are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.

The costs of assets constructed by HBRC include the cost of all materials used in construction, direct labour on the project and an appropriate amount of directly attributed costs. Costs cease to be capitalised as soon as the asset is ready for productive use.

 



 

ii.    Infrastructure Assets

Infrastructure assets are tangible assets that are necessary to fulfil HBRC’s obligations in respect of the Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Act 1941 and the Drainage Act 1908. Such assets usually show some or all of the following characteristics:

·        They are part of a system or network that could not provide the required level of service if one component was removed.

·        They enable HBRC to fulfil its obligations to the region’s communities in respect of flood control and drainage legislation.

·        They are specialised in nature and do not have alternative uses.

·        They are subject to constraints on removal.

Infrastructure assets are shown at fair value less subsequent accumulated depreciation, based on periodic, but at least triennial, valuations by suitably experienced HBRC employees, on the basis of depreciated replacement cost. Independent, professionally qualified valuers review all such valuations.

iii.   Subsequent Costs

Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to HBRC and the cost can be measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in which they are incurred.

iv.   Revaluation Adjustments

Increases in carrying amounts arising from revalued assets are credited to revaluation reserves in equity. Decreases that offset previous increases of the same asset classes are charged against revaluation reserves in equity. All other decreases are charged to the income statement.

 

 

Any accumulated depreciation at the date of revaluation is eliminated against the gross carrying amount of the asset and the net amount is restated to the revalued amount of the asset.

v.    Other Adjustments

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the income statement. When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in revaluation reserves are transferred to the accumulated balance in equity.

5     Investment Property

Investment property is residential and commercial land and buildings held to earn rental income and for capital appreciation. Such property is carried at fair value, representing open market value determined annually by independent, professionally qualified valuers. A gain or loss in value is recorded in the income statement for the period in which it arises. 

Under the Hawke’s Bay Endowment Land Empowering Act 2002, rental income that HBRC is beneficially entitled to from certain endowment land in Hawke’s Bay can only be used for the improvement, protection, management or use of Napier Harbour or the Regional Council’s coastal marine area as defined in section 2 (1) of the Resource Management Act 1991. Unspent funds are held in the Coastal Marine Area Reserve Fund.

6     Forestry Crops

Forestry crops are measured at their fair value less estimated point-of-sale costs each balance sheet date by independent, professionally qualified valuers. Fair value is determined by the present value of expected net cash flows discounted by the current market-determined pre-tax rate. A gain or loss in value is recorded in the income statement for the period in which it arises.

 

7     Financial Assets

Financial assets are initially designated into one of the four following categories set out below, depending on the purpose for which the financial asset was acquired. At each balance sheet date, all financial asset designations are re-evaluated.

i.     Financial Assets at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss

Financial assets are classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short term or are so designated by management. The category includes derivatives and has two sub-categories: financial assets held for trading, and those designated at fair value through the profit and loss at inception. Assets held in this category are classified as current assets if they are either held for trading, or are expected to be realised within 12 months of balance sheet date.

Financial assets in this category, including derivatives, are initially recognised at fair value and are measured at each balance sheet date at fair value. Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the income statement for the period in which they arise.

ii.    Loans and Receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise, for example, when HBRC makes community loans. They are included in non-current assets except when maturities are shorter than 12 months from balance sheet date.

Financial assets in this category are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or use. At each balance sheet date these financial assets are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the income statement for the period in which they arise.

 

iii.   Held-to-Maturity Investments

Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities that management have a positive intention and ability to hold to maturity.

Financial assets in this category are initially recognised at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to their acquisition or use. At each balance sheet date these financial assets are measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method. Realised and unrealised gains or losses in value are recorded in the income statement for the period in which they arise.

iv.   Available-For-Sale Assets

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are either designated in this category or are not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless there is an intention to dispose of the investment within 12 months of balance sheet date. 

Available-for-sale financial assets are carried at fair value using a quoted price if an active market exists or using discounted valuation techniques if no active market exists. Any gain or loss in value is recognised directly in equity through the statement of changes in equity for the period in which it arises. 

When an available-for-sale financial asset is sold, the accumulated fair value adjustments are included in the income statement.

At each balance sheet date, an assessment is made whether there is any objective evidence that a financial assets or group of financial assets is impaired. If objective evidence of impairment exists for available-for-sale financial assets, then any cumulative loss is transferred from equity to the income statement. Such a transfer is not reversible.

 

 

 

8     Intangible Assets

Intangible assets comprise acquired computer software licences. All intangible assets with finite lives are carried at the historical cost incurred to acquire and bring into use the specific software less accumulated depreciation.

9     Impairment of Non Financial Assets

Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortisation and are tested for impairment at each balance sheet date. Assets that are subject to amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

An impairment loss is recognised in the income statement for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value, less costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows.

10   Depreciation

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts to their residual values over their estimated useful lives. Assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date. Major depreciation periods are:

Asset Category

Years

Buildings

           10 - 100

Site Improvements

             10 - 40

Vehicles

               3 - 10

Plant & Equipment

               3 - 25

Computer Equipment

               4 - 10

Computer Software & Licenses

                  3 - 5

Infrastructure Assets

             25 - 70

 

No depreciation is provided for stop banks, berm edge protection, sea or river groynes, drainage works or unsealed roads. These assets are not considered to deteriorate over time and, therefore, will provide a constant level of service unless subjected to a significant flood event.

11   Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet.

12   Borrowings

Borrowings are recognised initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently stated at amortised cost. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognised in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date.

13   Income Tax

HBRC’s income is exempt from tax except for amounts derived from any council-controlled organisation or port company or subsidiary port company.

14   Employee Benefits

Short-term employee benefits including salaries and wages, annual leave and contributions to superannuation schemes are recognised when they accrue to employees and are measured at undiscounted cost.

The liability for accumulating sick leave is stated as the cost of sick leave that is expected to be used.

Long-term employee benefits including long service leave and retirement gratuities are recognised at the present value of HBRC’s obligation at balance sheet date.

15   Provisions

Provisions are recognised when:

·      HBRC has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, and

·      It is more likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and

·      The amount has been reliably estimated.

Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.

16   Revenue Recognition

Revenue comprises the fair value for the sale of goods and services, net of GST, rebates and discounts.  Revenue is recognised as follows.

·      Sales of goods are recognised when a product is sold to a customer.  A sale occurs when the goods are delivered to the customer. The recorded revenue is the gross amount of the sales.

·      Sales of services are recognised in the accounting period in which the services are rendered, by reference to the completion of the specific transaction assessed on the basis of the actual service provided as a proportion of the total service provided.

·      Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method.

·      Dividend income is recognised when the right to receive payment is established.

·      Government grants are recognised as income when eligibility has been established by the grantor agency.

·      Rates are recognised as income in the accounting period in which they are set and assessed.

 

17   Leases

Leases in which a significant proportion of the risks and benefits of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the income statement net of any incentives received from the lessor on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.

18   Financial Risk Management

HBRC’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks including:

·      Market risk, including currency risk, fair value interest rate risk and price risk

·      Credit risk

·      Liquidity risk

·      Cash flow interest-rate risk.

Council’s overall risk management programme focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimise potential adverse effects on its financial performance.  HBRC uses derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts to hedge certain exposures.

HBRC enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency transactions, when purchasing major property, plant and equipment and when payment is denominated in foreign currency.

HBRC has no significant concentrations of credit risk.  We have policies in place to ensure that services are provided to customers with an appropriate credit history.

Collateral or other security is not required for financial instruments subject to credit risk.


 

19   Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities

Derivatives are initially recognised at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured at the fair value at each balance sheet date.

Where HBRC determines that it will hedge a transaction it documents at the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.

HBRC also documents that assessment, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values of hedged items.

i.     Cash Flow Hedge

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognised in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the income statement. HBRC accounts for hedges of foreign currency risk of a firm commitment as cash flow hedges.

ii.    Derivatives that Do Not Qualify for Hedge Accounting

Certain derivatives instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting and changes in the fair value of these instruments are recognised immediately in the income statement.

Any changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps due to changes in interest rates are recognised in the income statement in the period in which they occur.

 

 

20   Foreign Currencies

Transactions in foreign currencies are translated at the New Zealand rate of exchange ruling at the date of the transaction. At balance sheet date foreign monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate and exchange variations arising from these are included in the income statement.

21   Basis of Allocation of HBRC’s Indirect Costs

Clearly identifiable costs are directly charged against each activity. Indirect costs are allocated to cost centres in the first instance under a variety of methods including:

·      Floor area occupied

·      The number of full time equivalent employees

·      Assessed use of various services provided.

These costs are then charged to projects on a labour standard costing basis. The allocation unit is each working hour charged by employees at a pre-determined rate. Variances arising from this method will be allocated on the same basis as for costs of a fixed nature referred to above. Project costs are then summarized for each activity and group of activities.

22   Cautionary Note

The forecast financial statements are prepared based on best estimates available at the time of preparing the accounts. Actual results are likely to vary from information presented and the variations may be material.

The purpose of this draft plan is to consult with the community on the spending priorities outlined within it, and may not be appropriate for any other purpose.

 

 



HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Significant Forecasting Assumptions

These significant forecasting assumptions are taken directly from the Long Term Plan 2012-22.  As the LTP was completed over 2 years ago a number of these assumptions require updating to reflect current Council policy and financial markets.  Any changes to these assumptions can be found in Part 1 of this plan under the heading “Explanatory Notes of Changes between Year 3 of the LTP 2012-22 and Annual Plan 2014/15”.

Introduction

In preparing the Long Term Plan for 2012-22 a number of assumptions and predictions about the future have been made.  There are always inherent risks with such forecasting, therefore it is important that the main assumptions used in these forecasts are identified.  This section has been designed to identify these assumptions, and explain the risks associated with such assumptions.

A number of additional assumptions are highlighted in the significant activity section of this plan.

HBRC Activities and Functions

HBRC will continue to perform our existing functions in accordance with current legislation and current Council policies. These functions will be primarily carried out to meet our statutory role and responsibilities and to help meet the community outcomes as developed by the community. This plan links community outcomes to HBRC activities within each group of activities.

General Assumption

HBRC has not taken into account forecast changes in population, economic activity or climate change. It is considered that the impact of any changes in these statistics will have a minimal or very low effect on the plan’s projections.


 

A significant disaster event, particularly a flood, may have a major impact on the work programmes set out in this Annual Plan. Following such an event, HBRC will focus on response to community needs that arise as a result of the event and community recovery following the event.

Interest Rates

Information received from HBRC’s bankers, the Bank of New Zealand, in January 2012 indicated that the interest rate assumptions below for borrowing would be appropriate for inclusion on the plan:

·      The interest rate on future term borrowing between 2012 and 2022 is estimated to be between 6.50% and 7.50%. Accordingly, rates of 6.50% for 2012/13, 7.00% for 2013/14 and a rate of 7.50% for the remaining years have been assumed in this plan.

Information received from the Bank of New Zealand in January 2012 indicated that the official cash rate may gradually rise from its current low level of 2.5% to 4.5% by June 2014. HBRC cash investments and term deposits accomplish an average margin of 1.50% over the official cash rate. The following rates of interest on deposits have been used in this plan:

·      For the 2012/13 financial year – 4.15%

·      For the 2013/14 financial year – 5.20%

·      For the remainder of the plan until 30 June 2022 – 5.75%.

Cost Adjusters

All expenditure projections in the Income Statements and assets in the Balance Sheet are stated in 2012/13 dollar values; however, for the year 2013/14 and subsequent years of the plan, the following adjustments (Table 1) have been made to allow for the effect of inflationary pressures on costs.

