HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
HB
Civil Defence Emergency Management Group
Tuesday 20 September 2011
SUBJECT: Hawke's Bay Joint Hazard Strategy for
Local Authority Land-Use Planning
REASON FOR REPORT
1. On 16 August 2011, the Coordinating
Executive Group endorsed in principle the newly developed Hawke’s Bay Joint
Hazard Strategy for Local Authority Land Use Planning.
2. The Hawke’s Bay Regional Policy
Statement (RPS) as it currently stands does not provide strong guidance on best
practice or a strong driver for hazard risk avoidance as opposed to mitigation
of risk. The Joint Hazard Strategy states the RPS could be improved in this
regard, and in-turn, so too could district plans and other land use
decision-making.
3. The Joint Committee is asked to endorse
the newly developed Hawke’s Bay Joint Hazard Strategy for Local Authority Land
Use Planning.
BACKGROUND
4. Following a workshop in 2010 with
Hawke’s Bay Planners and CDEM staff it was decided to develop a Joint Hazard
Strategy with Hawke’s Bay local authorities that set out a framework to achieve
better integration and a commonality in the treatment of hazard risks in the
land use planning environment. Brendan Morris Consulting Ltd was commissioned
to develop a strategy.
5. In early 2011, the CEG raised questions,
such as “how and where do hazards identified in the CDEM Group Plan fit with
Regional Policy Statements, regional plans and district plans?” The Hawke's Bay
Council Planners Forum[1] was
satisfied that the Joint Hazard Strategy provided a framework which will enable
clearer connectivity of CDEM hazard planning, district plans, regional plans
and the Regional Policy Statement.
COMMENT
6. The Joint Strategy was endorsed
in-principle by the Coordinating Executive Group at its meeting in August 2011.
Attached (as Appendix 1), is the summarised version of the Joint Strategy.
Local authority staff involved in the development of the Strategy hold complete
final versions of the strategy document.
7. The Strategy will sit outside statutory
plans and decision-making but will nevertheless provide guidance to them,
seeking to achieve community risk reduction. The Strategy has been developed
recognising appropriate levels of statutory planning are necessary for
avoidance and mitigation of hazard risks in the region. The Joint Strategy can
also assist non-statutory planning strategies for the mitigation of hazard
risks, such as research and information, urban design and construction, early
warning systems, education and participation and communication and
consultation.
8. At a workshop in March 2011, council
planning representatives agreed the development of agreed overarching regional
principles would be beneficial, where those principles are in turn implemented
by territorial authorities’ actions (for example, including provisions in
district plans).
9. The overarching principles should be
incorporated into the Regional Policy Statement (RPS). The Joint Hazard
Strategy recommends that both the RPS and district plans incorporate best
practice concepts for land-use planning as a part of their respective plan
review processes. Best practices include, amongst other things, clarity of
intention and preference for natural hazard avoidance in first instance, then
appropriate standards for mitigation where avoidance is not practicable.
10. The RPS as it currently stands does not
provide strong guidance on best practice or a strong driver for hazard risk
avoidance relative to appropriateness of hazard mitigation.
11. The Joint Hazard Strategy makes numerous
conclusions, including:
11.1. that the RPS could be improved to:
11.1.1. place more emphasis on avoidance in
preference to mitigation for certain types of hazards;
11.1.2. provide guidance for ‘significant’
hazards; and
11.1.3. focus on policy implementation as
well as information provision.
11.2. that district plans could benefit
from a consistent regional approach that picks up on best practice guidance;
and
11.3. that there are opportunities to
improve district plans as part of their ongoing review processes.
OPTIONS:
12. The Joint Strategy recommends the RPS
delivers stronger direction and guidance than it currently does for management
of natural hazards and land use development. The CEG considered several
options about how that could be achieved given the Regional Council’s current
committed programme of plan reviews and plan changes. Options considered by
the CEG were as follows:
12.1. Retain the RPS as is, and
rely on closer working council relationships plus ‘faith’ in respective
councils each willingly adopting best practice approaches for land use and
natural hazard planning;
12.2. Incorporate ‘incidental’
amendments into the growth management and infrastructure related RPS plan
change[2]
currently being drafted and aiming for public notification in October 2011;
12.3. Preparing and notifying a more
considered and comprehensive RPS plan change separate from the growth
and infrastructure change. Real benefit of any such change would be realised
if this change was in place ahead of second generation district planning review
processes (eg: HDC’s plan review has commenced. Draft plan expected late 2012
and proposed plan end of 2013). HDC and NCC planning staff are already
discussing opportunities to harmonise content of their district plans as part
of the plan review processes.