 

Table 1: Cost Adjusters

 

Year

Wages, Salaries & other Salary Related Costs

External Expenditure

Assets

Annual (%)

Cumulative (%)

Annual (%)

Cumulative (%)

Annual (%)

Cumulative (%)

2013/14

2.4

2.4

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.2

2014/15

2.4

4.9

3.2

6.5

3.1

6.4

2015/16

2.6

7.6

3.4

10.1

3.3

9.9

2016/17

2.6

10.4

3.5

14.0

3.4

13.6

2017/18

2.4

13.0

3.4

17.9

3.1

17.2

2018/19

2.3

15.6

3.3

21.7

3.1

20.8

2019/20

2.6

18.6

3.3

25.8

3.3

24.8

2020/21

2.7

21.8

3.6

30.3

3.6

29.3

2021/22

2.7

25.1

3.5

34.8

3.6

33.9

*These assets include infrastructure, land, buildings, hydrological assets and Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Limited equity and are derived using an average price change from each of the asset categories.

 

The above rates have been taken from the Business and Economic Research Ltd (BERL) forecasts of price level adjustors, dated September 2011.

It is not anticipated that there will be any significant variations over the inflation provisions when HBRC re-tenders for maintenance and other contracts during the term of the plan.


Investments

Establish the Investment Company

The investment company, Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company Limited (HBRIC Ltd) has been established and activities commenced on 1 February 2012. Initially governance of the HBRIC Ltd will be by a Transition Board of Directors who will complete its establishment and move the company through early evaluations of potential investment projects in water storage and harvesting. This board will be replaced by a full board from 1 January 2014 which will direct the company’s affairs thereafter.

HBRIC Ltd will initially own HBRC’s shareholding in Port of Napier Limited and be funded by equity wholly owned by HBRC and advances provided by it from time to time. Future investments will be funded from a mixture of equity and advances (provided to HBRIC Ltd at no less than HBRC’s cost of borrowing).

Investment Activities

During the course of the Long Term Plan, investment of around $186M (constant 2012 dollars) is proposed to be made in new and existing investments in water storage and harvesting (Ruataniwha Plains and Ngaruroro), commercial property and logistics services (Rail: Port Hub) through advances to HBRIC Ltd, with further investment in hill country forestry as a wholly owned activity of HBRC being accounted for on HBRC’s Balance Sheet.

Table 2: Major Proposed Investments

Proposed Investment

Construction Start

Begin Operations

Expected Rate of Return

Ruataniwha Plains

July 2014

January 2018

6%

Ngaruroro River

January 2015

January 2018

6%

Rail - Port Hub

July 2014

July 2016

7.5%

Forestry

N/A

July 2013

7%

Indicative timeframes for the major proposed investments are shown in Table 2.

 

(Note:  as a result of low carbon prices, the Hill Country programme has been put on hold.)

While these projects are expected to yield cash income once they start operations, they will be accruing holding costs on funds advanced by HBRC at the interest rate it paid for its borrowings until they are operational.

Funding Investments

These investments will funded by:

·      Drawing down existing cash reserves.

·      Selling interests in existing leasehold properties.

·      Additional borrowings.

·      Securing Central Government contributions to specific investment projects.

Funds are proposed to be realised from leasehold properties in Napier by:

·      Selling freeholds to existing lessees at discounts ranging from 10%-17% from lessors interest up until 30 June 2012; and then,

·      Selling the residual cash flows from rents paid by the remaining leaseholders to an investor by 31 December 2012.

Funds are also expected to be generated from the sale of the existing portfolio of HBRC-owned Wellington leasehold properties during the 2012-2013 financial year.

 

Where HBRC borrows to fund the proposed investment, it is assumed that these borrowings will be on an interest only basis. When these investments yield a commercial return on funds invested, loans will be renegotiated to reflect some capital payments.

Forestry

During the course of the LTP, HBRC will manage the following forestry assets.

Table 3a: Forestry Assets- Carbon Forestry Investments

Site Name

Area (ha)

Significant Assumptions

Wastewater Investments: CHB

180

 

Carbon Price of $20/tonne

Return on use of funds based on HBRC’s borrowing rates as set out in this policy

Farmers will uptake Hill Country planting at a rate that allows the annual planting targets to be made

Hill Country: A planting rate of 1,600ha per annum will be sustained for years 8-10 of the LTP

Waste Water Investments: Mahia

35

 

Waihapua

250

Hill Country

Year 1: 500

Year 2: 1,000

Table 3b: Forestry Assets – Forestry Investments

Site Name

Area (ha)

Significant Assumptions

Tangoio

 

320

 

­ 20ha will be harvested in the next two years with a further 20-30ha harvested in 2019-20
(Note 20 ha harvested in early 2014)

Tutira

 

140

­ 140ha will be progressively harvested starting in 2018-19

Tutira: Manuka Honey Plantings

150

­ That the actual investment returns from UMF honey will be not reduce significantly over the life of the investment and will be similar to those projected

 

These forestry investments are restated to fair value each year; however, for the purposes of this plan the ‘property’ price adjusters as set out by BERL have not been used because it is not possible to predict the future movements and the prices over the period of the plan. This plan therefore assumes that the increase in the value of the forestry asset is limited to the silvicultural or roading work carried out on the forestry assets during each year of the plan.


 

Assets

Infrastructure Assets

All infrastructure assets (river, flood control and drainage schemes) will be operated, maintained and improved as set out in the asset management plans that have been prepared for each of the river, flood control and drainage schemes.

Schemes are funded to a level that ensures levels of service set for each scheme in the relevant asset management plan are achieved and maintained over the life of the assets.

For the purposes of projecting annual movement in the values of this asset category to fair value, the property price adjusters covering projected movement in asset construction as set out by BERL have been used.

Plant, Property and Equipment including Intangible Assets

It is assumed that HBRC’s other fixed assets continue to be provided at the level required to carry out its activities.  Depreciation on operating assets will continue to be fully funded. Combined with the proceeds of asset sales and loan funding, where appropriate, that will be sufficient to fund the ongoing programme of capital expenditure on operating assets.

The useful life of each category of asset is shown in the Statement of Significant Accounting Policies included in this plan.

For the purposes of projecting annual movement in the values of this asset category to fair value, the property price adjusters as set out by BERL have been used.

Insurance of Infrastructure Assets

HBRC currently provides cover for its infrastructure assets through a hierarchy of insurance and other available funding as follows.

1.      Commercial insurance covering 60% of infrastructure value excluding live tree edge protection up to a maximum estimated loss of $19M. (This insurance was discontinued as at 30 June 2013.)

 

 

2.      Local Authority Protection Programme (LAPP) which covers 40% of infrastructure value above an excess of $1,259,000 which will apply for the 2013-14 year and may change in subsequent years.

3.      Central Government, under the National Civil Defence Recovery Plan, will meet 60% of the value of infrastructure assets critical to the functioning of the community, above 0.002% of regional capital value and provided HBRC has taken demonstrable steps to meet the remainder of the cost.

4.      Each flood control and drainage scheme has access to a disaster reserve account.  The scheme disaster reserves are designed to meet the costs of damage that may occur in any relatively minor flood event.

5.      A Regional Disaster Reserve which is intended to cover 60% of the unfunded portion (namely that which is not met from all other funding sources) of asset reinstatement cost following a disaster event. It is a discretionary funding pool of last resort and is designed as a contribution toward the cost of reinstatement of infrastructure assets to an equivalent standard to that in place before the damage was incurred.

A number of major natural disasters, including the Christchurch Earthquake, have put significant financial pressure on the insurance market, which has driven increased insurance premiums.  As a result of insurance cost increases and stronger government commitment to meet a share of the disaster cost as set out in the National Civil Defence Emergency Management Plan, Council decided not to renew its commercial insurance cover for infrastructure assets in February 2013.

The Regional Disaster Reserve is required to be maintained with between $2.75M and $3.75M of investments.  The Reserve as at 31 March 2013 holds $3.6M. HBRC has committed to utilise approximately $720,000 as a contribution toward the rebuilding of the Makara No 1 dam.

The budgets established for the 2012-22 LTP were prepared on the basis that this reserve would not be drawn on within the 10 Year Plan period.


 

Dividend Equalisation Reserve

HBRC has established a Dividend Equalisation Reserve with the intention of having funds available to provide additional dividend income in years where the payment of a dividend from the Port of Napier Limited (PONL) is substantially less than the levels forecast. This reserve has in the past been used to insulate Council from needing to increase general rates to make up any shortfall in dividend income.

The current policy as set out in the Statement of Intent between PONL and the Council (and soon to be changed to HBRIC) calculates the dividend payout based on a return of 8% on shareholder funds, with the Council being paid 70% of that return. The remaining 30% is retained by PONL for expansion programmes, etc.

When HBRC established the Dividend Equalisation Reserve, the dividends paid by PONL were calculated as a percentage of net profit after tax, which exposed it to the risk of fluctuations in dividend payout from year to year. The current basis using a return on equity to calculate dividends has resulted in limited variability in the dividend payouts from year to year.

The Dividend Equalisation Reserve is estimated to be $2.7M at the beginning of the Long Term Plan (1 July 2012). This is forecasted to be utilised during the next 10 years for operating purposes and is estimated to have a remaining balance of $1.5M at the end of this Long Term Plan.

Funding of Open Space Initiatives and Community Facility Assistance

HBRC has adopted a policy to approve expenditure on capital related open space items and a further policy to provide assistance to community facilities within the region. This plan assumes that the majority of the initiatives as approved by these two policies will be funded by the loan facility of $7.5M. This loan facility is repayable over a 10 year period and is funded by the transfer of about $1M per annum from Council’s Sale of Land Investment account.

 

 

 

Subsidy Rates

Funding assistance will be provided by Crown agencies, primarily the New Zealand Transport Agency and Animal Health Board at the following levels:

NZTA - Operations funding assistance rates

·      Bus Services                                                                                                      50%

·      Total Mobility Scheme                                                                                     60%

·      Infrastructure Maintenance and Operations             59% (reducing by 1% a

year for each year of the LTP).

Animal Health Board

·      HBRC will continue to undertake work for the Animal Health Board on the basis that they cover all relevant costs.


 

Risks to Assumptions

The following tables (4-7) outline the risks to significant forecasting assumptions. If these assumptions prove to be incorrect, there could be a significant effect on the level of rates that HBRC plans to collect from the community. In this situation, it will re-examine its work programmes and determine if it’s appropriate to rate the community or change the scope of those programmes.

 

Table 4: Council Investment Risks

Assumptions

Risk to Assumption

Level of Uncertainty

Reasons and Financial Effects of Uncertainty

Forestry: Carbon Investments

Price falls below assumed $20/tonne

High

This is a complex issue linked to global politics and economic performance. Financial modelling shows that the long term carbon price could reduce to $15/tonne and the afforestation project would still make a 6% return on investment. In addition HBRC can hold carbon accumulated from forestry for long periods (i.e. 5-10 years) so has some flexibility to pick the time to sell.

Project Cost

Medium

Investment would only proceed on a strong business case including a trading strategy for carbon.

Forestry: Manuka Honey Plantings

Honey yield per hectare is lower than forecast

Medium

The projected investment returns are based on MAF apiary data and based on these the project will deliver returns well above HBRC’s 7% Internal Rate of Return hurdle rate. Even with a reduction in honey yield of 30% the project would still deliver an investment return of about 7%.

Forestry:  Harvesting

Price for logs is less than forecast

Low

Commodity markets such as timber are cyclical; however, there is the option to defer harvest. Because HBRC’s total harvestable forest asset is a small proportion of its overall investments, the impact of lower harvest prices (to the extent they cannot be managed by deferred harvest) is not believed to be significant.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Investment Company Risks

Table 5 summarises the principal investment risks in respect of the proposed projects of the investment company.

 

Table 5: Investment Company Risks

Investment

Assumptions

Risk to Assumption

Level of Uncertainty

Reasons and Financial Effects of Uncertainty

Water Storage and Harvesting (Ruataniwha Plains and Ngaruroro)

 

Farmer take up

Lower than planned

Medium

This Long Term Plan provides for funding of operating losses equating to a 51% share for any shortfall in HBRIC Ltd ability to service interest on the debt raised to fund these investments.

This Plan provides for an “investment risk reserve” which equates to a reduction of 1.50% from the interest charged in the investment model on holding costs to be paid by HBRIC Ltd to HBRC for its borrowings.  This reserve will continue until the projects become operational.  The provision of this reserve is considered to be prudent given the significant risks on farmer uptake and the effect this could have on HBRIC’s ability to provide a commercial return on funds invested by Council. This reserve will also provide funding if the interest rates used to calculate holding costs paid by HBRC are below those levels budgeted.

Investment by co-shareholders

Low investment interest

Low

Significant risk however will be managed through the years of the LTP by a proactive approach to relationship building with prospective investors in the project.

Project cost

Project cost rises

Medium

Significant effect, however this will be mitigated against by strong project management by the Board of HBRIC Ltd. The estimate of the potential effects of the uncertainty is best illustrated by stating that for every $10M increase in project costs, HBRC will need to invest a further $5M if we are to retain our 51% investment. A commercial return would need to be achieved on any increase in project costs within a reasonable time period.

Project does not proceed

Not commercially viable

Medium

The ‘investment risk reserve’ covers the interest differential between interest charged on project advances and interest estimated to be earned from bank deposits.

Rail - Port Hub

Demand from PONL and its clients

Demand falls

Low

 

Project cost

Project cost rises

Medium

Commercial return would need to be achievable on any increased project cost. 

Market conditions steady

Rental yields fall

Medium

Would only proceed with a sound commercial proposal which would include a long term lease commitment from PONL.

Port of Napier

Dividend

Port of Napier Dividends are higher or lower than forecast

Low

The level of uncertainty relating to the Port of Napier Dividend has been substantially reduced as a result of the change in calculation method. The new method of calculation of the dividend by way of a return of 8% on shareholder’s funds, with HBRC being paid 70% of that return, is deemed to be more certain than the previous calculation method of 75% of Net Profit After Tax.

 

Funding Risks

Table 6: Funding Risks

Funding Type

Assumption

Risk to Assumption

Level of Uncertainty

Reasons and Financial Effects of Uncertainty

Sale of residual cash flows for Napier leasehold

The maximum value will be received on the sale

Demand for this product from the market at a value acceptable to HBRC.

Low to Medium

There would be a loss of interest of between $42,000 and $75,000 for each $1M of reduced sale realisation value.

Other Risks

Table 7: Other Risks

Assumption

Risk to Assumption

Level of Uncertainty

Reasons and Financial Effects of Uncertainty

Inflation

Inflation is higher or lower than forecast

Medium

Inflation is affected by external economic factors, most of which are outside of HBRC’s control and influence. The estimate of the potential effects of the uncertainty is best illustrated by stating that for 2013/14 a move in these projections by plus or minus 0.5% would result in either an under or over provision for external expenditure of $102,000 and for employment costs of $59,000.

Interest Rates on Borrowings

Interest rates are higher or lower than forecast

High – especially in later years of the plan

The majority of the borrowing programme proposed in this plan is to provide funding to the Investment Company. As the borrowing programme for HBRC is expected to grow substantially in the later years of the plan, any movement in interest rates are expected to have a major effect on HBRC’s interest expense. This plan assumes that the Investment Company will pay for advances at HBRC’s borrowing rate. The effect of any interest rate movements on the borrowing programme can best be illustrated by stating that a 0.5% movement either up or down from the assumed levels of interest rates in this plan would result in an annual exposure of plus or minus $81,000 for 2012/13 and $305,000 in 2021/22.

Interest Rates on Deposits

Interest rates are higher or lower than forecast

Medium

Short and long term HBRC cash investments are estimated to be in the order of $40M at the start of this plan, therefore a 0.5% movement either up or down from the assumed levels of interest rates in this plan would result in an annual exposure of plus or minus $225,000 in 2012/13 and $161,000 in 2021/22.

Occurrence of Natural Disaster

A natural disaster/flood event occurs which damages Council’s property, plant and equipment

Medium

Call on commercial insurance, Local Authority Protection Programme and Government funding through the National Civil Defence Recovery Plan. The use of reserves is also available to HBRC as required.

Reporting on Significant Changes

The Local Government Act 2002, Section 95 (5)(b) requires that subsequent Annual Plans identify any variation from the financial statements and funding impact statement which are included in the Council's Long Term Plan for the year of that plan. For the purposes of this reporting, the following material and significance levels will apply:

·      Where the financial impact of any change exceeds 1.5% of total budgeted expenditure in that year

·      Other items of change where it is considered to be of interest to the public as the principal users of the plan. These items would include establishing new land drainage and flood control schemes, new projects, changes in future direction etc.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Forecast Financial Statements

Introduction

The following pages cover the forecast financial statements, notes and other financial information required by clauses 18-22 of Schedule 10 to the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA).  The significant forecasting assumptions required for the LTP by clause of 17 of Schedule 10 to the LGA are also included.

These financial statements, notes and other financial information comply with Financial Reporting Standard No. 42, “Prospective Financial Statements”.

As required by section 100(1) of the LGA, HBRC has ensured that each year’s projected operating revenues are set at a level sufficient to meet that year’s projected operating expenses.

The Nature of Prospective Information Presented

The prospective financial information has been presented to comply with the requirements of sections 95 of the LGA in relation to the Annual Plan for the financial year ending on 30 June 2015.  The statements and information may not be appropriate for purposes other than those disclosed above.

The prospective information presented is based on the best information that could reasonably be expected to be available at the time of preparation.  While every care has been taken in the preparation of the prospective financial information presented, the actual results are likely to vary from the information presented and the variations may be material.


Authorisation and Responsibility

The prospective financial information presented was authorised for issue by HBRC on 25 June 2014.

HBRC Councillors and management accept responsibility for the prospective financial information presented including the appropriateness of the assumptions underlying the information and all other disclosures.

Other Disclosures

There is no intention to update the prospective financial information presented after the approval of the Annual Plan on 25 June 2013.

Comparative Information Linkages

The Prospective Statement of Changes in Equity and Prospective Cash Flow Statement closing positions for 2012/13 do not link to opening positions for 2013/14.  This is because the 2013/14 Annual Plan prospective financial statements were finalised before the 2012/13 Annual Report.

The 2014/15 forecast opening positions are based on the 2012/13 Annual Report closing positions after adjusting for the 2013/14 Annual Plan forecast results and cash flows.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 


 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Financial Metrics

The LTP set out a number of financial metrics to be monitored.  The 2014-15 LTP metrics have been compared to the 2014-15 Annual Plan metrics in the table below along with an explanation of any major difference.  Comparison between the 2013-14 LTP metrics and actual 2013-14 metrics will be completed in the 2013-14 Annual Report.

 

Trends of Other  Financial Metrics

LTP

Ann Pln

Variance

Explanation

Metric

2014-15

2014-15

 

 

Operating Surplus Margin:

(This shows the annual surplus generated from business as usual activities being available to fund capital expenditure, to meet interest and principal repayments on debt and/or set aside to meet future contingencies.  The metric for HBRC is negative because a third of HBRC’s revenue is generated from investment income which is not included in this calculation.  This metric therefore shows HBRC’s exposure to the assumption that investment incomes will continue into the future.)

 

(37.1%)

 

(41.5%)

 

4.4%

 

The operating surplus margin has decreased due to increased operating expenses.

Net Surplus Margin:

(This metric shows the percentage of income retained by HBRC after meeting all operating costs for the year).

 

8.3%

 

1.0%

 

(7.3%)

 

The net surplus margin has decreased due lower than expected interest revenue and increased operating expenses from unspent 2013-14 budgets that were carried forward to 2014-15.

Return on Investment Assets:

(This metric shows the amount of interest and dividend income generated each year by HBRC’s total investment asset base).

 

4.5%

 

4.2%

 

(0.3%)

 

The return on investment assets has decreased due to lower than expected interest rates offset by larger dividends from HBRIC Ltd

Rates to Total Revenue:

(This metric shows the percentage of HBRC’s total revenue that is collected through rates).

 

36.4%

 

39.7%

 

3.3%

 

Rates to total revenue have increased due to a slightly higher rate take combined with a substantial reduction in overall income

General Rates to Total Rates:

(This metric shows the percentage of HBRC’s total rates revenue that is collected through general rates).

 

17.8%

 

18.1%

 

0.3%

 

General rates to total rates have increased due to a natural increase in ratepayers due to subdivisions etc.

Capex to Depreciation:

(This metric indicates the rate at which HBRC is renewing/replacing its existing fixed assets.  For HBRC this rate is high as significant expenditure is proposed in the LTP 2012-22 to be spent on flood and drainage schemes, the majority of these assets not being depreciable).  Further, in 2012-13 it is proposed to spend $1.3m on HBRC’s Dalton Street Office and Operations Group accommodation.

 

125%

 

183%

 

58%

 

Capex to Depreciation has increased due to additional capital spending on systems integration projects for regulatory software, an increase in motor vehicles and plant due to timing on fleet replacements as well as unspent capital spending from 2013-14 year being carried forward to 2014-15.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

Trends of Other  Financial Metrics

LTP

Ann Pln

Variance

Explanation

Metric

2014/15

2014/15

 

 

Capex to Total Cash Payments:

(This metric shows the proportion of total cash payments that has been spent on fixed assets).

 

3.4%

 

5.9%

 

2.5%

 

Capex to total cash payments has significantly increased due to additional capital spending on systems integration projects for regulatory software, an increase in motor vehicles and plant due to timing on fleet replacements as well as unspent capital spending from 2013-14 year being carried forward to 2014-15.

 

 

 

 

 

Finance Expense (including lease annuity) to Total Operating Expenditure

 

 

8.6%

 

7.3%

 

1.3%

Finance expenses to total operating expenditure has reduced due to the reduction in annuity expenses on the leasehold cash flows.  The value of cash flows to be sold to an investor have reduced as a result of greater than expected freeholding and therefore less payment/fees will be paid to the investor.

Finance Expense (excluding lease annuity) to Total Operating Expenditure

 

 

3.4%

 

3.6%

 

0.2%

Finance Expense (excluding lease annuity) of external public debt to operating expenditure has remained consistent with the LTP.