13. If the Joint Committee want to see
genuine improvements in natural hazard management and land use planning, then
it is recommended that Option (12.3) be pursued. This will require subsequent
decisions to provide the necessary resourcing to get the job done as that work
would be beyond the Regional Council planning team’s current capacity.
CEG RESOLUTIONS
14. At its meeting on 16 August, the CEG
resolved to support in-principle development of joint statutory policy for
natural hazard management as recommended in the Strategy. The CEG also
resolved that local authorities consider the implications of statutory policy
development for natural hazard management through development of Long Term
Plans (2012-2022).
15. Arising from the CEG’s discussion was an
action for the Hawke's Bay Council Planners’ Forum to progress the strategy
development and confirm an implementation process to ensure practicality and
alignment with risk avoidance. The Forum’s work is intended to inform
development of 2012-2022 Long Term Plans.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Joint
Committee resolve:
1. To endorse, in principle, the ‘Hawke’s Bay Joint Hazard Strategy for Local Authority
Land Use Planning.
2. To support, in principle, the development
of joint statutory policy for natural hazard management as recommended in the
Strategy, subject to an agreed process.
|
|
Gavin Ide
Team
Leader Policy
|
Lisa Pearse
Emergency
Management Coordinator
|
Attachment/s
|
1View
|
Hawke's Bay
joint hazard strategy for local authority land-use planning
|
|
|
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
HB
Civil Defence Emergency Management Group
Tuesday 20 September 2011
SUBJECT: Tsunami Inundation Mapping
REASON FOR REPORT
1. On 16 August 2011 CEG
were informed on tsunami inundation hazard map production,
2. The HBRC’s 10 Year
Hazards Research Plan contributes to our understanding of significant hazards
and the Council has been developing tsunami inundation hazards maps (Level 3)
based on dynamic wave-propagation models for Hawke’s Bay.
3. This report is to
inform the Joint Committee that while mapping all of Hawke’s Bay will take
another year to complete, one of the significant areas of mapping, namely the
Hawke’s Bay Coast between Clive and Bay View, was publicly released in August
2011.
BACKGROUND
4. HBRC has committed to a
long term programme of research to improve the understanding of natural hazards
with the potential to adversely impact on the region. HBRC has worked closely
with GNS Science and NIWA over the past 20 years on this programme and as a
result is recognised nationally for being proactive in this area.
5. While our detailed
understanding of natural hazards will continue to improve, we believe that it
is appropriate that the current knowledge is utilised to:
5.1. Enable communities to understand the
natural hazard risks to which they are exposed.
5.2. Mitigate that risk through public
education and response planning, in the short term; and appropriate strategies,
e.g. land use planning for new developments in the longer term.
6. This briefing paper
aims to deal with public education and response planning. A strategy for
dealing with longer term mitigation approaches is planned for development in
the 2011/12 financial year.
COMMENT
7. After tsunami events in
Chile, Tonga, Bali, Samoa and most recently Japan, there is a reasonable
awareness of what tsunami can do on land. What has not been clearly understood
is to what extent sea-water is likely to travel inland in the Bay. The
inundation maps being developed are a way to inform the public on what could be
expected from a near-source or distant-source tsunami.
8. As reported to the CEG
in March 2011 Hastings District Council have been working on a community
response planning pilot (as per the HB CDEM Group work programme) and as a
result Clifton, Haumoana and Te Awanga were the first communities to obtain
tsunami inundation hazards maps in 2010 (Fig 1).
Figure 1: Tsunami inundation maps were provided to Clifton, Haumoana
& Te Awanga in 2010
9. Working with GNS and
the Regional Council on this detailed hazard information Hastings District
Council staff have conducted public meetings, formed a community committee and
developed unique community response plans including evacuation routes for these
areas.
10. Since these communities
obtained their tsunami inundation hazards maps, the Regional Council has had
repeated requests from the public and media for mapping for other coastal
communities who want to understand their risks and are keen for evacuation
routes to be established and signage be installed.
11. The Regional Council has
agreed with CDEM staff in the region a priority list for the modelling which is
shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2: Tsunami inundation modelling schedule
12. Wairoa District Council
asked for a preliminary map in March 2011 to allay community concerns there
following the Japan tsunami, and the map in Figure 3 was provided only as a
preliminary model as the inundation areas may change as work continues.
13. In May 2011 Regional
Council presented initial results on the tsunami mapping from Clive to Tangoio
to Napier City Council and Hastings District Council staff to discuss
requirements for final content of the related technical report.
RELEASE OF INFORMATION
14. The next area of mapping
released covered a much broader area which included several communities from
Clive to Bay View. A carefully considered programme of activities was undertaken
to ensure that Council’s and their communities were properly informed and
minimal alarm was caused. Note: the Clive Community held a public meeting to
start work on their Community Response Plan on 16 August 2011 Hawke’s Bay
Regional Council staff give a presentation on Clive’s tsunami risk, along with
the other top 10 hazard risks for this area.
15. Modelling results have
been supplied to local councils so the information can then be used by Council
staff to work with local people to prepare community response plans and related
tsunami evacuation maps. But it will likely take some time to develop
community response planning for many of these communities, particularly given
the population numbers involved and that the area straddles two territorial
boundaries.
16. Tsunami inundation
mapping results have now been published in local newspapers with clear
explanations of the uncertainties, the key message being the need to
understand natural warning signals for a locally generated event such as a very
strong felt earthquake or slow earthquake (one that goes for over one minute)
where self evacuation is the only option. Annex A sets out the approach that
was used for the release of this mapping information.
Figure 3: Preliminary model of Wairoa tsunami inundation areas provided
in March 2011
17. This mapping will also
have implications for land use planning. Adherence to recent tsunami and land
use planning guidelines (New Zealand’s Next Top Model – Integrating tsunami
modelling into land use planning GNS Science Series 34, April 2011) is
recommended. This contains recommendations for hazard registers and that Level
3 modelling is noted in LIMs. These matters will be considered at the next
meeting of the HB Planners Forum along with those already agreed in the HB Joint
Hazard Strategy for Local Authority Land Use Planning.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Joint Committee resolve:
1. To receive the HBRC Report “Hawke’s
Bay Tsunami Inundation Model Preliminary Results Tangoio to Cape Kidnappers”
2. Note that HBRC has released the
model results between Clive and Bay View as outlined to CEG, including
holding a joint press conference with Napier and Hastings Councils and by
publishing in local papers along with key messages.
|
|
Mike Adye
Group
Manager Asset Management
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no
attachments for this report.
HAWKE’S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL
HB
Civil Defence Emergency Management Group
Tuesday 20 September 2011
SUBJECT: HB CDEM Group Appointments - Group
and Local Controller
REASON FOR REPORT
1. Under the Civil Defence
Emergency Management Act 2002 (CDEM Act) and within the Hawke’s Bay Civil
Defence Emergency Management Group Plan the Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (CDEMG) Joint Committee:
1.1. Makes appointments to
the positions of Group Controller and Group Recovery Manager and Local
Controllers.
1.2. Establishes a
Co-ordinating Executive Group (CEG)
1.3. Carries out functions
and duties conferred on the CDEM Group
2. This paper:
2.1. Advises the appointment
of a new Group Manager HB CDEM
2.2. Seeks the appointment
of a new Group Controller
2.3. Seeks revision of the
hierarchy of Group Controller and Alternate Group Controller appointments.
2.4. Seeks confirmation of
the appointments of Local and Alternate Local Controllers
2.5. Proposes changes to the
HB CDEM Group Plan.
COMMENT
3. At its meeting on 28
March 2011, the Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (CDEM) Joint Committee
resolved to:
3.1. Agree
to the changes to the Group Emergency Management Office structure and resourcing
proposed by the Chief Executives of the local authorities.
3.2. Formally
support the proposal for additional resources in the Group Emergency Management
Office as provided for in the Administrating Authorities (HBRC) 2011/2012 Draft
Annual Plan.