 

Debt to Debt Plus Equity

 

14.7%

 

11.3%

 

(3.4%)

Debt to debt plus equity has decreased as the LTP included the ACC annuity of $61 million in the debt figure which has now been reduced to $37 million as a result of increased sell downs before the ACC deal took place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Rate Movements

The 2012-22 Long Term Plan (LTP) committed to hold rates increases to 4% in each of its first two years and at rate levels below 4% for the remaining years.  The 2014-15 Annual Plan proposes to increase the rates by 5.86% from the 2013-14 actual rate figures due to the fact that the 2013-14 Annual Plan reduced the rates increase to 2.8%.  Refer to “Explanatory Notes of Changes between Year 3 of the LTP 2012-22 and Annual Plan 2014-15” section for further explanation for the change.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Local Government (Financial Reporting) Regulations 2011

Introduction

The following information is presented for compliance with Local Government (Financial Reporting) Regulations 2011.  In accordance with the regulations, the information presented is incomplete (in particular, the information presented does not include depreciation and internal transactions such as overheads) and it is not prepared in compliance with generally accepted accounting practice.  It should not be relied upon for any other purpose than compliance with the Local Government (Financial Reporting) Regulations 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Introduction

This Funding Impact Statement sets out the impact that the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council's Revenue and Financing Policy has on ratepayers.

The Revenue and Financing Policy clearly identifies beneficiaries of HBRC activities paying for the cost of those activities by target rates or direct charges, whichever is the most efficient administratively.

Public benefit is funded through a combination of investment income and general rates. Private benefit is funded through targeted rates and/or direct charges.

At various points of the Funding Impact Statement, a level of rates or charges is specified. These indicative figures are included to give ratepayers an estimate of what their level of rates is likely to be in the current year. These figures may not be the actual level of rates that will be assessed in the coming year because the actual figure will not be known until the Council’s rating information database is finalised.

All the estimated rates and levels of rates included in this statement are GST inclusive.

There is no provision for the payment of rates from lump sum contributions, except for the early repayment of Clean Heat loans.

Due dates for payment of rates

The rates are due and payable on or after 1 October 2014. Pursuant to Section 57 of the Local Government (Ratine) Act 2002, a penalty charge of 10% will be imposed on the current rates remaining unpaid as at 1 February 2015.

When a fixed amount is set for each property, whether it be a Uniform Annual General Charge (UAGC) for general funding rates or a Uniform Annual Charge (UAC) for Targeted Rates, then a fixed amount is charged for each separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit. Therefore, units in a rest home, retail shops in a shopping complex, and additional farm houses are charged with separate UAGCs or UACs.

 

Where two or more rating units are contiguously joined, owned by the same ratepayer and used for the same purpose, or a Farm property with separately titled paddocks, then only one UAGC or UAC will be payable.

HBRC’s contention is that this mix of rating bases better reflects the benefits delivered to the general community while addressing some of the rate level volatility experienced by those ratepayers in the community whose land values have increased by more than the average.

HBRC directly collects rates for all rating units contained within its boundaries and where specific rates are set across District/City boundaries on a value basis, then the rates are set on Estimate of Projected Valuation (equalisation) which recognises annual movement of values across the region for each territorial authority.

Section 21 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 requires that Uniform Annual General Charges and targeted rates set on a uniform basis are not to exceed 30% of the total revenue from all rates sought by Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) for the budgeted year. The rates making up this category amount to 23.28% of Council’s total rates in 2014-15 and are therefore within the limits prescribed by the Act.

Inspection and objection to HBRC's Rating Information Database

The Rating Information Database (RID) is available for inspection at HBRC offices at 159 Dalton Street Napier and on Council’s website www.hbrc.govt.nz. Ratepayers have the right to inspect the RID records and can object to their rating liability on the grounds set out in the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002.

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

Explanation of Rating Method

 

Types of Rates

Groups of Activities Funded

Types of land to be Rated

(Local Government (Rating) Act, Schedule 2)

Basis of Rating

(Local Govt (Rating) Act, Schedule 3)

General Funding Rates

 

General Rates

 

 

­ Regulation

­ Governance & Community Engagement (Climate Change)

All Rateable Rating Units within the region.

 

Land Value

Uniform Annual General Charges

 

 

­ Regulation

­ Governance & Community Engagement

All Rateable Rating Units within the region.

 

Fixed Amount (Refer Note 1)

Targeted Rates

 

Subsidised Public Transport

Public Transport System and Total Mobility programme for disabled persons.

Those Rating Units within the urban areas of Napier, Hastings & Havelock North including Clive Township but excluding Bay View.

Land Value

Heretaunga Plains Control Scheme

Catchment Works

­ Direct Benefit F1

 

­ Indirect Benefit F2

­ Rating Units receiving direct benefit within Napier City and Hastings District from flood control measures.

­ All Rating Units within Napier City and Hastings District.

(For categories of the rateable land refer to Section 12 of the Asset Management Plan available at www.hbrc.govt.nz)

Capital Value

Upper Tukituki Catchment Control

Catchment Works

 

All Ratings Units in Central Hawke’s Bay District on a graduated basis.  Also, Rating Units on the southern boundary of Hastings District Council.

(For categories of the rateable land refer to Section 12 of the Asset Management Plan available at www.hbrc.govt.nz)

Land Value

Central & Southern Rivers & Streams

Catchment Works

 

All Ratings Units in the region excluding Wairoa District.

Capital Value

Wairoa River & Stream

Catchment Works

 

All Rating Units in the Wairoa District.

Capital Value

Various Stream & Drainage Schemes

Catchment Works

 

Rating Units identified receiving benefit from specific stream and drainage works.  Some on graduated basis.

(For categories of the rateable land refer to Section 12 of the Asset Management Plan available at www.hbrc.govt.nz)

Land Value Area and Fixed Amount (Refer Note 1)

 

 

Continued:  Explanation of Rating Method

 

Types of Rates

Groups of Activities Funded

Types of land to be Rated

(Local Government (Rating) Act, Schedule 2)

Basis of Rating

(Local Govt (Rating) Act, Schedule 3)

Targeted Rates

 

Animal and Plant Pest Control

 

Biosecurity

 

 

Regional Animal Pest Management Strategy

All rateable rural land containing 4.0469 hectares in the region excluding Rating Units greater than 200 hectares where more than 90% of the land is covered in indigenous vegetation which will be zero rated.

A differential rate will be applied to those Rating Units that have between 40 and 400 hectares where more than 75% of the land is covered in production forestry, also any production forestry Rating Units over 400 hectares.

 

Area

Bovine TB Vector Control

 

Bovine TB Vector Control

 

All rateable rural land containing 4.0469 hectares in the region.

 

Area

Plant Pest Strategy

 

Regional Plant Pest Management Strategy

 

All rateable rural land containing 4.0469 hectares in the region excluding Rating Units greater than 200 hectares where more than 90% of the land is covered in indigenous vegetation which will be zero rated.

 

Area

Healthy Homes - Clean Heat Financial Assistance

 

Management of the scheme to encourage the replacement of open fire or wood burners with more efficient form of heating and where necessary the installation of insulation.

 

All Rating Units in Napier and Hastings within the affected airshed.

 

Land Value

Clean Heat & Insulation Loans

 

Repayment of loans to ratepayers to insulate homes and replace open fires or non-compliant woodburners.

Those ratepayers who have opted for a loan to be repaid over 10 years with interest as a fixed amount through a Targeted Differential rate.

 

Dollar Amount

 

Continued:  Explanation of Rating Method

 

Types of Rates

Groups of Activities Funded

Types of land to be Rated

(Local Government (Rating) Act, Schedule 2)

Basis of Rating

(Local Govt (Rating) Act, Schedule 3)

Economic Development Rate

 

To fund economic and tourism development in the region.

 

30% of the total rates are funded by the Commercial/Industrial Rating Units based on the Capital Value.

The remaining 70% is collected from residential and rural Rating Units as an Uniform Annual Charge.

The Wairoa District ratepayers’ contribution is limited to 5% of the total rate.

 

Capital Value

 

 

Fixed Amount (Refer to Note 1)

Emergency Management

 

Funding of the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management (CDEM) Group Office to manage the provision of effective CDEM consistent with the CDEM Act 2002.

 

All Rating Units in the region with the exception of Rangitikei and Taupo districts.

 

Fixed Amount (Refer to Note 1)

 

Note 1: A Uniform Annual General Charge (UAGC) or Uniform Annual Charge (UAC) is set on each separately used or inhabited part of a rating unit within the region.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

 

Details of Rates Calculated within each District and City

General and Uniform Annual General Rates

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 value per property

2013/14 Rate

General Rate

 

Napier City

Land Value

0.00825

$368,659

$8.25

$318,424

 

Hastings District

Land Value

0.00839

$638,648

$8.39

$546,530

 

Wairoa District

Land Value

0.00848

$84,173

$8.48

$75,904

 

Central H B District

Land Value

0.00877

$203,153

$8.77

$176,847

 

Taupo District

Land Value

0.00978

$5,788

$9.78

$4,976

 

Rangitikei District

Land Value

0.01682

$2,823

$16.82

$2,681

 

Estimate of Projected Valuation

 

0.00838

$1,303,244

 

$1,125,362

 

 

 Uniform Annual General Rate

 

Napier City

Fixed Amount

26,370

28.41

$749,159

28.41

$669,659

 

Hastings District

Fixed Amount

31,116

28.41

$884,005

28.41

$783,457

 

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

5,182

28.41

$147,220

28.41

$136,894

 

Central H B District

Fixed Amount

6,352

28.41

$180,460

28.41

$157,735

 

Taupo District

Fixed Amount

18

28.41

$511

28.41

$613

 

Rangitikei District

Fixed Amount

4

28.41

$113

28.41

$153

 

TOTAL

 

69,042

 

$1,961,468

 

$1,748,511

 

 

 


 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 land value per property

2013/14 Rate

SUBSIDISED PUBLIC TRANSPORT

Napier City

Land Value

0.02632

$1,028,162

$26.32

$1,014,485

Hastings District

Land Value

0.02678

$816,726

$26.78

$768,015

 

Estimate of Projected Valuation

 

0.02675

$1,844,888

$1,782,500

 

 

RIVER CONTROL

Benefit

 

Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme

Napier City

Capital Value

Direct

0.01163

$752,708

$11.63

$725,077

Napier City

Capital Value

Indirect

0.00284

$275,931

$2.84

$266,961

 

Hastings District

Capital Value

Direct

0.01169

$887,518

$11.69

$843,023

 

Hastings District

Capital Value

Indirect

0.00285

$427,023

$2.85

$405,082

 

Estimate of Project Valuation

Direct

0.01166

 

Estimate of Project Valuation

Indirect

0.00284

 

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

$2,343,180

 

$2,240,143

Upper Tukituki Catchment Control Scheme

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F1   100

0.62728

$131,090

$627.28

$124,362

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F2    75

0.47046

$194,266

$470.46

$186,928

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F3    50

0.31364

$92,161

$313.64

$87,908

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F4    25

0.15682

$121,872

$156.82

$115,142

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F5    10

0.06273

$72,116

$62.73

$68,482

 

Central H B District

Land Value

F6      1

0.00627

$85,107

$6.27

$80,656

 

Central H B District

Land Value

U1   25

0.15682

$36,810

$156.82

$35,308

 

Central H B District

Land Value

U2   15

0.09409

$5,452

$94.09

$5,172

 

Central H B District

Land Value

U3   10

0.06273

$13,770

$62.73

$13,105

 

Central H B District

Land Value

U4     1

0.00627

$7,620

$6.27

$7,258

 

Hastings District

Land Value

F5    10

0.06530

$1,333

$65.30

$1,183

 

Hastings District

Land Value

F6      1

0.00653

$2,687

$6.53

$2,387

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

$764,285

 

$727,891

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City 

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 capital value per property

2013/14 Rate

RIVER CONTROL

Benefit

 

Wairoa River & Streams Scheme

 

Wairoa District

Capital Value

0.01041

$174,116

$10.41

$165,482

 

 

Central & Southern Area Rivers & Streams

 

Napier City

Capital Value

0.000875

$85,293

$0.87

$83,778

 

Hastings District

Capital Value

0.000879

$131,873

$0.87

$127,065

 

Central HB District

Capital Value

0.000905

$33,758

$0.90

$32,753

 

Taupo District

Capital Value

0.000980

$767

$0.98

$741

 

Rangitikei District

Capital Value

0.001463

$345

$1.46

$359

 

Estimate of Projected Valuation

 

0.000877

$252,036

$244,696

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STREAMS AND DRAINS

 

 

 

 

 

Napier, Meeanee & Puketapu

Napier City

Land Value

Urban

0.02847

$726,488

$28.01

$688,048

Napier City

Land Value

Industrial

0.11387

$182,112

$112.05

$172,762

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.02847

$13,925

$28.50

$13,678

TOTAL

 

 

 

$922,525

 

$874,488

 

 

 

 

­    Karamu & Tributaries

Hastings District

Land Value

Urban

0.03661

$846,989

$36.65

$809,442

Hastings District

Land Value

Industrial

0.14645

$310,377

$146.61

$292,811

TOTAL

 

 

 

$1,157,366

 

$1,102,253

 


 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City 

 

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 capital value per property

2013/14 Rate

 

STREAMS AND DRAINS

 

 

 

 

 

 

­     Raupare Enhancement

 

Hastings District

 

Area

 

1097 hectares

 

12.65

$13,877

$12.65/hectare

 

$13,877

 

­    Raupare Twyford

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.0848

$199,589

$84.89

$192,371

 

­     Haumoana

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.1051

$141,774

$105.22

$136,980

 

­     Tutaekuri, Waimate & Moteo

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.1585

$212,165

$158.69

$202,062

 

­     Pakowhai Brookfields

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.1980

$144,656

$198.21

$139,093

 

­     Puninga

Hastings District

Land Value

Rural

0.2282

$79,336

$237.81

$76,653

 

­     Brookfields Awatoto

Napier City

Land Value

Urban

0.2042

$101,945

$200.93

$98,251

 

 

Napier City

Land Value

Industrial

0.8168

$56,100

$803.73

$54,449

 

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

$949,442

$913,736

 

 

 

­     Muddy Creek

Hastings District

Land Value

Urban

0.10469

$206,570

$104.81

$203,619

 

Hastings District

Land Value

Industrial

0.41876

$37,899

$419.23

$34,888

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

                $244,469

$238,507

 

 

 

­     Karamu Drainage Maintenance

Hastings District

Fixed Amount

5,569

10.55

$58,764

10.55

$55,966

 

­     Karamu Enhancement

Hastings District

Fixed Amount

5,569

9.86

$54,935

9.86

$52,319

 

 

­     Poukawa Drainage Special Rating Scheme

Hastings District

Land Value

PO1

0.66022

$31,877

$660.22

$26,564

 

Hastings District

Land Value

PO2

0.11003

$1,664

$100.03

$1,393

 

Hastings District

Land Value

PO3

0.02200

$659

$22.01

$542

 

TOTAL

 

 

$34,200

$28,499

 

 

­     Porangahau Flood Control

Central HB District

Land Value

0.0144

$41,602

$14.40

$39,621

 

­     Maraetotara Flood Maintenance

Hastings District

Capital Value

0.0975

$11,744

$9.75

$11,402

 

­     Kairakau Community Scheme

 

Central HB District

 

Uniform Charge

 

80 Rating Units

1,205.90

$9,647

$120.59

 

$9,421

 


 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City 

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 capital value per property

2013/14 Rate

DRAINAGE SCHEMES

Paeroa Drainage Scheme Special Rating Area

Wairoa District

Area Basis

P1

6734.97

$13,349

$67.35

$13,349

Wairoa District

Area Basis

P2

4377.73

$5,865

$43.78

$5,864

Wairoa District

Area Basis

P3

3030.74

$1,681

$30.31

$1,681

Wairoa District

Area Basis

P4

2357.24

$1,442

$23.57

$1,442

Wairoa District

Area Basis

P5

336.75

$746

$3.37

$746

TOTAL

 

$23,082

 

$23,082

 

Ohuia Whakaki Drainage Rating Scheme

Wairoa District

Area Basis

A

12373.45

$36,656

$123.73

$35,078

Wairoa District

Area Basis

B

9898.76

$8,553

$98.98

$8,185

Wairoa District

Area Basis

C

7424.07

$5,223

$74.24

$4,998

Wairoa District

Area Basis

D

3712.04

$13,122

$37.12

$12,557

Wairoa District

Area Basis

E

1237.35

$2,869

$12.37

$2,746

TOTAL

 

$66,424

 

$63,564

 

Upper Makara Stream Catchment Special Rating Scheme

Central HB District

Area Basis

A

14394.9

$7,803

$143.94

$7,539

Central HB District

Area Basis

B

11515.92

$21,861

$115.16

$21,122

Central HB District

Area Basis

C

9356.69

$33,140

$93.56

$32,019

Central HB District

Area Basis

D

5038.22

$6,645

$50.38

$6,421

Central HB District

Area Basis

E

719.75

$16,609

$7.19

$16,047

Central HB District

Area Basis

F

287.90

$13,115

$2.88

$12,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$99,173

 

$95,819

 

 

 

 


 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount  per Hectare

2013/14 Rate

DRAINAGE SCHEMES

Esk River & Whirinaki Stream Maintenance Scheme

Hastings District

Area Basis

E1

3922.4893

$8,808

$39.22

$9,040

Hastings District

Area Basis

E2

1623.0499

$2,396

$16.23

$2,510

Hastings District

Area Basis

R11

3932.8367

$1,214

$39.32

$1,291

Hastings District

Area Basis

R12

13371.3512

$623

$133.71

$623

Hastings District

Area Basis

R13

43231.250

$623

$432.31

$622

TOTAL

 

 

 

$13,665

 

$14,087

 

Hastings District

Area Basis

W1

17257.124

$5,330

$172.57

$5,099

Hastings District

Area Basis

W2

11066.00

$515

$110.66

$515

Hastings District

Area Basis

W3

3577.70

$515

$35.77

$515

Hastings District

Area Basis

W4

19025.50

$2,888

$190.02

$2,700

Hastings District

Area Basis

W5

369.2240

$147

$3.69

$147

Hastings District

Area Basis

W6

4460.606

$147

$44.60

$147

Hastings District

Area Basis

W7

1582.792

$147

$15.83

$147

TOTAL

 

 

$9,689

 

$9,270

Opoho Drainage/Stream

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

A

66

$13,848

$13,848

$0

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

B

25

$5,164

$5,164

$0

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

C

10

$2,065

$2,065

$0

TOTAL

 

 

$21,077

 

$0

 

 


 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount  per Hectare

2013/14 Rate

DRAINAGE SCHEMES

 

Te Ngarue Stream Flood Protection Scheme

Hastings District

Area Basis

TN

2916.28

$2,773

$29.16

$2,773

Hastings District

Area Basis

TN1

18431.79

$155

$184.31

$155

TOTAL

 

 

$2,928

 

$2,928

 

Kopuawhara Stream Flood Control Maintenance Scheme

Wairoa District

Area Basis

A

15351.4

$1,875

$153.51

$1,821

Wairoa District

Area Basis

B

6140.5

$3,804

$61.41

$3,693

Wairoa District

Area Basis

C

3070.2

$2,225

$30.70

$2,160

Wairoa District

Area Basis

D

767.57

$772

$7.67

$749

TOTAL

 

 

$8,676

 

$8,423

 

 


 

 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City 

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount 4.047 hectare (10acre) property

2013/14 Rate

BIOSECURITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Plant Pest Strategy

 

Napier City

Area Basis

4,474

45.62

$2,041

$1.85

$1,963

 

Hastings District

Area Basis

365,883

45.62

$166,916

$1.85

$160,467

 

Wairoa District

Area Basis

270,247

45.62

$123,287

$1.85

$118,557

 

Central HB District

Area Basis

302,866

45.62

$138,167

$1.85

$132,867

 

Taupo District

Area Basis

21,900

45.62

$9,991

$1.85

$9,608

 

Rangitikei District

Area Basis

17,912

45.62

$8,171

$1.85

$7,858

 

TOTAL

 

983,282

 

$448,573

$431,320

 

 

Regional Animal Pest Management Strategy

 

Napier City

Area Basis

4,475

149.77

$6,702

$6.06

$6,464

 

Hastings District

Area Basis

300,027

149.77

$449,350

$6.06

$431,961

 

Wairoa District

Area Basis

207,503

149.77

$310,777

$6.06

$299,759

 

Central HB District

Area Basis

295,417

149.77

$442,446

$6.06

$426,759

 

Taupo District

Area Basis

7,996

149.77

$11,976

$6.06

$11,551

 

Rangitikei District

Area Basis

17,912

149.77

$26,827

$6.06

$25,875

 

TOTAL

 

833,330

$1,248,078

$1,202,369

 

 

Bovine TB Vector Control

 

Napier City

Area Basis

4,426

59.33

$2,626

$2.40

$2,537

 

Hastings District

Area Basis

392,528

59.33

$232,887

$2.40

$224,996

 

Wairoa District

Area Basis

275,758

59.33

$163,607

$2.40

$158,063

 

Central HB District

Area Basis

302,978

59.33

$179,757

$2.40

$173,666

 

Taupo District

Area Basis

34,922

59.33

$20,719

$2.40

$20,017

 

Rangitikei District

Area Basis

17,912

59.33

$10,627

$2.40

$10,266

 

TOTAL

 

1,028,524

$610,223

$589,545

 

 


 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City 

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount 4.047 hectare (10acre) property

2013/14 Rate

BIOSECURITY

Pest Control - Forestry

 

Napier City

Area Basis

0

 

 

 

Hastings District

Area Basis

65,998

50.6

$33,395

$2.05

$34,322

 

Wairoa District

Area Basis

62,744

50.6

$31,748

$2.05

$31,748

 

Central HB District

Area Basis

7,307

50.6

$3,697

$2.05

$3,678

 

Taupo District

Area Basis

13,903

50.6

$7,035

$2.05

$7,035

 

Rangitikei District

Area Basis

 

 

TOTAL

 

149,952

 

$75,876

 

$76,783

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 land value per property

2013/14 Rate

CLEAN HEAT  &  SOLAR HOT WATER SCHEME

­     Healthy Homes

Napier City

Land Value

0.00859

$352,895

$8.59

$355,913

(Clean Heat Financial Assistance)

 

Hastings District

 

Land Value

0.00874

$317,744

$8.74

 

$314,726

 

Estimate of Projected Valuations

 

 

0.00873

$670,639

$670,639

 

 

­     Rates to repay loans to homeowners for clean heat, insulation and Solar Hot Water Scheme

$10 per $100 loan

$10

$10.00 per $100 loan

 

 


 

 

Details of Targeted Rates Calculated within each District and City

Groups of Activities / Rate Type

Districts

Rates set on

Differentials

Calculation Factor

Estimated Rates Revenue 2014-15

Estimated Amount of $100,000 land value per property

2013/14 Rate

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

 

Napier City

Fixed Amount

23728

17.53

$415,952

$17.53

$393,170

 

Hastings District

Fixed Amount

28757

17.53

$503,877

$17.53

$475,804

 

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

4930

14.00

$69,020

$14.00

$64,467

 

Central HB District

Fixed Amount

6023

17.53

$105,583

$17.53

$99,723

 

Taupo District

Fixed Amount

17

17.53

$298

$17.53

$300

 

Rangitikei District

Fixed Amount

4

17.53

$70

$17.53

$66

 

TOTAL

 

63459

 

$1,094,800

 

$1,033,530

 

 

 

Napier City

Capital Value

Commercial/

0.01308

$212,509

$13.08

$201,607

 

Hastings District

Capital Value

Industrial

0.01315

$230,867

$13.15

$215,855

 

Wairoa District

Capital Value

0.01592

$9,180

$15.92

$9,357

 

Central HB District

Capital Value

0.1353

$16,644

$13.53

$16,123

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

$469,200

 

$442,942

 

 

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

 

Napier City

Fixed Amount

26370

14.84

$391,413

$14.84

$383,598

 

Hastings District

Fixed Amount

31116

14.84

$461,885

$14.84

$448,849

 

Wairoa District

Fixed Amount

5182

14.84

$94,287

$14.84

$90,355

 

Central HB District

Fixed Amount

6352

14.84

$76,924

$14.84

$78,417

 

TOTAL

 

69020

 

$1,024,509

 

$1,001,219

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 


Introduction

Section 36 of the Resource Management Act (RMA) enables local authorities to allocate fixed charges for various administrative and monitoring activities to specific resource users. These fixed charges can either be specific amounts or determined by charging scales.