3.3. Agreed
that the employment process and decision making for the Manager Emergency
Management Office/Group Controller position be delegated to the current Group
Controller, Chairman of the CEG and Director of the Ministry of Civil Defence
and Emergency Management, with the process to identify a suitable person for
the position commencing as soon as approval is obtained from the Administrating
Authority with regard to assurances around the provision of resourcing in the
HBRC 2011/2012 Draft Annual Plan.
4. On 16 March 2011
financial estimates to provide new (increased) services for the HB CDEM Group
budget were included in the Administrating Authority (Hawke’s Bay Regional Council’s) Draft 2011/12 Annual Plan which was
put out for public consultation.
5. In April 2011 the Administrating Authority (HBRC) contracted BDO Hawkes Bay Ltd to review the proposed Group staffing structure
and develop a role description for the Group Manager HB CDEM.
6. On 29 June 2011 Hawke’s
Bay Regional Council approved their 2011/12 Annual Plan making available an
increase to the budget of the HB CDEM Group.
Appointment of a Group Manager HB CDEM
7. The Group Manager HB CDEM position was
advertised in June 2011. Twenty nine applications were received. The
applications were refined to a short list of five. The interview panel;
Chairman of CEG, Group Controller and Director MCDEM undertook interviews on 7
July 2011. Ian Macdonald was appointed and will commence the role on 5
September 2011.
8. Ian has completed an honours degree in environmental planning at Massey
University. He has 14 years experience in local government working in
development control and policy development at Ruapehu and Hastings District
Councils. He was the Planning Manager at Hastings District Council before
moving into strategic planning and projects. He is currently the Strategic
Projects Manager at Hastings District Council.
9. During his time with
Hastings District Council he has been involved in the management of a number of
emergencies and most recently spent two weeks as the planning and operations
manager as part of the response and recovery operations related to the heavy
rain event that impacted on the coast of the region after Easter this year.
10. Ian is also a member of
the NZ Army Reserve (Territorial Force). He was commissioned as an infantry
officer in 1986. In the mid 1990s he spent two years on full time duties which
included one year deployed on operations in the Middle East. He has held a
number of command appointments including command of the local 7 Wellington
Hawke’s Bay Battalion.
11. He has attended and
instructed at military staff colleges in New Zealand and Canada and has
experience in training and exercise development. Ian currently holds the rank
of Lieutenant Colonel and is posted to Army General Staff, Wellington and is
responsible for the selection and career management of Army Reserve officers.
Appointment of a new Group Controller
12. Under section 26 of the
Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 only the HB CDEM Group Joint
Committee can make appointments to the role of Group Controller and Alternate
Group Controller.
13. As a part of the duties
of the Group Manager
HB CDEM the position has the additional
responsibilities of Group Controller during any declared emergency. At their meeting
on 16 August CEG resolved to recommend to the Joint Committee the appointment
of Ian Macdonald to the role of Group Controller.
14. If the Joint Committee
agree to the appointment of Ian Macdonald as the Group Controller an amendment to the
Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence Emergency Management Group Plan to that effect is
required.
15. Previously at its meeting
on 3 May 2010, the Civil Defence Emergency Management Group (CDEM) Joint
Committee appointed Ross McLeod the Chief Executive of Hastings District
Council as Group Controller and Andrew Newman, Chief Executive Officer, Hawke’s
Bay Regional Council and Ken Foote, Director Support
Services, Hawke’s Bay District Health Board as Alternate Group Controllers.
16. It is proposed that the
CEG recommend to the Joint Committee an alteration to the appointments of Group
Controller and Alternate Group Controllers and that the Joint
Committee amend the HB
CDEM Group Plan to state:
10.6.1 Group Controller
Under section 26 of the Act, the CDEM Group is required to appoint a
Group Controller.
Ian Macdonald, Group Manager HB CDEM is appointed to
be the Group Controller.
Under section 26 of the Act, the CDEM Group may appoint alternate Group
Controllers. The following people are appointed alternate Group Controllers,
who will perform the functions and duties and exercise the powers of the Group
Controller in the absence of the Group Controller:
· Andrew Newman, Chief Executive Officer,
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
· Ross McLeod, Chief Executive Officer,
Hastings District Council
· Ken Foote, Secretary, Hawke’s Bay District
Health Board
As required by the Act, the CDEM Group retains the right to remove or
replace the Group Controller or any person appointed as alternate Group
Controller.