There are five types of resource management charges and they relate to:

·      consent applications

·      compliance and monitoring

·      zone based water management

·      gravel extraction

·      contaminated sites.

1.    Charges Relating to Resource Consent Applications

(other than non-notified gravel extraction applications)

Charges for receiving, processing and deciding on applications for:

•     resource consents

•     certificates of compliance

•     changes to, cancellation of, or review of resource consent conditions

•     transfers of resource consents

shall comprise a fixed charge payable in advance (a deposit) and an additional charge payable once the application has been decided. An additional fixed charge will be required before notification, and the start of a hearing, if the application requires these processes.

Fixed Charges for Processing Resource Consent Applications

Tables 1 and 1a set out the fixed charges payable for processing resource consent applications. These fees are charged in accordance with Section 36(1)b of the RMA.


Table 1:  Fixed charges payable for processing resource consent applications

                  (other than Non-notified Gravel Extraction Applications -  see Table 3)

Item

Initial Fixed Fee - Payable upon Lodgment (excl GST)

Additional Charge - Payable subsequent to processing

­ Land use application for a bore permit where the application is made by a HBRC accredited driller.

­ Land use application for bore permit  where the application is not made by a HBRC accredited driller

­ $156

 

 

­ $350

 

­ N/A

 

 

­ N/A

 

Changes or cancellations of consent conditions

$500

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Review of conditions as specified in resource consents

$320

Based on actual and reasonable  costs1

Transfer a consent to another site

$400

Based on actual and reasonable costs 1

Extensions to lapsed dates for land use consents and onsite domestic waste water, less than 2m3 a day

$150

N/A

Extensions to lapsed dates

$200

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Transfer of resource consent (1 only, with transfer form completed and signed) to a new owner/occupier or change of name

$85

Based on actual and reasonable costs for non-standard process1

Transfer of resource consent (2 or more, with transfer form completed and signed) relating to the same property to a new owner/occupier or change of name

$110

Based on actual and reasonable costs  for non-standard process1

Section 36(7) of the RMA specifies that where a fixed charge has not been paid, Council need not perform the action to which the charge relates until it has been paid in full. HBRC can suspend processing an application until a fixed charge has been paid.

 


Table 1 continued:

Fixed charges payable for processing resource consent Applications

(other than Non-notified Gravel Extraction Applications - see Table 3 page 57)

Item

Initial Fixed Fee - Payable upon Lodgment (excl GST)

Additional Charge - Payable

subsequent to processing

Certificate of compliance:

­  Bore sealing

­  Other

 

­ no charge

­ $300

 

­ N/A

­ Based on actual & reasonable costs1

On-site wastewater system where the application is made in conjunction with an accredited designer on a low risk site

$350

N/A

Renewal of Category 1 domestic on-site wastewater consents (with a good compliance history, and a verified history of complete wastewater system maintenance servicing by an accredited installer/service agent).

$350

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Renewal of all other (Category 2) domestic on-site wastewater consents.

$350

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Confirmation of domestic on-site wastewater Permitted Activity status

$150

N/A

Other Individual resource consent application (including applications for ancillary activities)

$1000

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Table 1a:  Fixed Charges for Resource Consent Applications Requiring Notification or a Hearing

Application Type

Type of Fixed Fee (excl GST)

Additional Charge – Payable subsequent to processing

Initial Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee: Payable upon notification

Fixed fee: Payable 5 days before hearing

Individual resource consent application (including applications for ancillary activities)

 

$1000

 

$5000

 

$5000

 

Based on actual and reasonable costs1

Application processed as part of a catchment wide replacement process

 

$1000

 

$1500

 

$1500

 

Based on actual and reasonable costs3

Request for Independent Commissioner under s 100A

Fixed fee payable on requesting a Commissioner

Additional Charge -  Payable subsequent to processing

Fixed fee payable on requesting an independent commissioner

 

$3000 per commissioner

Based on actual and reasonable costs1 of additional cost incurred as a result of using an independent commissioner

 

 


Note 1: Actual and Reasonable Costs include time spent by staff in receiving, processing and deciding on the applications, hearing costs and any external disbursements (which shall include any external expert advice from consultants at cost).  Staff costs shall be calculated by multiplying the actual hours involved in receiving, processing and granting a consent by the hourly rates for the staff involved and adding any actual disbursements (as in Table 6); and adding any hearing costs and any costs of consultants and commissioned reports; and then subtracting the fixed charge that was paid in advance and any renewal fees that have been paid in advance.  The total calculated amount shall then, if necessary, be adjusted to reflect HBRC’s actual and reasonable costs having regard to the factors referred to in section 36(4) of the RMA and any relevant discounts. (This does not apply to applications which are not subject to additional charges or refunds).

Note 2: Where a bore field consent is issued for 3 or more bores, bore inspection and compliance administration shall be carried out at an hourly rate of $107 per hour.

Note 3: Where an activity requires multiple ancillary consents, and the application will be processed in a bundle, HBRC may require payment of only one initial fixed fee (deposit). The deposit shall be equal to the highest deposit required for any of the applications required, as per Table 1.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Additional Resource Consent Charges

In addition to these fixed charges, in most cases additional charges will be payable subsequent to processing, in accordance with Section 36(3) of the RMA.

Refunds

Except for applications for bore permits, minor administrative changes or cancellations, wastewater lapse date extensions and waste water consents made in conjunction with an accredited designer on a low risk site, a portion of the charge as set out in Tables 1 and 1a will be remitted if the actual cost of receiving, processing and deciding on the application is less than that already paid.

Hearings

HBRC is conscious of the cost that can be incurred by applicants when a resource consent application goes to a hearing. Therefore, the HBRC Hearings Committee will carefully assess the number of members who will participate in each hearing. The numbers involved in a hearing panel will usually range from three to a maximum of five. Where a hearing is required, the following charges shall be payable by the applicant, except for those costs incurred under s100A of the RMA:

·      actual meeting fee allowances at the rate approved by the Remuneration Authority, which is currently $80.00 an hour for each committee member other than the chairman who is paid $100.00 an hour, for each of the elected and tangata whenua appointed Committee members participating in the hearing (a six hour hearing with a hearing panel of three members would, therefore, incur meeting fee allowances for the hearing of $1,560);

·      actual mileage for committee members travelling to and from the hearing at the rate approved by the Remuneration Authority which is currently 77¢ a kilometre;

·      actual accommodation costs where it is cheaper for a committee member to stay overnight rather than return home;

·      actual meeting fee allowances for each of the committee members attending and participating in a formal site inspection, or any meeting subsequent to the hearing for formal deliberations;

·      mileage and accommodation costs associated with any formal site inspection or deliberation meetings;

·      actual costs (including disbursements) of any commissioner appointed by the Minister of Conservation’s representative;

·      the actual cost of staff attendance at a hearing (typically the Reporting Officer, hearings administrator, decision writer, relevant technical officers, and the Manager Consents or the Group Manager Resource Management);

·      the costs associated with the use of an independent hearing commissioner where the use of a commissioner has been occasioned by the application. The apportionment of costs when an independent hearing commissioner is requested by an applicant and/or submitters is noted below. Independent hearing commissioner costs will be calculated on an actual and reasonable basis and include fees for disbursements, reading the application material, site visit, hearing attendance, deliberations and drafting the decision.

·      the costs for photocopying, hall hire, catering (for the Panel and Decision Writer), and any administration services relating to hearings and deliberations will be recovered from the applicant on a case-by-case basis.

Independent Hearing Commissioners (s100A)

Applicants and/or submitters now have the ability to request that independent commissioners hear and decide publicly or limited notified applications. If an applicant makes the request, he or she is responsible for paying all costs associated with the use of the independent commissioner (as noted above). In accordance with s36(1)(ab), if one or more submitters requests an independent commissioner (and the applicant does not), those submitters are responsible for paying the extra costs incurred as a result of an independent commissioner being used (compared with the cost of using an elected member).

If a request is made for an independent commissioner, a fixed charge of $3000 a commissioner shall be paid at the time of the request. The actual and reasonable costs of the commissioner will also be charged as an additional charge in accordance with Section 36(3) of the RMA. HBRC decides which accredited independent commissioner(s) will be appointed to the Hearing Panel.

Hearing Decision Writers

The following charges shall be payable by the applicant except for those costs incurred under s 100A of the RMA:

·      The cost of the decision writer to attend the hearing and deliberations, and the decision writing time. Where the decision writer is an independent commissioner sitting as a panel member, the commissioner’s time to attend the hearing and deliberations will be charged at actual cost. However, the additional cost of using an independent consultant to write the decision will not be charged to the applicant. That is, the cost of the decision writing time will be charged to the applicant at the same rate as if a HBRC senior consent officer were undertaking the work.

·      Where the decision writer is an external consultant not sitting as a panel member any additional cost of the consultant’s time to attend the hearing and deliberations, and to write the decision will not be charged to the applicant. That is, the consultant’s time will be charged to the applicant at the same rate as if a HBRC senior consent officer were undertaking the work.

Charging for Consultants

·      Where the use of consultants is required to provide particular technical input to the consent process, and the use is occasioned by the application, the applicant will be responsible for the actual costs charged by the consultant.

·      Where the use of consultants has not been occasioned by an application, for example, where workloads are such that in-house expertise exists but is unavailable, the applicant will be charged for the use of the consultant at a rate capped at what would have been charged by HBRC’s in-house staff, as in Table 6.

Contribution to the costs of Commissioning Reports in accordance with Section 92(2)

HBRC may, from time to time, commission reports in accordance with Section 92(2) of the RMA, to determine the cumulative effects of an activity according to resource consent applications. Where the activity meets the following criteria, the HBRC may contribute to the costs of preparing the report to a maximum of 25%, up to a maximum of $5000. The HBRC’s contribution is at the discretion of the Group Manager, Resource Management, and the following criteria must be met for a discount to be considered:

·      The commissioned report must directly inform a plan change that the HBRC has committed to in the applicable Long Term Council Community Plan, and/or

·      The commissioned report must develop a method, or provide information that is applicable to sites beyond the immediate scope of the application, and

·      The commissioned report must contain information that is of benefit to the regional community as a whole.

2.    Charges to Holders of Resource Consents for Compliance and Impact Monitoring

Charges for the monitoring, administration and supervision of resource consents have been determined based on an estimate of the time for carrying out the inspection/s, assessment, reporting and administration associated with that monitoring.

Basic Charge

Consent holders whose consents require no more than a single annual inspection, and/or information return, and/or a single sampling undertaken by HBRC staff at the same time as the inspection will be charged as in Table 2. Table 2 does not include water takes with a water measuring device. Consent holders should check the conditions of the consent to determine whether sampling, water use or other information is required.

These charges are invoiced after inspection for one-off inspections, or at the end of the financial year for the consents that either have more than one inspection or ongoing monitoring throughout the year.

 

Table 2:  Monitoring Task (excluding water takes with water measuring device)

Fixed Basic Annual Charge (Excl GST)

Inspection and associated reporting and administration

$374

Inspection and associated reporting and administration of unmetered water takes

$290

Additional inspection, reporting and administration charges where a resource consent authorises groundwater takes from more than two wells

$68.40 - each additional well over 2.

Additional inspection, reporting and administration charges where additional consents under the same ownership and invoiced collectively, within 5km of each other, and able to be inspected on the same day

$227 - each additional consent.

Sampling time (sampling analysis will be at cost – see Table 4)

$107

Other information returns

$107

 

An additional charge will only be made to consent holders whose consents fall under the description for the basic charge, where extra compliance monitoring is required as a result of non-compliance with consent conditions or where extra time is spent following up suspected non-compliance where a consent holder has not supplied sufficient information to demonstrate compliance.

Water Measuring Device Charges

Charges to holders of resource consents to take water which require a water measuring device.

Table 2a:  Monitoring Water Takes with Water Measuring Devices

Annual Charge (Excl GST)

Sampling time (sampling analysis will be at cost – see Table 4)

$107

­ Water use returns & Audits –  Telemetered, Web/Text entry

­ Each additional water measuring device

­ $188

­ $30

­ Water use returns & Audits – Fax/Email/Standard Mail

­ Each additional water measuring device

­ $230

­ $63

Where water measuring devices do not meet HBRC’s approved devices criteria or are not installed by an approved installer, a full compliance audit will be undertaken.

$374

Non exercised consent

$80

 

An additional charge will only be made where extra compliance monitoring is required as a result of non-compliance with consent conditions or where water takes require additional monitoring or data returns over and above water use returns.

Monitoring of RMA Regulations

Where HBRC is required to monitor regulations under the Resource Management Act, a fixed charge of $107 for the first hour, and then additional charges based on actual and reasonable charges in Table 6 will be charged.

Actual and Reasonable Charge

Consent holders whose consents are subject to more than a single inspection a year and/or are subject to specific conditions, will be subject to the basic charge for the first inspection plus an additional charge based on the actual and reasonable costs to undertake the total annual monitoring activity.

For new consents, the consent holder will be advised of the likely annual monitoring costs when the consent is issued; thereafter the previous year’s monitoring costs will act as an indication of monitoring costs.

 

Additional Charges for Compliance Monitoring

Where an additional charge is to be made, this shall be calculated by multiplying the actual hours involved in undertaking monitoring of the consent by the hourly rate for the staff involved and adding any actual disbursements (as in Table 6).  The total calculated shall then, if necessary, be adjusted to reflect HBRC's actual and reasonable costs having regard to the factors referred to in section 36(4) of the RMA.

Incentives for Full Compliance

When a consent holder consistently achieves full compliance (a Grade 1 in two consecutive years) the frequency of on-site monitoring may be reduced. An annual inspection may reduce to once every two years or more if the scale of the activity and continued compliance warrants it. Quarterly inspections may reduce to six monthly inspections. The reduction in frequency will be at the discretion of the Manager of Compliance and Pollution Response. Random inspections may be undertaken at no cost to the consent holder to ensure continued compliance during the intervening period.

Monitoring of Domestic On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems Charges

Consent holders with an on-site wastewater treatment system type that is not on the HBRC’s Accredited Manufacturer list, and who do not have that system installed and serviced by a person or company on the Accredited Installer and Service Agent list will be subject to an annual monitoring cost of $374.

Consent holders with an on-site wastewater treatment system type that is on the HBRC’s accredited list and is installed and maintained by an accredited installer/service person or company will not be subject to routine compliance inspection fees.

Charges to holders of Resource Consents for Low Flow Monitoring

For holders of consents to take water where the abstraction is subject to low flow limits (directly or via gallery intake or wells), the cost of monitoring the low flows will be recovered for each water take subject to low flow restrictions (excluding any frost consents that are from the same take point as a irrigation consent, held in the same consent holders name):

·      A charge of $100 each primary consent (excl GST)

·      Should all of the fixed charge not be adequate to recover the  actual and reasonable costs associated with the entire  low flow monitoring program, an additional charge shall be added to all consents that are subject to the above low flow fixed charge, to recover the actual and reasonable costs incurred.

3.    Charges to holders of Resource Consents for Freshwater Management Research/Investigations and Monitoring (Zone Based Water Science Charges)

HBRC policy is to recover 35% of the total costs of investigation and monitoring of freshwater resources from holders of resource consents to take or dam water, or to discharge into water or onto land that may enter water. This recognises that while all residents of the region receive benefits from the sustainable management of our freshwater resources, resource users receive greater benefits than other land owners.

As part of the 2010/11 Annual Plan development HBRC consulted on the proposed charging with all existing current consent holders.

Allocation of Charges

The costs attributed under this charge are derived from the water investigation and monitoring projects with a proposed total cost to be recovered from consent holders of $1,180,000 excl GST in 2012-13. HBRC has agreed to directly subsidise $87,000 from the HBRC’s Sale of Land (non investment account). This subsidy ($87,000) will be available for years 2012-13 to 2014-15.

Costs are recovered from consent holders using a hybrid zone and regional based approach. Twenty per cent of the costs will be charged as a fixed portion (regional) and distributed uniformly among all current consent holders.  This is estimated to be $83, excluding GST, per consent for 2012-13. The remaining 80% of the costs (zone based) are separately attributed to the five major categories of consent holders (surface water takes, groundwater takes (stream depleting – hybrid SW/GW), hydro water takes, discharges to water and discharges to land consents). Charges are weighted against individual allocated volume m3 for water takes, and a pollution index score for discharge consents.

Charges are weighted against consented volumes not actual use, non-exercised/partially exercised consents do not receive dispensation. HBRC consents will be excluded from these charges.

The pollution index score for each discharge subtype will be reviewed yearly and preformed by a suitably qualified scientist.

Charges are struck against the current consent holder at the time of invoicing, no yearly apportioning will apply other than a 1 month discount for consents expiring 31 May. Charges lie where they fall. Charges are payable by the date specified on the invoice, the 2 to 5 year payment plan trialled in 2011-12 will not be offered due to the low take up rate.

Domestic on site wastewater consents from a single domestic dwelling are excluded from the charging. A 25% discount is struck against the irrigation component of dam fill consents, short term takes and discharges associated with a land use consent are excluded.

Compliance Monitoring, Administration Charges and Financial Contributions

Compliance monitoring, administration charges and financial contributions are based on the volume of gravel extracted; the source of the gravel; and its quality. The categories include:

·      inferior grade material (as determined by HBRC staff);

·      material extracted from above the confluence of the Tukipo and Mangaonuku River tributaries of the Tukituki and Waipawa rivers (Upper Tukituki catchment);

·      all other material.

The financial contribution is established in the Regional Resource Management Plan under Section 108 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

 

Resource consent charges for gravel extraction are due and payable monthly on the same day as extraction declarations.

4.    Charges for Gravel Extraction Land Use Consents

Charges for Non-notified Applications

A charge payable in advance for receiving, processing and deciding on non-notified land use consent applications to extract gravel:

·      0-50 cubic metres                     $20

·      50 cubic metres and over        $80

(For charges for notified gravel extraction land use consents, see Table 1 and associated text.)


Table 3: Gravel Extraction Charges based on $ per Cubic Metre Extracted per annum (Excluding GST)

 

State of Environment Monitoring Charge (S35 of RMA)

Compliance / Allocation Charge   (S36 of RMA)

Financial Contribution (S108 of RMA)

Total

Upper Tukituki catchment

No charge

$0.20

No charge

$0.20

Inferior grade

$0.12

No charge

$0.08

$0.20

All Other

$0.12

$0.60

$0.08

$0.80

 

 

 

5.    Charges for the Preparation of, or Change to the Regional Policy Statement or a Regional Plan

Applicants for the preparation of or change to the Regional Policy Statement or any regional plan will be subject to the following fixed charge payable in advance: $1000 (excl GST).

If the actual costs incurred by HBRC in preparing, varying or changing the Regional Policy Statement or any regional plan exceed the charge payable in advance, then these costs may be recovered by way of an additional charge. The additional charge shall be based on actual costs as calculated by multiplying the actual hours involved in preparing or changing the Regional Policy Statement or any regional plan by the hourly rates for staff involved (see Table 6), adding any actual disbursements (see Table 6) and subtracting the charge referred to above. The total calculated amount shall then, if necessary, be adjusted to reflect HBRC's actual and reasonable costs having regard to the factors referred to in section 36(4) of the Resource Management Act (RMA). An additional charge is levied under subsection 36(3) of the RMA and such charges are subject to objection and appeal under section 36(6) of the RMA.

 

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Building Act Charges

Introduction

The processing of building consents for dams and issuing of Project Information Memoranda (PIMs) for dams and administering dam safety regulations are new statutory functions for the HBRC under the Building Act (2004) and its amendments. Dam safety regulations become operative on 1 July 2010. Amounts stated for Building Act charges below are exclusive of GST.

PIM Costs

A fixed charge (deposit) is payable in advance, and an additional charge may be payable once the application has been decided. The fixed charge for this is listed in Table 4.

Building Consent Costs

This function has been transferred to Waikato Regional Council (WRC). The transfer agreement specifies that Building Consent costs will be recovered on an actual and reasonable basis, with hourly rates and fixed charges from WRC. These charges are set and recovered directly by WRC. Any HBRC processing costs will be as specified in Table 4 under Resource Management Charges.

Certificate of Acceptance Costs

This function is retained by HBRC, but WRC will provide technical advice into the process. A fixed charge (deposit) is payable in advance, and an additional charge may be payable once the application has been decided. The fixed charge for this is listed in Table 4.

Department of Building and Housing and Building Research Authority of New Zealand Levies

Department of Building and Housing (DBH) and Building Research Authority of New Zealand (BRANZ) levies were required by regulation on 1 March 2008. These levies may change in accordance with amendments made to regulations. The Hawke’s Bay Regional Council (HBRC) is required to collect and pay DBH and BRANZ levies as regulated for all Building Consent Applications and Certificate of Acceptance Applications.

The following fees apply to all building work with an estimated value greater than $20,000 - DBH levy – $2.01 for every $1000 (or part of $1000) of the estimated value of the building work. BRANZ levy – $1 for every $1000 (or part of $1000) of the estimated value of the building work.

Table 4: Fixed Charges (Deposit) for Building Act Applications (Excluding GST)

Item

PIM

Certificate of Acceptance

Amendment to Compliance Schedule

Large Dam

(above $100,000 value)

$1000

$4000

$1000

Medium Dam

($20,000 to <$100,000 value)

$750

$2000

$1000

Small Dam

($0 to <$20,000 value)

$500

$500

$1000

Additional Building Act Charges

Where an additional charge is to be made, the charge will be recovered on an actual and reasonable basis. This shall be calculated by multiplying the actual hours involved in undertaking monitoring of the application by the hourly rate for the staff involved and adding any actual disbursements (as in Table 4).