17. The Joint Committee will
need to consider consequences of this proposal when agreeing these
appointments.
18. To formally complete this
process the Joint Committee must agree to an amendment to the Hawke’s Bay Civil
Defence Emergency Management Group Plan as proposed above.
Confirmation of the appointments of Local and Alternate Local
Controllers
19. Under section 27 of the
Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 only the HB CDEM Group Joint
Committee can make appointments to the role of Local Controller and Alternate
Local Controller.
20. Each of the Territorial
Local Authorities currently identifies Local Controllers and Alternate Local
Controllers by employment position title from within their organisation
structure.
21. Each Territorial Local
Authority was asked to confirm current titles and the names of the appointees
so that the CEG and Joint Committee can be informed and if necessary any
amendments can be proposed for the HB CDEM Group Plan.
22. The last amendment to the
appointments of Local Controller and Alternate Local Controller was made in May
2010.
23. Correspondence from the
Territorial Local Authorities confirm that:
· There
are no changes in title or role holder amongst Local Controller appointees.
· An
Alternate Local Controller role holder change is forecast by Napier City
Council
· An
Alternate Local Controller role holder title change is advised by Wairoa
District Council
24. Current appointments of
Local Controller and Alternate Local Controller by name and employment title
are:
Central
Hawke’s Bay District Council:,
Local Controller TeArohanui Cook - Regulatory Services Manager
Alternate Local Controllers; Steve Thrush - Technical Services Manager,
Shawn
McKinley - Roading Manager
Bruce Kitto
- Emergency Management Officer
John Freeman
- Chief Executive
Hastings District Council:
Local Controller Mike Maguire - Group Manager: Corporate & Customer
Services
Alternate Local Controllers; David Fraser - Group Manager: Asset
Management
Dennis Morgan - Group Manager: Strategy & Development
Donald Scott - Manager Emergency Management
Napier City Council:
Local Controller Alastair Thompson - Planning Manager
Alternate Local Controllers; Warren Burch - Corporate Services Manager
Antoinette Campbell - Community Development Manager
Angela Reade - Civil Defence Manager
Neil Taylor - Chief Executive
Bill McWatt - Works Asset Manager
It is understood that in September 2011 a change of incumbent is
scheduled for the Corporate Services Manager. Fiona Green is identified as the planned successor to
Warren Burch.
Wairoa District Council:
Local Controller Peter Freeman - Chief
Executive Officer
Alternate Local Controllers; Neil Cook -
Engineering Manager
Des Jane - Team Leader By-Laws
James Baty - Administration Manager
25. CEG recommend to the
Joint Committee an alteration to the appointments of Alternate Local
Controllers and that the HB CDEM Group Plan be amended to state:
10.6.2
Local Controllers
Under section 27 of the Act the CDEM Group may appoint local
controllers. The CDEM Group appoints local controllers for each of the
districts within the region.
Within their
respective districts, the local controllers shall carry out all the functions
and duties of, or delegated to, the Group Controller and shall have all the
powers set out in sections 86 to 94 of the Act and also the power to authorise
any suitably qualified and experienced person to exercise any one or more of
those powers or to fulfil any one or more of those functions or duties and each
may delegate the whole or any part of those functions powers or duties as he or
she considers necessary subject, always, to any directions given by the Group
Controller.
The people by name or the holders of the following positions are
appointed as Local Controllers and Alternate Local Controllers for their
districts in order as below:
· Central Hawke’s Bay District
Council:,
Regulatory Services Manager, Technical Services Manager, Roading
Manager, Emergency
Management Officer and Chief Executive
· Hastings District Council: Group Manager: Corporate & Customer
Services, Group Manager: Asset Management, Group Manager: Strategy &
Development and Team Leader Emergency Management.
· Napier City Council: Planning Manager, Corporate
Services Manager, Community Development Manager, Civil Defence Manager, Chief
Executive, and Works Asset Manager.
· Wairoa District Council: Chief Executive Officer,
Engineering Manager, Team
Leader By-Laws and Administration Manager.
26. The Joint Committee will
need to consider consequences of this proposal when agreeing these
appointments.
27. To formally complete this
process the Joint Committee must agree to an amendment to the Hawke’s Bay Civil
Defence Emergency Management Group Plan as proposed above.