An additional charge will apply to:

·       all PIMs, Certificate of Acceptance Applications, and Amendment to a Compliance Schedule applications when the fixed charge does not cover the costs of processing.

·       all other unspecified Building Act duties that deal with its application, processing or compliance, and are attributable directly to a dam. These charges are payable by the owner of a dam.


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Standard Charges under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 - Marine Tier 1 Oil Transfer Sites

Maritime Rule Part 130B requires that the operator of an oil transfer site obtain the approval for a site marine oil spill contingency plan from the Director of Maritime New Zealand. The power to approve these plans has been delegated by the Director to the Chief Executive (sub-delegated to HBRC Regional On Scene Commanders) of HBRC in an Instrument of Delegation pursuant to Section 444(2) of the Maritime Transport Act 1994. Section 444(12) of the Maritime Transport Act 1994 allows HBRC to charge a person a reasonable fee for:

·      Approving Tier 1 site marine oil spill contingency plans and any subsequent amendments

Table 5:  Navigation and Safety Charges

Licence Type

Vessels not Under Safe Ship Management

Annual Charge Payable in Advance (Excluding GST)

Passenger Vessel Licence

– Passenger Vessel Owner’s Licence

– Passenger Vessel Licence (per vessel)

 

$100

$40

Hireboat Licence

– Hireboat Owner’s licence

 

$100

 

Pilot-exemption Recommendations/Revalidation

 

$300

Applications for Suspension or Exemptions under Bylaw 5.1

­ Public Notification

 

 

Actual Advertising Costs

·      Inspecting Tier 1 sites and any subsequent action taken thereafter in respect of preparation of inspection reports or reporting on non-conformance issues.

Tier 1 Site operators shall be charged a basic charge of $312 per Tier 1 Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plan approval. Where the cost incurred by HBRC when approving a contingency plan is greater than $350, the Tier 1 Site operator will be charged the actual and reasonable cost.

Inspecting Tier 1 sites, auditing response exercises and subsequent follow up reports and corrective actions shall be charged the actual and reasonable cost of the required work.

Actual and reasonable charges shall be calculated using the hourly rates listed in the Charge Rates section, Table 6.


Navigation and Safety By-laws Charges

The Local Government Act enables HBRC to charge for various functions it undertakes in accordance with the Navigation and Safety By-laws.

A fixed charge of $183 will be charged to all vessels requiring a permit to be issued outside the hours of 8am – 4pm on a normal working day.

Internal and external costs incurred responding to breaches of Navigation and Safety By-laws, securing of vessels, responding to unseaworthy or sinking vessels, and other tasks required to be undertaken to ensure safe navigation can be maintained, shall be charged actual and reasonable costs (Table 5) to the master, owner or person who caused the cost to be incurred.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

Charges Relating to Contaminated Site Management

These charges are set in accordance with section 150 of the Local Government Act 2002.

Table 3a: Charges relating to contaminated sites

Where a party requests information about the ‘contaminated site’ status of a property

A charge of $200

An additional charge based on actual and reasonable costs may apply if a site inspection is required

Where a party requests HBRC review and comment on contaminated site investigation and remediation reports

Actual and reasonable charges will apply

Where a party requests more extensive involvement of HBRC staff

A charge based on the actual and reasonable costs of staff time incurred

 

Charges for the Provision of Information

The Regional Council (HBRC) shall charge for the provision of any information including the Regional Policy Statement, regional plans and resource consents as follows.

·      The first hour of time spent actioning a request for information on each or any occasion relating to the same general matter shall be provided free of charge.

·      HBRC reserves its rights under section 13 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA) to charge for the provision of information above one hour. HBRC delegates the decision for treating requests made by the same person and in quick succession as one request, to the Chief Executive.

·      Staff time spent actioning any request over and above the time provided free of charge shall be charged at the rates set out in Table 6. HBRC may also choose to require payment in advance.

·      The first 20 pages of black and white photocopying on standard A4 or A3 paper shall be provided free of charge.

·      Where the total number of pages of photocopying is in excess of 20 then the rates set out in Table 6 will apply.

·      In alignment with the LGOIMA, HBRC does not consider requests for explanations in its definition of information requests.

Table 6: Charge rates (excl GST) for the purpose of calculating actual costs per hour

Item

Per Hour

Executive

$125

Asset Management

$98

Environmental Science

$95

Strategic Direction

$99

Environmental Regulation

­ Resource consent processing

­ Resource consent administration

­ Management input into resource consent processing including attendance at hearings and during deliberations

­ Compliance/impact monitoring of consents and Approving, monitoring & auditing of Tier 1 Marine Oil Spill Contingency Plans, and monitoring of Resource Management Act regulations

­ All other tasks, consent processing

­ All other tasks, compliance monitoring

 

$123

$82

$126

 

$107

 

 

 

$82

$85

Environmental Information

$75

Land Management

$85

Disbursement costs shall be charged at the rates of:

­ Accommodation

­ Public notification

­ Photocopying

 

 

 

­ External laboratory testing

­ Consultant fees

 

$150 a night per person

Actual advertising costs

20c per A4 page B&W;  40c per A4 page colour; 30c per A3 page B&W; 70c per A2 page B&W

actual cost

actual cost

 


For Information Only

Charges by the Crown

HBRC is responsible for collecting the following Crown fees, rents and royalties in addition to its charges:

In the Coastal Marine Area:

·       Extraction of sand and gravel - $1.51 excluding GST per cubic metre royalty;

·       Rent for the occupation of land from the Crown;

·       Geothermal royalties.


Due Dates for Payment

·      Charges payable in advance for consent applications are due on the filing of an application.

·      Charges payable for photocopying of less than $20 are due on collection of the copies.

·      All other charges will be due and payable on the 20th of the month following date of the invoice.

Cost of Debt Recovery

All debt collection costs incurred by HBRC in relation to the activities covered in this part shall be borne as a debt by the party whose actions caused the initial charge.

 


HBRC 2014-15 Annual Plan - Part 3 Financial Information

Attachment 4

 

The list below provides definitions of terms and acronyms frequently used within this Annual Plan.

 


ACC                                       Accident Compensation Corporation

AEP                                       Annual Exceedance Probability, the chance of a flood of a given size occurring in any one year

AHB                                       Animal Health Board

AO                                         Audit Office, which checks council plans and financial statements for compliance with legislation and standards of practice

AQMS                                  Air Quality Monitoring Strategy

Airshed                                A defined geographic area where air pollution is monitored.  This area is legally gazetted by the government.

BASS                                     Better Administrative Support Systems

BOI                                        Board of Inquiry

CAPEX                                  Capital Expenditure (budget to purchase assets)

CCTOs                                  Council Controlled Trading Organisations

CDEM                                   Civil Defence Emergency Management

CE                                          Chief Executive

CHBDC                                 Central Hawke’s Bay District Council

Class Vie or Class VIIe    A measure of the gradient of the land, with Class VIIe being the steepest land with a high risk of eroding

Clean Heat                         Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s insulation and clean heating funding assistance programme for homeowners

CMA                                     Coastal Marine Area

CPI                                         Consumer Price Index

CRI                                         Crown Research Institute

DHB                                       District Health Board

DOC                                      Department of Conservation

ECAN                                    Environment Canterbury Regional Council

EECA                                     Energy Efficiency & Conservation Authority

EMO                                     Emergency Management Officer

EOC                                       Emergency Operations Centre (for CDEM)

EPA                                       Environmental Protection Authority

ERMA                                   Environmental Risk Management Authority

ETS                                        Emissions Trading Scheme

EW                                         Environment Waikato (Waikato Regional Council)

Flood event                       (or rainfall event) a period in which flood or rain is monitored for hazard warning

GDP                                      Gross Domestic Product

GE                                          Genetic Engineering

GIS                                        Geographic Information System

GMO                                    Genetically Modified Organism

Hapu                                     Maori sub-tribe

HASNO                                Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act

HBCDEM                             Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management

HBRC                                    Hawke’s Bay Regional Council

HBRIC Ltd                            Hawke’s Bay Regional Investment Company

HDC                                       Hastings District Council

Horizons                              Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council

HPFCS                                  Heretaunga Plains Flood Control Scheme

HPUDS                                 Heretaunga Plains Urban Development Strategy

IRR                                         Internal Rate of Return

ISO                                        International Organisation for Standardisation

Iwi                                         Maori tribe

Kaitiaki                                 Maori term for guardianship

KPI                                         Key Performance Indicator

Kyoto Protocol                 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

LAPP                                     Local Authority Protection Programme

LGA                                       Local Government Act

LGNZ                                    Local Government New Zealand

LGOIMA                              Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987

LOS                                        Level of Service

LTCCP                                   Long Term Council Community Plan – former name for Ten Year Plan or Long Term Plan

LTP                                        Long Term Plan, a 10 year plan required to be produced every 3 years by all councils in New Zealand

McLean Scale                    A method for measuring populations of rabbits on land

MPI                                       Ministry for Primary Industries - previously called Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF)

MTA                                      Maritime Transport Act 1994

MTI                                       Maungaharuru-Tangitu Iwi Incorporated, the mandated body for several hapu in the Tangoio, Tutira, and Maungaharuru areas

MoU                                     Memorandum of Understanding

NCC                                       Napier City Council

NES                                       National Environmental Standard

NGO                                     Non Government Organisation

NKII                                       Ngati Kahungunu Iwi Incorporated

NPS                                       National Policy Statement

NZ GAAP                             New Zealand Generally Accepted Accounting Practice

NZTA                                    New Zealand Transport Agency

NZCPS                                  New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement

PCA                                       Pest Control Area

PIF                                         Performance Improvement Framework

PM 10                                    Particulate matter of 10 microns in size -This is very fine material (in dust , smoke or sea spray) which can get into people’s lungs and cause respiratory illness; Air quality monitoring measures the amount of PM10 in the air

PONL                                    Port of Napier Limited trading as Napier Port

RCEP                                     Regional Coastal Environment Plan

Rates                                    Please refer to Targeted Rates, UAGC and UAC

RID                                        Rating Information Database

RLS                                        Regional Landcare Scheme

RLTS                                      Regional Land Transport Strategy

RMA                                     Resource Management Act

RPMS                                   Regional Pest Management Strategy

RPS                                        Regional Policy Statement

RRMP                                   Regional Resource Management Plan

RSAP                                     Regional Safety Action Plan

SOE                                       State of the Environment

SOI                                        Statement of Intent

TAG                                       Technical Advisory Group

Targeted Rates                 Rates set against particular properties, to fund activities specific to that area

Tb or TB                               [Bovine] Tuberculosis, an infectious disease of cattle

Telemetry                          Device that can automatically transmit and record various monitoring information, such as water use and soil moisture levels

TLA                                        Territorial local authority – a legal term for a city or district council

TOR                                       Terms of Reference

Total Control                     Management level for plant or animal pests

TTOH                                    Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga

TTOT                                     Te Taiwhenua o o Tamatea

UAC                                      Uniform Annual Charge, a targeted rating method where a fixed amount is charged on each property within a specific area

UAGC                                   Uniform Annual General Charge, a fixed amount charged on each property

Vector control                  Pest control to prevent the spread of disease by ‘vectors’ or carriers (i.e. TB Vector control )

VTR                                       Voluntary Targeted Rate

WCO                                     Water Conservation Order

WDC                                     Wairoa District Council

  



[1] PM10 monitoring is measurement of the mass concentration of particulate material smaller than 10 µm, expressed as a 24-hour average value.