DECISION-MAKING PROCESS:
The CDEM Group, as
a joint committee operating in accordance with Schedule 7 of the Local
Government Act 2002 (the Act) is required to make every decision in accordance
with the provisions of Part 6 subpart 1 of the Act. Staff have assessed the
requirements contained within these sections of the Act in relation to this
briefing paper and have concluded the following:
(i) Sections
97 and 88 of the Act do not apply.
(ii) Sections
83 and 84 covering the statutory requirement to undertake a special
consultative procedure do not apply.
(iii) The
CDEM Group has adopted the CDEM Group Plan after a process of consultation in
accordance with the CDEM Act 2002 and has a responsibility to ensure that it is
implemented. The decisions to be made on this agenda item are associated with
the implementation of the Group Plan.
(iv) The
decisions will have no adverse impact on any member of the public or public
interest group.
(v) The
proposed decisions are not inconsistent with any existing CDEM Group policy or
plan.
|
RECOMMENDATIONS
The CEG recommend that the Joint Committee:
1. Agree that the decisions to be made are not significant
under the criteria contained in the adopted policy on significance of any of
the individual Member organisations and that the CDEM Group has the delegated
authority under its Terms of Reference and can exercise its discretion under
Sections 79(1)(a) and 82(3) of the Local Government Act 2002 and make
decisions on this issue without conferring directly with their individual
Member organisations or the community and persons likely to be affected by or
to have an interest in the decision due to the nature and significance of the
issue to be considered and decided.
2. Note the appointment of Ian Macdonald as Group Manager HB CDEM.
3. Appoint Ian Macdonald, as Group Controller with effect 5
September 2011.
4. Appoint
Andrew Newman, Ross McLeod, and Ken Foote as Alternate Group Controllers.
5. Amend section 10.6.1 of the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence
Emergency Management Group Plan to read as follows:
10.6 Appointments
10.6.1
Group Controller
Under section 26 of the Act, the CDEM Group is required to appoint a
Group Controller.
Ian Macdonald, Group Manager HB CDEM is appointed
to be the Group Controller.
Under section 26 of the Act, the CDEM Group may appoint alternate
Group Controllers. The following people are appointed alternate Group
Controllers, who will perform the functions and duties and exercise the
powers of the Group Controller in the absence of the Group Controller:
· Andrew Newman, Chief Executive Officer,
Hawke’s Bay Regional Council
· Ross McLeod, Chief Executive Officer,
Hastings District Council
· Ken Foote, Secretary, Hawke’s Bay
District Health Board
As required by the Act, the CDEM Group retains the right to remove or
replace the Group Controller or any person appointed as alternate Group
Controller.
6. Agree
to appointment Local Controllers and Alternate Local Controllers as set out
in the report.
7. Amend section 10.6.2 of the Hawke’s Bay Civil Defence
Emergency Management Group Plan to read as follows:
10.6.2
Local Controllers
Under section 27 of the Act the CDEM Group may appoint local
controllers. The CDEM Group appoints local controllers for each of the
districts within the region.
Within their
respective districts, the local controllers shall carry out all the functions
and duties of, or delegated to, the Group Controller and shall have all the
powers set out in sections 86 to 94 of the Act and also the power to
authorise any suitably qualified and experienced person to exercise any one
or more of those powers or to fulfil any one or more of those functions or
duties and each may delegate the whole or any part of those functions powers
or duties as he or she considers necessary subject, always, to any directions
given by the Group Controller.
The people by name or the holders of the following positions are
appointed as Local Controllers and Alternate Local Controllers for their districts
in order as below:
· Central Hawke’s Bay District
Council:, Regulatory Services Manager, Technical Services
Manager, Roading Manager, Emergency Management Officer and Chief Executive
· Hastings District Council: Group Manager: Corporate & Customer
Services, Group Manager: Asset Management, Group Manager: Strategy &
Development and Team Leader Emergency Management.
· Napier City Council: Planning Manager, Corporate
Services Manager, Community Development Manager, Civil Defence Manager, Chief
Executive, and Works Asset Manager.
· Wairoa District Council: Chief Executive Officer,
Engineering Manager, Team
Leader By-Laws and Administration Manager.
|
|
Andrew Newman
chairman
of the coordinating executive group
on
behalf of the ceg
|
|
Attachment/s
There are no
attachments for this report.
